TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NightmareFiction Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by NightmareFiction on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Could you give a little more insight on precisely what it is that's going on? Why is she being abusive? Additionally, give some examples of what it is that she's doing/says when she's having an episode? Did this just start or has it always been going on? And how old are you two? If you want to work on this, you need to start putting your foot down. She needs to understand just how serious you are about leaving her if she doesn't get her act together. And I mean sit her down and tell her flat out…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:07 AM
7

This is the only way this issue can work out fairly with the technology we have. If a woman wants to have an abortion, but the man does not, there isn't really a whole lot the guy can do in this situation. You can't force the woman to "care" for a child against her will because that's honestly just silly. On the flip side, if the woman wants to keep the child and the man does not, forcing the man to "care" for the child against his will is equally preposterous. And yet, one of these situations i…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:14 AM
1

We're used to feminists saying that male = evil. This is feminists saying the reverse, that evil = male. Anything bad (from their point of view) means it's men doing it. This is the problem with patriarchy theory from an inclusion standpoint and why so many man-haters find haven in the feminists movement. It's the blanket assumption that things that are negative in our "patriarchal society" are inherently the fault of men (because we're "in power"), while disregarding the positive or attributing…
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:36 PM
1

Thank you for actually answering the question. I did not know Phimosis was rare, nor did I know that there's a higher chance of of complications than Phimosis itself.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:51 AM
1

My point wasn't "what about medical necessity" at all though. What I'm trying to gather is: completely ignoring moral justifications, what is the negative impact of circumcision? Is it only morally wrong or is there medical/scientific reasoning for why it shouldn't be done? Are medical complications/disfigurement common? I'm basing this question on the assumption that performing a circumcision is less dangerous/serious at infancy than it is later in life, so if that assumption is not correct, pl…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 06:20 PM
-2

Let me first state that I am circumcised, and admittedly don't care about this subject matter at all (I honestly don't think it's a big deal in the grand scheme of things). With that said, I read your response to why circumcision is bad (because I wanted to know why people care about it so much), but I feel like you may be too close to this subject to provide an objective critique. For example, you completely neglected what IMO is a very viable reason for circumcision: Phimosis (the leading caus…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:26 PM
2

I'm not following this part: if you and your spouse are fighting for custody (this scenario assumes two things: 1) that one or both don't want the other to have full custody or shared custody, and 2) that the ultimate end goal for the father is to have some form of custody for the child), why would the mother have any incentive to change her tactics if the father willingly decides to stop fighting? She got what she wanted (full custody or shared custody) and the father did not (full custody or s…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:33 PM
3

When the second host said "I was worried that men would hear you say that and think they have a free pass to attack women" and then NOBODY called her out on that incredibly sexist notion, I got a little disappointed. Is that legitimately what this women assumes the natural progression is of men being able to defend themselves? That men are just biding their time until they can start punching random women on the street or something? Baby steps, I guess.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:38 PM
3

How can any rational individual watch the events in this kid's life, see how people treat him when in response to them, and then NOT understand how he'd grow up to be physically abusive and emotional distant. This kid was practically groomed to be a sociopath. I understand it's supposed to be a dramatization, but holy hell. The dissonance makes my brain hurt.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:18 AM
39

I don't understand what this is supposed to accomplish. The article mentions the school having an issue with sexual assault allegations against the fraternities and its' members. How is allowing women into these fraternities supposed to fix that? Are they expecting the female members to police the behavior for them?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:00 PM
3

Thank you! One of my main gripes with this subreddit is how seemingly preoccupied we are with calling out and tearing down Feminism, as opposed to actual activism. We have a valid movement with the potential to do some real good, and we are squandering that potential by continuously getting into needless pissing matches with people who will never change their minds. It's completely backwards and counterproductive to the movement.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:06 PM
1

So if I'm understanding you correctly, our fundamental disagree is whether or not cause-and-effect applies? Then we can simply agree to disagree then. No, X does not automatically equal Y in every scenario, but to claim that that the former has absolutely zero impact on the latter in every scenario is just willful ignorance IMO.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:59 PM
-1

Quite the opposite, I was actually bullied as a child. However, I do not for a second believe I didn't have a role to play in that. I was skinny and shy as a kid, and I was bullied for that reason (people saw me as weak and unable to defend myself). I would tell on these kids, they'd get in trouble, then be right back at it again. So with that in mind, I asked my older brother to teach me how to properly throw a punch so I wouldn't actually be defenseless. Ended up knocking my bully's tooth out …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:21 PM
2

I feel like you're missing my point. I'm not saying that it's this kid's fault for being bullied. Quite the opposite, actually. This kid admitted to understanding that he was likely to be bullied for having that lunchbox, yet he brought it anyway. He knew the risks and decided the benefits outweighed them in his opinion. No, it's not completely his fault he was bullied and the perpetrators should indeed be punished. However, I disagree with the idea of willfully ignoring the fact that this kid k…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:11 PM
2

I agree, but I'm grounded enough to understand that the world simply doesn't work that way. And with that in mind, we should be teaching our kids how to function in the world as it is, not how we think it should be.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:07 PM
-15

First of all, if as a boy you bring a MLP lunchbox to school, you're asking for trouble. That's simply how the playground tends to work. Bullies will find something to pick on people for, and going against what are considered the social norms for that age makes you a prime target. It's funny that his mother used the "short skirt = rape" example, as that too follows the same concept. No, wearing a short skirt or taking an MLP lunchbox to school is not an open invitation to abuse, but it makes you…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:41 PM
9

The tone of the rhetoric on this 'men's rights' subreddit may go some way to explain why you aren't getting much sympathy from feminists...It's a bit hostile...All seems a bit Israel and Palestine to me- if what we want is a fair and just society, we (ie those who support women's rights and those who support men's rights,) need to see ourselves as one group and move forward. Unfortunately, you're seeing the aftermath of the "co-op initiative" between the MRAs and Feminists of Reddit. The short v…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:24 AM
6

Forgive my ignorance, is Fathers4Justice fighting against all children not living with both parents or children without their father due to the actions of their mother (ie forcibly keeping them from each other)?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:33 PM
5

Ok, and the proof that it isn't false is where?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:29 PM
5

But can you prove it's true?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:26 PM
2

The ad paints her in a negative light. People will read the bolded text and assume she is willfully keeping her children away from their fathers.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:25 PM
3

But that's the thing, this could easily be seen as slander in the eyes of the law. People will see that ad and think she's forcibly keeping her children from their fathers, but is that definitively the case? Is there proof somewhere that her children are being kept from their fathers against their will? If this woman was holding the man's child hostage, why would he be defending her?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:10 PM
2

I disagree with the statement that "men have no similar standards women must fulfill", but I agree with your overall point. There are definitely standards, however I feel the difference between men and women is that the former are more inclined to negotiating (for lack of a better word). I believe this is due to the idea of "soul mates", a fantasy that is fed to specifically women from a very young age. The idea that women each have a specific Prince Charming out in the world somewhere that is p…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:49 AM
2

What? Generically speaking, women spend ridiculous amounts of time and money in order to be what Barbie physically represents (she's pretty and she's thin). It's plastered over every magazine, book, television show, etc that's aimed at them. Women want to be like Barbie and men want to sleep with women like Barbie. How is that different?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:47 PM
9

I don't understand how this is anymore sexists than a woman proclaiming it's "her kitchen".
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:57 PM
4

Here's the thing though: you can't reason with someone in her state, the threat or actually calling the police probably wouldn't have made her leave. Meaning they would've had to wait for police to get there all while she's hanging out on their balcony; lord knows what could happen in between then. I'm all for letting the authority's do their job, but it wasn't necessary here. They took the best course of action to remove her from their property IMO.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:14 AM
1

The argument comes from the fact that focussing on punishing false rape reporters creates an environment where victims of rape are less likely to come forward less they be labled a false accuser. Source? The advocacy of punishment for false rape accusations is wholly about stopping people from abusing our legal system and society's sensitivity of the subject for personal gain.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 09:32 PM
3

How exactly is rape being downplayed in our society? As far as I can tell, people tend to get crucified from the mere accusation of a rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 04:56 PM
9

Here ya go
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:59 PM
3

What the... Did she just make those subreddits up on the spot?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:40 PM
12

First off, you handled this entire situation in like the absolutely worst way humanly possible. If you're accused of a crime, especially rape or something else with a woman as the victim, the LAST (and I do mean the absolutely last) thing you want to do is confront them. You'll get nothing out of it and the way you openly acted like a jackass in public (shouting at her and everyone around you), you're lucky you only escaped that encounter with the injuries that you did. And now, your whole show …
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:11 PM
9

there are news stories of nine year old boys going to jail on sexual harassment charges. Why? Because he said his teacher was cute. ..wut?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:22 AM
1

Way to completely miss the point there, champ. =\
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:38 AM
3

If the military conducted itself in the same way your average joe walking down the street does, would you honestly trust them to keep you and your home safe? They don't act as a moral beacon for their own sake, they do it to give the general populace the peace of mind that if shit ever hits the fan, we don't have a bunch of drunkards, rapists, and thieves as our last line of defense.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:32 PM
1

You're assuming he's only going up against a bunch of teenage girls when his school administration is allowing a club dedicated to feminism is a fundamental flaw in your logic IMO. If this guy pisses off the wrong girl, I could easily see her convincing some white knight to take up arms.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:42 AM
3

You don't want to be tackling this sort of thing by yourself, and it's good to hear that you've got a support system in case there's any backlash. A candle is easy to quietly snuff out. A forest fire is impossible to extinguish without someone noticing though.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:47 PM
23

I'm not going to say what boradin suggested is right, but it's ridiculously easy for us, who have zero connection to this kid or any of his opponents, to potentially mess his life up. We can't see nor are we effected by the proverbial "dragons" we're sending him out to slay. If this goes south, we'll say "another soldier for the cause lost" and go about our merry lives. This could go one of about 3 ways: he could stand up and actually make a change (remember, his opponent is a feminist-controlle…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:06 PM
3

The same reason male rape victims are not considered victims: "men crave sexual contact, so all sexual contact is wanted on some level". Who is this girl to you? Your girlfriend? Wife? Some casual acquaintance from school?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:42 PM
1

It likely went unnoticed not only because of the way the scene leading up to and after the "rape" took place. She told him outright that what he was about to drink was poison, and he drank it anyway. And after the fight, he didn't seem at all phased by the fact that she was having sex with him. He went on to deliver a speech, after all. Now, I'm not saying that the way male rape victims are often depicted is ok, but this particular instance feels like we're digging for something that isn't there…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:07 AM
23

How can they ask for equality in job opportunities and then in the very next breath turn down the jobs they get because they're "male jobs"? They should be jumping at the chance to do things like construction specifically because it's a boy's club. What I essentially read this is as was "I don't want to do construction, it's icky. I wanna be a be a doctor; make some doctor jobs". Why is this sort of logic not openly ridiculed? >:x
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:15 PM
1

Yup. It's not until you bring drugs into the equation that people start to think outside that "how did she overpower him" box.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:53 AM
373

Ugh, I never understood that question. Men do not have absolute control over their erections, the body will do what it wants (any guy can attest to random boners out of nowhere). Whether a guy is aroused or not, it's not that difficult to "force" him to have an erection. EDIT: For the record, I'm well aware that sodomy is also a way one could rape a male. The reason I didn't mention it specifically is because it's not typically the fuel behind this question (in my experience, at least).
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:33 PM
1

Legally, a person cannot give consent if their judgment is impaired, and alcohol (even a small amount by normal drinking standards) impairs judgment. It's based on a case-by-case basis, but if one of the parties involved (namely the woman) wakes up and doesn't remember consenting to sex, she can legally get the guy for rape and have a decent shot at winning. Whether or not she'll actually win is up in the air, but it can be done, and the authorities will take it seriously.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:27 AM
2

I becomes a matter of his word against her's. Anybody want to take a stab on how well that's probably going to work out for the accused?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:26 AM
1

If they have, I've never heard of it before.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:17 AM
16

The "alcohol = can't consent" rule is archaic and needs to be changed. I really don't like the way it systematically absolves people of personal accountability simply because they had a beer or two. The way I see it, if you're responsible enough to go out and get shit-faced drunk, then you should also bear full responsibility for what you may do during that time. And because of the way our society works, it's used almost exclusively for women. If two people have sex while intoxicated, neither of…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:05 PM
-1

By non-violent I mean she doesn't give off the impression that she's trying to hurt him. Watching the video, the guy obviously is not afraid of her nor does he consider her a threat IMO. Had I been in his shoes, I wouldn't consider her a threat either. I'm not saying she couldn't be violent or dangerous, I'm just saying that if she wanted to actually inflict damage, she'd likely have done so.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:43 AM
54

This all day long. I was thinking this the entire time "why the hell isn't anybody try to physically remove her". At one point, I even saw people trying to restrain him. =\ Even if she is just mistaken and non-violent, it's not ok to hold somebody against their will because they "think they know you". I probably would've at least the very least thrown her off. And I probably would've had to defend myself against a couple of the bystanders as well who would've inevitably intervened at that point.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:53 PM
10

On the subject on male vs. female violence, she brought up the point that men are physically stronger, which is true. However, the idea that due to our innate physical strength difference, a male is not allowed to hit a female (but the reverse is acceptable) clearly goes against the equality that feminism in general fights so vehemently for. If their goal is to be treated fairly (ie. held to the same standards men are), then should they not be allowed to strike us either. Men can't hit members o…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:07 AM
20

Ugh, feminism. It's feminism's fault that society's view of gender equality is as warped as it is today. It disgusts me to no end that feminists will complain, rally, and picket for gender equality, but are completely unwilling to accept anything negative that goes with it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter