TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NoSignificance9966 Archive

View 0 posts and 249 comments by NoSignificance9966 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They can define it for themselves but virginity was traditionally about PIV
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:22 PM
2

Handjobs and fingering are called manual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:19 PM
1

No because it’s still the sexual act that would naturally create life. Why is it a gray area? It’s literally a sexual act
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:12 PM
2

Well I asked you how you define it. A lot of things are social constructs but we still find them useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:09 PM
1

So where do you draw the line? Making out and dry humping can be considered sexual acts as well. Piv is objectively more significant than any sexual act due to the fact it’s the only sexual act that create life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:08 PM
2

So how do you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:04 PM
2

What’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:03 PM

Words don’t seem to have meanings these days it just seems like the definitions are based on people’s feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 08:05 PM

But head includes the pp and a hole lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:53 PM

So does head count?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:51 PM

Does finger fucking count? What about head??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:49 PM

How do you define penetration? Does oral and fingering count?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:43 PM

I’ve seen people in this day and age defining virginity very differently to how I always understood so what do you guys think? How do you define virginity? Do you think handjobs, fingering and blowjobs would mean you’re not a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:38 PM
1

So you can be a virgin and have a bodycount?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 05:25 PM
1

Why’s that? The intention of making out is to cause sexual arousal, if oral and manual are considered sex then I believe making out should be as well. Eating ass doesn’t involve genitals but most would still say it’s a sexual act
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:29 PM
1

So where do you draw line and the definition of sex can be quite subjective. You can technically have “sex” without any genitals being involved
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:27 PM
1

Would you say these sexual acts take virginity? Would you include things like making out?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:26 PM
1

Where do you draw the line and why do you think other sexual acts should be included? Do you see all these sexual acts as significant as PIV?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:20 PM
1

Since we’re all ready speaking about what counts, let me ask this. If a person did only oral or manual sexual acts with 3 people but had vaginal intercourse with one what would you say their count was?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:06 PM
1

lol but fr what do you actually include?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:03 PM
1

Why does it have to be penis then loser? Why are you making up random illogical definitions? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:03 PM
1

Why does it have to enter something? Does fingering take virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:50 PM

Do you believe you can be a virgin and have a bodycount at the same time if you’ve done sexual acts besides vaginal intercourse or do you believe only PIV is included in bodycount?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:29 PM
1

Women with kids have sex, wowwww shocking
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:22 PM
1

Agreed but some people are still trying to say that’s casual. Most relationships start off as not so serious so I don’t understand their point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 11:20 AM
1

The anus is a poophole it’s not a sexual organ and making out is literally a sexual act, you’ve got your tongues in each others mouths and your touching each others bodies. It’s the first step before more serious shit follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 10:41 AM
1

No making out is a sexual thing, it causes arousal. A rimjob doesn’t involve sexual organs or genitals but it’s still a sexual act. I don’t have a girl, be consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 10:24 AM

So I don’t understand what you mean when you say no sexual contact. You’re not being clear or consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 10:05 AM

So even making out makes her a no? That’s sexual contact as well imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:51 AM

Why tho? Why does being a non virgin automatically make it a no? How do you define virgin btw? What if she’s done oral or given a handjob? Would that be acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:35 AM
1

How do you define commitment? Are open relationships considered committed if they love each other and are okay with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:34 AM
-1

Okay then one could argue it’s casual if you have sex outside of marriage as well. All relationships outside of marriage are casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:27 PM
1

Okay but I wouldn’t say these are people that are into casual sex, to me casual sex is one night stands or fwb
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:51 PM
1

So would you call it casual sex if they’d been getting to know each other for maybe a few months but ended it once they realised it’s not working out? I don’t really see that as casual, I just see it as a relationship that didn’t come to fruition or work out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:59 PM

Couldn’t that relationship become permanent?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:15 PM
3

How do we define casual sex? If two young individuals were getting to know each other but weren’t serious about each other yet and did sexual things with each other for a few months but then realised it’s not working out would this be seen as casual sex? I think this is very different to a one night stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:41 AM
2

Have you done any sexual acts besides vaginal intercourse?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:34 AM

Why for a relationship but not for marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:33 AM
1

I think you’re wrong. I see women get shamed all the time for promiscuity but I hardly see men get shamed for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:37 PM
1

What a dumb argument you’re making. Promiscuity being harder for men doesn’t mean it should be praised, men being promiscuous has negative effects on society and relationships as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:31 PM
1

Why is it entirely due to women and why should society praise male promiscuity? Just because it’s harder for men doesn’t mean it should be praised. If it’s Shameful for women then it should also be seen as shameful for men as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:26 PM
1

I think society would be better if promiscuous men were shamed just as much as much as promiscuous women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 05:51 PM
1

So you’re saying people don’t see it as a loss of virginity because they feel like they haven’t gone all the way yet and once they have it just feels like another sexual act? The vagina feels very different to the mouth and is objective a more significant type of sex but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:33 AM
1

Yes, most straight people say only intercourse or penetrative sex takes virginity but lesbian’s usually include oral and manual sexual acts as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:20 AM
1

You could say the same thing about any sexual act
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:18 AM
1

I don’t think you guys are actually understanding the question. I asked why people that don’t think oral takes virginity include it in bodycount.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:18 AM
1

What are you even on about? Most Straight people tend to define virginity differently. This hasn’t got anything to do with lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:13 AM
2

Talking about straight people
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:08 AM
1

Why do a lot of people include oral in bodycount if they don’t think it takes virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:04 AM
2

For the people that would only marry somebody if they were virgins, why? Would you ever make an exception? Would you still see them as marriage material if they’d done other sexual acts besides intercourse?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 10:31 AM
1

What did he say?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 10:28 AM
1

Okay so your answer is you don’t care? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:43 PM
1

Your answer was she’ll decide but I want to know what you’d think.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:33 PM
1

Yes or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:26 PM
1

Well they would still technically be virgins, peoples opinions are irrelevant. The definition is the definition. It would be a sin according to their religion but not something that takes virginity. Answer the question, if a woman only gave head to 1-2 guys before you but never had intercourse would you not still see her as a virgin, if you slept with her would you not feel like you’re the one that took her virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:07 PM
1

So if you met a girl and she only gave a blowjob to a guy before you but you’re the only one that had intercourse with her you wouldn’t feel like the one that took her virginity? I don’t know why you keep quoting clerks like it means anything, you could use the same extreme scenarios for making out and dry humping but that doesn’t usually happen irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:59 PM
1

Yes if he just got a blowjob and didn’t have intercourse he would still be a virgin. It’s a sexual act but not the one that takes virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:51 PM
1

I don’t see why you always feel the need to comment the ppd consensus like it’s something really important anyway. I think me and you both know in real life hardly any straight person would say they lost their virginity from giving or receiving a blowjob.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:46 PM

I personally don’t include things like oral in bodycount but I’d want to know about it if I asked about her bodycount. I don’t think it takes virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:45 PM
1

What about a girl that’s made out with 50 guys or been fingered by several guys? Can she not claim virginity anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:37 PM
1

If you wanna include head in your bodycount then doing it but most people will think you sound lame asf. I’ve never heard any person in real life saying they lost their virginity to a blowjob lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:30 PM

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:24 PM
1

Just shut up man, I literally asked the question the other day and almost everybody said they only count vaginal intercourse for virginity
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:24 PM
1

But that isn’t true, the majority of straight people don’t count it especially when it comes to virginity
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:11 PM

You just want to argue for the sake of it but your argument makes no fucking sense. If you’re going to include oral theirs no reason why you shouldn’t include hand stuff. Virginity is about vaginal intercourse but people have made the definition complicated. Homosexuals can define for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:01 PM

Okay enough with your pseudo intellectual arse. Fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:57 PM

Making out? Dry humping? Those could be considered sexual acts as well
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:57 PM
1

You could say the same thing about habdjobs, fingering or even making out. That argument is fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:56 PM

So what do you count?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:55 PM

The way bodycount is defined is subjective the reason why most people include it is because it’s a sexual act and the people that want to know about a persons past usually want to to know about all the sexual acts they’ve done with people not just intercourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:54 PM

A handjob could count but most people aren’t gonna say it took their virginity are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:52 PM
2

A lot of people say otherwise, I don’t think theirs any solid proof that the majority of people in here include oral but a lot of the people that do could be of different sexual orientations.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:52 PM

In a sexual way obviously and what about oral then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:44 PM
2

That’s dependent on the place you live plus a lot of sexual acts are probably not being included in these studies. Most straight people are probably only including intercourse and leaving out the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:43 PM

This is about virginity not bodycount idk why you always feel the need to comment this lol it seems like you’re the one that really wants to count it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:42 PM

I’ve already done one and it wasn’t even close lol. Oral was no where near as serious as vaginal or anal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:59 PM

So you think oral takes virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:30 PM

So what about oral? Is that not serious abs isn’t it subjective? These acts may be very serious to some
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:30 PM
2

You really think 7 is high?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:11 PM

Why do some consider anal a loss of virginity for straight people but not oral or fingering? Aren’t those acts forms of penetration as well? Why is it different in your opinion? For those that think any sexual act takes virginity where do you draw the line? Can somebody who’s made out with another person claim they’re not a virgin anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:10 PM
1

How have you not heard or seen this? You’ve never seen an ugly guy or a guy with a terrible personality get a hook up before? The girl could’ve hooked up with him for several reasons but then realised she doesn’t actually find him attractive enough to carry it on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:35 PM
1

Nope. Girls hook up for multiple reasons, a lot of girl regret hooking up with certain guys, regret ever giving him a chance and no for a fact they wouldn’t be in a serious relationship with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:23 PM
-1

Maybe because you have a terrible personality or maybe you had the game to get a hookup but you’re not attractive enough to keep her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:36 PM
3

Would you rather be a guy that can get a hookup but can’t get a girl to stay and love you or be a guy that can get a girl to stay and love you but have a hard time getting a hookup? I personally would rather have love and a serious relationship, I feel like hooking up starts feeling pointless and degenerate after a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 06:20 PM
2

Are you dumb? Are you saying a woman with over 5 partners in her life could never be loyal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:43 PM
1

Oral can be with a dick
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:54 PM
1

Isnt oral and fingering technically penetration as well tho? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 02:28 PM
1

Why anal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 01:59 PM
1

Why do you apply standards for yourself that don’t align with the traditional definition? Would you say making out or dry humping takes virginity as well since those acts could be considered sexual to some people?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 08:12 AM

The definition of virginity is about intercourse though isn’t it? What about getting fingered or handjob?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:49 AM
2

Do you guys think a person that’s done oral but never had intercourse has the right to call themselves a virgin? What about handjobs or getting fingered?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:44 AM
3

Do you actually see yourself as a promiscuous woman? Do you think that would hurt your chances for getting in a LTR with someone you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 07:39 AM

So what if you weren’t? What if you fell in love with a woman who had a few before you? Do you think that makes you the guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:29 PM

What’s your point? The weirdos on Twitter were saying any guy that doesn’t marry a middle’s virgin is the cuck waiting for her to settle down in line
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 04:28 PM

But the person that posted it implied that’s any guy that doesn’t marry a kissless virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:40 PM

What if he was a virgin and decided to marry the first woman he sleeps with? It doesn’t necessarily mean he was waiting around, he just liked the first woman he got with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 03:23 PM

Okay but how is that relevant to the meme? How does marrying a woman with 1-2 bodies before you make you the guy in the meme? She could’ve slept with those men years before and she could desire you a lot more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:16 AM

Okay but being a non virgin doesn’t necessarily mean they have very different values and attitudes and I still don’t understand how it makes you a cuck that’s waiting in line with flowers after seeing multiple men fuck her in front of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:14 AM

What’s that got to do with marrying a non virgin? A woman that has 1-2 bodies has “slept around”?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 10:09 AM

Have you guys seen the meme of the guy waiting in line holding flowers whilst the girl he wants to marry is getting smashed by multiple guys? According to weirdos on twitters you’re that guy if you marry a non virgin woman. What do you think about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 07:50 AM
5

Some guys would say you settled if you don’t marry a kissless virgin. It’s up to you and what you’re comfortable with, it’s not always about settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 01:31 PM
1

Thanks, my mind just makes me suffer a lot sometimes but I appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 07:10 PM
1

Yes I agree, me being the one she lost her virginity to is something I have over them right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:53 PM
2

Thanks, you’ve been very kind. I appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:17 PM
1

Kind of and they just didn’t deserve her, she would never have gave them a chance if she wasn’t in a bad place, she didn’t even really find them attractive. I think she did it mainly for validation and so she can distract herself from all of her other problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:07 PM
1

Well I’m not planning to be around them anyway lol because I’d probably break their faces but do you think I can say I have something over them?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:49 PM
1

It’s just my paranoia. Do you think they have something over me or do I have it over them since I’m the only one she did everything with?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:44 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:43 PM
1

No, of course not. Why would they be? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:43 PM
1

It just upsets me to think about it at times and I get paranoid and feel like they’re talking bad about me behind my back and feeling like they have something over me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:32 PM
1

I’m confused. My experience of passion with two other guys? Sorry can you explain what you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:27 PM
1

How do you define a high body count?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:16 PM
8

Well it happens the other way around as well. If men see a guy marrying a woman they deem to be promiscuous, they usually start shaming him and calling him things like simp or cuck especially online.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:11 PM
3

No I’ve actually heard a lot of guys say they don’t want virgin women, they usually just prefer women with low body counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:09 PM
1

No I’ve actually heard a lot of guys say they don’t want virgin women, they usually just prefer women with low body counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:09 PM
1

Yh the reason I’m asking this question in other places is because the rj sub can sometimes do more harm than good. Theirs a lot of weirdos in there that want you to feel as miserable as them. Do you think I have something over the past guys because I was the only that was able to sleep with her and take her virginity? How bad do you think my situation is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:03 PM
1

Ngl making out makes me uncomfortable as well. You would be able to look past a girl making out with 5 guys before you?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 12:43 PM
1

When you say no past does that include kissing/making out btw?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 12:27 PM
2

You don’t think that’s hypocritical? You’re entitled to your standards but I don’t see how some people can think it’s moral for men to sleep around but not for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 12:26 PM
1

Do you have a past? What number do you think make somebody a hoe or too far gone?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 12:11 PM
1

But she was still a virgin. Would you not give a woman like that a chance if you really liked her? No exceptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 11:56 AM
2

What are you even on about? Not all women lie and how is that even relevant? I’m just saying some women are okay with virgins especially if they’re ones themselves or have a low count.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 11:53 AM
1

How would you view it would you be okay with it? Is it a W that I’m the only one that slept with her and took her virginity?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 11:46 AM
0

But is it still something that I’m the only ones that slept with her? Do i not have that over them? Was your girl a kissless virgin if you don’t mind me asking or was she a virgin that’s done some things?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:53 AM
2

They really don’t mind, I think you need to touch grass. If you’re decent looking, she won’t care especially if she’s only got 1-2 bodies as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:42 AM
1

It’s not an outlier, most women with low bodycounts don’t mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:36 AM
1

Well mine is a virgin according to the traditional definition. I think I’m just a bit mentally ill tbh because it feels like those guys have something over me and are laughing at me. Is it at least a W that I’m the only one that’s slept with her and done certain things with her, do I at least have that over them?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:35 AM
-1

I think any past would make me uncomfortable. Do you think my situation is that bad? Isn’t it a W that I’m the only that was able to sleep with her and do other things?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 09:05 AM
1

Do you think it helps knowing you’re the only that’s actually had intercourse with her and done other certain things? Doesn’t that mean she probably values you more than the other guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 06:24 AM
1

Can you expound on that a bit? Are you saying the guys in the past would stop caring or the guy with her in the present? How does fucking her make you stop caring?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 05:51 AM
1

Is it possible to get over it? Is it really possible to get over a woman’s past if it’s nothing too crazy in this day and age? Let’s say you expected a kissless virgin woman because you come from a religious background but you fall for a woman that has a past, nothing too crazy, she hasn’t had intercourse but she’s given oral to 1-2 guys before you. Do you think it’s possible to get over it? Do you think you can get the thoughts out of your head that others are laughing at you behind your back? …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 05:37 AM
1

Okay? Those same people will probably include handjobs, making out and fingering as well. I think most guys would wanna know if a woman’s been fingered by 50 guys or made out with them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:33 AM
1

Hell no lol, I don’t get shit from that. If was going to be 100% honest I would mention it but it would be separate from my bodycount.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:15 AM
1

Yh but the plot to clerks is funny because of how extreme it is. Most girls have given head to a couple of guys before they lose their virginity and they don’t usually fully count it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:11 AM
1

Well most people said the same about oral. Most people said they haven’t had oral without going all the way since high school or college.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 03:03 AM
1

Not really theirs many different opinions on this, I’ve seen in other posts from years ago where most straight people were only including piv or penetrative sex. If you’re going to include oral then you might as well include any act that can be deemed sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 02:50 AM
1

Only piv or anal should be included in a persons bodycount if they’re straight, if you’re going to add things like oral than you might as well add handjobs, fingering and making out as well. You should still tell your partner about the other stuff you’ve done if you’re willing to disclose that information though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 01:56 AM
14

I’m guessing it’s a sociopath that’s horny
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:52 PM
1

If she did have a past would it have bothered you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:36 AM
1

I’m sorry if you find this question disrespectful but did your girl have a past when you met her or did you just both get lucky and never have to deal with that stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:36 AM
1

So you care about what others think when it comes to your relationship? Would you really let some losers from the past ruin it for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:31 AM
1

True I’m just saying those guys are weirdos for even thinking about a girl like that when it was a long time and she probably didn’t want anything to do with them anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:30 AM
1

Yh but it’s different to be disrespecting them and mocking them but to each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:29 AM
1

Hope he finds out and confronts her about it tbh. One reason why I’d never be okay for my girl to have friends of the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:28 AM
1

Lot of men don’t show their true character till later, it could’ve been in her teen years and it might’ve just been a casual thing that she regretted later on
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:18 AM
1

I still don’t get what you’re trying to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:17 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:13 AM
1

Yh but those are extreme cases, if a girl had sex with 1-2 guys in the past even if it was casual and those guys are now laughing at her because she married then that’s just pathetic in my opinion and it seems like you’re not fully over her or just immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:13 AM
1

She still talks to you? Nah I wouldn’t like that if I was him. If I’m a with a girl she can’t have any contact with a guy from the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:09 AM
2

Yh that’s different, you’re not laughing at her or husband just because you had sexual relations with her you’re just relieved you didn’t get put in a bad situation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:08 AM
1

You never know, he might know about but he might not want to think or talk about it, he’s probably just happy for how she is in the present.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:04 AM
1

But most guys see all sexual acts as degrading when it comes to women. Why would you care? If you don’t care about the woman why are you mocking her, her husband and her relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:55 AM
1

Well he might be talking about her character in the present day. I don’t see how it’s funny to laugh at someone else for commiting to a woman if they’re happy together.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:54 AM
1

Would you care? Would you be worried about something like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:41 AM
1

What’s your point? Isn’t it weird to make fun of someone for marrying a woman from your past? It seems like you’re not over her or just immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:30 AM
-2

I’m saying a lot of these average guys make themselves become below average by having a weird mindset and no confidence. I’ve seen 3 out 10 guys get casual sex just because they were confident and social so I don’t see why theirs such an incel problem online.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:29 AM
3

https://preview.redd.it/ir3y0wbfmqae1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fed1a34f010ddcef0b7b58468ad6a4112fcc35a5 What do you guys think of this Is it something you would do as well? I think it’s a bit pathetic personally especially when most guys in this day and age won’t be marrying kissless virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:15 AM
1

No I think those guys are below average and it’s mainly because of their mindset, I’ve seen some really ugly, short broke guys getting casual sex and I’m sure others have as well yet I see guys on the internet who are probably better than these guys complaining like incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:09 AM
-2

I don’t even think it’s that hard to get casual sex, I’ve seen so many ugly guys getting casual sex. A lot of these guys are just losers that stay in their bedrooms, watch red pill content and think they’re experts in female nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 07:56 AM
6

No true red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:48 PM
1

What if a girl did other sexual acts like oral or handjobs in the past but didn’t go all the way? Would you mind if she made you wait for intercourse then?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 11:22 AM
1

I didn’t expect that answer coming from a Muslim tbh lol I thought you would say more than 1 or 2 in her whole life, most Muslims are usually quite conservative like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:47 AM
1

I mean like handjobs, blowjobs, fingering etc. I’m not saying you’re a hypocrite I was just wondering if you would ever make an exception for someone. What bodycount do you think makes somebody a hoe or slut? Sorry if I’m being annoying lol, just making conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:38 AM
1

So you wouldn’t make any exception if you really liked a girl? What if she’s done other sexual things but is still technically a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:27 AM
1

You created an image? So was that just a facade? Have you had sexual relations before? I’m not judging btw and What would your bodycount limit be for a girl you want marry? Does she have to be a kissless virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 08:11 AM
1

Haram! Joking but have you already done sexual things together before marriage and are you fully committed to marrying her?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:55 AM

When you say her best do you mean sexually or as a romantic partner? If you’re talking sexually then what if your partner hasn’t had actual intercourse but has done other sexual things like oral or handjobs? Would you be worried about being her best then since you would be the only one thats actually had intercourse with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:20 AM

What would your solution be if you were with a woman with low count but you were still in your feelings? Would you just try to get over it or give up?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:14 AM

But what’s the solution for a person like that, finding a kissless virgin becomes less common the older you get so wouldn’t it be better to try and fix the problem in your head?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:09 AM

What if you very secure in that regard but it just upsets you and disgusts you when you think about it at times?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:07 AM

So all you can do is cope? Isn’t it a bit pathetic to be so upset over it if the bodycount isn’t even high though?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 09:24 AM

Getting a virgin doesn’t help. A lot of virgin girls have experimented and done oral and other stuff in the past. You would need to find a girl that has done absolutely nothing with a guy and that gets harder as you get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:56 AM

What if you already know it’s low but still have a hard time with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:53 AM

Let’s say it’s a bit of both
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:47 AM

So do you think it would be a possible for a man without a past who sees sex as a sacred thing to get over a woman doing sexual things with a few guys before him?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:40 AM

Is it actually possible to get over a woman’s past? I feel like the more you love a woman the harder it becomes even if she’s good to you and her past isn’t anything crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 08:24 AM

Don’t lie about it, relationships are built on trust and if she rejects because of it then she probably wasn’t a good woman anyway so you’re not missing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:02 AM
1

I thought red pillers are against committing to promiscuous women. Are you sure red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 06:09 AM
1

So is theirs a specific number that makes somebody a slut? If a woman has ever had casual sex is she automatically a slut?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 05:48 AM
1

How do you even define what a slut is? Is a woman that had casual sex with 1-2 guys in the past and regretted a slut for life? Is their certain number that makes her a slut and makes her too far gone?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:54 AM
7

Isn’t it subjective? What’s high to some may be low to others and vice versa. People have their own standards even if they are very unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 03:40 AM
1

So did you count it before you ended up doing PIV with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 03:51 AM
2

Do you include oral?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 03:24 AM
2

How is that funny it just makes you look pathetic tbh. She’s a scumbag as well if she’s still texting you whilst being in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 06:20 PM
1

You could literally the same thing about a girl that’s made out with a guy and a girl that hasn’t. I think you’re going too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:14 AM
2

So let’s say a girl blew a guy when she was 16 but didn’t go all the way with him? Are you saying this woman is far too gone to love you like a kissless Virgin would? Come on, people make mistakes In life, I think you’re putting certain types of women on a pedestal and looking down on others like they’re all the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:10 AM
1

Well like I said before the casual sex could’ve been in her teen years and she could still technically be a virgin if she’s only done oral or manual sexual acts. I don’t know why you think kissless virgin girls can only give you that kind of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:03 AM
1

But that’s just not true is it? If a girl had “casual sex” in high school or college with 1 or 2 guys why tf can’t she be serious about you? It makes no sense. What if it was only or oral or manual sexual acts? Would you say the same thing? I don’t think you have much experience with women tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 02:49 AM
1

Why is it laughable if she isn’t a hoe? What if it was in by her teen years when most relationships tend to be casual? Idek how we define casual tbh but I think it’s lame to laugh if the person isn’t even very promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 02:38 AM
2

Why? How does having casual sex with 1 or 2 guys in the past make one a hoe?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 02:30 AM
1

So would you find it humorous if the girl had a low body count or if she had casual sex very few times?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 02:14 AM
2

I think shamelessness is much worse than a high bodycount. I think most guys would rather be with a girl that had 10 bodies in private than a girl that has 3 bodies but theirs several videos with each guy on the internet for everybody to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 01:49 AM
1

I never mentioned anything about the woman being bad or a hoe. This is for any woman with a past.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 01:47 AM
4

But isn’t it a bit pathetic to laugh at someone for being with someone you’re not with anymore? Do you laugh at the partners of all the girls you’ve been with? Some guys will see any sex act as degrading or amusing tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 11:45 PM
3

Not necessarily talking about party girls or town bikes I’m just talking about women in general that have been with other guys before
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 11:35 PM
6

I saw someone saying on Twitter saying he laughs when he sees guys married to girls he’s been with or slept with? Is this true? Do most guys do this? I’m a guy and I personally wouldn’t do it unless the woman was a completely shameless person that does everything out in the open and even then I wouldn’t disrespect him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 10:53 PM
1

I saw someone saying on Twitter he laughs when he sees guys married to girls he’s been with or slept with? Is this true? Do most guys do this? I’m a guy and I personally wouldn’t do it unless the woman was a completely shameless person that does everything out in the open and even then I wouldn’t disrespect him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 10:52 PM
1

Exactly, run away like a typical red piller when somebody looks deeper into your ideology and shows it’s flawed and degenerate. People like you would just assume a person is a beta bux without even know the full story of their relationship. You guys have a very reductive and cynical way of looking at relationships and I hope one day you can better yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:36 AM
1

Go on answer me. If a woman did things with 1 or 2 guys in a casual way in her younger years but did more with you when she met you, you both decide to get married. Would you automatically become a beta bux if you start taking care of this woman because those guys from the past didn’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:30 AM
1

You said you answered all my questions in full
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:27 AM
1

You didn’t answer them and I’m giving you these hypotheticals to show you how flawed and stupid the theory is
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:21 AM
1

Typical red piller when you add a bit of nuance into it you become stuck
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:19 AM
1

It is difficult because it isn’t always a black and white situation like the red pill paints it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:18 AM
1

Okay so what if the woman did those things in her teen years when most people don’t take relationships seriously? What if she didn’t expect anything from you either at the start but you both wanted to take things seriously? What if she didn’t do certain sexual things with them that she does with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:17 AM
1

You called me a dumbass for no reason. So if you marry a non virgin woman are you a beta bux since the other guys didn’t commit to her the way you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:49 AM
1

Awww is the red pilled retard upset? I bet you can’t even truly define what a beta bux is you’ll probably call any man that’s willing to take care of a woman a betabux if she isn’t a kissless virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:19 AM
1

What bodycount stops a woman from being wife material and if you marry a woman that’s had sex before you do you automatically become a beta bud according to red pillers?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 04:44 AM
1

It seems to me red pill terms like alpha fuxs beta bux is just bullshit used to make men insecure about being in a committed relationship with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 01:05 AM
1

So you’re a beta bud if you marry a woman that had casual sex in the past even if she was willing to have it with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 01:00 AM
1

What if she was having sex with you as well but also wants a committed relationship because she has feeling for you that she didn’t have for the other guys? Are you beta bux if you take her seriously and give her marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:02 PM
2

I disagree with this, if a woman had casual sex in the past and it made her feel slutty why would she do the same thing regardless of how attracted she is to the new guy? She could treat the guy much better than those other guys once she knows they’re both serious about each other
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:00 PM
1

Okay so what if she gives him very enthusiastic sex and does things for him? Is he a beta bux because he married her and is providing for her unlike the other guys? What if she was technically a virgin that only gave the others guys blowjobs or handjobs but is having full intercourse with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:58 PM

So her having sex with you inside a committed relationship makes you a beta bux? Even if she’s very attracted to you and regrets her past decisions?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:12 PM

So do you think a woman should have a casual sex with the new guy she wants to be with just because she did it in the past?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:02 PM

But don’t you think relationships are more than just sex, the woman could still be giving you certain things she never gave those guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:01 PM

How many do you think is too many?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:59 PM

I don’t get what you mean. Can you explain please?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:59 PM

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:35 PM

So what if she learned from her mistakes and realised casual sex isn’t worth it? She may still have a high libido for her new guy but she might want commitment as well now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:35 PM

How do red pillers even define what a beta bux is? It genuinely confuses me. Is any guy that marries a girl who had casual sex in the past a beta bux? Can the woman not regret the mistakes she made in the past and change her ways? Is any guy willing to provide for a woman who has had sex with a man outside of a very serious relationship a beta bux? Is the guy that was able to get casual sex from her automatically an alpha fux?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 06:24 PM
2

A mouth isn’t a tight hole like the vagina or anus, it’s not considered a private part, you can’t really thrust into the mouth like you can vagina or anus even though their are exceptions and it doesn’t give a woman much feeling of physical pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 05:12 PM
2

Did you even read what I said, theirs a big difference between sucking and fuckinh just like getting fingered or a tit fuck is very different to actual fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 05:01 PM
2

Yh I agree with you, I would see that girl as a virgin but I’d still want to know about so I know what I’m dealing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:55 AM
2

Because they’re both penetrative sexual acts and they both include what most people would see as private parts. You can’t really penetrate and thrust into a persons mouth like you can the vagina or anus unless they have no gag reflex and even then it’s very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:53 AM
1

How do you know that though? You have no proof of it and the men that complain about being sexless marriages are hardly getting intercourse as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:51 AM
1

So sucking one or two dicks in her younger years when she’s young and dumb means she should be labelled a hoe for life?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:54 PM
1

Okay but most virgin women tend to give blowjobs before they actually lose their virginity and I don’t take guys that say beta bux alpha fucks seriously lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:50 PM
1

What does it say? A blowjob or a handjob for most people isn’t seen as going all the way, if she’s done it with lots of people then it’s bad but if it’s less than a few people than it doesn’t say much at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:47 PM
1

Making out counts?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:33 PM
1

Yes I would, if she’s only given a blowjob to one or two guys I would still see her as a virgin and quite innocent if she hast done anything else. Anal is a gray area for me, she’d still technically be a virgin and I’d aknowledge that but I wouldn’t see her as one due to anal being somewhat similar to vaginal intercourse but blowjobs and handjobs are very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:33 PM
2

Yes I would, if she’s only given a blowjob to one or two guys I would still see her as a virgin and quite innocent if she hast done anything else. Anal is a gray area for me, she’d still technically be a virgin and I’d aknowledge that but I wouldn’t see her as one due to anal being somewhat similar to vaginal intercourse but blowjobs and handjobs are very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 10:32 PM
1

I don’t believe it’s subjective and i think this modern definition is absurd. Vaginal intercourse is considered the most significant act because it’s the only sexual act that can create children and throughout history it was seen as a way to ensure paternity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 08:46 PM
1

But the liberal definition where any sexual act can take virginity is also very flawed because people define sex in different ways. It would be ridiculous to say an act like phone sex, dry humping or making out can take virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 08:29 PM
1

I think it’s a lot easier to get a blowjob before sex. Most women will give a blowjob to a guy before they’ll go all the way with him, it’s literally foreplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:56 PM
2

I care about it. You don’t have to if you don’t want to and others can define it for themselves but I don’t think people should try to shame others by going with the traditional definition of the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:53 PM
2

No but I’m saying even a low bodycount in those countries could be considered a slut, I’ve seen some people from traditional countries saying even a girl with a bodycount of 1 before marriage is a slut. These people are not forgiving and they don’t acknowledge people can make mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:51 PM
2

I’m not saying we should care lol I’m just saying you might see the things they’ve done as promiscuous but they would still be technical virgins according to the traditional definition
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:48 PM
2

So you think a girl that only sucked off one or two guys is the same as a girl that’s been fucked? Be real.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:41 PM
2

She would still technically be a virgin but she should disclose it. You could say the same thing about the girl that’s made out with 10 guys but she would still be a virgin even though what she’s doing could be seen as promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:40 PM
1

The definition is the definition, you guys are the ones changing it and acting like all sexual acts are equal. Let’s be honest with ourselves, for most people having sex for the first time is much more significant than a blowjob.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:38 PM
2

Because not all sexual acts are equal. Dry humping isn’t the same as getting fucked raw.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:36 PM
2

But isn’t this dependent on where the person is? In some places a woman with a bodycount of 3 will be seen as a very modest woman, in some places she may be seen as ran through.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:35 PM
2

But if you cared about bodycount and wanted a girl with less baggage which one do you think you’d go for?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:33 PM
2

So why does mouth stuff count but mouth stuff doesn’t? Only full intercourse should count.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:26 PM
2

I meant for marriage or a serious relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:21 PM
2

Virginity is about vaginal intercourse, unless you’re part of the lgbt community it’s pretty weird to think oral can take your virginity, it’s like saying dry sex/humping can take one’s virginity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 04:20 PM

Would you guys rather be with a virgin woman thats only given oral to two guys or a woman that’s had full sex with one and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:51 PM
2

It’s a separate thing, giving a blowjob isn’t the same as getting fucked. For most straight people blowjobs and handjobs aren’t seen as going all the way
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:44 PM
2

So where do we draw the line? Is anytime somebodies genitals touched considered a body? If blowjobs and handjobs count why doesn’t making out count as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 12:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter