TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NextAdministration83 Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by NextAdministration83 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Their science is essentially the equivalent of a woman who says "all men/women are pigs" when they more accurately mean to say "all men/women I WANT/LIKE are pigs". Yes, there ARE women out there who are manipulative and take advantage of generous men while chasing their ovulating hormones after the "other" exciting guy. There's also men out there who consistently try and stealth women, who beat them behind closed doors. Now is HE or you exactly that, just because some bad apples share your geni…
/r/ExRedPill21/03/25 09:30 AM
43

Start with reflecting on your words for one thing. Technically, one is "forcing" themselves to go on a diet, to exercise, to face their fears- does this mean doing these things is inherently wrong or unfairly targeting on the individual to adapt to everyone else's preferences of WHO they should be vs what they're already content with being? Like yeah sure- you can keep eating whatever you want, being as unfit as you like, stick to your current trajectory of life if you want to- but everyone is a…
/r/ExRedPill13/02/25 02:20 AM
1

No, it doesn't. But yes it does. You're problem is that you're perceiving it in black/white. Ask yourself this- what's your thoughts/attraction towards a woman who has a great vibe but doesn't exactly fit the peak beauty you've come across in other potential interactions/dates....do you throw her away as an option entirely? Or do you acknowledge you still value her as an attractive person that you'd still find perfectly content and happy being with? Many women are equally as considerate towards …
/r/ExRedPill04/08/24 02:33 PM
3

With all due respect to your grandmother and her incredible conviction to your grandfather despite him not deserving it, I think it's important to point out that women from the 80s and earlier literally had no other actual choice but to stick with their man. Its not so much a biological gender thing as it is a patriarchal foot on the necks of women at the time. It wasn't until the 70s that women could open a bank account without her husbands signature. Sure some women would still cheat- but it's…
/r/ExRedPill23/04/24 11:32 PM
1

Think of it this way. You don't want to be equally as scummy, low-life and pathetically absent of maturity to match such lyrical artists and blatant misandry. You want to be regarded or at least have the pride to know you grew up past 17 and actually have the mental comprehension that such degradation adds absolutely no value to any conversation and is merely a spotlight of one's own incredibly smooth brain, as it highlights the very fact that person is incapable of making any point on an issue …
/r/ExRedPill13/03/24 09:32 AM
9

The greatest taint on genuine help for men will always come form the fragrant sensationalism RP spouts from the smallest of evidential truths. It's like gatcha games when they release new characters, content creators will flock to the news and acquire the new character asap and make content about how good/impressive it is asap- not because it's entirely true, but because it's new content to sell. Nofap has its truths. Daily abstinence from porn has genuine, proven benefits. But just like having …
/r/ExRedPill11/01/24 05:19 AM
27

I think his excuse that his advice is a "generalisation" is as valid as a woman focusing on the small % of men who commit 90% of crimes to validate "ALL men are _____ trust me sis". For the sake of argument lets point out women who speak like hoe math. You can imply your advice is just "generalisation" all you want, but if all throughout your videos and arguments you say: "This is why you can't trust men" "It's just natural man behaviour to..." "Women generally are better than..." "Men are condi…
/r/ExRedPill14/12/23 09:41 PM
19

I think they perceive it the same way one gets satisfaction watching a bully get humbled. Not exactly the same dynamic, but that's absolutely how Rp men perceive women. It's an experience of seeing someone normally regarding "better" and on a pedestal get treated/scrutinised to an equal level as these men experience often, either through online hate for his existence or from the literal alpha groups he follows.
/r/ExRedPill14/12/23 09:15 PM
4

Also add that men ALSO suffer infertility issues as they get older. Again- this "wall" is something MEN experience TOO. It's where I reckon this started, men in their 40s/50s thinking it's purely their wives fault for struggling to have kids, that only the WOMEN get tested for their fertility and not the men. Instead of thinking it's their own aging body they'd rather chase what media flaunts into the insecurity of all people, "young flesh".
/r/ExRedPill14/12/23 10:00 AM
1

I absolutely agree, and this crusade against Andrew Tate and those who succumb to his nonsense won't be solved through further shame and ridicule, but respectfully understanding the experience of men, and proactively applying psychological teaching through young men's development that allows them to have a more 'civil' sense of empowerment that isn't as hostile as MGTOW or mysogyny.... ...of course that is ultimately up to us men to provide. It's a bit ironic that some would argue women should b…
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 11:26 PM
2

That's because you've misinterpreted the analogy. Physical looks aren't the only unattractive trait. There's social skills, sexual performance, stamina, seduction, intimacy, fun, and many other traits of a person that dictate what said man/woman predominantly desires in a casual partner. If it was purely only physical traits, then the literal concept of communication/chatting would never even be heard of on society. Women experience a 'dirty swamp' of sorts not because most of men are ugly, but …
/r/ExRedPill21/08/22 09:20 PM
9

As in women don't always achieve nor experience an orgasm in sex, especially casual partners. So the similar experience for a guy would be closest to a partner wanting to stop before you get to cum. And yeah sure- she gets a lot of guys hitting on her. And how many of those guys is she actually reciprocating with? Zero. Because she doesn't need nor want someone else. She's happy with you. Because no doubt you tick off all the boxes, or at least show the potential and effort into doing so. "But i…
/r/ExRedPill21/08/22 12:03 AM
9

Firstly, those women catching feelings is not at all your fault if your made it clear it was purely a platonic, physically intimate relationship. And most importantly, made it CLEAR that being affectionate is just another form of intimacy to you. I've had them, they've been great friendships, and either side always made it clear when we wanted to move on, dial it back, or feeling something more. It's called emotional maturity. Any partner accusing the other of 'using them' in such an established…
/r/ExRedPill20/08/22 10:57 PM
2

You don't. But people are desperate to make sense of things, it's why we have the habit to assume, project, judge, accuse etc. It's easier for our brains to make up reasons that support our current habit of thinking than to be constantly challenging our mindset (and therefore encourage "growth"). And when your current habit of thinking is that of someone who's lonely, depressed, and frustrated over their failings to bond/feel desirable- it's no wonder red pill thinking is so engrained in miserab…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 08:11 PM
11

That you WILL have bad experiences. That you WILL meet people who are the absolute worst match for you and will ruin you either emotionally or mentally due so- but ultimately how effectively and for how long you deal with such ruin is based moreso on you're own emotional and mental maturity than their influence. Essentially- as a prospective seeker of intimacy/romance/bonding, you're bound to have clashes and bad eggs come your way who end up being the perfect partner to someone else. Because ev…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 11:55 AM
1

Name checks out. She isn't going to date you man.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 07:00 AM
1

I mean, I get the examples it makes as to how one can judge others so broadly and assumptiously (if that's a word??), But if someone is angry toward me, even passively, I don't owe them any extra-curricular dignity until they've equally displayed resentment to said emotional 'burst' of rude behaviour.
/r/ExRedPill27/07/22 07:00 AM
3

90% of the time it's not that the women are unattractive, it's just that the twitch streamer girl or OF creator they habitually follow gives an artificial belief to their standard of beauty. There's so many potential fun, sexual, intimate, loving women out there- but because they don't keep their tits as surgically perky as Amouranth or stay in makeup and doe-eyed as ______ these women are invisible.
/r/ExRedPill25/07/22 08:26 AM
48

There was a Reddit story earlier this week of a mid 40s man 'seduced' into having an affair with a 21yr old. He felt over the moon that she was into him. But once in the bedroom she was essentially a starfish- about as interesting and enthusiastic as a plank of wood, to the point he was uncertain if she actually wanted to have sex with him despite inviting herself to his hotel room. He regrets it, citing that his wife around his age was far more fun, creative, enthusiastic and loving- and you ca…
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 11:16 AM
2

Here's the thing. Yes height has an affect. But your mindset and her own maturity/shallowness is far more important and far more worth considering in the effort of dating. Women who vocally define your potential as a partner based on your height aren't looking for a loving loyal respectful man, they're looking for an accessory to advertise. There's nothing aspirational about dating or persuing those women- those kids who seem to still be stuck in high school with their immature need to use their…
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 11:09 AM
12

Before even bothering to dive into your links, your immediate mistake is assuming that ex-red pill/common sense maturity advocates some idea that dating is easy for men at all. No one says that. No one with genuine awareness has said that. The problem with RP is that it implies men's dating life is their only purpose for meaning, their only sign of value to the world and society, that being desirable by the vibrational frequency of a women's quivering legs is the sole symbol of self-worth for a …
/r/ExRedPill15/07/22 03:07 AM
2

I like to think it's the male equivalent of 'the horse girl'
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 07:09 PM
11

Yes. Anyone would want better than a partner who's clearly not trying anymore. Anyone COULD do better than a partner like that. That's the frustrating thing that constantly dangles from the argument of women being hypergamous by nature- men who argue this never seem to want to equally acknowledge the statistics of men who pursue younger women as affair partners or the masses of popular media that celebrate men monkey branching. (Wolf of Wall Street, Leonardo Di Caprio himself, Harvey Weinstein, …
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 12:05 PM
9

Hopefully insecure men read your comment as further proof your ability to have a job that earns money and producing testosterone are genuinely benign to women's attraction more than ever. Not to be too blunt, but reality is, what you've described as being valuable about you are bare minimums of a decent independent adult. You have a job that makes money? So does everyone else. In fact women achieve that on their own now, for understandably necessary reasons with the current economy. Women don't …
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 11:58 AM
12

We assume it's an issue of both incompatibility and general maturity. Sometimes your lifestyle, pursuits and ideologies just don't match in their view. They're allowed to think that, regardless of if you think they may be wrong. Sometimes one of you are just not as 'matured' as you might think. It's not just the man's fault, yes.... But we're definitely not purely victims either.
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 11:41 AM
19

Hence my last paragraph. Pot calling the kettle black to argue this is a whatboutism argument mate.
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 02:42 AM
24

In comparison to when a partner recieves a cancer diagnosis (not fatal, just diagnosis) men statistically initiate more divorces than women. Men are also statistically more likely to become physically abusive and control their partners lifestyle should she not abide by his wants and needs. We don't divorce as much because we resort to maiming our partners first.....that's not a better statistic to have. See^ I can skew generalized data to create a biased outlook too! According to my statement me…
/r/ExRedPill12/07/22 01:59 AM
28

Most of the time, a mature, emotionally intelligent woman doesn't find it necessary to branch out for 'something better'. Note I said necessary- not impossible. Truth is you're right to suspect she could grab a new man or plaything within the week. But to do so also requires some level of effort. Effort that entails risk (will this new prospect actually be better or worse? Will I feel safe with them?), Effort that requires you to also be either breaking things with your current security net of c…
/r/ExRedPill11/07/22 10:21 PM
50

It's also the problem that men often don't think to consider it as just being friendly and supportive, vs "I'm complimenting you give me penis".
/r/ExRedPill07/07/22 05:58 AM
27

Because they live a hypocritical mentality. They want all of this in a woman- but also the hottest, wildest, desirable woman they see in media and OF. The ones who are only like that BECAUSE they have the freedom to do so. They want the shy inexperienced virgin who's also into every kink imaginable and will call them daddy. They don't want a girl who's slept around but also someone who knows all the tricks if the trade in deep-throating. They want someone who is essentially their housemaid and l…
/r/ExRedPill03/07/22 12:45 PM
9

My guy gonna need you to proofread this entire post because it just reads as messy spitballing of thoughts. Summarise for us, what exactly are you seeking thoughts on?
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 06:13 AM
49

Anything proves their point if the confirmation bias is as strong as theirs. How do you feel about the breakdown of statistics and studies that proves men are generally rapists and violent people? Guess it's true and all women should see you as a potential rapist right? Since the data I can source with the same tunnel vision as FaF proves I'm right. When it comes to dating and relationships, anyone who makes a broad statement about a gender should be followed up with a "that I'm attracted to."
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 03:59 AM
8

I disagree just from looking at girl groups in highschool, and even many female-centric business groups. Narcissism, competitiveness and bullying is a universal behaviour. Psychological bullying is essentially the female bread and butter of harrassment, especially to their own gender. Passive insults are the norm among the equally insecure of women as men who constantly need to shame men who don't gym or have sex as much as them. He isn't acting like he isn't a man. He's acting like he isn't an …
/r/ExRedPill01/06/22 03:59 AM
3

At first read: no. Not sexist to have preferences, especially if it's simply in regards to what you genuinely have an attraction for. As long as you apply them as preferences and not boundaries- otherwise you're just as bad as those "mY mAn neEdS tO bE aT lEaST 6ft aNd 6 fIguReS" women out there. Alone and pessimistic about standards you yourself don't even deserve. After reading your comments: Feminine does NOT = woman. It's just MORE COMMONLY in women. Your pursuit of relationships/dating with…
/r/ExRedPill31/05/22 04:30 AM
4

Of course they do. Because they know it's an impossible thing to achieve naturally......"but if you buy OUR product all your problems will fade awayyyy!" Same for all the gym products you can buy beyond creatine and protein powder. The only evidential improvement beyond them is steroids. Anything else is nutritional piss shoved with coffee. Media is purposely driven to make you so insecure and uncertain about your capability that you NEED to be what they think you should be to be attractive. Rea…
/r/ExRedPill30/05/22 02:21 AM
8

The problem is when people take that research backing and apply the same merit to his more "2 cents of thought" regarding other topics that are more general and not so much specific to what he has research or experience in. Essentially his thoughts on dieting, economics, workplace structure etc. Aren't his expertise, and just because he has some professionalism in understanding how people can THEORETICALLY work and behave (in a field of science (psychology) that is constantly changing and subjec…
/r/ExRedPill25/05/22 12:55 AM
1

Well for one, relationships with men in all aspects can be mysoginistic experiences for women. Just as relationships with women in all aspects can be misandristic for men. It all depends on the individuals you have an aspect of a relationship with. Specifically in the context of my comment I refer to the men in relationships who expect women to be innocent virgins in every environment except the bedroom where they must be submissive whores that bend to the whims of HIS pleasure. It's like a woma…
/r/ExRedPill18/05/22 03:22 PM
2

There's a great saying I'm gonna steal from the bowels of the internet. Men are searching for drinkable water in a desert. Women are searching for drinkable water in a swamp. She certainly gained more quantity in experience. But what was the quality of those? Dickheads and assholes who likely ruined her joy in sexual expression due to their mysoginistic ideals. Also- personally- I'd rather my partner have at least 2 or 3 exes/old fwb. In 10 years I've never had a casual or serious partner who wa…
/r/ExRedPill18/05/22 02:42 AM
1

My point is that the average dude will receive this info of "porn industry = completely exploited/sex trafficking/it's basically rape with extra steps" but turn to their ever growing exposure to OF creators and other outlets of porn media that are filled with independent sex workers and immediately dismiss said warnings due to their own bias and preceding habits. "But _____ makes their own content. So how is porn ruining lives when the people I personally watch are doing it because they enjoy it…
/r/ExRedPill18/05/22 02:25 AM
6

Gonna have to challenge this preconception as there is actually a fair amount of genuine porn couples and performers who are independent and (as discussed on their social media through qanda's and sfw content) completely comfortable/safe in their porn content. This doesn't dismiss the fact that abuse in the industry exists, but with the rise of OF and pornhub enabling personal creators to develop a following without being trafficked by some major film company, porn nowadays actually has a rising…
/r/ExRedPill17/05/22 03:10 PM
6

Essentially, porn use numbs you to sex over time. You may have noticed that your first experiences with porn might've gotten you a release far easier than nowadays (depending on your frequency). And that's the main two issues: frequency and disruption. Ask yourself- How frequently am I masturbating daily? How often do I resort to porn/become mentally clouded by the idea of watching porn/stopping my current task or responsibility or activity to digest porn instead? If you fap maybe once a day wit…
/r/ExRedPill17/05/22 03:01 PM
13

So I get you're trying to apply a tactic of shaming here but I feel it's going too much into a deep end of implying literal criminal activity on his part. Considering you're a social worker it's no surprise your outlook on sex workers is predominantly "they have no other choice." Thing is by your own logic EVERY job that isn't a luscious carefree lifestyle is some sense of rape. Who goes to a mundane 9-5 job and NOT be purely motivated by the money and ability to feed mouths? Are fast food worke…
/r/ExRedPill09/05/22 11:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter