TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No_Philosopher_1171 Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by No_Philosopher_1171 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's the thing though, that would be a net negative for feminists, it's a win-win.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 04:49 AM
2

Say you're feminists. That's really it. 99% of the MRM population is feminist by its dictionary definition anyway. The feminists can't say anything against it because then they'd have to gatekeep feminism's definition, which their extremists use to allow their male hatred. It's all politicking.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 04:16 AM
2

First of all, they were sent to a fuctional but shitty prison in el Salvador, not a concentration camp. Get out of your emotions if you're not going to argue in good faith. Secondly, it's not white male conservatives, it's anti-(illegal)immigration conservatives, anti-(illegal)immigration people in general. Being white and male has nothing to do with it. Thirdly, as someone who approves of the illegal immigration enforcement, the women who are illegal immigrants should receive the same treatment…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:50 AM
1

Condom avoidance is simply understood. Extreme lust = temporary apathy to risks She said she's on the pill and you trusted her and/or the pill. Condom hurts him and/or her, and they have no education on condoms made of alternative materials That's it, it's not that complicated. People just being People.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:42 AM
1

They are in every part of the political spectrum, calling everything you dislike, "right wing" is why nobody takes lefties seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 03:34 AM
4

It was a dumb attempt to railroad proper satire. That's why they be getting downvotes.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:27 AM
1

Do it in writing, or another art form, that's why they're there.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 02:25 AM
1

I didn't read it as harsh in tone
/r/MensRights17/04/25 02:10 AM
1

Completely and utterly false even in the 1920s. Medieval times is often pointed out as a time like that and it's especially false then. Women had more or less rights depending on the location. But the Penitentials all but say that the husband and fathers are completely responsible for the women. So if your wife walked out in the woods cause she's crazy, you'd be punished if you didn't bring her back, and generally you couldn't get physical so you wouldn't be able to just drag her back, so if you…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:39 AM
1

but amazingly feminists advocate against same sex schools because they think it hurts women, like to claim men will be even more misogynistic and unable to talk to women but actually believe women learn a lot from men Unless it's a women's school.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:25 AM
1

I wouldn't care, school is for school. Hampton-Sydney College is a male only school.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:24 AM
6

Honestly a man would likely get the same reactions as long as the media didn't click bait it. You can't just blast kinky porn where everybody can hear you know.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:17 AM
9

What she said was dumb and strategically bad, but how will what she said result in dead men? She is a politician, don't be a misogynist, she knows exactly what she's doing, using the issue to further hatred against the male gender. You are defending hate speech. Anything but denunciation for such rhetoric should be deemed a defense of anti-male hate speech.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 11:30 PM
22

You're defending hate speech that will end with dead men. https://tenor.com/view/shame-gameofthrones-septa-septa-unela-gif-5547122 One does not remove pressure off immigrants by stating that over half the planet is responsible for criminal deviance. What was said is indefensible misandrist sexism.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 11:17 PM
2

Meh, it is what it is, some kid probably played with a hernia and sued a school, idk why else there'd be policies like that.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 10:54 PM
2

The internal one for males would be for an entirely different cause. You don't need to go inside anywhere to check the testes and groin for hernias and other protrusions.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 10:06 PM
3

I imagine there are other options, like an ultrasound or something, but you'd really just be dodging the coughing part.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:41 PM
10

It's our version of the mammogram, and they should actually be checked regularly imo.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:09 PM
8

Well, you know women are extremely violent and dangerous, they kill more people every year than sharks do in a period of 10 years.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:58 PM
17

That is not how these languages work. There was no additional information that indicates she spoke of a smaller population, all information implies she is talking about men as a whole and is promoting harmful stereotypes.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:29 PM
39

The only reason for that, "near monopoly," which is a hateful and horrible way to phrase that, is solely due to rhetoric and data manipulation. There is abundant, unbiased, research all over the internet and from reliable sources stating that violence is nearly 50/50 once they actually account for women, domestic violence for example. Your hatred of men is unwarranted.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:21 PM
48

That is not different. Go back to literature class, in all the history of language, such vague phrasing has been explicitly utilized to imply the whole. Specifically so that person can say, "you don't know what i meant by that," when confronted, while the average person now sees it as acceptable to promote hate and stereotypes.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:15 PM
3

You are allowed to mention, in such essays, what your actual opinion is. It also adds words for word count requirements.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:45 PM
3

That's a women's rights issue not a men's rights issue, what about the trans men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 05:34 PM
2

The first amendment protects your rights to peaceably assemble, even at night and around women. You know, because redcoats would enforce the opposite with violent arrests, and state governments were completely dissolved by royally appointed governors for peaceful assemblies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 05:24 PM
1

Intersectionality is the core issue, it's why academia is how it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:48 PM
2

Stop gatekeeping, the MRM is in no political or popular position to not take them into account. You will simply strengthen the feminists.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 08:52 AM
-13

No risks no rewards.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 08:24 AM
1

Who cares, Reeves is a Trojan Horse anyway. The public nature of the act is inappropriate, however, both males and females do this throughout pubescence as they learn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:50 AM
1

I mean... that's pretty much what Andrew Tate told people to do. Mentally fit people don't fall for that PUA bs.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:20 AM
4

Idc, she was a legitimate misandrist. Real believer in female supremacy. She was just a soft-spoken Andrea Dworkin. And it didn't change the following statement, because the statement was true whether she was talking about women or feminists, and whether she had actually said your quote or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:13 AM
2

They're the same as female prostitutes, always pay after. As for harmful effects? Well all the sex workers i know treat it like a job, and it doesn't often lend well for future intimate partners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:10 AM
1

Then idc, I only use him to suite my arguments in these specific topics, which come up way too often.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:07 AM
2

I suppose that's one way to describe that show.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:05 AM
1

You can find a feminist anywhere in the political spectrum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 07:04 AM
2

I don't think you know what "grifter" means.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:03 AM
1

A grifter to what? He's a TV host. Who is an expert on this stuff via experience.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:00 AM
2

That doesn't change the following statement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 06:58 AM
1

No, it's because society is gyno-centric and any threat against gynocentrism is an attack on society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 06:50 AM
1

That's exactly why they're more difficult to catch, you can't just stake out online forums.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:48 AM
1

I've found that masculinity and femininity are immutable properties which cannot be ascribed to people, but to objects, beliefs, philosophies, and certain actions. And there is no human on earth who is 100% masculine or 100% feminine. Every time a woman or girl looks at something and calls it pretty, that is masculinity, because aestheticism is masculine, it is purely physical and everything physical is masculine. Everytime you say "hello" to someone you exhibit femininity, because it is purely …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 06:15 AM
127

Sky is blue, grass is green.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:07 AM
1

From the organization which continues to show -Cuties- the softcore pedoporn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 06:03 AM
1

It won't matter if it does pass, that is entirely a state matter, who may vote. Also proof of US citizenship documents include more than a passport and Birth Certificate, you can get one from a number of government institutions from the DMV to a SS Office.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:48 AM
1

I'm confused, 10k is plenty for a down payment on a house, do you not have a job? Is your credit under 600?
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:45 AM
1

I shant rest until all men can wear the houppelande and chaperones in daily, business, and political settings again!
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:41 AM
1

Fines and/or prison for 5-20 years. Similar punishment to other speech crimes like Sedition and Pergery.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:35 AM
2

That's because the women are more difficult to catch. Chris Hansen himself stated that the female pedophile is a whole other monster, extremely difficult to find as a victim is actually required, and they rarely come out. It's near impossible to trick a female pedophile. (Paraphrased).
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:31 AM
0

The most important thing is to defend men from the use of the word "patriarchy," the feminist use of it explicitly places all bad things in the world on males. And to shame those who use it and those who talk shit about males, as one would shame a white person using the n-word. Encourage non gendered language in laws and policies, or for them to explicitly include males.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:21 AM
1

That's a men's fashion issue overrall really. It's not like there's that many options anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 05:09 AM
2

That is a literary device called "situational Irony"
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:03 AM
3

ShoeOnHead is not a Marxist. And that is explicitly what marx believed and the philosophy he promoted.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:58 AM
3

The core of the problem must be fixed, they are not the core of the problem. Crime and punishment are not connected to the core.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:52 AM
2

This is something to report to licensing boards, the school board, and the principal. Skip the teachers in the command chain.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:51 AM
4

Bell Hooks didn't explain why women hate men. She stated that women are superior and any unfeminized boy will become her abusive father (paraphrased). Hooks infantilized and pathologized men and boys in a way that seemed like empathy, but was really superiority imo. The reason why most stay silent is because most hate is behind a comedic mask. Then if one does speak out they receive all the treatment you mention, and further dismissals. The core of the problem is intersectional feminism. Any Dwo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 03:57 AM
7

Christina Hoff Sommers goes into detail on, what I'm now calling, Steinemist Data; named after Gloria Steinem who almost single handedly fabricated the anorexia epidemic. Most of the government statistics for rape come directly from biased feminist sources. Christina Hoff Sommers reminds us that the US BJS (Bureau of Justice Statistics) number, back in the times of the college rape crisis, put the high estimate at about 1/64. Whilst feminist sources all say 1/4 women are raped. In -The War Again…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 03:11 AM
12

Intersectionalism is the root cause. It allows anyone from a feminist-communist-nazi-manhater, to a feminist-capitalist-socialist-potatoe, to claim they're just an "Intersectional Feminist."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:19 AM
1

It is an anecdote to a recognized victimhood. Which means it can be used among the most important arguments for the MRM. The fact that they came to us to post it is very important, as opposed to the feminists who would victim blame him with PaTriArChY. If you wish to discuss the finer points and goals of the court and justice system, and everything else, as i said, you can just make a post. Are you an MRA?
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:15 AM
-1

So you're just illiterate? You don't see how the post relates to Men's Rights and Issues?
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:04 AM
-1

Ain't nothing stopping you from posting.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:01 AM
2

Do you have such a feminist? Karen DeCrow is the closest I can think of, and Idk if I'd call her socialist. Though the government thought she was a communist at one point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 01:56 AM
-1

It is nothing but foolish self-sabotage against the movement to turn these people away on such a basis. If you don't wish to participate, then do not participate. If you're a MRA, and do not want them here, then be professional and give an alternative.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 01:54 AM
2

🤷
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:32 AM
0

I think you're just looking for sympathy and attention. And we should give it. Both for political reputation in our favor, and for a fellow.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:35 PM
1

That was not acceptable in 1977 either, they'd get beaten up in public.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:31 PM
1

Sounds like OP's a Russian bot to me. Why would russia run a page with a main object of ending conscription? It's not going to hurt western armies, they're mainly volunteer. A 5yo could do a better SpyOp.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:21 PM
29

Yes, it has been stated that more fathers are needed in the home for generations.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:12 PM
2

If there's no chemistry within the first sentences, move on to the next one, it's not coming.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 09:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter