TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No_Sale_4564 Archive

View 0 posts and 84 comments by No_Sale_4564 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

This is it. HOWEVER- the amount of men that exist where they truly add a "benefit" to the marriage and dont become an overall net negative on the woman is small. Shut the fuck up, women are no fucking better than men, by any measure, there are just as many shitty women as there are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:31 PM
2

Women are held to higher emotional standards than men, are expected to contribute to more housework than men and are held to MUCH higher parenting standards. According to: women/"feminist studies"...Always feels over reals.. "Feminist studies"/women report: men all bad, women all good! Fucking shocker!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:27 PM
4

Women work full time like men yet still do the majority of housework and childcare and planning/mental load, women consistently meet the higher emotional standards set in relationships compared to men in terms of social and emotional intelligence and women overall act like better parents (because we are held to higher standards). False. Women do all of this while putting more effort into our appearance because "men are so visual" despite its much easier for us to be overweight compared to men. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:24 PM
1

Women are held to higher emotional standards than men, are expected to contribute to more housework than men and are held to MUCH higher parenting standards. According to: women/"feminist studies"...Always "feels over reals".." "Feminist studies"/women report: men all bad, women all good! Fucking shocker!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:22 PM
–

Just because women feel it doesn’t make it true. Say it louder for feminists everywhere!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:19 PM
–

This is it. HOWEVER- the amount of men that exist where they truly add a "benefit" to the marriage and dont become an overall net negative on the woman is small. Shut the fuck up, women are no fucking better than men, by any measure, there are just as many shitty women as there are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:18 PM
11

The male loneliness epidemic is purely a result of male deficiency and the refusal of men to date and marry the women that are their matches. HAHAHAHAHAHA... In all seriousness though, your poor son..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 04:29 AM
1

The male loneliness epidemic is purely a result of male deficiency and the refusal of men to date and marry the women that are their matches. HAHAHAHAHAHA... In all seriousness though, your poor son..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 03:52 AM
1

Clinton's "third way," embracing neo-liberal economics and trickle down theory but adding progressive social politics Rainbow-Capitalism. Government-"progress-isivsm" has always been purely performative. Just like with corporations. The distinction that matters the most is: class. The world over. Funny how those saviors you speak of will drone all day about/emphasize every type of privilege except wealth/class-privilege, the single most significant divider..
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 12:34 AM
1

No disagreement on that from me, too bad that's not at all what we're working towards... Also, that's assuming the basics are provided for all first, from there you materialistic status-chasers can go nuts, and work as hard as you want for as much as you want!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 11:31 PM
1

Ours is not a perfect meritocracy, of course, but we are working towards it. It is our end goal Just re-reading this bit...you can't possibly believe that? No one could be that* delusional. The "end goal" is a techno-dystopian-nightmare that will make 1984 look like Disneyland you fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 09:59 PM
1

Usually either mental illness or drug addictions are the biggest factors contributing to homelessness A lot of that mental illness and addiction is downstream of problems caused by the capitalist model, despair, hopelessness, isolation, etc etc...much like a lot of the petty crime people like you also love to frame as merely moral failings....Addictions/crimes of despair. The for-profit housing market is the direct cause of homelessness, and the lack of public housing and adequate medical/mental…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 09:30 PM
1

Lol, I'm sure to defenders of capitalism the U.S does look like a utopian paradise!... All them lazy good-for-nothing homeless and poor bums deserve their lot-in-life, and billionaires deserve theirs as well...(They simply: "worked that much harder than everyone else combined!" afterall, amirite???...) I myself am a socialist who believes: basic nutrition, basic healthcare, basic housing and education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives in a properly functional…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:56 PM
1

But let's both agree that choosing to abstain from the current system has only resulted in it worsening. Can't really agree on that tbh, their system is built on (the illusion of) public consensus. If we take that from them at least we've done away with that charade... Giving them any claim towards/semblance of legitimacy isn't helping anything...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:45 PM
2

Can you name a country for which capitalism is functioning well?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:06 PM
2

In our current system? Yes. Farms should be local/communal property/shared work co-operatives. Especially for basic of nutrition. And yes, even if (even when) some don't pull their full weight, to answer your next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:00 PM
1

All rent-seeking behavior "passive-income' is inherently predatory. There are no "good" landlords, that is an oxy-moron. The fucking title itself should be everyone's first clue!!!.. "Blessed-be our grand and noble LORDS of the Land!" "Humbly, we lowly serfs lay down our meager-wages beforre them! In the hopes that we may..." smh. Shit should have died off with the fucking middle-ages for fucks sake!!..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:55 PM
0

I did reply to your dumb shit, it's all there...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:54 PM
1

All rent-seeking behavior "passive-income' is inherently predatory. There are no "good" landlords, that is an oxy-moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:48 PM
1

what's your practical solution? Who said I had one? (cough guillotines cough) I was more responding to your implication that LLs are some benign class who "provide" some noble "service" to society or some bull-shit. They are parasites land-leeching off of "society.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:30 PM
1

Opting out makes it all functionally worse. Naah, their system is built on (the illusion of) public consensus. If we take that from them at least we've done away with that charade... Giving them any claim towards/semblance of legitimacy isn't helping anything...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:25 PM
1

It doesn't exist. Until it exists, landlords are going to... It doesn't exist because our "society" caters to/is built around land-leeching profits! LOL Landlordsleeches are scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:22 PM
1

If you are still buying into party-politics at all you are part of the problem. They all need to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:14 PM
3

LOL suuure, let's look at who is more valued in Ukraine for a modern example.. All those poor women being dragged off the srteets thrown into the meat-grinder! Like they are merely disposable property or something! Disgraceful At least the men were safely evacuated and get to shop and date and party in the safe countries... Wait...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:11 PM
1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, basic housing and education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:04 PM
1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, basic housing and education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:02 PM
1

We already have more than enough to achieve this "idealistic fantasy," the scarcity/poverty in "first-world" nations today is curated and maintained artificially/deliberately. The limiting factor is that we've structured a societypyramid-scheme that includes basic nutrition, basic healthcare, and education and is even largely built-on housing profits... Those on top of this pyramid-scheme would lose a lot of their wealth/power/status if these profit-models were eliminated/the basics were properl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:00 PM
1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival, nor their opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 06:54 PM
1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival, nor their opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 06:54 PM
–

We already have more than enough to achieve this "idealistic fantasy," the scarcity/poverty in "first-world" nations today is curated and maintained artificially/deliberately. The limiting factor is that we've structured a societypyramid-scheme that includes basic nutrition, basic healthcare, and education and is even largely built-on housing profits... Those on top of this pyramid-scheme would lose a lot of their wealth/power/status if these profit-models were eliminated/the basics were properl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 06:52 PM
-1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival, nor their opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 06:17 PM
-1

In a properly functional (ie: actual) society (supposedly "modern"/'first-world") basic nutrition, basic healthcare, education (including post-secondary) should have absolutely no profit-incentives. With housing for ex: Government should provide every man, woman, and child in need with free basic accommodation (think: 1/2 bdrm/bachelor style apts) with anything beyond that available in a secondary/voluntary luxury market. Nobody "deserves" to profit off of others basic survival, nor their opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 06:17 PM
0

if he had used all that time and money to buy a row of apartment buildings, use his own sweat to replace all the carpet, repaint it, change all the lights and plumbing until it was a great place to live, he would feel ok living off the rent. Landlords are parasites and there is no justification for them, or for rent. All forms of passive income/"rent" are theft/exploitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:34 PM
6

I love this idea that men's desires from women (a fucking peaceful/ supportive lover!) = "bang-maid." Fourth-wave feminism has really fucked a generation of women possibly beyond repair... If men all want "bangmaids" I guess that means women all want: "Daddy's wallets" huh? Seems about the opposite equivalent level of hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:42 AM
1

I love this idea that men's desires from women (a fucking peaceful/ supportive partner!) = "bang-maid." Fourth-wave feminism has really fucked a generation of women possibly beyond repair... If men want "bangmaids" I guess hat mean's women want Daddy's wallets" huh? Seems the opposite equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:26 AM
2

First mistake is pretending that hard-work (and not luck, connections and the circumstances of your upbringing..) is the main determining factor in success/"economic background"...not the case. Secondly, a big part of what motivates many men to pursue status/material wealth/lifestyle in the first place is attracting women, yet another reason why more women going for that cash/girl-bossing upsets the dating/marriage balance...Men as a general rule do not consider women's status as a (primary) fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:21 AM
1

Elimination of paternity fraud > women's feelings. Bingo. Shut the thread/entire discussion down henceforth. There is no rebuttal to this fact. (We all know why women really oppose this anyways, and it ain't "hurt feeeelings" either..) Once more though: Elimination of paternity fraud > women's feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 03:24 AM
1

Still arguing with yourself.. You are hopeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:48 PM
1

And I am sure they are. They may be chasing him for money or his status, but like I said, that's true for most rich powerful men that aren't physically attractive...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:46 PM
–

And I am sure they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:44 PM
–

Not offended at all, fuck Trump. The only poon Trump ever got was paid for... Yeah, that's what I just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:42 PM
1

Men can't claim they're desirable if no one wants them Noone has been arguing with you about that you drooling fucking moron. We're saying women's desires/standards/expectations and their egos have been distorted/manipulated by external factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:19 PM
–

But if red-pill says 80% of women only want (the top) 20% of men Then average men are undesirable by definition It doesn't matter that you feel they should be, your feelings don't determine the desirability for men Only female selection Yep. This is you stating that the current state of affairs is fine and dandy..(ie: not totally distorted.) Your little link is just you contradicting yourself. Thanks for playing though
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 03:02 PM
1

But if red-pill says 80% of women only want (the top) 20% of men Then average men are undesirable by definition It doesn't matter that you feel they should be, your feelings don't determine the desirability for men Only female selection
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 02:59 PM
–

Cool beans.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:20 PM
–

Wow, way to miss the point... I'm not going to try (in vain) to thoroughly explain what I'm talking about to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:18 PM
–

LOL, don't kid yourself, Drumpf has a never-ending stream of 10/10 women throwing themselves at him 24/7... (Obvious golddiggers/status chasers, but that's the same as most rich/powerful men that aren't physically attractive..)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:08 PM
–

upset the natural order... This is fucking disturbing, dude. "Disturbing" how? Duuude. Do you not understand that there exists a natural balance in the pairing of men and women?... (Like attracting like, looksmatch..etc) We are still animals after-all, (our pretending otherwise aside..) all other animals form a natural balance between males/females... Can you not conceive that external factors could influence or upset that balance?...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 01:07 PM
–

upset the natural order... This is fucking disturbing, dude. "Disturbing" how?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 12:57 PM
1

LOL, don't kid yourself, Drumpf has a never-ending stream of 10/10 women throwing themselves at him 24/7... (Obvious golddiggers/status chasers, but still..)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 12:20 PM
–

Read through all of your comments/replies Op and it comes down to you believing that just because things are the way are are means it must be just the natural order of things, (common femosphere delusion) as though nothing could possibly warp women's collective realistic standards/upset the natural order... What we men are trying to get through your collective thick skulls is that that between dating aps, social media, rom-coms, sugar-baby/onlyfans culture etc etc.. that that is exactly what has…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 11:04 AM
–

Read through all of your comments/replies Op and it comes down to you believing that just because things are the way are are means it must be just the natural order of things, (common femosphere delusion) as though nothing could possibly warp women's collective realistic standards/upset the natural order... What we men are trying to get through your collective thick skulls is that that between dating aps,social media,rom-coms, sugar-baby/onlyfans culture etc etc.. that that is exactly what has h…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 10:48 AM
1

Read through all of your comments/replies Op and it comes down to you believing that just because things are the way are are means it must be the natural order of things, (common femosphere delusion) as though nothing could possibly warp women's collective realistic standards/upset the natural order... What we men are trying to get trough your collective thick skulls is that that between dating aps,social media,rom-coms/sugar-baby/onlyfans culture etc etc.. that that is exactly what has happened…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 08:18 AM
2

LOL, 60-70% of women are fat. If only 99% of women weren't ...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 01:56 PM
1

No, they shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 01:53 PM
-2

All men pay for it, one way or another. "Ain't no free pussy.."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 03:49 AM
1

Naah.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 03:38 AM
0

This is probably one of the most honest posts ever on this sub. There it is, gents': the modern woman's mindset revealed. Freud was bang-on, just a massive inferiority complex/chip on their shoulder and subsequent projection/lashing-out, most succinctly summarized as: "Penis-Envy." Literally all their pissing and moaning and stupid shit-testing has ever been. The only thing Op got wrong is that she and all women who think like her (most women) make themselves miserable. Op, you'd be much more mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 03:21 AM
–

Women only date/marry up (on average at least..) Cope harder lol. Your opinion is nothing but arrogance/entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:26 PM
3

Yeah, simps are a big part of the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:40 PM
–

Typical delusional (entitled/arrogant) modern-women's (yaaasss' queen dumbass) attitude. (blegh, get the fuck over yourselves already! Shit is beyond tiresome/played-out...) Newslash darlin': average men typically marry/date average women. Most y'all ain't special, *sure-as-*fuck not "vastly more..." anything than most men. Pull your fucking head out of your own ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:36 PM
10

Are my standards unrealistic?... No. All the men saying so are wrong...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 03:28 PM
1

What's the reason to remove the term? Misandrist-dogwhistle, pointlessly gendered/divisive. There are already words describing the behaviors/attitudes you listed..."mansplaining" (puke) = condescending etc... 3. Toxic beliefs, attitudes and behaviors know no gender, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 02:57 AM
–

What's the reason to remove the term? There are already words describing the behaviors/attitudes you listed... Toxic beliefs, attitudes and behaviors know no gender, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 02:45 AM
5

There's no such thing as "toxic masculinity" you are absolutely correct, it is yet another new(fem)-speak misandrist dog-whistle (like: man-splaining/spreading etc) and you should dismiss anyone using such terms unironically outright. Toxic beliefs attitudes and behaviors know no gender, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:53 AM
3

Yeah yeah, there are already words describing the behaviors/attitudes you listed... We do not need newspeak umbrella-terminology or to break things down into smaller and smaller categories for the sake of "progress"? or something ..(sowing further division.)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:47 AM
1

What did I make up? Biased how?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:25 AM
1

I didn't coin the term "Newspeak" I tacked on the "fem" (short for feminist) because feminists are the ones currently pushing this bullshit pointlessly gendered/intentionally divisive/antagonistic language for their misandrist purposes: "toxic-masculinity"/"mansplaining" etc... Fuck it and fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:13 AM
2

There's no such thing as "toxic masculinity," Op is absolutely correct, it is yet another new(fem)-speak misandrist dog-whistle (like: man-splaining/spreading etc) and you should dismiss anyone using such terms unironically outright. Toxic attitudes and behaviors are not gender-specific, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:06 AM
3

There's no such thing as "toxic masculinity," Op is absolutely correct, it is yet another new(fem)-speak misandrist dog-whistle (like: man-splaining/spreading etc) and you should dismiss anyone using such terms unironically outright. Toxic attitudes and behaviors are not gender-specific, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:06 AM
3

There's no such thing as "toxic masculinity" you are absolutely correct, it is yet another new(fem)-speak misandrist dog-whistle (like: man-splaining/spreading etc) and you should dismiss anyone using such terms unironically outright. Toxic attitudes and behaviors are not gender-specific, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 01:05 AM
4

Chad will pump-and-dump Becky putting in zero effort ("uuuse for sex!" in fem-speak) and then go on to marry Stacy. (Girl-boss/yasss-queeen/bad-bitch)) Becky marries wine and anti-depressants... "Men all pigs, where are all the good men?" etc etc... See: present-times.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 05:47 AM
1

Chad will pump-and-dump Becky putting in zero effort "uuuse for sex!" in fem-speak and then go on to marry Stacy. Becky marries wine and anti-depressants...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 05:42 AM
1

Chad marries Stacy. Becky marries wine and anti-depressants...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 05:33 AM
7

From beta-females.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 02:01 AM
6

From women who aren't Stacies this shouldn't be an unreasonable ask (in fact, should be expected,) the fact non-Stacies (like yourself) see this as "Chad treatment" is the issue/problem today. Y'all average gals feel like y'all above average guys. Y'all ain't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:40 AM
1

No because there is none, most men can't/won't ever have the kind of mutual-desire sex they naturally desire because of the conditions (-women in the-) present day culture have set, and the subsequent hoe-flation that has occurred. "women gatekeep sex, men gatekeep relationships ..." and all that, true words. TLDR the average woman (like yourself) now considers herself so far above average men and views/treats all sex with average men as transactional/deserving of compensation...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:04 PM
1

I re-post all unduly-downvoted comments. Young men will do almost anything to get a woman to sleep with them. I mean they prefer that the woman wanted him but ultimately he is willing to settle for a warm body and will go any length to lie, cheat or manipulate the situation in any way. Where did I say anything contrary to this? Men are forced to deal with women's (socially conditionined/inflated) spoiled desires for access.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:03 PM
–

use them for sex = "I have a vagina, give me money/treats!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:36 AM
–

No because there is none, most men can't/won't ever have the kind of mutual-desire sex they naturally desire because of the conditions (-women in the-) present day culture have set, and the subsequent hoe-flation that has occurred. "women gatekeep sex, men gatekeep relationships ..." and all that, true words. TLDR the average woman (like yourself) now considers herself so far above average men and views/treats all sex with average men as transactional/deserving of compensation...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:30 AM
–

I re-post all unduly-downvoted comments. Young men will do almost anything to get a woman to sleep with them. I mean they prefer that the woman wanted him but ultimately he is willing to settle for a warm body and will go any length to lie, cheat or manipulate the situation in any way. Where did I say anything contrary to this? Men are forced to deal with women's (socially conditionined/inflated) spoiled desires for access.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:18 AM
–

Young men will do almost anything to get a woman to sleep with them. I mean they prefer that the woman wanted him but ultimately he is willing to settle for a warm body and will go any length to lie, cheat or manipulate the situation in any way. Where did I say anything contrary to this? Men are forced to deal with women's (socially conditionined/inflated) spoiled desires for access.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:17 AM
–

That's like a woman saying: "men never actually like women for who they are, they are always just using women for sex. Except nope, it's not like that, at all, and you are in fact further reinforcing Op's points. See, men, unlike women, do not (naturally/instinctively) see sex as something women "give" to men (in exchange for: ___,) but rather as something a couple shares in together, as evidenced by the fact most men would prefer sex with a partner who desires him/sex as much as he does her. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:14 AM
–

That's like a woman saying: "men never actually like women for who they are, they are always just using women for sex. Except nope, it's not like that, at all, and you are in fact further reinforcing Op's points. See, men, unlike women, do not (naturally/instinctively) see sex as something women "give" to men (in exchange for: ___,) but rather as something a couple shares in together, as evidenced by the fact most men would prefer sex with a partner who desires him/sex as much as he does her. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter