TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noodle36 Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by Noodle36 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
50

No, the Brown Shirts were the Nazi response to the fact that in the '30s, socialist thugs would break up the political meetings of right-wing and moderate political parties. In other words, SJWs are how you get Nazis. ...sensing any parallels to today?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:42 AM
2

People have been trying to set up men's spaces at universities with all the right paperwork, policy statements, and infrastructure for years. It doesn't matter how careful and correct they are, it doesn't inspire any change or reflection, the school just changes the rules to ban them.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:50 PM
2

The Islamic Republic of Iran is most definitely not a democracy. It has a democratically elected parliament and preident, but they're secondary to the Supreme Council of Islamic clerics, and everything is subordinate to Ayatollah Khamenei. The clerics decide who can run in the elections, and what laws they're allowed to pass. You could also make an argument that post-2008 the IRGC and militias are at least as powerful as the clerics themselves, but it is most definitely a theocracy before it's a…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:04 AM
5

Why hasn't he done anything on the topic during his years in the Senate while the campus kangaroo courts debacle has been unfolding? Well mostly because he hasn't done anything at all, aside from rename a post office in Vermont.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:43 AM
3

It's fucking hilarious listening to women talk about why they had a problem with that movie. You can feel them groping around the edges of the reality - that men are considered less precious than women and it's more okay to hurt them in reality than it is to hurt women even in fiction - but they don't quite get there.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:37 AM
6

But it is, Bill, it very clearly is.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:34 AM
2

Can you link it? Edit: dw, found it lower down
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:14 AM
2

Much like the presidential college, it's an antiquated system designed for preindustrial societies. The Democratic presidential nominee is selected at the Democratic National Convention by a ballot of 4,764 delegates. 4,051 of those delegates are selected by caucuses or primaries in the various states, usually proportionally allocated based on how that state voted. Those delegates are all required to vote for the candidate they've been selected to vote for - IN THE FIRST ROUND OF VOTING. In the …
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:41 PM
4

I suspect they're more willing to piss off 55% of primary voters than to risk losing the support of every major Democratic donor, every Fortune 500 CEO, and the entire finance industry. We'll see in July.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:39 PM
10

Don't forget about the superdelegates. 350-odd are already for Clinton, 13 for Bernie, 350 undecided. If the remaining 350ish break evenly (and they could easily break heavily her way), she'll have 525, meaning she only needs 1858 more to win - which is 45% of the delegates being voted on. In other words Sanders could decisively win the popular vote and lose the nomination. Which is going to lead to a lot of extremely angry and disillusioned Democrats.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:39 PM
2

Honestly if you actually read The Feminine Mystique and other seminal feminist texts from the '60s and '70s, it pretty quickly becomes clear that even when feminism was focused on legitimate grievances, it was still couched in a perspective that didn't see men as fully human or worthy of consideration as complex individuals rather than an amorphous mass of oppressors.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:21 PM
2

Infanticide: the crime of murdering an infant, typically committed by a woman.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:49 PM
22

It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you. There are still people in prison over the '80s Satanic ritual abuse panic, in which interviewing & prosecutorial techniques were used that resulted in the vast majority of children saying they'd experienced sexual abuse by whoever the prosecutors wanted. In this case even if the aunt doesn't convince the authorities, she's flinging mud that clings too easily. I can see saying "don't babysit, too risky" being a little paranoid (I still say don't…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 10:33 PM
3

My point was that this is not even a feature of juvenile ideas of justice. Punishing entire classes of people for their collective sins is something that, in modern society, you'll only see in ideologies associated with Marxism. It's not the result of ignorance, it's a sophisticated political creation designed to harm.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 06:46 AM
5

I did not say that children's ideas of justice are mature and well thought-out. I said that they understand that the culprit is responsible and should bear any punishment, not a different individual who shares traits with the culprit.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:39 AM
4

When's the last time you came across a child that believed it's justice to punish someone roughly similar to the actual culprit? Kids may not have a great grasp of evidence and causality but they quickly develop a very good understanding of the unfairness of punishing someone for someone else's deeds. This kind of stupid takes years of careful training and education.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:12 AM
107

So what if she has a gun? Let her shoot me? If a crazy chick I slept with is trying to stab me...should I let her? I mean she literally just has to smack you in the head with a dinner plate. The idea that women can't harm men is basically a polite fiction to cover up the root societal values that consider men unworthy of compassion.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:51 PM
17

More like /r/TumblrInAction was always a partial recognition of what was actually a powerful current within academia. Tumblrinas are just kids who happily swallowed the feminist/critical race theory/historical revisionist/postcolonial studies brand of motivated thinking, and followed it to its inevitable conclusion that actually a totalitarian state run by the Right People is the solution to all the world's problems. They make such good material for mockery because they aren't yet experienced en…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 11:33 AM
7

Lol that teary sotto voce "it's not a democracy..." @ 3:35. "How can it be a democracy when the state is permitting people to say things I don't want them to say?"
/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:30 AM
7

This is why Rich Piana is so well known for his tennis skills. Have you ever seen a tennis player? I mean if you're going to be deliberately dense and pretend that's why they were asking, then asking a female player to twirl to show off her glutes is much more relevant to the actual sport.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:35 PM
44

Here's my quick rundown of gendered slurs for men in 2015. Dudebro: physically attractive or "average" man who is socially well adjusted. Successfully conforms to gendered social cues such as fashion and is unashamed of his masculinity in a way that causes feminists to suspect him of ideological impurity. This is extended to an assumed tolerance of/engagement in sex crimes. Creep/creeper: physically unattractive man who responds poorly to social cues. (These tend to be along the lines that he sh…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:05 AM
2

The title is (wilfully) incorrect because it implies working women as a population disproportionately die as a result of murder when compared to working men as a population. An accurate (but still misleading) title would be "women who die in the workplace disproportionately die from murder".
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:21 AM
8

Lol @ your downvotes. It's amazing how many people are convinced any linking of marijuana to negative consequences is a lie by default. Cannabis-induced psychosis is a well-established medical phenomenon that anyone working in acute psychiatric care sees regularly. Doubters can Google it on Scholar if they wish.
/r/PussyPass27/06/15 11:44 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:54 PM
18

The irony is that Foucault has become the eternal favourite of SJWs who divide the world entirely into the supposedly omnipotent oppressor and the powerless oppressed, when he actually described power as a discourse, asserting that even in the most imbalanced situation, the exercise of power acts on and changes the subject as well as the object. Feminists use Foucault like a caveman beating someone to death with a Stradivarius.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:32 PM
23

Given that she not only wrote and backed this work of utter fantasy but tried to head off early doubters by trying to invoke Rolling Stone's "fact checkers" who clearly did not exist, she should be put into the same category as Stephen Glass, Jayson Blair and Janet Cooke and never, ever work again. But I wouldn't count on it. A journalist who lies for convenience or glory and gets caught is drummed out of the industry, but a journalist who lies for a political agenda shared by many editors and T…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:43 PM
1

Lemme just send that out on the wires as a flash BREAKING: REALITY TV VIEWERS DUMB
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/15 08:01 PM
32

Whoever's filming is trying to do it relatively discreetly so they don't get attacked themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/15 08:42 PM
3

Women literally have no power in society whatsoever.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:05 PM
1

This is fine.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:22 AM
2

I'm also Australian. Enclosed parks with signs saying no unaccompanied adults are definitely around, took my daughter to one just the other day. Also saw them in New York a few months ago and Tokyo last year.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:19 PM
1

I'm no fan of XX Factor at Slate, but people need to read Rosin's original article. The link in this post totally mischaracterises her article in bad faith. The original isn't great, but it's not the exaggerated act of villainy and minimisation you're reading about here.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:10 PM
9

She's correct in saying "mild autism" would previously have been called Aspergers. Aspergers as a separate diagnosis was folded into autistic spectrum disorder with the release of the DSM-5 last year. EDIT: corrected keyboard derp
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:45 PM
25

It's an excellent point about just how deeply male disposability reaches into the justice system. With a real male victim in front of them, directly harmed by a woman's criminal act, judges are more concerned about the potential indirect harm to an abstract female victim.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:04 PM
4

So this is the new standard for Reddit fedora-tier discourse? Not only provide peer reviewed citations, but somehow "demonstrate" the credibility of those citations without poor ZimbaZumba having to read them to justify his incredulity?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:30 PM
5

...so if you're arguing in good faith, why didn't you read the studies and point out design flaws, rather than firing off ad hominems in the dark?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:13 PM
7

... is that something that comes up a lot for you?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:18 PM
10

Public health stats are very open and easy to research, why not just verify her claims yourself? Then if you can come back with links proving this person has lied or is incorrect you'll have cracked the case wide open.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 09:16 AM
3

Yeah exactly. It's nuts and it irritates me too, but that's what you get for submitting your society to the whims of the lawyers' cartel.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:18 PM
4

In Australia, and I believe in the UK and probably in the U.S., journalists are required to qualify allegations which are the subject of court proceedings. This case is sub judice, therefore saying she did something as opposed to allegedly did it is contempt of court. You can say "police accuse her of x" or "she allegedly x" but you can't say "she DID x".
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:08 PM
4

Seeing clumsy gold diggers and concluding they're all obvious is like seeing through a shitty street magician's sleight of hand tricks and concluding that because you can't see any wires, David Copperfield is an actual wizard.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 09:53 AM
4

Not wrong. EVIL. A misogynist, literally a person who hates women. A television writer asked about the creative purpose of the nudity in her show? He hates women.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 02:08 PM
3

An (Australian) army mate of mine went through this. He was on deployment, wife started fucking around because he wasn't "supporting her emotionally" (stupid piece of shit was just providing for her and her family while defending her nation, right?). He fucks his whole career up by cutting his deployment short to rush home and fix things, she decides she wants a divorce, denies him access to the kids and moves her bed buddy into his house. Now, this is basically the perfect guy. Good looking, in…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 04:59 PM
1

Between 2008 and 2010 there were 116 female and 75 male victims of domestic homicide in Australia. That's 61% to 39%. (Table 10 in the link below.) In the broader pool of murder victims, the roles are reversed, with 68% of victims male and 32% female, which is consistent throughout all Australian (and international) data. (Figure 12 in the link) By offender, however, 88% were men and 12% women. (Figure 17) http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/mr/21/mr21.pdf
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:29 PM
5

An apologist is someone who makes arguments in defence of something controversial. A male apologist would be someone who defends men.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter