TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NonnyNu Archive

View 0 posts and 151 comments by NonnyNu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Woman here. Please replace “do better” with “look in different places, like church.” No need to read the article.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:55 AM
2

So how does she explain all the women who are also not watching her movie?
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:46 PM
8

Woman here. I will say this. I agree that men should have the right to financially abort for the same time period as the woman does. I think that that time period should end at the moment of conception. It’s not fair that women get all those excuses to abort but when it comes to men, it’s always, “He knew what would potentially happen if he had sex. He should’ve kept his dick in his pants if he didn’t want kids!” Well, the woman knew, too. So why does she get a pass? Is she not as intelligent as…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 07:28 PM
7

No idea what is a pick me but it is my pleasure to stand up for fairness!
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:25 AM
5

This is a good question. Is the kid even his? It certainly explains why she’d concoct such a story. Make up a story about domestic violence and get him so busy defending it that he didn’t even ask this question. This way, she gets out of the marriage AND gets child support.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 09:00 PM
6

Agree. OP needs to do this the way Katie Holmes left Tom Cruise.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 08:59 PM
7

You need to get a nanny cam to capture these episodes. It’s your only hope in defending yourself legally. She’s going to involve the cops. It’s not a question of if but of when. That’s why she’s recording you. Use your baby as the excuse for having a nanny cam. If she’s doing this to you, what’s she doing to the baby? Edit: She probably has her eye on another guy and just developing a “story” to justify her leaving you and why she has a baby but no husband.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 08:56 PM
8

You should try working for a fair company. Try PureFlix? It’s not just religious programming there. I’m sure they could use your expertise to improve their content and distribution. Why not support a company that supports you? Also,,try the company started by John Schneider (of Dukes of Hazard fame). P.S. I cancelled my Netflix subscription several years ago exactly bc of the woke programming. Even with their recent house cleaning and virtue signaling in the opposite direction, I’m not going bac…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 08:37 PM
3

Wow. Woman here. I would think that an abused woman would still flinch at unexpected movements from her mate even if the mate repented and stopped abusing her. It’s just muscle memory, I think (brain is a muscle). So I don’t know how a man could be fairly expected to just forgive and forget. He can forgive bc that’s a choice but forgetting isn’t really up to him. And unless he can forget, I don’t see how he can have a proper, trusting relationship with his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 09:49 PM
13

You won’t be able to change her. That includes being an exemplary man and waiting for her to change. She won’t change. You can’t save her. Save yourself and leave. Edit: She needs to spend time with herself. You might actually be standing in the way of that. Think of it that way.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:20 AM
2

The patriarchy is at it again!
/r/MensRights12/07/22 09:16 PM
1

This doctor has some understanding of it. You should check out what he says. https://youtu.be/N2e02QdzJgg
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:15 PM
2

You should educate yourself. Cardiac contractions can be observed after 3 weeks. https://youtu.be/N2e02QdzJgg
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:14 PM
5

I don’t understand why it’s ok to rule based upon one’s gender or race but not ok to rule based upon one’s conservative interprets of the Constitution?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:35 PM
7

I believe that all troubles in the world are the result of old white men and white supremacy. Didn’t you read the memo? It makes life so much easier to understand.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:30 PM
1

The links I gave above literally have the reasons that the women gave for their abortions. I provide them again below. And who is “they” when you say “they also banned it for the people who need to abort bc it’s a life or death situation?” Do you mean SCOTUS? No, they didn’t. They just said that states can choose to allow abortions, prohibit abortions, or anything in between. It’s up to each state. Do you mean the states that have trigger laws? Bc even Missouri, which has the most restrictive la…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:11 PM
1

Guttmacher puts harm to mother at 4% in 2004.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:06 PM
1

“I'm libertarian. I don't force others to conform to my moral beliefs.” Of course, you do. You expect others to conform to your belief that people shouldn’t murder or steal from others, right? If making others conform to one’s moral beliefs would disqualify one from being libertarian, then you disqualified. Please change your political affiliation to “Fascist.” Now you will say that murder and theft are prohibited by laws and not morals. But laws are only the legislation of mutually agreed upon …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:48 PM
1

I didn’t say that they shouldn’t be considered. But the 3% who face a life or death situation should not be used by the 97% to justify abortion being used to correct a bad decision.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:45 PM
2

It’s not over if you don’t shrink from it and you don’t apologize. The man probably most reviled by feminists is Donald Trump. No matter if you’re a Dem or a Republican, you know it’s not over for Orange Man.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:34 AM
1

I support women and men choosing NOT to have sex when they can’t afford to have a child. I support women and men who are low income AND fully employed receiving subsidies for birth control. If I get pregnant, I do not believe it’s anyone else’s responsibility to raise that child. I expect the same level and sense of responsibility from all other individuals who are of the age to understand and have the knowledge that sex leads to pregnancy. Edit. Re your “minuscule” scenario in which the mother’…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:07 AM
1

Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion research org. It’s been all over the news. The chart: https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/tables/370305/3711005t3.pdf The report: https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2005/reasons-us-women-have-abortions-quantitative-and-qualitative-perspectives
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:01 AM
4

I don’t understand why BOTH men and women can’t just accept that pregnancy is a consequence of having sex, whether protected or under birth control or not, and that, if and when a pregnancy results, the man and woman come together to care for the child? Why can’t men and women just agree to be responsible? Isn’t that fairest for all concerned? Don’t drag out rape, incest, or harm to mother. That’s literally less than 5% of all abortions.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:21 AM
-8

Sorry to inject another issue but just remember that it’s women like her who want to use abortions as birth control. Well-behaved women tend to be anti-abortion. Why? Bc those women take responsibility for their own actions. So don’t try to go the high road and think that men supporting women’s “right to choose” will be reciprocated. It won’t. It’ll be seen by those irresponsible women as a sign of weakness. You know, like the abused boyfriend who still pleaded with officers not to take his abus…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:31 AM
3

I bet she accused the male cop of touching her inappropriately when he searched her pocket. That’s why they had to drop the charges.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:25 AM
1

Woke “men.” Sorry, guys. It’s the truth. You complain here all day about your rights getting trounced and you don’t even see that women who would abort their own baby would have qualms aborting your rights. Pull your heads out, pls.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:12 PM
1

You are talking about a minuscule proportion. MINUSCULE. Only disingenuous people trot that out and complete ignore the over 97% of abortions that are used as birth control where there is no risk to the woman’s life.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:10 PM
1

Rape accounts for only AT MOST 3% of abortions. Let’s not be disingenuous. Call it what it is: The vast majority of women who get abortions use it as birth control. Further, if folks are concerned with rape victims not being able to abort, then start a fund for rape victims to go to another state to get the abortion, and jail those who claim rape falsely.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:07 PM
8

Woman here. If it’s “my body, my choice,” then why isn’t the pregnancy considered a result of the woman’s choice to allow sperm to reach her eggs? For those who are reaching for the “but rapes…” excuse, JUST STOP. Rapes account for AT MOST 3% of abortions. And many women who are raped give birth to their babies and some even keep them afterwards. So just stop that shitty retort. Men: Here’s my message to you as a woman who supports men’s rights and takes compete responsibility for my own choices…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:12 PM
11

This isn’t about men supporting women. It’s about whether a human should be able to kill another human who is in fetus form. Whether a person is a man or woman doesn’t enter into the equation. Each person must make their own decision as to whether abortion is right. Don’t look at it as men supporting women. Personally, I’m against abortion and I’m a woman. It’s wrong. Being against abortion as a man doesn’t make you a misogynist. Make your own decision, independent of sex.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:02 PM
2

Woman here. Until about a year ago, I wasn’t aware that males could get an erection under duress.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 02:08 AM
4

It’s misogynistic just to ask that question. ✌️🤡
/r/MensRights08/05/22 02:22 AM
0

A good argument to make against what? I’m just saying that women who want an abortion are given a choice, whether it’s an easy choice or not, to get an abortion. Baby boys are not given the choice of being circumcized or not. What’s the problem With that argument? What is “not good” about it? You stated that without explanation.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:29 AM
28

Agree. Every time you raise this in argument, the other side will say “it’s complicated.” What’s complicated is they can’t explain away their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 11:12 PM
22

Under Roe v. Wade, no state can outlaw abortions. but even if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, women who don’t want to give birth can go to a state where abortions are legal to abort their child. This option is not given to baby boys re circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:28 AM
211

Bc males, and especially baby males, are only 3/5 of a human being. Didn’t you get the memo?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:25 AM
2

Maybe the tide is turning. 👍👍👍
/r/MensRights26/04/22 04:56 PM
6

It’s sad that there needs to be dating strategies now. I’d rather be alone. (Woman here.)
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:01 PM
7

Do you want the baby to save it from its mother? I don’t get the sense that your concerns are financial.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 05:42 PM
86

Putting the man into a situation where he could produce a child against his own wishes, and then demanding he pay for it later. The rape isn’t just at that moment.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 02:57 AM
21

This is what makes the makeup of refugees from Syria suspect.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:53 AM
3

Omg. Did your ban message say that the ban was not based upon what content you’d posted and based only upon the fact that you participated in r/mensrights? Did it also say that you could get unbanned by replying to the message with a promise that you would never go back to r/mensrights? I got a similar message except it was from the mods at r/cats and they banned me for participating in a sub about COVID.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 10:51 AM
6

I think the feminists are too far gone. I would focus more on people who have no idea that a Men’s Rights perspective exists and WHY it exists.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 08:20 AM
1

I am being real. It’s hard enough on the kid and both parents in a divorce. When a parent isn’t living with his/her kid and the Court has ordered that they get to see their kid at a specific time and at no other time, you bet that parent is going to go ballistic when the other parent does not produce the kid as ordered. The mom knew that. I would be willing to bet that this isn’t the first time either. She tried to get back at him using his kid.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 08:54 PM
4

Agree. I thought he was arguing only about jobs, not about infidelity.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:49 PM
17

Probably wherever Mike Tyson is from. 😬
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:47 PM
2

What would happen if you said yes to divorce but no to the planning? I mean, she wants it, so she should plan it, right?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:44 PM
64

The mom shouldn’t have been playing “hide the kid.” It’s her fault.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:26 AM
2

We should be sad for anyone who spent time looking nice for another and got rejected. But you’re right, if the tables were turned the woman would get applauded and the man would not receive any sympathy at all.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 08:23 AM
5

Good fix. 👍
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:34 PM
3

I can understand what she’s feeling bc I’ve felt that before. However, a sane person would just stop and let the guys behind walk past and then walk behind them, not post asking all men to change normal waking to cater to the one person.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:52 AM
9

Agree 100%. The baby is as much the father’s as it is the mother’s.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:34 AM
4

Can you provide reasoning why? I mean beyond the “my body, my choice” bc the mother had a choice in conceiving or not (except in rape, which is the extreme minority of situations) but the baby didn’t.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:31 AM
3

Same here.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:25 AM
2

You have family. They are your priority. Not your parents or your sister, especially when they take you for granted. Have your own set of rules. If they don't abide by them then they are on their own.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 10:11 AM
4

Would you provide a link to the actual article and comment, please?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 09:13 AM
0

What a fucking shame.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 05:44 AM
2

My last paragraph was really for the group, not you specifically. But apologies if it doesn’t apply to you.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 09:09 PM
0

The guy has written 35,000 articles PLUS made 3 million edits. You haven’t factored in the edits, which could be a lot or a little. But again, if you don’t believe the “a third” stated in the article, then you shouldn’t believe the “35,000 articles” either and then there is no support for this man’s supposed contribution to society. The choice is yours.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:05 AM
1

The caption of the image above says he is the man behind a third of whats on Wikipedia. Are you arguing with that? Plus, it's not just 35,000 articles, it's also 3 million edits.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:28 PM
1

I'm not faulting people for educating themselves, so let's get back to the original issue. The problem I have is that this encyclopedia of the world that people use to educate themselves is mostly written by a some dude. (Not taking away from his efforts but he is just some dude.) Why isn't anyone concerned about that?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:25 PM
2

Dude, look up "men's rights movement" on Wikipedia. It says what the MRM activists fight for, but then it presents a whole bunch of scholarly research and "authorities" disputing what MRM activists say. The entry reads more like "look how stupid these MRM fucks are" instead of "this is what MRM is and why we believe in it." For example, look at the "Issues" section and see the subsection on "Child custody." It consists of one paragraph stating what the MRM activists are fighting for (without sup…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:16 AM
1

If he lives, and we die, his truth becomes written. Exactly.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:56 AM
0

Read the caption of the image. It says "Meet the man behind a third of what's on Wikipedia.". If he wrote one third and and there are 69,999 other editors, each of those other editors on average wrote 0.00009% of Wikipedia. I also assumed that nobody else wrote more than this guy did, or else that other person would be the subject of the article. So doing the math, how is Wikipedia not written by predominantly one man?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:54 AM
0

No, I'm not. Why shouldn't peoole be concerned that one man has written an entire third of the most popular encyclopedia in the US? Especially since the vast majority of people who look to this encyclopedia never bother to verify the sources?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:49 AM
1

Love your username. The reaction I'm getting to a factual statement says it all.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:45 AM
-1

No, but you can start by reading the previous comment and realizing if there are 70k editors then wikipedia is not in any way "predominantly written by one person". Maybe the other 69,999 editors all have only contributed one article each? Sure, ok. Do the math. This person wrote 1/3 of Wikipedia. That means the other 69,999 each on average wrote 0.00009% of Wikipedia. How is Wikipedia not predominantly written by a single person?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:43 AM
1

In my opinion it's nothing to worry about, as long as you don't really rely on a single source. How many people do you know don't call it a day once they read it in Wikipedia?
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:37 AM
-56

It’s not my job to educate the world but I don’t need to “do something about it” in order to voice a concern, do I?
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:30 AM
-29

I mostly do. But I’m in the minority.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:28 AM
48

I think the scarier thought is that the encyclopedia of the world is being written by predominantly one person.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 05:37 AM
0

I was with you until the “if not more...”
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:02 PM
3

Wow. Isn’t this just some high tech panhandling?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:44 PM
98

Why did she lie after this man helped her??
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:07 PM
2

Where is trashy?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:13 PM
5

That's low class harassment.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:05 PM
1

Also, the chair seems to restrict the man’s fairly allotted space by forcing his legs inward. Shouldn’t a fair restriction for any gender simply be a chair with “leg rails” that extent straight forward? The award winning chair actually deprives men of the space to which they are entitled.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:57 AM
1

"funny story" What a disgrace.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:28 AM
0

It's mandatory to you bc it affects you. I understand that. And it's important for people generally to know bc it can prevent men from the protection and justice they deserve and are entitled to. But your chastising attitude toward people like me who are on your side and advocating on your behalf, ffs, isn't really helping. Can we be friends? 🤗 (Only if you want to.)
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:22 PM
0

Have your nipples ever become hard because it got cold? Or for some other non sexual reason? Yes, but I didn't know that your dick works like my nipples. But I forgive you, CaptainMaxelson. Do you need to hug it out? Come here. (Only if you want to, tho.) 🤗
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:14 AM
3

If rape is unwanted vaginal penetration, then a boy getting "raped" is still "rape" because there is a vagina and it is unwanted by one of the people. So it is still rape. That is a really good way of putting it.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:57 PM
0

Its your problem if you did not know. You should have, its basic biology of your own fucking species. Do you know everything about the basic biology of women? I'm your species, too. I'm waiting for your answer. It'll either be a "yes" (ridiculous bc nobody knows everything about anything; you might know a lot but not everything) or a "no" (which would be an admission that you're on my level). So which is it? Are you ridiculous or are you like me, Mackowatosc?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:56 PM
0

She had a different one before, so still guilty. What did I have before and what am I guilty of? If you're insinuating that I looked at men askance for appearing aroused at odd times, then no. I just figured that they were aroused by something that I did not understand. I didn't know they were just thinking about how much mulch to buy and got a stiffy. I thought they were standing in front of the mulch section and thinking about their sweetheart. You can't help thinking about your sweetheart. I …
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:49 PM
1

Thanks, Talbooth! Btw, I've been trying to educate the women around me to get the word out. I hope this situation improves and I'm so glad I found this sub.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:45 PM
1

U/CaptainMaxelson if they said something dumb or held a viewpoint regardless of facts and evidence Well, the second part isn't me, as I've demonstrated already. Let's see if I'm the first part, shall we? I know lots of people with degrees who are stupid and I also know lots of people without degrees who are stupid. Let's hope you're neither because, honestly, if you are so aggressive and critical of someone like me who is willing to learn, then you deserve to be ignored. And I'm talking specific…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:43 PM
13

Woman here. I’ve been married nearly 20 years and I never knew until a year ago that an erection was a physical reaction. I always thought that men couldn’t have erections unless they were actually turned on. I have a post-graduate degree and am a professional. Granted, I’m not in the bio industry but I’m above average in general knowledge, education, and professional experience. And I simply did not know this fact. Perhaps this should be more publicized? I learned a lot by reading and participa…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 12:44 AM
27

Is this a single person bathroom? If so, I can see why she'd be offended. But given that it didn't appear as though there was a lock on the outer door, I believe this is probably a bathroom with a stall area and a sink area. If so, then she shouldn't be offended.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 09:09 PM
1

Nothing. But still fun to watch. I can't believe people say those things to female pastors.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:36 AM
1

Can you post a link to the Instagram post? Sorry, I'm not an Instagram user so can't search for it.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:07 PM
18

Women who take maternity leave have ALWAYS been perceived as lacking commitment to their jobs. This isn't a men versus women thing. It's a parent thing.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:04 PM
2

When she gets her 3 cats, her journey to the Dark Side will be complete... Don't blame the cats.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:39 PM
1

Why didn't he leave the room?
/r/MGTOW16/05/19 11:33 PM
2

What is the practical difference between racism and prejudice?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:25 PM
1

What would happen if you were to identify as female?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:25 PM
2

I think it's a step in the right direction bc at least it has the charges as "rape" explicitly stated in the subtitle. I think the newspapers can't say it's rape until she pleads or is found guilty, even for statutory rape. But obviously, it's rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:35 PM
1

So what happened? Did she get arrested?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 12:34 AM
2

Why don't posters PROVIDE A LINK????
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:51 PM
5

Any man who lets this be done to their child out of fear of contradicting their wife isn't worth the title of father at all. Agree 1000%. I wish I could give this multiple upvotes.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:22 PM
1

Ummm......
/r/MensRights09/04/19 06:49 AM
40

Omg. This is the first time I've seen how circumcisions are done. They are literally strapped down. I'm horrified. Horrified. How could anyone think this is ok?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 05:23 AM
1

Right, but touching girls doesn't get written up in the mainstream press but kissing a woman does?? This world is upside down. Creepy Uncle Joe.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:02 PM
0

Creepy Uncle Joe also likes to hug and kiss little girls at congressional nomination ceremonies. Just search for all the videos on Youtube. It's inexplicable. For this guy, honestly, I don't know why nobody has called him or on that before getting called on kissing a woman. Kissing a woman is what makes news while getting creepy with little girls does not. WTF.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 03:59 PM
3

What if you identify as woman? Try it!
/r/MensRights27/03/19 05:10 AM
1

Who is the audience? Are they presenting this to soldiers?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:47 PM
5

Wow, don't they have to hit rather hard for that effect or are we taking about kung fu master level fighting?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 01:35 AM
6

What is a dead arm?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:56 PM
3

Maybe he's trying to get into some chick's pants!
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:04 AM
1

Think of the least impressive man written about in that book. Are you saying that not a single woman mathemetician existed in the entirety of recorded history who contributed enough to warrant being part of that book? If you're just talking about Ada Lovelace, then I agree with you.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:39 AM
-4

What you say is unfair bc you failed to consider the fact that women's accomplishments have historically been downplayed in science. For example, Rosalind Franklin's contributions to the discovery of the double-helix of the structure of DNA was overlooked (Watson of Watson & Crick fame confirmed this).
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:07 AM
1

Why does he let her be a part of his life? I don't get it...
/r/MensRights24/02/19 03:25 AM
2

I signed the petition. There is an option for non-Australians.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 03:43 PM
3

How were you vindicated?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:00 AM
12

Good for that security guard.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 03:54 AM
3

I've been using duck duck go.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 06:40 AM
3

No idea what you're talking about. I'm talking about the video that is the subject of this post.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:45 AM
11

Looks like the woman assaulted and battered him. Am I missing something here?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 01:04 AM
4

This is a wonderful method of population control.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 05:56 PM
1

See the "Edited to add" portion of my original post and my reply to AnotherDAM.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:34 PM
1

See the "Edited to add" portion of my original post and my reply to AnotherDAM.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:33 PM
4

Please note that I didn't say that ALL women have been automatically disbelieved in the past. But even if I did, do you really have nothing else to say about the rest of my post? Are you purposefully disregarding a reasonable position so that you can continue to be outraged? The lynchings you referenced were the consequence of racism, not sexism. The same accusations from the same probably white woman would not have gotten anywhere near as much traction had they been lobbed at a white man. But t…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 05:26 AM
1

Edited to add: For those who can't be bothered to read past the first two sentences of my original post, fuck off. You're just as bad as the women falsely accusing others of rape. Shame on you for not giving others a chance to explain their entire position. You're doing exactly the same thing that feminists are doing to the innocent men who are falsely accused of rape. I challenge every person who has replied to my original post and/or downvoted me to argue against the last three sentences in my…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 04:48 AM
1

The average man is physically more powerful and stronger than the average woman. So when I see a man being hit by a woman, I think that he isn't defending himself because he has chosen not to. So I feel is not my place to step in since he has chosen to let that situation continue. But when a woman is hit without defending herself, I don't automatically think that is bc she chose not to (since the average woman is physically weaker than the average man). I think it's bc she CAN'T defend herself. …
/r/MensRights22/10/18 05:31 AM
5

Do you think she would be anti-feminist if her own brother weren't accused?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:10 AM
2

Is this where we are now?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:14 AM
2

What is this slash s thing.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:19 PM
1

Let's not use "all" on anyone, men or women.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:55 PM
15

That is definitely rape. You made good points. Sorry that happened to you.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:53 PM
3

Wtf.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:50 PM
0

Again, if you were not already in a war, and an attacker attacked you, then that would be an attack that you defended. The fact that the mode of attack and defense involves firearms doesn't mean the confrontation itself is a legitimate fight. At this point, we've both said what we wanted to say so enjoy the last word. 😊
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:14 AM
0

Technically, there was no war in which the US was a participant until after Pearl Harbor. What the soldiers did was defend the US, but it wasn't a fight. Medals aren't necessarily awarded for "fighting." They are awarded for combat and defense. Many who have never stepped foot on a battlefield have been deservedly awarded medals.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 10:14 PM
2

The boy was getting hurt when the girl started hitting him. By your own standard, the crowd failed.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:52 PM
2

It's not feminism but the onlookers' imbalanced reaction sure is a societal norm.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:28 PM
0

No, when two parties come together with the intent to physically disable the other, it's a fight. Pearl Harbor wasn't a fight in so much as the men on the ground didn't have notice (our government knew, but that's another story). At that time, we had not agreed to enter the war. After Pearl Harbor, all confrontations were a fight.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:26 PM
1

This wasn't a fight. The girl attacked the guy and he fended her off. That's not a fight. He was right to do what he did. She hit him so many times and so viciously that he had to have that level of reaction to make sure she didn't continue attacking him. Again, that wasn't a fight. If the roles were switched, you wouldn't have called it a fight. You'd have said the guy attacked her and she did a marvelous job of defending herself.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:18 AM
1

Bullies never stop on their own.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:12 AM
29

Management is violating the law. You should report them.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 05:05 PM
1

Please tell me you wrote back and said, "Then return all the donations from men for breast cancer research and don't nag the football players to wear stupid ass hot pink outfits on game day."
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:38 PM
4

I totally agree. And I think that seeking an ear of a friend will make that friend less shy when he needs to talk. It would be a chain reaction.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:00 AM
1

If accusations against him include his name already, aren't we doing him a disservice by not using his name when defending him?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:02 AM
-4

I wish there was an up vote and thumbs down button on reddit.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 07:10 AM
1

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I up voted your reply. I grew up in a family of all daughters and while I have nephews, I have never changed their diapers before or spent much time with them as they grew up. It is difficult for me to even imagine the violence of rape paired simultaneously with stimulation. So that's why I asked. Again not saying it doesn't happen or it doesn't routinely happen, just that I myself couldn't and can't imagine it, so that's why I asked.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:44 PM
1

No takers? I see someone downvoted my question.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:26 AM
1

Woman here. Can someone explain how a man can be raped by a woman if he doesn't want to be? I mean not anal-ly. I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm just curious about how a woman could make a man have an erection if he is not turned on by her. I'm not planning on raping any men, btw. Or women. Or anybody.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:08 PM
1

Did she use his true name when inviting him into the car?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 05:02 PM
40

How about my eyes? Do they have a choice?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:43 AM
14

People need space, not control.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:10 AM
8

I'm sad that we need a men's day and a women's day.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:56 PM
1

Encouraging passive aggressiveness.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:46 PM
2

It's not fair to assume that the mom is the better caretaker.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 01:34 PM
116

Is that a room for breastfeeding, though?
/r/MensRights17/07/18 02:27 AM
-1

But why is it more often a man who thinks that he is the one from whom the original speaker should learn?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter