TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No-Breath6663 Archive

View 1 post and 521 comments by No-Breath6663 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

DebateNo-Breath6663/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I cant cringe harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:42 PM
1

You're gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:38 PM
2

You are correct. As with most chronically online unemployed people, they skew mentally ill, LGBT, and extremist. Many of the women of this sub for example are just bitter losers. Which makes perfect sense, a subreddit about debating dating dynamics is going to have a strong selection bias for autistic, stunted, mentally ill losers in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:37 PM
2

Why wouldn't there be a difference? For example, men are more likely to be innocent victims of partner violence at the hands of women than vice versa. Yet there are far more women's shelters than men shelters. And women complain about it more. This isn't a new phenomenon. It exists for almost everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:34 PM
2

Women have told me to smile many times. I dont feel harassed because it's not harassment to tell someone to smile. If you believe that is harassment, you are a byproduct of our pudgy soft and weak society which allows you to whine about miniscule issues because you lack real issues. Instead, try being grateful.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:02 AM
0

You have that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:47 PM
0

Powerful 💪
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:22 PM
0

No, not even remotely true
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:15 PM
1

95% of the men who sub to an only fans woman would never date or marry them. They see them as sex objects, which they are Furthermore, they cannot date "up" to an only fans ho, because these women are lower on the social status ladder than most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 05:27 AM
2

The framing of your question is predicated around the incorrect assumption that free markets lead to disproportionate disparate outcomes. This is incorrect. Furthermore, the united States is already quasi socialist. The government spends 40% of its GDP each year, and has a near stranglehold over wealth redistribution and the ability of people to engage in the market freely. Exemplified by how during covid millions of small businesses were killed off by government mandates to shut them down.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 05:25 AM
1

Um yeah. Nobody is talking about being institutionalized. More like go talk to a nutritionist or a doctor. Read your own comments back and really think if this a reasonable way to act.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:34 AM
–

I'm not saying that to degrade you. I mean it seriously. You really do need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:18 AM
–

When it comes to flirting I've found that it really helps a lot to not try to be something you're not. So in other words I use my intellectual side to be attractive. It probably doesn't come off as too nerdy because I'm pretty masculine, and it's genuine. So what I'll do is on my profile, I'll assert that one of my hobbies is reading scientific literature publications for example. And so that gives me a window to speak about something a surprising amount of women are interested in. That's becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:16 AM
–

You are severely in need of help. Eating grains and coffee is indeed bad. The solution to that is not eating only raw meat and avoiding excercise. Whoever told you much of this is just incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:10 AM
1

What's really happening is as follows Women need men Women do not want men Men dont need Women Men want women Women need men because men keep society functioning, and are solely responsible for keeping women alive. No, women cannot run society and no they would not survive without men. Women do not want men, because men don't need them. As a byproduct of men not needing women, they are willing to do many things that women despise. This causes women to hold fear of men, and resentment and jealous…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:04 AM
–

Oh, why are you doing carnivore? Thats...not likely to be the right thing to do. A proper diet is meat, vegetables, fruits, dairy, eggs, nuts, and seeds. Most important thing is the meat, eggs and vegetables imo. If you're doing carnivore to lose weight, I don't think it's necessary or good. I believe it would be better to simply excercise 3-6x per week with weights and cardio, and to avoid any processed foods or drinking calories. Just those things alone should have you lose all the excess fat …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:50 AM
–

I posted a comment above this that details it
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:44 AM
–

The concept of the ceiling is pretty exaggerated imo. I gained 65lbs of weight, most of which is muscle, bone density etc. (I'm leaner than I was when I started) To give perspective on this, my shoulders are now 22 inches wide, my arms are 16.5 inches in circumference and my quadriceps are 28 inches circumference. To be frank, I don't need to be as muscular as I am at all as it stopped helping me be more attractive long ago. But what it did do was continue to re-shape my face and I cannot stress…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:43 AM
–

I worked for 10 years on myself to become attractive. And nobody claps in fact people just act like it's normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:03 AM
–

Autism held me back for so long from finding a girlfriend. But at this point I'm so unbelievably attractive that dating apps throw me up as one of the first profiles women see because I'm a giga chad. So I don't even have to try anymore. Earlier today some girl said she was waiting until marriage. I told her that's a deal breaker for me and she instantly responded "I'm open to changing my mind"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:56 AM
9

Men can do that all day long. They're still forced to pay all the taxes that women gobble up, and defend the women from everything under the sun as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:48 AM
-3

No, women want men more. That's why they put up with the shit men do. Men want women for 1 thing. Sex. And in some cases, some men are willing to commit. But there's a reason the there's a surplus of women searching for commitment compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:42 AM
1

It's not that women don't want men. It's that women seek to date seriously and generally avoid casual dating. Because the pool of men who feel the same is so much smaller, these women would prefer to avoid the risk altogether and as a result they choose not to date. You can compare it to how men don't want to marry a woman who's been previously divorced. They don't want to because there's too much risk. Similarly, the majority of women who don't date don't date because they believe they cannot f…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:41 AM
1

When I was over there pretty much infinite women would want to fuck me and wouldn't even be mad if I didn't want to date them after. So I don't think this idea is true that it's all about getting to America.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:14 AM
1

With the autism is also extreme nervousness of these environments. It's likely terrifying for him if an attractive women aggressively came onto him, despite how much he wants to find a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:06 AM
2

This is the most factual shit ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:59 AM
1

Yes. I did I'm autistic, and moreso than average. It has made dating for me unreasonably hard, and it caused me to develop a litany of traumatic responses due to all the trauma I experienced when dating. I have severe attachment and abandonment problems I never had before, I have severe depression and anxiety problems that developed. I have severe chronic insomnia. These are all largely a byproduct of dating for me. My autism made it extraordinarily hard to decipher and become good at socializat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:57 AM
–

Men get to choose who they want. Women get picked if they're lucky, and cope if they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:20 AM
–

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3574414/#:~:text=All%20facial%20and%20body%20measurements%20were%20linearly,body%20fat%20percentage%20of%2012%20per%20cent.&text=Circulating%20testosterone%20levels%20were%20significantly%20correlated%20with,masculinity%20(r69%20=%200.38%2C%20p%20=%200.001). "All facial and body measurements were linearly related to attractiveness, except body adiposity, which showed a curvilinear relationship, peaking at a body fat percentage of 12 per cent." Talking to …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:50 PM
4

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3574414/#:~:text=All%20facial%20and%20body%20measurements%20were%20linearly,body%20fat%20percentage%20of%2012%20per%20cent.&text=Circulating%20testosterone%20levels%20were%20significantly%20correlated%20with,masculinity%20(r69%20=%200.38%2C%20p%20=%200.001). "All facial and body measurements were linearly related to attractiveness, except body adiposity, which showed a curvilinear relationship, peaking at a body fat percentage of 12 per cent." The guy in …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:50 PM
2

And your metric for that conclusion is an online post? That's a pretty silly way to develop a worldview bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:23 PM
-2

The guy on the right is more healthy than the guy on the left. He is not sinewy or grotesque.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:08 PM
–

There's a solid amount of cope to be had in regards to this. Generally, if polls are having this outcome, it's because either the women who made those votes are largely fat and unattractive (therefore coping with the reality more attractive men won't want to be with them by asserting that they rejected those men first, which is a lie) or because it's a selection bias. Research has been done on this many times. Leaner guys are more attractive. Get over it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:07 PM
1

Well some of ehat you're saying is true, but in reality it's just because similarly aged women aren't attractive enough anymore to have as many suitors so the dynamic switches a lot in terms of who's being pursued.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:37 PM
0

It's just that commitment is attractive to women out of utility. Along with making money, being smart, and being socially adept. These things all display utility.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:36 PM
1

Because Chad is so high SMV he can potentially convince them to get pump and dumped and they won't even be that mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:37 AM
1

Link that data feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:04 AM
-1

This really just reinforces my argument
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:16 PM
1

Bruh. Reddit front page is the biggest leftist echo chamber on the web. And you think anything on here is representative of an organic and legitimate discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:11 PM
1

Nobody thinks reddit is credible. Virtually every human that uses it is lying about everything, and many accounts are literally bots.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:07 PM
1

Someone like yourself is so out of touch with reality, to the point you think reddit is a valid source of credible people having realistic discussion about their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:02 PM
1

I already addressed why it's not contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:52 PM
1

Ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:50 PM
1

🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:46 PM
1

So youre under the impression that people are lying on pew survey about what type of relationship they're seeking? I'm sure some do, but there's little reason to believe any meaningful number are doing that. Whereas when it comes to survey data asking you if you're happy or successful or blah blah blah...of course people lie. We can measure it out in demographic research for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:36 PM
1

That's an illusion. And they even know this. There's not enough men willing to commit to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:35 PM
1

Women falsely believe they are independent and do not need men. Women manipulate society at every turn to their advantage and provide nothing of value back. In the process of doing so they damage men and then turn around and play the victim. This issue is so baked in and pervasive at this point that 1 in 4 women are diagnosed mentally ill, and the true number is likely much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:29 PM
1

Honestly, you sound like a terrible example of a man. If your woman wants to be unemployed you should support it. If you want a career oriented partner, go find a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:24 PM
1

There's literally 0 advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:22 PM
2

My woman demands more sex than I do. Honestly, practically every woman I've dated has felt the same way. I believe it's because I'm very good at sex and I'm attractive. This makes them want it often, but also makes me want it less (because sex is much more physically taxing on a man than a woman) So I get tired, I run out of stuff and women can keep going for longer and have more stuff. Most guys, imo, struggle to get sex from girls their with as often because these women settled for a man they …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:21 PM
3

Women feel more pressured to be in a relationship, so they're going to lie to themselves about why they're not in one (my standards are too high), and lie about how it's affecting them. (I'm doing fine! downs bottle of depression pills) You cannot account for that bias. And yes, relationships are the primary thing that is going to be on virtually everyone's mind. We're human beings. Everyone cares about relationships for the most part. Women even more so, as reflected in everything relating to w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:15 PM
2

I've seen this study before. If your entire worldview is shaped off of a survey, idk what to tell you. Surveys are notorious for being filled with blatant lies from participants (coping mechanism) Example, self reported penis size studies have results which are way higher than measured by doctors. Because men lie about penis size. So when looking at single and in relationship people, the best way to measure the results is to look at outcome data. Depression diagnosis, suicide rates etc. Cross re…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:02 PM
0

Pew research has conducted research that confirms that there is a surplus of women seeking commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:55 PM
2

Mountains of research confirm this. Single and separated women are universally less happy, more depressed and suicidal than those in relationships. Pew Research also confirms that there is a surplus of women seeking commitment as compared to men. (Like 2x as many)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:55 PM
1

Yeah a small subset of men who are even willing to given commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:53 PM
-2

I disagree. Women need men very badly. Everything related to their "demands" is just illusion and fluff. Their main demand is commitment. The idea they have all these other demands that come after that are largely just a coping mechanism they use to explain away why they're single. (It's because not even average men will committ to them) Pew research put out data effectively demonstrating there's a massive surplus of women seeking commitment, and a massive surplus of men seeking casual sex and r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:23 PM
-1

Men are always highly sought after, always will be and always have been. Men are the ultimate resource of society for everything with the exception of giving birth. Men provide every ounce of value society has in all realms. Women take advantage of this where they can, but at the end of the day they all have a desperate need for men, and men merely want women for sexual pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:15 PM
3

Women feel objectified because these guys your referring to objetify them. These guys just wanna fuck them when they feel like it for an ego boost and keep them on the side with no commitment. In reality, these women know little to no men want to committ to them and that's why they create all these copes to feel better about this reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:09 PM
–

1 Women are engaged in constant social engineering of society and are constantly using in group preference to shift the social narrative to be to their utilitarian advantage. 2 women's in group preference is a tool to try and gain access to as much things as possible from men, while giving as minimal in return. 3 one of their main socially engineered and false claims is that they are all so desirable and men want them so bad. This is an illusion and its completely false. Pew Research shows that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:04 PM
-1

As men age they become highly sought after compared to women their age. High amount of supply results in low amount of demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 01:53 PM
2

It's because conventionally attractive men that are interested in LTR with more than a small minority of women are exceedingly rare, and women are aware of this and as a result they try to cope with it by asserting their own SMV as higher than it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 01:51 PM
3

In reality women are very desperate for marriage and LTR, they tend to act this way towards men as a defense mechanism out of fear that these men will pump and dump them. They do have these ideas about their league, but those ideas are usually a way to cope with the fact that they're not actually that attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 01:49 PM
–

We genitally mutilate most of our boys. Men in aggregate pay all taxes. Men have less rights than women. Men used against their will in military service to protect women who retain the ability to r*pe them in divorce, take their kids, and face less punishment for equal crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 03:44 AM
–

Barely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 03:42 AM
1

You're a redditor. You guys unironically are considered to be the most extremist weirdo people on the internet, and the majority of the population literally disagrees with you on virtually everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 03:33 AM
1

Yeah, but the key component to these factors is truly diabolical. Because it's not just that women recieve these benefits. It's how they get them. They get them all off the tax dollars of the hard working men who unironically are keeping society from collapsing. All of the infrastructure, the defense, everything. Almost entirely men who pay disproportionate amount in taxes, that women then use the taxes for numerous things. This system gives unbelievable amount of power systemically to women via…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 10:16 AM
1

You and other women shame men from expressing opinions that if they gained traction would threatened your social dominance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 05:08 PM
1

Your argument about single moms also falls flat because the vast majority of single moms didn’t plan it that way, and it’s impossible to say who is at fault in a majority of these divorces. It's not impossible. No fault divorce is a bad thing. When you enter a marriage, you agree to the union to the benefit of the children it will create. You make a commitment to doing the right thing for the child. Because that will have the greatest benefit to everyone involved. As a result, people often divor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:48 AM
1

You can't produce sperm.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:41 AM
1

Why do women take more than they give from social security? They work less hours, lower paying jobs, and they're physically weaker, less durable etc. So as a result, they end up using more welfare than they provide in general. Women as a group are entirely dependent on men in other words. And not in the normal sense of reproduction. But in the sense of economically, society would not be able to function if all people were female. This is a system in which women have effectively been provided the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:41 AM
1

Social power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:32 AM
1

No we weren't. You're not knowledgeable enough about this subject to continue this dialogue.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:32 AM
1

Women are the primary perpetrators of IPV style violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:20 AM
2

DEI is a great example.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:19 AM
1

This asserts that these things can't auto regulate by voluntary decision, and it's simply a fact that they can. It also assumes no moral inferiority to the idea that forcing a man to pay for children that are not his is totally fine. It also ignores the real world effects of this system that has allowed single motherhood to raise to never before seen proportions of the population, and crime to be at an all time high.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:18 AM
0

We measure it based on auto regulation of societies demands at large. There's no universe where you get to change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:16 AM
2

If teachers are so important and valuable then why is society is a steady collapse foe over 40 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:15 AM
1

When have you ever seen a woman create a sperm? Your argument is devoid of value entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:14 AM
1

This is another prime example of an attempt at socially engineering a situation. Other women, due to in group bias alone, will see a comment like this. A condescending comment devoid of any value and agree with it simply to give women more power.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:13 AM
1

Women tend to have somewhat better verbal skills, but men are not simpletons, and this idea is insulting to both men and women. Men and women both are fully capable of manipulation and being manipulated. I agree that men are simpleton necessarily and also have the capacity for manipulation. And where my argument majorly falls flat is when you look at truly "patriarchal" societies that do exist in the world. Places like Saudi Arabia for example, or Afghanistan. Men can be manipulative and do larg…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:12 AM
2

So the only productive labor worthy of compensation is labor done begrudgingly and by force? Ironically it's the exact opposite. It's when people agree to what the labor is worth by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:19 PM
-4

No, that would only apply to surrogates. Women who choose to do it for free are a different equation. That's like saying that I deserve infinite money if I gave 1 million dollars to a man and he used it to cure cancer. I'm not owed anything in that scenario. I gave it away freely. If I had given him a stipulation that I get paid it would be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:16 PM
-3

I'm acknowledging that men and women make different amount of money, matched to their productivity. Women make less because they do less important jobs, or because they don't work as many hours etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:13 PM
0

It's not some women in the shadow. Women do it openly. You're doing it right now, by using subversive tactics to imply that my idea is crazy and an outrageous conspiracy theory. When we both know that you know that women weild a lot of social power in general. You're currently fighting back against that idea despite knowing it to be true, because it reduces the power your in group holds if more people believe what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:11 PM
-2

Women are the ones letting that happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:06 PM
-3

No. I'm saying in aggregate men are taxed more because they make more, and women in aggregate use more of those tax dollars for things like welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:05 PM
-5

We know men and women share similar iq. It's not a byproduct of stupidity, but a series of endocrinology and genetics. Men are predisposed to satisfy women, and women are predisposed to utilize their social skills to take advantage of men psychologically because they cannot do so physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:54 PM
1

I'm an extraordinarily fit, healthy and attractive younger man. I have a high paying and prestigious job. I'm a normal height. I'm extremely lean and strong. I'm very handsome facially. On dating apps I can expect a handful of likes per week, maybe 20 likes in a week. Almost every like is from an obese single mom or a whore. I should not have to fight tooth and nail to find a normal woman who isn't a whore, and isn't obese. And yet I do have to do that. My last relationship? I A barely functiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 04:44 AM
1

Sounds like they weren't attracted to you chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:19 AM
1

I see women sacrificing everything for their families. Ruining their bodies to have kids. Women's bodies naturally cull (murder) male fetuses during pregnancy when they're under stress. This happens little with female fetuses. Working full time and still doing the majority of household chores and housework. Men work more total hours between labor and household chores than women do. Women making an effort to do something special for their partners birthdays. This is something men do for women. No…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:27 AM
1

Well allow me to be nuanced then. Majority of dysfunctional people coming from single mother household is taken at face value. This is because women are incentivised to divorce men and given very preferential treatment in family court. Women who don't deserve custody are often given custody and men have to be extra deserving to gain custody. But bring up that 90% of rapists are men, then we see cries of sexism and not looking at other factors. Yes 90% of rapists are men in terms of convictions. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:22 AM
–

Do you have a point or...?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:28 AM
–

Men in those age groups have more money and stability. Those women generally only want to date those men who are within their age range and make good money etc. Those men are happy to date younger women and could care less about finances. So yeah, those women end up lowering their standards due to dating imbalances.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:24 AM
–

Rate of divorce and odds are roughly identical between the ages of 25 and 34. Above or below these ages has a very slight increase in risk. http://www.nicholaswolfinger.com/blog/2015/04/29/revisiting-the-relationship-between-age-at-marriage-and-divorce/ Correlation, however, does not equal causation. The reason behind this is primarily a byproduct of nothing more than finances, and quality of mate. At the ages of 18-24 you have the same odds of divorce as those above 34. That should be all the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:21 AM
-2

Bro is a beta
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 08:52 PM
0

Bro is coping using debunked terminology
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:07 AM
5

Men want to be the safe choice that a woman thinks is a good man and kind and loyal, while simultaneously retaining the dangerous powerful nature of a man who's "risky and hot" - as long as it's a woman the man finds to be worth a LTR. If not, he doesn't care and likely just wants to smash. In other words, men want to be seen as hot in bed but a good husband and father everywhere else. Men in aggregate cannot achieve this though, so they're angry they have to pick one. Either be the narcissistic…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:09 AM
1

Did you read that? Males. The males are in charge of eliminating competition and putting DNA in an average of six females. And just like that you've proven yet again your bad faith. The assertion you've put forth was proven incorrect when I established that females engage in sexual selection. Asserting that males also engage in resource dominance doesn't disprove that. Checkmate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 11:47 PM
1

https://cbs.umn.edu/lion-research-center/all-about-lions/social-behavior Female lions kill other prides cubs, refuse to reproduce with males that haven't become the dominant Coalition relative to their own pride, and defend their cubs from being killed by seperate coalitions as well. Good job, you've discovered sexual selection. Kindly stop acting how you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 10:49 AM
2

Your entire argument boils down to "man bad" and "lion have harem!" Which demonstrates that you unironically don't know how lions maintain harems or why, which unironically proves your entire argument completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 10:29 AM
1

No clue what you're even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:25 AM
1

You want to stop lying about what I said? I never made a bait and switch. You completely made that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:22 AM
1

I linked multiple sources for multiple purposes. Everything I said is just correct. The CDC data you're referring to was included in my first source and used specifically to answer your question about my source. No bait and switch ever happened. lesbians have at bare minimum equal rates of abuse from women, and it's most likely the case that they have much higher rates
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:20 AM
2

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/ipv-sex-abuse-lgbt-people/ "and that almost a third of lesbian women who have experienced such incidents have had one or more male perpetrators." One or more male perpetrators does NOT mean that 30% was ONLY male perpetrators and NEVER female perpetrators. Especially made obvious by the fact that many lesbian women have had male partners historically https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2000/03/many-lesbians-have-had-sex-men-taking-full-sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:12 AM
1

I know what you're referring to, the CDC data that was compiled showed lesbians had a higher prevalence of IPV than straight women.. The claim (usually by feminists) is that the amount by which it is higher is offset by how many lesbians had male perpetrators. Of all of the groups, lesbians are the least likely to report being abused exclusively by the sex they are most likely to date (women). And claims like this one, which is misleading. Lesbians are most likely to report that they haven't bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 07:08 AM
2

The CDC reported that of that 40%, 66% reported that it was a female partner and 44% was a man. That's innacurate and a common coping strategy. In reality, the data said that the majority was ONLY female perpetrated, and something like 30% had been in an IPV situation with at least 1 man, which doesn't exclude how many women they've had that same experience with
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:16 AM
2

Do men just not listen in school and also lack simple observation skills? Or is it because red pilled men are indoor men/gamers who have no desire to learn what happens outside? This is just content less rhetoric. If you dont have an argument just don't bother responding. Female reproductive strategy drives dimorphism. It's a simple fact, and it's even more true now in an Era where survivability rates are super high. Dumbest thing I ever read here. It's objective fact as long as you follow evolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:08 AM
2

Nope It's a fact been proven many times on pew and other places. Duh. Proving the op The claim was that men don't provide and protect which is erroneous. The claim was not that women don't ever do those things. That's a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:58 AM
2

I dont think you properly read my comment. I was explaining that dimorphism is a result of sexual selection. Not all animals have larger males. Ftfo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:47 AM
1

You'd never know if they went out of their way to sabotage you behind your back.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:46 AM
3

Guess you didn’t pay attention in school, but sexually dimorphic males also fight one another for resources and territory, which leads to increased size of the victors. All genetically viable strategies are a result of ONLY 2 things. Sexual selection and survivability. Female reproductive strategy is what drove male dimorphism. Female reproductive strategy is why men are large. Female reproductive strategy is conducive to having bigger stronger men to protect them. Female reproductive strategy i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:38 AM
1

Help me what?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:48 AM
1

What do you mean???
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:47 AM
1

I dont really understand what you're asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:42 AM
1

What do you mean? Are you trying to say something?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:41 AM
–

Are you upset or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:37 AM
–

You disagreed without content and therefore broke the rules. As such that comment will be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:36 AM
–

No content less rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:32 AM
5

If I pay for a friends lunch am I providing for them? Yes. PROVIDING childcare. But women also work. Yeah women also provide and protect. Men do it more typically, but women do other things more. That's why roles exist. So they do more providing than men do Men put in more aggregate hours of domestic labor and work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:32 AM
0

Women commit more domestic violence towards men than vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:30 AM
1

No wonder a lot of women don't want anything to do with that anymore. As a man, I'm asking you to please believe this and go through with it. Do not participate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:42 AM
6

Spiders Spiders can unironically kill you. Paying for a date isn't providing. Provide: verb make available for use; supply. In other words, a man's money makes the food on a date available for use. It's definitionally providing. Given that you think otherwise it would show why you're making the incorrect claim that men are not in aggregate providers. It's a byproduct of your incorrect assumptions about what providing actually is. Providing is when you give money or objects. On date 1 men are exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:41 AM
3

This isn’t traditional gender roles, that’s literally biological. Traditional gender roles are a function of biology. Men fulfill their roles inarguably in the united States. On average women make less money but are freely given more money, and on average men work significantly more hours a week than women do when accounting for domestic labor+at their jobs. Men are also proven to stop crime and the elements from harming women as well. IE plumbing, electricity, A/C, animal control, firefighters,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:36 AM
4

Sex hormones contribute to dimorphism as a result of sexual selection. Not like there's an entire field of science dedicated to this phenomenon or anything...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:32 AM
12

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/14747049211032351 "Findings revealed that in general, women rated stronger men as more attractive than weaker men irrespective of the ecological condition." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9454610/ "participants on average preferred taller-than-average male mates," That’s called sexual dimorphism, it isn’t a “preference The fact that men and women are dimorphic is a result of preference. That's what evolution is. Sexual selection and surviva…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:32 AM
-1

So you live in a world where men are 50% of the population And men are roughly 95% of the time going to be bigger, stronger, and more physically capable than you. And men make up 80+ percent of roles within firefighters, police, prison guards, security, and military. And men make up 80+ percent of electricians, construction, hard labor, sewer workers, trash men, coal miners, etc etc. So men account for the vast majority of dangerous provisional roles, and even make significantly more money than …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:28 AM
-1

Seen it a million times. When I was on the dating scene one of the easiest ways to screen a woman was to meet her friends. Before you know it their friends blabber about how many dudes she's been with and whatever degenerate stuff she's done. 10/10 recommend.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 08:05 AM
1

I'm gonna need your help to interpret research like this. I'm not a geneticist. Can you elaborate in detail?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 07:07 AM
1

Yes. For example, your number of male vs female ancestors is 2:1 ratio. In other words, men have historically in majority of cases been unable to reproduce. This is because of warfare (men go to war, women stay at home and stay safe), and female mate choices. For example, pre historically during hunter gatherer tribes, the lack of resource compiling ability (due to no agriculture) resulted in women needing men, and so they selected to be with any resourceful man they could in monogamous or seria…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:09 AM
1

Women have had a lot of power throughout all of history and the claim they didn't is easily debunked with basic data and historical information.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:53 AM
–

Incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:42 AM
0

Why, are you gonna have a fit?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:33 AM
1

Average height is 5'9.5" and weight is 195.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:32 AM
1

The average 35 year old man is 5’8 and 210 pounds and suffering from health and age related impotence and hair loss. Because they don't train their bodies. Also your stats are incorrect. But the oldest woman in Sports Illustrated’s Swimsuit issue was 84, so according to your metric, women are hot and photogenic up to age 84. Photoshop. Not the male gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:08 AM
1

It does translate to the average man. You're a woman and couldn't possibly understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:59 AM
1

I'm talking about male athletic prime. It's when I said it is, and that applies to majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:40 AM
0

The 80-20 rule if applied to online dating would apply to majority of relationships because that's how they start now. But the idea is based on a decade old study that isn't even legitimate science in the first place. Furthermore, the reason it doesn't apply is because of the strong differences in dating goals between genders, with men preferring casual and women preferring serious. Online has more male users, because male users are more interested in casual relationships. The gender disparity i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:39 AM
1

The 80-20 rule if applied to online dating would apply to majority of relationships because that's how they start now. But the idea is based on a decade old study that isn't even legitimate science in the first place. Furthermore, the reason it doesn't apply is because of the strong differences in dating goals between genders, with men preferring casual and women preferring serious. Online has more male users, because male users are more interested in casual relationships. The gender disparity i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:39 AM
1

No clue what you're on about liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:34 AM
0

You dont know what peer review is
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 06:18 AM
1

There's tons of data on the topic. You're a liberal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:28 AM
1

You have no clue what you're talking about. All champion level mma fighter are in their 30s All elite powerlfiters and strong men are in their 30s. The best NBA players are around 30. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:28 AM
1

It's less of a factor for women than men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:22 AM
0

That's not peer reviewed research, it's survey data from pew...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:18 AM
1

Data overwhelmingly shows that women are attracted to men who have money, are physically strong, and competent in a sexual way. I can be ugly but strong and rich and women will like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:17 AM
1

Athletic prime of a man is between the ages of 28 and 38. Most of the time, 29-34. Physical strength typically peaks between 33 and 45. Have that asterisk if you're gonna talk about age
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:12 AM
6

Knowledge of redpill is not fringe. People that religiously watch podcasts and similar RP stuff are fringe, yes. But people know what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:10 AM
4

The red pill is so mainstream that the people I meet on the day to day make references to it, and my girlfriend new what it was in great detail before we met. (And hated it a lot) It's still objectively incorrect about a series of things that have been debunked ad nauseum (such as the 80-20 rule and more) So it's best to not follow its principles unless it's getting money and learning charisma and going to the gym. Other than that, the ideas can be thrown out.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:01 AM
0

It does to someone who's mentally ill
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 05:29 AM
2

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:42 AM
1

Oh be quiet if you're so scared go get a gun. Nobody cares about your irrational fears and no they're not an excuse to argue that regular guys are as likely to attack you as a bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:36 AM
2

Incorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:18 AM
1

You are a guy, you don't know the fear that possible sexual assault brings for women. I've never come close to anything or seen a bear, but the thought of it seems scarier than being mauled and killed. This is precisely why you should learn to stop talking and listen. You think being raped, IE forcibly penetrated in a hole designed to be penetrated, is WORSE than being EATEN ALIVE? That is the absolute most absurd thing I've heard in a long time. It's a mentally defunct and ill thing to say. A b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:15 AM
3

I know dozens of women who have lied about SA.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 04:42 AM
1

This is just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 04:41 AM
1

You can't read what I wrote or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 AM
1

No you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 AM
0

And false allegations are even harder to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 AM
7

You are being ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:31 AM
0

He did
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:30 AM
–

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:29 AM
1

You dont understand studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:10 AM
1

Didn't watch
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:10 AM
1

Yeah is that why the link I provided showed majority of women making that exact claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:01 AM
1

You've made 0 relevant points.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 11:00 AM
1

Bro is using chat gpt no wonder You don't know what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:58 AM
1

This is pure cope
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:57 AM
-2

Rape cases that don't court are usually for things like lack of evidence not lack of guilt This is false and made up. No evidence of it, and its the opposite of the truth, that most reported rapes that don't go to court are false, at higher rates than those that do go to court. Convictions are very low, remember that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:57 AM
1

Learn to do it yourself. You lost this one clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:54 AM
7

The studies establish that proven false accusations are consistently low (around 5.5%) which aligns with most crime reporting rates. Incorrect and not even remotely true. That's roughly 5x higher than the next highest rate, false theft accusations. False rape allegations are unbelievably more common to a scary level, and definitely way more than the proven rate of 2-10%.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:54 AM
1

And you'd know they're telling the truth how?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:52 AM
1

Nice opinion piece, you have no idea how far out of your depth you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:52 AM
-1

Rape cases that go to court are more likely to be true than those that don't. Overall rape reports in survey data are like well in excess of 50% false. In Court, it's astoundingly high rates of false allegations.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:51 AM
1

You're wrong. Give up its embarrassing how you blather about this non stop acting like you didn't say some low iq stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:48 AM
21

5.5% is NOT low. That's RIDICULOUS. Fbi data showed 7% of rape allegations were PROVEN FALSE IN COURT. It is literally harder to prove allegations false than prove a real rape happened. And the rate of conviction is 10%. False rape allegations are literally more than TWICE as likely as the 2nd most likely false allegation, which is false accusation of theft. Rape is likely the ONLY CRIMINAL ALLEGATION where it is plausible that MORE FALSE ALLEGATIONS ARE HAPPENING THAN REAL RAPES. think about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:47 AM
1

Yeah nice try bud. You have no idea what you're even talking about. As usual with people like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:40 AM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32201145/ Vaginal intercourse was reported by 62% of the overall cohort as the best trigger of orgasm, followed by external stimulation from the partner (48%) or themselves (37%).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:40 AM
1

No concrete examples from you. Incorrect This is a well debunked myth. Incorrect I don't know what does that has to do with me... Don't care about you I'm talking about single males. That demographic at least in my country has most males fit. Incorrect I can dm you pics of me You are hopeless because your reputations are absurd and blatantly wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:28 AM
1

I haven't critiqued the study, I'm critiquing your use of the studies as justification for your conclusion. You failed to make a critique. I haven't made my my argument, I'm critiquing yours That is an argument The fact that you thought that referring to other studies was a metastudy shows that you're out of your depth. I dont think you know what you're even saying And none of that means the studies justify your conclusion, which is what this debate is about, which you don't seem to understand. …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:25 AM
–

What are you talking about "doesn't subscribe to capitalism" That is not what I described. I described the government taking immense amounts of your tax dollars (especially as a start up or small business) and literally just willy nilly giving it to other people and to corporations. That is NOT capitalism. Capitalism is a free market. An example of a time when the market was free-er would be the united States in-between 1930-1939, and 1950-1990 It's no secret that the economic height of living a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:22 AM
1

Gonna cry?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:13 AM
1

Lol Lolololololol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:13 AM
0

I also begged my husband to penetrate me. To make sex more fun for him. It doesn’t mean that I needed a dick inside me. Not relevant to my situation. I'm referring to women I wasn't even trying to have sex with in the given moment mostly. That just wanted to have sex badly. All literature doesn’t confirm this. Books focused on female pleasure focus on clitoris. The problem is you think books are a relevant and valid form of literature on the topic. That's not correct. Scientific literature on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:13 AM
4

It's sending the wrong message to young girls who are eating this up on social media "You should choose what you want to do, you don't have to be a wagie if you don't want." You have a problem with that message because you don't believe in freedom. It puts these women in a vulnerable position of being financially dependent on a male. Instead of financially dependent on a corporate monopoly that makes them work slave hours in perpetual eternity until they die? In reality, this is precisely why ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:55 AM
1

Women have always called me nice and sweet and still dated me and slept with me. This is incel rhetoric and untrue. Women love kind guys as long as they're not a weak frail man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:49 AM
1

All of your friends a liars or sexually defunct and inexperienced. Go meet an actual non-reddit women. This echo chamber is full of absolute psychopaths. I've had sex with more than enough women who have begged me to penetrate them to know for a fact that vaginal intercourse if by far the most important part. Furthermore, ALL LITERATURE CONFIRMS IT
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:48 AM
1

Wasn't the right won by suffragates organizing and protesting, working to change the law? You think that's something women earned? Again, men DIED for it and then CHOSE to give women the same thing they died for. Yes SOME women organized for this, that's entirely irrelevant to the point. They did not have to go out there and spend 10 years in brutal war fighting against tyranny of autocracies like men did. It's not like women just stayed home and chilled, they participated in war with various ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:44 AM
1

So what exactly does that mean? Any links? Or just gave me an example pls. Merely type into Google "epigenetics" it's at this point an extremely well researched phenomenon and you'll find countless information on it. An example would be a male growing up in a very hostile environment with tons of violence (assuming diet is equal to a version of himself in a different environment) would have significantly higher androgenic expression. Ok, but HOW do you hypertrophy them to a significant degree? W…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:39 AM
1

Ok good then we agree you should be locked up. /woosh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:32 AM
1

Lol when you don't know anything about female anatomy lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:31 AM
1

That is not what the study you presented said. If you would have read it, you would know that. Youre effectively arguing the very common and basic restrictions section of a data set refute its premise and findings. This is laughable and incorrect. There are flaws in all types of data gathering. Nothing stated refutes an ounce of what I said. Given that this fact is what your argument hinges on, figure that out and get back to me. To repeat; the authors of the study themselves say the reason is u…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 08:31 AM
1

False
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:26 AM
1

What do you mean? It's a well observed and documented fact that genetic expression (which genes are activated at a given time) depends on environmental factors. Both during and after development. You can't gain muscles in the face lmao, https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/the-facial-muscles Photos and descriptions of facial muscles, all of which can induce hypertrophy of the face. It's also an easily observable phenomenon that has occurred many many many times in real people that you can s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:25 AM
1

No, penetration is the last thing needed to orgasm. Penis doesn’t stimulate the top of the clit. Our source of pleasure is outside of our vagina. Studies have disproven that nonsense long ago. As such your claim is based off of a flase affirmative and is dismissed entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:17 AM
1

No, the data selects for men who choose to seek joint custody, either through trial or through simple discussion, period. You are making assumptions that they are actually abnormal men. Wrong. It selects for men who are more likely to be more successful. These men are more likely to pursue it because they're more likely to be more successful. You actually have no information at all about the chances of success for the men who didn’t try. You are merely assuming the counter factual. I've already …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:16 AM
1

I'm talking about literature that uses the scientific method to create predictive models. You lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:13 AM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:12 AM
1

There's unlimited access to literature that proves this false claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 11:10 AM
1

Can you post the part of the study that explains that? https://www2.psy.uq.edu.au/~uqbziets/Puts%20et%20al%20EHB%202011%20higher%20orgasm%20freq%20with%20more%20masculine%20partners.pdf Actually read it. Every table, the results and discussion all spell out in plain English everything I've said. This literature is unbelievably rigorous and singularly destroys your entire premise. Also, a single study is not enough to make a definitive statement. You said there were studies. Can you link the mult…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:58 AM
1

False affirmative statement and immediately dismissed as typical illogical rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:35 AM
1

That's not even remotely relevant to the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:35 AM
1

Then maybe you deserve to be locked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:30 AM
2

It's way higher than 30%.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 10:08 AM
1

So blatant you're lying. Real pain is not something you "get over" during sex. Man or woman. Real pain is something that instantly turns you off and ruins intercourse by destroying boners and drying up vaginas. Jesus christ you love to lie. In the times where I've actually hurt a woman during sex, they've ALWAYS curled up into a ball and told me, and then lost the mood. Same can be said for vast majority of times I've been hurt during sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:56 AM
1

Women by and large can't even make themselves orgasm during masturbation, and consistently fail to orgasm unless their partner does everything for them. It's like getting a yelp review from someone with downsyndrome. You have absolutely no clue about sex in general and neither do most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:53 AM
-2

I hit my girls cervix all the time. Guess what. It doesn't hurt because she's actually enjoying the sex. Something you clearly have no understanding or knowledge of.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:49 AM
-3

Maybe if you'd bother to actually read the literature you wouldn't say such obviously false things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:44 AM
-1

Reddit women who get no play sure do love to continually parrot this scientifically debunked on several occasions misinformation. Most women can and do orgasm from penetrative sex, in fact it's the number 1 most important thing for achieving orgasm PERIOD. The number 1 external factor is partner attractiveness, which is related to things like penis size, shoulder width, income, intelligence etc. "Oh sure YOU'RE gonna tell ME how MY body responds!!!11" As I've done many times in person with many …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:44 AM
–

Okay Okay is irrelevant and unrelated to the post and as such is dismissed. keep Affirmative statement implying already stationary inside the prederminate claim you've made and is therefore both false and dismissed. living Component of aforementioned affirmative and false claim and is therefore irrelevant, incorrect and dismissed. in False statement about location of opponents mindset and therefore dismissed as bunk. that Implies direct understanding of area mentioned in first part of sentence a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:18 AM
1

Notice how you didn't bother to cite what needed evidence because you've been utterly destroyed and know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 07:08 AM
0

Buddy, you're trying to use complicated sentences to make yourself look smarter, but in turn nobody will ever understand what you're trying to say. It's simply the correct and most deliberate way to speak. You don't understand because you're not equipped to. This is your problem and unrelated to the conversation at large entirely. As such this paragraph is dismissed as irrelevant. Next time be clearer with your statements, so the audience clearly knows what you want to say. I was clear, you are …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 06:51 AM
1

Go up and read parent comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:26 AM
1

I'm only aware of one study, however I just wanted to point out; correlation isn't causation. The study in question used causative predictive factors to link the higher wealth status to being more attractive, and showed that attractiveness was number 1 predictor of female orgasm during sex. Just because more women reports orgasms with a wealthier partner, doesn't necessarily mean wealth is the reason. It is because wealth is attractive. It could be; wealthier men may have more sexual partners, T…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:24 AM
1

The data shows men getting custody more than half of the time when they try. Because the data selects for men who seek joint custody and men who already have high chances of success They get custody less often overall because they are, as you put it, “less likely to perform this behavior”. Because the system assumes female custody and according to the data has a blatant bias towards female custody. You cannot measure the counter factual. Yes you can You don’t understand statistics at all if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:22 AM
1

I rarely comment... Probably for the best. I'm sorry but I'm not sure you realize the amount of gibberish you put in this post. This sentence fails to point out any flaws in my post and is therefore invalid and entirely dismissed as bunk and false. I'm sure all those lifters are so happy they've gotten inches on their height. This sentence is incongruent with reality as it indicates that I made the claim lifters can gain height by lifting. When in reality I said "with lifts" as in wearing lifts …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:20 AM
1

Go up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:17 AM
1

You said that I claimed that 10% of marriages have female breadwinners. I never said that: 16% of marriages have female breadwinners, and out of those 10% are primary meaning the man still works, 6% percent are sole, meaning the man has no income. Incorrect. Like I told you, that's not how numbers work. "10 percent" isn't equivalent to 10/16, it's equivalent to 62.5%. Stop goal post shifting and gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:16 AM
1

That's what you're trying to do with this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 05:15 AM
1

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 08:17 AM
1

10% and 6% can't be confused you don't even know what they're referencing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 08:16 AM
1

Your entire argument is bunk and therefore to be dismissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 08:16 AM
1

I was talking with someone else, not your illogical self. Cry about it. And that was also literally said in response to them saying not to just focus on one type of marriage. And I literally analyzed several types. You goal post shifted. Anyways, what is it called when you cannot even tell the difference between sole and primary breadwinners, and come up with random numbers that no study in the world agrees with? Then try to deflect by not addressing anything from the actual comment you are repl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 07:09 AM
1

My primary argument is that dating prospects, opportunities and success is just a byproduct of genetics. So self improvement is very limited in how much it truly changes your dating prospects and success. Genetics and genetic expression can be altered significantly with environmental factors. (IE decision making) It would not include something like losing lots of body fat since obesity is not a natural baseline state. Neither is being muscular. This sentence is incorrect and therefore dismissed.…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:44 AM
1

You are actually so unreasonable it’s not even fun to argue with you… I have a better time with TRPs so that says a lot. Irrelevant character attack. Dismissed. It’s clear you have an agenda, we pretty much all do, but that doesn’t mean you also have to lack reading comprehension and try to twist my words as well as come up with random numbers. False, didn't happen. Dismissed paragraph. And in the naive hopes you can take in information better this time: 6% of marriages are wife SOLE earner. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:21 AM
1

Read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:19 AM
1

Goalposts shift. "I am also stating how stay-at-home husbands have it a lot better than stay-at-home wives, while you and everyone else is still complaining about the stay-at-home wives/moms being leeches. And I have also been analyzing the study for every single type of marriage." Your organization comment was about stay at home husbands. YOU shifted that elsewhere when you were made to look foolish. Just because you think you can direct the conversation however you like doesn't mean it will ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:19 AM
1

The way I went about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:16 AM
1

Are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:15 AM
1

The difference between us is that I don’t think fathers should all just give up when everything isn’t perfect. Strawman. I never made this claim, I merely pointed out the statistical fact that if a group is given deterrents to a given behavior, they will be less likely to perform this behavior than a group who is given incentives. Hell, if most fathers give up, as you say they do, how do you even know if the courts are actually biased still? Because the data proves it, court order and training a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:15 AM
1

This entire paragraph is bunk and proves nothing. One cultural phenomenon in an unpopular sport is irrelevant. Especially given that it's a largely masculine sport, (fighting) and so anyone who's good at it is obviously considered masculine. Genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 06:01 AM
1

You argument genuinely boils down to this: "10% of marriages have female breadwinners, and of that 10%, half of them are marriages in which the man is retired or disabled (yes that is what the data says you're actually just fabricating the idea that it doesn't) And of that other half where the women are the breadwinners it's possible that the men on average MIGHT not be doing as much housework as the women are but we don't actually know because the data includes nearly 50% rate of men who are fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:59 AM
1

Why are you so rude and combative? I literally did math to prove the near statistical certainty that you are lying. Not that it matters but I'm not from America, and out earning your husband is very common here because we aren't backwards There is no country on earth where that is common. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you'd realize that liberal, high earning woman are overrepresented on Reddit. No, low IQ lying femcels are overrepresented. And even among liberal high earning co…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:53 AM
1

Well but that’s not the topic of the post or the study, is it? The topic of the post is unrelated to your incorrect presumptive comments about men in women lead breadwinner marriages not doing their part in the labor. From my own perspective based on experiences from a different country I could tell you why they stay together, but I am not sure it would be right to extrapolate that to a different society. Completely irrelevant and unhelpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:49 AM
1

Sure, poor things, this is more like speculation from your part but whatever. Incorrect. It is a statistical fact that in 66% of marriages where the woman makes more than the man, the man is disabled or retired. What about wife primary earner marriages? The MINORITY of the MINORITY. They have the largest combined income, so the man is still working. Yet he’s not doing more chores or childcare like the woman does when the husband is primary… You have 0 data that proves this and you're likely ass …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:47 AM
1

This is way more reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:45 AM
1

It would prove that your claim of making more than your SO has a higher chance of divorce brainlet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 05:44 AM
1

Not gonna waste my time citing the fact that women who make more than men have higher divorce rates genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 04:47 AM
1

The data I cited which shows you are statistically unlikely to either achieve the occupation you so desperately desire, or that if you do achieve it you're very likely to get divorced. And divorced women have a really low rate of getting remarried.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 03:15 AM
1

Men have a far easier time getting long term relationships and marriage than women do. Women have to compete against that which is why their mate competition is far more fierce. Truly being a woman has advantages only insofar as how many people see you as a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:47 AM
–

You're disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:42 AM
1

You don’t have to believe me. Funnily enough, my self worth doesn’t come from your approval. Very normal response when people are being deceitful. But I do know how much I make and I do know how much he makes. No, we’re not married but we are engaged, live together, he’s my POA and the beneficiary on all my accounts so it’s not Iike we’re 6mo in and not in a legally binding relationship. Of the very rare cases where this is actually the case, they usually end up in divorce. I bet if you spent mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:27 AM
1

Ok so you didn’t understand my point. That’s cool, lemme slow it down for you. False. You mistakenly made the assumption that I said "ALL JOBS THAT MAKE MORE MONEY THAN OTHER JOBS ARE IMMEDIATELY HARDER BECAUSE THEY MAKE MORE MONEY' When in reality, anyone who's not strawmanning me would instantly know that I am clearly stating that as a general rule, higher paying jobs are more difficult. We’re not talking about what the hardest job on the planet is. I never said I was talking about what is the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:11 AM
1

Probably the 4th time I've seen this claim on this post, with the odds of that being the case in real life being a mere 3.68% of the time in a marriage, with only 25% of adult women being married (probably a much smaller number for reddit women, I'd bet only 5% of them are married) that comes out to the odds of a woman being the sole breadwinner in a marriage as 0.92% of the time. And on this post with comments from, let's say 100 women (probably wayyyyy less than that) The odds of me seeing 4 c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:53 AM
0

I was an infantry marine. You're not gonna ever tell me it's hard to be a cop. You have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:49 AM
-5

You're offended by data that destroys your worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:48 AM
-4

No I'm just reciting data.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:44 AM
1

As long as you're doing what he tells you he might not leave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:43 AM
-1

Nobody knows what you're saying or cares because it isn't even a cohesive comment. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:40 AM
4

It most certainly doesn't automatically "warrant" having a partner that does more chores. If you make 4x your partners income and they don't think they should being doing more around the house, they're mentally ill. It warrants a lot unless you're a piece of shit. You should explicitly state whilst dating that you're expecting this dynamic so that people can make an informed choice about whether that's something they want. According to all data on the topic the entire world of women agree they'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:39 AM
2

Only if the less-earner agrees to that set up. If they don’t, you’re just being a dick If they don't, they have serious and severe self importance issues and don't deserve to be in a relationship at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 01:25 AM
1

Probably the 4th time I've seen this claim on this post, with the odds of that being the case in real life being a mere 3.68% of the time in a marriage, with only 25% of adult women being married (probably a much smaller number for reddit women, I'd bet only 5% of them are married) that comes out to the odds of a woman being the sole breadwinner in a marriage as 0.92% of the time. And on this post with comments from, let's say 100 women (probably wayyyyy less than that) The odds of me seeing 4 c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 11:11 PM
-2

Men dont give a fuck what you make. So of course he expects you to do house hold labor. You're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:53 PM
5

Having a job that pays you more doesn’t earn you more fuck around time. It doesn’t make your adult responsibilities less It does all of those things. You have absolutely no understanding of reality if you think otherwise. It doesn’t mean you’re paying your partner for her domestic input. Yes it does. What a stupid thing to say. Abhorrent levels of delusion to make this claim. YOU THINK 200K DOLLARS PER YEAR, GIVING SOMEONE A MASSIVE HOME, VEHICLE, PAYING ALL OF THEIR BILLS, HAVING MORE THAN ENOU…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:52 PM
0

The fact that you make more money doesn’t mean you work harder, it just means you get paid more. Usually because you have more difficult work that you're more highly qualified for which required you to do something far more challenging in your life than your partner. Also keeping in mind that the 200k earner accounts for 4x of the lifestyle capacity of the other partner as though it's equal in any way shape or form what they're providing. Entirely defeating your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:46 PM
-5

Pretty statistically high chance that either you fail to become whatever occupation you're supposed to become one day, or you get divorced if you do become it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:44 PM
-2

I highly recommend you read more into mental load Can you scream that you're a privileged narcissistic spoiled child any louder? https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2018/12/19/fatal-employment-men-10-times-more-likely-than-women-to-be-killed-at-work/ Men are 10x more likely to be killed at work. Work 90% of all dangerous positions. Account for the vast majority of severely mentally taxing jobs like police, firefighters and military. The majority of the time female occupations are something …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:42 PM
0

I am also stating how stay-at-home husbands have it a lot better than stay-at-home wives, Being 10 years from death and vilified by evil women like yourself sure does sound great!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:31 PM
1

Ok, but how does it not make sense to compare the two? It doesnt make sense to compare the 2 for a multitude of reasons. First of all, majority of the time when a woman is the breadwinner, it's actually because her husband is retired (pension), disabled (war, dangerous jobs etc), old and dying (because women date up in age AND men die sooner due to biology). So making comparisons in the MINORITY where women are the breadwinners, when MOST OF THE TIME it's only because the men have already paid t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:30 PM
1

The default assumption is 50/50 today. This is not 1960. In 50% of cases, the parents "agree" that the mother should have primary custody. 80% of all custodial parents are mothers. On average, female parents are granted custody in court of law 65% of the time over the male parents who are granted custody only 35% of the time. This is the data regarding court decisions. DESPITE the fact that male single parents are shown across all data to be BETTER parents on average. https://psycnet.apa.org/rec…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:57 PM
1

You still have no argument and therefore this comment is entirely invalid and to be dismissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:52 AM
1

"You have utterly destroyed every poorly constructed argument I ever had, destroyed my world view and I have no valid responses so I will instead say the only thing that will allow me to leave this conversation without having to acknowledge reality and the fact that I'm so blatantly wrong it probably has terrible implications about my own intelligence."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 07:50 AM
-4

why is it a bad thing, when masculine traits are regarded as much more practical and superior? Regarding as /= superior fundamentally. Also, that's probably not true. There's no evidence masculinity is widely regarded as superior, in fact there's ample evidence of the opposite given that: Our society has created terms that exist in our legal institutions and education systems which demoralize and degrade masculinity. Patriarchy and toxic masculinity are 2 such terms. These types of terms do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 04:37 AM
0

Baseless incorrect statement ignoring reality and implying something entirely false.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:12 AM
0

You’re not being hired because you’re not up to scratch. Men are better laborers on average and still less likely to be hired when equally qualified. Affirmative action means people who aren’t middle class white men need to be considered for the first time ever, and because middle class white men suddenly have to occasionally do more than just turn up, they’re fussing about it. Incorrect. White men, and Asian men for that matter, are overwhelmingly the most qualified as a general rule for most f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:11 AM
1

But we’re comparing men to women, not fussing about absolute rates. The rate of women creating businesses is wildly lower than men creating businesses. Again, men take more risks when they are unsure of success. No, you're saying men are more likely to take risk than women and therefore it is out of character for men to not seek custody through legal action after having it unrightfully assumed that they shouldn't have custody. Your logic is flawed because it ignores the fact that men do chase cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:57 AM
3

Being assumed to be the diversity hire Being assumed as a diversity hire is not as bad as not being hired because you're not a woman. and having to work twice as hard to be considered half as good because of the innate bias of men? Women have an in-group out-group bias against men, not the other way around. And also, the women are wonderful effect. Both of these phenomenon eliminate whatever idea of a bias you THINK men have against you. To have my medical symptoms ignored or considered psycholo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 09:16 AM
2

This is just objectively wrong. In practice appearance hypergamy is WAY more common for men to date up in looks than vice versa. I don't know how you could possibly claim otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:41 PM
1

Lies, on a catastrophic level. You open up with a lie that I claimed (and built my argument around the claim) that most (majority of) women don't want to be approached. That's not how I opened my statement at all and therefore this paragraph is immediately thrown out. Repeating the same stupid does not make you seem smart. There is no argument here and this sentence is therefore bunk and dismissed. .... (facetable) There is no argument here and therefore this statement is bunk and dismissed. Not…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:41 PM
1

This contradicts male behavior in other arenas, where men are much more likely to take risks and push for things they’re not sure they’re likely to win. You're coping for your life. To completely and utterly destroy this deluded argument, simply look at rates of men creating businesses. Low. For example, in applying for jobs, it’s women who tend to apply only when they fit 90+% of the job description, while men tend to be much more likely to apply with they meet only 60% of the job description. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:35 PM
6

What's disgusting about that lol you sound like a woman everything's disgusting to them, man wants to date younger attractive women and their like "omg that's so disgusting" This paragraph actually, hilariously, demonstrates that you do largely have a negative opinion of women and therefore defeats your entire argument. Lol. I don't know what the mean average is and neither do you Yes I do. That's just cope to blame algorithims. No its isnt. Women shaped that idea not social media Social media a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:04 AM
3

How attractive they are physically in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:01 AM
5

Disprove hypergamy then. My argument is stats for immigrant marriages. Usually 80% of marriages between local-immigrant is where woman is immigrant(therefore lower status). Women marry up in terms of economic status, and intelligence generally yes. However men also are willing to marry up in terms of intelligence they just care about it more. In reality, women are "hypergamous" only in SOME things and so are men. Men for example are far more hypergamous than women when it comes to appearance. Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:00 AM
1

Both of those sentences are present within this comment by you. You are a liar. Why should I, or anyone, take you seriously? A strawman is when someone incorrectly characterizes your argument. I have never done this to you, but you have done it multiple times. Therefore this paragraph is bunk and dismissed. I never made the statement that you made the statement that 2% is irrelevant; merely that it "isn't important". You are a liar. Why should I, or anyone, take you seriously? This is semantics.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:24 AM
3

No, it is true dark triad men have more sexual partners. It's also true they have lower quality sexual partners, as do the majority of those who have many sexual partners in western society. Largely, poorer and uglier people have more unstable relationships which necessarily results in more net partners. But overwhelmingly, selflessness, mutual reciprocity, and friendliness are seen as more attractive characteristics by women, especially for long term mating. (Which women consistently show to ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:15 AM
5

Most secretaries and receptionists are women. Women do most of the household paperwork Which proves that your initial claim doesn't hold up to scrutiny... Men win custody more actually, but it's usually settled before it comes to that because they don't want their children. Selection bias for men who take the cases they think they have a high likelihood of winning and have the money to pay for legal representation. Nice try though. 27 states still presume female custody in divorce court. Divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:02 AM
1

For the same reason 2% of men raising children that aren't theirs isn't important to you. Either "2%" is a lot, or it isn't. YOU cannot have it both ways. Which is it? False claim. I never made the statement that 2% of something is irrelevant. Merely that it may be less relevant than other more pressing things. Therefore this paragraph is utterly bunk and totally dismantled. (This is generously putting aside my proof that m/f disparity in AD usage is not evidence of m/f disparity in depression i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 08:18 AM
14

This is genuinely one of the dumbest things I've ever heard in my life. I think it's because it requires beaurocracy and paperwork to start a divorce and women are more likely to do that task and count as initiating even if the other person or both started it. Most accountants are men. Women lose out more from divorce on average. No, they have worse outcomes down the line. They still have unfair rates of winning custody, getting more than their fair share of liquidity and property.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:53 AM
1

This is insulting. You may rewrite your comment and tap me once you're done; this is not going to work. You are showing the levels of DGAF that should not be possible. Additionally I need clarifications. You reply to a 2 day old comment and think I'll remember every minute detail and then have a pathological episode when I don't as though it even remotely impacts the outcome of the conversation, which has just now divulged into you being angry and name calling hilariously enough. What? I did not…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:45 AM
1

I dont think an example is necessary. Just pretend it's possible and then answer the question duly. This is merely a thought expirement. It doesn't have to reflect reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:14 AM
2

That's not what I asked you. Youre not giving a response because you know the concept would destroy your entire worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:03 AM
2

But if the science that comes out does something to essentially prove something sexist or anti-trans, will you still support it? That is if it's quality literature.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:55 AM
4

That's so true. Men hate women and always have. Soon enough women won't have any rights and will be sold as slave cattle.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:42 AM
9

Red pill is about understanding women not shaming them The redpill concept of a woman is pretty shameful though. 80/20 rule is pretty gross for example. And leads to Alpha fuxx/beta buxx rule. Which is disgusting. Which leads to Hypergamy/gold digger rule. Which is shameful as well. Also you have the "dark triad" rule which is just equally as disgusting. I mean, overall the redpills claims about how women act and are is downright insulting and shameful. And wrong. Most importantly it's wrong. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:39 AM
1

I am in my right to make affirmative statements. Yes you are. But your original statement is false and therefore so is your whole post. Source never compares men to women who want to be approached, men to women who approach, men to women who report an approach to authorities, Doesn't matter at all. Nobody is making claims about relative disability to be approached compared to the other gender. I'm merely proving with data that your claim that most women don't want to be approached is false. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 06:11 AM
1

They go to those dressed normally lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:30 AM
1

"I didn't read the study, I also have absolutely no idea how to read the study for free and so I'm gonna make a reason up to claim it's wrong so I can feel better about myself."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 05:28 AM
1

You can't individually prevent or allow taxation so it's not a moral concern on your part. We as a people elect our representatives which decide these things. Under your definition of goodness, you have already therefore admitted that most people are not good. Ethics only concerns that which is within our choice. The government.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:39 AM
1

Ok so you're against taxes, and especially all forms of welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 10:42 AM
1

We should all think of ourselves as good people at least potentially (if not actually) and strive to be good, to treat others well and fairly, to live respectable lives as far as possible. Are you willing to talk further about what this means? For example. Is it good to force someone to give you their money at gun point?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:21 AM
1

It depends largely on the person. Some people show their age, some don't. I'm well aware. My sister is 38, and looks significantly younger than she did when she was 28. And is consistently getting better looking with age. I never said exceptions don't exist, I'm merely stating that in most cases an older woman is less attractive than she used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:19 AM
1

Why? I don't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:17 AM
1

Then argument invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:16 AM
1

No. I prefaced that most women are unhealthy and that's why you can tell the difference. You're clearly the same relative bodyweight in these photos and Asian as well, asians being the longest lived ethnic group. I never claimed I can tell the difference in age for ALL women. Just most NORMAL women. Normal means fat and unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:15 AM
1

Yes, you have a bare minimum of standards you want met for a partner. So does everyone. And yet everyone still prefers to be in a relationship except in very rare cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:12 AM
2

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-013-9472-5 "In levels, we find a significant single-mother happiness deficit compared to other groups. This deficit is explained by being single, with the happiness of single mothers statistically indistinguishable from single women without children. Over time, however, the deficit has shrunk relative to all other groups except married mothers." There's tons of literature on this topic. Asking for a source is so dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:11 AM
2

Notice his neck and traps are small compared to his body. Generally, that means they didn't recieve much stimulus from training. Why? The "yoke", as it's often called, is responsible for a very large portion of male attractiveness and generally is developed through some type of load bearing more so than through full ROM hypertrophy style training. (Not to say it can't be developed like this, because it can but most people aren't doing neck curls and scapula shrugs.) Given the comparative size of…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:02 AM
2

90% of American women are unhealthy, DO GAIN WEIGHT BETWEEN THESE AGES (entirely defeating your point), and age relatively quickly as a result. I can easily see the differences facially between a 23 year old and 30 year old woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:57 AM
1

Women do go though - you just personally don’t see Pilates, or cycling as real workouts. You’re literally ignoring it out of choice. I dont because they're not. I'm not gonna entertain this idea, literally only casuals and unfit people have this belief. I have been deep into fitness and health for 10 years at this point. I'm an elite athlete, and work with and hangout with other elite athletes. NOBODY WHOS SERIOUS ABOUT TRAINING THINKS PILATES IS LEGIT. Please show me some studies that say class…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:42 AM
-2

Dont think this post is gonna reach its target audience. Attractive women don't exist on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 06:43 AM
3

You'll also note, that the lowest use is amongst truly single individuals - people who've never married. Not according to most data sets. Single women use antidepressants more than married, especially as they age. Also, single women are less happy and more likely to be mentally ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:58 AM
-2

We all can. Stop with this nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:54 AM
1

my original comment was that women's only gyms close down because women don't go to women's only gyms. In no way have I moved the goalposts. You tried to move it just now by referencing data about health clubs as proof that women account for a massive portion of gym revenue and therefore aren't the reason women's only gyms can't succeed. Women go to gym for socialization, or to get looked at. By and large. Point blank period.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:40 AM
2

Build muscle to fix skull shape ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:36 AM
6

No gym for your face, there is also the fact that you need to wear a shirt IRL so no one would see how lean you are False. Since I started lifting I've gained about 45-50lbs of muscle. Of straight lean tissue. My face used to look like Phineas from Phineas and Ferb. Now it looks like Jeremy Renner. The muscle gain added significant contractile tissue to my face, and expanded my lower jaw size as a result which literally caused my face to become symmetrical horizontally and have a proper ratio ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:36 AM
6

Men are taught they need to do dozens of different things if they want to earn the love of a woman. Women are taught they need to cook, clean, provide good sex, suck dick, learn how to draw all over their face, stay unheathily thin, and wear uncomfortable skin tight clothes to attract a man. Women are practically never told what to do if they want to earn the love of a man False.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:27 AM
1

You'd love to get married. Case closed on your original, and incorrect comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:23 AM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:22 AM
1

No, that's if you include "health clubs" which are different beasts than what this conversation is about. We're talking about serious lifters and female only gyms. Health clubs by and large are studio focused with tons of amenities and a much more active work force in the environment. In other words, they're much more highly social and bias towards women. Places like orange theory or what have you. And, again, they focus on the casual female experience and socialization. In GYMS (places like LA …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:21 AM
1

You've never seen those gendered survival shows have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:17 AM
0

I really don't see the problem with using polling data for finding out information that can only be gathered via surveys. This method is quite literally no different than what pew does when they send out surveys either by mail or calling random homes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:16 AM
1

What's the name of it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:59 AM
0

Pretty much reinforces my point even more. As it stands to perfect reason that even amongst the 23% of younger women who don't want to be approached, majority of them are probably already taken. Meaning that it's likely that we'll over 90% of women desire to be approached, and yet only 16% are approached more than once a year
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:58 AM
1

You literally said women only gyms fail and that women don’t go to them. Which is true. If that were the case, people wouldn’t be making a ton on money starting gyms and such the cater mostly to women. The business model isn't catering to women. It's this: create a gym with proper equipment. Men flock to the gym to lift weights and get strong. They become a constant revenue stream. Upon men flocking to the gym, women then flock to the gym to get leered at wearing no clothes. After awhile of wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:53 AM
1

That's a "women's only" gym (nationwide franchise). No woman who's serious about lifting is going to go there. And as I've already explained, most females are not serious about lifting, even including the ones who go to the gym If there were a "women's only" gym with the same equipment as in a regular gym, I'd happily pay twice the monthly dues! maybe you would, because you're clearly misandrinistic and that's what happens to miserable people who have immediate negative bias towards large groups…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:37 AM
1

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022022100031004001 Peer reviewed, cross cultural across 42 nations it was concluded that married people of both genders are happier and less mentally ill than divorced and separated people. Culture evidently playing a very minor role across the board. US based, and accounting for more than what you mentioned. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053535705001745?via%3Dihub "Potential, as well as actual, division of labor seems to co…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:05 AM
1

Also you might wanna learn to chill out. There’s no need to be so dramatic. On reddit. This is the most low stakes environment ever made. If you think this is dramatic, then life is gonna be a wild ride for you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:32 AM
1

I'll see your opinion piece, book sales advertisement, and no citations with 1 peer reviewed study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495 P value (not that you know what that is) of of depression association of single women is .28 for younger ones and .17 for older ones. Seriously, you're deluded if you think single women are happier. Every piece of scientific literature says they're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:50 AM
1

I didnt link any data showing single women were more miserable, because I didn't think anyone was stupid enough to think otherwise. Single women are almost uniformly the most depressed of ANY group of women. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000495 Here's a study showing the P value of at least young single women's depressive symptoms is .28. Which is super fucking high. Are you really gonna sit here and play this stupid game with me? Should it be surprising to ANYONE …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:47 AM
7

In layman's terms, it is a relatively accurate generalization to say that men love women, but women don't love men (as much). This is an affirmative statement. It's not true. I'll expand, but essentially your entire posts pretense is false, which makes the rest irrelevant. When women explain why they don't like being approached by strangers, Another incorrect affirmative statement. Most women want to be approached. https://datepsychology.com/risk-aversion-and-dating/ '74% of women aged 25 and be…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 08:05 AM
1

If you're not turned off by both, you have issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:12 AM
1

This is pure delusion. Telling anyone that you want to have kids with them and you're not in a serious relationship or on the path to one, is extremely gross, weird, and questionable. Anyone who says otherwise is unironically literally mentally ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 07:12 AM
1

Take men away and I bet a lot of the violence men claim they protect women from would also reduce by a fuckton if not completely. A maleless society would result in an immediate massive War of women trying to take the reigns of power and resources to fill the power vacuum. Most likely women would kill eachother in droves, especially for access to the most precious resource that would be left on the earth at the time (sperm banks) and society would quickly have serious problems and may fundamenta…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:58 AM
1

And that's why you're deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:26 AM
1

No they don't. I've been to many churches. They have kids and women's groups. They never have men's groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:25 AM
1

Was
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:24 AM
1

I have been approved for mortgages left and right when I was only making 50ishk a year
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:24 AM
1

Are you under the impression that you can have children without sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:23 AM
1

Because every living beings primary biological imperative is mate selection and reproduction. All existing literature shows single people aren't as well of as those in relationships. In every facet of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:22 AM
1

That's what you said isn't true, weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:20 AM
1

Taxation is by definition armed robbery.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:20 AM
1

Women prefer to be in relationships according to all the data we have. Only women who CANT be in one are the ones who cope with it by becoming cat ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:19 AM
1

You ignored the data and only looked at the correlation conjecture like it in any way supports anything you've said. Women who get divorced or aren't re partnered are more depressed than women who stay married and women who repartner. End of nonsensical goal post shifting discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:18 AM
1

You're tiny and I'm bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:15 AM
1

If it's "weird as hell" then there is no argument you have against what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:10 AM
1

Yes, but that's actually because most people are dumb. It doesn't change any of what I said, and it's the main reason the pareto principle exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:09 AM
1

Upon inspecting the website, they're clearly low impact and low intensity AND low time. 30 minutes. Of circuit cardio, doing the typical female "I want to avoid having to actually train" nonsense. Seriously, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:08 AM
1

If you were teaching a HIIT class and people were talking I hate to say it but that says more about your teaching method than the classes themselves. People put in as much effort as they WANT in commercialized fitness classes. I get it, you guys are redditors and think anything putting you at 140 HR I'd "challenging" and means you "can't speak" But in reality, you don't know what you don't know and you will never know, because you've never been. Women only gyms exist and thrive. Affirmative inco…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:03 AM
1

Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:58 AM
1

Because it's indirectly a statement of desiring sex that is "designed" to make you feel more attracted to the person. I put quotations because only a reddit femcel would ever appreciate that comment in person. Most women would be put off, because most women are desperate fiends and losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:56 AM
1

Someone wanting to raise a family with you solely off of appearance is insulting for obvious reasons silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:52 AM
5

You did not used to teach Pilates or cycle and say it’s not for working out. Yeah I did. And HIIT and much more. And they are extremely successful: maybe not in the town you’re in. But there are tons of gyms that have women only days and classes that are extremely popular and successful. Simply not true. And imma be real with you: most people that go to traditional gyms, male or female are not thinking about ventilator thresholds. Most people, male or female, are going to the gym just to maintai…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:15 PM
3

Youre just slightly chonkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:14 PM
1

So youre really tall and very heavy. And want me to think people ogle you. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:10 PM
1

Insecurity laugh
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:03 PM
1

You're insecure. Mines bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:01 PM
1

Mine is bigger than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:58 AM
2

What's your height and weight
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:57 AM
7

Have you ever been to a Pilates or cycle bar class? They are not for socializing they are for working out. I'm a sports scientist, and spent years as a PT. I used to teach these classes. Only someone who is a hard-core casual in the gym would ever make this stupid claim. They are for socializing. Most of the time during these classes the participants are at zone 2 of their ventilators threshold. And talking. But they are a type of gym where men do not usually go, and they make great money and ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:57 AM
5

"I don't get DMs b-b-b-b-but it's because my IG isn't public!" "Well, I can't prove it but in public I get UNDRESSED BY EVERY MANS EYES!!!" You're something else lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:52 AM
1

https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/what-are-the-dimensions-of-the-average-sex-toy Average dildos sales were 5-6 inches length and girth 4-5 inches. That's also whole considering the consumer bias of people who would purchase sex toys would be more likely to prefer a larger one. That said, data also shows that women prefer 6.5 inch penises on average above any other length.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:51 AM
3

Show me your Instagram DMs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:47 AM
2

And i've explained that they don't contain the same message. Youre wrong. You've also flip-flopped between whether or not they contain the same message. False. Like i said, i'll use simpler English for you in future. If you know a native speaker, they can explain the subtle difference to you. Your entire comment had 0 arguments or relevant dialogue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:39 AM
1

This is because they're usually reluctant to abandon their kids when a relationship breaks up, whereas a lot of men will skate off without a backwards glance. And being saddled with kids makes it harder to do the things that lead to high-paying jobs (like pursue education or work tons of OT). You cant really say this with any backing when the current laws don't give men rights to child custody. If they did, and men still skated off then sure. But last I checked, before welfare children only had …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:37 AM
9

So because women enjoy socializing (which is why they go to class-style studios to pretend to excercise) they also must go to women's only gyms where socializing is not the main function, and where men arent allowed? Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:35 AM
6

Why go to a gym for something you can easily do at home? My gym is chock full of women (including myself) who are serious about lifting. I already answered that multiple times. Also I don't really care about your anecdotal and clearly biased opinion. The majority of commercial gyms have an over abundance of cardio equipment, and women prioritize this equipment more than men. Period. This is not up for debate. Also, why would any woman pay for a gym membership if their only goal is to be objectif…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:34 AM
6

Incorrect. The women's only gyms had machines only (no free weights, no smith machines, no cables, benches, etc.). Completely useless for anyone who's even halfway serious about lifting. This is disingenuous. The vast majority of women who go to the gym are not even remotely serious about lifting, and prefer to do long form low intensity cardio + low weight high rep "toning" work. Also, I've seen women's only gyms with free weights, which by the way is the least desired thing for women in a gym.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:03 AM
1

The fact you think that the first thing you say to someone is "our kids would be beautiful" isn't just as disrespectful is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:59 AM
1

and 6 inches looks huge. It also feels huge - we have difficulty doing some positions, Because it is huge. Humans have the largest average penis size of all primates. This whole issue is made infinitely worse by porn. Porn uses TINY women (often around 5'0), smaller men (usually around 5'6-5'8) with HUGE penises (7-8 inches) AND fish eye lens cameras that make the focal point of the scene (the penis usually) look significantly larger. In reality, even a 7-8 inch penis is unreasonably large as fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:58 AM
3

Is the meaning behind what a sentence says lost on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:46 AM
3

None of those statistics are twisted, nor do any of them refute anything I said. You sound crazy right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:42 AM
8

There's been dozens opened across the country, and they have shit equipment because they have no money cause no women go to them because women like to go to gyms with men wearing nearly no clothing g because women love getting looks and feeling sexually desirable. Welcome back to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:40 AM
3

Both are weird things to say to someone and the fact you admit they mean the same thing but you prefer how manipulative the first one is just proves my entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:39 AM
1

Then what is the point? My understanding was that it was about how two similar phrases can convey a different message despite sayig similar things. As I've already detailed, they do not convey a different message. They both 100% mean that I want to fuck you. I see what's confusing you. If you re-read the example, it actually says "I'd love to", rather than, "I want to". A subtle but significant difference. "I'd love to" suggests a more hypothetical desire, rather than something you actually plan…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:37 AM
3

Inverted U curve to all things. Don't know who Collins is, but he's stupid. Anyone who thinks you can eat 400 bananas a day is mentally ill. 1 banana contains 400mg of K. 400mg/50dl of blood=8mg/dl. 8mg/dl converted into mmol/L is 2.04. Bananas are roughly 70% bioavalaiable so 2.04x.7=1.42mmol/L. How many mmol/L to create hyperkalemia? 5mmol/L Does this mean 4 bananas is an OD? No, because kidneys filter that shit. But it does mean that everyday when you consume more than 4 bananas worth of pota…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:35 AM
4

Absolutely not. Ans also you can eat too much potassium and seriously harm yourself. Veggies are superior to bananas in general as a source of food. Veggies and red meats are the best foods as far as nutrient density that exist. Fruits are good too, and should be eaten for their own benefits. But no, they can never substitute vegetables. But kiwis come close. They're extremely nutrient dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:54 AM
1

No. It is not irrelevant. It's the entire subject of the discussion. And you've not addressed it at all. Its not and never been the point of the discussion. You completely made that up. The example actually works pretty well when you consider the fact that heterosexual men, enjoy having sex with beautifuo women. Actually one of the dumbest takes I've ever heard in my fucking life. Obviously the REASON it doesn't mean you want to have sex with his wife is because she's taken and he's your friend.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:52 AM
2

Lol. I fucking do this all the time. I have severe chronic insomnia and go on walks at this exact time like 5x a week. The odds of you being attacked in America is extremely low in general, unless you live in a super criminal area like Memphis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:50 AM
1

Actually it's because of proximity. Spend 1000 hours around 1 man you've known for 10 years vs 100 hours around random men, and it's more likely the man you've known will attack you. But if you spent 1000 hours around strange men and the same amount of time with the man you know, you're actually way more likely to be attacked by a stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:48 AM
3

CMV: The extent to which women fear stranger men is completely irrational and entirely a product of female neuroticism + media hysteria. To some degree it's not a real fear actually. It's a social tactic of virtue signaling. "Oh no complete strangers want to attack me because I'm so petite, small, or precious AND desirable!" Most women have never been attacked and never will be attacked. Most women will hit their boyfriend first, and continuously. The idea that it's a giant fear is just not true…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:46 AM
1

Denied for a mortgage making 50k? Why??
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:43 AM
2

The intent of both is sex. What comes before is entirely irrelevant and you ignoring where I already addressed this exact fact is annoying to say the least. On top of this you're arguing semantics for absolutely no reason. If you don't believe me, find two intelligent, married men you know. Tell one "your wife is beautiful", and the other, "i'd love to screw your wife". You'd be surprised how different the responses are. False equivalency. "Your wife is beautiful" /= I want to screw your wife. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:41 AM
3

Close but no cigar. Socially, liberalism (as the American kind, not classical liberalism) is extremely favorable towards women while conservatism is less favorable towards women. True. This is because women are biologically more disposed to succeeding in a free social market (women are wonderful effect, female in group bias / male outgroup bias, hypergamy and 80/20, etc), and strong social conservatism restricts the extent to which women can leverage their privilege in socializing and dating. Ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:39 AM
2

Your first sentence is about how the two are different, so you understand the difference. They're different...because they use different words. But obviously I'm saying that the intent is the same
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:27 AM
2

One is manipulative and indirect, the other is direct. Neither are flawed. Presenting one as problematic is something only a socially inept stupid person would do. Failing to recognize they're identical in function is something only an idiot would do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:13 AM
0

"I want to fuck you" "I would never SAY I want to fuck you outright!" Do you speak english?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:08 AM
1

The fact that both MEAN they want to fuck you and one of them just DOESNT SAY IT. Holy shit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:02 AM
-7

The fact the commenter can't realize these are the same things is lack of social skills, thus my comment calling her out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:53 AM
1

My girlfriend actually says all the time that she wants our kids to look like me. Blue eyes and white skin. That she only ever got with me because essentially of how I look. (Yes I had to drag this information out of her where she otherwise would have denied it)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:29 AM
-2

Are you...fucking serious??? Use your brain, this comment is utter brain rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:27 AM
0

The absolute copium I see around here of people trying to avoid this reality or pretend its not how they feel disgusts me. Redditors, if you claim you have no "breeding fetish" or you "don't see other people as useful for breeding" or care about how "attractive your children are" All you're actually saying is "I'm a fucking LIAR and a bad one at that" Everyone cares about how hot their partner is. Stop being stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:26 AM
1

Breeding is a fetish? Nah I'm pretty sure that's the most normal sexual desire that's ever existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:24 AM
-7

The fact you think these 2 statements are different at all is ludicrous. One is merely said in a less overtly sexual way. Also both are not said at all in general. This whole comment is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:23 AM
1

You won't do it because you know I'm right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:20 AM
1

Most men are not invisible, classic and easily disproven myth only a redditor would ever claim. Most men become fathers in the US and most men are quite sexually active. Men also have a far easier time getting married. Women know this and also women literally want attention from random men they don't find attractive in addition to the ones they want. They just don't want direct attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:18 AM
1

Honestly, last time I turned down sex with a woman I was raped. Well actually I have 2 relevant stories on the topic. First one: Was with my girlfriend at the time. We had already had sex an ungodly number of times in only 3 days. (3 day weekend no work.) In fact, it had been 23 times. Yes I counted it up. So time number 24 roles around. She starts touching me. I told her no, I said "hey we've already had sex a ton of times. Honestly my dick isn't even gonna work and I'm just not gonna have sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:15 AM
1

So…men who are unsuccessful or unhappy in dating because the women that they want don’t want them or they aren’t finding the kind of relationships that they want are finding other ways to achieve happiness? No they're not finding other ways to achieve happiness and neither are the women. The sooner you guys realize this shit the sooner you won't all be miserable. That’s a good thing for everyone! Welcome to the world boys! There's nothing good about men and women avoiding their main biological i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:51 AM
-5

You will feel crushed when you realize how few options you actually have, and how few men will ever be willing to committ to you. Not an insult, a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:22 AM
2

No its definitely true. Men make more and own more in America. As such they pay more in tax dollars. That said, majority of welfare recipients are women. Not to mention alimony and child support payments. (Which are government mandated programs, essentially meaning they're taxation and "wealth redistribution" which is another way of saying armed robbery.)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:21 AM
1

You just don't understand British law if you think this. In the UK speech is a crime in many ways if it is considered "hateful" Which essentially means that you can say "I hate women" and it will be considered illegal hatespeech, and then that can be considered a hate crime. (A much higher type of crime than a 800 pound fine.) You can NOT call someone a Karen and comfortably be sure you will not be arrested and prosecuted. Yes I'm serious. The UK jails literally hundreds if not thousands of peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:20 AM
10

Women only events happen because if you tried to organize the same thing for men, it would be absolutely obliterated. Boy scouts is a perfect example. Women only gyms used to open up. What happened? They all closed down because women don't go to women only gyms. Boys only events can't be created but they happen all the time. Many activities are what they are because only men go to them and they like it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:08 AM
2

Society has rapidly changed over recent years. Women used to be shamed for promiscuity, dressing slutty, being overweight and so on. In the current year, societal standards for women no longer exist on the meta level (besides agreeing with leftist ideology). Women are still shamed for all of these things, in fact with the rise of the "alt right" in popularity, its certainly the case that slut shaming and fat shaming is actually more common in 2024 than it was in 2010. Agreeing with leftist ideol…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 07:05 AM
1

If you claim you're oppressed based on an immutable characteristic, the only reason that could be true within reason would be if everyone else almost universally agreed that it were the case. However, as we can see that's not what's happening. Several people don't agree with you and even have evidence to prove how you're wrong. As such, your opinion is invalidated because it relies on a worldview in which people MUST feel negatively toward you, and yet everyone is claiming they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:18 AM
1

If you claim you're oppressed based on an immutable characteristic, the only reason that could be true within reason would be if everyone else almost universally agreed that it were the case. However, as we can see that's not what's happening. Several people don't agree with you and even have evidence to prove how you're wrong. As such, your opinion is invalidated because it relies on a worldview in which people MUST feel negatively toward you, and yet everyone is claiming they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:18 AM
1

If you claim you're oppressed based on an immutable characteristic, the only reason that could be true within reason would be if everyone else almost universally agreed that it were the case. However, as we can see that's not what's happening. Several people don't agree with you and even have evidence to prove how you're wrong. As such, your opinion is invalidated because it relies on a worldview in which people MUST feel negatively toward you, and yet everyone is claiming they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:18 AM
1

If you claim you're oppressed based on an immutable characteristic, the only reason that could be true within reason would be if everyone else almost universally agreed that it were the case. However, as we can see that's not what's happening. Several people don't agree with you and even have evidence to prove how you're wrong. As such, your opinion is invalidated because it relies on a worldview in which people MUST feel negatively toward you, and yet everyone is claiming they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:17 AM
–

I'm not exactly sure why that is, though. The perfect "chad" never has to learn game or worry about pills. The reason is obvious. The scientific literature shows uniformly that White people have it easiest in the dating world. Dating obsession stems from lack of success. So it's more likely for a minority group to be involved on dating obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 10:43 AM
–

White guys also tend to ignorantly obsess over the size of black guys' dicks White men have larger penises than black men on average, and porn is the only place where the idea that black penis size is big exists. Porn addiction is more common in black men than white men. You are projecting. Let's try and be objective for 2 seconds instead of this nonsense. The real reason black women have less dating success (with EVERY race, including their own) is because they're simply not as attractive on av…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 10:40 AM
–

You refuse to acknowledge reality and that's sad for you. You don't even know what racism is because you're so lacking in knowledge on what race is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 10:30 AM
–

There's a ton wrong with this post, so prepare yourself "6'6 Croatian aggressive kickboxer" which describes Black Women as some unbearable, undesirable Woman and over masculine woman. Statistically they are among the least desired race of women, along with Indian women and Samoan women. It's not a "trend" it's a simple reality. I don't care who is offended by this. Furthermore, "black people" is a general umbrella term. In reality, 95% of the time when people say "black people" they're referring…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 10:23 AM
–

This kind of reminds me of dealing with my girlfriend. I recently hit the peak of my bulk, 180lbs at about 17% bodyfat. Felt very insecure about how chonkers I look, and was super excited to cut down again to about 12%. My girlfriend got kind of aggressive with asking me to not lose more than 2 inches on my waist because my current bulked state was "peak male body" in her eyes, even though I felt like I looked like absolute garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 06:09 AM
–

The average man doesn't make 50-60k a year, but even if he did The average man is literally 50lbs overweight. Unhealthy, gross to look at slobs with 400ng/dl testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 06:05 AM
–

But if you mean Alex “the frogs are gay” Jones… no thanks. He's on video predicting 9/11 to be a product of the CIA and bin laden a month before it happened. He's on video predicting the exact month the Russians would invade the ukraine. He's on video predicting the outcoming of evidence that proves fluoride and estrogen in our water supplies cause infertility and homosexuality in many different species including frogs and humans. He's on video predicting the outcoming of evidence that proves en…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:50 AM
1

Reality is that not getting attention from women isn't equivalent to starvation or terrible diseases and it is extremely dramatic to treat it as such Yes. Yes it is. The fact you think otherwise is absolutely devoid of understanding reality. You are talking about denying a living being it's only function. I already went into great detail on this, you're outright denying reality. If you faced rejection from everyone in your life YOU WOULD KILL YOURSELF. This is NOT a question. It is a FACT. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:38 AM
0

And it invalidates your entire perspective that I feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:35 AM
2

Yeah, for example being born extremely short, with facial deformities, or just being an Indian guy. These are all "wrong" with someone? No, they're not "wrong" they're just genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:34 AM
-2

It doesnt count if you're ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:38 PM
–

No I'm just successful in the dating world, unlike you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:29 PM
–

I have a girlfriend of 4 months and was dating a large number of women simultaneously before her. The benefit of Blackpill: it actually fucking works.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:11 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:07 PM
5

Yes, but I also got approached in public to get told I look like a variety of different male celebrities and sometimes complimented on my appearance, and I have been asked out several times in person by women that I both know and practically cold approached me. I would say it was happening a few times a month before I got into a relationship. I also get DMs on instagram from random women about once a week, and I had a couple times where a woman literally asked me to have sex with her when we had…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 10:31 AM
7

Black pill is simply the belief that your physical appearance accounts for the vast majority of your SMV. And it fucking does. I really want to stress this. I used to be 120lbs, chunky, 5'7, deformed severely underdeveloped jawline, lopsided asymmetrical face, long hippie hair, wearing baggy stained clothes. Over the course of several YEARS I worked my ass off to change this. I'm now 175lbs lean, same height but I wear lifts that essentially make me 5'9, gained so much muscle that it makes my ja…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 10:13 AM
3

I'm one of them. Former blue pill, turned redpill, turned black pill. Blue pill got me 0 dates from any women. Redpill got me some dates and sex, very little success with ltr. (You can't spit game 24/7, and even if you could it's just another way of being manipulative. That's just called being a sociopath, and game is 90% about lying anyway) Blackpill got me a 10/10 gf, got women approaching me, got me unlimited access to sex, and allows me to actually be myself and still be sexually successful …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:40 AM
3

The fact you think LGBTs and "melinated" people are disadvantaged is fucking hilarious. Our society literally legally mandates that they have extra privileges and rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:18 AM
1

Your test includes shit like "what gender identity and sexuality, and skin color are you" as though those things in any way make you disadvantaged in western society. They don't. They give you advantages. Try living in reality next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:09 AM
1

Rejection by every human you ever meet in your entire life and a life of constant negative social reactions, insults and beratement vs not being able to eat peanuts. Are you living in reality? If nobody wanted to sleep with you EVER you'd kill yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:34 AM
11

The primary biological imperative of all human life forms is reproduction, except for in extremely rare cases. To the point that the vast majority of all humans who CAN become parents, will become parents. Life in general is literally pointless without the capacity for reproduction as it is the only thing that propagates continuous life. "Life threatening conditions" vs conditions that threaten to end entire bloodlines, species, life itself. Your comment is so devoid of understanding reality it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:28 AM
4

Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:21 AM
1

The market has been far freer in the past and is currently unbelievably restrictive. Have you ever even owned a business? Taxes alone make profit margins literally impossible for certain types of small businesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:21 AM
–

Women initiate and conduct more domestic violence than men against their partners. You're in a fantasy world.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:19 AM
–

Women are inherently valuable, while men are inherently disposable. The only context in which this statement is true, is in the context where we are saying women are inherently valuable based on ability to bear children, and men arent based on their inability to bear children. If that is the case then we must acknowledge that women who can't or don't have children are not valuable, in fact they are less valuable than men. But nobody is making that claim. Why? Because the original affirmative sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:32 AM
4

We were the ones that were oppressed, Women have not been historically more oppressed than men, since I know that's what you're trying to imply. we were the ones that didn't have the right to vote Throughout the overwhelming majority of history, neither men or women had the right to vote. When men (only a small minority of men) DID have the right to vote, it's because they fought and died for it. Any time women ever got the right to vote, it was because men GAVE it to them. we were the ones who …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:05 AM
5

Most women care infinite amounts about their appearance and attracting a mate. Welcome to reality redditor.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 05:56 AM
2

Predicting the future of human cultural behaviors based on trends is notoriously, wildly inaccurate. Tell that to Thomas Sowell and Alex jones
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:06 PM
0

I...don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 10:54 PM
0

"Updawg"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 08:43 PM
6

How come we see so many women complaining about men not committing and then we have a large portion of men saying they can't get any matches on dating apps? It doesn't make sense to me. I just can't see how the 80/20 rule is not true. I see so much of it occurring in real life and online. Men are far more likely to use dating apps for sex and women are far more likely to use them for LTR. As such there is a disparity in user base. Have you ever actually looked at a woman's dating app matches bef…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 07:10 PM
1

Most self defeating comment of 2024 award goes to you! Good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:56 PM
2

so while statistics can give insight to some behaviors, it will never show the full picture. ...and that's precisely why you have to observe the entire body of literature before saying stupid stuff, such as "you can find any study to support your position!" Which is both an affirmative statement, and a false statement. 2 things I hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 06:55 PM
2

I've had to say this so many times. I'll say it again, even though the incels and femcels in this sub refuse to accept it. Do we want women? Absolutely. But marriage? Meh.. Not really tbh. Meanwhile the female coworkers are the opposite. Do they want to deal with men? No. But do they want marriage? You betcha. Every month it seems one of them is talking about how they wanna get married but can't find a man. Women gate keep sex. Men gatekeep relationships and especially marriage. Women demand you…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:43 PM
1

Then maybe you shouldn't speak on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:51 PM
1

Have you ever been sexually rejected or sexually rejected a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:46 PM
1

Yeah, not able to be described, located, measured, or quantified. Almost like it's psychological and/or subjective. Physical structure that's been identified in 63% of women at least. Grow up dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:18 PM
0

Only a deluded person would ever say that. Sexually rejected women are extremely toxic and angry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:17 PM
1

You're actually lost. "Unproved" in scientific literature means "not able to be described" It does not mean that it doesn't exist, genius. And as the same paragraph shows, they are in agreement that it does exist. Ironically enough, the whole conversation is fucking stupid. If you have 1 study that shows it exists in 60% of women, and another that shows it exists in 0, you've still proven it exists genius. Holy shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:08 AM
1

Wikipedia. Impressive. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31464000/ Here's a pubmed, also there's tons of studies on this. And anyone who's ever been with a woman knows. You can literally feel exactly where it is. I feel bad for any woman who ever has to sleep with you. Absolutely useless in bed. "The findings indicate that there are reliable scientific-clinical data to support the existence of an anatomical G-spot structure."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:50 AM
2

Ok so you have no valid response. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:22 AM
1

Women staying more than men doesn’t change the fact that most wouldn’t. It's merely evidence of negotiating power discrepancy. Obviously. men being more likely to use dating apps even ones that are relationship oriented, Women are significantly more likely to use matchmaker services (paid service for actual real success rate of getting ltr, and near chance of pump and dump), and women are more likely to attend speed dating events. (Real life+social proof=lower odds of pump and dump. Term pump an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:21 AM
1

Don't get me wrong. I'm a hard-core libertarian. I totally agree with your logic. People should be allowed to deal with these things independent of government stepping in to decide what the repercussion should be for both parties after someone committs an infringement of some kind. But the obvious result is death, and that's what people are so whiny about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:59 AM
1

There’s conflicting data on this because most of it is self reported. Self reported data sure is annoying. Fortunately we have studies that ask men "Have you ever tried to cheat on your spouse and failed" and the surveys overwhelmingly show that yes, men try to cheat more, fail more, and cheat more too. Women try to cheat less, succeed more often, and cheat less overall. men don’t want relationships because they want to have sex with one person they want a relationship because they want a woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:57 AM
2

So you have no valid response. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:24 AM
–

"I live in a city so it's almost daily" "I acknowledge most people I pass with a nod." You're obviously lying. I've been to cities all over the planet. Nobody acknowledges eachother, even in large southern cities. The only people that do this are in small towns as a general rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:16 AM
–

Leave it to the egg heads to spend millions of dollars confirming shit everyone already knew, and then say they need to spend millions more for no apparent reason. Of fucking course an attacker will select who to attack based on how weak they look. Why is that a surprise? And why does it need to be "researched"? This isn't even valuable information. Most actual attackers are someone you know. Not some random dude on the street. Random acts of violence are rare and uncommon. A waste of Time to re…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:12 AM
1

You know, the other day I almost shot and killed a man for throwing a rock at my gfs car. (In game) I let him go because I didn't want to risk going to jail. I think in your system there'd be a lot more dead people.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:07 AM
4

Comment makes 0 fucking sense. For example, men recieve worse sentences for theft and partner violence universally. Yet both crimes are more commonly committed by women. It's nothing to do with what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:05 AM
-6

You do realize women as a whole act far more entitled regarding sex than men do right? Men usually want it more, but a sexually rejected woman usually reacts far more crazy than a sexually rejected man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:57 AM
-3

the men saying it want to appear wholesome and concerned about health when all they really care about is sex. This implies deliberate intentual manipulation. In reality, most men think they want hugs and affection, and then that obviously leads them towards feelings of sexual nature due to their physiology. It's not really these guys fault in many cases, they only experience emotions as they come. Also, let's not pretend sexual needs are any less legitimate than the others listed. They're just a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:56 AM
1

I'm 5'7 and, granted I'm extremely jacked and I think I'm considered pretty attractive facially, but that said based solely off the fact I'm short I shouldn't get many matches. Especially compared to some of the men I know that look far better than me but get no matches. It's all about how you trick the algorithm and use your elo. You have to swipe left on the hottest women, and swipe right only on girls you think will swipe right on you and you have to use the app sparingly. This will maximize …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:48 AM
1

Point being, there will in theory be more men in that active bucket while women can just hop on the app, set her filter to 6ft+ (or maybe 5'10+ if shes feeling charitable) and then have 3 or 5 guys lined up to date and then delete the app shortly afterwards. No, the data on the topic shows clearly that most people, including women, who use the apps never go on a date period. Most oftenly women will cite lack of safety, and being scared the men won't like her irl as the reasons why they don't act…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 11:05 AM
0

It's not actually a matter of height or looks or any of this. Not entirely. The apps are all literally designed specifically so that men cannot get matches. I know several 6ft+ absolutely jacked giga Chad's who get ZERO matches. The secret is all about how you use the app to trick the algorithm to actually show your profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 10:57 AM
1

Well the vast majority of women wouldn’t stay either. More women than men will stay in this example. That doesn’t even make sense. And I said nothing about an 80/20 rule I just said that women gate keep relationships. That is women are interested in a relationship with a smaller portion of men while men are interested in relationships with a larger portion of women. There's 0 evidence that supports this and its easily proven false by looking at the fucking relationship rates lmao. A higher perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 09:03 AM
1

Women cheat about the same rate as men and the rates are influenced by age with younger women cheating more and older women cheating less False. Men and women at younger ages cheat at the same rate. Overall men cheat almost twice as much. Men desire more women but have less opportunity to cheat women desire less men but have more opportunity to cheat. This is a retarded line of reasoning. Men engage in more sexual infidelity than women, and women engage in more emotional infidelity than men. Bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:49 AM
1

People don’t always prefer whatever Drs now consider “optimal” for one obviously many people live long healthy lives with body fat higher than 30% ( Yeah, and some people live long healthy lives while consuming excessive amounts of alcohol and cigarettes. First of all, these people are a minority. Secondly, it's not because their habit of obesity is healthy. It's merely because they have a genetic resistance to the problems it causes. also those numbers are based on large scale population data w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:29 AM
1

I was single for 10 years until I found my significant other. I was happy for awhile, but long term you simply cannot be happy single. The concept you have about the role of a relationship in your life will only leave you bitter. Youre only saying it will leave me bitter because you believe it is doomed to fail Which ultimately means this idea of fulfillment alone is a coping mechanism
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 07:38 PM
1

Dude, needing someone to be happy isnt healthy thats codependency Again this is just a defensive coping mechanism. You need Ron's of people in life to be happy. If there were no other humans, you'd never be happy. In that same vein, if you want to be fulfilled and happy; 90% of people will need a partner, a family, and friends. depending on someone else to be happy isnt a good thing. Then go live in a cave alone. Im sorry for the person that you put such a huge responsabily on. I'm sorry you don…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:49 PM
1

It's not a matter of belief, it's an absolute fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:21 PM
0

Human beings only actual purpose is reproduction. You do realize that right? Everything we do is indirectly aimed towards this purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:18 PM
1

Nobody with a working brain thinks this shit. It's literally the same as saying "some people don't want friends" and "some people don't want parents" It's stupid nonsense said to cope with a miserable reality in which they can't have what they want so they're forced to make the best of it to survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:46 AM
1

If men control sex entirety than there is even less a woman can do. Wrong. They can do more. No man will say no. But it doesn’t mean that clitoris shouldn’t be the focus when it comes to female pleasure. It’s literally what gives the best results. No point of not doing that and trying things that will be less successful or not successful at all. Nobody said to not touch your fucking clitoris lady
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:44 AM
0

But no one is being forced to be single lol, single childless women are often single and childless by choice. They're not single by choice at all. You actually believe that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:43 AM
2

"I wouldn't be happy if they died" So why the fuck would anyone be happy if they were forced to be single forever? They wouldn't. It's pure cope. Stop arguing against that fact, it's stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:38 AM
0

Yeah, I'm sure you'd be real happy if your entire family died. Wake the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:36 AM
1

Men also focus on their penises and don’t try to orgasm from nipple stimulation or balls stimulation. They focus on what feels best, which means penis stimulation. And nobody expects them to get pleasure from a different source. This is not true, and even if it were it doesn't matter because men still control sex almost entirely which negates your whole argument. And yes, sex is movement. It’s penetration, back and forth movement. No, sex is merely the act of at least 1 penetration and ejaculati…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:35 AM
1

You've been proven wrong and your reaction of a refusal to admit it perfectly demonstrates the real reason you have no dating success. It's because you're a terrible person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:33 AM
1

There is nothing wrong with average. And averege is not short. And most people don’t spend hours in bed. Never said there was something wrong with average. And I don’t usually finger myself but I probably have everything I’m supposed to have. You have no idea. I only focus on my clit because it was designed to bring me pleasure. I don’t focus on my nipples or inside of my vagina. I feel sorry for you. Sex means movement. False It’s ok if people don’t want to talk during sex. Why can’t you admit …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:22 AM
1

I'm of the opinion you can move up more than 2 points. I definitely used to be a 4 or 4.5 and am now like an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:20 AM
1

10 minutes is totally normal length. It’s not too short. Did you ignore the part where I said it's bang average? Yes. You did. And no, I don’t have any deformity. And how am I supposed to know if it’s there? I’m not a gynecologist, I don’t look into my vagina You can feel it. You're just being obtuse. If you don't feel it, you're deformed. Well, for me dirty talking is performative because I don’t feel any need to talk during sex. I would have to actively try and thing about the things to say. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:55 AM
0

This sub has taken a nose dive recently, with constant rumination on how to get sexual validation rather than how to find happiness independently. How about we start by not lying to ourselves and accepting reality? We are genetically designed and predestined to be dependent on the opposite genders validation for happiness, for very obvious fucking reasons. Anyone who isn't, has serious problems. We're a highly social primate that is one of very few species that has recreational sex for bonding. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:52 AM
1

So how long is it suppoused to take? I never said anything about how it's "supposed to be" I'm merely pointing out that you think 10-20 minutes is a long time when it's not, and how that is yet another example demonstrating your lack of sexual knowledge. get sore after ten minutes. That literally just means you're not properly lubricated, turned on, and further demonstrates everything I've been saying, especially the deformity part. I just don’t feel anything special in a place where g spot is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:46 AM
2

what the fuck does this mean? she literally said he brings her happiness. It means what I said silly boy. what more is asked of a partner? is she supposed to kill herself if they ever broke up Feeling the need to address and say "I'll be happy single" says a few things. 1 it shows lack of confidence in their ability to stay together long term, which is why she's already addressing feelings pre-emptively for when they break up 2 it shows an obvious coping mechanism for a sad reality that she feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:42 AM
1

No, it’s like 10-20 minutes, even longer. That's literally bang average and not a long time in any way shape or form. I don’t have any deformities. I go regularly to the doctor. I would know. ...not having a G spot is a deformity. I'll accept that perhaps you get no stimulation from it, but what I won't accept is that you don't have the structure at all. If you dont, you are deformed. It's not normal. Also, what about your A spot? Do you not have that too??? wonder if any dirty talking would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:35 AM
1

He lasts very long during sex so he can’t have premature ejaculation problems. I'm sure to you that's like 3 minutes. It’s normal to not orgasm from penetration. Even when I tried to masturbate putting anything inside never brought me any pleasure. Again, you probably have a deformity. I even linked data that disproves this. Until you even bother to refute that I won't entertain this argument any longer. And yes, dirty talking is cringy to me. Your example doesn’t sound sexy at all either. Not e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:08 AM
1

It’s true that many women can’t orgasm. It is normal. So I don’t know why would it mean that I have bad relationship with sex. It’s not my fault that it is the way it is. Again, I do not agree with this. And honestly, it's fucking reflected with scientific data. And I'm sick of this stupid argument. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10429993/ This entire publication pretty much proves that how attracted women are to their partner is the biggest predictor for how much they cum during s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:59 AM
1

You're wasting your time. She quite obviously doesn't even understand your argument. She also doesn't want to. She wants to be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:43 AM
1

Absolutely terrible comment, no offense. For a lot of women in marriages with kids, her DAILY efforts to the homestead probably exceed everyone’s else’s. Married mothers are most “drained” group. I was a single stay at home parent for over 1 year. The amount of effort it took to keep the house clean and take care of the kid required me to work approximately 2-4 hours per day. Anyone who says what you just said is a narcissistic scumbag. Single moms get to drop the kids off every other weekend. O…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:38 AM
1

No, I don’t have terrible relationship with sex. I just don’t feel the need to do no matter what in a slight chance that it will make a change. Most women don’t orgasm during sex no matter what. It’s normal. And it’s ok. "I don't have a terrible relationship with sex" "Most women don't orgasm from sex and it's normal and ok" You have a terrible relationship with sex. Many people think that dirty talking is cringy. Because it is. No. Many people do not think this. Again, you have a really bad rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:33 AM
-1

He brings me additional happiness but if we broke up im ok with staying single. This is just another way of saying "I'm not confident enough in my relationship to put all of my trust and faith in it, because if I did and it failed it would cause me too much pain."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:29 AM
1

No, dirty talking is cringy. I even downloaded erotic app with dirty talki where my favorite actor was saying stuff. I cringed so hard I can’t look at him anymore. It’s awful and sounds silly. So no talking. No offense, this literally just means you're a huge prude with a really high disgust factor during sex. Which is not a point of pride, it's a really bad thing. And of course I made my husband orgasm without him doing anything. I didn’t even have to try too hard. Tell me how And why wouldn’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:19 AM
2

People reach adulthood later now than they did 40 years ago. Due to economic instability, wealth inequality, and quality of life issues, people are engaging in relationships and dating less. Men have repressed sex drives because the average testosterone of a man is now about 400ng/dl (which is super unhealthy) and also ED because of excessive use of porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:14 AM
1

I doubt the average man is doing that though it’s not normal or common so probably not representative of the average man. Again, there's absolutely no reason for me to believe this logic. Just because most men don't do it, doesn't mean most men that do it are outside of the physical median. That’s actually not why. Men pay for dates because otherwise women wouldn’t go out with them. I've gone on dozens of dates without paying for shit. I've also gone on dozens of dates where women will offer to …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:10 AM
2

Health being associated with thinness is a relatively modern phenomenon though. Most humans lived and survived in food scarce environments thus holding onto fat was actually important for survival. I have a feeling your idea of "thinness" is the typical (incorrect) female idea of "thinness." Healthy bodyfat range for a woman is between 20 and 30 percent fat. This has always been the beauty standard, and has always been associated with health. Period. There’s lots of research on this having exces…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:07 AM
2

Women are more selective that’s what it shows. Also women are not less likely to cheat they actually cheat more than men in their younger years men cheat more in their older years. Women cheat less, that's just a fact. What you've just said is a lie. Yes the best strategy is to invest in one’s own offspring. Men like Ghenghis had multiple wives and concubines whom they supported. Ghengis had many wives and concubines he would give them houses, protection, and support, all of his wives and many o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:02 AM
1

First, I hate dirty talking. It’s cringy as hell. Lol, no you don't. You're just not attracted to the man doing it, or you're not attracted to his voice. Again showing that you're just inexperienced. So definitely no, no talking during sex please. Also, not every woman has g-spot. I don’t. I've been with approximately 50 fucking women. All of them had a G spot. I can feel it. Not all of them knew where it was or how to stimulate it. This is pretty common. You most likely do have one and just don…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:58 AM
2

First of all women can definitely take more men they are more selective though so they aren’t interested in as many men as vice versa. Completely false. Vast majority of men will never stay with a woman who has multiple men. Not even a discussion. Men actually don’t take multiple women “all the time” only a small percentage of men can do this. When I say "all the time" what I really mean is 10x more often than women have ever done it. It’s women being selective that allows that in the first plac…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:39 AM
1

Most women can’t orgasm from penetration. We have clits for orgasms. Genuinely, I've slept with dozens of women. I hear this stupid shit all the time. I've even had entire arguments with groups of women on reddit about it. The TRUTH IS that you are all extremely uneducated on the female body and anatomy. Most of you never realize it until you're with an extremely sexually skilled man, and most of you never experience that. Women orgasm from clitoral stimulation, yes. It is NOT necessary. The G s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:21 AM
1

Youre more likely to be attacked by a bear than a human per interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:18 PM
2

Not really a man would take many good looking women. That’s why rich men have mistresses and side chicks some even have multiple wives. So there is way less competition on the woman’s side. See Arnold Scharrzneggars mistress for reference she wasn’t even good looking lol. Yeah, men take multiple women because they can...women can't do that. You're literally proving my point. Very woman can keep a relationship where she's got multiple men. Men do it ALL THE TIME. Because men have greater relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:17 PM
2

Hahahaha oh is that why men are obsessed with body count and policing women’s virginity?? You can’t possibly believe this in honesty. Gay men have average body counts in the dozens. Straight men have average body count around 4-7. That's because gay men have unlimited access to partners. Straight men are limited by the fact that women only like to have 1 partner at a time. The fact you don't believe this proves that you're a very weird woman. What about Ghangis Khan? If he had many children many…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:04 PM
1

So you not liking a source enough doesn’t negate it. All surveys are instantly negated. Nothing to do with liking them. They've been proven time andbtime again to be lying competitions in the scientific literature. That’s more of a personal issue on your end of you simply not liking it enough which idk what to tell you. This isn't up for debate. Surveys are useless data. Even The National Park Service reports that the chance of being injured by a bear is approximately 1 in 2.7 million so again e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:24 AM
1

I've actually showed a significant amount of vulnerability in front of my woman and it has 100% made our relationship stronger and made me trust her infinitely more. That said, 100% of all the other women I've done that with have used it against me in the most evil and vile ways you could imagine. Showing vulnerability in front of a woman is actually a good idea. Use it as a shit test. (You can only do this if you're an actually secure top tier man imo) but simply to test the ltr capabilities of…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 07:13 AM
4

Said it before and I'll say it again. The reason women are by and large sexually unfulfilled is because they're sexually low iq, lazy, and ignorant on average. The sheer number of women who actually think they can't orgasm from vaginally penetration is laughable. Women are overwhelmingly ignorant about sex and reliant on men for any type of sexual knowledge and gratification. Is it the responsibility of men to turn women on? No. But do they generally have to, to account for female sexual ignoran…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 06:59 AM
0

But. I’ll just share the stats that you wanna ignore: There are just 40 bear attacks on humans worldwide every year, and one fatal black bear attack per year in the US. Meaning it a 1 in 2.1 million chance of being attacked by a bear. 1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime First of all, that's 1 in 2.1 million chance of bear attack based on the fact that most people will never encounter a bear in their entire life Meanwhile, you enco…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 06:56 AM
1

Safe? No. You're never safe around a bear and that's the first fucking thing you'd be taught as a zookeeper or subject matter expert. And that's precisely why you need to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 06:49 AM
1

Do you think zookeepers know the ancient art of walking in a pattern that doesn’t alert the bears like the worms in dune or something? Zookeepers take a lot of precautions. Such as feeding the bears before working with them and being prepared at all times for the bear to act out aggressively. People have kept bears as pets. Yeah and people have kept crocodiles, lions, tigers, wolves, and cobras as pets too. What a retarded argument. People have literally kept...other PEOPLE as pets.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 09:46 AM
1

o, zookeepers go into the bear enclosure regularly 😮‍💨 So what you're telling me is, all you gotta do to interact with a bear safely is become a trained professional with years of experience, and be armed with bear spray+food during every interaction? It hurt itself in confusion!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 09:37 AM
1

Next time you go to the zoo, act out the claim you've made. Rather than exist around all those risky men, just jump into the bear exhibit where it's much safer!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 09:29 AM
1

Most bear encounters end without injury” So do most human interactions. Bear interactions still have a higher rate of injury than human interactions, and that's while most bear encounters happen in towns with black bears. IN THE FOREST IN THEIR TERRITORY ITS A MUCH HIGHER RATE AS WELL “Bears are NOT ferocious. They are NOT mean or malicious. Bears are normally shy, retiring animals that have very little desire to interact with humans. Unless they are forced to be around humans to be near a food …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:48 AM
0

I love how you listed jobs. Like it’s literally their fucking job. You don’t get brownie points for doing a job you signed up for???? Tell that to the next firefighter that pulls you out of a burning building or doctor that saves your life with open heart surgery, or EMT that puts a TQ on you after a brutal car crash. If you actually have this fucked up idea, you're an evil human. Evil. Most of these people do these jobs because they enjoy helping people. Not for the money. Because they don't fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:32 AM
2

Men offer resources to women in order to get sexual exclusivity. Not true. Women give out sexual exclusivity relatively freely. Be in a relationship with one and she's simply far less likely to cheat than her male counterpart independent of everything else. So for men the reproductive strategy is to invest in his own offspring that is his best bet of passing his genes. But how can he do this? He needs to make sure that when and where he invests the children are actually his ...tell that to Genes…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:28 AM
3

A woman doesn’t need to prove she is better at xzy than some other woman she just needs to look good. Looking good is a way of competing with other women...lol And men value women’s looks because they value what women are. Women value big ass muscles and wide clavicles for the exact same reason... these are not very utilitarian and to maintain the appearance of hyperfeminity a woman can’t be doing heavy manual labor or competing that much physically. The most physically attractive women on the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:23 AM
1

Bears are passive as hell, they are AFRAID of humans. Lmao. Youre actually hilarious. You think the 800lb behemoth with no natural predators is scared of the 150lb simian without a hide and no claws. No they're not fucking scared of humans. They're just not hungry at the time and it doesn't help them to fight you. Bears kill and eat MOOSE. Moose are 1000lbs of destruction. The ONLY reason a bear doesn't attack you is it doesn't serve a purpose to do so. If you're in its territory, or it's hungry…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:18 AM
2

While many criminal men are low IQ they don’t “reproduce more” only the ones who survive do. Male criminal death rates are not high enough to skew the data that shows felons reproduce more enough to change that fact. Also this assertion is absurd. Oh and poor women have more kids not poor men. Poor men compete harder for access and the distribution of fathers is more one sided. That’s why in “the ghetto” you’ll find men with multiple “baby mamas” which by virtue already tells you many men had no…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:15 AM
2

I literally have a bf also how does this prove anything? You know exactly what it proves. You're instead choosing to avoid the logic entirely. You really think it’s hard to get a bf?? Where did I say it's hard to get a boyfriend? I said it's hard to quickly get a boyfriend that is looksmatched to yourself. In reality, the ONLY way you can get one quickly (quickly means you have relationship market value high enough that he'd commit faster instead of by being slowly guided into it over several we…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:52 AM
1

Who said anything about average? You think the average passport bro is 50lbs overweight? I have no reason to believe otherwise. Just because he's in another country, it doesn't in any way shape or form mean he's outside the median physically for the country he's from. And didn’t you just say these men like the big women in those countries? No. That was some other person who's highly delusional. And why are you mentioning makeup meanwhile plastic surgery is quite common in Asia and South America …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:43 AM
2

Finding extraordinarily rare exceptions to the reality of my comment is that helping you. The nylotes wear body lengthening jewelry. We gonna seriously argue that changes the fact that the beauty standard has always and will always be a healthy woman? A few weirdos liking obesity and long necks doesn't change that 90% of the time that's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:38 AM
2

Men will sacrifice their entire freedom and space to ensure a woman is locked down and guarded at all times. Men will sacrifice their entire freedom, and safety just for the fucking thrill of it. Men will volunteer for extremely dangerous military combat deployments while making 30k per year. What you're arguing makes 0 sense. In reality, the data clearly shows there's less men seeking the type of relationships women want than there are women doing the same thing. Furthermore, simple data points…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:36 AM
1

We don't know what type of bear it is? We don't know what type of woods it is? We don't know if the man is armed? It's unbelievably funny that you think this is what I've been talking about. Hahaha These are purposefully left out to make people respond your failure to see this is alarming. What's alarming is the fact you're making up a conversation like a schizophrenic and pretending that's what we're discussing. Anyway have a good day as you are not worth talking g to as its like a brick wall. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 12:23 PM
–

The default male POV is that women want commitment, when that isn’t hard to find for most women 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 12:17 PM
1

It's a hypothetical question, people can answer how they see fit based on what they perceived the risk I wasn't claiming they were wrong about the hypothetical question. Please actually read if you're gonna argue everything I say tooth and nail. I said I'm objectively correct about the fact that survey data is effectively useless. Thus this question is more like what plus what equals 4 and you are upset some people have said one and three. Completely false premise. If you are unable to understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 12:11 PM
1

The only entitlement is genuinely thinking that there's no right or wrong on certain topics. 2+2=4. If you think that's wrong, you're just an entitled brat.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 12:00 PM
1

Of course studies are lying but you aren't Surveys aren't studies. They're surveys. They cited surveys. Studies prove surveys are not only unreliable, but actively filled with lies every time. right lol some people think differently to you sorry No, some people think incorrectly as compared to me. this has offended you so much. Not offended
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 11:07 AM
1

Sexual violence is reported at a rate that means 1 in 6 women self report it has happened to them. Surveys have been proven time and time again in the scientific literature to be large lying competitions. Furthermore, specifically rape is the crime with by far the highest rate of false accusation. It's the ONLY crime where the false accusation rate is the same as the conviction rate. In fact, you are as much as 10x more likely to be falsely accused of rape than any other crime. The way the false…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 10:40 AM
1

That's not true. A few rounds from an ar15 will kill a bear in seconds or minutes, and the shots will make it run in most cases too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 10:22 AM
1

I dont get where you people get this info from. Bears will literally hunt and eat you if they're hungry. You're just fortunate that they're usually not hungry because they're so fucking good at hunting. That said, if you so much as stumble into its territory it will NOT run away from you. Nor will it stop mauling you if you play dead. It will fucking kill and eat you alive and it will do it almost every single time. Youre in the woods. Not the middle of the street. The bear is gonna eat you aliv…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:52 AM
0

Men don’t protect people lol. Men account for 80+% of firefighters, first responders and military. On the titanic men got on the boat first, in the past drafts only men have ever been drafted, and any idiot knows that if someone attacks a man's wife, he's the first one to try to stop it in the vast majority of cases. Of course men protect people. Men are the sole reason an actual bear isn't murdering you RIGHT NOW. If not for civilization created by men, you'd be in a cave hiding from the wildli…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 09:47 AM
4

I don’t even know why people find it so unbelievable if you look at paintings from like the 1800s, the women are um plump. Completely false. The women in paintings historically range between 20-30% bodyfat, which happens to be the exact healthy range women should be in. American women tend to be more like 35-40%. Fat women aren't desired in the slightest, and also they give birth to more fucked up children.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:55 AM
3

The only reason a Western man would have an advantage dating abroad is BECAUSE he is considered better looking, is taller, has more money, status etc… The average American man is 50lbs overweight. To make the absurd claim he's more likely to be better looking is ridiculous. Either similar women here won’t date them or they are taken. Or...the women in the west will Date him but he feels these women are too annoying and liberal. Don't act like the real reason men go to other countries isn't becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:51 AM
3

That’s actually not true women don’t really compete To easily put this idiotic statement to shame, I'll just tell you this. If you really think it's that easy, go get a looksmatched bf right now. If it's that easy, let's pretend you're a 6/10. Get a 6/10 boyfriend within a few days. Try your best. But the reality is that you won't be able to. We all know why. At best you'll have some guys who will fuck you. They will not give you time or money. To get a relationship that quick and easy, you'll h…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:43 AM
3

This is because the cost of sex is more for women. If it cost me more than you than of course I’ll be more selective. The cost of sex is far more for a woman yes, and that's why it's harder for a man to get sexual access than it is for a woman. But the cost of a relationship is far more for a man than a woman. Women win on every front in what they get out of a relationship. Men really only get sex, and maybe some emotional connection with their girl or kids. That's why Men are the ones who are s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:38 AM
2

It’s still fundamentally a game of males competing to access for females. Is that why women spend 4x as much time, effort, and money on their dating lives than men do? Is that why women wear clown shoes, paint their face, and tailor made uncomfortable clothing every single day? Let's stop being silly. The ones who compete for access to the opposite gender are the women. Men compete a lot, but it's not for access. Men have access whenever they want it. Maybe to only 1 or 2 women, but they'll get …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:27 AM
2

As if being such a man is easy. In order for a man to be a mob boss, king pin etc he has to compete with other men and prove himself as the top dog he probably had many fights that he won, he is probably smart and tenacious, he probably has leadership qualities. Criminals are overwhelmingly lower IQ on average, to include men who commit things like felonies and aren't "king pins." (Which doesn't even exist outside of things like Mexican cartel and African warlords) furthermore, these lower iq me…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:17 AM
2

I'm glad I'm not autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter