TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Newleafto Archive

View 0 posts and 277 comments by Newleafto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
48

Question she asked: where are all the single men? Answer: staying away from you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/11/25 10:10 PM
1

If she isn’t asking you out, paying for the date, paying for your uber, and buying you a nice gift for your time in going out with her, is she even a woman? Never settle guys, remember you’re the prize - drizzle drizzle.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/25 11:05 AM
–

That’s up to the woman, but there’s obvious clues. If he makes her feel wanted, respected and he treats her well, then that’s obviously a contender.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 06:08 PM
–

There’s no shortage of great guys. Men who aren’t abusive or mean are quite common. The “right guy” who meets ALL of a woman’s standards is relatively uncommon, but that’s not the problem. The basic problem with the “right guy” is that he has standards of his own that most women can’t meet, so when you meet the right guy for you you’re almost certainly not the right girl for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 06:03 PM
-6

“Some people like eating just bread and water instead of meat and vegetables” - translation: nobody actually likes bread and water, but some people are too poor to buy good food. Some women are single and childless and they make the best of it. They would be much happier in a loving family, but they can’t find a the man they want. Why? Because they’re looking for the man they WANT instead of the man they NEED, and the men they WANT don’t want them (they’re in their own personal purgatory).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:05 PM
0

Why is it so hard for a lot of these women to find someone they’re compatible with? It’s not. There is a great abundance of wonderful men available and any woman could find a man with whom she could build a happy life. Every woman has met several such men; however, most of those men don’t meet the shallow expectations which many (not all) women have developed. Many (most?) women eventually mature sufficiently to discard shallow expectations, but many don’t. That’s why I encourage all women to ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 01:55 PM
-1

Absolutely agree. I think a great many women should remain single. A lot of women don’t have what it takes to form a happy relationship and have children. Being married and having children necessarily means putting other people’s needs ahead of your own - not all the time, but often enough that if you’re a self centred woman it will end up being a bad experience for everyone involved. Holding onto a man is difficult and they’ll eventually leave if it doesn’t work out. Unfortunately, children are…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 01:43 PM
-1

You are making the huge mistake of giving a crap about the opinions of others, particularly about the opinions of man haters. Exactly what is wrong with men pursuing their interests? Nothing whatsoever. Will some people feel threatened or offended that men are trying to meet women with the intention of “getting laid” when those men navigate society? WHO CARES if they do. The people being offended fundamentally hate men in general and male sexuality in general. There is no point appeasing those p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:37 AM
1

It calls out the shallow, sexualized, or fantasy-driven depictions of women in media. Fair enough. It’s a real problem. No it’s not a real problem, it’s bullshit. Men being dragged off to war against their will is a real problem. Little boys dying in cobalt mines in the Congo is a real problem. Men dying in industrial accidents, sleeping on the streets, committing suicide and living shorter harsher lives is a real problem. The world is awash with real, life shortening, fatal and injurious real p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:17 PM
1

Translation please. Most of us can’t read German.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 09:15 AM
1

A tiny percentage of men doing anything bad is enough to trigger femcel lunatics to hate men even more than they normally do. Normal women are not so bigoted.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 02:58 AM
5

Some men may lie, but some men lying isn’t sufficient to change the behaviour of most women. To argue that men lying is causing women to behave differently is to directly imply that it’s MOST men (or a large percentage of men). It’s like the misandric statement “men are trash” - built into that statement is that all or most men are trash, not a small subset of men are trash.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 01:58 PM
7

He’s getting down voted because what he’s saying isn’t true and it’s misandric as hell. Overwhelmingly men are honest about their political leanings and there isn’t a huge amount of men “pretending to be left wing”. What is happening is that many men view the world slightly differently than many women do because many men are differently positioned than many women. What is politically “left wing” or progressive to many men (because it centres the issues of men) is viewed as “conservative” by many…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 01:25 PM
7

70% of drivers consider themselves better than average when it comes to driving - obviously they’re wrong. Self-identification is bullshit - it literally means nothing. Lots of young women “identify as bisexual”, but very few of those women would ever go down on another woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 02:51 AM
13

In Gen Z, 28.5% of women and 10.6% of men identify as LGBTQ. All that shows is that women are either three times more delusional than men or that women are three times more likely to be vulnerable to suggestion. LGBT people represent no more than 5% of the general population. That’s based on actual living relationships, namely marriages, intimate cohabitation, adoptions, etc. plenty of young women and teenagers CLAIM they’re LGBT, but they’re not. Furthermore, the whole notion that women can’t f…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 02:42 AM
3

How do we report that post to Reddit? This has to be targeted harassment which is against Reddit’s rules.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 01:36 PM
22

The biggest problem with misandry is the harm and violence it inflicts on men as a result of the pathological lack of empathy it generates against men. Misandry is the reason men die in mining accidents, die on construction sites, die in war and get maimed in factories. Misandry is the reason why society continually puts men in harm’s way while simultaneously attempting to provide safer environments for women. Misandry kills vastly more men than misogyny kills women, so much so that men live sig…
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:36 PM
15

Many are a lover of self now and don’t care about other human beings. The depth of their narcissism cannot be measured.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/25 11:50 AM
7

Excellent work!
/r/MensRights30/05/25 05:24 PM
10

There’s no therapist that can cure insanity.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:24 PM
27

It’s an incompetent and potentially dangerous thing to do. If I see an email addressed to my secretary and I don’t see my name because it’s way down a list of names or because I’m just copied on the email, I might assume it’s not really ment for me and I might not open it because I have too much to do and I don’t have time to read a mountain of emails not specifically addressed to me. That’s not microfeminism, that’s micro-aggressions bordering on man hating bigotry.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:40 AM
7

Masturbation. It’s been demonstrated that Women who masturbate regularly are much more likely to have orgasms during sex. Nearly half of all women have either never masturbated or have done so only rarely. If an individual woman doesn’t know what it takes to bring her to orgasm, why would the man she is with? It’s doubly difficult because many of these same women steadfastly refuse to communicate with the man as to what’s working for them and what isn’t. It’s almost as if these women expect men …
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:53 PM
42

She’s butt ugly and can’t figure out why she can’t find a man she’s attracted to. It’s very simple. The men she is attracted to have eyes and can see she’s butt ugly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/25 02:16 PM
3

I need a direct correlation on that. Feel free to use internet search engines. Also, those who believe in the mythical “patriarchy” and the bizarre supposition that “misogyny kills women” (as opposed to individuals) are quite content with implied correlations pulled out of a feminist’s ass, so why should you require “direct correlations”. Regardless, here’s some direct evidence that society treats men’s lives as less valuable than women’s lives. Many municipalities direct public transit busses t…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 10:11 PM
4

The safety regulations are lessened when men’s lives are at stake - society is less interested in the safety of men because we are seen as disposable and of less value than women.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 11:29 AM
5

Misandry kills more men than misogyny kills women by a huge margin: 95%+ of all people who die in workplace accidents are men 95%+ of all people who die prematurely from workplace exposure to toxic chemicals are men men’s life expectancy is between 5-10 years lower than women’s
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:04 PM
2

I know a woman in her 50’s who is single with no skills, no job and no money who literally lives “boy friend” to “boy friend” with a little help from welfare. Her life is a nightmare because no man wants to wife her up so she just stays with one boyfriend for a few months then moves on to the next. I can’t imagine living like that so late in life.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:25 AM
24

Even if he’s anti-X I’ll still want him if he’s hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 07:37 PM
65

Absolutely. Just peruse “twoX”, “trollx”, all the “feminist” subreddits and the dating/relationship subs - they are filled with bitter femcels hating on men.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 10:13 AM
115

Rejecting someone isn’t being cruel. It’s nothing bad at all, it’s just part of life. The point is that a significant percentage of women (probably a majority) have very fragile egos and can’t handle rejection in an adult way. For all their talk about women being “in touch with their feelings”, the reality is that women are generally less able to handle rejection and failure than men. Virtually all men have been dealing with rejection and failure all their lives while many women have never been …
/r/MensRights21/02/25 10:08 AM
21

It had the desired effect - promoting the notion that men and masculinity are so terrible that even a boy’s natural penis must be surgically mutilated to be acceptable.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 01:01 AM
9

Tell me about it! My buddy and I were at a restaurant the other night when these two women walked in, looked briefly in our direction and took seats about two tables away from us. If that wasn’t enough of a hint, they both started laughing quietly to each other while they looked over the menus. Then they ordered drinks! Not just any drinks, they ordered really seductive DIET DRINKS!!! Then they had salads - and get this - NO SALAD DRESSING!!! I mean come on, my buddy and I just wanted a quiet di…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 04:10 AM
78

My god, women already take the initiative with men ALL THE TIME. This is what a woman typically does to initiate things with a man: Places herself within 3-5 meters (10-16 feet) of the man she’s interested in. Raises her left eyebrow about 2 mm (1/8 inch) in a seductive manner. Her eyes will moisten slightly. She will subtly touch her left elbow with her right index finger. Then (and this is the most obvious and aggressive step) she will look away from her target and place her face into a blank …
/r/MensRights15/02/25 09:37 PM
5

I’m not saying you did, I’m saying the “study” purports to claim this which is wrong. It’s like all those studies claiming women do more work at home than men or that “1 in 4” women are sexually assaulted or raped. Those studies actually measure women’s opinions, not actual verified facts. Women may believe they work more but that doesn’t mean they actually do.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 04:09 PM
20

This study doesn’t show that 80% of women are sexually harassed. To make such a finding they would have to examine the number of actual verified cases of sexual harassment, which they didn’t do. Instead they just asked a group of women if they were sexually harassed after telling them that sexual harassment includes behaviour as innocuous as reading jokes on the internet or “being stared at”. The study only shows that 80% of women THINK they’re so attractive that they get sexually harassed. This…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 11:57 AM
24

It’s ironic because she blurts out an unsolicited opinion about men volunteering unsolicited opinions while his opinion (“well actually”), being a reaction to her voiced opinion, is a solicited opinion. Basically, she just wants men to shut up and stoically endure her verbal abuse.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 02:01 PM
13

It means you’re underestimating your attractiveness. 10 dates from a dating app is well above average for a man.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:57 AM
12

Men have every right to talk about their experiences and to express how they feel about them. They also have every right to lower their opinions about women as a result of their experiences and to discuss that as well. If you don’t like that, then you’re free not to participate in the discussion.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:53 AM
1

I hear this all the time, and technically it’s correct, that women appreciate other things in men besides looks such as humour, intelligence, confidence, kindness etc.. The “problem” is that while those characteristics are desired (by both genders), visual stimulation is our primary means of determining who we are attracted to, particularly in the initial stages. It takes a conversation or two to determine if someone is intelligent and humorous, it takes much more to determine the rest.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:31 PM
26

This is just my opinion, but I think that women have the incredible privilege of gaining a great deal of attention for a relatively small amount of investment into their appearance. I think this fact tempts women to spend more time and effort into their appearance because they receive almost immediate positive feedback when they put on makeup, show cleavage/curves, wear flattering clothes, etc. Like many things, this causes a feedback loop: more attention -> more effort -> increased attention ->…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:00 PM
20

I knew a white privileged feminist with the same sort of attitude. She was extremely privileged - wealthy, private schools, private tutors, University tuition and residency paid by parents, annual fabulous vacations, house and car bought and paid for by parents, never worked summer jobs or part time, private golf club memberships, fancy restaurants, lots of spending money, never wanting for anything, PLUS she got GENDER SPECIFIC privileges (women executive programs, women entrepreneurs associati…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:55 AM
12

Don’t go to r /dating and r /relationships to ask undatable femcels for dating advice. If you need advice on caring for herds of cats, then those are good sources of detailed personal experience.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 10:50 PM
9

All this hate and nonsense about a disagreement about childish make-believe bullshit! It’s like seriously taking sides in slap fight between Star Trek fans v. Star Wars fans over whether Luke Skywalker would win a fight against Mr. Spock. It’s all bullshit! (Besides, Popeye would beat both their asses after eating a can of spinach).
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:23 PM
29

So either there is something you need to work on to not be so generally off-putting … That is a very toxic and horrible thing to say. It is a typical anti-male comment one would expect out of a bitter undatable femcel. By your own admission, women have varied tastes, so it’s quite possible to be a completely decent, accomplished, respectful and wonderful man and STILL have difficulty meeting women because of a hundred (probably insignificant) factors beyond his control (height, hair colour, faci…
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:09 PM
46

Hold up! Are you saying the harassment and bullying this man was subjected to was all over some disagreement over a bunch of make believe fictional bullshit? This man was effectively harassed to death because he imagined that Harry Potter (or some other character in some other fictional story) was secretly vegetarian (or bisexual, disabled or something else) and had a secret relationship with Ron Weasley where they would never eat meat (or something else equally stupid)? Jesus Fuck! There was no…
/r/MensRights30/01/25 12:38 PM
24

The laws of thermodynamics and statistics don’t care about equity. If it’s a “male dominated” field (meaning 90%+ of the people VOLUNTARILY in the field are men), then its virtually impossible to have 50:50 men/women in the department unless the department is very small (say 2-4 people). You can do this with involuntary participation, which is why you can get 50% of soldiers in the military to be women if you let men volunteer for service but force women into the military by instituting a draft …
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:21 PM
18

I’ve never seen a rape, murder, bank robbery, or kidnapping, so I guess those things don’t happen.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:06 PM
1

I don’t think it’s a “liberal” thing per say. I live in the urban core of a huge liberal city (the most liberal city in North America), and lots of people here own/drive F150’s - they are quite common. There are loads of people here who drive small cute cars (I used to own a Miata for years) and SUV’s are popular (we have two). My neighbour owns an F150 and a Fiat Spider (like an Italian Miata). I think some people who don’t have much life experience look down on truck owners and assume they’re …
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:03 AM
10

Yes, they do. Lots of women own/drive F150’s, and lots of men mock anyone who does. Stupidity is not gendered.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:07 PM
12

I don’t understand the truck hate. I don’t want a truck because I don’t really need one, but I clearly see the appeal of them. Versatile, utilitarian and, if you need to carry large loads, they are great. The F150 is particularly useful and they’re the #1 selling vehicle in Canada/USA. It’s basically the most vehicle with the most utility for the least amount of money that you can get. Why hate them or the people who buy them?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:05 PM
44

Don’t you Americans have a constitutionally guaranteed right to tell people to fuck off if they bug you? It’s your patriotic duty to tell those people to bugger off.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:18 PM
15

My wife and I went to Disney World once - the magic kingdom - no single man would enjoy it. It was grossly overcrowded, swelteringly hot, insanely long lines, insufficient seating, screaming kids, frustrated parents. Truly a once in a lifetime experience (as in NEVER AGAIN).
/r/MensRights17/01/25 06:10 PM
-1

Assumption - to assume. A S S U M E. When you assume you make an ASS out of U and ME.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 11:53 AM
1

They will tell you: “that’s different because patriarchy” - just see the other reply to my comment.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:01 PM
2

For goodness sake, women literally ran whole governments multiple times over the centuries. Queen Elizabeth I was the absolute dictator of England for decades and Queen Victoria literally ruled the British Empire during the industrial revolution. Women have had ample opportunities and time to build the world, but they chose not to. Even today the vast majority of technology is developed by men (virtually all of it) and virtually every tech startup is created by men. There are virtually no women …
/r/MensRights08/01/25 07:58 PM
58

Not all men invent society changing technology, build buildings, build large multinational companies, start car companies, build communication networks, discover new scientific laws, liberate oppressed people……, but it’s always men who do those things.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 11:29 PM
7

He got elected by painting his political opponents as radical racists, sexists, homophobes and white nationalists. In a country like Canada with a large proportion of immigrants (over 50% of the people in Toronto are immigrants, including myself), this resonates. When people pointed out he was incompetent or doing a bad job, he would yell racism loudly. After 6/8 years, this has worn thin. There is relatively little actual racism in Canada, and the fact that immigrants are moving strongly toward…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 11:29 AM
12

I think you miss-understand. You asked “what should women do for the male loneliness epidemic”, I suggested women should shut the fuck up. Meaning women should shut up and listen to what men have to say about it instead of making it all about themselves, patriarchy and “toxic masculinity”. Women, particularly feminists, seem to have a lot to say about men’s loneliness and very little of it is helpful.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:35 AM
10

Shut the fuck up?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 09:46 PM
16

She claims her husband is a great catch - handsome, charismatic, charming and successful. Obviously he’s too good for her and she knows it.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 11:29 PM
7

AOL is still a thing?
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:47 AM
10

You tell them it’s a problem with their perspective by pointing out these things: But not nearly on the same scale Indeed, a few women have built companies, created technology and built societies, but not nearly on the same scale as men - men are so industrious, smart, and focused that we built virtually everything in society. Men aren't afraid to go out at night like women are Indeed, despite being several times MORE likely to be victims of violence, men go out while women cower in fear of the …
/r/MensRights31/12/24 11:53 AM
11

There are decent women (I married one), but you’re unlikely to meet one in a “woman centred” space. Those environments are filled with misandrists and femcels who sugar coat their bigotry with “feminism”.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 12:33 PM
19

You are correct. The femosphere is saturated with femcels who are deselecting themselves from marriage/life over some imaginary “patriarchy”. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 12:25 PM
48

There’s a difference between satire and toxic callousness. Those comments are not sarcastic, nor are they made in jest. They are toxic and bigoted comments from people who are deeply hateful. It’s like a group of KKK clansmen “joking” about shooting black people - not funny and not sarcastic.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 12:12 AM
4

Read that guy’s post carefully - half the men he met tried to sexually assaulted him? BULLSHIT! Half of all men are not only sexual assaulters, they’re GAY sexual assaulters, and they all want him? WEAPONS GRADE BULLSHIT! He’s suffering from some delusional illness that causes him to believe he’s some super desirable guy who every man lusts after. I’ve seen this in women, usually unattractive women who think large groups of men are stalking them, but this is the first guy I’ve heard about who ha…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/24 11:29 AM
8

A polar bear will devour you even if you’re Bruce Lee. When it comes to bears: If it’s black, fight back. If it’s brown, hit the ground. If it’s white, say good night.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:43 PM
12

I understand where you’re coming from, and I agree with you, but it would be vastly better for all of society if along with self defence, kids were also educated in self discipline and impulse control. Most violence is the result of poor impulse control and a lack of self discipline. Impulse control and self discipline also greatly improve individual lives. It’s unlikely to happen because feminists seem to think that self discipline is a form of “toxic masculinity” and these feminists control ed…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:32 PM
13

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. This is an extreme example of the well documented phenomenon of women seeking revenge on men who have rejected them. It is not rare, and less extreme examples are quite common. The phenomenon usually takes the form of attacks on the reputation of the rejecting man (target) such as slander or false accusations of rape, assault or other bad behaviour. It often takes the form of vandalism against the target’s property or place of work/residence. It also manif…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 11:47 AM
-22

We don’t live in a matriarchy. We don’t live in a gynocentric society. We don’t live in a patriarchy. We don’t live in a dystopian capitalist society, or a dystopian socialist society. We live in a world which is much worse. We live in an imperfect meritocracy filled with cowards where 99% of our problems are the direct result of our own choices, actions and fears. It’s horrible because we ourselves are entirely to blame for almost all of our suffering and we ourselves are entirely responsible f…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 08:34 PM
8

conduct yourself with the self entitlement of an unemployed white woman. Reddit proverb
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:01 PM
44

That’s different because patriarchy! 🤡 /s
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:30 PM
4

Brilliant.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:29 AM
29

It’s been my observation that DEI benefits privileged white women more than anyone else. I doubt black men benefit at all from DEI. By the time they hire all the privileged white women, there are only a few spots left to distribute to black and Asian women.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 09:34 AM
5

If we can get all men of all ethnicities and orientations into a single political movement we could change the world into a better place. Wars would end (we are ones dying in them), hard jobs would be safer and better paying (we are the ones working them), and injustice would end (we are the ones suffering nearly all the injustice). Let’s make that happen!
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:37 PM
1

Guys, guys, guys, as secretary adjunct to the Supreme Patriarch let me remind you of article 6 of the Oath of Allegiance we all swore when we joined The Patriarchy: Article 6: Never stick your dick in a feminist (even if she’s got huge tits). Sex with a feminist (yes that includes blow jobs) is strictly prohibited. Besides, why the hell would you ever want to?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:37 PM
6

I agree completely. As a former leftist myself, I’m surprised to find myself agreeing that it’s the “right” that actually tries to appeal to the working class. I’m also surprised that it’s the right that’s against war (that started under Trump). In many ways, the left and right have exchanged places. That’s why many “right wing war mongers” supported Kamala Harris and many unions supported Trump. The world has turned upside down.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:57 PM
15

Unfortunately, that’s what it’s become. I remember when the left was about working class people getting a fair share of the wealth they helped to create. That died out sometime in the 1980s and since 2010 or so, it’s been completely taken over by academics and “petty elitists” (mostly well paid government employees) who actually despise the working class.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:06 PM
42

Basically, it will be business as usual - pudgy blue haired women getting pump and dumped by “right wing” men then giving perfectly reasonable left wing men a hard and angry NO!
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:39 AM
85

I urge you to take a look at these “left wing” twoX women. Do they impress you as actually left wing? Where is their support for working class men who endure 97% of all workplace fatalities and injuries? Where is their outrage at all the men being forced into military servitude in the wars which their presidential candidates support? Where is their opposition to genocide? It’s nowhere. THEY ARE’NT LEFT WING. They are privileged and self consumed women incapable of empathy and self reflection. Th…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:29 AM
2

They say it’s mens fault.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:26 AM
18

Another possibility is that these men see the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and how eagerly politicians like Biden, Harris and Liz Cheney were working to expand those wars. They then think “No. I don’t want to be forced to fight in a war. I won’t vote for a warmonger.”
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:17 PM
49

Don’t be so insensitive. These women are terrified because the Democrats promised them that Trump would be taking away all their rights and would lock them all up into fascist sex camps as unpaid sex workers. I will be disappointed if Trump reneges on these promises the Democrats made. I was looking forward to free backrubs. /s 🤡
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:19 PM
8

I for one welcome our new fascist overlords and look forward to the mass incarceration of women into nazi styled birthing camps that the Democrats promised me Trump would set up after he won the election. (This is obviously meant as sarcasm)
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:02 PM
60

When men commit crimes they do it because "men are bad". When women commit crimes it’s because ”men are bad”. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:53 PM
7

It’s not a scientific study. Asking people a bunch of multiple choice questions is not a scientific methodology, especially if the people being asked the questions know (or can easily conclude) why they’re being asked questions. You wouldn’t ask members of the KKK if they hate black people because they won’t tell you the truth. A scientific inquiry would test peoples BEHAVIOUR in response to external stimulus and match that to a control group. Those being tested would not even know they are bein…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:57 PM
4

It kind of makes sense. Women (XX chromosomes) get a ton of attention. Virtually every biological woman can get as much sex as she wants and has tremendous sexual power, but trans women struggle hugely with that (even more than biological men). There appears to be a lot of envy by trans women towards “cis” women over the sexual power cis women have. So it’s not surprising that some trans women have lots of fantasies of randomly taking men (or being taken by men). It’s a coping mechanism.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:16 PM
8

Being a single woman at 40 is sad. Being a single man at 40 is great.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 07:50 AM
102

Exactly. They don’t view men as people they want to love and cherish, but objects they want to posses and exploit. Good women want a man to love, not a man to own.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 10:35 AM
18

If we measured maturity by the willingness to pick up a tool and risk your life to earn enough to support your family, then men clearly mature well before women. Source: 8 year old boys digging out cobalt ore in the Congo to power everyone’s smart phone.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 10:30 AM
230

I’ve been hearing women complain about there not being any good men for 45+ years. The plain and obvious truth is that the world is saturated with wonderful, kind, good, hardworking and attractive men - but all those wonderful men have one thing in common - they want nothing to do with those women. It’s really that simple. Good women have no trouble finding suitable husbands and having a family. They have literally been doing that for all of eternity.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 10:13 AM
15

Expect to receive praise from flabbergasted men.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:31 AM
4

As a wise man said “If shit was worth anything, poor people wouldn’t be born with assholes” (Eddie Murphy).
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:34 PM
20

The cost argument is ridiculous. Criminal background checks and credit checks cost money, but nearly every bank, government agency and large business does them for potential employees. The people who use cost as an excuse to prevent universal paternity testing are saying men’s reproductive rights aren’t worth a few $ (€, £, ¥) and aren’t worth the slightest injury to a woman’s ego. They are basically saying men aren’t entitled to either peace of mind or even basic reproductive or bodily rights.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:10 PM
19

Oh for goodness sake, let me quote you from the bible, namely Mathew 12:45-48 And when they asked him “by what sign shall we know them to be true”, Jesus spoke unto them “know that men who follow on my path seek no earthly reward. For verily I say onto thee, seek not silver, nor praise, nor followers, nor likes, nor subscribers, nor upvotes of any kind….
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:00 AM
43

Managing the feelings is a great way to begin managing the problems. It’s also a great way to beat around the bush and never do anything meaningful to actually change. Talking and doing are two entirely different things. Talking helps you feel better about your problems, doing (taking action) actually solves your problems. That’s why treatment programs use regimentation to help people overcome drugs, become physically fit and overcome other problems. Men don’t tend to use “therapy” because it’s …
/r/MensRights20/10/24 07:43 PM
4

of the gay variety You lucky bastard
/r/MensRights16/10/24 09:18 PM
137

She just pulled this out of her ass and doesn’t know what she’s talking about. Seriously, just one look at Elton John or the Rolling Stones and it’s clear that male artists don’t stop until their dead. Here’s the thing, apart from a tiny subset of “art snobs” who follow “modern artists” of questionable talent, nobody has ever heard of this flea bag. Has she ever heard of absolute giants of modern art like Andy Warhal, Salvador Dalí or Pablo Picasso? Apparently not. In fact, in a recent article i…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 05:49 AM
23

I think people have tried this and it turns out that AI only produces pictures of men who are rapists and abusers according to AWDTSG.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:47 AM
57

More than that. They actually ban women who call out false or exaggerated accusations against men. The mods are actively supporting slander.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:44 AM
1

Yeah, let’s do away with freedom of assembly and get rid of elections as well. Those things only result in “traitors” (people you don’t like) causing trouble.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:06 PM
3

So, basically, it was as close to a violent insurrection as a rock concert is.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 12:02 PM
3

There’s no law requiring you to talk to women. If you find talking to women to be stressful or mentally draining, then avoid them. I have six women in my life - wife, two daughters, secretary, two sisters-in-law, and that’s more than enough for me.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:55 AM
6

deadly attack Didn’t the officer die of a heart attack?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:37 AM
2

It’s a political indictment designed to silence and do away with the political opposition by a group of politically motivated prosecutors some of whom actually campaigned on the promise of jailing Donald Trump “for something”. The USA, like many crumbling democracies in the west, is seriously teetering on the brink of political tyranny. Two assassination attempts against him in as many months! It’s questionable if Trump will live long enough to see election night. These are dark days. The small …
/r/MensRights10/10/24 08:27 AM
5

I won’t argue - there is considerable disagreement on exactly what the facts might have been, but it’s clear Trump didn’t do anything substantial to “overthrow” the election because the transition occurred in the manner prescribed by law. I’ll pay careful attention to the next one. I’m curious if it will be close.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:37 AM
8

Excuse me, coupe’s are done using armed men, the military, tanks and planes. They aren’t done by asking “hey delay the count until the courts get a chance to fully review everything”. I’m not a US resident and don’t follow the excruciating details of US politics, but didn’t Hillary Clinton refuse to admit defeat? Doesn’t Nancy Pelosi still to this day declare that the 2016 elections were fraudulent and “hi-jacked”? Every country has it’s peculiarities, but using the courts to persecute political…
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:17 AM
6

Attempted to halt the transfer of power? With what exactly? A bunch of unarmed yahoos wearing fur hats with horns on them who were escorted into the government building by the police? If this was a coupe attempt it was the meekest and most half hearted coupe attempt in human history! It’s ridiculous there are people who actually believe this obvious nonsense.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:30 AM
6

I think that’s becoming clear. For all our sakes, I truly hope our friends in the USA can recover their democracy.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 08:46 PM
34

Democracy is slowly slipping away from the west - maybe not so slowly. Canada, the UK and Australia have been sliding this way since 2015 where the media and governments have effectively advocated for lessening rights and stifling politically incorrect opinions in the name of combating “misinformation”. In the UK, freedom of speech has been taken away to the point where people expressing opposition to feminist dogma are being prosecuted. In Canada, the right to association was effectively stampe…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:52 PM
2

Construction projects which were not a priority for the country, various other low priority infrastructure projects- basically anything to get their pictures in the media showing them handing over large novelty cheques for millions with the Conservative party logo on them. The people controlling the party now are a bunch of lunatic left/feminists who want to “smash the western patriarchy” and are incredibly corrupt. These people have handed out tens/hundreds of millions of tax dollars to various…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:30 PM
5

Well, Harper’s Conservative party maintained the Liberals small government policies for their first years, but they eventually started becoming corrupt and started handing out large sums for various unnecessary “make work” projects. I vividly recall Conservatives handing out huge novelty cheques for millions to various groups with the Conservative Parties Logo on them - something that pissed me off and a majority of Canadians because it was money belonging to the taxpayers not the Conservatives.…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 05:55 PM
1

Yes, there were plenty of non-feminist members of the Liberal Party of Canada (LPC). Several prime ministers, finance ministers, industry ministers- a whole lot of them. The LPC had tremendous depth with several major figures from business, law and science being party members. There were rivalries within the party of course, but from the end of the 80’s to the mid 2010’s, the party was dominated by “small L liberals” who believed in substantially free markets and smaller governments with strong …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 03:52 PM
9

My tax dollars at work. Canada has been a defacto Feminist State since 2015 when Justine “I’m a feminist” Trudeau won an election. He purged all the non-feminists from the Liberal party turning the party into a talentless rump of its former self. His government has steered Canada straight into the dumpster since taking power. There’s open talk about doing away with incarceration for women, refugees are let into the country if they are the “preferred gender” (women), anyone who’s critical of his …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 02:30 PM
4

So true - I used to believe what I saw on YouTube until I became a YouTuber and realized most of it was fake. Note: lots of content isn’t necessarily fake (information content for example), but virtually all of the “real situations” or “drama” content is fake.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 06:24 PM
8

Manufactured (fake) content on the web is overwhelming. The great majority of content on YouTube, Facebook and TikTok is fake. Example: I once saw a video of an Uber driver who’s fare canceled her ride after the driver was underway. Drama ensued and the video racked up millions of views, followers, and comments. A couple of months later I came across the same type of video - I checked out the rest of his videos and it was same thing over and over again with different women passengers. Many of th…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:14 PM
21

It’s a result of the “gamification” of social media. Social media sites (like virtually all of them) award people “points” for posting popular content. The more popular the content, the more points awarded. The points can be literal points (like Reddit’s karma points), or it could be likes, followers, subscribers, views, comments etc. people very quickly tailor their content to earn the most points. Unfortunately, it’s vastly easier to gain points by bashing people than by doing something truly …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:52 PM
63

I’m not using the pill, but I’m not aborting at this stage.. DANGER WILL ROBINSON! DANGER! flails arms vigorously
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/24 03:57 AM
2

That’s different because patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights16/09/24 10:08 AM
3

Men made the world and continue to do so. Some people are butt hurt by the FACT that they live in the shadow of the greatness of men.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 09:15 AM
8

Look at the device you’re using this moment - it was invented, engineered, and built by men. Look around the room you’re in - virtually everything in it was invented, engineered, and built by men. Men created, built and run each of the companies that built and supplied everything you’re looking at. You live in a building built by men, in a city founded by men in a nation created by men. Men literally built everything in our world. If it doesn’t involve taking care of babies, it’s done by men. Me…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 09:12 AM
36

Wasn’t the UK trying to dispense with murder charges when women kill men, specifically men they are in a relationship with? As I understand, it was an attempt made by feminists to essentially decriminalize murder by women on the theory that it’s always self defence.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:13 PM
1

Hold up, as I understand it, the Boy Scouts of America did this because their membership was declining and they hoped this would add members. They weren’t pressured into it. As for Girl Scouts, they apparently don’t mind having low membership - perhaps they’re just a smaller organization. However, having an all boys fraternal group is a good thing and perhaps one will be formed.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 03:48 PM
59

If you’re a childless man hoping to start a family some day, a single mom should be off your list of possible prospects. I dated two such women in my youth and it was awkward to say the least - sort of like “dating with one arm tied behind my back while walking towards a place you really don’t want to go to.” The child makes it very difficult to actually date the woman and all the while you know it’s never going to work in the end. Single moms are often eager to show affection to a single childl…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 12:26 AM
24

Actually, “decimate” is an ancient Latin word meaning to kill every tenth person; therefore, it’s not possible to decimate “everyone” in the restaurant, just 1/10th of the people in the restaurant. Source: I’m a student of ancient Roman culture and history (SPQR forever!). As for this woman, I can do no better than to quote the impeccable wisdom of Emperor Marcus Aurelius himself: plubis et canum don batshitacus Translation: Bitches be crazy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/09/24 12:11 AM
4

I don’t think men will “fuck anything”, but it’s obvious that men will fuck beneath them.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:45 PM
19

Femcel has a very different quality to it. It doesn’t imply a woman who can’t get sex because she’s too ugly, It implies a man hater who can’t get love because she’s too entitled.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:42 PM
13

I read all of that and I have three comments: She almost certainly isn’t as financially successful as she thinks she is. She’s got nothing to offer the type of guy she’s looking for. She’s got an average income, a ton of baggage and absolutely zero empathy or compassion. I read nothing in her numerous postings/comments that made me think this woman cares about anyone other than herself. She’s ugly, that’s why she can’t find a guy. It’s not rocket science. Most attractive women don’t have trouble…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/24 08:23 PM
113

If a cis man doesn’t like Taylor Swift, then there’s something wrong with the cis man. If a trans man doesn’t like Taylor Swift, then there’s something wrong with Taylor Swift. P.S. Taylor Swift sucks.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 10:10 AM
17

40s??????? I guess 49 and 11/12ths is technically in her 40’s? Maybe she means only 40 proof from now on?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/24 04:32 AM
10

Women could do the same, but they don’t. Even today women could go out there, start risky game changing businesses, take the hard road and get dirty, but they won’t.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 05:44 PM
13

It’s worse than that. Let’s say 98% of major successful inventions and business were created by men and 2% were created by women (those are rough numbers but probably generous towards the contribution of women). Female supremacists will say women helped build society and it’s misogyny to dismiss the women (2%) who contributed. They even celebrate those women. They freely admit that 2% of rape allegations are false (the real number is significantly larger) yet they claim that this 2% is so small …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 04:50 PM
16

A majority of virtually everything is done by men. Building, inventing, creating, manufacturing, mining, enforcing, designing, testing, repairing, restoring, rescuing, writing, and physical labour, is all overwhelmingly done by men. Virtually everything that involves taking risks such as investing, starting a business or developing a new product is done predominantly by men. Virtually every successful company, idea or product was created by men. Rome (Roman empire) was created by two men (Romulu…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 03:41 PM
44

This. There is no such thing as a woman who’s too ugly to date, but there is a great excess of women who are too self entitled to settle.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/24 03:56 PM
23

In her mind her standards aren’t high at all, just like in the mind of a gross penniless beggar, wanting a woman to selflessly wait on him hand and foot is quite reasonable.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/24 03:51 PM
17

Both my daughters are very healthy and have never had any health issues. They both do very well in school, are well adjusted, popular, very attractive and happy. My older girl is in university and doing well there, and my youngest is finishing high School and also doing well. I’ve heard that bullshit femcel nonsense about older men fathering children with health issues and from my research that’s total poppycock. I researched the topic quite well when I wanted to start a family. Health problems …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/24 06:56 PM
34

The critical thing is that the FIRST pregnancy has to be no later than early 30s. My wife gave birth to our first kid at 35 and our second at 38. Getting her pregnant only required keeping track of her cycles and it happened quickly. Her sister tried to get pregnant at the same time (at age 39). It was more difficult to get pregnant for her. She had to go to a fertility clinic but miscarried. That’s how quickly fertility ends for women - just a couple of years in your 30’s makes all the differen…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/24 02:35 PM
11

R/maledatingadvice?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/08/24 06:16 PM
1

There’s nothing to fix - there’s no scientific evidence that toxic masculinity exists and you’ve just postulated that the term is contrived for political purposes. Perhaps be clearer as to what you’re trying to say in the future.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 08:10 PM
3

The onus is on people who believe that “toxic masculinity” exists to PROVE that it does by scientific means. Any group of people can just claim something exists, like Big Foot, the Jewish conspiracy or “toxic masculinity”. Prove it scientifically or just keep your opinions to yourself.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 07:42 PM
2

You’re “references” are nothing more than people discussing their opinions and personal “observations”.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 03:15 PM
9

Her argument is spurious. She’s say humanity was egalitarian for 200,000 years until MEN developed agriculture and civilization and there by created patriarchy. She’s effectively saying men DID get their shit together because MEN built a world which was a lot nicer, kinder, more prosperous, safer and better to live in than the previous savage, Stone Age, starvation riddled, dog-eat-dog world of egalitarianism. According to her, we men DID get our shit together, and that shit didn’t include women…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:03 AM
4

OP is framing the question poorly. Cleary a great many women do respect and show reverence for the great men who have built our world, but increasingly many women, particularly feminists, don’t. I think his confusion arises from the popularity of man hating and misandry, particularly in online spaces where any woman who voices opposition to the misandry is viciously attacked by other women. It is concerning that feminists and other anti-male bigots have effectively made public discourse a safe s…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 11:11 AM
3

Modern feminist everyone.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:52 PM
7

Thing to remember here - 99% of these Reddit stories are fake. This story sounds fake.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:48 PM
48

Hey man, it was HER body, and it was HER choice, not his. She doesn’t need to tell him. Just like if he decides to fuck dozens of other women behind her back he doesn’t have to tell her because it was HIS body and it was HIS choice to fuck those other women. /s 🤡
/r/MensRights16/08/24 10:26 AM
24

75% of people felt it was unacceptable According to who? It never ceases to amaze me that people believe this obvious horse shit. Some media affiliated group says 75% of people believe X, and we just accept that? Ha! I’m certain 85% of people don’t give a crap about men being topless and another 99% of people have far bigger issues they’re concerned with.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 02:49 AM
3

Why are you even talking to this woman? 99% of the troubles between men and women can be soled by men just walking away and not engaging in further conversation. It’s pointless discussing misandry with women who don’t view men as people.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:18 PM
50

She’s basically saying men will stoop to fucking anything when they’re sexually desperate. She doesn’t realize that she’s the “anything” men would stoop to when they’re sexually desperate. Women flaunt their sexuality when they have nothing to offer other than sex, then get angry when men view them sexually. We have all seen this - social media is saturated with it - ugly, tacky and/or overweight women (often morbidly overweight) basically shaking their partially nude bodies for attention. They …
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:25 AM
72

It is actually fashionable for women to voice disdain, contempt and even hatred against men. Increasingly, it’s actually required. Many feminist spaces (twox, trollx, etc) basically encourage women to spew hatred against men and they will upvote women who do. They will viciously downvote anyone who defends men, especially if it’s a man doing it. Even the names of the mods incorporate anti-male bigotry. This is a sign that there is an organized attempt to spread hatred against men for vile and ne…
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:39 PM
52

It’s obviously an embellished story. Either there was actual sex with the “client” in the hotel or the whole story is fabricated. It’s also amazes me how she accuses her boyfriend of objectifying her (fetishizes her she claims) while she’s the one doing everything she can to objectify herself. If she dislikes being fetishized (objectified) by men, then why is she literally selling her ass every night in front of a crowd? Why? Because she LOVES being objectified!
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:08 PM
1

It’s shocking how many homely, morbidly overweight, out of shape, tacky looking and just plain ugly women there are on TikTok with large followings. They literally just post a short video of them shaking their cleavage or ass at the camera. A common insult women use is to claim that “men will fuck anything” - they don’t realize that they’re the “anything” men will fuck (if they’re desperate enough).
/r/MensRights09/08/24 12:25 AM
2

because the nature of the study is based on subjective opinions It’s based on the CHOICES made by women - objective evidence. The women making those choices may be motivated by subjective opinions, but the choices women make is the subject of the inquiry. Furthermore, “Red pill people”, “MGTOWS” (like most people) are able to observe the obvious. It’s unfortunate that you can’t.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 06:27 PM
2

It uses real objective data of real choices by real women making real dating choices in real dating sites. It’s not based on “surveys” which are typically used in “gender studies” where women are given hypothetical answers in survey questions to hypothetical facts. Survey questions, answers and hypothetical fact scenarios can easily be manipulated to get bogus results. Objective evidence tells you what happens in real life.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:52 PM
3

It wasn’t a “study”, it was objective hard evidence. It wasn’t two, it was repeated multiple times with the same objective results. Bottom line: Women objectify men in an online dating environment and become exceedingly picky - they develop a “rejection mentality” which makes it very difficult to match with anyone.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:38 PM
24

It’s the 3 rules of online dating: Be attractive. Don’t be unattractive. Delete the app and meet in person.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 05:32 PM
59

The guy was an icky creep. He didn’t even ask consent before saving her life! Just imagine if this creep did something truly horrific like cure cancer or solve world hunger? I can’t even.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:34 AM
37

I think a small percentage of “lesbians” aren’t actually lesbians at all, they’re heterosexual women who have a deep seated hatred of men (and probably a few other significant issues as well). There is a term, “Political Lesbians” for heterosexual women who despise, hate and fear men so much that they strictly associate only with women. Expressing their hatred of men to other women - literally bragging to other women about how much they hate men - appears to be associated with these women.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 08:50 AM
1

Indeed. I can’t imagine how ugly a woman has to be to end up involuntarily celibate. You see profiles and pictures in the internet of strikingly unattractive women who proudly proclaim they have active sex lives with multiple men, but that doesn’t seem real until you see it first hand. Many years ago I once went on a blind date (early days of online dating) with a woman. We exchanged pictures, but her pictures just wouldn’t open, so I took a risk and met her anyway. I can honestly say she was by…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 06:03 AM
3

Other phrases for situationship include: “big mistake”, “waste of time”, “ticking time bomb”, “stalker priming” and my personal favourite “false rape accusation in the making”. Seriously, a man having a sexual relationship with a woman he’s not willing to commit to is just an enormous waste of his time and is exposing him to all manner of grief when things go sideways (and they often go sideways). I understand the enormous temptation and psychological pressure to have sex with a woman you don’t …
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:28 AM
59

I think the “bottom” (in terms of physical attractiveness) 20% of women benefit the most from online dating. For comparison, from the experimental data I’ve seen, the top 20% of men match at approximately the same frequency as the bottom 20% of women - let that sink in. This causes the following: The top 20% of women are so inundated by attention that apps are frustrating for them to use. They get so much attention without apps that they just quit. They don’t need online dating to find a great g…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 02:10 PM
19

I think I speak for all men on the subject of teenage boys being seduced by aging desperate cougars with weather beaten faces when I say 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:09 AM
90

especially women, are just usually brought up is the mentality to serve others On what planet? Because here on earth women don’t do shit to help out men.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:03 AM
10

Google is a thing, but, here’s a taste: Name one dozen great scientists/engineers who massively influenced humanity: Newton, Kepler, DeBroglie, Einstein, Watt, Tesla, DaVinci, Michelson, Goodenough, Edison, Darwin, Pauling, Plank, the Wright brothers, Archimedes, Turing, Ford, Gutenberg, Heisenberg, etc, etc, etc - all are men. Name ONE scientist who was a woman and was sufficiently influential (not necessarily great) to be memorable - there is one: Marie Curie. That’s off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 02:13 AM
11

Yes.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:43 AM
22

The most proper response is this: 95%+ of every great invention was created by men. 95%+ of every building was built by men. 100% of every huge company was started and built by men. 100% of every religion was started by men. 95%+ of all the minerals and ores mined are men. 95%+ of every significant scientific discovery was discovered by men. In fact, 95%+ of everything significant that is wonderful and good was built, invented and put into practice by men. Men account for 95%+ of everything that…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:21 AM
2

Women are 6% angrier then men Why do I get this impression that the Guardian uses 67% more nonsensical rubbish in their articles than corresponding publications? Is it because they print obviously ridiculous nonsense? How on god’s green earth could anyone show that women are X% angrier than men? How could you even objectively measure how angry someone is? There isn’t even a unit of “angriness” to measure with! They asked people? Oh, that’s objective - he said sarcastically. Kind of like asking a…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 03:45 PM
19

I didn’t get women’s attention until later in life as well, but I resisted the temptation of staying with women I knew to be unsuitable despite the sex. I eventually met a much younger woman (29 years old) when I was in my early 40s and we got married and raised two kids and built a great life together. It’s true many women don’t take things seriously until they’re about to hit 30 (or 40), but you shouldn’t date any of them unless they’re the perfect match for you. You have time - lots of it. Th…
/r/MensRights26/06/24 08:25 PM
4

True.
/r/MensRights26/06/24 07:56 PM
73

but in modern dating culture the women hold all the cards. That's just the reality. The thing is, they actually don’t hold all the cards. In truth, men hold the trump card, namely the ability to have children later in life. Men have the power to be swinging singles until their mid/late forties before settling down and starting a family. Women don’t have that. Don’t underestimate that power - it’s something that a large proportion of women are deeply jealous about. Women’s apparent power in datin…
/r/MensRights26/06/24 07:20 PM
19

Let me chime in on the “1-2% of allegations are false” and why it is a myth. Firstly, it’s described in the actual literature as between 2% to 10% as PROVEN false, not 1-2%. Some studies show it as 2%, others show it as over 20-30%, the balance is between 2% to 10% are proven false. Secondly, only about 1-2% of rape allegations are ever PROVEN TRUE. Indeed, many feminists go to great length to point out that the conviction rate for rape is very low - on the order of 1%. Hence, the likelihood tha…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:18 AM
10

I’ve seen moderators in menslib actually claim that the forced conscription of men is not oppression against men but is actually a form of male privilege and is also an example of women being oppressed. Apparently, the feminists of menslib only think conscription is oppressive if it’s transwomen being conscripted.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 11:30 PM
31

They will also ban anyone who points out the blatant ridiculousness and obvious flaws in “feminist research”.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 11:20 PM
34

Standpoint “theory” is literally something feminists invented to create false credibility to unfalsifiable clap trap. The premise behind standpoint “theory” is ludicrous on its face. It’s a ridiculous notion that “oppressed” people who, by virtue of their oppression (less education, less resources, less training, fewer enriching experiences, and much less access to information) are somehow MORE knowledgeable about oppression despite their lack of access to information. Furthermore, oppressed peo…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 11:16 PM
23

Maybe bears should operate on her. She’ll probably feel more comfortable with bears in the operating theatre.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 05:38 PM
9

List of phrases totally acceptable to feminists: MALE gaze MALE entitlement MALE privilege MALE violence MALE tears MALE feminist(s) FEMALE genital mutilation ……. List of unacceptable (forbidden) terms for feminists MALE genital mutilation (doesn’t exist and/or it’s not serious) MALE disposability (doesn’t exist) Paternity fraud (doesn’t exist) Any use of the word “female” apart from female genital mutilation because it’s sexist.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:37 PM
8

When it comes to rejection, there is “every case”, “virtually every case”, “great majority of cases” and the feminist projection of “the lived experience of women”. “Every case”, “virtually every case” and “great majority of cases” vary by a few isolated cases and are not a cause for serious concern. “The lived experience of women” are usually grossly exaggerated distortions of reality which feed off of the paranoia of feminists in an echo-chamber. In 45+ years of approaching women, watching men…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:53 PM
10

I’m well aware of how the term was created, but being a bitter man hater because the attractive men you have sex with won’t commit to you is NOT being an incel. That’s why the term femcel is used.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:13 AM
117

Incels don’t get sex or affection from any woman so they’re depressed and down. Femcels get lots of sex and attention, but they can’t get commitment from the men they actually want so they’re angry and bitter at all men. Edited for clarity.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 05:52 PM
274

Her article is just man hating, nothing more. There is a large audience of femcels who are constantly looking for man hate to gawk at. Subs like r/ twox…, r/ trollx…, r/ askfeminists etc. and the various facebook anti-male groups (are we dating the same guy, etc) aren’t enough to meet demand for man hating, so media companies crank out horse shit like this article to help bring in the clicks.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 03:27 PM
36

That’s all irrelevant and has nothing to do with the whole men v bear meme. Obviously bears are more dangerous - that’s not their point. Their point is that they loath and hate men so much that they’re comfortable comparing men to vicious wild animals and will presume every man is a subhuman beast to be feared and avoided. They’re happy to wear their objectifying bigotry on their sleeves. The way to deal with this meme is to restate it in reverse. If you were a hungry bear, who would you rather …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:59 AM
-11

This is a mental health issue, not a gender issue. Yes her husband and child have a lot to deal with, but schizophrenia isn’t anybody’s fault. No one chooses to become schizophrenic - it’s usually the result of a biological/genetic disorder. Edit: there is certainly a difference in how schizophrenic men are treated as opposed to schizophrenic women, but this post doesn’t make that point. Getting schizophrenia isn’t a gender issue, but the different ways men with schizophrenia get treated as oppo…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 09:00 AM
3

Very true. I’ve heard that on average approximately 50% of people are emotionally/mentally well adjusted but approximately 50% are emotionally/mentally maladjusted to some extent ranging from neurotic to psychotic to psychopathic. Avoiding the “wrong half” can be a challenge, but they usually provide you with indicators (crazy hair, extravagant behaviour, being a bad boy/girl).
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:18 PM
1

That’s not always true - it depends on the woman and how she was raised. A well adjusted woman who was brought up in a loving family environment is far more reasonable, respectful and rational. A woman raised in a dysfunctional environment with lots of family abuse will often display terrible judgment and behave in an emotional or physically abusive manner. Well adjusted women usually aren’t attracted enough to a “bad boy” to commit to one and instead look for decent and reliable men whom they c…
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:09 PM
36

As a straight man I feel insulted on behalf of gay men by the 2SLGBTQI+RAGGMOPPetc acronym. Gay men did virtually ALL the heavy lifting in fighting for equality and recognition of that community. Overwhelmingly it was gay men who came out of the closet, risked their careers, safety and reputations to change minds and change policies. Gay men literally died (continue to die in some places) for equality and human rights. Only AFTER gay men successfully carved out a safe space for that community at…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:17 AM
10

Misandry is much more harmful to men than misogyny is to women. The notion that men are less valuable, less worthy and worse people than women (aka misandry) is the reason why hundreds of millions of men die in wars, die in mining accidents, die on the job, live on the streets, rot away in prisons and live much shorter lives. Women aren’t being murdered, killed, mutilated, deprived or brutally oppressed in anywhere near the numbers which men are. Women live significantly longer than men as a res…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:47 AM
10

Thank you! Jesus, guys in this thread are just falling for this obvious genocidal crap! Men are not a minority in these demonstrations. In fact a shit ton of men - including many Jewish men at that - are starting, organizing, leading and participating in these demonstrations. This is NOT gendered! The genocide supporters are trying to paint people who oppose genocide, ethnic cleansing, and brutal oppression as “feminists” and are trying to recruit the men’s rights movement to their diabolical ra…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:32 AM
2

Probably because of changing attitudes. Being rugged and independent and manly isn’t seen as a priority anymore for boys/ men. That’s where many of our problems stem.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:55 PM
17

The justice system often refuses to punish women for crimes like rape and murder, so how likely is it that society will make paternity fraud a crime. We do know this - a father not paying child support for a child that isn’t his because he’s a victim of paternity fraud is much more likely to get him thrown in jail then the woman who committed the paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:43 AM
-3

I think the “Boy Scouts” are doing this for financial reasons, not necessarily for “political correctness” reasons. As I understand it, there are fewer parents taking their boys into scouting, and as a result they are suffering a decrease. I think that admitting girls was about boosting their numbers. As for girl guides, I can’t comment, but what would they do if faced with a trans girl who wanted to join?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:18 AM
5

No disrespect, but Russians are very different than people in “the west”. They are much more traditional in their acceptance of gender roles - men are men and women are women sort of thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:09 AM
38

Imagine the privilege of getting through life just by asking and saying please. Young women truly are the most privileged people in all of human history.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:44 PM
21

Dating apps have not been terrible for women - it’s just that terrible women complain that the men they attract on dating apps aren’t good enough.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 10:59 AM
1

Let’s look at the “issue” from the bear’s perspective. If you were a bear, who would you rather meet in the woods? A man (tough, strong hunter who’s probably armed), or a woman (weak, cowardly feminist who’s soft and juicy on the outside yet crunchy on the inside)?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:54 PM
31

Agreed. Dating apps are intrinsically dehumanizing towards men. No self respecting man should ever use one.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:03 PM
90

I’ve heard of guys getting just a period. Literally her message was “.” The bar for acknowledging the humanity of men is so low that it’s usually met with just “hi”, but some women can’t even manage that. Seriously, why even bother trying to meet women if they are this pathetic and narcissistic. God I’m happy I got married 25 years ago before things got this bad.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 05:00 PM
74

No, this is even more dehumanizing towards men. Instead of expecting women to put a scintilla of effort into getting to know a man, she now has the option of making the man jump through a hoop before she’ll expend any effort to acknowledge him as a person. I suppose it’s slightly better then having her provide a graphic image of a foot the man has to kiss before he’s allowed to contact her.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:53 PM
68

Giving women a power/right/ability that you deny men is necessarily sexist, full stop. The idea was to demonstrably give women the power over who could contact them by allowing only women to message first. Initially men didn’t have a time window within which to reply, but women got upset that they were being ignored so a time limit was placed on when men could reply (being ignored is a serious problem only when it happens to women apparently). Now, Bumble is just Tinder. The logic was stupid - s…
/r/MensRights30/04/24 04:40 PM
3

Three women! Jesus, are you insane. Just the exponentially gigantic amount of psyco-emotional bullshit you’re going to be exposed to should have your limbic system flailing its arms and screaming “Danger Will Robinson, danger”! /s
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:11 AM
17

Threesomes (one guy with two women) is bullshit. Here’s why: You only have one penis. Ergo, when it comes to your sexual pleasure, one woman, two women or six women together makes no difference to you - you’re only physically capable of one at a time. You have literally twice as much physical work to do. Don’t expect the women to get each other off - that’s wishful thinking - they will both be looking to YOU to get the job done. Emotional/psychological labour - this is exponentially related to t…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:23 PM
105

That won’t happen unless women are legally compelled to die along side men in those wars. There’s no empathy towards men in society.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 05:40 PM
8

You’re right of course. Men might theoretically have equal reproductive rights with women in non-abortion jurisdictions, but they don’t have defacto reproductive equality. Women are provided with multiple reproductive rights and options (even in Kentucky) that men are denied.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:59 PM
10

I have no problem with both parents having equal responsibilities so long as that comes from a place of equal knowledge and equal choices. That of course isn’t the case. If abortion is not legal in Kentucky, then their would theoretically be equality between the parties in terms of responsibilities. Have sex > get pregnant > you're both on the hook. This encourages people who actually don't want a child to take serious steps to prevent pregnancy. There would (might?) still be an imbalance as to …
/r/MensRights26/04/24 09:01 PM
9

It can be very difficult to discern mentally disturbed women from well adjusted women. Furthermore, people change, and a woman can change from reasonable (while you're her friend) to viciously spiteful when you break off the relationship. Finally, many women have exceedingly fragile egos and are looking for validation from other like minded women who may be eager to encourage her to report you to the school for something she feels you did.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:40 PM
14

With a default guilty until proven innocent (without you having an opportunity to prove your innocence), you have no choice but to avoid any association with any woman on campus. If you date women, make sure they are not attending the same institution you attend. This means, as regards to the women in your educational institution: Don't date them. Don't be intimate with them. Don't physically touch them. Don't socialize with them in any way. Never be alone with them. Don't sit beside them in cla…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:28 PM
11

Korea seems particularly bad - worse than most nations in terms of feminist hate mongers.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:50 AM
14

It’s amazing how fiercely “feminists” will defend fat women refusing to date fat men while simultaneously criticizing men in general for refusing to date fat, old, or otherwise unattractive women.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:25 AM
6

I’m sorry that happened to you. That’s terrible. Stay strong brother.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:20 AM
22

She wants to crap on men and simultaneously stroke her own ego. Her comment has a real femcel vibe to it: “I’m a hot attractive woman and dated a ton of guys but most men are trash.” Said in a men’s forum where men are struggling to understand the hypocrisy of some women.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:12 AM
10

In defence of all those women who don’t watch the WNBA, women don’t follow women’s sports mostly because (a) it sucks, and (b) there’s no drama in it. Women love drama. That’s why women love those reality shows like “real housewives of Dallas/New York/Chelsea/Durban/Timbucktu”. They want outrageously dramatic reality, not actual real reality. Personally I don’t understand it, but that’s just what a lot of women want, so why question it or expect them to want something different. Some women want …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:20 PM
2

I understand where you’re coming from, and I agree that emotional intimacy is a need that should be met. I’m pointing out that if you’re being manipulated and controlled by someone using emotional intimacy and sex as a weapon, then you need to walk away. Hopefully you can find that intimacy in a woman who won’t try to control you with it. Don’t fear walking away from abuse and manipulation.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:10 PM
76

I knew a guy who works for a major sports network. They do locker room interviews. Back when the interviews were shot on tape, women back at the network would share the tapes with each other to “check out” the naked shots of various sports stars and athletes. Creepy as hell. I presume they’re doing the same thing again using digital files. Locker room interviews must be banned. It’s just wrong.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:35 AM
8

I understand your point of view, and I agree that it’s grossly unfair that sex is so easy for women yet so hard for men, but men need to realize that dignity and self respect are more important than sexual gratification. We need to find the strength to walk away from sex and the women who would use sex to control us. Women have sexual power over men because of our inability to just walk away from sex. If we men all had the power to walk away from sexual manipulation even if it meant giving up on…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:10 AM
16

It’s an interesting contrast between the different approaches normal men and feminist women take on life. Feminist women are obsessed with changing men with the goal of improving the lives of women, while normal men have no desire to change women and are instead interested in changing themselves with the goal of improving THEIR OWN lives. The first “approach” toxically places all blame on men for the crappy lives of women. That approach is doomed to fail. The second approach places “blame” for o…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:17 PM
19

Unfortunately, the reverse is not true. Feminists aren’t trained by their boyfriends to become more resilient, productive and useful people.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:14 AM
3

It’s obviously true. They are often a conflicted ball of jealousy, delusion, anger and desperate unfulfilled needs. I particularly enjoy the feminists who proclaim how much they hate male attention. “When will men just leave us the hell alone!”, “I hate how gaining weight hasn’t stopped all the men from bothering me!”, “I can’t even leave the house without a man bothering me!”. Lol. None of these feminists are getting even 1% of the “attention” they're complaining about.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:58 AM
1

Women in their 30’s aren’t extinct, and not everyone (including men) wants a family. Many men do want a family and that’s the reason they want to get married. The unfortunate reality is that fertility for women drops off significantly at age 35, and it takes a good 3-4 years at least to date a woman, get engaged, get married, get established and then start trying to raise a family. Just do the math - 33/34 year old woman plus another 3-4 years equals 36-38 years old before trying to start a fami…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:28 PM
1

There’s a big difference though. Every woman will experience being in her 20’s. It does not require any effort or talent to be 24 years old. Nearly 100% of women will eventually be in their 20’s so there are a lot of them. Being rich, on the other hand, requires a combination of luck, hard work and self discipline and that combination is rare. Very few men (1%?) will experience being wealthy. Women chasing rich men is therefore quite unrealistic because there are very few women who can successfu…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 03:39 PM
2

Well I’ll have to defer to you on this. After dating close to 100 different women in my 20’s and 30’s, I met a woman aged 29 when I was 40, married her 2 and 1/2 years later and raised a happy family. That was over 23 years ago - before smartphones and dating apps. Things are pretty different nowadays, and from what I hear, good women are either much harder to find or much less common.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:29 AM
7

The only people shaming men for dating younger women are jealous older women who can’t get a decent man.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:56 AM
10

There are women of all ages worth marrying; however, a man needs to be resolute in maintaining his standards. Upmost is never compromising on the requirement that she be respectful of you and prioritizes your relationship with her. She has to be “a breath of fresh air” in your world. She has to put at least as much effort into you as you put into her. As for kids - most women remain reasonably fertile till age 35/37, so marrying a woman in her early 30’s is fine if you want to raise a family. Da…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 06:53 AM
35

If they’re in danger they yell help and then a man comes to help.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:11 AM
5

I would argue that the BLM movement was created by black feminist women specifically to take more power from white feminists. Intersectionality has been colonized by white feminists.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:22 PM
12

Helping boys runs counter to the mainstream ethos of government, so the default position is to not help boys of any type. However, there is political pressure placed on governments to help black people, First Nations people, and disadvantaged groups in general, including women. Girls benefit the most from this, particularly white girls, but a little help trickles down to black and other ethnic minority boys. Make no mistake, the emphasis is on helping girls, with special emphasis on white girls.…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:17 PM
16

What a load of horse-shit! It’s a bunch of vacuous jingles strung together to form the verbal equivalent of a black velvet painting of dogs playing cards. Being a man is being brave enough to accept your own cowardice while also being strong enough to accept the bravery of others. It’s about taking the high road despite the hard times while always twirling and twirling towards self awareness.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:41 AM
18

Here is the fundamental answer to this and most other similar questions. Question: Why do men do the majority of crime? Answer: Men do the vast majority of virtually everything in our world, so why should crime be any different. PROOF: An overwhelming majority of highly successful businesses were/are started by men, including every fortune 500 company. An overwhelming majority of inventions and technology was/is created by men. An overwhelming majority of the infrastructure that’s built was/is b…
/r/MensRights03/04/24 11:12 PM
52

80 L in alimony? Is that 80 UK pounds? (Like $100-$130). Is it a typo and she meant $80,000? Regardless, she’s a terrible person and got what she deserved - a heard of cats.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/24 05:06 PM
28

She’s full of crap. When women make more money they look for men who make even MORE money. The hypergamy gets worse as they make more money. She’s also saying society “needs to learn” that as women make more money they become desirous of more attractive, fit and youthful, men. This is also bull. Society has ALWAYS known that women strongly prefer handsome, fit and youthful men. The ancient Greeks and Romans literally chiseled that preference into marble and mounted those statues all over their s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/24 03:03 PM
37

As I understand it, he didn’t even meet many of the women who were saying terrible things about him. Also, he went on one short date with a couple of the women and decided he wasn’t interested in them and stopped communicating- as is everyone’s right - but those women basically couldn’t take the rejection and then stalked him and post terrible lies about him, so they’re being sued. Finally, it’s perfectly fine for men to date several women at once- his body, his choice.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 01:50 PM
20

It’s ironic women who hate men and don’t want attention from men are absolutely obsessed with voicing how much they hate men and how much they don’t want male attention. It just screams: “I don’t want male attention. You hear that men, I don’t want your attention! Hello! Aren’t you listening? I said I DON’T want your attention. STOP IGNORING ME AND PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT I’M SAYING!”
/r/MensRights23/03/24 07:59 PM
64

Her posts are part of an alarming trend among self identified feminists, particularly in self proclaimed feminist spaces/subreddits (twox, trollx, askfeminists, feminism, femaledatingstrategies, and the multiverse of AWDTSG groups, etc). The trend is to insult, belittle, generalize, presume the very worst in and generally dehumanize men. It often takes the form of proclaiming that they don’t want men, don’t need men, don’t find men attractive (except for a tiny few), don’t want attention from me…
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:54 PM
1

I wasn’t the commenter who made the generalization, but I agree with you that generalizing people is wrong. From my experience, 95% of the differences between women’s behaviour and men’s behaviour is due to differences in circumstances, not due to any inherent differences.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 04:08 PM
11

The BIG difference is that one group is talking hypothetically about women in general without doxing anyone, while the other group (AWDTSG) is actively trying to destroy a man’s life.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:40 AM
16

She’s a prostitute looking for $$$$$ from married men - this is why she says she loves “day dates” (she knows her “dates” aren’t available in the evening). She might be looking for a sugar baby type arrangement with an older married man - she’s obviously hinting at it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/24 11:41 AM
64

There are 12 year old boys being forced to die in cobalt mines in the Congo to supply lithium for iPhones which every feminist carries in their “fight against women’s oppression”, yet I’ve never heard one of these feminists ever voice one word of concern about the brutal oppression of boys. They are blind to anyone’s suffering except their own.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 11:30 AM
2

This is nonsense. The “advice” these coaches hand out is near useless. Many years ago I knew an overweight woman who was inspired by one of these “marry a rich man” coaches who convinced her that rich men also marry overweight women. She made a plan, followed the advice, and now she’s a permanently single older woman with no family. Finding a husband (or wife) to be your faithful life partner is hard and it requires a lot of self sacrifice, empathy, kindness and compromise - things these coaches…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:44 AM
20

There is something deeper at play. For decades, feminism was the respite of unlovable man haters and hopeless academics. No one took either group seriously. Since the fall of communism, something changed, and the 1% started backing feminism and started apportioning feminists to positions of power. There is something sinister going on which has nothing to do with rights and everything to do with dividing society into groups which can be played against each other.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 02:20 PM
42

It’s not her attitude that’s her problem. It’s not her strength. It’s not her success. It’s not that men are intimidated by her. It’s one thing, and one thing only - it’s the simple fact that she’s NOT good looking and successful but is instead fat, unattractive and mediocre. Women who complain about being single because men are too intimidated by good looks, confidence and success are never attractive, confident or successful. Here’s the simple facts: attractive women NEVER complain about being…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/24 06:59 AM
1

Yeah, this is a creative writing exercise. There might be some truth in the story, but if so it’s hugely exaggerated. Firstly, the “I had to be a whore to pay my tuition” thing is a trope. 99% of prostitutes aren’t doing it because they’re hard working scholarly students enrolled in a fancy university and just need some extra money to make ends meet before they win the Nobel prize for medicine. Overwhelmingly whores are attracted to the “lifestyle” because they’re fucking losers with little ambi…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/24 03:06 PM
5

She should not compromise! Never compromise because you deserve the best! The best boxed wine available! The best cats on display! You go girl.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/24 01:20 PM
12

Her solution is obvious. Purchase cats and boxed wine. Problem solved and in the process no one will be harmed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/24 01:15 PM
9

I agree it’s not the most serious crime, but having a criminal record and actually going to jail ought to cause people to self reflect. Many people try to become better people after/during their time in prison by either finding god, becoming more self disciplined and finding a greater purpose in life. Her approach seems to involve developing better instagram skills and becoming even more entitled. This woman claims to know her own worth but it’s obvious she doesn’t know her own value - zero.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/12/23 08:35 PM
18

If you’re a single cis man in NYC who is successful and ambitious you also likely have the following characteristics: (1) an all consuming drive to spend all of your mental energy and time on succeeding at your vocation, and (2) no time for bullshit (like dating women who waited too long to get serious about commitment and are still trying to find themselves).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/12/23 12:20 PM
21

I saw her list and thought, “there are 3 men in all of Australia that meet her requirements- one is gay, the other two are already married and none of them would touch her with a ten foot pole”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/23 01:30 AM
26

Men won’t bother looking her up online. One look at her face and they’ll nope right out of there. Her problem isn’t that she’s ugly (she is ugly though), it’s that she’s so entitled. Lots of ugly women live happy and fulfilled lives because they’re reasonable in their expectations. Most (well, maybe many) homely women are content to marry homely men who they can build a life with. In the end, it’s much better to be an older homely/ugly woman in a happy family than an attractive older woman who’s…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/23 01:27 AM
41

No doubt she’ll find several good men willing to commit to her and start a family. It’s also likely she won’t be interested in those men and will bypass them in pursuit of the “attractive and successful man her own age” who will raise a family with her. Good luck with that. Those men have a plethora of younger and more attractive women to choose from - women who decided at age 23-31 that they were good and ready to find a good man and start a family with.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/23 12:54 AM
18

She’s 38, she’s still technically capable of having children; BUT, it takes time to meet a man willing to settle down and marry her. It will take time to be in a relationship with that man, then it will take time being married before having a child. If she’s diligent in her search and if her expectations are reasonable as to the type of man she can get commitment from, then she might have enough time to start a family. Let’s be clear here, that’s unlikely to happen. She won’t be diligent because…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/12/23 12:44 AM
35

I think it’s simpler than you think. Some feminists are lesbians and aren’t attracted to men, so it’s easy for them to hate/undermine masculinity in men. Some feminists resent that they can’t attract attention from the masculine men they desire so they undermine the masculinity they can’t access. Other feminists are emotionally hurt from being rejected by masculine men after brief hookups or relationships, so they lash out against masculinity in anger. The remaining feminists are probably too in…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 05:25 PM
10

There’s a lot of analysis in these comments, but it’s not really necessary. The article reveals this woman’s main issue - she’s ugly. She’s an ugly woman looking for a fabulous guy. She’s not a successful “alpha woman” since she’s obviously so hard up for money that she’s making a big deal about the $350 she paid for a consultants time. She’s example #78,676,165 of an ugly self entitled woman with a bare minimum of success looking for someone well out of her league.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/12/23 12:36 PM
24

Or they just lie. Once, during the dawn of online dating, I met a woman who claimed to be 29 - she was clearly in her 40s. I called her out and walked away. That’s when the stalking started. Constant calls and messages claiming she was only in her “early 30’s” (no specific age). Then eventually “OK, I’m in my late 30s but everyone says I look much younger.” My reply? “If you’re obviously in your 40s and people say you look much younger than you must be pushing retirement age.” That stopped the c…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/23 11:37 AM
20

If men your age or older won’t date you, then date younger men, because loads of younger men want to be in committed relationships with women twice their age. This logic makes sense. If you’re a man and average looking women won’t date you, then just try to date super models and movie stars instead because lots of models and movie stars want commitment with average Joes. /s
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/12/23 11:20 AM
45

Well, to be fair, two tin cans and a long string are significantly more secure against hackers than any iPhone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/09/23 04:27 AM
10

It’s worse than that. Not only is mental illnesses often impossible to spot in others, it’s often impossible to spot in yourself. Why should men be held responsible for a woman’s state of mind when that woman doesn’t even know her own state of mind?
/r/MensRights26/09/23 01:59 PM
33

It paints the innocent man as the villain and the lying women as the “real victim”. She claims men are predatory and go around hunting for emotionally damaged and vulnerable women who happen to be hanging out in bars (men read minds apparently). As she describes it, these nefarious men use Jedi mind control techniques to get these women into bed so these men can use their penis sabres (apparently sex is never the woman’s idea). Obviously these women aren’t responsible for their own actions - the…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 01:34 PM
–

The Sexist Reason So Many People Hate Cats
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 06:59 PM
–

Have you pondered the conundrum of how being a bitter femcel who stuffs yourself with frozen deserts and gulping boxed wine contributes to the “Entrenched Sexism” of the pastryarchy? (Emphasis on the pastry)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 03:51 PM
3

Sounds like resentment. You’re resentful that a man can attract the love and affection of a younger woman while older women who didn’t get married young (20s early 30s) end up single and surrounded by cats? Well here’s something to ponder as you sip your boxed wine: unlovable women become less lovable as they age. EDIT: Touched a nerve eh? Your posting history - oh my god. You’re a real hard core femcel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:28 AM
7

Don’t you have several cats to feed?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:14 AM
15

I have a very different view and life experience so I’m certain you’re quite wrong in your analysis. I’m a man who at age 41 married a woman 11 years younger than me (after two years of dating). It wasn’t for hot sex - in fact I had something like a hundred different younger women who were lovers over the previous few years (I was a late bloomer) and I never considered marrying any of them. When I met my wife, she stood out sharply from the rest. Yes, she was/is attractive, but so were the other…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:28 PM
–

Except older men also attract younger women. My wife is nearly 12 years younger. When I was 41 I dated a woman who was 19 (she claimed to be 23, but later admitted to being only 19). I’ve dated several women who were between 10 to 16 years younger. It’s not uncommon. I get it, you’re pissed that men gain attraction as they age while women lose it. You have to come to grips with that truth despite the “unfairness” of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 07:44 PM
–

Actually, that’s not true. One of the first and most famous school shooters was a girl who complained about the unfairness girls suffered from. They made a hit song about it in the early 80’s. The point of my examples is that you’re comparing apples to oranges. Men are risk takers, women are risk averse. Therefore the most terrorists, shooters, emperors, bank robbers, daredevils and tycoons are nearly always going to be men. EDIT: I just recalled that early on in the feminist movement there were…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:47 PM
–

About as many feminists as have made a positive contribution to society - a few, but hardly any. Here’s a much better question. How many feminists have started billion dollar companies that have employed tens of thousands of people? Answer: ZERO
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:33 PM
–

Status absolutely arouses women, and money is a form of status. If status is combined with confidence and good looks, then it’s a potent mix that will be highly attractive to women. Furthermore, a great many men become more physically attractive as they age and gain status precisely because they gain better confidence and invest more time and dedication to their health. The bottom line is that, unlike women, men become more attractive and desirable as they age. As an exhaustive study concluded: …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:21 PM
–

It’s no more dangerous than feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 05:35 PM
–

“The Red Pill” is a legitimate point of view that predates the movie by some 200+ years. In its most “articulate” or “academic” version, the “red pill” philosophy is referred to by the french term “real politick” and concern’s itself with international politics. Basically, it’s the very reasonable proposition that there is a distinction between reasons and justifications. People do things for reasons and they often use justifications to obscure their reasons to avoid criticism. Example, we invad…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 04:09 PM
–

But tell me again how tough it is for men to approach women. It is tough - you can tell by the fact that women rarely ever do it when they’re sober because they’re too afraid. If it was easy (like wearing makeup or wearing sexy clothing are easy) then women would be approaching men all the time and few men would be lacking female attention. As it is, approaching women is so difficult and fear inducing that 2/3’s of men are usually very cautious when they do it and fully 1/3 of men never muster t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 02:59 PM
–

There’s a problem with this approach. Women are not monolithic and every woman is different; therefore, it’s almost impossible to know what a woman wants, when they want it and how they want it unless you know that woman relatively well. You’re right that some clues might give you some indication of what she wants, but not everyone sends consistent signals so even looking for “signs or signals” is problematic. Subtle signals are very difficult to read, especially since so many people deliberatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 02:27 PM
–

this every woman is evil is toxic… you should go out and talk to real women Have you talked to women? Seriously, half of them are neurotic and a good 5% of them are psychopathic. In fairness, half of men are likewise neurotic and about 5% are also psyho. If you’re a well adjusted man (or woman) who’s NOT neurotic/psycho, then you have to take significant steps to avoid the “wrong half” of the opposite gender. Yes, the “wrong half” are often attractive, exciting and a freak in bed, but Christ the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 10:33 AM
2

Nobody said you can’t interrupt men. Nobody said women can’t approach men (certainly you never said that). It’s a free country and it’s public space so anyone can approach anyone else. If you don’t like the concept of public space, then don’t go out in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 01:22 AM
8

The problem is viewing women as people with superior rights to privacy and autonomy. After all they are people- no more important, fragile or in need of protection than any other group of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 10:21 PM
–

Fear is the mind killer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:45 PM
–

Overcoming the fear of rejection (any rejection, not just romantic) is hugely liberating. We should all train ourselves to overcome this fear by actively seeking out rejection every day, several times a day, for a few months. There’s an excellent Ted talk on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:35 PM
14

What’s harder to understand is why anyone would not approach because they feared upsetting someone or making them them feel awkward. Imagine if private companies were too afraid of upsetting people to advertise their products or ask their employees to do their jobs? Imagine if shoppers were too afraid to ask store clerks for assistance or check out clerks to check them out. Imagine if kids were too intimidated to ask for food when they were hungry? Shopping, working, eating and dating are all pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 08:24 PM
–

Yes, they both leave, but it’s the duration in dating apps before they leave that accounts for the larger number of men being on dating apps. Women get their matches much faster - remember, a small number of men are getting a jot of matches while 50%+ are getting zero matches. Let me explain it this way - imagine two buckets (10 litres and 50 litres) each hooked up to a garden hose running at 5 litres a minute. Each bucket has an overflow spout. Eventually both buckets will be full. Their inflow…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 06:31 PM
–

Yes, but only a small minority of men are getting into relationships - remember the 80-20 rule. 50% of men get zero matches; therefore, they linger longer on dating apps trying for a match.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 01:50 PM
5

Actually, it’s false that men use online dating more than women. Women go on and most match quickly and then leave after finding a relationship or give up after several dates/sexual encounters. Since men match at a much lower rate, men stay on for a much longer time hoping to match. The process is essentially accelerated for most women as compared to men resulting in there being more men then women on dating apps at any given time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 03:15 AM
24

Menslib is thatway —>
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter