TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NicodemusV Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by NicodemusV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

If misandry is a “valid prejudice,” then some prejudices must be valid at some points in time. Nietzsche, again
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 08:15 PM
1

No. Someone who agrees with Lindsay Graham is more likely to be a conservative. They don’t “become” more masculine. But generally, being conservative is associated with masculinity. Are liberal men more successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 08:13 PM
4

Most average people don’t deep dive into political philosophy and care enough to understand what a coherent political philosophy is. Democrats and Republicans appeal to the greatest common denominator, and on this level, are a fair proxy for liberal or conservative ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 07:32 PM
2

The post describes a man asking for explicit consent which should remove grey areas. Isn’t verbal communication the most explicit form of consent? Why do you think there is no gray areas?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:10 AM
2

Was he coercing her or do you think the women were raising a valid point
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:08 AM
1

What do you mean by “feminine energy?” Why does it include being carefree? I agree that one partner generally must be more willing to sacrifice and be the “bigger person” in the relationship by absorbing more of the other’s negative energy. Someone must also be the stable person, who is more incentivized to invest in the relationship, whether out of desperation or necessity or whatever reason. There are always imbalances between two people, whether in emotions, or communication, or finances, or …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 10:16 AM
13

Goes straight to making up a strawman about OP’s argument, like clockwork
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:11 PM
4

Again, you have made up an entirely new tangent. Dating dynamics in 2026 are different than in 1984. That’s actual reality, without your rose-tinted glasses. Feel free to elaborate in better detail on any one of your many positions you’ve made up thus far. You haven’t defended your made-up condition either. Argument: dating dynamics do not have to be “women indiscriminately chasing men and men rejecting them” in order for dating dynamics to have changed. Either way, you’re telling on yourself th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:44 AM
5

Being wishy washy and vague about your words doesn’t make your argument any better
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:32 AM
5

No, that’s just a subjective, made-up condition that you made up as a goalpost in order to deny that dating has “drastically” changed. Argument: dating does not have to be women chasing men indiscriminately and men rejecting them in order for dating culture to have changed. Dating culture has so obviously changed. Your burden of proof that it has not is higher than mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:47 AM

you think feminism fundamentally means collective guilt toward men You either have not read or do not comprehend Patriarchy theory
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:42 AM
7

Did women vote to make you their spokesperson?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:11 AM
8

Are you arguing dating in 2026 is the same as in 1984 …you’d have a point Women chasing men indiscriminately and men rejecting them is a strawman condition you made up that wasn’t argued
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:08 AM
1

Where was lust named as the only valid form of wanting someone
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:03 AM

I didn’t ask whether men state their preferences or not — I asked whether you think theirs are shamed to the same extent as women’s. Anyways It sounds like you agree, since you understand men actually do care about things like N-count, weight and obesity, and looks. They just may not reveal their preferences about those traits honestly or openly, and put up a public front about them, so how does that square with your “blue pill”? Your projection of a just-world isn’t making sense when it comes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:24 AM

Your rhetoric makes no sense, because you’ve already derailed the OP. You’re simply showing your deliberate obtuseness by furthering your tangent with these questions. Do you think men’s preferences and standards are shamed to the same extent as women’s? Frankly, your answers to your own questions are outdated and don’t apply to most women. Women are encouraged to leave their relationships and pursue liberation. Women are encouraged to pursue their sexual liberation — you can call it “societal p…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:51 AM

I love how when it comes to men, it’s all individual blaming and we completely forget the societal context that men exist in that you have to be this deliberately obtuse in order to make a point against men, so you make up a completely different point that OP isn’t arguing and you argue that instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 11:28 PM
1

Most men are in relationships, you’re talking about a subset of a younger crowd. The loneliness epidemic is about overall friendships and relationships, not necessarily only romantic ones. Do you know what you’re talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:06 PM

Men are dumb for learning the winning strategies proven to work for most guys
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:49 PM
6

Yea, you are talking about a major statistical population, 27-33% of all women in America have ever used a dating app, and it will probably continue to trend upward. To argue this population has no bearing or influence on the rest of women is bias
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:30 PM
6

The vast majority of women 18-25 are on dating apps, social media, and other ways to meet up and hook up online, they represent a significant sample size of the women population. How many women do you know have used a dating app? I think your view is outdated. How old are you? Online reflects real life more and more because more and more of life is being lived online, and more and more of life is being influenced by online Internet culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:08 PM
15

Women online are real, valid women. You don’t get to discount them or treat them as some alien that has no bearing on the rest of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:56 PM
8

Do you have any counter arguments or some commentary on the methodology? So far you just have anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:51 PM

You don’t need to go to clubs to have a casual sex lifestyle
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 06:33 PM
1

Holy shit, open a history book
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:27 PM
0

Lol, you call it that way because this is a post about advice addressed to men. When I speak to women about this exact same thing, they don’t think of the behavior OP is describing as “gamify it (approaching for conversation) for the sake of “assessing.” Again, it’s not gamifying the interaction to remove the prejudice that beauty brings into people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:45 AM
1

It isn’t ideology. Removing your bias about a person’s looks before you interact with them isn’t ideology. This is another projection. It isn’t about making them feel less than you — it’s about removing that initial reaction to how they look when you engage in the conversation. All the things you’re bringing up, are after the conversation is over. Rejection? The OP point is not to think of this mindset as a shield against rejection or whatever outcome. Thinking it is a coping method for rejectio…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:16 AM
1

It is very powerful you are just in denial of it being a powerful mindset to have likely because you are projecting your “gamifying” thoughts onto it. OP didn’t say that attraction is not ok, either, so you just made that up. It is not “lieing” to yourself that you didn’t feel attraction, it is understanding that a woman’s beauty is literally nothing special and beautiful women are a dime a dozen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:48 AM
3

It’s not saying that a powerful mindset is needed, it’s just saying that this is a powerful mindset to have. There’s a difference. The message was not about “maintaining the upper hand at something,” OP was talking about stripping away the effect that women’s beauty has on a man and seeing her for her own self. Beauty is cheap and can easily be faked. Successful men aren’t distracted by beauty and directly check the woman’s character through conversation. A pretty face can hide a shallow persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:34 AM
4

AFBB - alpha fucks, beta bucks. This refers to how women will have a man, who is not necessarily the ideal relationship partner, but is sexually attractive to her and otherwise allows this person to get away with certain behaviors. They would, either concurrently or after the fact, have another man who isn’t as sexually appealing or dominant, but provides for her needs while also being limited in what behaviors he can get away with.
/r/BlackPillScience09/07/24 10:19 PM
4

No need to lie about your body count unless you’re ashamed of it.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 10:18 AM
1

Ground crewman stole an empty plane, took off, had fun with it, and when he was done he nosed down and called it a night. Didn’t want to land it cause he thought he might hurt someone. Wanted to know the coordinates of J35 so that he could see the mother orca pushing her dead calf. Did a loop-de-loop and a barrel roll. Honestly, I think the man just wanted a shot in the cockpit. He wondered if the airline he worked for would give him a flying job after the whole thing, and he sounded very noncha…
/r/MGTOW06/09/18 04:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter