TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noltu Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by Noltu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Yeah, it's so odd how people take basic self-protection as though it's some huge responsibility or impediment on life. It really shows how privileged some people are when not jogging at night or not leaving a drink unattended is some big statement for them.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:29 AM
13

It's generally bad practice wherever you live to walk alone with headphones on, especially at night. People still commonly do it in many places, but, especially in some bigger cities and less developed countries, you'd get laughed at for thinking you deserve to be that unaware of your surroundings and get home safe.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:41 PM
-1

Assuming this is true, why did all of those guys let her do that to them anyway? If they're all college or professional athletes I would expect them to be able to physically prevent her from assaulting them even if there was no security.
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 06:19 PM
2

What? You want to actively ban people from having sex or something? No, all that I said was that sex does have negative consequences that should be taken into account by whoever wants to engage in it. If you decide that you never want to have a baby, you should abstain from sex or utilize contraception, however, I do not think you should have the right to an abortion barring any of the well-understood legitimate circumstances.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:22 PM
4

Am I just supposed to never have sex? Yeah? You aren't entitled to have sex nor is it a biological necessity. You could also just have sex with the knowledge that there are negative consequences to it while using many of the forms of contraception that are available.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:02 PM
1

Why?
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:29 PM
2

That's actually a very good point to bring up to anyone actually pretending like this woman has a point, don't we even apply the law differently to babies as well? So it doesn't invalid Texas's view on abortion to not count the fetus as a passenger here. This woman is just wasting public resources on a flawed case and should be embarrassed with the amount of media attention it's gotten.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:26 PM
1

That's because you were missing the point, the fetus riding with her doesn't reduce the amount of cars on the road, so the whole point of HOV lanes wouldn't be successful. She's just an idiot wasting public resources on something that has no merit and furthering this with the help of the media. She should be embarrassed with herself.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:24 PM
0

It's not like the fetus can just drive another car if not allowed to stay with the mother, so no, that defeats the purpose of HOV lanes.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:22 PM
0

Not really, if those lanes are added to encourage carpooling since two or more sharing a car means one less car on the road, the fetus shouldn't matter since it's not like it was going to drive another car instead of riding with the mother.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:19 PM
1

I see now my mistake, apologies. I don't think it should be legally permissible for parents to force their children to vote, I'm sorry I didn't make it clear enough for you. Edit: Are we done here now?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 06:10 PM
1

Babies usually don't have the desire to or cognitive ability to even comprehend what voting is, so unless their parents force them to, which they shouldn't, they wouldn't be able to or want to vote, they just now wouldn't be legally barred from doing so.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:59 PM
1

Do you even read my comments? 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:48 PM
1

U.S. citizen, registered, and meet residency requirements as usual. Babies usually don't have the desire to or cognitive ability to even comprehend what voting is, so unless their parents force them to, which they shouldn't, they wouldn't be able to or want to vote, they just now wouldn't be legally barred from doing so.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:47 PM
1

As I have already said, no, but if you are going to implement it at all, it definitely shouldn't be 18.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:39 PM
1

You said that blanket 16 to drive and 18 to vote are "unfair." I did not say that they were controversial or that people agree with me on it as you seem to suggest that I did. You are the one who can't keep track of what you're saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:28 PM
1

LOL, the age limits to serve in Congress and for President are not controversial at all. Very few people think that they should be eliminated. It is a total non-issue. Spoken by someone clearly terminally online and out of touch with politics outside of Reddit. And as for age limits for driving and voting, you are in an empty room on that one too. Pretty much everyone thinks that there should be an minimum age to drive and vote. I never claimed otherwise. Who are you talking to? Not all discrimi…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 05:15 PM
1

Not all discrimination is "unfair." We agree on that, that's why I try to specify "unfair discrimination." People under 18 can't vote. That is unfair since 18 is such an arbitrary age, why not do so for when people are fully developed mentally if you'll do it at all? People under 16 can't drive. Also unfair, but at least this one is more understandable than what you want to discriminate for. You have to be 25 to serve in the house, 30 in the Senate, and 35 to be President. That is discrimination…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 04:49 PM
1

You waste your time typing a novel with nothing of value in it. >Diseases that reduce your intelligence and work capacity? So if I'm a healthy 75 year old who is still in control of all of my mental faculties, I should be forcibly ostracized from my place of work just because some people in my age group present a real danger in part due to their diseases related to their age? >Do you see paraplegics in fire departments? Did you really think this was a good argument? A paraplegic literally has an…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 04:32 PM
1

That's right. It also isn't "ageist" to deny people under 35 the opportunity to become President or people under 30 to serve in the Senate. It is ageist. And it is extremely difficult to create and implement objective means to weed out people with age related problems, which are 100% guaranteed to emerge for everyone at some point. So, it's hard to stop unfair discrimination, so let's just implement more of it. Also, who told you everyone develops the problems you were specifically referring to …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 04:15 PM
3

Doing so ensures that the ones with age-related problems no longer stay on the job. So you're proposing that an entire age group be excluded from holding a position just so that those who present the problems you're targeting don't get in? How is that not ageist? One judge with Alzheimer's can cause catastrophic problems for many, many people. And yes, it is a very real thing. There are federal judges in their 90s that don't know what day it is, yet are still on the bench. So provide a way to ge…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 03:57 PM
-1

So because you're at higher risk for a certain group of diseases you should be barred for holding political office? Also, certain jobs are particularly well-staffed by certain age groups, nothing about that is wrong. Not every occupation needs to have a majority of people in the average age of an American.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 02:09 PM
-1

It is ageism to have arbitrary cutoff points for people to have jobs when they are physically and mentally capable.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 01:56 PM
2

I'm pro-life, although it seems like OP was just relating this to feminism as a whole and how it can backfire on them rather than pushing a pro-choice agenda.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 07:02 AM
2

Why you acting as if being uninvolved and ignorant of your political system is cool?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 06:58 AM
-4

Classic Reddit ageism.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/22 06:55 AM
1

No.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 08:33 PM
1

Damn, sorry, I didn't know that could really happen.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 05:46 AM
3

Fair point, I guess I assumed that this was a house they owned.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:29 PM
-1

How are you losing your house and belongings because of a false accusation of rape?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:15 PM
2

for example if you rape someone you get 50 years in prison, if you accuse someone of rape and it's proven beyond any reasonable doubt that he didn't do it, you get at least 30? 50 years in prison sounds like a lot for rape. Honestly, I'd probably say it should be a maximum of 15 years for rape and 1-2 years for a false report of rape. Regardless, I don't think we should have it where someone who's accused of rape will lose everything, we should probably target the institutions that will fire peo…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter