TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Not-Your-Bunny Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by Not-Your-Bunny on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Basically, you're supporting terrorism as a means to an end?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:03 AM
1

We should fight for men's rights because we believe in a fair and just society, not because we're scared of them. It's like saying we should give in to the requests of Islamic terrorists because otherwise they'll get angry and dangerous.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:54 PM
1

r|menslib is feminism for men. It has nothing to do with men's rights or even men particularly. The men's liberation movement is what MRA's originated from. Feminism for men is a different thing, in fact it has a different subreddit. Feminism treats women's issues. r/MensLib focuses on men's rights only. Tell me about patriarchy theory and how men have oppressed women like forever. Patriarchy is a social system in which men hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, mor…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:16 PM
1

I think mostly pushing for policies that hurt men, but most people seem to think that's inherently a fault of feminism and that it should just be removed as a movement, so instead of contrasting the specific policies they oppose the whole movement. Again, I have nothing against this, criticism is legitimate
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:04 AM
1

I don't and I haven't. What I'm saying is it makes no sense for them to then expect to work with feminism, especially when they're not only criticizing those organizations, but the whole premise and existance of feminism
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:45 AM
1

It depends on the circumstances and how harmful it is. I don't care if they're making girls play with car toys and boys play with dolls. I wouldn't support many of them. I would speak against it if someone in my circle pushed for it. My focus is on women's rights and their violations, specifically when linked to religious extremism. I make sure I support feminist organizations that respect equality and men's rights, but I can't fight everyone's battle.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:32 PM
1

I think it's bullshit most of the time. I can understand the idea behind setting a minimum percentage of female employees in certain industries, but I don't see why you wouldn't also set a minimum number for male employees. It's not about advantaging women, but making sure they're not discriminated against. They shouldn't get the job if they're not qualified. Even if the reason they're not qualified enough stems from sexism that's not the way to deal with it. For example, in this case I believe …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:56 AM
1

Everyone having equal rights and equal opportunities without discrimination based on gender
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:27 AM
1

I was thinking about men's rights when I was talking about gender equality. You started your comment by saying Technically, I am a liberal feminist But then said you just didn't feel comfortable with the label because you don't like parts of the movement. That's why I thought we were talking about feminism and women's rights specifically. Gender inequalities affect both women and men and feminism only tackles directly women's issues, I never claimed otherwise. Men's advocates have two options, t…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:14 AM
1

So what are people who don’t think this is the best approach to gender equality supposed to do? It really depends whether you're okay with egalitarianism or you specifically want to focus on women's rights and women's issues. There isn't a women's rights movement that isn't feminism. I support women's issues worldwide and criticize feminist organizations who fuck up. I think criticism from the inside is much more valuable. I also don't believe there is one feminist movement, or one very clear di…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:15 AM
2

So basically, it's all men's fault then, right? No, it's no one's fault. It's just the way society developed. It's not men's fault and it's not your fault. Got a link where you actually did this? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cm7kr1/i_was_sitting_on_the_train_and_a_feminist_looked/ew1g81p?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share This will have to do, I don't have time to scroll through my profile for better examples and I'm not sure I'd find one, I have like 5 different profiles. I…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:52 AM
1

Say what? https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/3fjljg/i_want_to_let_you_all_know_about_a_sub_i_just/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share As far as I know, the men's rights movement branched off the men's liberation movement because of contrasting views, mainly how they see feminism. It looks like MRA's disagree with everything about the premises and rethoric of feminism and believe it is inherently evil, harmful and hateful towards men. That's very feminist of you. Case in point
/r/MensRights06/08/19 08:11 AM
1

A counter argument might be useful so that I can explain what the difference would be for me, but that's fine. I would say the reasoning is that the very fact that's you're having women speak out about the struggles they face on their own is in itself a way for them to claim (or celebrate, depending on the country) freedom of speech and prove that they're able to advocate for themselves. Even if women being silenced isn't a large-scale issue anymore in many developed countries, there are still p…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 06:28 PM
1

Look, I am a feminist and I see a lot of things wrong with many feminist movements and organizations. There isn't any influential women's rights movements that isn't feminism, and I very much care about fighting for women's rights. I also very much care about men's rights and will speak out when people, including other feminists, shit on them. As a feminist. The point is that the men's rights movement was born with the aim of denouncing and tearing down feminism. That's your right, but you can't…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 05:58 PM
1

Thank you. Some of the comments in this thread are just insane. Unless she actually physically couldn't sit next to you you did nothing wrong and she was just really shitty.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:32 PM
-2

As far as I know feminists and men's liberation activists are on good terms. Feminists and MRA's can't really work together because the whole point of MRA's is that feminism is evil and hurts men.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:23 PM
1

I'm not saying we should over focus on the past or use it to excuse us, only that it is understandable to want as main spokespersons for these organizations the same people who didn't use to have a voice or be allowed to express their opinions. It is reasonable to want to put their experiences and their struggles first and give them a platform to express them. The term ally doesn't bother me that much for that reason.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:50 PM
0

Up until 200 years ago, %95 of humans were farmers Universal suffrage was less than 100 years ago in most countries, including yours. In mine it was granted in 1946, 73 years ago. My dad's age. If you look at human history and what we had to do to survive as a species, there was a reason everything had to be organized male-centric What I'm saying is that it was "male-centric" and that women lacked certain freedoms, not that there weren't reasons for it or posing any type of moral judgment on his…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:22 AM
0

Okay, I’ll keep that in mind next time I try and defy gravity. The fact that something true is called a law doesn't mean that everything you call a law is true. Keep that in mind next time you defy Murphy's law. I could give many examples Please do. No, thank you, I have better things to do with my day than spend an hour describing dysfunctional families and abusive relationships to a stranger on reddit. I also don't believe anecdotal evidence holds much weight, so it wouldn't be very useful. Th…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 09:28 AM
-1

Calling something a "law" doesn't make it true. Abusive people of both sexes exist and I could give many examples of families where women have absolutely no say, vagina or not. I could give many examples of the opposite as well, but I see no indication that it is or ever was the norm. It wasn't the case in my family, for one. But even if it were true, if your freedom of speech and opinion is subordinated to you having to marry and please someone else sexually it's not much of a freedom. I don't …
/r/MensRights05/08/19 08:30 AM
1

Women didn't use to have a voice in society. They didn't use to be allowed to vote. The Bible says women aren't allowed to speak in church, and that if they have any questions they should wait until they're home and ask their husbands. The reason why people use the term ally is to underline the fact that they want to focus on hearing the voices of the people who for centuries didn't have one. Same goes for members of LGBT, who used to have to hide while everyone else decided on their faith, and …
/r/MensRights05/08/19 08:04 AM
2

https://ncadv.org/statistics Here they're talking about 10 million victims of abuse (not necessarily homicide), maybe that's what they were referring to?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:25 PM
2

No, his point was that feminist organizations (which are about political power, not women's rights) shouldn't receive funding because they take non-gendered issues, like domestic violence, and treat them in a gendered way OP's comment: they're going to focus on women's rights violation. Which is why they should never be given taxpayer funding. I disagree with that and was replying to that. If you want to tackle a true women's only issue like cervical cancer, then fine - you can do that in a gend…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:18 PM
2

A cancer research who clings to ideologically-driven false beliefs like that and is twisted by such hatred for men, should not receive government funding and neither should feminists, for the same reason If you believe that some specific women's rights organizations shouldn't receive government funding because they promote false narratives, sexism and hatred, that's valid but a completely different point to the one I was arguing against. OP's point was that women's rights organizations shouldn't…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:06 PM
2

Which is why they should never be given taxpayer funding. Things work differently in my country, but this to me sounds like saying that cancer research shouldn't get funding because they only focus their attention on cancer and don't care about diabetes. I think we need two separate movements that support women's rights and men's rights at the moment, they're different issues and both deserve organizations that focus mainly on one and not the other. You'd think a sub named "MensRights" would agr…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:46 AM
3

First of all, I don't doubt your honesty and good intentions, but you should provide a link to this page and your other sources so that people can know whether they're credible and/or do further research on your own. For example this link I found says that on average one woman is killed every 9 days by a partner and one man every 29 days, but it isn't specifically about 2019, so I would like to compare the information to figure out where the inconsistency comes from. https://www.aihw.gov.au/repo…
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:05 AM
1

One of the actual causal factors suggested -- perhaps in the studies themselves, but maybe it was just by those who were referencing them that I've listened to the idea is that many women become involved closely with feminism because they initially have a strong but guilt-laden interest in questions of what is consent and non-consent I would have to look at the studies, I don't believe you're lying or misrepresenting them, but a few studies don't prove something and the suggested explanation isn…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 10:45 AM
2

Turns out nope, everyone else is just regular retarded LOL
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:47 PM
1

Thank you. "Everyone who disagrees with me is emotional and irrational. Also all the people in the entire world can be grouped neatly into 4 categories that explain exactly how they think."
/r/MensRights02/07/19 10:12 PM
1

I wasn't talking about prison rape Oh sorry, my mistake :) as far as I know, studies show that the majority of people convicted of the crime do not consider the assaults to be sexually enjoyable I guess it might be true, I'm not familiar with those studies. I just found it confusing because I don't quite understand how one could claim sexual desire plays no role in every single case. It particularly confuses me if I think of child rape and abuse, because those are often perpetrated by pedophiles…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:54 PM
1

Who you associate with outside of working hours is your choice. I've been very clear on this point; inside of the office, women should have every opportunity There just isn't such a clear line. Many professions rely on you having strong relationships with your clients, taking them out to dinner, show them around the city, having casual lunches together. Many professions require you to have a deep web of connections and friendships in order to keep yourself relevant and move forward in your caree…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 02:22 PM
1

How are your ludicrous examples even relevant? They are all examples in which a woman would need to spend time alone with a man, which you are suggesting men should avoid at all costs. Why is the fact that I named an imaginary woman "Karen" somehow worthy of criticism? https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/karen It was far from being my main criticism, but it's still an unfortunate choice especially being on reddit. The fact of the matter is if a man does not want to invite Karen to his private barbecu…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:27 PM
1

We all know that important connections are often made at private barbecues, dinners and golf games rather than strictly business conferences. Also who would hire someone that can have no relationship with her colleagues or clients and needs separate accommodations and considerations wherever they go. What if there is no other available room on another floor? Do we just leave "Karen" (good job choosing a neutral, completely non stereotypical female name by the way) home? Is she even allowed to se…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:54 AM
1

Again, your point is that this would be just and necessary discrimination. You can't say that treating a very specific category of people differently than anyone else isn't discrimination. Take responsibility for your opinions. Your opinion is that all women deserve to be discriminated against and given a huge disadvantage because they all have to take responsibility for the words of some women. My career would be impossible if I weren't able to have conversations privately with other male colle…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 07:21 AM
1

I think people are deviant enough without any need for the internet to spread or challenge anything. Fetishes and BDSM have existed since the very first human civilizations. I as many other kinky people have been this way since I was a little kid, before I was introduced to the internet or even to the concept of sex. Many of us are born this way. Deviant, if you will. In my personal experience, the internet has only provided a place to find information to do things safely, people to connect with…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:12 PM
1

So I don't live in the US and this isn't really what things are like in my country at all, I would probably speak against that if I lived there, but not as a feminist, simply as someone who supports human rights in general and men's rights in particular. If you're invested in women's rights specifically, I think you should speak up whenever you see things like this, but I'm not sure that it makes sense for you to focus your whole attention and be considered responsible for what some feminists do…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:55 PM
1

If this doesn't actually represent the alleged majority, what are they doing about it? Look I don't know, probably worrying about women's issues and supporting equality and ignoring insane people. If I hear someone say those things outloud I'll more than happily speak up against them, but I never have and I'm certainly not going out of my way to waste my time arguing with them, when that kind of ideas (exterminating all males?) are never going to gain a significant following anyway.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 06:47 PM
1

included constant references to studies showing that the vast majority of rapists in prison reported receiving little to no sexual pleasure from forcing themselves on someone I just think there are very different dinamics that lead prison rape vs marital rape vs the assault of a drunk girl at a bar vs other instances. I doubt you could put all rape under one umbrella and while I can definitely see how rape could be purely an act of violence in certain situations, I also vividly remember my frien…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 05:48 PM
0

It is not discrimination to refuse to go to lunch with a woman, to refuse to sit next to her on a flight, to reserve a separate floor for her hotel room It is not discrimination to refuse to go to lunch with a black person, to refuse to sit next to them on a flight, to reserve a separate floor for their hotel room These things are quite literally the definition of discrimination, you can argue whether this would be good or necessary discrimination, but you can't really say that it isn't. This co…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:22 PM
1

but there are seriously wild fetishes. MILFs 😂 Also all those things besides furries and hentai ("Japanese cartoon porn" lol) have existed for centuries, it's just that you didn't know about them before the internet unless it was your thing. And I doubt the internet is causing that many people to get into scat, unless it is their thing.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:11 PM
1

Wait...isn't rape an act of violence that has nothing to do with sexual desire or attraction? Is it? I don't think so. It can definitely be a simple act of violence (often prison rape is just that, for example), but it's also very often linked with sexual desire and/or attraction. This doesn't mean that only universally attractive people get raped or that they are raped more often, but rape can absolutely be driven by sexual desire. I've never heard people deny that. How is that assertion from f…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 03:57 PM
1

Hi most people would probably consider me a feminist and I absolutely love men. I also don't think most feminists blame actual men for the things you mentioned, even if one believes those are real issues men didn't personally choose for things to be a certain way, it would just be the way society developed. Some men might be responsible for perpetrating certain actions or ideologies, but the vast majority of men are not responsible and are lovely people.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter