TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NotNearlyTrue Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by NotNearlyTrue on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Lemme give it a try: unsollicited recognizement is rape?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:25 PM
3

Well, not just deception, it was an attack against her body (disregarding the fetus here). If we consider the fetus not to have an existence in its own right, then it is in the very least part of the pregnant woman's body. Killing / destroying it would be similar to a mutilation (even if the means to achieve the results was 'merely' chemical). I agree that if we did consider fetuses to be alive / human, then it would be a murder (as would abortion).
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:34 PM
1

I think we agree discrimination is always both positive and negative (depending on whose point of view you take). From there, what information does qualifying some discrimination as "positive" convey? Using "affirmative" only falsely infers that not all discrimination is negative, which I think was Bobsutan's point in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:53 PM
2

In this case, it is non-disabled people who are being discriminated against. (Unless disabled people are forced to take that line, in which case they are being discriminated against too.)
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:17 PM
1

Sudden heat can make water boil pretty fast, or so I heard
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:17 PM
1

Falsifiable evidence is always a good thing to have :p
/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:12 PM
2

I don't mean to sound negative, but I'd say such statistics are more harmful than not. I mean, it is nearly equivalent to saying "Whilst the overwhelming majority of violence is done against women, we could find one documented case of a victim male in 1985.". It can only confirm the wrong stereotype men cannot be victims of DV. 5%? Negligible...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:07 PM
1

The one problem with it is that answer B is a straight out admission that the woman / wife has reasons to believe <the dude> might not be the father. In a married couple, it would be equivalent to saying "hey! btw, I slept around :D". The second answer should be a lot less telling, and instead be "<the dude>'s paternity should be scientifically tested" (for which there may be perfectly legitimate reasons even when being faithful). If it were not for the frightening drawbacks of doing so, it woul…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:43 PM
2

Somehow relevant: "If it wasn't you, then it was your brother." (http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/get_text.html?TextId=5710)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:38 PM
2

what if there are invisible dragons in my attic? :( I wish
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:25 PM
1

who exactly doesn't want him (if I may)
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:43 PM
4

Allow me to disagree: not guilty means exactly what it means, ie innocent. Charges being dropped due to lack of evidence (eg. DSK case) is not the same thing as a jury declaring someone "not guilty". A court will not rule "probably innocent", or "probably guilty but not so very sure". And that's a good thing, too. (Of course, we are talking from a legal / procedurial point of view. Courts can be wrong. However, challenging a court's verdict "mm they let him off but he was probably guilty!" can (…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:03 PM
3

Just an example of one of the places in which the alleged rape did not happen. Helps locating the non-existing violence. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:34 PM
1

2 or 3 weeks seem like an aweful lot of time to me, but I agree with your points nonetheless.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:16 PM
4

Well, try to see it another way. In most modern societies, you are not supposed to take the law in your own hands (and "punish" your offender yourself). Instead, you should contact the police and have the whole justice system handle it for you. In the case of legitimate defense, you would be excused for not having followed the normal procedure "POLICE! HELP! SOMEONE IS KILLING ME LIKE... RIGHT NOW... ARGGGG" when doing so would definitely not work (eg. help would come too late if you tried) and …
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:21 AM
1

Wrong in what sense?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 10:03 PM
12

Just speaking from France, but (here at least) self defense is not about "retaliating legally", but about not being responsible for actions taken for the strict defense of someone (be it you or someone else btw) when the reaction is proportionate to the threat (proportionality being appreciated by the judge if it gets to court). If the offense is done already (ie you were slapped and the aggressor does not seem to want to give it another go), there is no threat anymore. In a strict sense, you wo…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter