TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NovemberTrees Archive

View 1 post and 100 comments by NovemberTrees on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

NovemberTrees/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:00 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Feminism isn't a philosophy or a study. There are no central tenets and it isn't based on an empirical analysis of the world. It's simply a special interest group acting for political change, and it is defined by the change it actually works towards.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:09 AM
-1

It doesn't. When you ask people to rate their quality of life before and after major injuries, there's a brief dip while they learn to cope and then they figure out how to deal with it and life goes on. If they were happy before then they'll be happy in a wheelchair or with a hook for a hand or whatever. There's actually a fair amount of research on it with all the soldiers coming back injured and the bad thing is the PTSD, not the physical injuries. Hell, with current technology you can lose a …
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:49 PM
3

The physical trauma of abuse isn't that significant. Cuts scar over, bones mend and even if you have something really bad like an amputation it doesn't generally effect your quality of life that much. The real issue is the psychological trauma of being abused by a loved one, it's much harder to heal wounds in your head and it tends to represent a huge drop in your quality of life.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:46 PM
1

Ask them why they feel that they are like that.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 02:32 AM
1

He's a traditionally attractive character. Large wide shoulders, smaller hips, that classic triangle. He's anthropomorphic, but that's never been a consistent black mark against a cartoon character.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:43 PM
7

It dropped back to the same levels as two years previous. It's within standard variation for crime in vancouver.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:59 AM
3

The major issue with the privilege debate is that it assumes that gender based privileges are constant. White privilege and economic privilege are static enough in western culture that they work, but gender privilege is highly situational. If someone wants to be a stay at home parent, then they're going to be more privileged if they're a woman. If they wanted to be an executive thirty years ago (this is less true now) then a man will be more privileged. There's a tendency to only view this throu…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:35 AM
1

A lot of it's the old Catholic/Protestant divide. Going back to the middle ages protestant groups were a lot more likely to look down on physical pleasure and they tended to be bigger on shame. Catholics tended to be more along the lines of "better to ask forgiveness than permission".
/r/seduction29/03/12 04:20 PM
1

I'm not sure how a 6 year old can fulfill the mens rea requirement for something like this.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:19 AM
2

The problem with feminism is that there is one word used to describe dozens of things. I don't think anyone here has a problem with the personal philosophy that men and women are equal, for example. There are, however, feminist groups that pursue actions that are against gender equality. I doubt they are deliberately opposing it or anything, it's just that the actual effects of their actions are not helpful.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:21 PM
3

IIRC the only studies that don't show at least some amount of symmetry are Crime Victimization Surveys which have known bias problems.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:04 PM
2

I think the problem is differentiating between "fault" and "consequence". There's always a sequence of events that lead up to the rape that a person with perfect information could avoid, but that doesn't mean that if the person doesn't manage to avoid those events it is their fault.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 12:36 AM
6

Yeah, the biggest problem is that a lot of governments criminalize a lot of the activity around prostitution (pimping, buying, prostitution itself) which tends to cause prostitutes to segregate themselves from law enforcement. This isn't really good for anyone.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:51 PM
1

It's removing tissue with tons of nerves in it that deals with sexual pleasure and it's not their decision. There are no proven benefits and even if there were there's no reason to do something non-reversible like this before they are able to make the judgement on their own.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:35 PM
2

One of the big things to consider is a mens rea requirement. Right now, the primary criteria seems to be whether someone was raped, but the requirement for a crime should be that someone raped another person.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:44 AM
6

One could argue he was preventing them from reaching for one of the hundreds of other weapon-usable implements found in a kitchen. You can shoot someone in the back if you believe they're running for a gun. You could argue that, but it would be pretty pointless since going for a "weapon-usable implement" isn't a valid reason to continue the assault. Legally speaking, if someone said that they were going to walk to their house, grab a gun and shoot you and your family and you kill them, that's ho…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:12 AM
4

There is a principle of proportional response. If a 5 year old swings a foam bat at you then it isn't ok to shoot him in the face even if you think you need to defend yourself. I think he was actually fine in this case because it was two on one. The problem is that he became the aggressor once they were on the ground.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 08:51 PM
-1

No, under common law you have a right to your body and property and you have a duty to protect it. No, you have a right to your body. It's typically illegal to use lethal force to defend property. This is basic stuff anyone who's been through a concealed carry course should know. He had the right to defend himself with a weapon when they were coming at him, but a fleeing subject is not attempting to cause you harm and you cannot attack them. There is an exception for a fleeing subject with a gun…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 08:48 PM
7

He isn't making up an arbitrary rule. There is a standard in law of proportional response for self defense. I think you could make a case that two smaller people attacking you constituted intent to cause loss of life or limb, but without a weapon on their side it's hard to argue that attacking them when they were down was reasonable.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:22 PM
3

If they want a voice hey can go in and take one. One of the comments complained about there being 7 men for every woman, get more women out there and that won't be a problem.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:32 PM
5

Looks like there's evidence he wrote that because the waitress was weight-shaming his girlfriend, who was a recovering anorexic.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:52 AM
1

Please switch to a non-troll account when you're serious-posting.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:18 PM
5

I can't agree. Trans rights issues deserve serious discussion and respect, even if you disagree with what they are saying.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:46 PM
3

Look's like the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 10:53 PM
1

Eh, predator/prey interactions are a simplification of rape, but it is an interesting perspective to hear from.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 03:26 PM
6

That's just bad research. Dangerous jobs do have a premium or you wouldn't have truck drivers in Iraq being paid $80k a year. The big requirement though is that the job have a reasonable barrier to entry, which agriculture doesn't. When you can hire someone who just jumped a fence you don't pay them extra because the job is dangerous. If he had data on pay differences within the same job in dangerous and safe areas then it would actually be a decent argument.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 03:26 PM
3

Yeah, the wealthy and middle class are disproportionately represented in combat roles.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 07:43 PM
2

You generally want to focus special interest groups. It doesn't make sense to call a women's liberation movement masculism and it doesn't make sense to call a mens rights movement feminism.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 07:48 PM
1

I think this subreddit views it as a focused special interest movement.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 08:11 PM
6

This reminds me of the feminist backed anti-pornography laws in Canada that were used almost exclusively by the conservative government to suppress lgbt porn.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:30 PM
38

Yeah, I have to say I'm against this.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:53 AM
1

I am not sure what 'directly related to the sex' means. If he had an infectious disease and didn't tell her, and she got sick as a result of having sex with him, is that 'directly related to the sex'? Because the disease was transmitted through sex? Depends on the disease, but taking HIV as the extreme example, yes. This should be contingent on personal knowledge, but if some chick has sex with me and has HIV then I didn't consent to that. You could just as well argue that her having sex with a …
/r/MensRights17/09/11 03:58 AM
2

It's fairly simple to limit this to things that are directly related to the sex.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 10:28 PM
0

He intentionally did it and her consent was contingent on condom use? Yeah, that's rape. It's not rape if it just fell off or something, but this doesn't seem to be the case here.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 10:26 PM
6

He messed up the definition of gaslighting. It's when you cause someone to doubt their memory or perception, not just "I disagree with your assessment". "I told you earlier to take out the trash" when you were never told that is gaslighting because it forces you to accept their reality and reject your recollection. What he described isn't.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:00 AM
5

Yeah, the basic problem is that being close to a subject almost never brings clarity.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 11:13 PM
23

The funny thing is that r/MR managed to kick all the anti-trans/homophobic stuff out without moderator action (they're over in r/rights4men now IIRC).
/r/MensRights11/09/11 05:38 PM
1

Even beyond sentencing black people are pulled over more often and have a lot of other issues. There's a black ex-cop who actually documents a lot of this stuff by using himself and others as decoys, and a black person in the wrong area will be stopped within an hour or so if they do anything remotely suspicious. White people don't have the same problem. I'd agree that part of the problem black men face is that they are seen as having more of the negative traits society perceives in men but that…
/r/MensRights10/09/11 01:44 AM
0

The simple fact of the matter is that in the west, men are the most oppressed class. And the most important fight is the one to help them. This is slightly off. There are a number of groups like native americans, trans people and the mentally ill that are far worse off than men as a group. I'd also argue that black people are more discriminated against than men because of legal problems. The main thing is that men are often as or more oppressed than women, especially when looking at legal discri…
/r/MensRights10/09/11 12:44 AM
1

Of course. I don't think that there is a significant amount of legal discrimination against women, but there are issues with women's roles in society and entertainment that need to be dealt with.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 03:59 PM
2

Even Women's Studies classes should be held up to a standard of accuracy. My main problem with the Women's Studies class I took was that either the people in charge of the curriculum were idiots or they were liars. One example was that they said the punishment for Adultery in England was death. This was true for the ten years that the adultery act was in place, but it was repealed when the monarchy came back and I haven't seen an act other than that which made adultery punishable by death (outsi…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 06:06 PM
13

The problem isn't your story, it's the message you tacked on at the end. The story was cool and your dad sounds like a great guy but it isn't a response to a position held here. Nobody argues that all dads have problems. It's like going to r/feminism and posting a story about how you went walking in a bunch of dark alleys and nobody raped you so obviously their position doesn't make sense. It's completely off the mark.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 05:36 PM
5

Yeah, I have to agree. It's ok to complain about how people act but the major thing is legal equality.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 12:42 AM
3

It's not anecdotal evidence in support of an opinion, it's a great explanation. We don't need evidence because any man that's in the dating game sees it all the time.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 11:44 PM
5

There was a feminist lesbian who dressed up as a man and tried some things including dating women and she said that it made her hate women in a way that dating men had never made her hate men. The book is "Self-Made Man".
/r/MensRights04/09/11 05:37 PM
1

You're pointing out how the two bell-curves overlap, where a strong woman is stronger than a weak man. That is true, but it ignores the fact that in an apples to apples comparison (male runner vs female runner, male lifter vs female lifter etc) the men are going to be a good 20-30% stronger. Or men's hormones make them violent... The problem with this is that it's true. Ask anyone who's had to inject testosterone whether they've made some stupid violent outburst that made absolutely no sense dir…
/r/MensRights04/09/11 05:30 PM
8

The agreement is usually between the money and talking. She's perfectly within her first amendment rights to talk about it but it would give him grounds to renegotiate the amount of money she is getting. It's like how I could give you a thousand dollars to call me "your majesty", and if you refused to do it I could take you to court. I'm not taking your rights, I'm just expecting an agreement to be honored.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 06:42 AM
4

So is it a yes or is it a no? Why do you keep evading? EDIT: You do realize the point of the question, right? It's just an example of how important correct framing is. By emphasizing the fact that some rapists aren't going to jail you're asking a dishonest question. It isn't reasonable to ask that every single rapist be put in jail. It's impossible to create a system that can do that without harming a significant number of innocents. There's a reason that the criminal justice system is based on …
/r/MensRights03/09/11 06:22 AM
5

It's a fairly simple yes or no question.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 04:30 AM
8

I'd rather have some criminals go free than have a lot of innocent people put in jail. There's a high social benefit to putting a rapist who will repeat in jail, a small social benefit to putting a rapist who will not repeat in jail and a very high social negative to putting an innocent man in jail. The justice system should make every effort to make sure that everyone going to prison is guilty. Is it bad when a guilty person walks free? Yes. Does that mean that you just indiscriminately destroy…
/r/MensRights03/09/11 04:15 AM
6

What does that have to do with false rape accusations? EDIT: Nobody has an issue with legitimate rapists being put in jail. The problem is that there are legitimate issues with rape accusations, from victims not being able to accurately identify who the rapist was (people misidentify someone they've talked to shortly about 60% of the time and when you add alcohol into that there can be serious issues) to questions of whether consent was given (if sex itself is not questioned) to outright lying. …
/r/MensRights02/09/11 10:12 PM
13

Not rape according to the FBI.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 02:29 AM
1

It's not a conspiracy, but there are legitimate issues with having a pregnant woman on a submarine. If she's on a surface ship and she gets pregnant she can just be taken out on an aircraft, but on a long underwater mission you can't leave and you can't stay because there's a lot of issues with chemicals that aren't safe for a pregnant woman.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 02:52 AM
2

We do? I'm a feminist, and I believe that sexual assault is always serious, whether the perpetrator is male or female. Are you willing to say that anyone who believes this isn't a feminist (and call out specific examples)? EDIT: We do? I'm a feminist, and I believe that sexual assault is always serious, whether the perpetrator is male or female. You do realize that this isn't accurately tracked, right? IIRC the FBI doesn't track this and in some areas it's not even a crime.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 08:11 PM
2

I think the most extreme view you'll find commonly supported is that men should be able to perform a "legal" abortion where they can absolve themselves of obligation to the child, but it's not a medical abortion. Abortion is fairly clearly an issue of medical autonomy.
/r/MensRights25/08/11 06:55 PM
1

I generally make a distinction between reasonable people and unreasonable people. The radical side of both MRA and the feminist movement are crazy, but a lot of people don't see the crazy side of feminism because it's uses a lot of the same arguments as feminism, which is seen as "good". Basically, I make a distinction between egalitarian people and sexist people.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:15 PM
9

Nah, she's fine. Some women want an aggressive man, some want a more passive guy. Some men want a submissive woman, some want a girl who will grab them by the hair and slap them in the face (in a consenting environment).
/r/MensRights23/08/11 05:46 PM
2

I don't think she's saying that you support anti-trans ideas, just that you are part of a big umbrella movement that also has anti-trans ideas under that big umbrella. You might not see them but they are there.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:49 PM
3

I won't contest that assertion. However, I was with my manager on a conference phone call recently. On the other side of the call were some clients, and I was introduced to them as "(female name) - our technical expert". The technical questions were directed at my manager, and not at me. People talk to their contact. You're generally expected to fill in technical details. That's the way it's always been with me.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:44 PM
13

Because she's batshit insane.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:40 AM
11

What about a man who gets black-out drunk and has sex with a drunk girl? According to many of these videos he's a rapist. Also, the issue of "enthusiastic consent" is problematic because it's going to be hard to cover the girl who is shy and just nods without making eye contact because getting naked in front of a stranger is kind of embarrassing. The problem is that the single most proactive thing a woman can do to avoid being raped is say "no", and it's something that most people will accept. T…
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:48 AM
7

Yeah, one of the problems is that one of those fruity drinks in a big glass is often the equivalent of 3-6 beers and most people don't know that. Girls need to get that they can't order two long-island iced teas and be fine. Men tend to have a more beer and shots oriented drinking culture that doesn't let you over drink unless you intend to.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:38 AM
4

There are different ways to do jokes. A sandwich joke (or a men only grunt joke) at a party where there isn't a hierarchy and everyone knows it's a joke is one thing. A tasteless joke in a public setting where people are still working out the hierarchy is generally in bad taste because it's an attempt at a power play by undermining someone else for who they are.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 08:45 PM
3

You have two numbers, recantations and "believed false". You can pretty reliably say that the number is higher than the percent of recantations but not what the actual number is.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:31 AM
2

Actually, many states allow women to go topless. I know New York does and I think there are a few others.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 01:11 AM
1

I honestly don't care. Insults are a dime a dozen.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 09:51 PM
6

Would you mind posting the 2% study? I thought the 8% studies were generally at the low end and they usually only count actual recantations, not cases that are likely to be false. EDIT: This is a serious question.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:46 AM
2

Right. The important thing to remember about these is that they're just flat out wrong. Anyone telling you this is either lying or an idiot, and that's not a good thing to know about your professors.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 06:24 PM
4

Here's a few myths you might encounter: "Rule of Thumb": There's a common thing calling it a rule where a man could beat his wife with a stick no wider than his thumb. There's no actual documentation of such a law and we have an unbroken series of documents going back to the magna carta. A Rule of Thumb is the use of the thumb as an impromptu measuring tool when precise measurements aren't needed. "Domestic Violence is the leading cause of Injury for Women": It's generally between 8 and 10, with…
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:23 AM
3

This is a private website so there's no overriding free speech concern and that's just bad shit. Ban it.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 05:59 PM
3

It's he said she said. They made the correct legal call and I don't think it's right to accuse him of anything in the public opinion, but I wouldn't hold this up as a model case either.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:17 AM
2

The problem is that these radfems are coming from an ideology that made sense when there was very real and systematic oppression against women. That's still the case in much of the third world and it makes sense to transplant this stuff over there, but in the western world the gender inequality women face is social to the extent that you can put a movie out with a female lead but it's not going to happen often.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 04:47 AM
1

There are a number of reasonable feminists and a number of really weird MRAs. The hypocrisy of these feminists isn't unique and it should be called out so that the reasonable feminists can see it.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 08:45 PM
6

It's ultimately the guy's choice but he needs to be aware that he is on the hook if anything they decide to go for child support. This isn't fear, it's awareness.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:14 AM
5

That being said, I have heard pound for pound, women are stronger than men (but with less total mass leading generally to less strength). Either way, I'm glad they have to be in the same weight class because if I was still wrestling and I had to wrestle up weight classes... That would have been awful. Women are nearly as strong in the legs (the wider hips are slightly less efficient, but not that much) but the upper body is generally at least 30-40% weaker than a man of comparable body mass and …
/r/MensRights06/08/11 09:32 PM
4

This seems a little misleading. You need the other end (how many men are hired) to make a meaningful judgement.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:15 PM
1

A tall/skinny guy who goes on a 4000 calorie diet and starts lifting is going to gain fat. Say you're skinny at 150lbs, so we'll assume 10% body fat. That means you have 15 lbs of fat. If you gained 50 lbs, and 10 lbs of that was muscle then probably 25lbs is going to be fat. That would put you at 40 lbs of fat at 200 lbs, which would put you at the image below which isn't cut but does have visible muscle definition. http://musclebomb.com/nyc_personal_trainer_blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/anth…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:46 AM
1

The amount of muscle you can gain in a given time frame is well documented. IIRC the theoretical limit for a large, peak level human (age and genetics) working out at the optimal level is 23 lbs of muscle in a year. That's above what has been recorded in any athletes that weren't off their minds on steroids. The initial gains in strength are often misleading. You aren't getting "stronger" physically, you're often just getting better at the act of lifting. I've had people I've trained go from ben…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:18 AM
1

Not really. My brother is in Special Forces, runs marathons, has competed in intra-office competitions to see who could do 1000 pullups the fastest and in general works out at least 4-5 hours a day and he lacks any real muscle definition. Anyone can look like a male model, but for a lot of people it involves supplements or working out in a manner that isn't really that healthy. The whole "Greek God" thing isn't even all that attractive to a lot of women, any more than female body builders are to…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 07:50 PM
2

IIRC one of the major differences is that men do a better job of it. I'd have to check but I think attempted suicide rates are more similar.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:30 PM
2

It sounds like this was more of a mental health issue than anything else.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:58 AM
11

Something Awful is a large forum that has opinions as diverse as reddit.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:27 AM
3

She's actually right, but it does mean that he should be presumed innocent.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:08 AM
1

Women make about the same per hour assuming they have similar education, experience and they're in the same job and non-profit status. Women tend to work fewer hours, they work at non-profits (which pay less), they take more time off, work less dangerous jobs and they go into different jobs. If you control for these things, women make somewhere between a little bit less than men and a little bit more (mostly varying by job).
/r/MensRights28/07/11 04:48 AM
1

Isn't this just a Godwin variant?
/r/MensRights27/07/11 03:35 PM
1

The only problem I have is that there is no evidence of any ulterior motive. She could have been killed by a trans-accepting lover. There's a good chance that this is a matter of transphobia and if evidence comes out that this is the case then I am all for putting it here, but the only facts here point to a simple homicide, which while sad wouldn't be appropriate here if it was a cisgendered man or woman or a child.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 10:22 PM
12

Have you asked rantgrrl, ma99ie or girlwriteswhat if they want to be mods?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:08 PM
1

Most of these are going to be based on trade skills, like welding. They tend to be high paying, afford long hours with overtime and extra pay for extremely hazardous jobs. You also have a lot of jobs that are just really dangerous and pay a lot, like PMC in Iraq for $100k+, Crop Dusting for $50k, Crime Scene Cleaning (picking up skull fragments) for $50k, doing oil rig work for around the same etc. Most of these shitty jobs get you better pay than an average non technical bachelors holder.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 05:25 AM
1

Lawyer up immediately.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:56 PM
6

The issue is that even if the majority of rape claims are true now, if it becomes a valid tactic for harassment then it will be used.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:46 PM
0

Yeah. This is sad, but it seems that the relevant power structures are handling this appropriately. Hopefully it was not a hate crime.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:42 PM
4

The bans haven't been for being racist or terrible people or whatever, it's been for openly trolling. It's not the job of this reddit to force people who make bad decisions into echo chambers (ie from r/mensrights to r/rights4men).
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:31 PM
11

I completely agree, female genital mutilation should be legal.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:12 AM
4

One thing to remember is that there are a lot of visible displays of male power. All of the presidents of the US have been men, males are the more common perspective character in fiction, the overt sexualization of the female body is completely acceptable etc. Those are all real issues. The main thing you need to do is accept those things and then point out that reports of sex crimes against men in war zones and of male victims in domestic violence have been deliberately censored, family rights …
/r/MensRights21/07/11 12:02 AM
1

Probably just for trolling. I'm against most bans, but if someone is performing deliberate and obvious troll attempts then it's pretty reasonable to ban them.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:26 PM
2

AnnArchist is still probably a bit too high on that. The really solid studies I've seen show that false rape reports are higher than most other crimes (in the 7-10% range) but are not the majority of rape cases at all.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:23 PM
1

I find it hard to feel sad about a man making millions of dollars to hawk some back rub in japan. If I was able to pull in a million dollars for a couple days of work (including a trip to japan as "work") I'd be pretty happy.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:33 PM
7

I never got feminist arguments against legalizing prostitution. Making prostitutes criminals just limits their options if they are victims of sex trafficking and makes the pimps much stronger.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 08:02 AM
2

Look up the Duluth Model. It's a DV rehabilitation program based on feminist concepts of the patriarchy. There are a few main points. 1) All domestic violence is patriarchal. As such, all male violence is based on the patriarchal need to control and all female violence is based on combating patriarchal violence. Basically, female violence is good. 2) The rehabilitation basically jsust consists of telling men that they're terrible people. 3) It's pretty much useless as an actual treatment program…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:30 AM
3

One of the issues is that Feminism bases their idea of "equality" on the idea that all or most of the gender norms come from socialization. This has some roots in real science, but it also has a lot of contradictory evidence (there were some cases in the 70s and 80s where infants with genital problems were sexually reassigned and they almost universally associated with their original gender), and it seems to be the reason that many of the second wave feminists are fairly transphobic. A lot of th…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 06:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter