TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NotThat2 Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by NotThat2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Do you think there are no innocents in prison? And as for the guilty people in prison, do you think them getting raped is not so much of an issue because they are guilty of an unrelated crime?
/r/MensRights17/09/16 07:20 AM
1

That's hilarious. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:19 PM
1

This gets 4 upvotes? MR is crazy when it comes to the topic of circumcision. Be against it all you want, I'd love to hear you explain the logical leap from circumcised son => hate son.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:50 PM

You couldn't care less about a business making you sit at the back of the bus?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:51 AM
1

You're naive to think NK has a fair and unbiased justice system. The fact that he's an outsider absolutely plays into the whole affair and the treatment that he's getting.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:20 PM
3

Reading this thread, apparently dogsled racing.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 06:06 AM
17

That's interesting and I never heard of it before, so I googled and from what I gather it's the average woman who is better than the average man at long distance swimming, due to buoyancy. The fastest men are still faster than the fastest women (athletes starting from a certain threshhold?). http://dailynews.openwaterswimming.com/2014/04/women-versus-men-in-open-water-world.html https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/26gj00/why_are_women_comparatively_better_than_men_at/
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 05:48 AM
10

Poor athletes having to put up with this BS. Can you imagine losing out on your life's goal because someone is essentially cheating, and the rules allow it?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/16 05:37 AM
1

You are right, he is wrong and immature.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:50 PM
8

Being a female on the internet has it's down sides, sure. It also has it's upsides. Gamer female streamers frequently obtain many more viewers than their male counterparts, more donations, all the while being lesser skilled in the games they stream.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:29 PM
3

Thank you for articulating a reasoning other than simply appealing to emotions. A question: Wouldn't by the same logic mostly anything be worse than murder, since there's very little suffering from the point of view of the murdered who is dead?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:38 AM
2

Dissenter detected
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:41 AM
17

To me the point is that higher costs for males are tolerated, while higher costs for females are not. Legality should not play a role here. Incidentally, why stop at gender based price discrimination? By the same token any criteria may be used by business owners to discriminate prices, including ethnicity / religion / people the business owner doesn't like. Free market has ways of dealing with such an establishment (demonstrations, bad publicity, bans, etc). The point is these methods will be pu…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:13 AM
0

It's so ingrained in the male psyche to want to help women in need. I saw her video and all I wanted was to reach out through the camera and help the poor girl.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:47 AM
36

Greer found that regardless of the contract, “each spouse should be able to continue to live in a fashion that, while not equal, does not require the wife, in this instance, to have to immediately sell her matrimonial home or one or more of the cottages in her name.” Prenuptial agreement aren't worth the paper they're printed on, says court. Edit: Not prenupital agreement. Nevertheless, contracts to divide assets in case of separation aren't worth the paper they're printed on. The court overrule…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:09 PM

What does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:32 PM

I have no knowledge of the crime that took place in India, however I have a question: Would you propose the equivalent of castration if the perpetrators were female?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:06 PM
1

Allow me to play devil's advocate here. When a person fires a gun at someone and misses, he gets charged with assault with a deadly weapon. He is trialed based on a possible outcome (which is statistically likely) that he would inflict major harm to someone, although he didn't. How is this different than charging men more severely for assault of women, even if they inflicted no greater harm in a specific case?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:38 AM

I was skimming through the comments and gladly caught yours. It is one of the most true and most profound things I've read on reddit. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 10:06 PM
9

Say this to women's amateur boxing.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:11 PM

Don't quote me on this, but I believe professional boxing is official olympic sport for men but women are only allowed in amateur. EDIT: Upon checking, indeed both men and women boxing was amateur this olympic games. The only difference being amount of rounds, duration, and weight classes. Carry on.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:10 PM

If it were a male teacher, his picture would be all over the place so that if you happen to know him or see him in the street you would know.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:38 PM

You shouldn't back down on your original statement (if that's indeed what you're acknowledging here), I think it's a fair point. Yes, men ask women out more so than the other way around. However it can still be argued that whoever asks should pay. I suggest all the people who down voted you (who I assume share Hamakua's argument) set out to change the culture in which men are the ones doing the asking if they're bothered by "asker pays by default". They may also want to ask themselves why is it …
/r/MensRights24/06/12 12:59 PM
8

There are few videos on the internet that disturb me as much as this one.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:28 AM

It's from a tv show in India where insulting participants is part of the game. She lost it and slapped the guy which is clearly outside the rules of the show.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:27 AM
4

Defending yourself against an attacking woman in crowded places can be much more dangerous than letting her slug at you. Not just in India.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:25 AM
3

I'm surprised there aren't more infants being prosecuted for sexual offences. Those babies keep coming out of their mom's genitals, and are obsessed with tits. Something must be done.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:51 AM

Stopping a black driver for looking suspicious.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:22 AM
3

No reason for you apologizing on their behalf. I read the comments and every other comment mentions that this isn't a women only problem, but society as a whole. Also you're not accountable for what any group you happen to belong to does. Apologizing for other people's actions should be reserved for special cases.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 03:54 AM
-1

Men keeping women out of the workforce to protect their jobs makes about as much economic sense as the claim that 'immigrants are taking our jobs'. Sure on a superficial level that may be the case, but society (including it's working male members) overall benefit from a higher standard of living due to higher productivity and lower manufacturing costs. Not to mention the moral argument, that males / locals / any group does not have the moral ground to forcibly prevent another group from entering…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 11:33 AM
17

Politicians Bligh and Gillard may have had a rough weekend, but neither woman ever asked the public to vote for them because they are women, but because they are leaders. As it must be. Over here at Israel in the last election the female candidate for PM Tzipi Livni had a TV campaign ad that said "if you are a woman, you must vote for Tzipi Livni". So, yeah, so much for that. There were no cries about it either. It seems as though I'm the only one who was bothered. Edit: I'm trying to find the a…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:38 AM

Of course he won't respond. If someone sends you a private message it's totally fine to ignore it because no one will ever know. Luckily, there's this thing called the internet...
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:17 AM
1

I remain unconvinced that a trans on HRT is on equal footing with females. You reference a decrease in muscle mass. When discussing athletes who rely on muscles to perform, who can say that a trans on HRT did not retain more muscle than a female? I don't even know how would you set out to prove this, since obviously at sports you tend to have athletes who have good muscle development for their gender. I doubt we'll convince each other on this subject. It's probably best we'll leave it at that.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:41 PM
1

Beauty contest wise, it's just a matter of what's socially acceptable. If more people want to see trans people in the same contest as the gender they've transitioned into, then that's what the beauty contests will choose. Heck, you may even end up with a split, with some competitions allowing them, and some do not. Regarding HRT negates born male strength, you're going to need to be a lot more scientific about it. It's not enough to show that it lowers strength, but that it negates ANY AND ALL b…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 08:51 PM
1

Regarding Miss Universe, read the other thread in the comments to my original comment. How can you be sure HRT negates any strength advantage of being born male?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 08:31 PM
2

Estrogen doesn't build muscle, but for male->female transition you have the issue of the person being biologically male and may have unfair advantages competing with women.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 08:14 PM
1

No. I get into this a bit in the ensuing discussion. Basically it's quite possible for a trans person to find him/her self banned from both groups for competition. This is not unique for trans people. Non trans athletes who inject hormones to enhance their performance get banned from competing as well.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 08:05 PM
1

I'm all for not splitting things unnecessarily into 'female' and 'male' categories. Coming from computer gaming world, it bugs me whenever I see a women only tournament. Same for Chess. But hey, what can I do. I'd be careful about allowing a trans woman in women competitive event. If she wins, you're going to have the question "did she really deserve that...". For informal events it doesn't make a difference, but you have to be really careful when there are prizes and record setting involved.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:33 PM
1

Sports wise, they don't really fit into male or female. It's just like any other athlete who took hormones and is not allowed to participate in formal competition. Beauty contest wise, it's just a matter of what's socially acceptable. If more people want to see trans people in the same contest as the gender they've transitioned into, then that's what the beauty contests will choose. Heck, you may even end up with a split, with some competitions allowing them, and some not.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:10 PM

I'm not trying to separate them from anything. I just think it's problematic to include them in the other group in events where the biological sex is the selection criteria. A line has to be drawn somewhere and biological sex seems to me like the most obvious place to draw it. If not at biological sex, where do you draw the line? Personally I couldn't care less about a Miss Universe contest. As far as I'm concerned they can set whatever rules they want and make separate groups however way they w…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:58 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're trying to argue. Is it that trans people should be allowed to participate in any and all events meant for their gender? ie, male->female should be allowed in female competitive sports? Including record setting?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 02:56 PM
2

From wikipedia: Gender is a range of characteristics used to distinguish between males and females More accurate to discuss a person's sex (biological sex) than gender for this purpose, so language-wise he has a point.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 02:53 PM

Physical ability is the reason usually. However not always. In order for trans women to be on perfectly even footing as actual women you have to be extremely strict to ensure no advantages remain, and I doubt that's the case. Are trans women allowed to set world records at women's sporting events? Doubtful. You aren't born with a gender. Go learn the difference between sex and gender, transphobe. I was indeed mistaken to use the word gender when I meant sex. English is not my first language. I w…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 12:32 PM
1

What did the accuser lose exactly? If she indeed made up the story after a break up, sounds like she has won quite a bit.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:57 AM

You're stuck with the sex you're born with for life. Surgeries and hormones injections do not change this. What the legal definition is I do not know, nor care. So long as we have events that are divided into 'male' and 'female' categories (sports, competitions, records) then it's perfectly reasonable to bar a transgendered person from participating in the other category. Edit: To the 100% of people who downvoted me: care to state your objections? Are they the same as Embogenous'? Because if so …
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:40 AM

haha someone downvoted you for that. That's rich.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:31 AM
3

Lowtax... There's a name that takes me back. Is he still active?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 09:30 PM
2

Don't forget you're committing rape just by posting here.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 08:30 PM
6

Way to be racist.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:03 PM
2

The only way to get rid of this stereotype is to make ourselves heard. You know, I wouldn't mind about stereotypes at the expense of men, if it weren't for the fact that men as a group are being discriminated against left and right. So long as this is the case, stereotypes like this do more than joke at our expense, they actively harm us.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:30 PM
3

Never underestimate people's ideologies. They fight us because they believe they are right and we are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:49 PM
1

Sadly it would be thrown out at court. Family court judge is the law, and no prenup will keep him from delivering justice with a vengeance.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:31 PM

IMO media's responsibility sometimes goes beyond reporting both sides for equality. Some things are either just or unjust, and pretending there's two (equal) sides to every coin is potentially hurtful.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:25 PM
2

"assumed guilty until proven guilty" I like that expression. Very fitting.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 12:46 AM
1

Just today on the news they did a number on how we should add a law that states that parents must vaccinate their children in order to send them to public schools. This isn't what I wanna talk about. What I do want to talk about is, they filmed a parent who basically said one sentence: "they (parents who don't vaccinate) take advantage of the fact that we do vaccinate our children". It's a bit hard to convey in text, but his tone conveyed that he was taken advantage of, as if vaccinating his chi…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:41 PM
2

I've read something in a Richard Dawkins book which I find interesting; He asks: why is the male/female ratio roughly 50/50? Since from a reproductive view point, a smaller number of males could keep a greater number of females pregnant, would it not be beneficial for the species to have more females and less males? His answer is this: imagine a situation where there is a greater number of females than males. Let's say 66/33 split. In this situation, from an evolutionary standpoint, which would …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:46 PM
2

If only it was just in comedy...
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:19 PM
3

"This judge needs to be thrown out of court." Does this EVER happen?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:09 PM

"everyone who isn't our religion needs to die" is potentially shared by many religion (and has been actively shared by some in the past). However out of the major religions, Islam is the only one which actively pursues it on a large scale at this time.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:04 PM
3

I got nothing helpful to contribute, I just want to say my heart goes out for you reading this. It's a very unjust world we're living in.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:52 PM

"Females have more inherent value..." I'd be careful about such statements. Is your reasoning for this statement the biological state that a woman is required for up to several years for delivering pregnancy / caring for the infant, whereas a man is required for the duration of the intercourse?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:36 PM

Similarly to Muslims. "You say we're violent? We KILL you!"
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:28 PM
1

My heart just broke.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:24 PM
1

This reminds me of a bulletin posted in my university's hall: "Professor, when you look at my cleavage you are performing sexual violence." With such twists of terms, it's unsurprising that statistics such as this are spouted.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:50 AM
2

True.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 05:29 AM
2

You're asking the wrong person, because I'm not saying that one is okay while the other is not.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:19 PM
2

Hmm maybe I was not clear enough in my original post. I said that I think it should be a business owner's prerogative to use price discrimination and / or refuse to offer services to whomever he wishes. If you're asking me why do I think it's a business owner prerogative, I'll happily expound on that. But I'm not sure what to make of the last part of your comment. The reason refusing patronage to people of black color would be national news is two fold: Because most people in society disagree wi…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:58 PM

Discrimination is wrong when done by the state / under law. When discussing a private business owner, things are a bit different. When you own a business and offer services to customers, any transactions that goes on between you and your customers need to be mutually agreed upon and to your mutual benefit. When you have laws stating you can't refuse to offer services to people, then I claim it is the business owner's rights that are being violated by these laws. It is very much the same as laws …
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:46 PM
1

Are you responding to me?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 06:33 PM

I've read your post twice, and I have no idea what you are trying to say.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:30 PM

I wouldn't like a business having a Caucasian night, but I think it is the business owner right to have one if he so desires in his own private business. Just as I wouldn't like it if a business did that, I suspect a big portion of the population wouldn't like it either, and that a business who did it would alienate a lot customers. It would be a very bad business decision to make.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 01:33 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 01:16 PM
2

But of course we form our opinions partly based on listening to the opinions of others. We can't personally experience a wide enough variety of things to solely base our ideas on. Just like in sciences you start by studying the work others have laid out, so in the realm of ideas you hear what people have to say, and then make up your own mind about whether you agree with them or not.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 12:56 PM

Personally, I believe a private business should be allowed to set it's own business rules and prices, including price discrimination and refusing service to customers by it's own discretion (customers in turn may like or dislike said business' practices, including going somewhere else and/or rallying others to boycott said business, etc). My view is congruent with the practice of ladies nights and price discrimination for females, so personally I have no problem with it. What baffles me is that …
/r/MensRights12/01/12 12:49 PM
5

Holy shit!
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:11 PM
-2

You are filth.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 09:33 PM
1

I thought she was about to get raped, and stole the five horses to ride on and get away.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:48 AM
1

Probably because in the eyes of the law as it stands, mothers don't abduct children because the children are theirs.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:36 AM
1

:( is all I have to say.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:33 AM
2

That felt very forced. It's like they had an idea for a selling point, and drunkenly built a commercial out of it.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:10 AM
1

What a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter