TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NosemaCeranae Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by NosemaCeranae on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Already edited my comment. But how could I knew she was a woman? It definitely read like they were admitting to preying on children...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 02:34 PM
3

Woah. You should have been more clear there. The thread is about older men preying on kids, so yes it read like you were admitting to preying on kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 02:33 PM
0

Yes it can be gross and creepy which is partly why my career as a babysitter was very short!!! Jesus Christ you're disgusting. Edit: OP clarified she was being preyed on, not doing the preying-on. Miscommunication.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 02:26 PM
10

I've noticed more day to day variation for any given woman than between women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 02:00 PM
2

Did you really just copy paste a part of another comment from this thread?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/16 02:06 PM
-6

How inclusive of you to talk to "blacks". Holy shit.
/r/askTRP07/06/16 01:10 AM
2

To be fair there are legally declared non-human persons across the globe, like dolphins in India.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 06:40 PM
1

if the relationship goes south, all she has to do is claim abuse That's not how that works. She'd actually have to show evidence of abuse.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 04:36 AM
11

You're right. Voting conservative is childishly selfish and self centered. Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 02:01 AM
10

vote selfishly Yep because opposing same sex marriage is selfless.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:57 AM
12

If half the sentient, mature, conscientious population predictably leans liberal, that should tell you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:25 AM
3

Neither of those things are suggestive of a decline in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 03:39 AM
2

You say with no evidence based argument. The idea that unrestricted female sexuality might have a negative impact on society is laughable at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 02:30 AM
6

Society has almost unilaterally improved since the 1960s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 01:42 AM
1

I think you're still misunderstanding what the original article said. Sure, it suggests that in mice (not humans) they are phenotypically more like dad. Not genotypically.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:23 PM
1

Ironic you think I destroyed my credibility by pointing out unscientific discussion disguised as science.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:21 PM
1

'Mother nature' doesn't believe shit. Mother nature has no morals, and this isn't a moralistic problem. Over-expression of paternal genes is intersting, but no for the reasons you stated. There's no reason to believe it would 'accelerate evolution', that I can see.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:11 PM
1

Even if male genes weren't passed on more frequently...even though major publications are reporting that they ARE.... I'm not even going to get into the rest of your sloppy argument, but here's some basic genetics. The article did NOT report thst male genes are being passed on more. They reported that paternal genes are being expressed more, meaning the child's phenotype is more likely to be more like the father's, but the child's genotype is still only 50% father 50% mother.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 01:55 PM
10

her: "You're too old for me" you: "gay" You're fucking kidding yourself thinking any woman wouldn't immediately pass you off as a man-child if you gave this response.
/r/askTRP22/01/15 01:26 AM
-1

And If I strike it rich, I will move to a new city/country in a heartbeat so no old lays try to steal my money with false claims What? In no reality would any 'old lay' be able to claim any of your wealth.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/15 12:51 AM
1

Define ad hominem for me as concisely as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 09:04 PM
0

Like I said, point to where I tried to refute his argument and I'll admit it was ad hominem. But I didn't, so it wasn't. Seriously, do you have the reading comprehension of a fucking 12 year old?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 10:01 PM
1

Read the definition of ad hominem. It requires having to try to refute the person's argument, which I didn't. So before you try to condescend, study and memorize the content of your own link.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:59 PM
1

This is some bad comedy. I don't care about his arguments. They could very well be valid. I'm not reading them. My goal was to bring his character to light, not to refute his argument. Which I clearly never tried ti do. No where. Never did i say his arguments were wrong. Holy fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:52 PM
2

What. By definition, ad hominem is attacking character in an effort to refute someone's argument. Which I didn't do. This really isn't that hard to understand. You rp have a much harder time grasping this than I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:49 PM
0

Stalking him would be hunting down posts etc. Which I don't do. You have a serious issue with understanding vocabulary. What a shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:46 PM
1

No I didn't. I recounted his shittiness and clearly stated it was not to discredit his arguments in this thread. But only because I think it's morally correct that people are aware of his shittiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:45 PM
0

I didn't do it. So, you're still wrong in insisting it was ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:37 PM
0

That makes no sense at all. I am subscribed to this sub and saw I have him tagged (res), too remind myself to bring his shittiness to light if I happen across his post. So you're just getting more wrong. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:34 PM
0

Lol what. Right, when you can't actually provide evidence of what you're asserting, just insist. That'll get you far. I repeat, clearly you don't know what ad hominem is. That's ok, it's ok to admit you're wrong, even if it bruises your fragile little ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:24 PM
1

Read the Fucking definition. short for argumentum ad hominem, means responding to arguments by attacking a person's character, rather than to the content of their arguments This is not what I did. I'm not responding to his argument. I'm merely reminding people that he's a piece of shit. And as for my reply to you, you didn't make an argument I was responding to. I was just pointing out the irony of you saying that "I didn't deserve serious convo". Sure that's not a comment on my character at all…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:59 PM
-1

You also don't know what an ad hominem is. I never made a evaluative statement about his arguments. It can't be ad hominem, by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:55 PM
6

Wow, joking about marital rape, so edgy, so funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:37 PM
1

Says the guy supporting someone advocating rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:36 PM
2

Correct. Because I think people should be Aware that he holds this belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:11 PM
2

But I never said his arguments weren't valid. So, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:06 PM
1

And you're equally morally bereft.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 07:54 PM
1

It's not ad hominem to point out morally twisted beliefs. I'm not trying to discredit his position. He did that just fine himself by expressing inarguably immoral beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 07:45 PM
2

Yeah. Must really suck to have such a sad life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 07:21 PM
11

Just a reminder that /u/sh1v advocates mandatory rape of wives. "I'd take it a step further and make it not only legal, but mandatory. It seems to me that most women would benefit from a good hard raping or three, just to establish in their minds who the dominant party is."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 07:03 PM
12

Classic response of a boy with no leg to stand on in an argument they've no business in.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 02:33 AM
11

I'm in college in America. Women on college campuses get drunk and have sex. Sometimes they regret it. There's zero reason to believe women ever report a rape because they regretted sex. Try stepping into the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 11:42 PM
6

Much like what occurs in college campuses. ... Sure it does
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 11:03 PM
7

By fighting against the concept of rape culture and rape, period. By going back to blaming and shaming rape victims Holy fuck you're serious... by fighting against the.... concept of rape What do you mean by this? Rape is a serious and fucked up crime. It's not like carrying a gram of pot, where it should be normalized or decriminalized.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 10:01 PM
3

finding out that feminism is shit And how's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/14 04:18 PM
0

I didn't say it disproves anything. Try actually reading my comment.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 11:42 AM
3

You're the wrong one. Just read the paper for christ's sake. Your conclusion is refuted by their data.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 12:29 AM
1

Did you even read the fucking paper? Here, using genome-wide analyses of X, Y, autosomal and mitochondrial DNA, in combination with extensive population genetic simulations, we show that low observed Y chromosome variability is** not consistent with a purely neutral model.** In other words, it's likely not due to a small effective (mating) population of males.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 12:24 AM
-2

ou can't name your boss because she doesn't exist. Anyone at the top of their field worldwide is already a public figure, and would have quite a large support staff. She's at the top of her field in a female dominated field, actually (honey bee research), bet that really makes your skin crawl. No, she exists. But I'm not so unprofessional as to let a child bait me into giving out her name.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 03:02 AM
-3

I'm not about to share my boss' name to a beligerent and raging misogynist. Look, if you insist on shoving everything into antiquated and ill-fitted holes because your dick likes feminine, you're defeating yourself. Your bullshit is based on weak and volatile emotion, not logic. You and OP are the vapid ones.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 02:09 AM
0

young women say fuck that noise. They get easy credit loans on a car, get a job in the city, play dress up in their "I'm a professional!" outfits, and get to be around alpha businessmen. The culprit here is Modernity. You want a mindless drone, and modern women are vapid? Are you dull? I can't stand this sort of entitled stupidity and misogony. YES. It's misogynistic to think women should do nothing but serve you. And, it's misogynistic to think a woman doing anything else is pretending. God dam…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 12:40 AM
1

These risks, numb-nuts -http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/fitness/in-depth/performance-enhancing-drugs/art-20046134
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 02:03 AM
2

Wait. You think spermjacking is even remotely a regular occurrence?
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 10:55 PM
1

No, because a woman wouldn't say "I've been tempted by the cock carousel. " that's a stupid nonsense phrase created by neckbeards that are afraid of female sexuality.
/r/askTRP18/07/14 04:28 PM
13

Confirmed for not a real woman.
/r/askTRP17/07/14 08:32 PM
1

No they're not. If there's an issue with the health of a population it isn't because the constituents pose a threat. It's because they're being neglected, or aren't being given the resources they need to remain healthy.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 06:01 PM
2

Along these thoughts, don't let men of Reddit shape your views of women in general either. Primarily because they generally have no clue.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 10:13 PM
4

I've had two great female managers. Both better than any of their male colleagues.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:36 PM
4

Maybe if Hitler worshipped Jews and wanted to exterminate Aryans/whites, then you could say the Democrats are borderline Nazi What in the hell are you rambling about?
/r/askTRP09/07/14 04:57 PM
7

This is the biggest piece of shit I've ever read.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 10:00 PM
-1

If you think there's any truth in this, you're sheltered.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 06:10 PM
3

You're completely talking out of your ass. None of this is based in truth. Women are only marginally more negatively affected by social isolation (risk ratio of 2.8 as opposed to 2.3 for men source. Whether or not an individual accepts blame has little to do with whether the social group imposes consequences on the individual.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 06:56 AM
1

No. I don't think the conversation happened. My bullshit meter was off the chart, and I think it's hilarious it got the response it did.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:47 AM
1

Oh God this doesn't even begin to read like real people were talking. Reading this was cringeworthy.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:40 AM
2

Actually, I'm not angry. Just calling it like I see it: You're a fucker and you're pretentious. Hence: pretentious fuck.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 05:55 PM
2

Really? I don't remember saying I was, you pretentious fuck.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 05:27 PM
3

If you're being honest, I've got you beat: both of my parents are scary smart and look like they're 40 at the oldest, even though they're both 57. In their prime, both would score any tail they wanted, they were that good looking. I still don't have any ridiculous delusions that the world would be missing out if I didn't procreate.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 04:02 PM
3

And what makes you so sure in your arrogance? For all I know, you're a fucking hunchback with the brain of a poodle.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 02:55 PM
2

Not trolling. I just expect people to stick to relevant discussion. Though this thread is all total bullshit. Epigenetics as a mechanism to improve offsping immune function? Give me a break.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:55 AM
1

Sure, his comment was dumb. But I'm pointing out that you threw out a link just to feel smart even though it wasn't relevant.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:52 AM
2

You responded to someone who said you die with the genes you're born with... with a link to epigenetics. So you're admitting your comment was not actully adding anything to the discussion let alone refuting what /u/spingler said.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 02:45 AM
1

Right, but as I said below, it doesn't store information in the germline that will improve immune functions...
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 01:44 AM
5

Epigenetics != changes in the genome. Epigenetics also doesn't store information is sperm that would improve it's "genetic quality."
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 01:43 AM
1

You pre-select women by immediately turning off those that have personalities outside of their male counterpart.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 06:16 AM
3

I'm sure you do, likely too high. But if you're only finding dull women, it can only be assumed it's your fault, since women with the capacity to have intelligent conversation are plenty if you're attractive to them.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 06:15 AM
3

I mean you subscribe to a philosophy that inherently selects for women that require a man to "be their personality."
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 05:25 AM
5

It's amazing that the irony escapes you. You prey on women, you're only going to get the dull ones that aren't clever enough to see you for the snake you are.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 05:21 AM
3

Blows my fucking mind.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 12:23 AM
2

Tagged as "definitely a rapist".
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 12:22 AM
-2

Well it would be rape, so, you know. You'd deserve the allegations and conviction.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 02:44 PM
4

You have absolutely no data to suggest the vast majority are false. You're a dim witted child that is afraid of women. You shake in your piss stained shorts anytime you think a female dare seem like a human.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 02:08 PM
5

But you have no reason or knowledge that makes starting from the assumption that she wants attention to be valid. You're just a dick that has childish pre-suppositions about women.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 05:27 PM
6

You did. She was unconcious and woke to someone fucking her. That's the definition of rape. Your refusal to believe it is rape isn't noble skepticism, you're just an asshole.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 02:25 PM
33

How dare she claim to have been raped after... being raped... i.e. someone decided to have sex with her without her consent because she passed out, you fucking nitwit.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 03:55 AM
2

/r/thathappened
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 05:33 PM
-1

That's what we call the placebo effect, my friend.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 06:21 PM
1

The bullet point about cell phones is total horse shit. Cell phones don't emit ionizing radiation so will not increase the risk of cancer or reduce sperm production.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 10:53 PM
0

I see you chose to ignore the evidence I gave. Nice! The best arguments are based on insufficient information! Wait... Again, really what a spectacular failure you are.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:01 AM
0

Solid argument, dude. Really. It amazes me that you're a real person and I hold on to the hope that you are a troll. I've scanned your comment history and you seem to use real logic about none of the time. So, good luck with your life of ignorance.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:35 AM
0

Except that his or her example is exactly the problem, and a very common trend in STEM resulting from the evidence I provided. So, nice job at failing to marginalize yet another person.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:16 AM
0

Look at the statistics. Women are discriminated against in STEM. Indeed, they are disproportionately denied publications. In fact, even when the same paper is submitted for review but with either a man's or woman's name on it, the version with the woman's name gets a lower score! You're deluded. I'll link it to you, too. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 etc. etc. etc. etc....
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:54 AM
2

Fuck, you're right but you're being downvoted because this sub is full of self-righteous men not actually interested in truthful and honest discussion.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:50 AM
1

False. You're fucking ignoring entire systematic machinations that covertly and not-so-covertly discourage and prevent females from being in the STEM fields. http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/drupal/system/files/FF_Women_STEM.pdf http://www.aauw.org/resource/why-so-few-women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics/ http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Even in fields where the gender gap starts out slim at the Under…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter