NovelistResearcher Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Scientific Evidence		NovelistResearcher	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 01:41 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Scientific Evidence Being allowed an education in a few topics does not change the fact that society at the time still did not take women seriously. Their research and education would not have counted for much outside of school as they were still expected to marry and breed as soon as possible, thus limiting their scope for using that education.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 04:26 PM
1	Scientific Evidence This shows that a few, wealthy women were able to be educated in religiously-led institutions but says nothing about the treatment of women in society as a whole. Yes those women got an education, but compared to the percentage of men who were allowed to be educated, it is minimal so does not change the fact that men were unilaterally able to access education whilst women were far more restricted.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 04:24 PM
1	Scientific Evidence So are you saying that MGTOW was entirely created as a safe space for men who believe that women and feminism will ruin the world, to complain and vent about the things they don't like, whilst not being prepared to even try to change their situation for the better? If your responses to anyone challenging your opinions are "Not all MGTOW Are Like That", whilst maintaining the right to claim that all women ARE 'like that', then surely you can see why people challenge you? It's not trolling (on my …	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 04:16 PM
1	Scientific Evidence They were auto-didacts who had access to resources and the time to explore their theories. Women in Da Vincis time were not allowed access to the sort of equipment/books etc he had in order to test his theories and learn his languages. They could only travel in company with a man and would not have been encouraged to chat with locals etc so would not have been able to pick up new languages. It's all well and good saying - "These guys did it without access to schools"...the simple truth is that w…	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 04:07 PM
-1	Scientific Evidence Ok, so these are horrifying stats. One thing I will say to you is - what are men doing about it? Other than shouting and blaming women for all these things, what are men doing to make it better? See, when women came up against this sort of thing, they got together and fought against it - women had laws changed etc to ensure that they were allowed rights to education, actual maternity leave etc. There is absolutely nothing stopping men from making a stand for their own well-being and demanding be…	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 03:29 PM
1	Scientific Evidence Thanks, In that case my answer to your first question is No. The journals linked are the Stanford Medicine Journal and Fast Company, neither of which is mentioned in the article you linked.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 03:15 PM
1	Scientific Evidence It is a bell curve, yet many of the posters here like to state female emotion and male logic as though they are inalienable facts. If your reasoning for GYOW is because of negative personal experiences then I understand and respect that, but I do not see that there is anything to be gained by spouting half-baked 'facts' about human psychology/ neurology as supposed proof that all women are bad and out to destroy men and the world (as seems to be the case in a lot of posts here).	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 03:12 PM
0	Scientific Evidence Picking on their use of the term 'gender' is lazy arguing. The concept of 'Rights' is socially fabricated, rights do not exist in nature so should we ignore them all as well? Thatcher is a perfect example of feminism in action - she used her education and opportunities to rise, (despite the old-boys network of Whitehall in the 60s & 70s) and run a country. I do not favour her politics in the slightest, but I respect the fact that she achieved Prime Minister status. Her statement is typical of he…	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:58 PM
0	Scientific Evidence Googling produced nothing, link me to the article you're referencing please.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:46 PM
-2	Scientific Evidence It doesn't change the fact that men created those things, but it does change the meaning you seem to be attaching to it. As men (historically) would not allow women to educate themselves to a level where they could create anything, we cannot say that men did it all because they were 'better' than women. We have no way of knowing what women could have achieved back then. Also, all current socialist governments are run by men and men instigated the totalitarian socialist regimes of yore (Mao, Pol …	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:43 PM
-5	Scientific Evidence In matters of evolutionary psychology we are different. However, we are no-longer the neanderthal species that relied entirely upon that mindset to survive. Our brains are more complex than they were historically and our motivations, courtesy of the world in which we now live, are now far more complex than simply hunt-gather-fuck. To base your entire theories on one branch of psychology whilst wantonly ignoring everything that we have learned about human functioning since then, seems willfully i…	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:37 PM
-3	Scientific Evidence Ok, "arguments are based on the belief that men are more logical, whilst women are directed by emotions." Arguments for what? What's the premise? Arguments as in reasoning, as in a lot of users here seem to revert back to the point that "women are bad because they are all emotional and not logical like men" when responding to posts etc. It seems to be the justification for a lot of users opinions. "For example, if I become "emotional" and strike my wife, I go to jail and become yet another DV st…	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:29 PM
0	Scientific Evidence Historically, women were not allowed to attend school to the level required to obtain the knowledge to invent/ practice law etc. The reason so many of those things were done by men in the past is because women simply were not allowed to do them, which drastically skews the numbers when looking at them over the last, say 100 years. We now have female inventors, lawyers, scientists, engineers, mathematicians etc today. I fail to see how that will lead to a collapse in society...	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:15 PM
-5	Scientific Evidence Failed at what? I read a bunch of posts and created a post in response to their statements and assertions. If you're assuming I had an agenda beyond pointing out that the repeated statements that "men are better than women because we're logical & they're emotional" is completely erroneous, then you are wrong.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 02:10 PM
1	Do women not have any imagination? I thought this whole movement centred on men being more logical than women, yet here you are deciding that women as a group are uninteresting based on the answers of two random people. Not the most logical conclusion, given that two 21yr olds do not represent the whole of the female population. I shall presume you're a troll as the guys here generally pride themselves on being smarter and more logical than women.	/r/MGTOW	15/03/19 12:42 PM