TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

North_Cry3591 Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by North_Cry3591 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

maybe for you because you believe in acceptance by society. Not even sure what logic you've used to get there. Break that chain and you can be fulfilled by anything, You certainly can't be fulfilled by anything.(unless you wanna argue for relativism which doesn't seem like the case to me).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 07:37 PM
2

you can spend your whole life reading comic books an you will feel fulfilled. No you can't. Fulfillment and pleasure are completely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:00 PM
4

that is the patriarchical culture which is saying men to follow the path written to them. it is oppressing to both men and women It has nothing to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 03:16 PM
5

Ah yes, that makes perfect sense. You seem to love extrapolating nonsense out of nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 10:22 AM
2

Whether 6% is negligible and whether there is an margin of error in the data are two separate issues. Most social data or studies are not very reliable and rarely replicatable, but we talk about them all the time anyways. Yes, I completely agree with this. However, a study of this sort will definitely have a significant error margin (I've seen some other studies from Pew which do have this information available so I'll have a look at it later). Although in this case, it's hard to determine the t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 06:25 PM
5

supermodels are the "ideal" for men Yeah, no. 6' skinny white girls aren't the ideal for the majority of men. Men's criteria is much more varied than women's. 99% of women actually end up marrying their general looksmatch That doesn't say anything about attraction though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:26 PM
3

By the same logic, I could say the same thing about you? You also used your personal experience (which arguably is far less than mine when it comes to clubs and bar) to support your thesis. Also nice of you conveniently ignoring the article I mentioned that shows that online dating is the most common way of finding partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:24 PM
3

Based on what? The problem here is that you're neglecting error analysis. To see and verify whether the 6% is statistically relevant we need to see (looking at things like sample size and other factors) what is the error margin of the data in question. Your example relies on the idea that the data in the study has absolute certainty (which cannot be the case).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:22 PM
1

I think you're replying to the wrong person.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:17 PM
1

What's the selection bias in the study? Or are you talking about me working in a club commenting on behavior of people in clubs?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:15 PM
1

It's negligible, in fact although I haven't checked this properly, it is probably statistically insignificant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:07 PM
1

Yes, I understand that. What I meant is that the minimum?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:06 PM
2

Approaches rarely happen and they're nearly exclusively for casual sex Yeah, then we live in different universes. I worked in a bar/club for 3 years and I saw men approaching women all the fucking time (with the vast majority of them being rejected). Also this https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-way-u-s-couples-meet/ Meeting through friends is no longer the most common way to meet partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:02 PM
3

That's fine, but the study doesn't support (nor deny) your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:49 PM
7

Yep, that's despite want sex and relationships slightly more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:45 PM
3

Have you even bothered to look at the study? In the 18-39 bracket the difference between men and women is negligible. Yes, people know that 55 years old women aren't getting dicked down by Chads.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:43 PM
4

In the 18-39 bracket it's very similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:40 PM
0

Not sure where you live, but in any big city women get approached all the time in a bar or club setting (and yes not just for casual sex). Also the most common way of finding partners is online (where men lead and initiate the majority of interactions).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:30 PM
1

What do you mean by tall enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:26 PM
1

So your cute nerdy shy guy can be short (e.g. Below 5'4'')?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:23 PM
8

Your math is fundamentally flawed. How did you conclude that 30% of women found their partners online? The statistics only show the gender ratio at any given time on a single app. That doesn't support your premise at all. But to your question, most women don't need to think about it. Men just approach them (online being first, bars and clubs second).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:20 PM
1

Women are wanting relationships less anyway, I mean that will make it even worse. Because most men don't have the same access to sex that most women have. Most women can fuck as much they want, but men can't. This will inevitably create a scenario where the majority of guys wouldn't want to be with women who have far more past partners than them. I think less people than you think will care. Definitely not. Most men value having low partner count (I mean if you pick 100 men at random, most will …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:12 PM
35

Lol, yes. Or when you're in an argument with a woman: I agree with you => bde. I disagree with you => sde.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:03 PM
1

I feel that height only becomes an advantage past a certain point (like 6’3 and up). Not really, every inch above average increases your dating pool. That’s mainly because really tall dudes are rare Short guys below 5'4'' are also rare but I don't seem women thirsting for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:01 PM
1

Lanky is hott. Yes, that seems to depend a lot ofln a guys height for women though. Short and skinny = no thank you, tall and skinny = omg you look like a rockstar.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:59 PM
1

Most men have absolutely no idea how much sex women are actually having. Yep, women in their 20s can fuck whoever they want (but of course they mostly fuck the usual type). Most men can't do that and so they have this disillusioned idea that it must be the same for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:57 PM
3

By being a woman lol. Women can fuck (and do) pretty much whoever they want in their 20s. Only a minority of men can do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:53 PM
1

It wouldnt change the way I live my life It definitely would change how most women live their life. There is no doubt in my mind that there options for marriage would be less. Now you can say that you wouldn't want to be a guy that cares anyway, but that only works on an individual level. At the population level, this will definitely have a huge impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:52 PM
1

Men would finally realise how it's only a minority of men fucking most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:48 PM
1

Other than starving I don't know how that guy is "nerdy". This guy could easily look like, with clothes on, the classical tall and lanky type that so many seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:46 PM
1

They were pointing out you were using a word incorrectly. Yes, I'm aware. I disagree that's the case. Then don't engage? I only replied to their comment because I just wanted to point out that their points were mistaken (if you don't know Reddit is public forum not a one-on-one chat app) , not to actually argue with them. Because just looking at their comment tells me that further conversation is going to be useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:42 PM
1

I’ve seen 5’4 guys get women back in High school Yep, high school is a completely different game. Once you turn 18/19 things change a lot. Where I live there are lot of ethnic minorities (mostly Asians) and it's very common to see short guys. And guess what? The short ethic guys do much worse than the tall ethnic guys. I think girls are looking for pretty chill guys that are fun to be around, they want to be comfortable in your presence They are, I'm not disagreeing with that. But that only come…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:38 PM
16

I must have done this countless times with women I know well and also acquaintances and physically most women always mention some version of "tall, toned/built and classically handsome" (the "tall" never fails to appear).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:34 PM
6

Did you read even the comment? Yes, they care about the war. They don't give a shit that *men are being forced to join the military but women aren't. *
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 10:39 AM
1

There is data on the height (you can probably find this easily). As far I can recall there was a study showing that more than 65% of women would discard men who are 5'7'' or below, the number of for 5'10' was between was around 40-30% (and smaller for taller men with a minimum around 6'2''). Assuming all other things being equal, sure. But you dont have to let them be equal. You can recognize your own weaknesses and compensate by developing your strengths. You can always, but the point is that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:31 AM
1

Except this isn't the case. A 5'7'' guy will do significantly worse than a 5'11'' despite them being both within 1 std from the mean. Not just that being tall will have a very positive outcome on your dating pool. I just mentioned height because it's the most concrete example (and one of the most influential) , but there are plenty of other factors that are either outside of your control (e.g. Ethnicity, baldness) or very hard to achieve (social status, being rich, etc...).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:20 AM
1

Lol, how's a normally distributed trait like height an exception? There are countless other things that I haven't even mentioned. Sorry, but your entire argument is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:03 AM
1

Bro you literally wrote that this sub wouldn't exist if men had some "real world experience". Just the height thing alone dictates that it would.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:51 AM
1

Yeah, but it's not something you can do or not do. How does that dismiss my argument? The key is to compensate by improving what you can. Sure, but I feel like your post completely ignores that there are things outside of your control that will have a huge impact on your dating life. That it's not true that college gives you an unrealistic view of dating because things like height will always be very relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:38 AM
1

Height is seen as a masculine trait. That's why those guys are still seen as attractive by many women. Because they still possess masculine traits in the eyes of women. Also you said that people's problem will go away when they grow up, which is just false (e.g. Can't change your height).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:31 AM
2

What's with the focus around here on extremely short men? Do I have to edit that into the OP? Is that what's really going on here, a sub for men below 1 standard deviation in the height department? Even if he was like 5'6'', he would get rejected by the overwhelming majority of women on his height alone. You argued that you don't need to be masculine for getting laid. The height example is to convey that you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:23 AM
5

Yes, he's 5'10''. A guy like him would still get rejected plenty on dating apps. If he was 5'3'' most women ignore him regardless (obviously assuming he wasn't famous).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:08 AM
2

It's because most women complain about the guy letting them pay even if they offered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:06 AM
2

How does a cute shy nerdy boy look like? Are we talking Hollywood nerdy (e.g. Tall, toned, classically handsome with glasses) or real nerdy (e.g. short, chubby and messy hair)?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:05 AM
1

It does make me wonder why people think women just aren’t willing to date men who make less because they’re hypergamous, often times those men are too prideful to let you cover the bill to do enjoyable activities at a higher price How did you go from "one single experience" to "often times"? You've got one data point, you can't conclusions based on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:01 AM
7

You can say what you want, but I just know that any conversation with someone like you is going to be fiddled with bad faith arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:55 AM
7

When they talk about women, they mean this: https://images.app.goo.gl/VMcfWMh8TddopzzB8 What exactly is special about that woman? They think being a woman would be easier and solve all of their problems. They attribute all of thei problems and issues with being male. Women certainly have it easier in many aspects in life, dating is one of them. Now you can disagree, but your dismissivness is telling that you're going to do the usual gaslighting of 99% of women in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:49 AM
11

I really can't comprehend a world in which some men are just so completely blind to the plight of women. Even the stuff going on in Iran right now, millions and millions of women are still fighting for basic rights to exist in public spaces. What about the men in Ukraine? Where are all the women protesting for women to also be forced to join the military? Our media has given massive coverage and sympathy for women over a single woman killed in Iran, but thousands of men (and not women) in Ukrain…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:47 AM
8

. I said this in another comment, but Timothee Chalamet and Harry Styles types absolutely smash these days. Because they're tall, white and classically handsome. They're still perceived to be masculine because of that. Not because they're emotionally intelligent or funny.Most women would pass on 5'3'' Timothee Chalamet type irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:43 AM
2

I think this might have the effect of women using dating apps less because nowadays most women are looking for Chad and Tyrones and won't settle for less (at least when they're young).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:39 AM
9

Ironically, taller women are rarely height queens Most tall women still want taller guys. They aren't height queens because there aren't many guys over 6'8''.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:37 AM
0

I somewhat disagree with this. A lot of time I feel like those interactions you're talking about are very superficial and hardly telling of the quality of relationship of the people involved. Men might not complement each other as often, but in my experience they certainly don't bitch about others behind their back as much as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:35 AM
6

Many women don't want promiscuous men either and find it gross, That's just nonsense. Never in my life I've met or seen a woman caring about that. The only exception I can think of is religious women (and even then I think the majority of religious women in the West wouldn't care).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:32 AM
1

Being tall, classically handsome and/or rich makes you a Chad. None of those things are obtained by your advice. A 5'4'' guy isn't suddenly going to become a Chad and will have most likely a miserable time with getting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:30 AM
1

Honestly yeah focusing on something else other than women is the best thing I can advise. There are other parts of your life that are enjoyable. Yes, romance and sex are a big thing for most people but there aren't everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:27 AM
4

My experience has been quite different. "Tall" is perhaps the most common adjective women seem to use to describe what they want in a guy. I also think people seriously undermine the importance of online dating. It's the most common way of finding partners and it will only get more pervasive. I hope young men realise that it's not worth breaking your legs and endangerijg your life because most women don't find you attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:20 AM
9

Leg lengthening surgery will essentially be like breast surgery for men in the near future. No this simply won't be the case (at least not for decades to come). The procedure is life threatening and permanently damages your legs. It takes nearly 2 years to recover. Breast surgery is a piece of cake in comparison. I agree that it will definitely become more common given the current dating trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 12:49 AM
8

I don't think guys mind paying for dates, what's frustrating is trying to enforce gender roles only when it's beneficial for yourself. I don't really get quite why some women don't realise the inherent hypocrisy in this attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 12:37 AM
10

Was talking to a guy who is 6ft and he was like yeah I’m not very tall - we (not me) are literally creating body dysmorphia in men, because in what world is 6ft not tall? That's inevitable though. Women are ruthless when it comes to height requirements and are very outspoken about it. In today's age, a man learns very quickly that his height will have a huge impact on his dating life. Especially nowadays with social media, young kids quickly internalise this. This isn't going to change, but it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 12:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter