TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

No_Wishbone6229 Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by No_Wishbone6229 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm not questioning your qualifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 03:41 AM
0

Do you have a source for this? edit: not that I don't believe you, its just your pumping out facts in dense paragraphs and I would love to see the concise data
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 03:04 AM
0

No, she means women will look for positive personality traits when she is looking for a long term partner but personality traits of men men she is only interested in having casual sex, she will be more lenient about them. Sexual attraction will be important in both of these scenarios. Women want to have sex with men they find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 02:48 AM
6

Thanks for sharing. Sounds like he was a great dad and worked hard, it’s a shame he wasn’t able to retire and relax.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:47 PM
13

Women both chase gold diggers and support bums. Sleep with anyone and don't enjoy sex. Refuse to have children because we are selfish and are biologically programed to remain in the home and raise children have control over society and are incapable of managing men's work and on and on and on What are you looking for here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:34 PM
1

is it? Im not just saying this, this is data. What exactly do you mean? It kind of just sounds like you said "Your a global phenomenon!" Is this based in reality or just you sticking your tongue out and saying, "Nuh uh!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 03:42 PM
–

Do you worry that her lack of authentic sexual attraction might cause issues? My mother married my dad and later confessed to me that her own mother said just suck it up, basically, when she expressed her lack of physical attraction. this caused problems years later when they were already invested in the marriage. Ultimately, a woman should decide what's best for her but it seems so bleak to just accept the sacrifice of passion and genuine sexual intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 12:46 AM
3

In this scenario, are we assuming the husband respects his wife and likes her on a personal level rather than just a sexual one?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 12:29 AM
2

Overall, women are spending on average 14 hours a week on child care, up from 10 hours a week in 1965. Men are also doing more child care — about eight hours a week on average in 2016, compared with 2.5 back in 1965. ok. We have to be done here. You're just taking up my time at this point for no reason
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:54 PM
2

Ya, I have to agree with you. Things rarely have a singular cause
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:52 PM
1

In each individual interaction, one person has the power, but I’m talking about as a whole. Men want women more than women want men, and men are the one asking out women. Why do men want women more than women want men? I’m talking about the world where both had equal interest in the other and similar hormones that would make approaching 50-50. I'm not sure I understand what you mean here, can you clarify?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:46 PM
1

Why wouldn't we have the power in determining who we date? What's the alternative?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:37 PM
2

I didn't put it into google to form an argument against it, I put it into google to find the source of the information. It was blatantly false. Now you think you have the right to demand information from me? You lied. You got caught in a clear and obvious lie. You cannot even acknowledge that. How can anyone take someone seriously after that?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:56 PM
–

Its not even cherry picking when you guys use social media or reddit in lieu of verifiable information. If you know that you can't defend your stance with anything but more subjectivity what you are doing is lying
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:27 PM
2

Because you lied. if you have to lie to defend your stance you should be called out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:20 PM
–

Why did you quote block this? These are your words
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:17 PM
–

there are uncountable amount of guys in the comments using memes, unsavory language to call him gay and feminine, (which we all know its the worst thing to call a man because apparently there isn't any thingworse in this world than being a woman) or other insults. (Many ks of likes too) Mostly, these are men who needed these procedures very much indeed and had very good results , and one can imagine improved their dating prospects and confidence . ?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:16 PM
2

Lack of meaningful compensation and recognition for the essential role of caregiving in our society is probably the elephant in the room here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:54 PM
2

Fathers in intact families participate in parenting at a rate of 100%, while doing the majority of providing for families. I can't stress this enough, THE ONLY PEOPLE viewing women as wholly responsible for the physical and mental load of raising children... are man-hating feminists. Grace you but not for me. Upon having a child, men take on the greater burden of paid and non-paid labor and suffer more severe loss of personal care and leisure time (combined), in all years but one (2023). When in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:49 PM
3

The boldness in your clear contradictions point to an intention of purposefully disrupting this conversation. Significant and majority are vague terms so here is the actual data Globally, women perform about 76% of all unpaid care work, Nationally they provide two thirds of it. this means that women provide the majority of care work while also participating in the workforce at a rate of 75% Women are doing the very thing you say is an unrealistic feat for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:32 PM
2

This has nothing to do with logical fallacies, your statements are blatantly false. See the way you provide a caveat that women choose to do this labor? Is this an attempt to justify the lack of recognition for a crucial role in society so that women can remain uncompensated for their contributions?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:18 PM
1

This is completely inconsistent with the undeniable evidence of clear labor statistics and data. Someone saying something you don’t like on Reddit has no bearing on your claim that women do not account for the majority of the people who provide care work both nationally and globally.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:12 PM
-1

With women there is no off-ramp like with men. The one at the top can ostracize and bully with no realistic consequences besides social shaming that lowers her social status - but when said bully has her peers on her side, that option is nullified This is an outrageous and unverifiable claim. If your argument relies on blatant falsehoods, your claim is not credible
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:05 PM
0

Because this denies the existence of the labor of childcare. Women are viewed as wholly responsible for the physical and mental load of raising children. Time spent on this messy endeavor limits women's ability to participate in the workforce.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:42 PM
-1

This doesn't make a lot of sense in the light that competition between men is often direct and results in more violence. Women have power struggles but they tend to be indirect and do not result in dangerous situations. There is an argument to be made about the psychological harm that women's power struggles cause, but its hardly representative of the idea that women are more vicious or worse in this aspect
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:39 PM
3

Well in that case I must concede that we actually agree here. Its actually a very interesting conversation and it seems to be directly tied to the advent of agriculture, a fairly new human practice on the timeline of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:30 PM
–

Humans want value and acceptance. This is a biological drive associated with our natural tendency to collaborate and our very unique ability for shared intentionality. You are talking about men and women while ignoring the fact that they are both humans with needs that are not restricted to gender
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:28 PM
–

Women already had authority in that role, childbearing and caregiving gave them natural leverage in society. They were the “legitimate parent,” with men expected to labor and provide resources so women could focus on raising the next generation. What is the natural leverage that single mothers have in this society? If being a mother alone does not grant you authority, that means the authority you claim we have belongs only to a woman's husband and not the woman herself
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:26 PM
–

You are not explicitly defending the patriarchy but you are not claiming it is disadvantageous to men and women. You only prefaced this in order to excuse yourself from sincere conversation. Everything in your post points to an acceptance of this system. But again, at any point in time, you can refute this and clarify your stance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:23 PM
1

I blame this on the prevalence of inequality more than I do men. People are meant to collaborate. The idea that there is a fundamental difference between us is a symptom of the patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:20 PM
1

A calmer, safer, more harmonious world is a world where women are granted the same rights and privileges as men. Anthropologists conclude that when women are viewed as equal, men tend to be less violent, happier, and economically secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:18 PM
–

What authority are women granted for the crucial role of caregiving and childbearing? These things are fundamental to a society
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:16 PM
–

Your defense of the patriarchy means you understand the concepts associated with the system, I assume. You disagree with the idea that women's sexuality should be repressed and men's sexuality is natural? How does you belief in sexual freedom for both men and women fit inside the narrative of the patriarchy? If what I said was untrue, clarify your stance on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:11 PM
4

The counter argument is that your view is not representative of anything but your own culture. There is undeniable deviation from this view of men and women's roles in society. This does not point to biological causes in this behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:08 PM
–

This is a patriarchal tenant. This is why promiscuous women are shamed while men are expected to exhibit this trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:05 PM
–

In societies where child rearing is viewed as the responsibility of the community and not a chore to be delegated to women we see an increase in parental bonding for both women and men
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:04 PM
–

I treat women and men like they are identical. You argue that men should repress their sexuality and adhere to submissive roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:01 PM
–

What I listed is typical behavior given the prevalence of it across all cultures and societies. A trait that monogamy and the assumption that men's sexuality is natural and women's should be repressed does not have
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:57 PM
1

If this were true the prevalence of deviations from this narrative would not exist in all cultures, societies, and eras of humanity. Glaring issues seem to stem from trying to force this narrative rather than reinforcing its legitimacy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:57 PM
–

men and women have sexualities that are fundamentally distinct from each other. These differences exist on an innate physiological level. This statement lacks credibility. Sex drive, orientation, fantasy life, kink interests all show broad variability within each sex. Many women have higher libidos than many men, many men are sexually selective, many women pursue casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:53 PM
2

You have every opportunity to address what I said about mothers' role in society. The lack of authentic back and forth conversation doesn't leave much room for other explanations. The absurdity of your description of women and women's perspectives paint a very clear picture here
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:49 PM
–

Because this is an indefensible position. Instead the conversation relies on obfuscation related to delegitimizing a woman's right to sexual freedom, access to capital, and reproduction rights. Men fully understand that mothers and caregivers are essential roles worthy of recognition, dignity, and compensation. Women cannot be recognized as having value if the goal is to maintain male control over reproduction. In order to benefit from their contributions while denying them rights. Unpaid labor
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:37 PM
–

This is irrational. Your points have no logical conclusion other than that you think women deserve to be punished. A solution would require you to identify a problem that needs to be solved. The problem you have is that women want to be afforded the same rights and privileges than men and a solution to that problem is demonizing women and disrupting sincere and honest conversations
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:14 PM
–

You have a very optimistic view of how the future will play out
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:03 PM
–

As long as a woman provides sex her role as a mother is accepted? You will allow your woman to bear your children so long as you have regular access to her body for gratification
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:58 PM
–

You can’t articulate a solution that women can provide because scapegoating women is your solution
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:52 PM
–

What does a legitimate solution look like if we go with your argument that women should shoulder the responsibility of solving issues for men under the patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:39 PM
–

You’re unsure if your own argument requires evidence or legitimacy? Or are you unsure if it would hold up to legitimate scrutiny
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:26 PM
–

Irrationally is the only tool for defending this point of view. It’s why people with this argument never provide sources and avoid the very existence of differing perspectives
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:07 PM
–

Feminism must be evil in order for you to deny its merits
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:46 PM
1

None of this is true. Your hyperbole belies your intentions. In order for you to justify a solution that only benefits men, your argument only requires you disrupt any conversation surrounding equality. Even you don’t believe this sincerely or your argument would include legitimate information. The desperation of your insistence that women are evil is all you have
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:43 PM
1

Of course. How else could you possibly justify this argument that women should take on the burden of caregiving without recognition or adequate compensation while also arguing they should not have the right to participate in the workforce unless you deny women’s humanity
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:22 PM
–

Any rational mind can recognize your argument as absurd. This isn’t about convincing me, it’s about maintaining your view so you don’t have to confront the ethicality of your solution that denies women equality
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:15 PM
1

Dehumanizing women is the only way you can justify your argument that women don’t deserve respect and recognition for their caregiving roles in society and ALSO should not be afforded the opportunity to participate in the workforce. If women aren’t the monsters, this stance is clearly unethical
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:12 PM
–

She is responsible for your words then
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:07 PM
1

If women aren’t monsters, your argument against affording them the same rights and privileges as men completely falls apart
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:00 PM
1

If women aren’t evil, your behavior is your responsibility. This is why you all seem so desperate to paint women as inhuman
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:43 PM
–

No, this is an anthropological observation that is consistent across time and cultures
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:23 PM
1

Again with the hyperbole. Your solution excludes women’s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:23 PM
1

The underlying argument rests on the idea that men can only win if women lose
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:10 PM
3

Why do you think this conversation stays so “weird” whenever it comes up? Lack of holistic thinking. An honest conversation about abuse in relationships would benefit us both. Taking a stance against the idea that victims should be blamed for their own abuse must be authentic in order for a solution to be feasible. If men can only win if women lose and vice versa, peace is not a realistic goal
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:09 PM
–

Men tend to benefit in societies that do not repress women’s sexuality because those societies foster lower violence, healthier pair bonds, higher paternal investment, better sexual satisfaction, and stronger economies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:03 PM
10

God bless you. I am blown away by the idea that some of these men have about female sexuality and how closely it aligns with Victorian thinking. Men and women like to have sex. What these guys are talking about is oppressed sexuality, they just don't realize its their own
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:01 PM
1

The lack of authenticity in your arguments make it clear that you goal is not to find a solution to this problem but instead exploit this issue in order to justify taking no sincere action. Its beneficial to hate women. Why would any man help take on the burden of childcare in a society that has granted them the privilege of freedom from paternal responsibilities? This is why your arguments are so hyperbolic and absurd. You don't have to believe in the sincerity of your own argument. You just ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:53 PM
–

Ya, it seems like its very important to you that women are evil. Without this factor, you would have to take ownership of your words and actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:43 PM
–

The male loneliness epidemic is the consequence of men denying mothers a place in this world
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:39 PM
–

The theme I'm seeing in the comments here is an inability to see either men or women in a positive light. Women are monsters. Men are helpless against them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:37 PM
–

Can’t speak for all men, but I’d rather be SA’d multiple times a year for the rest of my life than continue being undesirable romantically jesus dude. how do you have so little self respect. This is your argument for why women should empathize with men?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:35 AM
-4

It seems like you missed an opportunity to express your views with dignity and information. You didn't seem to want to have a sincere conversation with me about the value of motherhood in our society and how it correlates with birthrate decline but you gleefully jumped at the chance to argue with a woman. Its seems like you are searching for a villain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:33 AM
-2

Men like you are what we are missing out on huh? I don't think any woman will regret not dating someone who acts like a high school bully when she looks back on her life
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:16 AM
–

Some countries are already actively investing into artificial wombs. What happens when corporations are allowed to 3d print new humans? They are not going to make the environment safer for women because that is expensive. Artificial wombs are cheaper. What happens to women when they lose their main bargaining chip? Why rob the lurkers of comments like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:06 AM
2

Nihilism is your response to my assertion that women deserve to be respected and valued as mothers. Male loneliness epidemic indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:55 AM
3

How not? Tell me about your views on single mothers
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:54 AM
3

I wish you the very best in your future society that eliminates women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:48 AM
3

I think this is the third time a man has responded by saying “society is safe so women should feel safe giving birth” And yet birthdates are still declining globally. Women aren’t at higher risk of death in today’s society as compared to previous societies. But becoming pregnant carries the risk of poverty, stigmatization, abuse, and workload. The safest version of this society for women is one where she does not get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:45 AM
–

This society has no love for mothers. If society punishes women for becoming pregnant, they will avoid becoming pregnant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:33 AM
–

Modern society does not value a woman’s ability to give birth. Becoming pregnant results in penalization because a significant portion of men absolutely do not value mothers and society reflects this by unapologetically reducing a woman’s ability to thrive because of the very act of giving birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:31 AM
7

And in this society, as you have just explained explicitly to me, mothers have no value. Women are humans. If you penalize a human for giving birth, they will be deterred from giving birth. The things you have said here desecrate the very idea of motherhood. It seems to me that men with this view hate women. Why would we risk our health and autonomy to propagate with men who have no goodwill towards us
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:27 AM
6

It’s impossible to provide a safe environment for mothers in your opinion? The only alternative is the complete dehumanization and elimination of women’s role in society by outsourcing birth and forcing women to provide care to children at a man’s discretion?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:59 AM
–

So men would rather create artificial wombs than acknowledge the value of women as mothers and invest in creating an environment where women do not fear the consequences of birth. got it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:52 AM
–

Your argument is that women having the ability to delay birth is the cause of the birthrate decline. It sounds like you are assigning the cause of this to women's ability to choose when to have children and having the ability to be more choosy when it comes to partners . I feel like this may be too linear. I am not accusing you of saying this but because of this simplistic viewpoint, there are an alarming amount of men who suggest the subjugation of women as a solution to this problem. I would a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:32 AM
–

Besides, women have never been safer with more freedom in the whole history of mankind but we are supposed to believe they don't give birth because the environment is "unsafe" ? This kind of female sollipsism is crazy. I can't even- So what is the cause behind the birthrate epidemic?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:01 AM
–

The kind of views one women and mothers expressed in this sub are not exactly what I would call a safe environment for women or children. this one?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:26 AM
–

Women have stopped giving birth at rates never seen before. Globally. I have not seen one man who talks about this unprecedented phenomenon with the passion and concern with which they address the male loneliness epidemic. Birthrates decline in animals when environmental factors are unsafe or unfit for raising offspring. The kind of views one women and mothers expressed in this sub are not exactly what I would call a safe environment for women or children.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:14 AM
–

I very much doubt that future generations will have the luxury of spending their time complaining about dating and internet culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:24 AM
1

This may be controversial but it seems an awful lot lot humans were meant to be promiscuous regardless of their gender. I think sincere conversations around sexuality that doesn't frame sexual desire as an evil would be very helpful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:43 PM
1

Men still earn more on average and are more represented in high-paying STEM and executive roles even though women earn 60% of bachelor’s degrees, a majority of master’s degrees, and roughly half of professional and doctoral degrees. Data is data.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:04 PM
2

haha no, if you can't understand the scope and scale of economics as a subject enough to specify beyond 'economics' you cannot possibly have a PHD in anything. If I was trying to convince you that I was a professional gamer, you say "which game do you play?" I say, "its so obscure and special you wouldn't even know it!" you say, "Well, what type of genre is it?" I say "No, I cannot tell you because its so top secret" Your common sense would have to dictate that I am lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:41 AM
3

economics is a pretty broad subject. Its like me telling you that I work in the medical field but specifying which one would dox me. haha come on here man
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:31 AM
5

no lol that's not how that works. You don't have a PHD
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:24 AM
3

I actually have a PhD so I am a scientist lol. What was your dissertation on?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:15 AM
1

modern humans have existed for about 2.5 million years. Agriculture for about 10,000. I have some ideas but anything I have to say pales in comparison to the possibilities both past and present. I will say that I think its interesting to watch humanity blindly, but relentlessly search for the egalitarian society that is etched into our DNA It seems to me that the incongruity we come up on regarding hierarchies, wealth inequality, division of genders regarding value, etc. feels unnatural because …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:02 AM
3

A lot of men on here complain about oppression regarding women's preferences for men with healthy BMI's, access to wealth, and genetic predispositions regarding height. Personally, I don't feel oppressed. I have a sense of self-worth and therefore my partner does not need to be inferior to me in morality and economic competencies
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:27 AM
7

That's what we call a relationship. If you just want sex that's fine. But you have no say in what any women you are using for sex does with her body, career, children produced by the sex, or any other thing that is related to relationships. You want a fuck buddy with no authentic connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:12 AM
8

You have to get along with the person you are in a relationship with. This means shared interests. What you are describing is a fuck buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:42 AM
5

Scientists. There is a reason the scientific community enforces standards related to transparency, peer review, and rigid methodology. Are you saying you are anti-science while literally benefiting from technology and knowledge related to this field? If you don't believe in science you are free to go live as a medieval peasant but it seems to me you have benefited from education, modern medicine, innovative technology, and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:37 AM
4

Because they are just as productive as men. There is a plethora of data that proves this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:19 AM
0

Just like the rise in right wing ideology, the increase of misogynistic rhetoric seems to be a global phenomenon
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:18 AM
6

shared interests have been shown to be very significant when it comes to a successful relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:16 AM
1

The idea that men and women exist in separate realms is not my invention. This is an invention of the patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:14 AM
3

I mean, take workplace discussions for example. Feminists often emphasize equal pay for women—which is important, but rarely focus on industries dominated by women where men are underpaid or overlooked. Two big elephants in the room here. Women's work is often over-looked and un-PAID. Women succeeding in the workforce after being told for years that they were not qualified or competent enough to participate in that workforce bears attention. Or consider family law. Custody battles often favor mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:12 AM
1

In a patriarchal system* morality is women’s realm I might not have been as clear as I could have been, sorry. Men and women are humans. Humans have morality, empathy, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:37 AM
5

I just got done listening to 'Sex at Dawn' You might like it, it really flips the idea that our cultural identities are 'natural'
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:34 AM
3

how so?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:33 AM
2

Morality isn't women's realm. People do have morality. We aren't talking about humanity. We are talking about patriarchal systems. Chastity, morality, and honor are central to women's identities in patriarchal systems. Violence, machoism, and carnal desires are central to men's identities in patriarchal systems. No, this isn't natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:32 AM
5

I thought that's what conservative men wanted? If you don't want women to work or be represented in high paying fields, you get a society where women have to consider a man's ability to financially support her and their potential children no?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:29 AM
6

Low n-count, healthy BMI, family-oriented. Slightly used, good condition, and obedient. These guys are not describing a partner. They are describing an appliance. Notice there is zero concern regarding actual human traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:26 AM
1

Do men not view women as objects/possessions?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:22 AM
1

This society has patriarchal foundation. The culture you are talking about is a patriarchal culture. Morality and domestication is a women's realm and power and influence men's realm according to the patriarchy in this view, violence and immorality are acceptable when coming from men because these align with power.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:21 AM
–

Here's another comment from the comment section "As a non-native speaker, I’ve noticed English speakers sometimes talk about people (especially in dating context) in a strangely business-like way. “High value,” “dating market,” “investing your time in someone.” When I translate these into my language, they sound so cold and off-putting, as if people were being compared to shoes or cars instead of humans..."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 02:08 AM
2

its super weird that I upset you so much
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:47 AM
1

But you still slept with them right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:34 AM
2

So you will use her to satisfy your desires because of her looks. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:24 AM
2

What standards? It seems like you are willing to sleep with women who you don't respect. What standards could you possibly have?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:31 AM
2

I bet it doesn't feel good to steal from people either, which is why most people don't You legitimately don't seem to understand that you are talking about humans. These people aren't your playthings. Getting on reddit and talking about them like this is gross. Its a betrayal. They slept with you. You are on here talking about them as if they are an unfortunate encounter you had rather than an intimate partner. Airing their sexual preferences like nothing. Talking about them like animals in a pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:27 AM
2

It kind of sounds like you are just picking up whatever women you can. You're into goth girls but can't get your hands on them so you grab the next best thing. you're talking about women like they are cafeteria food.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:16 AM
1

Do you respect them as people?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:08 AM
2

Also while I don’t have a source for this iirc romantic loneliness has been a drastically rising cause of suicide in boys but I while I can’t prove that, I wouldn’t be surprised. Women, overwhelmingly, have stopped giving birth. No one has thought to check in with them.... This complaint seems largely related to the concept of implied ownership. Do you talk about coveting the success and possessions of men in the same way that you talk about women's access to sexual encounters?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 06:08 AM
1

I’m very respectful of women I’m seeing. How? Do you treat them with dignity? Talk about them with respect and understanding?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:56 AM
2

Are you saying Westernized Lebanese women have this specific characteristic or that they are more likely to be sexually repressed. Have you considered the lack of humanity when it comes to your commentary on people you have been intimate with. you clutch your pearls because of their kinks but seem to have a complete disconnect between your understanding of the women you have slept with in relation to your understanding of their humanity
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:46 AM
2

From ideologically motivated studies because they are afraid of admitting that a lot of women have a morbid obsession with male criminals. This seems like a reactionary and reductive opinion. Why in the world would most women have a morbid obsession with male criminals? Why do you watch horror movies then? If not to develop strategies, is it because you enjoy depictions of death and gore? No, they fantasize about being able to use brute strength to force other people to do things. Same kind of r…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:43 AM
1

There is evidence to suggest that attention to crime related media is tied to developing survival strategies or seeking deeper understanding regarding male on female violence. Romance novels usually don't involve the murder of the woman. "if I were a man, I'd behave this way" In this instance, are you saying that women place themselves in the position of the man when fantasizing about these kind of things? Do you place yourself in the position of the woman when you fantasize about sexual encount…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:25 AM
4

It sounds a hell of a lot like repressed sexuality to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:19 AM
6

im sorry lol What? Don't these fantasies involve the action happening TO women themselves? Are you suggesting that when women fantasize about this type of fantasy in the sense that they are the aggressor?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:14 AM
5

What human would want to be treated this way? I would think that there are some very serious issues related to self-worth regarding the person you are talking about. Do you think its helpful to use this example when talking about women in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:03 AM
13

You might be over thinking this. Consider bodice ripping rather than violent assault. Women raised in a culture that shames them for wanting sex and praises them for remaining pure might be prone to developing fantasies that fit this narrative when rationalizing their own carnal desires. I would be willing to bet that the vast majority of these fantasies don't involve physical harm or degradation
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter