Who’s the incompetent? When my future wife heard how fussy I am about how I like my shirts she said “I’m not going to do your laundry.” I replied “Oh no you are not.”
To those that believe this image is shopped: I don't think so. I remember the flap when this and an number of other similarly themed photos came out a number of years ago. IIRC the son was not a minor at the time, so this thing falls under "I'm a celebrity so I can get away with cringy inappropriate behavior", not abuse. Except maybe abuse to the viewer's eyes.
As a gentleman my expectation, or rather hope, is that based on this and my other behaviors you see me as such. "Uncomfortable." The entire point of rules of etiquette is to avoid uncomfortable situations. I strive to make women, and people in general comfortable. That is unless you express in no uncertain terms that you would enjoy some discomfort.
"Helps avoid an awkward situation." This is the reason every rule of etiquette exists, duh.. If a woman today is too entitled/uneducated to understand that the gentleman is taking on the bother of paying she should be informed. If Etiquette 101 doesn't work for her it's time to find a true gentlelady for him to date instead. Etiquette was never meant to serve as a weapon in the War of the Genders. Edit: We've fallen on sad times if people are having to learn about etiquette on some insipid netwo…
Just when you think Salon can't become more of a joke... Thank you so much, dear Salon, for freeing me from the burden of determining for myself what defines me as a man. Salon: Go fuck yourself. Deeply and twice.
Wow. You really misunderstood the message in your excerpt from my comment you posted above. If I have to explain... You're take on the OP isn't really going down well. Have a good weekend.
I explained that my dislike for the current First Lady was due to her conduct in a repy to one of your other comments. Go ahead, paint me as a racist. It won't be the first time you've attempted to inject race, as well as party politics, into the threads in this discussion.
"Check yourself." What does that even mean? Did you just assume my race?™ Social justice? Seriously? Perhaps MR doesn't need you. Your obsessi... I mean talent might be better served by other "causes."
I'm afraid that it is you that has introduced politics into this conversation, again. Also, please don't use language such as "check yourself." You make yourself sound as bad as those we're resisting.
Then you're really going to hate the following: My distaste for our first... woman has nothing to do with the fact that she's married to a Democrat. My feelings are not politically biased. They are based on her behavior, her attitude. Generic parenting advice? Why do you think this is acceptable? Everyone is ordering everyone else as to how to make decisions, how to live their life. This is arrogant to the core. Guidelines as to conduct are already covered, by means of The Law. The Michelle issu…
"Men should simply be better..." Yet another person assuming men in general are in need of some sort of remedy. Ugh. Nothing new to see here. The men that design her expensive gowns? That protect her 24/7? I'm sure they're perfectly ok. This woman hates. She hates America, she hates The Executive Mansion, she hates parents that decide for themselves what to feed their children...
It is better than nothing. I'm getting downvoted to hell for my comment. My point was that we aren't adopting the feminist attitude of "equal isn't enough."
Levels of "sexuality" between genders is immaterial, if even true. Like any other crime the punishment should not depend on a perceived level of motivation to commit said crime.
Pardon my ignorance here, but is trial by jury a constitutionally protected right in the UK? Whether it is or not, this Yank finds the notion in the OP terrifying.
Aww. They've made it look scientific! Look everyone! VENN DIAGRAMS. We are soooo legit. We are feminists! We are good at placing individuals into groups! It's okay to have preconceived notions about people if you use high sounding pseudo terminology!!! We are smarter than you. We have hate thinly veiled as knowledge on our side. "Know thine enemies ladies." I can just hear her say. Uggg. Is the return of phrenology next?
Saw this. Absolutely spot on. It's so glaringly obvious that Pelosi is counting on the masses to have an irrational, emotion based reaction to her statement, never making a thoughtful analysis of it. I can't believe people are this stupid sometimes.
My recovering feminist wife sometimes gives me grief just for being subscribed to this subReddit and am thus guilty by association. Should I explain to her that technically it's a red gelcap?
"Why could we not expel a student based on an allegation?" Because that would empower ANYONE to have one expelled simply by opening one's mouth? Idiots... IDIOTS!! Is anyone out there still using their head??
I NEVER backpedal. You're just simply not going to consider the possibility that your sense of humor is poor are you? Well, the world needs it's Piers Morgans doesn't it?
It's ABSOLUTELY laughable that a study would be required to figure this out. If there's ONE single absolute about feminism it's this. If, somehow, women were no longer able to eschew sexism when it benefited them feminism would disappear overnight.
This is not title embellishment by Reddit standards. If it was it would read "Republican mom…" When Liberals fuck up their political affiliation is never mentioned on Reddit.
The ever popular yet actually non-starter use of the word "privilege" in this context makes me want to punch someone. The word is nothing but a device for attempting to transfer self loathing from the utterer to the listener.
So it's fiction. But it does suggest that girls are growing up without a proper understanding of what rape is. Rape happens in the fleeting moment between when a person says NO (and means it) and the other refuses to stop. Sex provided for a later broken "contract" isn't rape.
Gay men aren't happier, it's a front. I couldn't possibly be the only person that's noticed that gay men are constantly one upping others, especially straights. Their sex life is so fabulous, their social life is wonderful, my fantastic clothes, my lovely home... blah blah blah. Really gentlemen? There's nothing you're obliged to prove.
So if I am ever indicted for rape I can have the court order that the alleged victim's heart be removed and called to the stand so I may face my accuser as is my constitutional right.
"Assuming for the sake of argument that a workable definition of "hate speech" exists at all, and that it can be harmonized with the values embodied in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution..." Thank Gawd, at least one person other than me get's it.
They're getting ahead of themselves: First, they must prove that "rape culture" is real and not a word based tactic to garner more attention (which it is). "If we use the word culture people will believe it's all a greater problem!" I, for one am not fooled.
"Privilege" is bullshit. In most cases those that use the word have no proof that one didn't come to have what they have due to their own efforts. For all we know one of the "privileged" started with nothing.
I ask because I wonder if her abuse of you was motivated by a hatred of her sexual self which is sometimes manifest as self mutilation. Is it possible she was also the victim of sexual abuse?
Rates should be based on the damage your chosen vehicle is known to cause. Wanna drive a body on frame tank that will likely override my hood and penetrate my windshield? Pay your share in premiums.
Premiums should be based on the amount of damage your chosen vehicle is known to do. Want to drive a body on frame tank that has a bumper that will penetrate my windshield? Pay your share in insurance.
Self perpetuating problem: Minging over "feminist" issues simply doesn't attract pick up artists. This then inflames feminist jealousy toward women secure in their identity that are free to enjoy the attention of others.
WE ALL KNOW you are wearing those shoes to bolster your rank among women, not men. Pathetic, no points for effort. Do you wish to retract your statement that we are dumb?
Well, Since I cannot spend all day: Law#44 states: If the breakup wasn't filled with drama the relationship wasn't intensity laden enough to be worth having.
Your wit. So razor sharp. Dozens of stitches in the sides of my fingers and my right thumb at hospital makes it so difficult to remove my iPhone from it's case to dry up the blood.
