TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noisy_Corgi Archive

View 1 post and 126 comments by Noisy_Corgi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
61

Activism/SupportNoisy_Corgi/r/MensRights18/09/25 11:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Do people not realize how much its a lose/lose proposition for a man to fight a woman. If the man wins everyone shrugs and calls you a coward for not fighting someone your own size, if the woman somehow wins she gets to take an extra victory lap and dunk on you for losing to a woman. No matter what happens its bad news for the man.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:51 AM
2

You keep using the word 'hike' like its Julie Andrew's in the sound of music. This was them at 1am.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 03:01 PM
3

Considering he said the fire was in Mexico, and your article is from the Congo, I don't think that was the fire he was referring to.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 11:31 PM
13

It seems to me you've got it backward; hiding certain information that doesn't help your case is the soul of Cherry Picking.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 12:18 AM
3

So if both party's are too drunk to consent, the aggressor is the one charged, and the video shows the woman as the aggressor... why isn't she being charged with rape?
/r/MensRights11/07/24 11:00 AM
1

The key word I used was "instead" not "in addition to"
/r/MensRights08/07/24 10:24 PM
-2

I think it depends on the reason you are there. People I know have literally been to the doctor because they have the flu, and instead of addressing the fever/vomiting/clogged sinuses, the Dr. wants to talk weight loss. Like, maybe when the patient has a temp of 102°F/39°C isn't the time to discuss excersize regiments.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:41 PM
2

Why is it a bad thing for being accused of doing anything for a spouse? Not sure I'd fund that an insult if someone said it about my spouse or about me.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 05:00 PM
2

What did the women say to you?
/r/MensRights21/04/24 06:28 PM
2

That's a very interesting lived experience you are describing. Would you like to tell us more? What exactly did the women say to you to show their displeasure? What were they addressing? Can you expand on the significance of the baseball caps in your opinion? What part of the Midwest was this behavior observed? I can't say my experiences in the Midwest of America have been similar, but would love to hear more of your experiences.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 06:17 PM
2

when someone is manipulated into a relationship (especially where money is spent) on false pretenses, that person has been conned. one could even call it Fraud. they are being used.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 05:37 PM
7

Way to blame the victim.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:57 AM
1

We are the hollow men We are the stuffed men Leaning together Headpiece filled with straw. Alas! Our dried voices, when We whisper together Are quiet and meaningless As wind in dry grass Or rats' feet over broken glass In our dry cellar Shape without form, shade without colour, Paralysed force, gesture without motion;
/r/MensRights25/01/24 08:46 PM
40

you seem to be referring to something specific, but I can't quite make out what that is. what event are you referring to exactly?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:09 PM
1

The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:02 AM
1

My original post points out the content of the industry [ie the sexwork] is not necessary to account for this lack of trust. the fact that the one selling is telling the one being sold what they want to hear is enough to explain the mistrust. Therefore your contention that eradicating the porn industry will eradicate the mistrust has no proof because as I showed the content of the industry is irrelevant, and if it were not sex it could just a well be something else.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 12:31 AM
1

you've shoehorned a sex worker argument into what was only an example for a different argument. if you read the OP's post and understand it you will see its not a critique of sex workers or the porn industry (not that there's no argument to be made, it just simply isn't the one being discussed) the solution being sought is how to trust women advocating men's rights not how to solve sex work.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:39 PM
1

I don't think the trouble is the sex work at all. The trouble with trusting women promoting Men's rights while having an OnlyFans is that they are financially motivated to butter up their customers. Like trusting a cigarette company to sell you an image of cool, or a supplements company touting their research on the effectiveness of their product. The problem isn't the product it's that the source has an inherent ulterior motive.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:29 PM
1

No no you don't understand, there is no systemic misandry so any obvious Misandry is just internalized misogyny. /s (except not for posters on AITAH)
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:49 PM
4

Coke and ball hats?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:53 PM
38

It's also disingenuous because false accusers get sympathy and social support, two things that are highly motivating to humans.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 01:48 PM
1

Maybe it's just me, but that sounds like it's the care, cultivation, and breeding of houses.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 02:38 PM
1

I didn't think I was thinking about the Roman Empire all that often. But then I went to bed, picked up my kindle and realized I've been reading "The Gallic wars" by Julius Ceasar
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:54 AM
2

If you ask a feminist who says "the Patriarchy hurts men too" to describe said Patriarchy, they will almost invariably give you the textbook definition of an Oligarchy. They reject that word though cause it does carry the anti-male connotations they want to evoke.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:04 PM
5

If we wait for the perfect representative with the purest motives, it'll never happen. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good or even a place to start.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:11 AM
14

So why did they blur the women's faces in their full body shots only to have two unblurred face shots directly below the picture?
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:25 PM
7

Except there's already a word for societies in which a small group of people rule the rest, and it's not "Patriarchy" the word is Oligarchy and notice how it's not gendered. The conscious choice to use the term Patriarchy is an effort to blame Men for all of societies problems... and not just some Men, all men. Don't believe me? Check feminist messaging such as #allmenaretrash and #yesallmen .
/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:49 PM
3

The entire conversation was based on why people advocate for marriage. The historical aspect plays into that, many people's attitude don't turn on a dime.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 12:06 PM
2

You didn't really read my comment at all, these are things that traditionally marriage have done. pretty much every objection you raised has been a new development in the past 30 years, which when dealing with tradition and societal change is no time at all. Secondly, you can not deny that children do better in households with two parents. Or you could, but you would be wrong. I am not saying you or we should all go out and get married, I'm not even saying it's a good idea for men at the moment.…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:19 AM
30

Mr Marsh was also discriminated against by female colleagues who made false complaints against him. Interesting how they just stuck that at the end almost like a footnote.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 12:24 AM
4

Traditionally marriage bolsters a society by adding stability, promoting reproduction, and investing in the next generation. I'm not saying this is still true nor am I saying you should get married. But traditionally, marriage is seen as a good thing for society as a whole, which is why there are tax breaks.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 03:54 PM
2

That seems to me to be splitting hairs.part of being the virgin portion of the data is being the kind of person who decided to be a virgin before your wedding.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:00 PM
14

It was the lifeblood of "comedy" back in the "Home Improvement",/"Everybody Loves Raymond" days
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:12 PM
5

People don't want to get married, they want to get weddinged
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:46 AM
4

I mean TBF a therapist's job is to get the patient to feel better.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:42 AM
34

As another example, if you're a man and you hold a door open for an unfamiliar woman in Quebec, do not be surprised if her response is to glare at you. That's weird. I live in a place where if your less than 10 ft behind the person in front of you they are probably gonna hold the door for you regardless of who you are.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:48 AM
6

Which is why statistics has ways of measuring margin if error and statistical significance as opposed to just counting ruler numbers.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:35 PM
1

I believe the British princes are still expected to serve in the armed forces.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:21 PM
7

Dude if you filter out all the reasons women leaders go to war, then of course they never declare war, you've imagined for them a fairy world where they never need to.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:03 PM
1

Not really within the time frame studied. By 1480, the transition from battlefield leader to standing armies and rulers at home was mostly (but not entirely) complete.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:56 PM
114

They aren't worthless. They make great drill bits.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:53 AM
12

They're also literally named Bait and Switch... honestly the most surprising part of all of this is that that username wasn't taken already.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 03:14 PM
8

I would guess that looking young magnifies the "women are wonderful" effect because we think children are innocent, and so it predisposed people to see her as good and mistakes as not her fault.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:05 PM
2

The best advice I've seen on these sorts of things is if you have the rights to the picture you posted (which if you took your own picture you do) you can file a dmca takedown with Facebook which is more likely to get attention than any complaints about the group or the post breaking TOS.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:47 AM
6

Well crazy cat lady is already a thing.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:12 PM
1

So... campaigning for a political cause in front of a voting location is ok in Australia? As an American, I was waiting for the voting judges to come down HARD on these people.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:37 PM
0

It's probably because nobody really spins wool anymore (spin-ster = feminine one who spins)
/r/MensRights23/03/23 03:13 PM
4

Drink because you are happy, but never because you are miserable. Never drink when you are wretched without it, or you will be like the grey-faced gin-drinker in the slum; but drink when you would be happy without it, and you will be like the laughing peasant of Italy. Never drink because you need it, for this is rational drinking, and the way to death and hell. But drink because you do not need it, for this is irrational drinking, and the ancient health of the world. G.K. Chesterton
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:56 AM
0

Weaved into -> woven into
/r/MensRights17/03/23 02:31 PM
27

Then you might be able to file a dmca claim with Facebook that they'll be more likely to take seriously. Thread from legaladvice: https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/11oko4o/my_picture_was_posted_on_a_vigilante_anti
/r/MensRights15/03/23 11:41 PM
24

The picture they used to post you on Facebook, did you take that picture?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:19 PM
37

If you took the profile pic that was used, you can file a dmca claim to make them take it down.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:01 PM
1

Could also slot in under "sexism". Edit: as in its pointing out sexism against men
/r/MensRights10/03/23 01:57 AM
7

I mean... there's no reason to stop pushing for privileges when you are the one reaping the rewards. Like waiting for a billionaire decide they have enough money.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 10:15 PM
6

Only if she's 5'3"
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:47 AM
1

This may seem silly but it's indicative of the way Men are seen in today's culture: We must be swift as the coursing river (Be a man) With all the force of a great typhoon (Be a man) With all the strength of a raging fire Mysterious as the dark side of the moon Show me where there is space for feelings in this well-known chorus. You can't cause it's not part of the definition of manhood. No one cares about your feelings as a man.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:19 PM
4

I do understand you as a woman seems to focus on the "feeling" aspect of things. It's not a feeling. It's a fact. Also, "feeling" cared means nothing without real meaningful action or outcomes. Because feeilings don't put food on your table. Feelings do not put a roof over your head. You can't pay child support, alimoney, or your medical bills with feelings. You can't use feelings to fund your retirement As much as I understand your point men don't get physical help. Feelings very much matter. B…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 06:50 PM
13

If you have to be there when the database finishes you actually can do that, cause you'd legally be "on call" and that's time they have to pay you (albeit at a lower rate I think)
/r/MensRights01/03/23 12:26 AM
9

Use it to your advantage start making slow cooker recipes and say you've done 8 hours of chores.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 12:22 AM
6

Man responsible for woman shooting kid because man checks notes had sex 7 years ago.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:22 PM
7

No true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:20 PM
3

your divisions of the God of Old and New Testaments is a heresy known as Marcionism—just FYI.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 02:48 PM
5

It was only when a lot of the men went away for war that women started taking more prominent roles in church Point of historical fact, the very early church was filled with women and slaves, the underclasses were the early adopters of the faith.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:20 PM
7

Curiously, I don't think I've ever read a book by a male author that has a love triangle in it. You mean besides "12th Night" ?
/r/MensRights26/01/23 03:58 AM
1

Wow the gender empathy gap is real. Being a teenager does not make cruel, heartless behavior excusable. Also, it's true the narrarator is a teenager and they aren't the most reliable sources, so it funny you just believe her carte blanche
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:05 PM
4

I don't know how people can defend shifty behavior like ridiculing your own father like that but here we are.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:51 AM
12

Can you think of a more cruel way to get that point across? Cause I can't. Humiliation while your family looks on and laughs sounds like the most demoralizing, soul sucking thing possible.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:48 AM
3

The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones
/r/MensRights12/09/22 11:21 AM
1

The point isn't whether marriage is good or bad, the point is the stats I was replying to are pulled from thin air and frankly even if they were correct have very little bearing on whether OP's marriage is statistically likely to succeed or fail. The statistics of 50% of marriages end in divorce (not sure where 68 came from except thin air) is arrived at by the simple calculation of the # of recorded marriages in the US divided by the number of recorded divorces.... which is about the same stati…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:53 AM
0

Ends Unnhappily IE in divorce... Meaning that percentage does not end in Divorce
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:28 PM
0

You really have a reading comprehension problem. Never said anything about divorce ending happily... I can actually support my stats can you? Ps. It's really sad you are so bitter about marriage that you have to project negative assumptions and statistics on other people's life.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:15 PM
-4

You realize that even with your negative data, that 1/3 of the population is married after 10 years and there is plenty of room for OP's anecdotal happy ending in that statistic? Honestly as someone who married their first fuck their statistics of a happy marriage drastically improve. Even given your statistic of 68% of marriages ending in divorce, that doesn't mean 68% of first marriages end unhappily, because people who divorce once are a lot more likely to have more than one failed marriage a…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:58 PM
5

Sounded to me like another driver whose idea of "flowing with traffic" is two inches behind my bumper going 70 (obvious hyperbole) and think that's good driving... nothing to do with gender but I've had enough assholes do this then change lanes and drive up the next person's ass too. Usually I clean my windshield watch them have to wipe theirs and slow down a bit and that gets them changing lanes.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 02:42 AM
5

I could do it with an academic grant and 2 years... it's because women have to see this unattainable goal that they'll never get to have sex with and so its torturing them to show it as available.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:00 PM
14

gouges herself on the most expensive ​ this is probably a typo but in case it's not... I believe the word you want is gorges aka "eat a large amount greedily; fill oneself with food." ​ to gouge is "make (a groove, hole, or indentation) with or as with a sharp tool or blade." or here in North America it can mean to "overcharge or swindle."
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:06 PM
7

How's it a waste of time unless that time is "better" spent with someone who can have children? which unless the woman thinks she can somehow change the man's mind or otherwise use his fertility despite his explicit will against it, is already the situation of a man who does not want children but can have them. If the woman thinks she can change the man's mind, then she is wasting the man's time and it's just as bad as the reverse.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:17 PM
3

Just to be clear I was quoting and responding to a posted comment above. The quoted comment is awful and I am condemning it. I am suggesting the two different approaches don't reflect on the difference in situation, merely how much the parent love the different children.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 08:40 PM
6

>If my son banged the music teacher I would have a talk with my son. If my daughter got r@ped by the music teacher then he would be in the hospital, morgue or prison. See there is a difference. ​ A difference in how much you love your children maybe... ​ >We all had that teacher we would have slept with given the opportunity. Every. Single. One. Of. Us. A) how do you know this was that teacher and not the creepy one and ​ B) imagination is different from reality.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 07:45 PM
5

Yes Earl is a POS... so it's ok to glorify murder if that man is guilty of wrongdoing? How wrong does the act of the man have to be before it's totally cool to revel in his murder? Does Acteon (who accidentally saw Diana naked while she bathed) deserve his fate? At what point does the woman just get to decide that a man has to die?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:05 PM
9

Are there quite a few songs glamorizing killing men? Uhhh... "Earl Had to Die" by the Dixie Chicks off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:45 PM
6

Well then you should know that version is only from Ovid who is a fairly late addition.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 11:41 PM
1

That's not a point, just a distracting (albeit clever) play on words
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:31 AM
1

Prime example is What Amber Turd did to Johnny Depp So your and my views in this line up exactly, but I got to ask: what rhetorical edge or meaningful thing do you accomplish by intentionally messing with Amber's actual name? I'm curious.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:53 PM
7

Depends on the time period. King Henry V died by being shot in the face on campaign. Richard III was surrounded and killed on the field of Battlefield of Bosworth. Edit HRE Charles V went on campaign. And toured the front lines regularly, his forces captured the King Francis of France at the battle of Pavia.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:03 PM
7

What about mandatory vaccinations?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:38 AM
21

Admitting they're wrong on this is also admitting a fault in the Duluth model, another thing Hollywood wokeism is unable to do.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:07 AM
7

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. Cs lewis
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:54 AM
1

I know that's supposed to be a metaphor or something, but that technically excludes most of Europe from being feminist.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:44 AM
3

Yup, what a shocker: Grandma and Grandpa knew what they were about when they waited till marriage. 50+ years of happiness wasn't an accident.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:25 AM
2

To reduce it down to "misogyny" is obviously overly reductionist and incorrect. It is however, also overly reductionist and incorrect to completely discount the role that anti-woman sentiment played in the witch hunting craze. Reading the Maleficium Maleficarum, there's a significant amount of prejudice displayed with pontificating about why women are so prone to devil worship. Edit: pretending there wasn't anti woman sentiment back then is just disingenuous.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 10:11 PM
2

Yeah I don't think chivalry was ever so formally codified during the middle ages.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:19 PM
3

Where are you getting your code of chivalry?
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:02 PM
4

Chivalry was the practice of courtiers paying homage to high status women, if $30 for a steak is not pocket change for you, chivalry never applied to you.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:54 PM
1

And what I'm saying is that mental stability has no correlation with being, dishonest or vengeful. So such an undertaking would really tell you nothing about the situation at hand (except maybe add to the prejudice)
/r/MensRights09/01/22 02:29 PM
9

Plenty of mentally stable people commit crimes.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:13 PM
1

I don't precisely know how it would work for balls, but I do know that old school fencing teaching was to put a mask on the kid, and hit him in the face for however long it took to get him to stop blinking/wincing.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 05:57 PM
4

What you say is Heresy, but for real, it's called Marcionism.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:52 PM
19

It's worse than you realize, men are actually not going to higher education anymore. Men are becoming a minority on the university campus.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 11:37 AM
-5

This is kindergarten "to wrongs make a right" logic.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:58 PM
72

This right here is precisely and explicitly what tenure is for. To give the educator the ability to challenge the current science without losing position.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:21 PM
4

I mean... yeah, pleading the belly goes back to at least the late 14th century. that's what Mary Reade and Anne Bonny did.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 01:55 PM
-1

That's not true, if you go look at the BLM monuments there are a decent amount of women named, Breonna Taylor is one that jumps to mind. There are definitely less women than men, but women are still noticeably present.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:54 PM
1

It's the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 09:40 PM
2

Whatever two people work out in an active, loving relationship is fine. It's coming into a relationship with these overblown expectations that need to be met that's so abhorrent.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 09:39 PM
31

No, I actually get it. The kid sees the man as his dad, he refused to take the paternity because genetics don't matter to him. by taking the mother to court, the dad is declaring in front of everyone that the kid isn't his. That has gotta feel like being disowned, and being disowned tends to put a strain on relationships.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 03:18 AM
3

I feel like SCUM is one of those texts (like mein kampf) that have affected modern discourse enough that even though its content is abhorrent it should be available.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 03:12 PM
8

The author argues that it could potentially save a marriage if both partners are open to the idea, That's not saving the marriage that's just saving the box it came in and putting a sticker where it should be. It might look like new but it's still empty inside.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:15 PM
1

That's such mishmash of whig history, and conspiracy theory and general r/atheism dogmatic drivel that I don't even know where to begin disabusing you of these false ideas. You need to go back and study the history of the western world. All of this is besides my original point. Which is that good people DO need society to tell them what's good and your original assertion otherwise is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:26 PM
1

Your argument makes no sense. I just showed how every person is shaped by society to know what's right, and Religion is a part of that society. It's been fundamental in shaping what we consider good and evil. Blaming religion for all the bad people is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:41 PM
2

3 things are happening here 1) current emotions color our memories, your current empathy can and does color your memory of your actions in your childhood. 2) by the time you begin forming memories adult you can still access, the process of indoctrination has been going on for about 3 years already. 3) you don't notice indoctrination because it's ubiquitous and all around you all the time. Becuase society has agreed to what is right, and it reflects that back at you.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:41 PM
2

A good person doesn't need society to tell them what is right or wrong. Understanding how to behave is inherent and self-evident. What do you think upbringing entails? The process of raising a child is a process of indoctrination of right and wrong. The reason it seems self evident to you, is because the process has done its job. If you think religion hasn't fundamentally informed that whole system then you're being willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:24 PM
6

I thought so too, so I went to removeddit and scrolled and scrolled and scrolled, to find a not awful comment. It's TRUE they were negative karma but there was a metric shit ton of these and worse comments.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:00 AM
2

Clearly you've not spent significant time with children.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:35 AM
1

I immediately thought of Belle Gunness. Women who murder their men have their own category black widow killers.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:07 PM
1

This is literally the bowl of skittles logic.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:19 PM
12

This basically, the whole "Men are trash" is not really about You (and some feminists will admit that when you say you aren't Trash) it's a power play, where feminists try to exert control by publicly rejecting the people they see as enemies. If you don't care then they don't have the power anymore.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:00 PM
3

I don't think there's necessarily a therapist running the support group.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:22 PM
2

/r/suicidebywords
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:21 PM
16

Mr Justice Cohen said the woman was 'full of remorse'. After 8 years, I'm sure she's just sorry she got caught.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 06:32 PM
3

I hate to throw a monkey wrench into the math, but we don't know how they accounted for the "children" category. That could be taking up a part of that 75%
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:32 PM
3

Learned Helplessness
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:30 PM
1

In a world with no separation of Church and State in which they support each other, a Heretic is a subversive dissident.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:25 PM
4

If that vegetable has a very good chance of developing brain waves if given 9 months than most people would find pulling the plug immorral yes.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:13 PM
-1

So if I like my job, I'm obligated to cross the picket line? I'm not following the logic here...
/r/MensRights14/05/19 09:27 PM
2

Right... what I'm saying is a stiletto is a thrusting knife that originally didn't have an edge it was just a spike, and a stiletto heel is just a spike coming from the heel of a shoe. There's more similarities than differences. She might as well have taken one of these to his head as one of these these. The damage done wouldn't be all that different. So it may be technically incorrect, but I doubt this poor guys skull appreciates the nuance.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:51 AM
6

There's a reason that those shoes are called that though... it's not a coincidence.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter