~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...Haha, if you say so, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Apparently someone else still upvoted your comment as it stood, though. I think I'll be visiting other subreddits in future. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 07:35 PM |
| 0 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...You're saying that as though there's some form of organized effort in place here. Is that what you think? If not, then who are the perpetrators? Also, I think that this should be pinned to the side of this subreddit. If you have any respect for your own opinion you shouldn't be having to resort to aimlessly downvoting everything you disagree with. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 06:47 PM |
| 0 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...It's a good thing that this a merely a public notice of a suspicious incident then. I don't see a problem. Are you afraid of all men being demonized by this or something? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 06:38 PM |
| -1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...This is exactly the kind of thing that I'm trying to counter here. Why did you bother taking the time out to respond to me when you didn't even take the time or consideration to actually read my comments to see what I'm getting at? Read my post here and then get back to me when you have something constructive to contribute. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 06:16 PM |
| -1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...I'm not saying that the guy must have been up to no good. All I'm saying is that with the information available to us I don't think we're rightly equipped to state with any certainty that he was or was not. If the above doesn't make sense to you then this is a lost cause. I'm not making any assumptions regarding the incident because I'm not making any claims about the incident to begin with. I've said half a dozen times that the man may or may not have had ill intentions, the woman may or may no… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 05:48 PM |
| -1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...Again, neither I nor anyone else has said that the man did anything wrong or anything illegal. It's an arguably suspicious incident and nothing more. As for what actually transpired, the description is ambiguous but it does allow for scenarios that I would label suspicious. Who knows? Maybe it wasn't, but I don't believe anyone here has the authority to say so for certain. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 05:09 PM |
| -3 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...I'm saying that if a woman is approached in such a way that she deems it necessary to report, then perhaps there are subtle nuances to the incident which have not been fully conveyed in the short and ambiguous description of the event; which is all we have to go on regarding what truly happened. The guy might not have had any ill intentions at all, perhaps the woman got the wrong impression and completely overreacted; but I'm sure as hell not going to sit behind a computer hundreds of miles away… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 04:55 PM |
| 1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...I said no such thing. Leave the hyperbole at the front door and relax. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 04:40 PM |
| 3 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...Not at all, it's just the first thread that I happened to comment on and you guys are giving me such a run for my money that I haven't gotten around to any other threads yet! Good observation though. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 03:34 PM |
| 2 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...That's the impression that I'm getting from the description too, and I agree with what you have to say about it. Thanks for the reasoned response. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 03:25 PM |
| 0 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...Fair enough. I don't care about my own personal karma, I just don't like to see reddiquette being abused. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 03:22 PM |
| -9 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...When did I (or anyone) suggest otherwise? Yes, the man has every right to walk anywhere he should please in a public parking lot. Just as any individual has the right to report behaviour they believe to be suspicious. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 03:13 PM |
| -1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...If that's what you think then so be it, I'm satisfied that my own response has been reasonable. I've made no far reaching claims, I've merely stated that we don't have enough information to conclude anything with certainty. p.s. You wouldn't happen to be an otter, would you? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 03:04 PM |
| -2 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...Definitely, and I'm in agreement with you. As I just said to adamsfan42, though, my problem is that while he might have been about to ask for directions or he might have been just looking for his car, the only fact that we can be certain of is that our only exposure to the event is a short and ambiguous description based on the account of a woman who was actually there to see what happened and felt it suspicious enough to report. Of course, I'm not saying that the guy must have been up to no goo… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 02:30 PM |
| 1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...It wasn't explicitly stated, I'll give you that, but the fact that it's been filed as a suspicious incident report suggests to me that it's very likely that there's more to the story than a man simply passing by a woman on the way to his car, whether it's explicitly stated or not. As for it being an over reaction, I suppose that's my problem with this. Given the ambiguity of the description I don't think we have enough information to rightly conclude whether the report really was an over reactio… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 02:18 PM |
| -7 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...he just might have, although it is a super small chance seeing how it was a parking lot, been walking to his car. Which the girl happened to be near. Sure, but that doesn't explain why he would later walk away in the opposite direction. That doesn't strike you as even potentially being suspicious? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 02:10 PM |
| 1 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...I apologize if I come across as being patronising, that isn't my intent at all. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 02:09 PM |
| -11 | This wasn't my University, but the same thing has happened twice at my University...You seem to be cherry picking. Can we at least entertain the notion that if the female reported that she had been approached in a parking lot, it's possible that she felt as though the male had gone out of his way to try and cross paths with her? We're not talking about a narrow sidewalk here where two people with no business with each other must necessarily pass each other. Based on the ambiguity of the description, for all we know it's possible that the male had made a beeline straight toward … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/10 01:45 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter