TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NickRausch Archive

View 0 posts and 253 comments by NickRausch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

The 350z really says it all
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/12/20 02:27 PM
14

Else if(){ } Else if(){ }
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/20 11:21 PM
2

Lol Bob
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/06/20 02:15 AM
1

Lots of people falsely believe that men cannot be raped. Namely anyone familiar with old common law. Traditionally the set of circumstances that constituted rape were rather narrow compared to the perceptions of many today.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:11 AM
2

If only Rosa parks had taken your advice and got off the bus. She did get off the bus, in fact the whole or nearly the whole black population of Montgomery got off the bus for almost a year. They called it the Montgomery Bus Boycott and it was a major event of the civil rights movement.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:45 PM
1

Threatening someone with a gun is never a appropriate response. So the cops were wrong when they came into his room with guns?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:40 PM
2

Gosh there is so much I wish I could say to you, but I think I will just start with this. Have you ever considered that things do not become morally legitimate just because they are done by the state(ie a judge or a cop)?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:03 AM
0

The only "crimes" had to do with marijuana. Having guns knives and anti government sentiments is not criteria for taking kids. The statements we have are all as told by the officers, and Florida cops have one of the worst good old boys reputation in the country. People forced their way into where this family was, threw him in cuffs and took the kids. That is assault, battery and kidnapping. None of it is a crime however because they were wearing uniforms when they did it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:54 AM
0

It is kidnapping when the state takes someones kids over marijuana and hearsay.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:31 AM
1

Force is an element of the crime, there have been court cases that hinged on the issue.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:40 AM
1

Common law rape is having sex with an unwilling woman though use of force or threat of force.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:31 AM
-6

Traditionally no, legally maybe.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:05 AM
1

The laws concerning the queen in the UK itself haven't really changed?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:04 PM
1

Most people wouldn't call Victoria a figurehead and royal power has not changed substantially since her reign.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:06 AM
1

You know she can appoint like half their government right?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:28 PM
1

Oh Jesus, a kind of funny kind of lighthearted film just went into total WTF land and then the romantic interest blames the somewhat scarred dude.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:34 AM
1

Thomas Szasz had most psychology right.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:25 AM
0

When you don't like either you might as well fire the incumbent. If Romney was any less irritating I would vote for him.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:36 AM
1

Write some letters and be sure to include the phrase hostile learning environment if you think it is applicable to your situation.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:56 PM
2

Women are usually the recipients of far more state benefits than men. Most government raise a noticeably greater amount of their income from men.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:41 PM
3

If you are looking for the superior earnings sign up sheet it is at the entrance to the mine shaft or at the end of an engineering program.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:03 PM
1

Nope, and it would be breathtakingly easy to find me in real life.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:13 PM
0

How is this a big issue? Birth control is cheaper and more available than it ever has been before. There are groups that give away condoms in just about every town. If that isn't good enough they can be bought by the thousand online and shipped to your door. That is right, you could have sex twice a day for a year and still have a few months worth left. If that isn't enough there are cheap generic birth control pills at just about every pharmacy and Walmart in the country.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:14 AM
0

Uncle toms
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:17 AM
15

Bluntly stated, a "woman's view" on how to run our semiconductor company does not help us, unless that woman has an advanced technical degree and experience as a CEO. T.J. Rodgers
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:30 AM
5

Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:35 AM
18

I find it rather taxing
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:36 AM
2

So if a woman has a rape fantasy and then is later raped it doesn't cont?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 05:51 PM
1

Call the cops and tell them that you have been attacked and fear you might be attacked again. I would say buy a gun and look into getting a CC license, but being that you used the world chav, I doubt that is possible for you.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 04:26 AM
1

In most free countries there is a right not to talk to the police. Talking to them just provides more evidence that can be used against you at a trial if they feel inclined to proceed to that point. Therefore many people opt to not speak to the police and just force them to decide if they have the evidence to try them and make their stand in court. YOU ARE PANTS ON HEAD RETARDED TO SPEAK TO THE POLICE WHEN THEY ARE INVESTIGATING YOU.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:37 PM
1

It should be obvious that when it's word against word, not using your words would result in a word against nothing situation. That is during the trial, when you are answering for specific charges the government is throwing at you.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 02:58 PM
1

You don't see any conflict in what you are saying? Assuming guilt on account of someone refusing to co-operate with the police, or rather exercising the right not to incriminate ones self is wrong. Just shutting up is designed to protect the innocent.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 09:49 PM
0

So the police should be able to arrest anyone they want for questioning? Don't people in these countries have the right to not incriminate themselves, ie not talk to the police.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 08:10 AM
0

Yes, being able to grab people off the street, hold and question them without charges is some gestapo shit and just about every western country has laws against it.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 10:23 PM
-1

Well, any country that can arrest you and drag you to a station for "questioning" without any charges has some messed up sense of justice. Any country that would be complicit in sending you back there isn't to be trusted either.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 12:42 AM
3

See, he gets violent when he isn't in control, smashing things to vent his frustration. Better not be around him when he goes from objects to women, almost inevitable as that is how he thinks of them anyway</s>
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:54 AM
1

It is based on the same wild notion of seeing all kinds of cooperative associations as systems of oppression.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:11 PM
1

Not usually, but it is typical when violence is involved.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:37 AM
1

'pure' classical communism comes mostly from Marx who was writing about some culture changing upheaval and revolution based on his interpretations of economic conditions that have long become a thing of the past. Classical communism had its chance and we never got past the dictatorship of the proletariat.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:24 AM
1

Much of Feminism is closely related to Marxism as it embraces a model where certain classes of people oppress other classes of people. I don't really buy into that, seeing things more like cloud of people constantly shifting and finding new ways to work together. We are also stuck with the fact that the net effect of government taxes/programs is a country wide transfer of resources from men to women. If you are a socialist, I guess that is what it is, I used to have a lot more sympathy for that …
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:18 AM
1

I am very libertarian and I think circumcision as it is done now should be illegal. People should be free to live their lives as they see fit, but that does not extend to mutilating children.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:10 AM
3

In a certain sense the welfare state discriminates against men since it raises more of its money from men and spends more of it on women, leading to a net transfer of wealth from men to women.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:05 AM
6

Calling someone a racist works the same way. Not to say there are not racists out there, but it is often thrown at someone to marginalize them and stifle any further discussion of the issues.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 09:42 PM
3

I say do it. Fold every support group or center into whatever office handles student health and be done with it. Tuition is going up every year and many of these offices are hardly used by the students.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:16 AM
2

the wife sent 3 or 4 of her "guy friends" over to the husband's place with a taser. In a lot of states people who try that kind of stuff end up dead.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:53 PM
1

College shouldn't involved with this anyway. These are crimes to be dealt with by the cops. It is a shame the government decided to force colleges into the equation.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:37 PM
1

It is actually classical liberalism. Double standards and unequal treatment by the state are certainly issues for the movement.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:59 PM
1

If someone can copy all your hard work the second it hits the market it destroys incentive to invent things. Therefore there is a temporary period where the inventor has exclusive rights to his/her developments. For that time that development is a piece of property just like any other. It still does not typically stop people from doing stuff. No one managed to close down the market on digital cameras, MP3 players and cell phones. I can go into a store anywhere in the country and be able to pick …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:39 AM
1

Yes, certain goods can only be made by certain people. I can't buy a beetle at a Nissan dealership, yet they are offering alternative goods and competition goes on. This is kind of like the time cube guy. It is hard to debate someone who believes stuff this far out just because we can't even create a frame of reference.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:16 AM
1

Neither of your examples supports your baseless conjecture that markets always end in monopoly. Your second paragraph indicates a lack of understanding of capitalism and is so off the wall that it is frankly difficult to respond to. I wouldn't say that, and very few people would because it does not make any sense. There is no right in capitalism to use other people's intellectual property any more than there is a right to walk into a competitors factory and use their machines. The best examples …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:32 AM
1

As you may have noticed I am no conservative. It is strange that you consider this some tangent meant to drag the movement elsewhere. The fact that men are being treated unfairly at the hands of the state is one of, it not the core issue of the movement.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:12 AM
1

At&t was a government monopoly, and breaking up Microsoft is retarded. Microsoft controls such a large portion of the software market because it is very good at its job. They were being sued for including a browser in their OS, which in retrospect is outright ridiculous. And for a true Capitalist system the patent system would have to be rescinded, because a functional capitalist system requires competition on an even basis. when someone has absolute right to a technology or process it's hard to…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:04 AM
1

That is accounted for in the video. The janitor and garbage man's value is tied to how well they clean. It is part of the wealth generation process. Specificly how much it is worth is somewhat subjective, but in practical terms it is worth whatever the janitor will sell it for. And as a final note, the only way Monopolies arise in a free market is if one company does the job so well that there is no way anyone else can do it better. Any system as stupid as you describe would not last. Sounds lik…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:58 PM
1

but no average individual can afford infrastructure projects. No "average" individual has to. An average individual does not know the best place to invest research funds But the people running research companies are capable of evaluating how promising research is. If you believe that the only reason the soviets fell was because they were a dictatorship then I have some bad news for you, the second largest economy in the world (and by some accounts the largest) China is as well. China, which has …
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:31 PM
1

In the 1800s the US government spending at all levels accounted for less than 10% of GDP. We went from being a frontier nowhere to the largest economy in history. The Soviet Union planned and ran all the research and factories, and they were gone in less than a century. When people are free to make their own decisions, they will make better lives for themselves. While it is attractive to believe the promises that the government can manage us and make everything better, it does not typically end …
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:04 PM
1

I guess that is just the difference between people who believe in freedom and those who don't.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:43 PM
1

I think that the roll of legtimate government is to maintain the roads, borders and the rights of its citizens. You think that it is some kind of resource distribution service If you personally can't force your neighbor to pay for your contraceptives, than you should not be able to have the government do it for you.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:34 PM
1

We are not talking about the people who don't have a problem with it, we are talking about the morality of hurting people who for whatever reason do. You are totally missing the point. This is not about selfishness at all.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 08:15 PM
1

George ought to help
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:28 PM
1

The government raises a larger percentage of its revenue from men, and spends a larger percentage of its budget on women. This net wealth transfer is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:52 PM
1

If it is a given or an absolute, why do you need guns to make it happen?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:45 PM
1

The problem isn't with these arguments, the problem is with minimum wage laws. related
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:38 PM
0

People have rights, namely to life, liberty, property and the right to use force to defend these things. The state, in its legitimate form is just the substitution of common force for all the individual forces that make it up. Anything beyond that is using or threatening violence on nonviolent people, which makes me uncomfortable, and therefore I would like to live in a society that is organized more from the bottom up through voluntary associations, than from the top down with state cohesion. F…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:50 PM
-1

It relies on violence to force people into participating. If it is such a good idea, make your case to people and collect money. That is my serious answer. My cynical answer would be, clearly the way to save the most money in the long run with be to cut the social support while we are at it.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:51 AM
2

There is enough competition, at least in most places there is.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 06:28 AM
10

Date women who know themselves better in their 30s Baby crazy years or date a single mom who doesn't want more kids. She already got pregnant and kept it once.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:59 PM
1

No shit they would have freaked out. If this news story listed all the major evidence though, the truth is it is kind of on the light side. The real shame is how often these things get turned into a circus.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:53 AM
7

is this sarcasm, because I can't recognize sarcasm till after 10:15
/r/MensRights27/03/12 12:52 PM
9

No fun allowed. Seriously, does freedom of expression mean nothing to you?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 12:32 PM
3

If it is going to be a race to the bottom I guess I could just buy her a chastity belt with 'property of nickrausch' engraved on it. disclaimer: I wouldn't advocate or participate in a relationship based around such things.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:15 AM
7

Judges have total immunity, in the US at least.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:50 PM
3

I am somewhat amused at the colossal reaction and talk about a "war on women" over what is clearly campaign grandstanding. They don't seem to realize or care that men don't have shit in the way of reproductive choices. I think that birth control is a personal choice, so the government should not be able to ban it, but unlike many, as a personal choice, it is likewise inappropriate for the government to force people to buy it.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:32 PM
-2

How many people have the FBI prosecuted for rape?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:04 AM
-4

Dictionaries and most jurisdictions disagree.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:57 PM
-4

I think sexual assault or sexual battery would be a better term for what happened there.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:05 PM
1

No one is forcing her to take birth control, or get a job, or not get married, or get an abortion. Yet they are forcing her to pay for them.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 06:06 PM
1

Not to mention he made himself the public face of the opposition, so anyone who opposed it seemed like a backwards screwball too.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:38 AM
5

I am libertarian to the core, but it is a vicious assault and a gross violation of the child's rights.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:21 PM
0

So much I would like addressed. I think I would end infant genital mutilation. It seems the most widespread and one of the most barbaric things.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:19 PM
4

It is worth noting the disdain many feminists have for traditional women, or any women really who don't want to toe the line. They try very hard to equate themselves and their cause with all women. Socially conservative women often seem a bit more agreeable, but ultimately I think they still diverge from what most of us here are interested in.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:16 PM
1

All that information that they then look over and come up with an idea of how much you are expected to cost them based on all they know about you.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:22 PM
1

If I had no way of knowing how much work they could do, yes, I would go off the facts I had.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:42 PM
0

If I only had limited information on someone when I was making hires, I would pay women less for physical labor.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 12:15 AM
0

They are providing a service. They will lose money based on your ideas of "fairness". They don't make those numbers up, they are based on data, and the data indicates that men are typically more expensive to insure, so they charge more.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:36 AM
2

Yes, if they feel like they are paying an unreasonable amount.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:25 AM
2

Seems like it is only mandatory to drive.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:11 AM
1

Such as nowhere?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 01:53 AM
2

They are allowed to charge higher prices for women.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:39 PM
0

If you don't think it is fair don't buy insurance. They charge more because everything they know about you indicates that you are a higher risk. Your idea that you should be able to dictate prices to someone providing a service is unfair.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:08 PM
0

It isn't assuming, it is what their actuaries have told them. If you ever open a car insurance company, you can run it however you deem "fair".
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:05 PM
0

Now you don't take them seriously? They went off the deep end years ago.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:18 PM
1

The government oppresses people. I mean, feel free to talk about discrimination in jobs, or unhealthy cultural messages, or marxist class theory, but real oppression comes from the government. Sure the cudgel might be wielded by one group or another or used against one group or another, but the thing that remains the same is government force.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:17 AM
5

I didn't vote for him before he was a war criminal, why would I vote for him now that he is?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:06 PM
1

http://www.cypress.com/?rID=34986 T.J. Rodgers related
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:37 PM
-1

Yes, using the word nigger to make a point is OK, it is certainly used in far more causal contexts. Furthermore, I never claimed it was equal to slavery, I was just pointing out the similarity to the situation Malcom X described, in which some people will just side with the power group in order to try to gain power, even though they will never really be accepted. Edit: and interestingly enough there is a video on the front page right now with a guy who uses the phrase.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:13 AM
-3

Keep your contextually ignorant condescending bullshit out of our subreddit, asshole. :\
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:59 PM
1

Even the house nigger is still just a nigger in the end.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:27 PM
2

Everyone has the option, the real question is if there is a "right" to force the rest of us to finance your choices.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:56 PM
2

Two years later, when Mischa was 14-years-old, his rights were honored. On April 22, in the remand hearing in Jackson County, Oregon, the boy privately testified in the judge’s chambers with neither of his parents allowed to be present. Misha told the judge that he did NOT want to be circumcised and did NOT want to be Jewish Apparently you can't, thank god.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:27 PM
1

He learned it the hard way.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:36 PM
24

When I saw the white man in the alley I didn't mug him. My big lips are not for threats.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:16 PM
1

As long as it is private money it does not really matter.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:14 AM
2

If he wants to pay for incompetent eye candy why shouldn't he? It is his money to waste.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:07 PM
1

Is it discrimination? Yes. Does it really make much of a difference? No.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 11:56 PM
0

Gay is not the way!
/r/MensRights24/01/12 07:56 PM
1

It is a pretty sweet racket
/r/MensRights17/01/12 05:12 AM
14

The good men project is similar to what Malcolm X referred to as "House Niggers".
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:31 PM
4

Modern people have very little concept of what chivalry actually is. It is a warrior code which applies to certain social classes, and to a lesser extent the people associated with those classes. Historical chivalry only applied to a small number of men and had little to do with women, and the parts that did were not about women so much as they were about a rather small number of women. Next time you hear someone talk about chivalry, ask them how much land their family owns. If the answer does n…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:28 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with going for a degree. If a university is not accredited or just gives them to people who don't know their stuff, the university quickly gets a reputation as being crap. The degree basically says you completed the program. To complete most programs you need to learn a lot of stuff. Frankly it is rather strange that you seem to think a university should throw people through a few years of courses and then not put their name on the line for the graduates.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:04 PM
-1

Those men can still get married, just not to each other. It is past time that people realize we should not rely on the government to define our personal lives.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 11:42 PM
2

Universities have reputations to uphold. If they hand out qualifications to just anyone they won't be certified and will be known as a diploma mill. Degree programs are not the problem here. The problem is that they are obligated to get involved in the personal lives of their students and police matters or lose federal funding.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:33 PM
2

That and the Federals told them to do it.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:29 PM
1

I am a supporter of the "financial abortion". I would like to see equal say, and due to biology this seems like the closest we are going to get. Perhaps if he could ask that the embryo be harvested and put on ice for him... but I don't see this as a very practical answer.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 01:56 AM
1

He should have no obligation to add anything to the table he does not want to, financial or otherwise.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 11:03 PM
0

Why should I? The child's perspective is something that was created by the choices of someone else, and as such it is their problem. The only way to deal with it is to remove the incentive to create this problem to begin with. As soon as society admits that people who have sex under false pretenses or have children with neither a partner on the same page, nor any reasonable plan to raise it are the ones to blame, you will see a rapid decrease in the amount of children in this situation.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:30 AM
2

Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. Furthermore since it wasn't his choice, it isn't his responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 05:55 AM
2

argentino detected.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 07:35 PM
12

There is a constitutional right to confront one's accuser. It is despicable the Supreme Court does not want to enforce it.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 03:34 AM
5

this looks like a troll
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:09 AM
7

Then they get government and advocacy jobs where their salaries are paid by people who do real work.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 04:19 PM
3

I might boycott the sponsors. It is there money, they should be allowed to do what they want with it.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 06:05 AM
2

Apparently he does.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:46 PM
1

Common-law marriage, in the US at least, requires that they consider themselves to be married and present themselves as such.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:29 PM
1

Missed it, but the responses more or less tell it like it is. I guess part of the "job" is to consistently please the person who is feeding and housing her.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:27 PM
2

Whatever, he is apparently getting paid enough that it is worth it to him to keep a woman around. Not many people do, but if he does, it is his money to spend.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:25 PM
15

Don't get married. If you don't live in a common law marriage state you can even be "husband and wife" if that is how you want to live. Just don't get the government involved.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:12 PM
4

The problem is that it is a solution to a problem that does not exist. People have a right to do what they want with their bodies. I don't need the federal government telling me how to have a family.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 01:57 AM
2

"Affirmative Action" is no more than newspeak for open discrimination. It is nothing but a nastier incarnation of group politics and collectivism.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:46 PM
1

10 women in a class of 50. You'd have to lose 30 men to reach parity, or somehow add 40 women. o,O
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:25 PM
2

My program would probably welcome them with open arms, but I don't think there are that many who are interested. The girls that are in the computer and engineering programs are in them because they are serious and interested in the program. I would far rather have a few women like them than half the class just there to take up space.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:38 AM
2

The US does not have hate speech laws, we are a free country in that regard.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 04:14 PM
-3

I can't imagine what kind of controlling, woman beating sicko you must be to even ask that. Go back to Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 06:32 PM
3

The male's individuality, which she is acutely aware of, but which she doesn't comprehend and isn't capable of relating to or grasping emotionally, frightens and upsets her and fills her with envy. So she denies it in him and proceeds to define everyone in terms of hers or his function or use Well shit
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:14 AM
0

If you are not feeding it to her everyday, she is not on the pill.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:12 AM
7

Even in a vacuum this is rather unsettling.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:10 AM
1

Innocence? The article says he is a man doesn't it?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:02 PM
0

Chivalry does not mean what women think it means. It is a martial code, that applies only to certain classes of society, and is mostly not about women at all. Next time a woman says something about chivalry ask her how many acres of land her family owns.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 09:58 PM
23

It is an American Football term. The team makes a pass way down range and just kind of hopes someone catches it. Kind of a last ditch effort. In this context it was based on a strategy from the Tom Leykis show. Someone called in with a similar situation and he told the guy to tell his girlfriend how much he loves her, how much he wants to have a child with her someday, but he just isn't ready right now. Then ask her to have an abortion because they are not ready yet. After the abortion dump her …
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:27 PM
11

Time for the Hail Mary?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:58 PM
8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tQSOlF9ZZM I am told that they get government funding to peddle this filth.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:55 PM
3

Why are federal councils always the answer? I think we would be better off just eliminating the council on women, cheaper too.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 01:53 AM
5

That quasi marxist drivel is very hostile to my beliefs.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 03:24 PM
3

Yes
/r/MensRights23/11/11 05:26 AM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights23/11/11 05:25 AM
6

No they shouldn't, government or people who do business with government shouldn't be allowed to, but to say people should be forced to do business with people they don't want to shows no respect for property and freedom of association. While tasteless, there is no "right" for a man to have a room in someone else's hotel at all.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 12:31 AM
4

There is a difference between wanting discrimination against a group, and recognizing that property owners shouldn't be forced to do business with people. Would you say people who believe in free speech are all big fans of Neo-Nazis?
/r/MensRights22/11/11 10:17 PM
3

Smell the glove
/r/MensRights19/11/11 03:18 AM
2

Slightly worse is a matter of perspective. I was really trying to point out the growing gap between US children and children from other countries. If parents had more choice in where to send their kids to school I think it would go a long way to improving the system.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 07:04 PM
2

I went to an all boys school. It was preppy but pretty laid back. I am still close with some of my friends. I didn't get messed up socially, and I got into a nice university. I don't really think of it as a problem of our education system failing boys, but it failing both girls and boys, with boys failing slightly worse.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:00 PM
2

The part where this system breaks down however it that it requires the sanction of the victim. I do not accept it and see it for what it is, the ideology of a leech.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 05:04 AM
2

Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that financial abortions would show people in general how many women care only about themselves. I base my sense of morality off of facts, not the misdirected feelings of resentment caused by the actions of others.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 04:22 AM
6

The real question is why should I care? If it wasn't my choice, it isn't my responsibility. Choosing to have sex is not choosing to be a father.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 03:11 AM
12

Exactly, the problem isn't that women are getting light punishments, but that men are getting really bad ones. This seems like an appropriate consequence.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:02 PM
2

I am digging the Atlas Shrugged solution.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:06 PM
4

Hey, these people are not paying their rapists they are paying for the innocent child. It is all for the good of the child. Besides, a man getting raped? He totally wanted it. Take some fucking responsibility deadbeat!
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:30 AM
5

Lesbian trans women? Built in strapon? Another nutcase who figured how to put up a website with nothing better to do than make articles about posts on other websites? Is this a political movement or absurdist comedy?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:04 AM
1

Mass poisoning is against the law, no one is saying we should get rid of manslaughter and murder. The EPA does not protect the environment, it is bought and paid for.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:36 PM
1

Do you even live in the real world? Lawyers do probono work, and there are no shortage of ones who work on contingency fees. There are lawyers lining up around the block for class actions looking to take a bite out of the "big guys". The "crimes" and "violations" that libertarians rail against are things we could all live without. Law is meant to protect other people and other people's property. Bad law dictates how people should conduct their personal and business lives. This is not some anarch…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 02:43 PM
1

The rich and powerful run amok in statist systems as they can pay for rules they want. Rich people can't just "run amok" because they get in jail if they commit crimes, or in court if they wrong other people. Sometimes they would end up in both. Fraud and negligence are not alright in libertarianism. There is no "being good" or "behaving" just going through life without being messed with unless you are hurting other people.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 01:45 AM
2

Alright, you just don't understand what libertarian means.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:24 PM
1

Angola is a shithole because it was in a decades long civil war. It is not a free government and is not libertarian. Due to the relatively free economy however, it has been one of the fastest developing nations in the world. Also, you have to look at government spending, not taxes because that is a real look at the size of government compared to the economy. As long as we are cherry picking African shitholes lets have a look at Somalia. A wannabe welfare state that was so bad that the quality of…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:08 PM
1

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire is a book marked by lack of perspective, bad interpretations and is no longer considered a good resource on the late empire.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:53 PM
-1

Libertarianism is not what they have in African and third world countries. In fact many of these countries are governed by some bizarre form of Marxist state. Places like Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand and Switzerland are very libertarian economically and are also very healthy. Third world shitholes on the other hand tend to have a ton of economic controls.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:15 PM
1

UK doesn't have a constitution but we still have protections to prevent inocent people from being locked up. UK.... we So you don't really have a horse in this race then do you? I Don't really care that their living standards are marginally higher than ours. The US population has always been fed by waves of dirt poor immigrants, so if anything it is a wonder our living standards are as high as they are.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:06 PM
-3

guns are awesome and anyone who disagrees is a communist.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:57 PM
2

Doubleplus ungood oldthinker!
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:55 PM
1

At least I get laid for my troubles, as opposed to raped in prison. :P
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:53 PM
8

it aint an engineering degree.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 02:59 PM
1

9-9-9!
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:00 AM
2

I would say just document everything and sit on it unless something happens. Unfortunately the cops deal with this sort of situation, you might be best just getting your side in first just to protect yourself.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 05:38 PM
1

No, it is mandatory, as in every time they get a dv call, they are supposed to arrest someone. Besides, a bruise is still not necessarily probable cause.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 03:57 AM
0

You need probable cause to arrest someone. The neighbors called the cops is not necessarily probable cause
/r/MensRights26/10/11 03:10 AM
1

It is illegal to arrest someone without evidence. Mandatory arrest means someone is getting arrested every time.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 02:48 AM
1

Mandatory arrest policies are unconstitutional too.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 02:21 AM
1

People naturally find ways to take care of one another and work together. I think it is inefficient to mandate it from the top down, and immoral to back the system with force.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 03:45 PM
1

feminists call this argument "blaming the victim"
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:21 AM
1

This assumes that "people" and "employers" approach negotiations about benefits from an equal standpoint. That has never been my experience. The days of slavery, serfdom and indentured help are long gone. Either party can say, fuck this I don't need you and that is it. As a member of society, you'll be entitled to have other people's children meet your needs. That is downright offensive. I don't support enslaving someone just for being born after I was. My retirement will either be on my own mea…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 01:11 AM
1

Oh noes! In Sweden, they strip workers of their right to not have parental leave! Essentially they do. Instead of letting people and their employers come to an agreement about what works best, everyone just gets slapped with the one size fits all package and told it is for their own good. I am not going to be taking parental leave, therefore I am getting less compensation than I deserve for my work.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:14 PM
1

Those are issues of equality under the law, not stripping workers of their rights.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 09:03 PM
1

There are trade offs in everything, and babies tend to do better when they have a roof over their heads. You do not have a moral right to impose your views on other people's personal lives. It is quite fine if you insist on paid parental leave, it is also quite fine that people and employers come to arrangements about things that are important to them. It is not alright to use your vote as a cudgel to dictate the terms of other people's lives to better force them into your worldview.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 08:19 PM
1

Just by paying these people money though, the government is interfering in personal lives. When I was young, my parents were both employed and going for their LLMs. I didn't have a stay at home parent and my grandparents watched me a lot during that time. There all sorts of ways people and families take care of small children. Government mandated packages are not going to fit everyone's lives and are unfair. Plus, it seems like a solution to a problem that wasn't really there to begin with.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:34 AM
1

You could stop thinking that you have some right to work at someone else's restaurant. Other than that, write the papers or try to boycott i guess.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:24 AM
1

Nope, I am fine with William Blackstone's.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:43 PM
1

My mother kept her name, and me and my brother both got my father's name. I think this is more typical in families with different last names.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:05 AM
1

It is special treatment. When the state pays people just for being parents, it unfairly punishes people who don't have kids.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:24 PM
1

That is not something that one would reasonably assume to affect a potential partner's willingness to have sex. I would however like to mention that the last person I was with did mention that she had an implant above her left breast to help with her epilepsy. You can live in a world of condescending and self serving "should"s if you want to, but that does not change the veracity of what I am saying.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:52 AM
2

Heaven forbid a trans-person have a good time without telling everyone their life story. It is not just some irrelevant detail as you seem to suggest. There is no moral right to use someone to get off without their informed consent.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:16 AM
1

Only by your Franz Kafka logic am I a bigot. Furthermore, like I said, if someone was a bigot, you still do not have the right to make their sexual choices for them. I imagine this is not what you want to hear, because you look down on them and their choices, but is still their call.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:13 AM
1

You biologically cannot be unattracted to someone because of chromosomes or lack of ovaries. So glad to learn that strangers who have never met me know my most intimate thoughts.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:06 AM
1

Since when has that been a problem?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:41 PM
10

I am not claiming any problems. I am saying that it is not moral to deny someone their sexual autonomy, even if you happen to disagree with him, just because it is more convenient to your world view.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:07 PM
3

Due to the rarity of trans-women, there is a large and reasonable assumption that they were born as you see them now. Informed consent is important to these sort of things. As long as you can run around using mind reading and hyperbole to call out people as bigots(and lets pretend that is true, are bigots not entitled to make their own sexual choices?) I will go around saying that trans"women" who run around having sex with unaware partners are rapists.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:59 PM
2

Id have let them forfeit. Not a real win, but if they are just gonna pack up and go home might as well let them.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:07 PM
13

I don't owe anyone anything. I want to finish up college, find a job and work hard so I will be able to spend time with friends and family and pursue my interests. It is downright perverse to call on productive young people who are passionate about things to "grow up". If you are constantly crying and issuing demands at a group you have no claim on, I think you are the one who needs to grow up.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 01:38 AM
11

keep it all about equality under the law.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 07:42 PM
3

I want to ride my bicycle
/r/MensRights09/10/11 02:08 PM
2

It is discrimination, but he does not have the right to be in another person's bar.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:45 PM
2

Private property, they do what they want. The real question is why do your friends patronize such an openly bigoted establishment?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:44 PM
3

I am just pointing out that we don't need to speculate about women in combat as it has already happened. The communists fielded whole companies/battalions of women. Then in a warped version of the typical feminist narrative, they started to blow up shit and kill just like the men did. Our society does not care that much about men, or at any rate has come to accept the occasional pictures of c130s full of dead guys being flown back. As sad of a statement as it is, a plane full of dead women is wo…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:59 PM
3

The IDF integrated its combat units last year , and they still seem to be an effective fighting force. Hah, he calls what the IDF does combat.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:55 PM
6

The Russians used large numbers of women on the front lines. It takes very little physical ability to pull triggers. I say go for it, people might actually stop voting for warmongers once they see pics of dead women all over the news. Sad, but it seems like people care more that way.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 01:53 PM
4

or "tea party"
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:13 AM
-1

I am 12 years old what is this?
/r/MensRights29/09/11 11:08 PM
10

It is called the LGBT community for a reason, just not a very good one. The idea that all homosexuals and people who are not happy with their sex all agree with, support, and like each other is pretty dumb. It is based on a collectivist perspective with the maturity of a 3rd grader. She is not hating one of her own, there is nothing tying the two of them together.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:22 AM
-1

I anticipate some measure of backlash for this, but, if someone radically deviates from social norms in public spaces, they really should not be surprised when people treat them differently.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:49 AM
1

Don't tell homeowners to lock their doors, tell niggers not to steal!
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:51 PM
0

People who understand and believe in private property do not make a distinction between a bar and a home. Public does not mean "open to the public" but rather government. I never said it wasn't legal, just that it was not a morally legitimate use of government force.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:21 PM
0

In the sense that it outlawed government discrimination it is a good thing, equality before the law is a cornerstone of a free society. That however already existed with the equal protection clause, that unfortunately the courts were not very active in enforcing. To say however that you have the right, backed by threat of violence, to receive services from unwilling private individuals is morally indefensible.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:18 PM
2

It is wrong. People have a right to use their property as they see fit. There is not a right to go wherever the fuck you want and pay whatever the fuck you want.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 02:23 PM
4

Yes
/r/MensRights22/09/11 03:30 AM
5

It is private property, they serve you at their pleasure.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 12:31 AM
0

These "loud assholes" didn't co-opt it, they are the core of the movement.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:04 AM
-5

Not all social issues are equally important. I can hardly fathom what could lead you to that conclusion. The problem here is that as long as you identify as a feminist, you are aiding those who want to impose their bizzaro world gender relations on the rest of us by force. It would be better for me if every feminist was an Andrea Dworkin. Their success depends on people like you to popularize the movement. By identifying with these people you provide them with a camouflage with which they furthe…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 12:03 AM
-12

The only good feminist is a dead feminist
/r/MensRights17/09/11 11:36 PM
7

I don't owe her shit, because I don't shoot my mouth off like a dumb-ass at everything.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:34 PM
3

disconnect and disavow the child immediately. You don't want some "he acted as a father" bullshit putting you on the line for paydays.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 12:51 AM
3

o,O never going there.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:12 AM
0

The true men of Gor know the place of a woman. In seriousness though, I see this being thrown all over the place by our detractors. Hell, for all we know it was planted/up voted by them.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 01:39 AM
1

Not once you take into account that as an old feminist, she only sees(or cares about) the bad things that happen to women.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 06:45 AM
2

I do believe in a bare minimum of standards. As a principle however we should allow people to make their own decisions as long as they are not hurting other people.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 12:15 AM
5

Feminists have been screaming consent to sex =! consent to parenthood for 30+ years. Only when a man says it does it become something they oppose.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:21 PM
9

Call me whatever you want. I am worried about my income
/r/MensRights26/08/11 04:02 PM
3

Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. If a man consents to sex, but not to parenthood he should not be forced into it by the state.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 02:28 AM
3

Her body her choice. Her choice, her responsibility. If a woman goes forward with a pregnancy unilaterally, she is to be fully responsible for the child.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 07:44 PM
2

Only individuals have rights, not groups.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 05:37 PM
1

It is not in any way dumb. If people wanted paternity testing, they would all be getting it already. I would have any potential children of mine tested, but I do not presume to say what choices "no man" should take.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:03 AM
1

What is society? A bunch of individuals. If "society" wanted or needed this it would already be being done. You just want to make someone else's choice for them, because apparently family life is a matter for the government to preside over.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 12:35 AM
1

So 10 out of 50, if the mother's HIV status is unknown. That is an attempt, not even apparently a very widespread one at controlling the spread of an infectious disease. Totally different.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 12:29 AM
0

It is a private matter and it is not our place to mandate medical testing? I would insist on one, but if others don't I won't presume to make that choice for them.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 10:54 PM
2

Video makers must have really low opinions of women.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 09:05 AM
20

whites only
/r/MensRights17/08/11 11:35 PM
3

If it is all for the good of the innocent child, and men are always responsible no matter what, why don't we just randomly assign single mothers upper middle class baby daddies by lottery? Remember, the most important thing is to make sure the children are taken care of.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:03 AM
11

Interesting, but perhaps it is skewed by the fact that when one parent has custody it defaults to the mother unless the dad is clearly a better parent.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 02:39 AM
3

Lets not, we already have the equal protection clause. Feel good bullshit that is sure to be put to bad use.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 01:36 PM
-2

Feminism did not get women abortion rights(at least not in the US) the Supreme Court one day said it was constitutionally protected.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 03:10 AM
2

Actually, anonymity for neither would probably be better. I would want my name thrown all over the place, so if someone saw me or her elsewhere at the time they could come forward.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:32 PM
2

I don't reconcile the two. I dislike state based social engineering as a matter of principle.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 03:23 PM
1

Hard libertarian
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:17 PM
1

Women should have the choice, but if they proceed unilaterally they should be fully responsible for the child.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:37 PM
3

No, it should not be renewed at all. It is a overreaching reactionary law which defines abuse broadly enough to include many normal behaviors. It is also a state law enforcement issue that is none of the federal's business. Bad enough that men have had to deal with this crap, I wouldn't want to shaft the other half of the population as well.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:04 PM
1

Dude does not have a case. These are private business. see moose lodge v irvis
/r/MensRights17/07/11 11:27 PM
3

I wouldn't marry an unemployed woman.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 07:09 PM
1

I am most concerned with legal issues and genital mutilation. People can assign whatever cultural crap onto manhood they want. I can opt out and ignore that. As long as I am treated equally in the law I will be satisfied. Anything more than that is extra.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 09:12 PM
0

It prevents people coming forward who may have seen the accused elsewhere at the time and makes the trial less public. For this reason neither accused or accuser should have anonymity
/r/MensRights23/06/11 04:43 AM
3

It is inherently unequal, but we should strive for fairness. Men should be able to opt out of being a father. Her body, her choice, and if she insists on going through with it unilaterally, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 10:40 PM
4

male privilege is to be away from home, work your ass off, live in a society that does not give a shit about your pain, and to die years before your time.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 09:08 PM
2

I am worried about genital mutilation, legal system biases, and reproductive rights. Boys who wear dresses to school are frankly not a priority.
/r/MensRights19/06/11 08:44 AM
0

Actually that is wrong, at least in the US. Private discrimination is legal.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:58 PM
-1

Frivolous lawsuit. As long as it is clearly posted private businesses should be allowed to make their own policies. Don't like it? Go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 06:05 AM
0

Sorry, but sexist as it is, most women who go into best buy are clueless. It is a pretty reasonable assumption.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 09:20 PM
0

So when men have an advantage it is male privilege, and when women have an advantage it is just further evidence of their victim hood? Also this "chivalry" stuff as they call it is pretty much made up. Chivalry was a warrior code and most of it applied to how men of certain classes treated other men of those classes. Chivalry only applied to a rather small group of women, and even then, that was not the focus of it. If a girl ever says shit about Chivalry ask her how much her family owns. If it …
/r/MensRights15/06/11 07:16 PM
1

end the wars, the department of homeland security, department of education, cut federal spending back to what it was 10 years ago. mr related? I would make fatherhood an opt in/opt out system, get rid of the ridiculous requirement that colleges deal with sexual assaults(clearly a criminal matter) and cut down all affirmative action programs.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 03:17 PM
2

I think the problem in this case is that a man would be punished for it, not that the woman wasn't. 17 year olds are capable of making decisions about what they want to do sexually.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 05:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter