TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NewAeon Archive

View 5 posts and 120 comments by NewAeon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I only ever hear this on the internet where people are criticizing it.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:42 PM
2

She blocked his path, made it impossible to ignore. She committed a crime. If he did as you suggest, and didn't give a fuck, it would be a hit and run.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 09:30 PM
9

He still needed to physically get past her to his appointment.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:29 PM
5

No, he did well. She was in the wrong, he had a right to proceed. Unless you suggest he punch her. What do you think he needed to do differently?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:27 PM
2

Has that movie done well? I haven't followed it, but this post reminded me.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:37 AM
6

I don't support the red pill, but these guys could learn something from them.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:57 PM
-5

This is a scam artist who used feminism. Let's not get confused here.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:54 PM
1

What do I do if this inspires me? Do I point at my screen? Do I click a new tab? How can I express my support?!
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:54 PM
4

My heart goes out to anyone who endures this. It is especially shameful that the military doesn't look after its own.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:50 PM
3

Does the car thing work? I can only do it once, so I want to be pretty sure...
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:27 PM
1

You misunderstood that. Criminal mischief at night. The other items do not have that constraint. B could have covered this as well.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:43 AM
4

I lived in a country that talked about regulating sporting equipment and banning anything with an edge more than 3 inches (yes, that included for cooking). It is almost like the weapon doesn't commit the crime, and it is easier to pass laws just to feel good rather than getting to the root of violence.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:30 PM
4

Individuals don't file charges, that is for the district attorney to decide.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 02:23 AM
1

Do NOT delete your social media accounts, including facebook. Removing dissenting opinion from your world, and allowing other people to remove your opinion from theres does not help. Getting a minority opinion heard is most important in places where it is being pushed out.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:39 PM
1

Of course not. You DO understand that is correct for any criminal case, and were the outcome assured before the trial it would be a horrible miscarriage of justice? You read an article in the internet. Do you actually believe that should be enough to guarantee a conviction?!
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:32 PM
2

This woman may face jail. Don't care if she keeps a gun in her car, it is legal and irrelevant where I live. Blocking in his car and damaging it is criminal, and she did so in a reckless manner. Charges are being considered and she may face jail time. That is appropriate.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:58 PM
18

It literally says no one was wounded in the article. She didn't shoot a person and charges are being considered. Appropriate response, crappy title.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:02 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6PZ623K6-0
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:25 AM
1

Communication must work at both ends Correct, and exactly my point. Most people here understood it. As did I. First you actually use grammar as a standard for a sentence being correct, then you shift gears to the absurdly low standard of something being understood regardless of effort. You going to stick with this attempt, go back to your absurd grammar argument next or what? Or do you have character enough to admit your first point was ill made and your second is un-provable? If you want, I can…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:39 PM
1

Grammatic correctness is never the point. It did a piss poor job of communicating which is the only point when it comes to words. Did you forget that language defines the rules, not the other way around?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:47 PM
0

It was shit, whatever your opinion.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 05:04 AM
11

That headline made me think I was having a stroke. How does one cry anything other than tears? How does a gang rape pretend to be a rapist? How is a boy awarded as a prize? Shouldn't fantasy be plural if there are hundreds of them?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:14 PM
0

Fair points which, if true, would indicate plagiarism. I don't especially care, my soap box is more about these things generally than Amy Schumer specifically. So if she isn't a good example for my list, so be it.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:03 PM
10

I don't know if she is funny, not seen her stuff. My experience though says the following things are true: People are not willing to dislike a performer and move on. They instead find opportunities to preach about how bad that performer is and act shocked at the popularity. Ignoring the fact that different people have different tastes and there are clearly enough people who like the performer to support the career. Accuse comedians of stealing jokes. From point 1 above, is she just stealing the …
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:08 PM
-2

Weakness is our own fault where it exists. Let's not blame our failings on others.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:31 PM
-1

Ignore the Karma hit. Thank you for pointing it out.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 07:41 PM
-14

This isn't men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:57 PM
4

Why would he have to? He isn't Jewish.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:50 PM
1

Holy circle jerk batperson!
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:14 PM
-1

I am just talking about basic fucking respect. I go into a clothing store and I could interrupt someone who is literally in the middle of the thing they are paid to do to ask them out, and it would make me an ass. A little respect to let them finish the transaction with the other person or myself and then asking them out goes a long way and keeps the conversation private. I am talking about a little social awareness and courtesy.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:39 PM
4

Not scummy, but questionable. Patronizing for sure. She was trying to do her job and that undercut her. If he had asked her before or after the interview I'd say he was fine. Talking to her like that during is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:53 PM
4

Says the guy who posted a smart-ass condescending correction to someone else's grammar. If you don't want to be talked down to, stop lowering yourself. EDIT: Sorry, I that was rude.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:06 AM
2

All these people read it fine, except you. That should tell you something sparky. EDIT: My tone was uncalled for. I apologize.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:37 AM
2

That is awesome!
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:16 PM
44

Sorry to see you being downvoted. It is great that they accept both and provide assistance to men. Thank you for sharing that. Emphasizing things that go in the right direction is important. Having to put them in hotels isn't ideal at all, but it is so good to hear the effort is being made.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:03 PM
1

"Are you disagreeing that women would have less value than men if there was an overpopulation problem" If there is an over population problem I value men and women the same. "disagreeing that there is an overpopulation problem" Correct, I do not believe there is an overpopulation problem. "today overpopulation is more of a problem than underpopulation" Either is a big problem, but I don't believe either is an issue today for our species. If we start a discussion about resource distribution, most…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:36 PM
1

Agreed, we are not struggling as a species. I disagree about overpopulation though. So in my world view men and women have equal value.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:45 PM
2

One male can impregnate many females, a female can only be impregnated by one male at a time. Therefore propagation of your group and us as a species means female lives are less expendable than male, though both groups are ultimately indispensable. As of right now it is fine to let women serve, or even require they serve in combat. That could change should the population start to dwindle.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:55 PM
4

Fun fact, I actually do! But it was my memory which failed in this case, I thought he mentioned hope when he spoke of its lack. "We don’t imagine the future. Our bodies want sex more than we want to stay alive. Literally. Lonely boys tend to be suicidal when the odds of future female companionship are low." He is talking *about utter long term futility, no future, and that is important context. Edit: but to *about
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:20 AM
-1

Ctrl+F is your friend.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:23 AM
1

You ignored the important part of that. Read it again. Pay attention to the part about hope.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 02:38 AM
9

No. She is saying they hold the same title.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:33 AM
12

No joke, those ads literally convinced me to grow a beard.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:28 PM
1

Mutual high fives over that!
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:54 AM
0

Still isn't OK. Again, thank you for visiting, we need a variety of perspectives.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:50 AM
1

Thank you for visiting. I hope we can continue to seek common ground.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:47 AM
4

Yes! Gay, bi of both genders welcome! While you are here please please please be careful of those who don't know the difference between advocating for men and attacking women. We need to support equality, and every voice that aids in that is welcome :D
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:57 AM
3

She wants one gender to suffer so she can be fashionable?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:22 PM
3

Good, because that wasn't his point.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:03 AM
1

True, but it is a terrible way to pre-empt it. Outragers gonna outrage, and "I'm note <blank> but..." does frequently come right before someone proves they are <blank>.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:50 AM
1

Your point in general is OK, it doesn't apply here though. Except it is a poor way to preface something.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:49 AM
1

He always seemed nice to me. Oddly though, he does seem like the type who would be very aggressive as well. I guess I don't know anything, but if he did do it I am not totally shocked.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:47 AM
3

Imagine a woman flies to Somalia, strips naked in the street, lays down on her back with her legs spread, has a sigh with an arrow pointing to her vulva. Does she then have any responsibility for the result? Obviously a woman who dresses in a hot sexy way doesn't deserve to be assaulted, does not owe anyone sex and has every right to safely end any encounter at any point. But is it really victim blaming to admit that there are levels of safety and risk that come with every decision? If someone w…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:46 AM
2

I want to know what she had in the bag.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:22 AM
5

The officer was seizing the car, she had to leave it so that it could be towed. She was not free to leave because the officer was still investigating the events that led to the stop and detainment, and she was a witness. It is reasonable to detain a witness to an infraction for a brief time while they investigate. In principle though, I agree with you. If he hadn't given her so many opportunities to leave the car and wait patiently for a few min I'd have been pretty critical of him as well.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:16 AM
1

The world is more varied than you know. It is time to start believing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:10 AM
1

Carrot and stick. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrot_and_stick
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:07 AM
2

Good cop. Seriously, dude was pro.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:04 AM
1

My comments about MRA's needing to be voices of moderation and reason are getting downvoted by the same amount. That seems odd.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 08:56 PM
1

Karen Straughan I like her, so that just kind of pisses me off. wow.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:31 PM
3

I don't actually know anything about that, but it sounds like the kind of thing that concerns me about the movement. I don't want to see MRAs get subverted by radicals. We need to keep our tone moderate and reasoned.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:12 PM
-16

The point is good but the title of the video. "Mindless cunts"? Really? It makes the video nearly useless.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:36 PM
3

We just tell them why we disagree. Sometimes, and it is appreciated when you do.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 12:23 AM
2

I meant from us. I don't feel as if the movement is hitting the right notes. And thank you for discussing. I have been blasted a little over my position here.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:36 PM
2

Thank you. I edited my post to be more clear, copied below for your convenience so you can upvote or downvote accordingly as well. EDIT apparently my saying he is getting screwed over had a connotation that I did not intend, but I maintain that when I posted the tone was generally attacking her. Sounds to me like she may have deserved it. BUT I maintain that we need to offer her the same benefit of the doubt we would offer a man.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:27 PM
2

When I posted all the comments I saw were negative. The context for my comment may have changed as others have posted. But yea, the fact that I can express my opinion here is why I like MRA's. This one is toxic sometimes, but I wonder if that has to do with people who are trying to make it look bad. Probably not always, but sometimes I wonder about that.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:18 PM
1

I HOPE reasonable belief is required. Seems like there is some standard she failed to meet as she is still being charged.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:15 PM
2

And she is getting investigated and facing charges. That is a good thing isn't it?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:08 PM
1

I assume the strength of your argument and eloquence are linked to your IQ. So want to try again?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:07 PM
11

SHE is being investigated, not him. They are saying he is the victim.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 04:01 PM
-15

EDIT apparently my saying he is getting screwed over had a connotation that I did not intend, but I maintain that when I posted the tone was generally attacking her. Sounds to me like she may have deserved it. BUT I maintain that we need to offer her the same benefit of the doubt we would offer a man. If I understood the article, they say it was legal if she believed he was abusing the kids. She may have honestly believed that. The prosecutors say no sexual abuse has taken place. My conclusion? …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:03 PM
5

That is her legal stance. Read the article for her personal stance.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:18 PM
5

She is not. Real feminists used to be far more abundant.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:17 PM
3

A real feminist, the kind that got me into feminism to begin with.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:16 PM
1

... uhhh ... I can't tell if you have ever been in a productive and healthy relationship.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:08 AM
2

Bad math one man and one woman - The woman always needs the seat down. The man needs the seat down 1/3rd of the time. If the man uses the toilet there is a high probability the seat will need to be down for the next transaction. If the woman uses the toilet there is about a 50/50 (EDIT, not 50/50, more like 1 in 4) chance that the seat should be up for the next transaction. So by the numbers, men should always put it down and women should occasionally put it up. BUT, if the man will never object…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:07 AM
2

Why the reluctance to actually explain?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:17 PM
2

I have no idea what you are talking about. Sorry.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:31 PM
8

The ones that are respected tended to significantly outperform their male counterparts, for whatever my anecdotal comment is worth. Misogyny is as alive and well in many parts of the military as are the female marines who are only there because of lower standards for women. The problem genuinely exists at both ends.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:52 PM
19

No. That is now how it works. Basic training uses elements of toxic leadership, but it is carefully orchestrated to produce a specific result. The bullying is planned and controlled with a specific goal. Everything, especially the details of how the abuse is applied, exists to build to a specific result. You won't go too far astray if you look to how brainwashing and cult indoctrination are done. Except the marines are far more professional in how the go about it. You can't just imitate a DI and…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:48 PM
12

EDIT: I stand mostly by the below, but can't help but feel he should have just gotten the kids out of the house. Maybe he could have gone to a domestic violence shelter or something. Correct. But it isn't an 'or'. What he did is how you do it. Think it through. He touches her to pull her back and the cops show up what happens? I am not asking what should happen, I am asking what will happen when police show up and a man has grabbed, touched, pushed or restrained a woman? Then he is in court aski…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:37 AM
37

He didn't need to save them from just one night. He needed to save them from all future nights like this. Don't confuse being a man with being a shortsighted fool who cares more about 'being a man' than saving his kids permanently.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:49 AM
1

Your phrasing for question 1 contains a false premise. It is not my 'feeling'. So let me answer your question and expand. I do not feel like reality is like TV because it is not like TV. The reason it is not like TV, which is the question you should have asked if you were willing to learn, is that actors and directors are not experienced in what they depict, and not motivated to depict things realistically. They are experienced and motivated to depict things an a dramatically interesting way. Th…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:30 PM
1

Twice now you talk about random crap without making a point. Explain how jurisprudential literature contradicts my statements about how badly people misjudge reactions to trauma. Or continue to hope that people will mistake obfuscation for wit. I don't but you may fool others.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:28 AM
1

You are using techniques for gaining advantage in a discussion. Make your points directly instead. If they have merit, let them speak for themselves. What points do Debord and Baudrillard make that you would apply here? Why? People come to the wrong conclusions about reactions to trauma. If you wish to make a point about trauma experts, make it, don't ask me to do your work.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:34 AM
1

Looking at the next best thing is fine. The utter failure caused by abject incompetence in interpreting those reactions is the problem. Real life isn't like TV.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:25 PM
5

As much as I like to see an innocent man exhonorated, I hate how people judge reactions. "Kenniff — who said his client fooled around with the model but did not have sex with her — said she appeared completely calm in the elevator ride down and in the lobby after making the allegation. “The surveillance footage showed her sipping from a water bottle in the lobby without a care in the world while waiting for the police to arrive,” Kenniff charged." When my father died we cried, but we also joked …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:39 PM
3

Thank you for promoting men's rights, instead of talking about issues with women or feminism. You have my support for this.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:17 AM
-3

Let's switch the focus back to men's rights, and away from 'women are mean'.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:08 PM
43

If a woman wants to hide it, how is lying better than not talking about it at all? EDIT: Article says someone walked in and saw them, so this was her explanation.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:43 PM
24

We don't need this here. Men's Rights isn't about women. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:41 PM
8

Breast cancer can affect men, it is not just a woman's disease. Just as legit as heart disease.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:57 PM
5

This looks legit to me. It helps women and doesn't hurt men. I support this.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:53 PM
1

Someone is covered in mud. You want things to be clean. Don't wrestle with the person covered in mud.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:03 PM
-2

Yes, all three of us have clear strong opinions on immigration and immigration laws, and to bring it up here is a distraction. We are here to talk about men's rights and not border control. My apologies for contributing to the derailment.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:23 PM
7

If you prefer the term criminal to illegal, that is your right. Illegal is a little more efficient because it also identifies the crime. If they don't want to be illegals, they can follow the law. One is illegal by being in a country illegally, we are not talking about accused illegals. One may be accused (wrongfully way too often) of that crime. Just as one may be accused of being a rapist without being a rapist. His point was that an accused criminal is treated worse than an actual criminal. H…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:22 PM
3

To be fair, learning from a situation is never actually the wrong choice.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:11 AM
3

So sorry that happened to you. There needs to be some way of identifying these character assassins.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:09 AM
2

As the OP, I'll give you an upvote. I think those other responses are unfair to your point. I support the equal rights old school feminism, and true egalitarianism, but refuse to use the feminist label any more. The ideology of feminism as currently practiced has no interest in addressing social injustice towards men. More extreme members of the group would see what happened to me as a very, very small form of justice against men. I will not be associated with the others who currently use that l…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:07 AM
1

Well... if I don't make an effort, people tend(ed) to be quite intimidated by me. People who could have easily handled me (physically, socially) didn't even try because of whatever aura of intimidation radiated. A few people can see right through that, and they were the ones who didn't join the crowd, or the one woman who called BS. Your point is well made though. One person calling this out would have given me a chance. I could have made that easier though if I had put any effort into building …
/r/MensRights09/08/14 09:59 AM
3

You are right, that would be the way to go; although it is difficult sometimes. I had not socially engaged with others in the class. I just wanted to show up learn and go home, she was plugged in to the group. As an outsider the only clues were the hostility for a while, and I chalked it up to me being too standoffish.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 09:53 AM
5

There were three or four women. The class was mostly men. So how much power the class members gave... yea. She could have gotten me injured or jailed at least.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:31 AM
2

For a moment I thought you were saying he was legally allowed to data a 17 year old and have anal.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:10 PM
1

Dude should have learned how to shut up and lawyer up. Unless this is part of his lawyer's strategy... in which case maybe after he is convicted he will have a shot of a new trial based on his lawyer being stupid.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:09 PM
3

Neither police or civilians press charges. Criminal charges are brought by the state as represented by the prosecutor or DA (results may vary from state to state, additional charges may apply and other disclaimer stuff like me not being a lawyer). This applies to at least two states that I know of, and it seems to be the general model. What bad TV shows mean when they say "he/she is not pressing charges" is the person is requesting that there be no charges or refusing to cooperate with the polic…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:08 PM
2

It is blaming the victim because according to the person who wrote that women are victims. They cannot be expected to protect themselves, be responsible for their actions or defend one another. After all they are stupid enough to hang out with men who are so base and stupid that they have to be told not to rape. Making choices like that, you can hardly expect them to look after themselves.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:32 AM
3

Let's stop calling people monsters. I do not say this out of compassion. The evil is committed by human beings who at various times are not differentiated in action from your neighbor, brother or friend. Hyperbole like this is justified... I get it. It feels right say horrible things about the people that did horrible things and announce to the world that you despise them and what they did. But I fear that when we pretend they are not people, we blind ourselves to the evil next door, or in our o…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:34 PM
1

Allow me to recommend living in flyover country.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:56 PM
1

What city was this?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 01:04 AM
2

I think this is actually a look into how the court sees this woman/women; weak willed and lacking the capacity to be accountable for her behavior.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:25 PM
2

Anyone have a mirror?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:41 PM
1

I will hold my breath :) Well, ok I won't. I'll actually just check back in a day or two, see there is no photographic proof and then move on with my life.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:05 AM
0

Well said. The tone is almost right but this just doesn't fit. I would guess troll also. The list format alone...
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:04 AM
23

It isn't that I disagree with your point, it is more that we need strong verifiable cases. If we get caught up in the slander and libel game, we lose. Let the radicals set themselves up for failure. Not us.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:55 PM
4

Google will quickly lead you to articles where people do this. You can see right there. It isn't a GOOD argument, but there is no need to be willfully blind about how it is made.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:30 AM
1

My wife sent me this, and thought it was a bit heavy handed. Perhaps it was, but I hope we see more featuring male and female aggressors and victims.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:08 PM
3

You are saying execution, but since you can't put your finger on it perhaps it is something else. I believe the thing that makes people dislike it is cultural bias. Men admitting that? Cringe.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 11:44 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights26/11/13 12:33 AM
-1

Not talking about attempted rape. This is about rape. This isn't about you fighting the person with the knife to your throat, this is after you were knocked down, kicked senseless and woke up with your hands tied, watching as they start to cut. Except with rape your body will betray you, and you will always and forever after link any feeling of pleasure at another persons touch with the terror, helplessness and pain. EDIT: Before you blow that off, seriously think for a moment about the special …
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:52 PM
-5

Rape and torture take root in the victim, undermining their sense of control over their own body. This isn't about something bad happening, this is about someone else taking control over you body and leaving you helpless as they exert their will over you. You will never forget, and in fact you will never, ever, fail to remember. Any contact and you remember it, relive it. And no. I was not raped, but I do understand.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter