TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NonsensicalOrange Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by NonsensicalOrange on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Did they have SuperMario64 40 years ago? I think not! On a serious note, the computer revolution has done so much for us, information saves and improves peoples lives on a daily basis, we can all access this stuff from our pockets. Even if we weren't more productive now (which we are)[quantity], we have better stuff now [quality] thanks to all the innovations. You can obviously look back in history, from the cavemen to the peasants and see we have improved so much, well that is still happening a…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/18 11:21 PM
3

Yeah, but every white european king was a white man. Also god and jesus were white men, they invented child-cancer, female-periods, and more men, then gave all the men rape-sticks. Check and mate! Hisssssssssssssss/s
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/18 11:14 PM
4

Can you link to a couple of the toxic statements he made? It's a fact that there are biological and sociological differences in men and women, that will obviously reflect itself in a work-place as well, which parts did you find excessively misogynistic? The memo was far from perfect, but I read half of it and didn't see anything terrible there.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:50 PM
5

There are plenty of nicegirls. We often teach that personality and kindness is what matters and tell young'uns that they are very special and nice, when their expectations aren't met they get upset and confused, "but i'm so nice and beautiful on the inside, why aren't i loved?" Also some girls think they are really hot and get into the same dilemma.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:26 AM
2

Women don't have the ability to spot perverts or assholes. Women, like men, have the ability to feel uncomfortable around people who look or act in an awkward or unpleasant manner, and might refer to those people as creeps. What you are talking about are appearances/impressions. This has little to do with the kind of person you are, it's about the kind of person you seem to be. If a girl sees someone who is shy and awkward, they can be hard to talk to, it can make the girl feel uncomfortable, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 04:26 PM
2

Your comment is hard to understand, could you fix your second and third line (makes -> males).
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:56 PM
1

Freedom of speech is the right to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation Freedom of speech is not necessarily about the government, mainstream use of the phrase is more broad/vague. People value the right to speak their mind in any context, but will often oppose it when it is convenient. TRP'ers probably feel like the person is being unfairly witch-hunted by political opponents over opinions he shared in private/anonymity. They don't want certain 'opinions' to…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:22 AM
11

But the fact is, that purpose of any species is to procreate and multiply. So you shouldn't demonize people who are just doing what comes natural to them. People should be able to have kids if they want to. Who is demonizing having children? You mean the overpopulation thing i mentioned? This discussion is very 'inconsistent' and 'wishy washy'. Example; You said switching genders was wrong because we need people to have children; i said people we don't need to (and shouldn't) force people to pro…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 05:04 PM
34

I don't see how that's relevant... People know how mating works. Yes, even the dumbest SJWs. Having a small percentage of bisexuals, gays, or transgenders will not lead to the end of the human race, nor will teaching kids to be open-minded towards it (heck, not even if they horribly pressured kids into it). First world countries are seeing low birth rates, but much of the world is overpopulated and it is only getting worse. If you want more people, instead of pressuring or forcing people into li…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 02:53 PM
1

Are you trolling? Maybe they are not the penultimate fascist but the similarities and the irony is glaringly obvious. This was a discussion about whether they fit the definition of a fascist, if they aren't a fascist then admit you were wrong and stop throwing more shit. "The similarities are glaringly obvious", between immature protesters who blocked a sidewalk while protesting and a brutal nationalist dictatorship? What don't you understand? i see more demonization of white people than ever be…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 09:35 PM
1

We've been over this... Even if you think they are a movement and are suppressing their opposition, you're still missing the core part about them being nationalists in support of a dictatorship. That's like defining racists as 'people' who 'hate other races', therefore you are racist because you are 'a person' which is one of the requirements. Definitions don't work like that. If they aren't supporting nationalism and/or an autocratic government, then it doesn't make any sense. The definition is…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 07:38 PM
1

Care to elaborate? Because that makes no sense. Are they a movement or regime? Not really. Are they espousing nationalism and racism? Nope. Are they trying to build an autocratic government? Nope. Are they suppressing opposition? No, they are blocking people on the sidewalk. You need 4/4 for the label to apply, you have 0/4. Even if you think they are a movement and are suppressing their opposition, you're still core part about them being nationalists in support of a dictatorship.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 12:10 PM
5

nothing to do with equality. they wanna be treated equal then let em. Doesn't seem like you even tried. He said "don't escalate with violence", not "don't hit a woman".
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/17 01:51 AM
5

Exactly, they use autism as an insult, have you considered how degrading that is to people with autism? Here you have someone who hasn't ridiculed autism, or tourettes, or any other disorder. S/he made a joke reference about leg-straps.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:23 PM
5

We said it seems like she was joking. That's wouldn't be a false assumption, it would be satire.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:09 PM
-2

Yes. Are you familiar with many men undergoing therapy for manspreading?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:06 PM
2

It was clearly a joke, don't be petty about it. She's being ignorant Meaning? Ignorance isn't inherently wrong. Most people don't know what those leg-straps are used for.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:55 PM
-5

She isn't making fun of someone personally and she isn't mocking the fact they have tourettes. She took a picture of legs strapped together then added some silly observational humour. People frequently ridicule others in the most degrading and personal ways online, reddit calls peoples autistic all the time. I'm sure people who use leg-belts can see the funny side of this joke, there is little reason to take this personally, but if they don't like it that's also okay.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:22 PM
3

The meaning is known by all, but getting someone annoyed isn't insulting, calling someone triggered is just stupid. Most of the time they aren't even annoyed, explain why the guy in the post is supposedly upset? He criticized them, therefore he is butthurt? That's not how anything works. I'm mostly made of water, i'm not particularly dense.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 06:36 PM
5

Hairy women are back in style. I can't see anything particularly beardy about that guys neck, he's got a beard that runs along his chin but that's where it's supposed to be. It's a pretty stupid insult... Someone says something you don't like on reddit, clearly they don't shave stylishly.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:40 PM
3

Something doesn't need to be caused by women for men's rights to bring it up. Rape isn't considered a women's issue because men do it more often, it's a women's issue because it's believe more women are raped than men. More men suffer from assault, murder, and suicide making it a men's rights issue, it's a valid complaint for why men have difficulties. If you thought I was blaming women, that wasn't intended, we all know women aren't the primary perpetrators. There is still prejudice involved, t…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:21 PM
2

The way it's used now a days is synonymous with butt hurt. It's been formed and stretched and teased to the point of ineffectuality. Which is the problem, everybody is saying it in the most irrelevant and stupid ways possible, if anybody they don't like argues something they respond with "hah, this guy's so triggered". It's incredibly immature. Even when it makes sense, it's pretty much just people saying, "Omg, I got a reaction out of this guy, what a retard, only retards get upset." Let's try …
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:03 PM
5

Why is it an insult? It's such a random thing to stereotype. "Look at that hairyleg powderface, I bet she reeks of insecurities and spams Tumblr with stupid complaints about men."
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:52 PM
2

It's a shame that Manists (ok, I'll embrace the term) position themselves that way. Feminists have this complaint. The problem is, you're doing something similar, malists said men are more likely to die working and you said dismissed the complaint as ridiculous, then you blamed meninists for not listening. The issue is far more nuanced. Masculists also say feminists do exactly the same thing, not listening and misrepresenting the issues. Menists believe feminists villify menrightists, even sayin…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:40 PM
3

Gotcha, you've got the better stomach for policing language, makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:23 PM
2

Men also want to look desirable and they do put in a lot of thought and effort, women don't revolve exclusively around their looks, both men and women try to use their looks (among other things) to attract a partner. Make-up is temporary, men will see their dates without it, beards are much more long-term... Would you feel differently if he said women should shave their legs before men should consider dating them? The point was that visual prerequisites can go both ways, insisting someone else c…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:15 PM
2

Possibly because they're not aimed at controversy or ridicule. I don't remember seeing twitters get blurred though, people often link to specific twitter names but that might have more to do with them being public figures.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:59 PM
9

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh Don't think any comments here came close to saying that comment oppressed them. Some folks assumed women or feminists would get upset if it was reversed, ergo a double standard, dramatic fun for the whole political family.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:52 PM
39

Yeah, stop using triggered as an insult, thanks. All you're saying is someone reacted adversely. Haha, what an idiot, he disagreed, lol, triggerd, laugh at him, moron, reactions, hah, sooo trggrd! Call him a neckbeard too for extra classiness. Any other memes you want to throw in?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:40 PM
7

Arguments like more men die in industrial accidents - that's because more men are employed in industry jobs. Isn't the same true for any gender issue, no matter what the issue is there will be an underlying cause. There is still a gender discrepancy with men taking on riskier jobs and suffering for it, then it is argued that men are suffering from their own problems and the cause for the job differences can be blamed on gender roles. That's how the whole gender political war works, then both sid…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter