No_Apricot_2421 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful There is no answer to that. Averages dont work like that. You cant predict a single outcome. You can only predict a trend in a large number of outcomes. That is the reason people bet on horse races, because you cant predict who will win with certainity. That is why people try to predict who will win the Wimbledon and things like that and mostly fail. Well in a way you try to guess how accurate the average is by taking the deviation of each point, and calculating the variance and standard deviati…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 10:38 PM
2	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful There is just one outcome. It either will or will not. It's taking schrodinger's cat out of the box. You can bias a coin that it has 70% chance of getting a head and 30% chance of getting a tail. But on every flip you will only get a head or only get a tail. And you cant predict what you will get on each flip. If you are gambling with it, and say you do 10 flips, you can may as well get tails 9 times. 70% girls like guys who are 6 foot tall doesnt mean out of 10 girl you meet will, only 7 will l…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 10:33 PM
3	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful 🥲 That is exactly what I mean when I say you guys dont know to analyze data. I give this as example of what people's real surroundings look like which doesnt represent the large sample sizes. An athlete will have a lot of fitter people in their circle, so for them base "physical attrativeness" would be very high. Unlike a PhD student. You cant make an average of trends in celebrity couple and a relationship of someone who does an IT job. You cant draw a correlation between Nicki Minaj and Nick w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 07:43 PM
2	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful If you think entire countries are small sample size, you need to learn some basic maths. 😆 There are three million people withbtree not allergies in the US alone. Do you really think anyone woyld meeat more women in their life to actually be representative of the sample size of the whole world?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 07:31 PM
–	Desperate Housewives (and the "Soap Opera" Genre) Explains Why the Bad Boy Trope Continues. It is the same reason Batman like Catwoman. It is hot😆 I mean Bruce Wayne could definitely find a virgin woman whonwishes to settle down and do the dishes.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 06:58 PM
9	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful Depends on the ethnicity and funnily enough financial status of the people. It is more likely for a woman from a rich family to be taller than a man from a poor family. And I said in another comment, Dutch women are taller than Indian men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 06:40 PM
9	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful Yeah, but it needs proper analysis. And take metadata into consideration. Which most guys dont seem to do. Another example i can think of is than on average nuts are healthy. It doesnt mean it is also slightly healthy for people with a nut allergy. If they eat nuts they die. The statistics doesnt apply to them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 06:15 PM
5	Generalizing by Gender Is Lazy and Harmful Statistics dont work like that. The average number of hands of humans is 1.99. That does not mean that most people dont have 1% of their hand. It means most gave two hands, some have 1 hand and 0 hands. You need to be nuanced in analysis of statistics. It depends on your circle. Like I know a lot of women doing their phd's are single at 25. While statistics would say that most women are married at 25. Like most women are shorter than men. But if you are a pro womens basketballer chances are most…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 06:08 PM
1	You need to realise that for women, you need to compete with NO man as well as with the men she is attracted to Most self respecting men dont. And although I hate to say this. Most men are not self-respecting men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/06/25 05:40 PM