TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NickWalker12 Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by NickWalker12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Unfortunately it won't help - any woman will tell you that just 1 creep on a train can act in an explicitly creepy way towards you, even if alone, and even if surrounded by women. As much as some men hate these carriages - they clearly seem to be working.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 02:17 PM
1

It amazes me how these arguments stand perfectly fine if you want to defend segregation. The point about segregation is that it's only justified if you can justify it. I'm confident that modern "white vs black" racism (for example) is entirely unjustified. Look, no one wants their female relatives assaulted and abused, this argument is simply ridiculous because it tries to reach into feelings and not reasoning. No, I'm simply predicting what would happen if you banned women only carriages in ver…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 06:13 AM
0

I don't see how you're any different by just madlibbing a different demographic group into the same rhetoric. As said, it's about degrees. Do you think that means: A) 64% of all men are one-time gropers Or B) few gropers tend to victimize multiple people Obviously much closer to B. What's your point? 71% of infanticide is perpetrated by women. You misread my point. I said that that if 64% of ALL babies born were being killed (and killed almost exclusively by female nurses), we'd ban female nurse…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 05:48 AM
3

Because """Keep the black people off of the white-only trains because they're more violent. It's simple safety. It's not our fault us white folks are scared of them, the vast majority of perpetrators are black. """ Except this would be untrue, and thus racist discrimination. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/10/japan.justinmccurry "A recent survey found that as many as 64% of women in their 20s and 30s had been groped on overland and underground trains in Tokyo." Train-carriage groping …
/r/MensRights06/10/23 01:35 AM
2

You're trying to lecture people who are 5x more likely to be victims of violence than you are...about how you're more afraid of violence than they are. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/10/japan.justinmccurry "A recent survey found that as many as 64% of women in their 20s and 30s had been groped on overland and underground trains in Tokyo." Pretty sure women get groped in some of these areas far more often than men get assaulted. by blaming the victims for sharing an arbitrary feature …
/r/MensRights06/10/23 01:17 AM
-1

I don't want to segregate men either. I understand the principles you're trying to defend here, but this 'unwavering' stance has obvious and predictable implications that I'm not going to just let you side-step. Not for you, but for your daughters, wife, girlfriend, sisters, mother, aunts, female friends & colleagues etc. How many sexual assaults are you willing to enable by voting this kind of policy down? Because you find it personally offensive. ​ I empathize with women who are actually assau…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:24 PM
5

What? Just answer my question.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:13 PM
0

I'm trying to make you empathise with the women who demanded women-only carriages. Do you think they did it for no reason? Or out of a superiority complex? Or because sexual assault is a genuine & massive problem? The problem with some people is that the most important thing for them is to see what is hanging between their legs. Yes, for the men who grope women on trains, the sex of the victim is the entire point. You have them to thank for the resulting reactive policy.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:19 PM
5

Would you get on a train if one person in one hundred would sexually grope you? If every train you got on has a groper? Even every other train? Every 10th would be once a week, assuming twice per workday.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:48 PM
-12

Why do you assume that these women think they're superior? It's simple safety: How many times would you be groped by a woman on a train before you began to demand men-only carriages? It's not all men, obviously, but the vast majority of perpetrators are men. I understand that you hate to be stereotyped, and you hate that women get scared of you. But that is the reality of living as a woman in some of these places. If we - as a society - find a way to dramatically reduce instances of sexual assau…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:46 PM
-3

You cropped the rest of the paragraph, which explains that the term was coined by a feminist who disagrees with it. Feminists are not a monolith. And speaking of today's political landscape, you're better off with the self described feminists than the far right Conservative & Republican parties.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 06:19 PM
-1

Lol, anything to be oppressed, hey? Even when receiving a lighter prison sentence for horrible crimes. Where did I cry oppression? Current feminism would not say such things, All I'm trying to do is: 1. Remind you that millions of women support men's rights causes - and those women are liberal & left leaning. 2. Ask for evidence when there is a claim made that this is part of the feminist agenda. You need to leave this sub. Or be banned. This is MENS RIGHTS not SUPPORT MADE UP FEMINIST IDEOLOGIE…
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:55 PM
-17

Sexist, yes. NOT feminist. That's MY argument. This video explains the prison sentencing laws in the U.K. : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqA8N74LNDE Thanks for the link. A report identifying that it is cheaper to rehabilitate women than send them to prison is not sexist, though. It's not saying men CAN'T BE rehabilitated, it's simply not addressing men at all. We have a lot of gender specific research, especially as it relates to gender specific institutions (like prison). I'm also firmly in …
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:48 PM
-23

Your comments made me curious, so I did some digging: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0093854814560624 This concludes that "yes and no", re women having harsher sentences. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15564886.2021.1947427 This also concludes "yes and no".
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:10 PM
-30

Why do you assume the judge is a feminist? It's most likely the opposite: This is old fashioned sexism, where women are seen as weak and non-threatening, and boys (even boys as young as 13) are presumed to always want sex. A feminist would identify this as paedophilia and child molestation. Similarly: In UK law, a (cis) woman can't legally rape a man, because rape is defined as 'penetrating with a penis'. It's abhorrent. Feminists speak out about this double standard all the time.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:55 PM
1

You need to do more research on that 1 in 4 stat. Not all rape is this hyper aggressive thing you're imagining. It can include coercion, deliberate intoxication, starting to grope someone then continuing after being told no etc. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html I'm fairly certain that everyone who has had regular sex - both male and female - will have a story where their partner had to convince them to have sex. And/Or where they wanted to stop, but felt pressu…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:05 AM
3

Japan's problem with "upskirting" was so bad that they passed a law requiring all photos taken on phones play a loud camera shutter sound, even if the phone is muted. Women-only carriages solves a specific problem. If men are being groped (or having their underwear photographed), then they can also ask for men-only carriages.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 10:51 AM
1

I asked for examples of "boys are now expected to act like girls or else they are punished/medicated", I never disagreed with you that men and women have (a few) minor mental and temperament differences. Interestingly, the sources you linked talk about how tiny and insignificant these detected differences are between boys and girls, especially in the Western world, which was my other major point. Example: Linked from your first link: Fine motor control is more heavily correlated by age, than gen…
/r/MensRights10/09/23 04:41 PM
2

What does toxic masculinity have to do with ADHD diagnosis??? Christ, just read a tiny bit of actually feminist literature, and you might realize that feminists are some of the few people who admit that men have it worse than women in many ways. And do you have literally any sources for any of this superstitious nonsense? Where is the fucking integrity in this subreddit? I thought men were supposed to be the logical ones?
/r/MensRights04/09/23 08:36 AM
1

Ah, you're so above being lightly challenged on your beliefs, but you ain't above bitching and whining about the feminism boogyman. Gotcha 👍
/r/MensRights04/09/23 08:28 AM
1

JFC, so show me one, rather than dancing around the point.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 06:22 AM
2

LOL. Simply claiming someone is wrong is not an argument. I would have assumed you knew that. You have a good argument when you claim that 11.7% of boys are diagnosed with ADHD. You have absolutely nothing when you claim it's due to feminism.
/r/MensRights04/09/23 06:19 AM
-2

What does this have to do with boys being treated like defective girls? Couldn't it just be: Boys are treated poorly? (which I wouldn't disagree with)
/r/MensRights04/09/23 03:30 AM
-4

There is this insane tendency to try to equate boys and girls as though they are biologically the same. Boys and girls are near identical across all metrics. I.e. It's harder to find gendered differences, than similarities. boys are now expected to act like girls or else they are punished/medicated I hear the MensRights advocates talk about this idea ad nauseum, but can you give me one just example of this occurring?
/r/MensRights03/09/23 08:26 PM
-1

For the record: The feminist solution is NOT to "resort to drugs". That is insane. It would be to listen to them, empathise with them, and try to understand what is causing the distress (and then to solve said distress). Arguably, "toxic masculinity" is the reason why these boys don't even want to open up. Because they are worried that their peers will see them as "gay" or "weak". ​ So [boys] are not supposed to be rambunctious and hard to control. Why do you insist upon making this gendered? Gi…
/r/MensRights03/09/23 05:53 PM
0

Bro I literally agreed with you. But I also pointed out that if you're born in any western country, you're more likely to die giving birth to your child than via conscription. That is a fact. I'm sorry that "men get conscripted" isn't a compelling unfairness argument (unless you live in Ukraine or Russia). If you think it is, advocate for a change in laws so that conscription ends (and/or women get conscripted too). Can I untrigger you if I list all the ways that men have it worse? Jfc.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:30 PM
-1

Abortion is a solution for: - Accidental pregnancy. - Life threatening complications in pregnancy. - Non viable foetuses. Also, no form of birth control is 100% effective, and I do think society should do a much better job educating teens on contraceptive options. The good news for men is that non-intruisive male birth control will soon be widely available. It's going to do wonders for mens rights regarding sex (and autonomy over conception).
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:26 PM
0

Men tend to regulate through actions rather than words like women do. You don't have any evidence to suggest that this is biological (rather than learned behaviour). I've seen incredibly docile men, and incredibly violent and aggressive women. Maybe all of the gendered differences are due to how society raises boys? Which means that yes, we can raise them the same. Example hypothesis: Maybe girls are notoriously "catty" (i.e. verbally aggressive) towards each other because we don't let them be p…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:19 PM
1

It's not victim blaming. Men who get lied to (and baby trapped) are clearly victims, but that doesn't mean men in general are helpless. E.g. Women who got raped after getting blackout drunk at a party are victims, but we can still suggest that women - in general - shouldn't get blackout drunk in places where they don't know (nor trust) the men there. I'm talking about precautions, I'm not saying you're not victims. So yes, I am saying that you should establish trust with any woman that you cum i…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:59 PM
1

Not necessarily. E.g. Some US states still have 'Fired without Cause' rights. It'll be almost impossible to prove discrimination there. And even if I have to, I can just find tiny details to attack you on. "You were late 10 times this month." "You were rude to customers." "Your work was tardy." Etc.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:35 PM
1

I agree with you entirely on all of these points. Male victims of sex crimes are very often overlooked. E.g. Here in the UK, someone apparently must have a penis to rape someone else. Thus women cannot be "rapists". It's a barbaric assumption. The problem is: How do you make the non-victim men care about this enough to fight for it politically? Does this subreddit organize political campaigns to try to change laws in different states?
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:32 PM
1

You pivoted so hard I got whiplash lol. Regarding conscription: I agree it's horrific, but: 1. It's exceptionally rare. 2. Women get badly harmed (and often killed) in war too. 3. Every year, in every country, more women die in childbirth in civil society, than men die from conscription.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:14 AM
1

You mean the post where the man said that what women want is contradictory a.k.a. irrational? You're so right, it is rude and intellectually dishonest! I was simply flipping the argument around. My point still stands: Everyone is emotional, men included. To actually debunk it: Women are not a monolith. Some women have conservative values, others are more modern. Some women end up mixing values of the two. I.e. Exactly what men do. Cheers.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:54 AM
1

Men and boys regulate their emotions differently from women and girls. If you teach a boy to regulate like a girl he is going to be ill equipped to deal with his emotions. Source? And source for violence by proxy? Yea no, I don't think that's the case. You might want to pick your words better. You literally changed my words, bro. Cocky and confident women are extremely attractive. I'll defend every word I said. No, I think teaching them the same as women is a solution that assumes they are defec…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:49 AM
-2

Your assumption that this hurt my feelings was wrong. It was sexist to assume, though. Link the source. The obvious problem with this kind of claim is: Are men biologically more logical, or is this due to how we raise boys Vs girls? I.e. What percentage is this due to nurture? Similarly, even if men are on average more logical than women, it doesn't resolve the point I made, for the following reasons: 1. By what percentage are men more logical? 2. How much does that actually impact a womans abil…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:17 AM
-1

This sub is incredibly toxic. It worries me that you can't see the toxicity, honestly. Why did you just assume I read a specific subreddit, then try to use that against me? That's not logical. And what is FDS? EDIT: I can't reply for some reason. This sub is toxic for a few reasons: - You blame a lot of your problems on women, even when said women would agree with you. - I've been on this sub for one day and already had 3 different people act overtly sexist. Even for Reddit, that's insane. - Alm…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:08 AM
-2

Source on that proof? Because you're claiming that platitudes are fact currently, which isn't logical. Edit: He posted a huffpost opinion piece. Seems like academics believe there is no marked difference in general intelligence between men and women, but there may be differences in subcategories. wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_intelligence
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:06 AM
-3

Reported for blatant racism. You're implying that I'm those things based on my skin colour and my ancestors.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 05:04 AM
-4

You got so triggered by identity politics that you forgot to actually address my point, which was ONLY that men can choose who they sleep with (so deserve all the responsibility that lands on them when they accidentally make a baby). Edit: Also, the casual sexism dripping from your post proves that feminists have a point.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:40 AM
-1

The case of David Raimer is clear evidence that boys and girls are psychologically different. You can't just treat them like girls, it doesn't work. I can't tell if you're trolling. If not, the difference is: telling a boy that he is literally a girl is child abuse. Raising sons the same as daughters - in terms of emotional self regulation, tolerance of violence, and encouraging expression - is very normal and fine. In other words: Healthy boys are as emotionally intelligent - and empathetic - a…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:33 AM
-1

Do you honestly think that I'm advocating for Raimer-esque child abuse? You're so jaded bro. Let's be honest: Men are not taught how to communicate well with each other. Women report far more satisfaction being single, likely because they have emotional needs met by better friendships. I'm not saying men should wear dresses, I'm saying men should NOT feel massive shame, insecuity, and awkwardness at asking for help and/or physical comfort. EDIT: Also, if you don't like my solution, what's yours?…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:02 AM
-3

You choose who you sleep with. You choose whether or not you wear protection. You choose whether or not you have a conversation about abortion before you impregnate her. Life advice: 1. Ask every girl you're about to have sex with about her views on abortion BEFOREHAND. Ask her if she's sure. Ask her if she'll change her mind once she's actually pregnant. If having this conversation makes you uncomfortable, you're not ready to have sex yet, period. 2. If you don't trust her - then your an idiot …
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:19 AM
-5

We fuck up boys when we raise them to be cold, detached, hyper masculine stoics (I.e. toxic masculinity). We fuck up girls when we teach them to be aggreeable and meak (toxic femininity). Boys need to be taught how to communicate better (like girls are). It might actually help alleviate the epidemic of male suicide. My advice: Healthy stoicism isn't a choice you make WHEN you are feeling emotions, it is the result of healthy mechanisms of dealing with said emotion (e.g. via good, non-judgemental…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:57 AM
1

This is incredibly naïve, because you can't win in court just by claiming someone discriminated against you based on gender. Have you considered that? It's like being a victim of rape: The burden of proof is much higher than "he said, she said", which is why rapists rarely go to prison in real life (leading to more rape, as those few bad apples don't get removed from society, leading to more women hating men). Example: If I fire you for being male, how do you prove it? I'll just say you didn't p…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:43 AM
1

I've listed some reasons below, but remember that society can be both systematically misogynistic AND systemically misandrist at the same time. Both sexes have problems in society. There are many jobs that a lot of people (including other women) still think women cannot do. E.g. Ask any teenage girl if she's ever been (unironically) offered a tradie or construction internship by family & friends. Or look at how many parents will buy a games console for the boys, but not the girls. Or look at any…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:37 AM
0

Nah it don't. That's a recent, insecurity-driven stupidity. Marriages are partnerships. Both of you have control over each others lives. You share the big responsibilities and decisions. You communicate, and come to big conclusions together. Example: You might find someone who wants you to manage the shared finances, but you'll likely never find anyone who wants YOU to control THEIR finances. It'd be a major red flag if they did.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:12 AM
-6

Who doesn't like life on their own terms? And yes, that is literally how it works (and it's okay). Stop focusing on what you think women want. What do YOU want in a partner? Search for that.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:05 AM
-3

Everything you're saying right now is driven by your emotions. Anger is an emotion, and men are frequently angry. The reality is that everyone can be emotional, and that's okay. It's human nature. Practical advice: Google how to recognise those moments where you're being driven by emotion. Learn acceptance for who you are today (rather than focusing on who you want to be), and most importantly: Work to heal any gendered jadedness. It's very hard to find a girlfriend if women trigger you.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 01:04 AM
-1

It's important to remember that women aren't a single demographic. I.e. Some women want to stay at home while the man provides, other women will literally swoon at seeing a man playing with a baby. You should NEVER make decisions about your life based on what you THINK women want. This subreddit is full of very toxic ideas about both masculinity and femininity. Authenticity is attractive, and most importantly, it'll attract the kind of woman who loves you for who you are (rather than who you pre…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:59 AM
0

You are so wrong with your assessment that it's beyond parody. The director INTENTIONALLY depicted Alice as feeling completely helpless, because that's what victims of domestic abuse are actually like, in reality. Do you genuinely have so little empathy that you didn't even realize that it was incredibly hard for the protagonist to open up about her DV situation? JFC read up on what abuse does to a person, because the entire film seemed to go right over your heads (ironically proving how necessa…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:38 AM
0

What responsibility didn't the protagonist - Alice - accept? Or are you just mad that the film showed a fairly obviously black and white realistic depiction of male on female domestic abuse here? Hot take: If a movie was made today depicting realistic female on male domestic abuse: - Most men would mock the protagonist for being weak and feminine. - It would automatically win awards in Hollywood because Hollywood is left leaning, and progressive lefties (i.e. feminists) appreciate and respect th…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:32 AM
1

I am baffled that people in this thread can misunderstand a movie so badly. It's not about "female empowerment", it's a story depicting what domestic abuse looks like - in reality - from the POV of a victim. I.e. It depicts; why they feel so helpless, the harm they continue to commit on themselves (pulling out hair, disordered eating, self loathing etc), and the difficulty that even well meaning friends have in supporting them (as it requires overstepping normal adult boundaries). It is exceptio…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter