Nightwing300 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Husband protects wife and saves her life, wounds are so massive that he turns into a vegetable, wife dumps him Idk man, I probably won’t wait for 10 years if my wife went to jail. Might not even wait for 5 tbh. And I wouldn’t expect her to as well. I’m guessing the other guy is okay with his situation too. She’s saying she won’t wait for him if he goes to prison, that’s all that means. Which is far better than telling him that she will and then cheating on him. Or even changing her mind later on and leaving him when he’s depressed and broken in jail.	/r/MensRights	20/04/18 10:21 AM
0	That “male privilege” though I never used the word contract, I said proof of agreement. And I'm hoping you do agree that agreement atleast is needed. It doesn't matter what world I want to live, the world I actually live in works this way. This is also why I stay slightly alert in a shady part of town, despite ideally I'd like to be relaxed. In the same way, if I'm hooking up with a complete stranger I like to be sure it won't bite me in the ass, so I'll be sure to bring my fetish(rough sex in this case) in the text convers…	/r/MensRights	14/10/17 10:16 PM
1	That “male privilege” though Lol you know that's not what I mean. If you're engaging in BDSM with a tinder match you're meeting for the first time, you're being gullible.	/r/MensRights	14/10/17 09:53 PM
1	That “male privilege” though Yeah but isn't that the case with most laws where consent is a factor? And if you're practicing BDSM with a stranger on the first meet without any previous conversation about it, you're literally digging a hole for yourself. It's like that wife who shot her husband in the chest for views at his behest(he was wearing a vest), it doesn't if he begged her to do it his death means that means the wife's going for murder.	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 02:31 PM
2	That “male privilege” though Yeah but if anyone's doing BDSM without prior written agreement to do so, and that too with strangers, they dumb. Plus nowhere in here is it written that there was BDSM involved(the guy hasn't brought that up as well). And aren't we using the word of a women and her wounds as such?	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 02:27 PM
2	That “male privilege” though we draw that line where either party doesn't consent to the action, if the other party continues its assault. You like spanking ass, that's well and good. But if your partner doesn't, and you cause actual injuring ignoring her denial of consent to the activity, you're committing a crime. That's where sexual liberty stops and crime starts. We can argue what the punishment for that would be, but it's a crime and a crime should have severe repurcussions imo. You keep ignoring the bit about consent,…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 04:16 AM
2	That “male privilege” though Actually I'm right with you about giving her a lot harsher sentence, and will always support that. And I wasnt the one who brought it up, you said she went off free, I informed that she didn't. Nowhere in that did I defend her. You seem to be reading something other than my comment. She should definitely not be allowed to practise medicine. My only point was that you have double standards for men and women, while this sub claims to want equality. If we don't know the full story, then we don't kn…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 04:08 AM
0	That “male privilege” though Actually in the case of the other girl, she was ordered to go to forced rehab, and keep sober. If she fucked that up, she'd get jail time, so neither of them got scot-free as this picture would like to tell you. Cmon are you kidding me? Do you genuinely believe this brilliant doctor doesn't know that hurting someone to the point that they're crying isn't cool? And a seminar/clinic and a fine would be the fountain of knowledge that'd fix him? I've paid parking fines and that didn't stop me from d…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 03:34 AM
2	That “male privilege” though What he did counts as sexual assault. And you're misunderstanding the situation, roughing her up initially can be considered a crime of passion, but ignoring her crying and telling him to stop makes this simple sexual assaults without any defenses available to him. And I doubt he was sentenced simply on the plaintiff's word. The doctor's report, bruise marks and doctor's testimony would surely play a part. Plus the guy didn't even go to jail. If being on the sex offender's list all the punishmen…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 03:22 AM
1	That “male privilege” though Yeah I can attest to the only missionary thing being false. As for BDSM, that's an entirely different thing and I'd suggest making sure there's proof of agreement to it before you engage in such activities(messages mails or whatever). However what does this have to do with the case though? And why are you comparing cause harm to someone who's pleading with the offender to stop hurting her which he ignores to nicks and dents? There are shitty women around who do shitty things and lie about sex. T…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 03:09 AM
1	That “male privilege” though Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. The victim, who said she was left bruised after the encounter, accused the then-trainee doctor of using “excessive force” after she had explicitly told him not to touch her breasts This is from the article. I'd say that falls in the purview of shit you can't get offe…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 02:06 AM
-3	That “male privilege” though Where in the title or my comments is rape mentioned? This is about sexual assault, rape is a type of sexual assault, but not all sexual assault is rape. And no, I haven't raped anyone in my life if we're going by the legal definition of rape. Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. The victim, who said she…	/r/MensRights	13/10/17 01:52 AM
1	That “male privilege” though How so? There's clear injury AND clear intention. That's what a crime is. You didn't call the cops and it's your right not to but that doesn't mean it's not a crime. What if she goes too far the next time cause she thinks the issue at hand is her inability to give a blowjob without injuring someone and cause actual harm like bites someone's dick off or cause erectile malfunction? You could've stopped that behavior, cause a light sentence is generally enough to nip this shit in the bud, but with …	/r/MensRights	12/10/17 11:14 PM
1	That “male privilege” though Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. The victim, who said she was left bruised after the encounter, accused the then-trainee doctor of using “excessive force” after she had explicitly told him not to touch her breasts At some point you can use logic to determine intent without explicit statement from th…	/r/MensRights	12/10/17 10:53 PM
1	That “male privilege” though Okay do at which point does shit becomes a crime? And I'd say this goes beyond just being inconsiderate, tickling her assholes if she doesn't like butt stuff is inconsiderate, causing harm to someone while they plead you stop is assault.	/r/MensRights	12/10/17 10:40 PM
1	That “male privilege” though That's true, but I reckon they went with a single charge to get the best conviction or something(I read that's a thing in the US). Well he assaulted her in a sexual manner, so the charge is fair. How do you think it isn't?	/r/MensRights	12/10/17 10:14 PM
5	That “male privilege” though Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. The victim, who said she was left bruised after the encounter, accused the then-trainee doctor of using “excessive force” after she had explicitly told him not to touch her breasts Not sure what kinda beast you're making, but I'd say that isn't part of the convention…	/r/MensRights	12/10/17 10:03 PM
1	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America I was asking more a coherent line if thought that tells you that stupidity is the dominant gene than a research paper. Are you including the resources from Brit colonies as well, which are mostly the reason for its industrialization? They are, but they still have enough eq to maintain some semblance of reality. They weren't? Do me a favor and look up the British raj please. The brits literally did this, shutting down existing universities and discouraging people from getting good education, othe…	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 12:31 PM
1	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America What I'm saying is if you have any sound logic or source to back it up. You're wrong here, then. Advancement requires so much more than just intelligence. For once, it requires a shit load of resources. This is Brits were able to advance so much faster than others. It also requires a decent bit of eq, since without emotional stability a researcher is just a narcissistic clown. And 'nearly' all progress? You realise that Asians were contributing just as much to science before they were fucked by …	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 11:12 AM
1	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America And do you have any real source to back your opinion? Evolution doesn't really work in ways you seem to think it does. Intelligent is only one attributes in a plethora of attributes needed for progress. Also, I see that its a general consensus here that Europeans are better than Africans, Indians, Asians and most of the races. But iirc, Europeans generally have the most Neanderthal DNA amongst human races. Shouldn't you support Jews then, since they're seen as smarter than whites by the alt-righ…	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 10:43 AM
1	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America Right, okay sure I'll give you that one. However, my question's fair if you're up to answering it. Isn't alt-right anti race-mixing? If so, why are you seeing interspecies mating as a plus, especially as the Neanderthals weren't particularly smart(close to how people here describe Africans actually). And since you've been the standup guy here and called me out on my straw manning, try to refrain from doing the same.	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 10:20 AM
2	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America So you're saying breeding with Neanderthals was good for humans, but race mixing will end all society and bring the dark ages? The mental gymnastics.	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 10:00 AM
3	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America And trump's helping with the nature of the internet?	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 08:50 AM
3	97% of accomplishment in the scientific inventories occured in Europe and North America Allowed? You needed permission?	/r/PussyPass	05/03/17 06:38 AM