TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Nogbadd Archive

View 9 posts and 153 comments by Nogbadd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Shame, silence and sack (the three Ss) are what feminists call for. With support for feminism down to 7% in the UK it is reasonable to attribute at least part of that decline to Jess. It is in our interests that she stays until the next election, when the other parties may raise her misandry as an election issue. If she loses, as I hope she will, what a clear message to all gender bigots in the Labour Party!
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:27 AM
9

There was no suggestion that the teenage girl was directly involved in the Anzac Day attack plot. The girl is in the UK and charged in the UK through the UK justice system. You are right about the Australian injustice system, but this is not an example of Australian misandry.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:03 AM
13

Wonderful. The mainstream media seem to be competing to demonise men's issues and these posters strike just the right tone....
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:23 AM
10

The story: The Courier-Mail reports police opposed her bail applications over fears the woman would interfere with witnesses. The report said the prosecutor, Sergeant Aaron Murray, said the woman had lied about, and instructed other people to lie about, the circumstances surrounding the baby’s death. The interpretation: She has been charged with attempted murder, two other infants with whom he was associated also died, she is a known liar, and she has attempted to interfere with witnesses. The M…
/r/MensRights05/01/15 07:08 AM
1

Thanks for your feedback. I'll stick to commenting, and I respect your judgement ;-)
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:37 AM
4

The author is ethnocentric and believes that the World revolves around her. I despair that she is paid from the public purse to spin this sort of nonsense to impressionable kids.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:54 AM
1

This picture was taken of a ‘pissoir’ in Surfers Paradise in Queensland, Australia. It appears to show a woman trying to take a snap of a man urinating in the pissoir. The pissoirs were placed in the street by the local Council to encourage men to urinate in them. He is doing nothing wrong. However, it could be that the man in the picture is 'man spreading', or maybe he is invading her ‘safe space’ with his 'toxic masculinity’. Perhaps she is taking a creep shot to show just how much of a creep …
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:46 AM
1

I didn't see any evidence that women are faster learners. Just another woozle. If women are in the majority of voters, why did Julia Gillard (female leader of the Labor Party) not get elected with an absolute majority?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:42 PM
1

I just copied and pasted. I note your point, which is well made ;-)
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:16 PM
20

It's stories like that that reminds us that we are not bonkers. Calibrating what is right is hard when so many people lie to support what is wrong
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:27 AM
13

I would have thought that compulsory gender studies might actually have the opposite effect than proponents expect. Men would soon realise that it is a phony subject, and that "passing" involves parotting a few key phrases in random order, and not shaving under your arms. What would be interesting is the attempts to silence male voices in classroom "debates". Imagine if the non - feminist students (presumably four out of five) challenged the lunacy, and recorded the inherent sexism of the Facult…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:51 AM
2

This is a moral dilemma. If the roles had been reversed, and the boy was cheating on the girl... Well, that would be interesting!
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:36 AM
1

Great post. Thank you, and well done.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 12:52 AM
1

I have wondered if he is being blackmailed. Otherwise, it is hard to understand why he is so brazen about his hatred of men support for women who hate men.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:25 AM
1

Thanks for your feedback. It is possible I am over excited. Do you think it at all strange that a senior police officer would seek out a selfie with a misandrist? Maybe my normal-o-meter is out of calibration. Apologies.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:01 AM
5

Here is a link to the news item. Ken Lay is the Chief Commissioner of Police in Victoria, Australia. He has just announced his resignation, which will be a relief to the men of Victoria. A noted white knight, he was happiest naming men charged with offences, even though they were innocent in the eyes of the law. This image is a screen capture of a Facebook post by a toxic misandrist whose views would frighten horses. She is rejoicing that the State's most senior police officer appears to be beso…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:53 AM
1

It took me a while to write the text.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:07 AM
1

Ken Lay is the Chief Commissioner of Police in Victoria, Australia. He has just announced his resignation, which will be a relief to the men of Victoria. A noted white knight, he was happiest naming men charged with offences, even though they were innocent in the eyes of the law. This image is a screen capture of a Facebook post by a toxic misandrist whose views would frighten horses. She is rejoicing that the State's most senior police officer appears to be besotted with her. Others may feel th…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:05 AM
7

I have a friend who insists upon arguing that feminism "helps men too". I just laugh at her now, and ask her does she also believe that the moon landings were faked?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:01 AM
13

That's your right! But the omission looks deliberate, as if it is inappropriate to even mention something connected with men. The world as we know it was created by men: why not celebrate all men? It's only pixels on a screen, but it says that we matter
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:58 AM
1

I think you are supposed to put 'fact' in upper case, so that it carries some weight. Yes, you are the problem, it's not ad hominem, it's just a fact. FACT There, I fixed it for you. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:00 AM
2

Fourth, this video is calling out you rempathy bias, so if you have a problem with you, I suspect the problem is you. "Calling out", or bullying as it used to be called? Bread and circuses, my friend, bread and circuses. I certainly do not have any 'rempathy' bias, but I do draw the line at ad hominem attacks. If you think videos about homeless men are entertainment, then that's your choice. It isn't mine.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:44 AM
9

The Romans had slaves fight each other as gladiators for their amusement. Now, we have such contempt for homeless men that we taunt them for 15 minutes of fun, and then move on to complain about patriarchy. This video is symptomatic of the empathy bypass that has gripped contemporary society
/r/MensRights26/12/14 11:09 PM
3

I think the puppet in the video probably had a hand in the design of the campaign. See what I did there?
/r/MensRights26/12/14 09:48 AM
3

Is he... really ... suggesting that if men were more like women there would be fewer male suicides? I'm disappointed. I like that show. I can never look at it in the same way again.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:37 AM
2

This is fascinating. As this "statistic" has also been quoted as a reason for the imminent Royal Commission in to Domestic Violence in Victoria in Australia, it will be interesting to see if we can get it retracted before it is assumed into the Terms of Reference. I'm on the case....
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:29 AM
5

I can't see what a Royal Commission in one State can expose that multiple other Federal and State-based agencies in other jurisdictions have not already exposed. The money would be better spent on supporting women and men who are victims of family violence, and also supporting mental health initiatives for women and men, as well as education initiatives. This is grandstanding
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:35 AM
2

Disabled men are also more likely to be found in the lowest income bracket than women Wow!
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:06 AM
10

Here is the video. You can see that she is a bullying, lying thug
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:15 AM
2

Best to ask a woman in case you are accidentally mansplaining. Or click here
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:25 AM
4

I really don't get why journalists avoid mentioning the words "men" or "boys" when they are "victims" as in Pakistan or the "students" in Mexico. Is it a written policy, or an informal understanding? I'm reluctant to see conspiracies where they do not exist, so I don't want to weave this incident into some elaborate pattern of airbrushing male disadvantage. Ooops, Looks like I just did.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 11:53 PM
3

Scholarships for women are fine, but scholarships for men would be illegal. You really couldn't make this stuff up.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:32 PM
9

Because saying “I’m a feminist” is the beginning of a conversation, not the end of one. I reflected upon this, and smiled. Clearly this is born of experience, and I cherish the number of times she has proudly announced her feminism, only to see the other person's face change, catch them glancing at their watch, and being crushed inside as the other party mumbles some barely credible excuse about having left the gas on, or needing to mow the lawn urgently, in order to escape a twenty minute lectu…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 10:27 PM
3

I want to tear down your need to feel “macho.” I laughed out loud. The sun will not rise on a day when I will look to any one else, male or female, to inform my judgment on what makes me a man.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 09:41 PM
6

If this happened in another country, they would be denounced as show trials. Was it Nelson Mandela who said "at the end of the day what hurts us is not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends" ?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 09:04 PM
9

An obvious reason why men need male only spaces is to help build the support networks to deal with the unacceptable suicide rate amongst men. I think Mike Buchanan will learn as his campaign progresses to avoid being derailed onto marginal issues like female to male transgender people. I wish him well...
/r/MensRights22/12/14 08:51 AM
14

I've researched downloads of Justin Bieber songs with the incidence of marriage, and the correlation is r=0.99876. Therefore exposure to spoiled brats negatively correlates with the marginal propensity to get married. QED
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:12 AM
2

So what is the point of all of this rambling you may ask? MensRights is either a joke being perpetrated by radfems, and nobody wants to clue me in, or it's a hen house full of dickless roosters pointing out all of the ways they are being sleighted, misunderstood, mischaracterized, and marginalized, but not doing a damned thing about it but commiserating! Did the author mean "slighting" rather than "sleighting"? ;-) I am being ironic, of course. I give money to homeless men, I support men and boy…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:14 AM
2

So what is the point of all of this rambling you may ask? MensRights is either a joke being perpetrated by radfems, and nobody wants to clue me in, or it's a hen house full of dickless rooters pointing out all of the ways they are being sleighted, misunderstood, mischaracterized, and marginalized, but not doing a damned thing about it but commiserating! Did you mean "dickless roosters"? ;-)
/r/MensRights21/12/14 11:52 PM
2

No and yes. It's TV news aimed at vacuous balloon heads. Your point being?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:56 AM
8

Feminism's for women and men
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:53 AM
10

Even one rape is unacceptable, but in Australia the official incidence of rape is 28 per 100,000 people. A rate of three out of ten would be 30,000 per 100,000 people. So that implies that society in Canada must hardly function with men raping women everywhere at a rate that is a thousand times worse than Australia. How do you have time for all that hockey? For what its worth, the same research suggested that the rate for Canada was 1.7 per 100,000 in 2010. Things sure have got worse in Canada i…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 06:16 AM
2

Absolute 0% of the worldwide media have tried to use this tragic event to victimise men because not everything is a mens rights issue. Apart from Sunrise on Channel Seven?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 05:46 AM
170

I think female teachers should be taught "remember not to rape the boys". That ought'a do it/s
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:12 AM
45

The text of my complaint lodged here: In the segment "Community deals with Cairns stabbing" on Sunrise the presenters interviewed Heather Nancarrow, the CEO of The National Research Organisation for Women's Safety. Given the story was about a woman killing her children, it was an error of judgement to create a platform for a feminist to seek to make a political point about male violence against women. While I note that the presenters emphasised that they were making "general" comments, but to su…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:38 PM
10

This should be posted on feminist sites. It's impossible not to feel sympathy for the man, his family, and contempt for the girl. Rape culture indeed!
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:59 PM
9

FIVE fathers have lost a child. So you are all wrong that a man will be blamed. Five men will be blamed.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:57 AM
3

It is the definition of humanism. And egalitarianism. Look up confirmation bias. These people specifically did not self identify as feminist. Unless you know better than 80% of the World? Mind you feminists are full of advice for women and men. Massive they are superior beings, dispensing their wisdom to us mere mortals?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:28 AM
10

No hesitation to blame men, and the children are not even buried yet. What a hypocritical arse. "Don't stereotype indigenous people. Do stereotype men"
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:49 AM
2

I don't condone violence, but as my perception of US policing is based on COPS, I suspect that this police officer avoided touching her for fear of a false allegation. If she had been male, the police officer would have cuffed him and detained him within 60 seconds. As it is, she is a hazard to herself and road users, and should have been detained much sooner for her own safety. I don't want to punch anyone, I want the police to apply the law equally. Its not that hard.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:07 AM
2

80% of people don't subscribe to feminism, not because they don't understand feminism, but because they understand feminism all too well. Check it out, smart man, here Most people don't subscribe, for a range of diverse reasons. You don't know what they are, do you?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:30 AM
3

I agree it is a powerful act, and at least it has attracted some publicity, albeit in a local news outlet. They might attach some speech bubbles to the kids with the text: "Where's Daddy?"
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:04 AM
6

We can tell from the tone of voice of the news reporters. Its the "concerned and compassionate" voice, not the "indignant and outraged" voice. "Poor dear. Poor love. What a tragedy." A bit like the woman who shoved her new born child down a drain and left him to die. "Poor dear. Poor love. What a tragedy."
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:03 AM
2

If feminism is so useful, why do so many women not subscribe to it? Stop dodging the truth...
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:00 AM
7

I think she does deserve support and psychiatric help. The problem is not that she should be incarcerated, but that if a man had done the same he would have: no sympathy no empathy no offer of psychiatric support no hope no chance Instead, there would be calls from the pitchfork brigade feminist community to limit access of men to their children. Sigh...
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:53 AM
4

statue stunt ...or legitimate protest?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:44 AM
5

My favourite comment is from Rebecca Lavigne "Google the top 20 most influential people in history and you can be sure 98% of the them will be guys" Gold.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:27 PM
3

Too early. You are right. The blame will end up on a man. But not just yet
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:10 AM
3

Relevance is relative, not absolute. You do not decide what is relevant. You are not mainstream. I decide what is conventional. I decide what is relevant. I decide what is appropriate. I have ovaries. Come back from that one. /s
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:07 AM
2

But your post parrots other's received wisdom. Don't be ashamed. You're not the first. But if I tried to tell you what it is like to be a Asian American gay man, you would have every right to point out that I have no experience of being Asian or being gay. Why do you think you can repeat what a tiny minority of women say, yet claim it is not vicariously experienced received wisdom? If feminism is so great, why do so few women self identify as feminists? Because feminism is a crock of shit. That'…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:50 AM
2

I don't just repeat other things people tell me. At the risk of being pedantic, when you as a man talk about alleged female disadvantage, aren't you by definition repeating things others have told you?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:34 AM
3

Personally, I'm talking about succeeding in a increasingly less but still very heteronormative, white, and male society as well as feeling confident and sexy and desired in gay spaces both online and in the real world I'm afraid that using words like 'heteronormative', and trying to shame white men are unlikely to build bridges with people like me. Mind you, talking absolute nonsense doesn't help either. Pro tip for redvelvetx; if you want to feel "confident, sexy and desired", look in the mirro…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:14 AM
3

the true meaning of Mens Rights I can't agree with most of what you have written, but I have to take issue with this. Your use of the phrase "mens rights" rather than the grammatically correct "men's rights" has triggered memories of when my ex-wife battered me. I hate wrongs done to either gender. I can't agree with most of what you have written, but I have to take issue with this. Your use of the phrase "either gender" implies that there are only two genders, and yet many people reject this si…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 11:49 PM
3

Yes, all men eat babies, and torture kittens, too. Now run along...please.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:15 AM
2

It was a throwaway comment, not a medical diagnosis. Good grief, brother, why are you dissecting this and applying analysis to what was intended to be a fun comment? Testosterone is such a cool hormone ;-) See the emoticon? This is not a doctoral thesis. As to your statement, I will apply the same forensic zeal to your comment, and you can see how these apples taste: "You're claiming him getting angry can be chalked up to testosterone" Really? I said that? Where? You imply that into my statement…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:59 PM
16

She is part of a jihad against men. Irony intended. It's not Islam. It's testes, stupid.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:40 AM
2

You are right. Saying that testosterone had contributed to AA's behaviour automatically implies that all women who get angry must have elevated levels of testosterone. I wish I had paid more attention in logic class. I would know what a syllogism is, and why it is a logical fallacy. Doh!
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:00 AM
1

Testosterone levels are linked to anger, and men have more testosterone than women. Or am I wrong? I like Testosterone, I see it as a positive hormone ;-)
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:28 AM
2

So you must be a Scorpio? (Non sequitur response to your non sequitur response)
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:29 PM
2

My first cat was called "Minty" . What was your first pet called?
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:25 AM
8

Is this an invitation to envision having sex with your own children? Totes awks.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:36 AM
67

"Sue the kid". I laughed. If it wasn't for dual standards, feminists would have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:35 AM
20

Should I get a therapist? The issue of criminality is one thing, but how your experiences affect your ability to develop rewarding relationships with others now and in the future is just as important, (if not more important). Reddit is not the best forum to seek counselling advice; talk to a doctor or qualified medical practitioner and they will respect your privacy. In particular, they will help you surface any repressed or suppressed feelings. I wish you well...
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:32 AM
16

"Following an intensive investigation, we have concluded that our behaviour has been hypocritical in the extreme. While purporting to be fighting the disadvantage of Western women who are, by any standards, extremely privileged, we have not only ignored the plight of women elsewhere in the World, we have actually contributed to their exploitation. We recognise that this is antithetical to the message that we sought to convey, and perpetuates the widely held belief that Western feminism has resor…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:22 AM
3

I think there is a (proposed) sub-reddit called Men's Rants, (presumably) specifically designed to separate the highlighting of dual standards from more serious commentary about Men's Rights There is also a sub-reddit devoted to Mens Rights activism. I think that this sub-Reddit is diverse and with >100k subscribers, there is a diverse range of topics. I enjoy coming here, and I'm sorry if the group does not meet your needs or expectations. Why not contribute some content that you would like to …
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:29 AM
1

I'm shocked/s
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:43 AM
5

The transition from calm to outraged (at 23:30) occurs in 0.48 seconds. Amazing. Testosterone is such a cool hormone ;-)
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:18 AM
2

I think it was Richard Nixon who first invoked the 'silent majority'; a spurious attempt to claim legitimacy based upon the absence of conspicuous consensus about a particular opinion or world view. And so the 'conventional wisdom' becomes mainstream when it is multilateral, when it is distributed, when multiple perspectives independently reach the same conclusion. So it is not sad that this reached the front page because another sub-reddit thought it remarkable. It would be sad if this only ach…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:03 PM
1

I agree!
/r/MensRights13/12/14 10:58 PM
1

A "feminist" space for men? That is like creating a Christian chapter in a society for atheists. The clue is in the name isn't it? Feminism. This is your first ever post? Hmmm.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 05:11 AM
11

I think this should be the 'poster child' case for the argument that justice is not blind to gender; the only reason the statue of a woman wearing a blindfold is displayed at law courts is because she is re-enacting a scene from Fifty Shades of Grey. I wish I had women's rights...
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:47 AM
8

Homeless men in Australia have a shorter life expectancy than men in Swaziland.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:42 AM
37

I enjoyed the video of Buzz Aldrin. But I wonder if it has crossed Rebecca's mind that suggesting there is secret global conspiracy by men to oppress women is just as bonkers batshit crazy as the conspiracy theory that the moon landings were faked? Or has she had an irony bypass?
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:39 AM
3

But the mother said: “I just want to say ... he hit me first ... and I proceeded to punch him. So he did it first on my side of the head and I have the photos to prove it.’’ Yes. Indeed. How right she is. Believe the woman. Always.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:32 AM
1

Here is the AVfM link to the events in Sydney. Alternatively, Google "Sydney University BROSoc" and you can take your pick...
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:21 AM
6

I know that women supports men's rights as well as men, but isn't this post addressing women likely to (falsely) accuse men of a non-existent crime? How many of those women are likely to subscribe to Men's Rights sub-Reddit? Quite apart from the fact that the chance of being exposed is a secondary reason not to make a false accusation. I can think of another, more primary reason. Its a lie.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:36 AM
0

Couldn't be in search of more publicity, could it?
/r/MensRights13/12/14 02:24 AM
4

'I think it's the hardest thing to give up, but my mother always taught me to be strong and to never be a victim, never make excuses, never expect anyone else to provide me things that I know I can provide for myself,' the singer said with emotion. I laughed out loud. Is this the same mother who taught your sister to assault people because she can? Is this the same woman who gets her kit off at the drop of a hat, and then demonises men for objectifying women? Is this the same woman who claimed t…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 12:24 AM
2

I loved the last line best of all. But it's all good.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:53 AM
1

Pluralism is the belief that "many" competing ideas should coexist, rather than one ideology being advanced as the only "right" or "true" belief system. Feminism is like a cuckoo, Richard; it seeks to displace competing ideologies and does not tolerate diversity of opinion. Followers become dogmatic "you are either a feminist or you are a misogynist!" to police ideas to ensure that "the one true faith" is recognised as the only legitimate belief system. I support pluralism; feminists do not. I s…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 07:03 AM
1

Richard it is an attempt to silence opinions that do not conform to the worldview of a tiny minority of people who think that they represent the 'conventional wisdom' or legitimate 'mainstream'. Silencing opposition like this is a one off issue. But then WAM! are silencing voices on the basis of ideological differences, not harassment. Try dissenting from feminist opinions on public forums. Your comments will be censored, and/ or deleted. This is a common experience, not a 'one off'. Laws are be…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:07 AM
3

The first comment has a response from 'sarajane'. sarajane is a habitual commenter / radical feminist replete with the full suite of toxic hatred for men. What is interesting that sarajane and her sockpuppet accounts feminist buddies habitually accuse men posting on feminist articles that they are 'derailing' or intruding on their safe space. Funny how it doesn't work the other way. What a twat she is. What hypocrites they all are. Bunch of arse.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:00 AM
13

This behaviour highlights that feminists clarify as "abuse" legitimate criticism of their ideas. You do not have the right NOT to be offended, girly-goos, you do not have the right to shut down opinions because you do not share them. Daily Life is a cesspit of vitriol, misandry and toxic hatred, but no-one is suggesting that it should be shut down. Feminism is lurching toward a totalitarian disregard for freedom that should make anyone who cherishes 'freedom' abandon the label 'feminist', or emb…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 10:36 AM
4

At the very least, people will be more sceptical about the "only 2% of all rape accusations are false" lie.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:57 AM
3

The obvious point in support of OP is that IF men articulate arguments in support of men's rights, the feminist male-shaming response is to start screaming "Misogynist!" and then repeat. And repeat again. The reason why Women Against Feminism is so powerful is that this particular shaming tactic is less effective against women. So the sisters resorted to comparing these women's intellect to that of cats, and suggesting that they "didn't understand" feminism. Cue reference to dictionaries. The ne…
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:44 PM
4

In other news, sales of rope in New South Wales have plummeted, after reaching a peak last year after the release of "Fifty Shades of Grey" popularised bondage amongst couples anxious to spice up their love lives. NSW Police pointed out that while most rope purchasers were women, this was because of the power imbalance in contemporary society. "Controlling men in controlling relationships control their partners through coercive means to participate in their vile distorted sexual practices" said …
/r/MensRights08/12/14 07:11 AM
2

I Sensational. I wonder how old these girls are? It sounds as if some of the posts are written by people whose understanding of the "real World" is gained through indirect means, rather than direct experience. Maybe through reading Tumblr blogs in their bedrooms instead of doing their homework? An appalling generalisation, I know, but the more I read, the more it seemed to be true,
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:33 PM
3

Here is my complaint at the BBC complaints page. You can copy and paste if you like it. https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/?reset= START In the excerpt of the interview with the author Anna Krien featured on your website, she makes the assertion that "boys are never taught not to rape". The assertion is featured as the headline of the brief article associated with the clip. Boys are not taught not to rape, just as they are not taught not to murder people. This is because most people do not m…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:54 PM
3

Not sure how this made it through the ABC filter. I must post my articles there using a female pseudonym ;-)
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:02 AM
2

I went to a Christian Brother's school. Today I am an atheist. So I hope that when these boys emerge as adults, they will challenge the "truisms' they were forced to accept as children.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:01 AM
1

I struggle to understand how a mature democracy can get itself in such a mess. I can only presume that anyone who pointed out the impracticality of the retrospective withdrawal of consent feared being demonised as a misogynist. Imagine I was getting married, then part way through the ceremony I said 'Do you know what? I think I'm more of a single guy than a husband' . Would the assembled guests defend my right? "no means no!" Exactly. This is a charter for more power for women.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:01 AM
1

M....A....N I spell MAN!
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:33 AM
1

I love the blues track called "I'm a man"...but I am also not ashamed of my gender. I am a man. A proud man!
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:01 AM
3

I have sometimes thought of having a T Shirt printed with the slogan "I am a man!" Except I suspect it is appropriating a civil rights slogan. A bit dramatic and cloaking in victimhood?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:50 AM
2

Man serves his punishment, but is punished again, as he happens to have a high profile trade. Pitchforks and torches, pitchforks and torches
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:55 AM
30

Q Why did the "boy scouts" become "the scouts", but the "girl guides" is still the girl guides? A Because safe spaces, blah blah, secret conspiracy, blah blah, toxic masculinity blah blah, misogyny blah blah, better to convert to lesbianism feminism blah blah
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:45 AM
1

I was being ironic. I was suggesting that the result is pre-ordained and the Royal Commission is a pretext to introduce new measures. Obviously I do not believe that segregation and capital punishment will feature amongst the 'necessary measures'. But what will be advocated? The Royal Commission is a means to an end, and it is legitimate question to ask : "What is the goal?" To reduce domestic violence will be the parroted answer, but we don' need a real commission to know how to do that...
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:38 PM
5

My favourite comment from the thread: This is actually the stupidest thing I've ever seen on the Internet.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:31 AM
14

Ford helped Australia's first woman Prime Minister play the gender card, resulting in a four point drop in support overnight. She is the best thing that ever happened to men's rights in Australia, as she is the epitome of the batshit crazy feminist who inspires women to post selfies on women against feminism. Carry on agent Ford, carry on.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 08:46 AM
2

The next show trial is a Royal Commission into Domestic Violence. The incoming (Labor) Government will use the "evidence" to segregate men from women and institute public executions of men accused of sexual assault. And you think I'm exaggerating?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 08:41 AM
6

Ovaries good:testes bad
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:55 AM
0

Clickbait
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:53 PM
1

I am not sure that I am reading this story. But Huzzah!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:49 PM
12

I am always cautious of inventing imaginary conspiracies, as I deride feminists for their belief in a secret global conspiracy to oppress women. But it might appear that the demise of a balanced teaching community has coincided with a fall in boys' grades. Correlation does not mean causation, but in this case it is hard to believe that boys are becoming more stupid by themselves...
/r/MensRights29/11/14 10:05 AM
2

He shows emotion, Steve, he shows emotion. He shows compassion. He shows behaviours which men are sometimes accused of being unable to show. You know that is not true, and I know that is untrue. His behaviour will set a great example for young men in Australia that they need not be ashamed of their gender.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:43 AM
1

This is Michael Clarke, Captain of the Australian Cricket Team reading a statement after the death of his team mate, Phil Hughes in a tragic accident. I see a man demonstrating compassion, determination, empathy and courage, and I believe that while Clarke deserves credit for his performance, these characteristics are innate to all men, not just a few.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:53 AM
3

Woman who stuffed her baby boy down a drain? Oh, poor love. She must be depressed. Man who assaults random strangers? Lock him up! Thow away the key! If it wasn't for dual standards, feminists wouldn't have any standards at all...
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:43 AM
1

I sense disappointment at engaging with someone who misrepresented themselves and then being ridiculed by the person to whom you showed compassion. Anger? A little strong. This seems like gas lighting. I was annoyed, I am disappointed, I am frustrated, but if you read what I have written (I speak only for myself) I do not feel anger. I would meet him again to listen to him, not to berate him. "In this case I fight for Kane because he is still a human with feelings of his own; independent of his …
/r/MensRights27/11/14 07:04 PM
2

I know you are not Kane. But when you live your life seeking approval from someone else, when you outsource your sense of your own self-worth to someone else, hoping that they tell you "you are a good man", do you know what you crave? Feedback. Approval. Your tummy rubbed. So Kane will hate-read stuff that gives him content to show his handlers just how good he really is. He is hipster with a beard and sandals. A young man who finds comfort "fitting in" and being accepted. Which we all do from t…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:55 PM
3

Sure We assembled on by one. We went round the table, telling our stories. The experiences were varied, ranging from separation from children to spousal abuse. When it came to Kane he gave a bullshit answer. We moved on, not really wanting to challenge a man about the legitimacy of his experiences. We chatted between our selves. We shared email addresses. We left. He wrote hatchet job article to get approval from the women he respects. A shame. Poor Kane. I feel sorry for him. Narcissism is a sc…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 09:41 AM
17

I was at the meeting. The guy in question lied about his background, lied about his experiences, lied about who he was, lied about his motivation to be there. I'd meet him again, but I would tell him that integrity and authenticity are personal characteristics that are fundamental to human interaction. Say who you are without fear. But he would not want this, as he is safer where he is, with his flock. I feel sorry for the people who's life is lived as a lie.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:57 PM
2

I agree with you. This is an article treating men as if they are some Amazonian tribe who have never before encountered civilisation. Some men are shy? Amazing! Some men lack confidence? Who'd have thought? Men want to talk to women but don't know what to say? Unbelievable! How come Richard Attenborough hasn't done a doco on these men? I think the article was planned to be contemptuous but then morphed into restrained pity. The author couldn't quite make that final leap to ask why some men are s…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:21 AM
2

"It's a princess theme. I'm going to have to pretend we're away that weekend" I was with this guy right up to the point when he associated gender issues with feminism. I suspect if he had been exposed to a male perspective on gender he would have laughed at a "princess party". "Isn't stereotyping girls as princesses storing up problems if you also claim that boys and girls are equal?" might have been an appropriate response. Self identifying as feminist just as many women are deserting feminism,…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:04 AM
3

Given the fact that some of the men who have committed atrocities (such as shooting large numbers of people) have clearly been mentally ill, I hope that we have learned to balance our initial reaction ("how could they do this?") with a recognition that abnormal behaviour is abnormal for a reason. So I hope the poor little boy is strong enough to survive, and I hope that the Mother is subject to a fair hearing. For all of us, the primary concern should be the fate of the boy, rather than the fate…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:17 PM
16

I saw instantly what the image shows. The woman plans to stab the man, but through her own fingers, so that she has knife wounds on her hands. Then, when the police finds his dead body, she can claim "it was self defence!" and show the wounds on her hands as she tried to defend herself. He has chosen a blade that will require deadly force to penetrate her back because of the wide blade, while she has chosen a stiletto to easily sever his spinal cord and paralyse him instantly before he can serio…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:59 PM
9

Proudly signed
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:02 AM
3

It's an old video. The message is that each of us needs to talk to other men air why being a "white knight" is not big and not clever. "How can she slap? " because some men think it's their job to protect women. I think it's my job to protect people. Including men from women like her
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:00 AM
2

As someone who lives in Australia, can I point out that the deeply unpopular prime minister caked Tony Abbott is routinely ridiculed for wearing "Speedos": swimming trunks which reveal his genitalia. In fact, he has the same genitalia as every man who has ever lived. But the media all laugh. Ha ha ha.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:54 AM
7

Imagine that some people decided to start a social experiment to w demonise every second person (but not themselves) with no clear idea of how it might turn out. Imagine that the. experiment ran for forty years, until eventually the media was choked with negative messages about every second person. Sounds like fun, doesn't it? What could possibly go wrong?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:02 AM
1

Proudly signed
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:52 AM
41

Apparently, Time's IT team devised a special IP lookup sub-routine that was able to identify that 76.76% of the votes for the word Feminism to be banned were from IP addresses connected to white males. Of those, 106% self identify as 'gamers', and the remaining 2.3m are either pick up artists or MRAs. The remaining 89.78% of the votes for the word Feminism to be banned were from IP addresses connected to trolls pretending to be female, but actually undertaking a false flag operation to discredit…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:37 AM
0

I laughed out loud
/r/MensRights15/11/14 10:59 PM
1

By the same logic, he would avoid buying anything with a pink ribbon on it. But he wouldn't even dream of writing such an article. After all, that would be sexist.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:35 PM
11

The eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:10 AM
31

Ah yes, the white feather. Those early feminists were so brave, we should equate their bravery with that of the men who gave their lives. The old joke about the chicken and the pig discussing breakfast applies here, I think.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:09 AM
12

The modus operandi of feminists is to choose a space where men congregate, even dominate, and penetrate that space. Then they try to control that space, usually through specious arguments such as "inclusiveness" or "harassment. Of course childbirth is one space in which men predominate. In fact, men were routinely excluded from childbirth for many years. So this article could be seen as challenging the feminist apartheid system applied to their safest of safe spaces, the delivery suite. But the …
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:22 PM
0

I'm sure he said something that justifies her defending herself against his sexist assault. In fact, you can just see that he hit her first.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:15 AM
3

I don't recognise it, as she usually has only has one topic that she recycles in every single article. Blah blah blah, misogyny. Blah blah blah secret conspiracy. Blah blah blah victimhood. In this article, she gives men the one thing that we are really crying out for. Advice on how to be a better man. From a woman. Yes indeed. A completely different article. Altogether
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:08 AM
5

Not yet. Can I ask you another question?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:02 AM
27

My ex wife used to escalate from verbal abuse to physical abuse. I would turn my back as her blows rained down on my head, shoulders and back. I wonder what the "correct" action was? I turned and walked out many, many times, until one day I turned and walked out, and never came back. My opinion? Teach women that verbal abuse (aka nagging) is still abuse, and if your partner, doesn't respond, don't resort to physical abuse. If you are a guy faced with a physically violent partner, try to reason w…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:45 PM
9

Can I comment on this post?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:34 PM
1

And apart from the feminists, there are the snakes. And the spiders. And the sharks. Not to mention the crocodiles. (I told you not to mention the crocodiles!)
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:26 AM
0

I'm not sure who "the poster" is in your comment. Imdefender, me or the male feminist Kane, to whom both Imdefender's post here and my comment on Imdefender's post are directed. If your comment is directed at me, you should know I support Imdefender's post 100% and I reject the male feminist Kane's ideas, but I respect his right to believe the myopic prejudiced fallacious toxic hate speech that he substitutes for a coherent world view. And you are right, I am a sinner :-)
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:48 PM
1

Kane needs to know that he would not be shunned if he attends again. I was at the meeting, and Kane I would be happy to listen to your opinions and beliefs, in a spirit of mutual respect and understanding. I want to live in a pluralist society, in which different opinions are accepted. I doubt I will share many of your opinions, but that's not the point, is it? I want to understand why you feel that we should be derided. And if you want a reasoned discussion in a "safe space", happy to do that t…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:37 AM
1

"Men are not victims" is like saying Vlad the Impaler had an interest in carpentry. Your welcome.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:24 AM
1

I didn't seek solace in a "self-help" book, preferring the judicial system to seek a restraining order against the woman, then a psychologist for counselling. I'm not sure I looked for a book, or that many guys would seek solace that way. I chose a female counsellor and this really helped me avoid demonizing all women as being a threat to my personal safety. Sorry this isn't the answer you wanted ;-(
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:49 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M_Zh_Azz-4 The reference was to the sudden onset of clarity about something that happened 40 years ago, when the Daily Mail offers to pay you GBP 25,000 for your "story" about Rolf's digeridoo or his extra leg.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:07 AM
1

At first I was unsure whether this was homage to British children's TV of the 1970s, or a satire of the abandonment of the presumption of innocence in favour of 'trial by social media'. Then I tumbled that "Great Uncle Bulgaria" is Jimmy Savile, amirite? I support your fundamental proposition, that a witch hunt has displaced what most of us remember as good old-fashioned coppering. Remember Dixon of Dock Green? He would say to the "middle-aged women" that you use as a leitmotif, "you might be ri…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:49 AM
3

I think there is no doubt that a change in the approach to the investigation of sexual assault cases has abandoned the presumption of innocence for accused persons, sorry, accused men, and replaced this fundamental attribute of a civilised society with the presumption of male guilt. An inevitable consequence of being believed is that you become emboldened, as it may appear that there is nothing that you can imagine that won't be taken seriously. So why stop at lighters? And of course there are n…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:30 AM
1

You are right, of course. The wording of the article doesn't matter. What does matter is that in a "he said / she said" case, gender does not influence the outcome. So if the genders were reversed, would you still be confident that the magistrate would say that his version of events carried as much weight as hers?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 08:57 AM
0

"...she had no case to answer, noting it involved the woman’s word against the complainant's" The woman's word against the complainant's? It doesn't say "a woman's word against a man's", but nor does it say "one person's word against another" I can guess that this will drift to an inevitable conclusion, because women don't lie, right?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:57 AM
2

The first amendment might not apply to the UK, as they don't even have a constitution Hate mailing feminists allows them to stamp their victim cards.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 05:45 AM
5

"Thus feminists reject the notion that women can be sexist towards men because women lack the institutional power that men have." Source You may have thought that newspeak in the novel 1984 was satire; you are wrong. It was a primer
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter