TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No-Fisherman-330 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by No-Fisherman-330 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It definitely makes me feel better
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 08:06 PM
–

Not at all. Women write it off as just a minority of weirdos.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:27 PM
–

So what’s your point?? You think psycho incels shooting up schools have helped women understand more broadly the reality of the dating world for men? No, if anything I think most women believe something closer to “there are some chronically online psycho incels, and then there are the vast majority of men who are probably doing just fine getting attention they want from women”.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:14 PM
–

Not at all. She is responsible for herself being a dick, I am responsible for my choice of response. Is this your first time witnessing an angry argument? This is kind of how they all work
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:11 PM
–

No, this is my response to a disingenuous POS who deserves the same level of respect & good faith as she gave me
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:29 PM
–

Can’t speak for all men, but I’d rather be SA’d multiple times a year for the rest of my life than continue being undesirable romantically
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:11 AM
–

I can feel you seething and I love it 😂 add in a few more exclamation marks. You’re exactly who I’m writing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:09 AM
–

Yes exactly, which types of views do u mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:33 AM
–

Can you expand on your last sentence? I’ve seen a huge variety of views from women on this subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:25 AM
–

Except in 2025 there are countless progressive men who have listened intently to women explaining every nuanced struggle they deal with in today’s society. You think men can relate to those issues? No, but many of us listen, learn, and take it with us through life because that’s what is right. I have almost never seen women do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:17 AM
–

I truly think most women are completely clueless to the issues men face. I have many genuine well-meaning female friends, and apart from my sister, I’ve never met a woman who even has an inkling of understanding as to what the dating landscape looks like for men. In fact, even online, this subreddit is the only place I’ve seen women truly understand
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:25 AM
5

Are you saying most men would agree with this? Or are you saying “deep down” this is enough for most men, even if they think otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:23 AM
4

What do you think would happen next? As a result Edit: regarding the relationship dynamic between men & women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:36 AM
12

Nah. Plenty of these guys desire more than just a feminine meat hole for sexual release.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:57 AM
1

Exactly I mostly agree 🔥that’s why I said that talking point is a copout
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:11 AM
7

I’m friends with plenty of progressive women and they don’t call men incels for not interacting with women. The traits you’re describing sound more fitting for a “divine feminine” bioessentialist woman. I do know some women who’d call themselves “progressives” and might act like what you’re describing, but they don’t really care much about politics. I wouldn’t say this is a common trait among progressives or even your stereotypical blue-haired progressive college chick
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:51 PM
51

I may be wrong but I think many of these women would say the takeaway is that men need to find purpose in their lives and decenter women. A pretty obvious copout, but this is the answer I’ve heard many times
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:40 PM
1

When I say “women’s standards are absurdly high” I don’t mean they’re just arbitrarily or even consciously choosing higher standards in most cases. I know their attraction threshold is higher, this is what I mean
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:12 PM
–

Are there really men out there trying to explain these struggles to women whom they just met and are trying to pursue romantically?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:38 PM
3

Exactly. Women’s standards are absurdly high. That’s why I asked my question. So consider the hypothetical I posted. Would that be a moral failure on the part of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:33 PM
3

Is that a joke? That’s absolute nonsense, or else this subreddit wouldn’t exist. Women feeling societal pressure to be pretty is not the same thing as men doing what I described. An average woman will absolutely be seen as attractive by plenty of men regardless whether she conforms to the standards I laid out. The same is not true for men. Women are closer to behaving that way - that’s what this entire thread (and essentially all of PPD) is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:00 PM
5

You added in the “only”, not me 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:44 PM
10

The reason OP made this post is because women so commonly assert the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:41 PM
6

The way I understand it, a k-pop idol could potentiallyyy have a chad-tier face, and Henry Cavill would generally be considered to have one. The main criteria seems to be having no individual negative facial features (for example, some criteria I’ve seen most commonly referenced are absolutely no recession of the maxilla, good jaw/bigonial width, and hooded eyes with little to no upper eyelid exposure). You could be considered very attractive or hot if you don’t conform to the criteria fully, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:07 PM
0

Sounds like she is arguing with herself 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:18 PM
12

Again, absolutely nonsensical. People get frustrated all the time with wanting things without thinking they are owed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:14 PM
10

Spot on 🙌🏼
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:35 PM
6

At least in the looksmaxxing community, the emphasis is placed on having an attractive face (i.e. specific features, certain facial harmony ratios/ranges, etc.), and then being tall is usually seen as the next most important factor (though far less important than having a top tier face). Being a “chad” by their idea means being among the 2-3 best looking men in the whole club on a Friday night using the previous description. Using their reasoning, if the majority of girls say they don’t necessar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:53 PM
12

The definition of entitlement is being frustrated that you can’t have something that you want? You need a dictionary and a break from Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:55 PM
18

Do you think there would be any moral issue if men collectively decided to raise their standards so that only super fit beautiful women with big breasts, bubbly feminine personalities, no older than 25 were considered attractive, and all other women were completely ignored romantically? This is a hypothetical of course it would never happen. But I’m curious to hear your answer Edit: anyone downvoting me without answering my question is simply bitter that I pointed out a double standard
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:53 PM
6

The way I’ve seen it broken down in some of these circles, “Chad” is literally just a reference to the top 1-2% best-of-the-best looking, most attractive guys. Not any reference to a specific “type”, just very good looking
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:41 PM
1

Arguing semantics is essentially arguing over linguistics & the meanings of words. You were confused about what the word “extra” means, so I was correcting you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:47 PM
0

Notice how OP has not replied to a single comment. Even she knows how terrible this post is LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:44 PM
1

That’s just semantics. If you go from doing no chores to doing a normal amount of chores, you are now doing “extra” chores relative to before
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:27 PM
0

Come on. OP & every upvoter: y’all know very well this post is ridiculous. Pure ragebait
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 06:52 PM
10

So by your logic, you should keep the same energy if men collectively decided that only size 0 women who are fit, no older than 25, with big breasts and bubbly personalities are attractive, and no other women were considered even worth pursuing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 11:35 PM
9

You missed the point. If you’re an average woman, plenty of men will still find you attractive - you just won’t be hot enough to have a bunch of simps or get (as much) free stuff. If you’re an average man, the same is NOT true. The “rules” that the OP points out are basically a tax that women put on the majority of their dating options for not being hot enough, because the standards have gotten so high that the average man is seldom considered attractive at all
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:27 PM
1

I agree, and you’re right it’s important to note that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:02 AM
6

Exactly. The way it was phrased in the comment I replied to, it made it sound like lonely men simply just want a feminine meat hole for physical release & then they’d be happy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:58 PM
–

“Exclusion often applies to those who are radicalized to the extremes in terms of how they navigate dating and sex.” I’m sure this is true for the most chronically online misogynist-type incels & the like, but I don’t think this makes up a significant % of the men who can’t get a date. I think the majority of men who struggle with dating aren’t like that, and I think plenty of men who get lots of female attention are quite misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:46 PM
11

If it were as simple as “wanting women to fuck them”, all these lonely men could just hire escorts en masse, and that would be that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:30 PM
2

Are you implying that a 6 foot, 6 figures male engineer is the same level “above average” as any childless young woman of normal weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 01:57 AM
19

Combined with a “ugly men don’t care about women and only want sex” post. 2-for-1 combo! These women can’t help themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 01:00 AM
-1

I’m not discussing what men should or shouldn’t do to find the relationships they want. The point of my comment was to halt the notion that romantically lonely men are simplistic sex-drones with purely sexual impulses. I saw harmful rhetoric, so I called it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:39 PM
1

Nothing I said was disingenuous. I’m sure there are plenty of men who only want more sex, but any generalizing claims that romantically lonely men only want sex are simply harmful, and people spreading those claims are garbage human beings
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:36 PM
3

Regardless if that statement is true or not, men who say they’re romantically lonely aren’t just saying that they want sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 10:31 PM
11

Sex often goes hand-in-hand with romantic intimacy. Wanting a partner who has sex with you isn’t the same as being a sex-crazed creature who only values animalistic sexual impulses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:34 PM
6

This tired old talking point needs to die already. No, I’m not using coded language to refer to “sex” when I say I’m lonely. I crave romantic emotional intimacy and connection. No matter how badly you want us to be sex-crazed drones, it doesn’t make it true. Go ahead, keep asserting otherwise. Don’t let me break the comfy little narrative you’ve set up for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:33 PM
–

This is the obvious right answer. Not sure how this post even got upvoted this much - these women really are desperate to justify chasing physical attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:38 PM
2

I never tried to flex with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:05 PM
3

You hit the nail on the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 02:37 AM
1

Dude like 95% of my time was spent working… when I went out with friends, strangers at the bar don’t know what you do for work, & I didn’t flaunt it. All my friends were also successful, same with the girls in our friend group, so they went for the best looking guys in the finance group. And dating apps were shit, because big cities are literally full of other guys flexing their finance jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 02:32 AM
3

Are you okay? You might have replied to the wrong thread. You’re having your own debate here
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 01:23 AM
4

Yo the straw man’s already dead, you’re kicking a corpse
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:58 AM
6

Also, it doesn’t help that finance bros are a dime a dozen on dating apps in big cities. When your social circle is made up of “successful” people, and dating apps are too, it doesn’t really make a difference
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:28 AM
4

Fucking me doesn’t fulfill the romantic intimacy box that I’m emphasizing. See how that works? Almost like you’re debating a straw man
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:14 AM
9

Yes but unfortunately I’ve found it doesn’t make much of a difference - it took me a full year of obsessively tracking each calorie & gram of protein, and running a professionally catered hypertrophy routine just to start looking like “oh he’s probably been hitting the gym a little”. Then i started the new job, which took up my entire life & i couldnt prioritize gains. Now I’ve been back in the gym & considering PEDs so i can get the dream beach body while I’m still young
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:09 AM
8

…this is exactly the point. It’s very obvious, we’re not retarded. I’ve obsessed about my looks for years. I’m an average looking guy - above average height, no excess fat, keep my haircut every 2 weeks, care about how I dress. I’ll catch a girl smiling at me at bars once or twice a year, but not good looking enough to get consistent matches on dating apps
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:02 AM
38

Did this. Became an investment banking analyst in NYC and met lots of new friends. Still had virtually 0 attention/reception from women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:43 PM
4

This tired old talking point needs to die already. No, I’m not using a secret male code to refer to “sex” when I say I’m lonely. I crave romantic intimacy and connection. No matter how badly you want us to be sex-crazed drones, it doesn’t make it true. Go ahead, keep asserting otherwise. Don’t let me break the comfy little narrative you’ve set up for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 10:22 PM
2

I think you’re misunderstanding again. I’m saying that many successful relationships begin without an intense spark on the first profile view/interaction/meetup. People meet, learn more about each other, and a small flame turns into a fire. The “Don’t swipe right unless you’re already in love at first sight” approach is fundamentally flawed, especially as a man. You’re signing men up for failure, in more ways than one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:02 AM
3

You seem to assume that all or most successful relationships begin with an intense, soul-consuming spark right off the bat. This is wrong. We’re not “saving” anything by limiting our options.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 05:57 AM
3

You don’t understand. We swipe on all of those, and then HUNDREDS MORE. We don’t get more than ~1-3 matches per week, & those to women who have hundreds of guys in their inbox so they don’t bother replying. If we took your advice, we’d be even LESS likely to ever make a romantic connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 04:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter