TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NewW0rld Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by NewW0rld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

The UK is really left-wing: culturally, institutionally, in government, in legislation. Going against the prevailing culture is really hard: it's like going against Goliath. It's not a question of men failing to unite together, it's that too few men are against this in the first place, so the ones who are are in the minority and have little political capital on this issue (it's lopsided towards the feminist position).
/r/MensRights18/12/25 07:17 PM
1

If it's bullshit, give reasons otherwise you're full of hot air. Not every man is going to be automatically stronger than any particular woman Not every but in the vast vast majority of cases, which is why, for example, we separate sports competitions by sex, and so few women are in combat roles in the military. I spoke of "proportionally" and "in general", not in absolutes.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:58 PM
-9

The law should be changed; that's a stupid law. Then we can continue pursuing hottie teachers again.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:03 PM
-25

And if you say “okay I hope that happens to your daughter then since you’re okay with it” they’ll call for the woodchipper still. They say that because proportionally there are a lot more cases of an elder male being predatory and abusive, as opposed to an elder female. With more risk being to a girl given a man's physical power, as opposed to a woman's physical power. Finally, the consequences of impregnation are a lot more significant to the pregnant female as opposed to a male who sired. In g…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:00 PM
-9

There's a "double standard" because males and females are different; they behave differently and are built different. And thus they are treated differently. That's perfectly reasonable. I would have loved to get with my teacher if she looked like that. Heck, I fantasised about it countless times as a kid. There would be no harm done to me; only good.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:54 PM
1

That's true, the apps are shallow. Which then makes even more sense to have appearance-focused attributes like height, since the userbase is shallow. The non-shallow people can meet via traditional means; there are plenty of women who are not on Tinder.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 09:08 AM
1

How is it less if they rate 80% of men as unattractive and men don't do that for them. I'd argue it's way way higher for women. You're arguing about a different point. Let's say for example women are interested in a man partner's attributes to these proportions (I'm making these numbers up): 50% income 30% personality 15% strength 5% physical attractiveness Even though women might find most men unattractive as you claim, it doesn't matter for them: because attractiveness is a small component of …
/r/MensRights11/06/25 08:44 AM
0

Wide personal observation of what women and men are interested in. Attractive women are much more desired than ugly women with income, education, DIY skills, etc. Men care about that less. Here are citations I found with GPT if you're interested: Physical Attractiveness Men prioritize physical attractiveness more than women. Women value it too, but less than men overall, and more in short-term contexts. Study: Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 08:25 AM
1

Numerical metrics are wrong because its not only dehumanizing Let's get rid of age as well then? Since numbers are dehumanising somehow. How in the world are numerical attributes dehumanising?! It's the same as writing down blonde, petite, hourglass-figure, etc. Just descriptors. (ironically) it's objectifying men, and normalizing a seemingly random beauty standard that people literally have no control over Normalising that tallness is attractive....? That's already the norm. It's not just a ran…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 08:18 AM
0

Men tend to value physical attractiveness in a woman partner (as opposed to other characteristics like income capacity, education, intelligence, wealth, skills, etc.) more than women tend to in a man partner.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 07:57 AM
1

it allows people to judge you based off your looks. A girl could see a picture of me and decide I LOOK tall enough to pursue. That’s judging me based off my physical appearance. Looks can be deceiving. A cropped and angled photo of a woman can make her look slim, but numerically she's 150lbs. You haven't explained why judging someone from visual appearance is the right way, but judging them from numerical metrics is wrong. I think numbers are a better way to convey a stat like height or weight t…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:35 PM
1

lying makes you look bad Before you said it makes you look good: that when you lied they came "flooding in". height filter is deliberately meant to punish short men That's like saying photos are deliberately meant to punish physically unattractive people. How are photos different to a declaration of height? As a suitor, you use both to judge a person by their physical characteristics. Nobody is "punishing" short men. Height is a reality, and it's a field like the rest: one that people use to fil…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 06:41 PM
0

I see where you’re coming from, but those are all things you willingly put on your profile for others to see. You wouldn’t purposefully put up a bad photo or bio cause you won’t get likes. If you lie in your photos (by photoshopping or catfishing) or in your bio (by describing yourself as something you're not), it's no different to height because you can lie about height, too (as you did). I'm sure Hinge also requires you to add a photo and a bio (and a myriad of other fields when you signup) so…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:44 PM
-4

I don't get the outrage A lot of men salty over women's rejection of them. And salty that unfortunately a lot of women place great emphasis on appearance and physical characteristics in partner selection. (Men do even moreso than women though, IMO).
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:26 PM
1

Elaborate?
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:22 PM
2

Yeah, but then to be logically consistent: let's remove photos, and bio, and everything else that people use to pre-judge whether they expect a person to be a good relationship match.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:18 PM
4

that they want us to die. [...] This is not what they are saying. Did you even read the post? Look at pic 3 and 4. I skipped the rest of your comment since you clearly didn't read the post and are just going on a rant from a preconceived agenda you held in your head.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 11:26 AM
1

The free market speaks for itself: if you don't approach a woman other men will, so she need not approach. We may not like it but it's the system (a free market of romance) that offers the most freedom to everyone.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:00 PM
1

Women on dating apps have the pick of the litter because they outnumber men, so if you can't compete above the 50th percentile you should try to meet women another way.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:59 PM
1

I don't think we're seeing eye to eye...
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:56 PM
1

.... people keep the same fantasies. It's really not anything out of the ordinary to be attracted to a hot woman. That's not something you shed after young adulthood.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:39 PM
1

I had these fantasies as a teenager and I know others had them too, so it's not projecting: people actually have these fantasies and lusts.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:52 PM
1

Teenagers have sexual fantasies, get over it. Have you even ever been a teenager? A kid who is 15 has sexual desires: does that bother you or do you think it's abnormal? Because it's perfectly healthy.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:43 PM
1

Then you're ignorant of the sort of sexual fantasies people commonly have. There's nothing abnormal about being attracted to an attractive woman in your life who happens to be a teacher.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:19 PM
1

Are you joking? Teacher fantasy is a common fantasy, and not just among teenagers. A pervert is one who experiences lust? Then every healthy human being is a pervert.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 05:31 PM
1

Molestation means coerced doesn't it? It means abuse. Here I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the standard deal of boy students having the hots for their teachers.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 11:19 PM
1

I don't care about your anecdotes or anomalies. Men as a general rule have a higher sex drive than women.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 11:17 PM
1

What do you mean not old enough to deal with? What horrible harm befell you? What horrible harm befalls a horny teenager having sex with his teacher? You say that teenagers are most of the time not old enough, yet so many teenagers have sex with each other. That you say it varies person-to-person and 20 years old is not old enough weakens the argument that 16/18 is a hard cutoff, below which great harm is likely to befall a teenage boy.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:43 PM
1

Right, so here with teenage boys they're old enough to know about sex, they're unlikely to be coerced, they can't get pregnant, and they want it really badly! Hence where is the harm? If the teacher was forcing the kid to do it, then that deserves all the bad connotations of real rape. If there was no harm, those connotations do not apply.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 08:49 PM
1

People have desires and wants and chase them all the time, no? And when they achieve them they're generally not disappointed. Are you saying it's wrong to pursue goals and fulfill desires?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:27 PM
1

Nah, I'll keep it and voice support for boys being exempt from child support: that's a travesty.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:26 PM
1

Re-read my comment above where I say that it's rape. To be clear: it's rape because it's statutory rape, which is a definition in law. But the connotations of abuse are not there if a teenager is not pressured or forced into sex; if instead they want it. Teenagers have sex with each other all the time and it's not illegal, so if they can consent to teenagers what's the difference to consenting to an adult? As a boy I would have absolutely loved to have sex with my hot teachers: it would have bee…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:24 PM
1

Horny teenaged boys? If they were girls they’d all “hate sex” of course. Females have lower sex drives than males, so yes. Also, females will be further put off due to the risk of pregnancy and the fact that their mate is physically stronger than them so they may not have full control. And have you missed the articles about these boys paying child support under court orders? I said "just as long [...] I don't see where the problem". I agree that it's a travesty and should be changed. And it happ…
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:19 PM
1

Imagine that: boys and girls are different! What a revelation! How did you go your life without knowing that?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:14 PM
1

I "don't give a shit"--as you crassly put it--because it's different for boys than for girls. Boys are different to girls: this should be obvious. Harm to boys is unlikely, and for girls it's more likely, for aforementioned reasons. If there is no harm, there is nothing for me to "give a shit" about. Personally, when I was a boy, I fantasised having sex with the hot teachers in my school; it would've been a dream come true. A lot of teenage boys are the same.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:14 PM
1

If you're familiar with the argument, why did you call it "weird", i.e. strange? Who cares frat boy or not? It has no bearing on the argument. When I was a boy I fantasised about getting it on with my teachers; many boys are the same, it would be a fantasy fulfilled.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:29 AM
1

Fair enough, but my point still holds that this is for forced rape: All respondents completed a measure of nonconsensual sexual interactions including the use of three aggressive strategies (physical force, exploitation of the man's incapacitated state, and verbal pressure) and three forms of unwanted sexual contact I am talking about "statutory rape" where the boy is over the moon to get to have sex with the teacher he has the hots for. Quite different to forced, exploitative or pressured sex l…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:54 PM
-5

Boys and girls are different: boys have a much higher sex drive, especially teenage boys, so with a girl there is a more likely possibility that she was pressured into it or deceived, because usually she does not want it. Secondly, the girl student can get pregnant and that's a whole host of trouble, whereas a boy cannot get pregnant so there is no harm in that regard.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:46 PM
1

OK, is that statutory rape or forced rape? It's the latter isn't it? Big difference for considering what is "harmful". And it's the classic "correlation is not necessarily causation" dilemma: it could be that men generally are more depressed than women, etc. etc. But I'll grant a correlation is an indicator.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:12 PM
-2

If they're not admitting it, how do you know they are harmed?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 10:03 PM
1

That's a travesty and should be corrected.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:03 PM
-15

Are affected by sex in a good way, you mean? We're talking about horny teenage boys after all. If she gets pregnant, what do you mean what happens? Mother can choose to birth a baby or abort. If she chooses to keep the baby despite the father being out of the picture the blame is on her; she could've done that with any sperm donor, boy or man. Just as long as the father doesn't have to pay child support when he becomes an adult I don't see where the problem will be exactly.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 08:51 PM
0

Paedophillia is for pre-pubescent. 14 is post-.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 08:24 PM
-12

Rape has connotations of abuse; it's not even proper rape: it's statutory rape. So honest question and Devil's advocate: since lads are loving it and there's no harm done to them what is the problem exactly?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 08:22 PM
2

Popularity doesn’t determine inherent rightness (see feminist ideology) nor does unpopularity and shaming serve as an impetus to determine wrongness (see the members of this very sub). I never claimed that popularity determines rightness. I agree that some things that society shames should not be shameful. My claim is that simping is something that should be shamed; it is no good. That simps won't be changed my shaming: we disagree on that. Shaming makes people reevaluate their ways and people a…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 12:34 AM
2

Anyone with ideas that are shamed in person can easily go online and be validated. Validated by some online fake friends but then when they inevitably go into the real world they're not validated by family, real-life friends, work mates and any other social groups the person is a part of. IMO when you're an adult it's your responsibility to educate yourself. If your family and the rest of society thinks your acts or views are repulsive, that should give you impetus to research and meditate on yo…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 07:38 PM
1

The purpose of shame as a societal pressure is to deter people from engaging in acts that run counter to the society's values. Some shamed men will go hide and continue in shameful activities, but others will take up the challenge of bettering themselves. Not shaming is not far off from normalising: if there is no deterrent, more people will engage in this behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 05:23 PM
1

We as a society have destroyed spaces for men to hang out, are overworking men to the point that they have no time to hang out, and our gender roles regarding emotional vulnerability and the need to be competitive make it hard for men to connect with each other. And that’s on top of constantly vilifying their very existence through education and media to the point of self loathing. The thing is most men manage to not act the way OnlyFans simps do. Whatever societal pressures men might be facing …
/r/MensRights16/12/23 04:41 PM
1

Be that as it may, to be unshackled from male control that has lasted so long would feel emancipating don't you think? We've reached a stage in society where women can live independently of men, and have more influence in the societal and political spheres. So that change in the balance of power is manifesting in the ways that you described in your post. All IMO of course.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:58 PM
0

Taking the macro view, it's a backlash to men being the dominant sex for the last 7 millenia of human civilization, during which men exerted great control over females.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 10:41 PM
0

wut? You would want a partner who has ED?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 09:24 PM
-9

You can be loyal to a relationship physically and not be on a fast track to get married. There exists rational middle ground between being a hookup artist and needing to move towards marriage now. You barely even know someone unless you've been seeing them for two years. Yeah, that's called boyfriend/girlfriend; after you dated you agree to enter an exclusive relationship. When you're dating you're still not that. Simply talking is fine, but actively going out and sleeping with multiple dudes is…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 11:48 AM
-11

Some of these points I agree with, but some others are IMO unreasonable on your part: Women who talk to many men at one time [...] then freak out when a dude cuts them off when he finds out they're talking to other men. Dating in series is much much more time inefficient than lining up a bunch of dates simultaneously with a few prospects that you want to know more about. When you're dating you're not in a relationship; there is no commitment: you're sussing each other out to see if you would be …
/r/MensRights28/06/23 10:37 AM
23

This is such a dumb term. Shakespeare is a content creator then.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/22 12:14 AM
5

Damn, man. How can this be the most upvoted comment? No one will take this sub seriously.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/21 10:53 AM
3

In dismissing the women's claim that they are paid less for the same work, Klausner pointed to differences in the structure of the men's and women's contracts — contracts to which they agreed in collective bargaining. "The WNT [Women's National Team] rejected an offer to be paid under the same pay-to-play structure as the MNT [Men's National Team] and ... the WNT was willing to forgo higher bonuses for other benefits, such as greater base compensation and the guarantee of a higher number of cont…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 01:08 AM
4

You don't like equality of the sexes?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 12:24 AM
2

Not to mention they use filters that change body shape.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/21 07:01 PM
1

Firstly, notice he didn't use force. He threatened with potential harm just like the perp could've caused potential harm. Secondly, according to your logic, you wouldn't shoot a perp who is running at you with a knife or pointing a gun at you, because you only have fear of potential harm at that point, not actual harm.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/21 10:28 PM
1

Know what? The guy approaching from the rear could have easily happened to be wielding a knife or some other weapon (or even just put the officer in a chokehold); the officer doesn't know that so he takes a precaution.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/21 10:04 PM
1

Yeah but bro how many women that you bring in are fine with having their sex acts recorded by the dude?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 08:26 PM
0

Sure, but there are general patterns.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/20 06:54 AM
11

The soyboy stereotype is actually true xD Single man took on a whole crowd of those goons that try act to tough.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/10/20 12:17 PM
1

Why can't it be both? That she asked for help and was rejected, and thus had no help? The two don't contradict each other. Please understand that in English (I'm assuming you are a German speaker and English isn't your first language), there is a big difference between "He didn't pay for me" and "He didn't want to pay for me". The first is factual: you don't need to know a person's intention. Whereas the second you cannot know without asking.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/06/20 04:16 PM
1

Well, yes it does. "No one I dated wanted to make payments" implies that she asked and was told no. There isn't really a way to know whether your partners want to make payments for you or not, without asking.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 10:02 PM
2

Buddy, you give this sub a bad name.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 09:29 PM
9

Wrong to assume that when your request was to order, and not to order and pay.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 06:56 PM
1

I explained to you why it is true, but you didn't respond to why you think it's false, so I don't think you really have an argument. Whether a statement is trashy or false is mutually exclusive: if something is trashy doesn't mean it's false, I think you're confused.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/19 03:16 PM
1

It doesn't matter! Truth doesn't matter? A true PPD would be calling her trash, and leaving it at that. What personal world do you live in where making an ad hominem attack is better than backing up your point of view with reason?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 07:20 PM
2

I hate to pile on an opposing view in this subreddit for fear of appearing biased, but for every Ada Lovelace there were a hundred renowned male computer scientists. For every building created by women there were a hundred buildings created by men. It is not hyperbolic to claim that most of the things mentioned in the tweet were indeed created by men. The 1% contribution by women is by comparison rather insignificant.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/19 11:31 PM
2

I'm not sure if this comment is being satirical, but, in case it's not, you took part in a distasteful joke that denigrated an entire people. Do not be surprised when your disrespect is returned in kind: you reap what you sow.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/19 11:19 PM
-2

She didn't know she was not supposed to stand there. Is there any other situation you can think of where a a visitor (to a company or an organisation) doesn't follow the rules 100%, that they get physically assaulted for that? This is horrible manners and very ungentlemanly and reflects poorly on the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/19 03:29 PM
1

If they don't fit the sub, report those posts. This post fits the sub so it stayed. If someone is bringing valued content to this subreddit, via their YouTube channel or otherwise, more power to them.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 02:53 PM
1

It will hurt the community to fragment the subreddits any further. The content you wish can be already suitably posted in /r/sjwinaction and /r/kotakuinaction
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 02:42 PM
3

Good point. Could I ask why he's such a big target of neo Nazis? I did not know that.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 02:12 PM
2

Having just 2 modes--life with or without parole--would still be Draconian IMO, because you would have relatively less severe offences like kissing someone underage carry the same punishment as having full-blown penetrative sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/18 09:16 PM
3

I don't know, to me the difference in severity of forcefully anally raping someone versus letting them touch your boobs seems obvious. For one thing, the former is physically damaging, and carries the risk of passing life changing diseases are impregnation. I also imagine it's less traumatic.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/18 08:52 PM
6

A "sliding scale", how you put it, is the alternative to Draconian law. It's exactly why you don't get the lethal injection for stealing a chocolate bar at the gas station. Why not set the punishment for any rule breaking to getting the death penalty? Do you understand why that would be unproductive?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/18 08:21 PM
0

Why could you not explain why it's cringe worthy? Back it up
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/17 05:02 PM
2

if someone in full mask stops you in the middle of the road, you sure would invite him for tee. for all I know that woman feared for her life It's broad daylight on an extremely busy street. She is locked safe in her car. Notice that once he stopped her, he did nothing aggressive. She could have just stayed in the car there and waited for the police. What you have said is totally unreasonabel.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/17 04:38 PM
1

How did she interfere exactly? By putting a hat on top of the arrestee? How does that interfere with the police taking the criminal into custody?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 09:25 PM
0

Yes it is stunning that he fought back considering he was in the wrong, given that he was witholding private property belonging to the woman, after being given ample warning to return said property.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 08:30 PM
3

Copy. Backup en route: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM2KJO1w-kk
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 08:20 PM
1

The point is to be compensated for damages rendered, in this case gross mental and emotional distress, risk of STD transmission, etc. It's fair that the party that caused damage makes reparations to the party who sustained it.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 08:05 PM
1

How in your head is "punching her out" not an escalation over what she was doing, which was slapping his torso and a light kick to the torso? Not that I buy your escalation argument at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/16 07:55 PM
8

The daughter, who is only 19, now has a criminal record. That's pretty harsh considering it's for a dumb, teenage mistake.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/16 11:02 PM
1

She's being a baby about it. It's a glorified game show. "I've been through SO much!" Pray tell, what atrocities have you witnessed during your stay? It might be entertaining for you, but it's no cakewalk for the participants: everybody is focused on winning; you can't just be your relaxed and normal self. She was selected from hundreds of applicants, she made it to the final, she was planning what she was going to spend the money on like it was already in her pocket. A chance of a lifetime. Pla…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/16 11:15 AM
1

Or you know... she cried because she was full of emotion and crying is a natural manifestation of this?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/16 01:54 PM
2

If you don't criticize or debate things you get an echo chamber. If people don't challenge their own views and beliefs they start to believe in some crazy--and often stupid--shit. A comment was made by someone who cares about the community, but doesn't like the way it's going. He posts his criticism here in the hope that the community will be steered to his liking: this is a fundamental part of how communities work.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 03:05 PM
-7

Hahahahha "joke". wow. Go re-read your comment again and count on your toes how many brain cells it took you to come up with that; I don't want to be picking on the mentally disabled.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 08:08 AM
-8

Funny, because in my first post I say that I like the content, it's just that the comment section is filled with imbeciles.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/15 07:57 AM
-30

The fact that it's not in the negatives, or simply ignored, is enough. A comment like this wouldn't see the light of day on a civil sub. Yes it's one comment, but it's representative of the pattern I've noticed.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 06:58 PM
-27

Ah, another thoughtful, intelligent comment to showcase my point. Much obliged
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 06:36 PM
-49

Anyone who thinks this sub doesn't have an anti-woman circlejerk,, please look at the comment I'm replying too and how many upvotes it has. It really is laughable that hateful, moronic and wholly meritless comments like this are so common and popular here. There are subs where the comments are not worth reading--on par with Youtube comments--and this sub is one of them. I still like the content, just that much of the userbase consists of the lowest-common denominator, like this fella here :)
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 05:38 PM
3

so wasted
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 09:18 AM
3

I thought that by the "book" he meant the law. An article said he was suspended because "violation of athletic department policy". But I think he would've been suspended for any other act that caused as much negative media attention, because what I think they're trying to avoid is bad publicity to the team and the university, brought on by the impending trial so I disagree that it's a pussy pass. The woman is not off the hook and he hasn't been convicted of anything yet .
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/15 04:03 PM
6

Except they threw the book What are you talking about? The case hasn't even gone to court yet.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/15 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter