TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NobleRed Archive

View 2 posts and 12 comments by NobleRed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

Red Pill TheoryNobleRed/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 04:39 PM
3

NobleRed/r/askTRP20/08/15 12:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

These are not my connotations. There are literally hundreds of articles explaining the difference between reacting and responding and how to respond rather than react. Take a look To me, responding is simply one method of reacting. Yes. A response is a type of reaction. It is a good/skillful/useful/considered reaction. As a result, the word react has come to take on the opposite connotation (bad/unskillful/unuseful/unconsidered), in counterpoint to the word response. A reaction can be good or ba…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 10:22 PM
1

The terms respond and react already have well-established connotations because there has, in fact, been a large wider dialogue about the difference between these terms. Your and BurgundyCarpet's ignorance of it, and my pointing it out and explaining it to you, does not make these connotations mine and therefore subjective. Take a look at the hundreds of articles on this exact topic by doing a simple Google search. My response was laughably incomplete? You're response is laughably ignorant. React…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 10:04 PM
5

Sure. From Merriam Webster: To react is "to change or act in response to a stimulus." To respond is "to have a good or desired reaction to something." Reactive people don't consider whether or not their reaction is appropriate, useful, desirable or good. Reactive people act purely based on their feels in that moment. Reactive people are great for reality TV. By being responsive, you take ownership of the reactive energy inside you and guide it such that it provides benefit.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 05:58 PM
3

Amused Mastery is an attitude that expresses that by virtue of your considerable life experience, "you've seen it all before", and that anything and everything anyone else does or might do is kind of predictable and therefore somewhat amusing. You enjoy the games girls play (flirting, teasing, shit tests) because you understand what's behind them and you think it's amusing. Basically you're willing to humor people and go along with what they say, but really you're not taking them seriously, in a…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 05:33 PM
2

Never react, always respond is correct, and there's an important difference. The difference is most apparent when the initial stimulus is negative somehow, like an insult for example. To respond means that your "reaction" has been considered, evaluated, and adjusted as appropriate to meet your goals in that situation. Even in fun times, you want to be responding rather than reacting, consciously aware of how your input affects the interaction. Your point about putting in the least effort is good…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 05:22 PM
2

My pleasure. I wish you the best.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 01:17 PM
2

Exactly what I was going for. Thanks for the feedback and good luck on your path.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 01:14 PM
2

Your post is a rambling mess. Just remember that your sense of well being and satisfaction with life comes from your own internal perspective. Everything in the material world can and will be ripped away from you between now and death. There's nothing you can accomplish in the material world which will not deteriorate. Your angry words suggest you still have some internal desire to grapple with spiritual pathways. I support that. Use that anger to find your own path, to cherry pick truth from th…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 01:05 PM
0

By your Google terms, you're from the Theravadan tradition, which has a much narrower view of renunciation. Don't claim to represent all Buddhism. For Western minds, self development is a useful term even if, as you say, self dissolution may be more technically accurate. Desire to get pussy has nothing to do with buddhism. It is not even remotely a goal of buddhism. Sigh. Most people on this forum experience strong craving desires for sex. It is not an unfair promise that walking the path will s…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 12:25 PM
3

Thanks for your earnest question. Craving desire, or attachment, is the root of all suffering. Desire to get laid may be the thing that starts you on the journey of self improvement in earnest (as I think is the case with most of the men here) but the prerequisites are what will keep you on the path. By slowly and surely integrating renunciation, you let go of the idea that sex with more women or more wealth is going to bring you greater happiness. At the same time, however, you're capacity to a…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 11:36 AM
1

This feedback is a bit painful to read but I want to clarify some things for those not familiar with Buddhism. it's very far from the actual teachings of Buddhism... Every part of it is flawed This is patently untrue and, worse, may discourage others from taking benefit from the post. The discussion of the prerequisites are based in years of my personal study and contemplation of teachings coming from high Tibetan Buddhist lamas and scholars. My understanding and interpretations will always be l…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 02:19 AM
2

If I feel sorry I'll say sorry, but frankly I think it was funny. If I said sorry I'll be lying Here, you're explaining yourself, have resorted to direct rational conversation and so you've lost. The best thing to do is to forget it ever happened and hope she does the same. My advice for getting back into flirty territory: demonstrate high value by being loud, social and funny with other people around her, ignoring eye contact with her completely until you bring her into the fun conversation som…
/r/askTRP22/05/15 02:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter