~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Why have men in search of masculine identity veered toward the 'manosphere' rather than a traditionally masculine identity based in benevolent patriarchy?I assumed you were a man because I associate red pill with men. It was an honest mistake and it didn't change how I responded to you. You seem really pressed that I understand that you don't personally endorse patriarchy, but it doesn't matter because you are still perpetuating harmful beliefs. Your belief that biological differences is at least partially responsible for the development of patriarchy is not "explaining how things got this way." It's just a watered-down version of "well, I don't … | /r/ExRedPill | 19/04/25 07:42 AM |
| 1 | Why have men in search of masculine identity veered toward the 'manosphere' rather than a traditionally masculine identity based in benevolent patriarchy?No. Stop putting words in people's mouths. Describing that systems are not black and white is not agreeing that unjust systems are necessary. I’m not putting words in your mouth — I’m drawing conclusions based on your arguments. If you think patriarchy developed at least in part due to biology, why wouldn’t you consider it to have been necessary for at least some point in history? Most biological things are necessary. I have a biological drive to breathe because I need oxygen to live. I have a b… | /r/ExRedPill | 19/04/25 04:35 AM |
| 1 | Why have men in search of masculine identity veered toward the 'manosphere' rather than a traditionally masculine identity based in benevolent patriarchy?I didn't create a problem. I am a woman born in the 90s. Safe to say, I did not create the problem of historical societal inequalities. I assumed you were a man, so my apologies for that. No one living today created the oppressive systems we live under, but we all have a responsibility to understand them and work towards ending them. Especially as women can perpetuate patriarchy just as much as men. If you think patriarchy could ever be “benevolent” or needed, you don’t understand the nature of … | /r/ExRedPill | 19/04/25 04:35 AM |
| 2 | Why have men in search of masculine identity veered toward the 'manosphere' rather than a traditionally masculine identity based in benevolent patriarchy?But they did so it was. How so? You don't get to create a problem, and then act like your "solution" was needed and something people should be grateful for. What was needed was for men to stop hoarding resources and oppressing women. Not to be nice about it when they do. I do think there is nuance as to how these systems come about. There are biological differences between average women and average men You're implying that these systems came about at least somewhat naturally, because "muh biolog… | /r/ExRedPill | 18/04/25 07:40 PM |
| 3 | Why have men in search of masculine identity veered toward the 'manosphere' rather than a traditionally masculine identity based in benevolent patriarchy?Reduction in the need for men to be benevolently patriarchal What you need to understand is that there was never a need for patriarchy -- benevolent or otherwise. Men created a FALSE need by hoarding resources so that women had no other recourse but to depend on men. If men hadn't hoarded the resources, there would be no false need for patriarchy. Like men actually hoarded resources at the expense of women and then made it seem like they were doing us a favor by sharing those resources, but only… | /r/ExRedPill | 18/04/25 06:19 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter