TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Nick30075 Archive

View 4 posts and 60 comments by Nick30075 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

It's been very heavily studied. This paper is probably a good starting point: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.87.4.494
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:55 PM
10

To the best of my knowledge, this will be the 3rd in the US; there's one in Arkansas and there were plans for another in Texas. 50% is a heck of an improvement!
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:04 PM
7

The case that you cited cites as precedent this older case, in which the victim was too young to legally hold a job but was still ordered to pay child support.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:44 AM
2

I don't think that this can be blamed on Trudeau. I looked at older versions of this law (going back to 2002) and the women-only parts were there then too. It's very clearly a feminist bill, but it's not Trudeau's policy, it predates him. Goodness knows people will say "you got the date wrong" to avoid discussing the law itself.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 03:02 AM
2

Yeah, this is the case that set the precedent. It's a bit old, but I've seen people ask where the idea came from legally so I posted it here.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 05:01 PM
3

General thoughts: 1) We don't punish the child for the sins of the father. North Korea does this, and it's barbaric--someone defects to SK, and their entire family is punished because the defector is no longer around to be punished. The same should apply here. 2) Women are shunted one way, and men are shunted another. How is "women being forced into the house" different in terms of "hurtfulness" than "men being forced into the fields?" The feminists who say this sort of thing are judging the suc…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 04:10 AM
1

Power isn't necessarily their goal. It could be, say, a desperate move to raise more funds. The ACLU seems to be in the same sort of pinch. The ALCU used to support people on both sides of the aisle but they've decided to oppose the anti-racial discrimination lawsuit against Harvard on the grounds that ending racial discrimination might inadvertently benefit white people. That might not be power-based, though--they got a lot of blowback and negative press defending Milo Yiannopolis and a lot of …
/r/MensRights27/01/19 06:58 AM
3

Sam Harris was classified as a "neo-Nazi gateway" for his criticism of the far left. He's a "never-Trumper" classical liberal type but the SPLC's view was that by exposing his audience to views contrary to the typical far left view of the world, he was doing as much to support neo-Nazis as Richard Spencer. He's been given the same "influencer" label as Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer. Way back in the early days of pro/anti-BLM, there was a pro-police facebook page where someone made two racist …
/r/MensRights27/01/19 06:46 AM
6

I'd appreciate a source on this, have a friend who'd be interested in the statistic.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:24 PM
11

If the original document for the poster were available, you could take it, edit it, and print more (possibly taping them over the existing sign). It would take a lot longer for someone to notice and would probably be more convincing to passerby. One could, say, add the following bullet point at the end: even when she confesses that she raped him and she filed a false accusation to confuse police--then, you just trust her original accusation. Then maybe in parentheses cite one of the handful of c…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 02:11 AM
8

I would accept that, if this were an area which his research indicated he was knowledgeable about. I would categorically refuse to testify about, say, combinatorics, because even though I'm in STEM, it's something I'm really not knowledgeable about. Furthermore, his justification in this case appears to be "pedophilia in women is not well-researched so it doesn't exist." This is a bit silly--for example, there wasn't a lot of research on domestic violence against men 20 years ago and we now know…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:17 AM
11

I've been trying to find this guy's bibliography and research history. The only paper of his that I've been able to find was a paper on the effects on social behavior caused by damage to the region of the brain responsible for balance (https://www.psychosomaticsjournal.com/article/S0033-3182(06)70032-9/abstract). If this is his modern research area (10 years does change a researcher, so grain of salt there), this is the stupidity equivalent of calling in an economist to testify about why a plane…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 02:23 AM
2

Yeah. A while back, there was a bit of an edit war between this subreddit and a bunch of feminists on Wikipedia about rape law. We were posting links to state legal code and case law demonstrating that these laws were discriminating against men, feminists were replacing them with feminist think pieces about rape culture and removing legal citations for being primary sources.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 02:56 AM
3

The ADAA cites this study pretty often, but the sample size is a tad small: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15707358_Posttraumatic_Stress_Disorder_in_the_National_Comorbidity_Survey As for rape/DV rates, the main source I'm citing is the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf (Note that they split off male rape victims into a "made to penetrate" category of sexual assault) IPH rates: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/424e/310beb3eaf43e38857ef9a8808e2046e18…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 07:02 PM
2

Case in New Hampshire, source is kind of crappy but it includes the lawsuit itself: https://www.thecollegefix.com/dartmouth-expelled-male-victim-sextortion-attempt-female-raped-lawsuit/ Local newspaper for a case in Ohio: https://whotv.com/2017/03/02/drake-expels-male-student-despite-female-claiming-she-forced-him-into-sex-act/ There's also a pretty well-known case in MA at Ahmerst University but it's a rather ambiguous case so I don't like citing it.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 04:50 PM
10

The gender ratio of victims of domestic violence is roughly 2:3 male:female, per the CDC. The gender ratio of dedicated DV shelters is worse than 2:300 male:female. You may wonder if men can actually be hurt by DV--well, women tend to account for strength differences by using weapons (this is reflected in intimate partner homicide statistics, women who do murder their partners (at a lower rate, of course) are about twice as likely to pick knifes for it--this is in turn reflected in homicide brut…
/r/MensRights07/10/18 05:56 AM
2

I've always found it interesting in arguments that result over this to bring up cases in which rapists filed false accusations against their victims in order to muddy the waters and get away with it. I've had a lot of success using it, it seems to calm people down if they're angry (because "using false accusations to get away with rape" is something that they don't want to come across as condoning) and makes them consider weird/outlier cases when they otherwise wouldn't.
/r/MensRights06/10/18 11:54 PM
3

Progress isn't done overnight, things aren't fixed overnight. If this is any indication of where society is heading, we should be happy. As I see it, social change is kind of like a damped pendulum. If you try to go too quickly (or damping is too low), you risk going too far in the opposite direction (for an example, consider how quickly race relations in South Africa reversed). Slow and steady is safe and guarantees that nothing ends up being broken in the long term.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:00 PM
5

I haven't really been following this. What do you mean by "got his calendars?" Do you have a link handy? The whole thing feels like the Chapel Hill case, where timelines don't seem to make sense and dates are changing. Edit: Ah, nevermind, I found the NYT article. I think that no matter what, it's going to end as a he-said/she-said sort of thing, it'll be damn near impossible to prove or disprove the validity of the calendars.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:30 AM
9

That last paragraph sounds a lot like what I've read coming out of feminist academia. Some of the great feminist writers do exactly this. I read Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman a while back for laughs and she spends ~20 pages laying out some crazy conspiracy theory about how aerothermodynamics as a field doesn't actually exist and the papers and results are all faked--but she hides it in this language about smoothness/roughness in nature and extended metaphors about femininity/masculinity…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:26 PM
21

I found the study that he's citing and, while I don't want to be a buzzkill, it's a bit of an unfair extrapolation. FBI report from 1996 puts provably "unfounded" rape claims at 8% of all cases. It's based on the FBI UCR, in which local law enforcement reports their data to the FBI. (See page 20 of https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/1996/96sec2.pdf) Compare that to rape conviction rates, which tend to hover around 5-10%. The other cases are presumed unknown. Assume the high end of 10%, 8/18=44…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:11 AM
5

Paying child support for a kid conceived via rape is much older than the Olivas case. Hermesmann v. Seyer (1991) is the relevant precedent.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:17 PM
9

No, a cosplayer accused him of sending two years worth of harassing Twitter messages, all of which she'd kept. WotC said "okay, show us and we'll ban him" and she refused to present them. There was community outrage of the "listen and believe" type, reddit mods deleted comments exonerating him, someone who happened to be one of the cosplayer's best friends somehow managed to watch two years worth of weekly livestreams and threw together a "highlight reel" in under 24 hours and tried to present t…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:50 AM
1

iirc she was a vegan activist but I don't know that she was a feminist. Her motivation also wasn't feminist in nature.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:52 AM
2

I might agree with you if the exact opposite hadn't already happened--Earl Silvermann. Most people went down the "it's not feminism's fault that feminists drove him into suicide" route and very few people even remember it.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 02:44 AM
1

That's a fair point, and it's really been my only criticism of reliance on the above paper, but I'd like to see numbers on what happens in those stages before making any claims about their effect.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:45 PM
6

I'd be skeptical of that figure. It's likely closer to 60% (given gender bias in prosecution, citation).
/r/MensRights19/07/18 03:45 PM
4

Putting women in war games is the gender equivalent of "whitewashing." I think that it's a silly thing to complain about either way but the core issue is the same.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:55 PM
42

Well, to some judges, child support isn't about the child at all, it's about the mother. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/recent-articles?id=24039 In that case, the father was granted primary custody and still ordered to pay child support to the mother. If the appeal fails, this case will become a statewide judicial precedent in Texas.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:36 PM
3

Yeah, I've been trying to find the source papers that the ADAA's statements about PTSD in male victims being more common than in female victims are derived from and I've had no luck either.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:40 PM
2

There's something related called "labeling theory" that argues that people conform to how they label themselves (and if that label is granted by others but the person believes it to be true, it's the same thing). It's one of the more well-accepted reasons why people who went to prison falsely are more likely to commit crimes when they get out than people who didn't go to prison--because they label themselves negatively. It has a few flaws and experimental evidence is fairly thin outside of crimi…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:29 AM
1

The state of Massachusetts requires that the victim be penetrated, excluding male victims: https://statelaws.findlaw.com/massachusetts-law/massachusetts-rape-laws.html South Carolina defines sexual battery as either forcible sexual intercourse (defined gender-neutrally) or inserting foreign objects (but not forcing insertion into foreign objects): http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c003.php The other states I've lived in (Texas and Virginia) are gender-neutral. Look here for an index: https://s…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:19 AM
1

There's a difference between saying "of course it works on paper" and "it's been tested." You should also bring up the effects of psychological disorders and ask if they've managed to cure sociopathy overnight--if not, then it becomes a problem of mitigation rather than prevention.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:48 PM
3

I would recommend citing this study: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1411131 The results are preliminary (localized sample) but it appears that teaching women to recognize and respond to dangerous situations actually works. Even if a "teach men to rape" campaign were possible to develop, we don't know how successful it might be. For a problem so immediate, it's best to do what we know works than take shots in the dark at what doesn't. As for responding to the demeaning nature of "tea…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 03:50 PM
8

Yeah, she changed. Her video on it. As for why she changed, she cites a few things in the video. She saw some attempted censorship in academia, started hanging out with some anti-SJWs and hearing them out, and so on. A lot of people think that the biggest thing was her dating an anti-SJW and trying to learn why he thought what he thought. Being open-minded is kind of a precondition for being objective. It irks me that people think that she's faking. She's had a lot of mud slung at her over this …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:58 PM
4

I'd recommend clearly laying out terms ("wage gap" vs "earnings gap") to prevent the sort of definitions-mongering that happens a lot in these debates. I'd recommend mentioning Chung's analysis of census data (summary here ) showing that young women out-earn young men, when only age is corrected for. You can use this to take the conversation a few different ways: 1) By correcting for a single factor other than gender, the earnings gap flips. This demonstrates conclusively that an analysis based …
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:48 PM
7

Can you give me a link to this? I have a friend who thinks that this sort of thing never happens and it's all paranoid delusions.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:34 PM
1

Oh hey, I posted this here a while back. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7c72fa/obscure_discriminationin_nc_a_man_assaulting_a/ I'm glad to see other people calling them out for it, even if they're outside of the vein of people I would usually expect to criticize the law.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:56 PM
1

There are a few oddball feminists who want to change that (the aforementioned Hoff Sommers comes to mind). I'm pretty sure that if I were older when all of the insanity of the past decade had manifested, I would have become a reformist instead of giving up and ditching feminism entirely.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:53 AM
16

My go-to response is "then why does feminism as a whole seem so intent to endorse these people?" If "egalitarian feminists" like Christina Hoff-Sommers are getting trashed by feminism as a whole while clearly radical individuals like Sally Gearhart are far more popular, then the movement supporting these radical perspectives is to blame. Essentially, you are who you vote for. edit: If I'd been born 30 years earlier, I'd probably be an "egalitarian feminist" too, the problem is how roundly the co…
/r/MensRights20/01/18 09:29 PM
2

I think that it's a bad idea. No matter how it's done, it'll be perceived negatively. Generally, expecting equal responsibilities from women is perceived as hostile towards women, not egalitarian.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 03:38 AM
11

That would be Erin Pizzey. Someone else linked the Wikipedia article which goes into more detail about the harassment. Her interview with Cassie Jaye is really interesting but for other reasons. Pt1
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:33 AM
6

There were a few people in mind when I said that. To the best of my knowledge, only one of them has been in a position in which the way she chose to lean mattered. In that case (a male coworker of hers was sexually assaulted) she stuck quite firmly on the man's side and went after their company's HR to make sure that they didn't automatically dismiss his claim because he was male (something that they'd done in the past). It's not always lip service.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:04 AM
30

I know quite a few feminists who agree with those of us in the MRA sphere on issues. There are certainly feminists who don't default to the "but patriarchy" to explain everything. Those sorts are a dying breed, certainly, but we shouldn't alienate them.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:17 PM
5

No hard evidence, the prosecution's only evidence outside of the girl's statements was another "witness" who didn't see anything and the judge even states did not provide trustworthy testimony. Importantly, his ruling even states that '[2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, however, the Court pointed out that the burden of proof placed upon the Crown lies “much closer to absolute certainty than to a balance of probabilities" ' so this whole thing looks to me, at least on paper, to be a bit ridiculous. The judge's…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:21 AM
15

Roughly 117 per year, for the curious.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:16 AM
2

If you want behavioral causes, I'd recommend looking at this paper. Long story short, "egalitarianism" towards women is perceived as hostility (it's viewed almost as negatively as discrimination against women) whereas "benevolent sexism" towards women is perceived positively. On the other hand, egalitarian and favorable views of men are perceived as roughly on par with one another. Society has a "skewed preference" towards women. The anti-egalitarian branch of feminism will have better social st…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:04 PM
11

I really don't like the "educate yourself" answer that SJWs give to people and I think it's wrong to do it here too. Answering him, circumcision only has hygenic benefits to men who don't know how to properly clean it. Circumcision appears to produce a tiny reduction in STD transmission rates but that's essentially irrelevant with how easy it is to get condoms nowadays. The handful of upsides that it offers are more or less irrelevant in modern society; it's almost entirely downside.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 07:05 AM
3

Bottom right of page 6, women get 28.9% shorter sentences. 1/(1-.289)=1.406, or 40.6% longer sentences for men than women.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:27 AM
9

From the report itself, "white female offenders received sentences that were 28.9 percent shorter than those of white male offenders in the Post-Report period" and "black male offenders’ sentences were 19.1 percent longer than those of white male offenders during the Post-Report period." edit: I'm aware that Starr's papers are better. I've read both of them. I was pointing out how Huffington Post covered the issue, rather than the issue itself.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 06:36 AM
2

Ah, yeah, I based my comments on the methodology section of the 2010 report, not the full 2011 report. The second one makes the most sense as well but the first one is likely making a (small) contribution.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 02:06 AM
2

1) Yes. I lost an internship after the company rolled back its interviewing process to the second round to get more "diversity applicants" in hopes of cashing in on a proposed tax break. The woman who got the position had a GPA more than 1.0 worse than mine, no relevant work experience, and two open cases with the university's honor court--but she was one of only two women who applied to the position. 2) n/a 3) I was stumbling around the internet and found one of Karen Straughan's videos. I didn…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:39 AM
3

The CDC doesn't clarify how they get "lifetime" estimates--did they take 12-month data and correct for underreporting and risk rates by age group? Or did they actually ask "have you ever been..." and "in the past 12 months, have you been...?" I'm not sure. EDIT: They just asked, no wonky underreporting corrections. I asked this after reading the 2010's methodology section, not the 2011's. The mappings from 12-month risk to lifetime risk are different for men and women and this is hard to rationa…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:21 AM
3

Yeah, he put this on a bunch of other cruddy subs, MGTOWs and whatnot. This seems shady.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:20 AM
1

I got a lot of hate from people I talked it over with and, looking at the stance of the industry I work in (tech), I decided to go back into the MRA closet. I've offhandedly mentioned something pro-MRA once since then and it attracted a lot of negative attention.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:37 AM
11

Has she tried taking it up with the professor to try to contest the grades? If so, what was his/her opinion? Was it that she deserved to fail for "wrongthink?" If so that's pretty blatant and you should go to the department head. When talking to the department head, DO NOT threaten a lawsuit. That's a free out for them to get their legal team involved and stonewall you into oblivion. If you have to threaten anything, threaten to go to the press--they'll probably know how badly Evergreen State fa…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:43 PM
2

In response to your comment, I looked at the criminal code of the three states I've lived in and all of them have gender-neutral classifications for simple assault. I don't think that this is part of a broader pattern but I could well be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:58 PM
6

Your recollection is correct--the SC ruled that it's okay for laws to be sexist if one gender is more "at risk" on average (see Michael M v Sonoma County--the SC state that since teenage pregnancies are more burdensome for mothers than fathers, it's appropriate for statutory rape law to exclude men entirely). It's a poor ruling, in my opinion, since in general it only makes sense for punishments to be based on the damage to the victim (on a case-by-case basis, not on average).
/r/MensRights11/11/17 03:53 PM
22

I was going through North Carolina's criminal code looking for something tangentially related and saw this. In NC, misdemeanors are ranked A1>1>2>3 and carry (max) sentences of 150/120/60/20 days in jail and fines of up to unlimited/unlimited/$1000/$200. It's a pretty simple but clear example of explicit discrimination against men in the legal system. I figured that one or two of you might find a use for it.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 07:10 AM
49

I remember talking with a therapist back when I lived in Virginia and he said that about 20% of the (female) rape victims he dealt with had orgasms while being raped. According to him, those were the most traumatic cases, as the women involved felt as though their bodies betrayed them. I'd definitely mention that in this context (and it also applies to the "having an erection counts as consent" argument that some feminists use).
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter