Nokonoko Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Innocent man stabbed in the head by screaming woman who mistook him for someone that "threatened" her with rape. Too many sig figs, UselessConversionBot …	/r/MensRights	21/08/13 01:34 AM
3	A feminist writer's disgusting anti-male tweet about the NRA's idea for having armed guards in schools. But I thought that straw feminists weren’t real! /s	/r/MensRights	22/12/12 05:39 AM
8	Man asks do I know you. Says No I dont. Walks away. Files police report As others have already identified, it’s only sub-s 3 that fits the facts here. It’s important to note that while the “apprehension of physical injury” is a physical element, ie, is based on the subjective psychology of the victim, there is also a requirement to establish (beyond reasonable doubt) the defendant’s intent to cause this apprehension. Of course, the only way to be totally sure is to consult the case law of that jurisdiction, but this is what the drafting suggests. Common sense and th…	/r/MensRights	26/10/12 02:05 PM
5	Speaker of the House resigns after outrage after "misogynist" comments. He survived sexually harassing a man, but using the c-word was apparently much worse. I think it’s important to get the facts straight. The govt, led by Gillard, supported Slipper — he decided on his own to resign because Abbott and his minions were making things into a sideshow. It’s exactly the same thing that transpired with Craig Thompson, with the government finally suspending him from the party after months of standing behind him, as Abbott and the LNP were then — as now — insistent that the House of Reps should be a kangaroo court. You are right that there’s no evidence th…	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 01:53 PM
3	Cut off a penis and murder a man? 3 years parole, if you're a woman. This is the judgment, for those who are curious. Unsurprisingly, the facts were more complicated than the News Corp article would have you believe. Note the judge factored in a 25% sentence reduction for the “utilitarian value” of her guilty plea. [121] That is, all things being equal, the head sentence would’ve been 9 years instead of 6 years and 9 months. Honestly, it still seems inadequate. An appeal by the DPP isn’t outside the realm of possibility.	/r/MensRights	30/08/12 10:17 AM
2	Two teen girls abduct, torture, and sexually assault autistic boy. Hardly any mention in the media. Imagine if the genders were reversed. Depends on the jurisdiction. The Qld Criminal Code construction of rape in s 349(2)(a), “carnal knowledge with or of the other person without the other person’s consent”, seems expansive enough. A basic offence of “sexual assault” (which is what they’ve apparently been charged with) against s 352 is, for all intents and purposes, what’s called “indecent assault” elsewhere. The quintessential indecent assault is groping, and the maximum penalty is 10 years (whereas it’s life for rape). However, s…	/r/MensRights	22/07/12 06:14 AM
6	Kacy Wilson, 28, rapes boy. Charged with "unlawful sexual activity." Article jokes about rape. actual rape The law no longer formulates rape as occurring against the will of the (female) victim. The criminalising circumstance is the absence of consent. A lot of people might say, like you, that ‘actual’ or ‘true’ rape is by a stranger, after a clear struggle, etc, but that’s actually incredibly rare.	/r/MensRights	07/05/12 11:51 PM
2	What if women don’t need guys any more, and guys don’t care? [Rebuttal to article] Curricula. ;)	/r/MensRights	29/03/12 11:29 AM
3	Found this on FaceBook, what do you guys think, do men have the right to an opion on abortion? The idea that "any person, or group of people, can be prohibited from having an OPINION on something" is so monumentally stupid and ignorant that it shouldn't even warrant a response from anyone. I once made the mistake of pressing someone on this in a Facebook discussion, being totally civil, and got something vague about ‘self-determination’ along with some scathing insults in return. So you’re absolutely right.	/r/MensRights	03/02/12 03:19 AM
1	I was called a "Jew" and "Gay" and a "Douche" for my thoughts. … women weren't allowed to vote and whatnot for thousands of years … It’s a shame that most people have no knowledge of history. Forget the boring nitty-gritty, just the broad themes are fascinating. Comparatively, it was a really recent thing even that all men could vote, and not just wealthy property owners. Or our modern concept of a representative democracy for that matter.	/r/MensRights	23/12/11 04:46 AM
7	My wife just came back from Child Protective Services mediation training and told me that they teach that the man is ALWAYS the aggressor. If you want my opinion, that e-mail needed a little redrafting. Asking a pardon for crude language is insincere. Don’t get me wrong, the premise of your question should very rightly put her on the defensive no matter how you phrase it, but you’ve given her a reason to dismiss you out of hand. Also, I really think that, ‘X, no — 2X!’ should be confined to rhetoric, but that’s just a stylistic opinion. Anyway, I would like to say good on you for actually taking the step of sending an e-mail. Nothi…	/r/MensRights	15/12/11 08:33 AM
8	According to a new law in China, residential property is no longer to be regarded as jointly owned and divided equally in the event of a divorce. Instead, whoever paid for the apartment or house is the legal owner and gets to keep it in its entirety. Too many women were profiting from divorce. Yes, but now you’re talking about fair and equitable compensation. That’s a different idea to the concept of a right to half the marriage property.	/r/MensRights	30/10/11 11:03 PM
1	Site encourages women to take pictures of men on London underground without their knowledge, then upload them so their appearance and clothes can be rated and bitched on - but men taking photos of women is not allowed as 'it feels different'. ‘It's not the same …’ What a shocking lack of introspection.	/r/MensRights	26/08/11 07:15 AM
6	Morning after regret If both of the people are ‘shit-faced’, did they rape each other?	/r/MensRights	21/07/11 01:56 PM
5	If you ever let your girlfriend / wife get away with 'hormones' or 'PMS' as an excuse for their crazy behavior, you are reinforcing that behavior and they will do it again. So please stop fucking accepting that excuse. Require reason or replace. You never know when people might suddenly pop in to offer you their sword, though.	/r/MensRights	06/05/11 12:49 PM
0	No way around it - feminists here encourage misogyny. But for some reason, here on Reddit, we upvote posts made with novelty accounts by virtue of username. Is it time to put a stop to it?	/r/MensRights	27/03/11 09:53 AM
1	After getting 4 years for killing her boyfriend, she is writing a PhD thesis on women who commit crimes. There’s a book about the trial written by a journalist, titled Joe Cinque’s Consolation, if anyone’s interested in reading further.	/r/MensRights	13/12/10 04:55 AM
2	What is wrong with this definition? I see — it’s taken verbatim from the New Oxford American Dictionary (looked up in OS X’s Dictionary.app). That’s pretty disappointing, when it’s otherwise such a useful reference tool.	/r/MensRights	06/06/10 10:36 AM
1	Rape should not include regretted sex, obviously, but I am curious as to the opinions about the following. To use another analogy: if I give you an mp3 player, but ask you not to take it apart, it doesn't become theft if you ignore my wishes and take it apart anyway...it may make you a douchebag, but you're not a thief. Of course it doesn’t make it theft — but you can absolutely sue me for that. =p I live in Australia, BTW. There are essentially no open access points, because data plans are just so expensive. T__T And I disagree. A) both the homeowner and the woman would have to explicitly state that…	/r/MensRights	07/04/10 11:46 AM
1	Rape should not include regretted sex, obviously, but I am curious as to the opinions about the following. Cheers for the downvote. And yet I’m not saying it should or shouldn’t be a criminal offence or civil damages heading either way. We can't legislate away everything we don't like...THAT is the path to tyranny. Which is why I brought up (ideally evidence-based) public policy reasons. Viz— Or let's outlaw the deception of a woman claiming she has a diaphragm in...or poking holes in a condom. —The question I’m posing is: would there, purely theoretically, be a good reason for parliament to step in?…	/r/MensRights	07/04/10 07:08 AM
-3	Rape should not include regretted sex, obviously, but I am curious as to the opinions about the following. That’s not a useful metaphor. Not only is there no valid public policy-related reason to legislate to discourage people from lying about taking their shoes off, The argument could be made that if the guest’s right to enter was given with the strict condition that their shoes must be kept off at all times when indoors, it is automatically “revoked” as soon as they do so. In any case, I would agree that what the OP described shouldn’t be considered to be “rape” in the sense that we use the word. D…	/r/MensRights	07/04/10 01:39 AM