TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NuclearDoctrine Archive

View 14 posts and 193 comments by NuclearDoctrine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
51

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:15 AM
34

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 11:52 PM
17

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:34 PM
14

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:19 AM
9

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 05:53 AM
5

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 05:09 AM
3

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:07 AM
1

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:07 PM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 12:09 AM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 04:10 AM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 04:59 AM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:30 AM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 11:56 PM
0

DebateNuclearDoctrine/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:44 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The first three options are anti-natalist, so they're at best short lived experiments, assuming they gain ground at all. The contractual option had a fully fleshed out version in the science fiction film Soylant Green. Women were literally called "furniture." and attached to properties. Furniture loses value rapidly. And low birth rates have cut off the next crop of manufacturing. So not a viable option due to the limited window of value and the increasingly worst aging inventory. Monogamy will …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:18 PM
1

Zero. I don't give a fuck about understanding the internal lives of women as form of entertainment. If I read fiction for entertainment, it's to give me a maximally self-serving male fantasy. Which is the opposite of female literature.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:05 PM
3

I'll give an answer. The reason is not that there "is no bluepill method." It's that the bluepill method is so incredibly grotesque that admitting to its use undermines its viability. So it's a method that you can use but not talk about. Look at any redpill oriented dating forums and you'll see methodology. There's then debates on what works, what doesn't, implementation, etc. Now look at bluepill forums. You'll see the method instantly once you know what to look for but you'll never see it defi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 09:38 PM
2

The vast majority of men, on here and elsewhere can disqualify finance, personality, etc. Men don't get a first like, match or message on dating apps. Deductively, this indicates it's appearance. Specifically height, face card, hair, build. We can't say it's penis since women can't guess that. You can only reason it's personality or finance if any communication happens period.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 03:31 AM
-1

My edit was for a typo elsewhere. And you didn't answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:13 PM
-3

It is abnormal to be sexually attracted to old people. That's why there's a term for it. This sexual preference is not observed in any other mammals. Only mentally disturbed humans entertain this notion that it's normal. It's DSM-IV adjacent. Clinically used. Menopause is death by a thousand cuts. God doesn't use lightning bolts on old cows. That's not his way. Menopause by itself is sufficient for warning healthy males to avoid sticking their phalluses into the walking dead. God just needs to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 04:08 PM
0

Death by a thousand cuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:55 PM
-12

There's actually a DSM-IV adjacent term called Gerontophilia which indicates attraction to older women. It's a sickness and that's why there's a term for it. Menopause is god's way of giving women a death sentence. It's a programmed shutdown of their body. What remains is something that's biologically non-functional. It's god's way of warning healthy members of society to avoid a diseased animal that needs to be thinned from the herd. God bless.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:33 AM
2

You're correct. Women peak at 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 12:08 AM
1

Did you notice I called you "cupcake" after you called me "dude." Or do your hormones obstruct your vision from seeing your own condescending pretentiousness? I have two words for you, cupcake: Animal Models
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:03 PM
–

The vast majority of women on here have the following qualities: Lesbian, bi, or polyamorous. Not heterosexual, monogamous. Unmarried, childless. Live in coastal liberal enclaves. At, near or post-menopause. Overweight or obese. Subscribes to at least one feminist subreddit. Terminally online. Are on SSRIs with PSSD symptoms. Normal women don't go online to debate about things. Men do, women don't. Normal women have normal lives and don't need this outlet to rationalize what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:59 PM
1

They are extremely ineffective at treating depression and anxiety, in any conventional clinical sense, which is why they're no longer even being market for there things and the patents are being cycled out. The drugs failed their goal. Am I against pharmacology? No. But I'm absolutely against SSRIs that have failed in anything except animal models, which in themselves only show flatlining anhedonia. These models don't predicate actual improvement in well being for humans. You're repeating the bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:46 PM
0

Stop trying to act like this is a smaller issue that it is, just so that you can virtue signal. You're know different than the women who support mtf transitions and then show zero sympathy for women who destransition with genitalia amputation that you encouraged them to undergo in the first place. I know a lot more about this topic than you ever will. Just because you're a woman doesn't mean you're automatically more educated on about how pharmacology effects your endocrine system. I've actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:33 PM
0

I'm a lot more educated than you ever will be on this topic because I've had numerous family members go through it. I found specialists. I've read journals. They all tell me the same thing, it's "unreported" and "nobody wants to talk about it." This is life altering and you're pulling this flippant fucking shit with me? Show some fucking respect to the women who's lives are over as a result of people like you having an agenda to say virtue signal when we've only begun to study the effects of SSR…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:28 PM
1

You need to stop cherry picking statistics like a little girl. It's widely known that this is drastically unreported issue because the group in question is ashamed about reporting PSSD and women are frankly not even aware of it. It's an absolute epidemic on the scale of opiates that is resulting in a wave of female suicides, precisely because women like you have zero willingness to embrace it as a known issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 08:21 PM
-6

I'm not the menopausal corpse that will experience dry vagina, osteoporosis, unwanted facial hair due to lower estrogen and higher androgens, 30% loss of skin elasticity, fat midsection, melasma and solar lentigines in the face, deflated breasts and adult acne. God has programmed you infertile women to become maximally ugly as a sign of what to avoid. Another way to put it? God wants rid the herd of the leftover trash. Enjoy it baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:46 PM
-1

But we can't and shouldn't encourage that anymore than the dishonorable thing we did with men and opiates. That was an absolutely shameful part of American history that we now need to live with. It's an ugly thing to say that women are drug addicts. And few women will accept that it comes from a place of love. So let them hate me for telling them what they know they need to hear. I'm not going to let the Sacklers openly pull this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:27 PM
-1

The fact that you think peer reviewed is anything more than horse trading tells me all I need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:24 PM
-6

According to this very thread by other women (you're own little group) - you could. Go argue with them if you think that didn't happen back then, darling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:23 PM
0

Back by self-reported statistics from narcotics addicts who have such a vested interest in giving up their happy pills, telling the opposite and whom are paragons of taking responsibility for anything self-induced. Yeah no thanks with your "muh statistics."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:18 PM
0

Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) is nothing to be god damn flippant about. PSSD often inflicts permanent effects on a woman’s sexual organs. It transforms previously normal genital sensation into complete anesthesia where the clitoris feels like rubbery dead tissue, the vulva and vagina register as entirely numb. There is zero tactile or erogenous response even to direct touch, penetration, or intense stimulation. It’s accompanied by total elimination of libido and sexual desire likened to ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:07 PM
1

The only form of prostitution that women regularly participate in are male hostess bars in Japan. But that's a niche culture. So studying what works there, is the only valid working model, for studying what would parallel into a feasible sex bot for women. What works there, assuming it's even culturally universal, is the perception of a high status man. This is ironically artificially created. So you would think that offers a pathway to mass replication of that effect. But the effect is maintain…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:53 PM
0

Which is absolutely not normal and something that shouldn't be normalized anymore than taking an opiate pain killer when what you need is a lifestyle change. Women have gone through the exact same thing for 10,000 years. Now suddenly they need a pharmacy subscription drug for the rest of their life starting at 45? Do you understand how insane that sounds? The Sacklers are getting rich off of inducing Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:42 PM
3

The obvious answer is that a majority of millennial women are entering menopause. They're the first generation of women who fucked around and found out what happens when you pursue being a girl boss and wait with sky high standards. The sad irony is that they got this advice from Boomer and Xers whom largely didn't pursue it themselves, or at least not as zealously - which is what we call a luxury belief system (or what some women are starting to come around to seeing at intra-sexual competition…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:37 PM
0

Complete absolute pharma bullshit. You're not going to spin this big pharma female version fo the opiate epidemic on me. It's not normal that a woman requires a drug for a normal hormonal experience that literally every woman on planet earth has gone through for the last 10,000 years. The Sacklers have apparently found a new group of gullible people to become kosher heroine addicts. No wonder so many women have Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) with such a casual drug abusing mentality like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:32 PM
1

If you're an mtf transvestite then you're not a biological woman. And that is my only definition for what a woman is. I will not performatively accept any other definition if you want to talk to me. You have no validity to soap box speak to the biological hormones of biological women. If the child you're raising isn't yours biologically then you're a step mother or father, not a "mother" or "father."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:26 PM
-1

Being SSRI drug addicts with Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) isn't exactly an upgrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:20 PM
1

Look up any statistic you want. The amount of Millennial and Gen Z women on anti-depressants that experience “Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction” (PSSD), is nothing to be god damn flippant about. PSSD often inflicts permanent effects on a woman’s sexual organs. It transforms previously normal genital sensation into complete anesthesia where the clitoris feels like rubbery dead tissue, the vulva and vagina register as entirely numb. There is zero tactile or erogenous response even to direct touch, pene…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:19 PM
-2

There are absolutely zero historical trends of women paying for sex. And a robot is paying for sex. It's paying for sex with a sex slave. Women don't enjoy the pure physical sensation of paying for it and dominating the person you're paying for. Which is why only a minority of women fly to Jamaica to get aids with beach boys. Women want status validation from someone above them. A robot can't give status validation since it's a slave below them. In any case once women go through menopause their …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:07 PM
0

If a woman can't off her ass and cook to prevent herself from taking anti-depressants and having diabetes, then quite frankly - fuck her. She's killing herself and you're the cheerleader pom poming for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 08:46 PM
1

Exercise, cardio, sleep, a multi-vitamin and whole foods aren't anything that any sensible person should be arguing with as a first line of treatment over anti-depressants. The larger niche space for supplements of questionable efficacy is a totally valid take.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 08:44 PM
-10

You're enabling junkies and big pharma cartel is happy to supply women their happy pills. News flash, it's not a default in human nature for 100% of childless women after menopause to become anti-depressant junkies. You're not going to convince me that the very specific sharp uptake precisely around such a demographic and age is ever coincidentally "normal." The vast majority of millennial women are just kosher heroine addicts. And we should absolutely not be normalizing this anymore that we nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:26 AM
-9

Sexbots will replace menopause corpses, so stop being so uppity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:17 AM
-13

The only person who's a loser was the retarded woman who entered that contract. I'm a man, so that makes me a winner. Read the contract dimwit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:15 AM
-29

Marriage is a contract. Maybe women should have read the fine details.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 03:31 AM
-5

The amount of women hitting "involuntary childlessness" resigning themselves to being "happier" alone taking massive amounts of anti-depressants vastly outweighs the prior eras perceived problems. There will absolutely be a wave of suicides by older women, as is currently rampantly growing in Japan. And it's totally unsympathetic to not call out this trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 03:30 AM
5

This is the fallacy of invoking the free market as an absolute arbiter of value, when we absolutely don't live in a free market. We live a vaginocracy where women are too big to fail. Something closer to where GM and Chrysler were artificially propped up. You're not going to tell me we live in a free market when retard women are allowed to shit out unlimited bastards via wedlock and those little monsters don't starve to death as a result of stupid mate selection when there gangbanging baby daddy…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:52 PM
5

A skinny person is almost always relatively more attractive than a fat person however. So it's mostly an assortative match for skinny people to date skinny people. It's not a high standard for a skinny person to date a skinny person, all other attributes being equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:35 PM
5

First, a fat single mother, can get laid whenever she wants by a lazy 8. I've never met a fat single mother that can't get laid. Are you suggesting the opposite? Secondly, why would they make a movement. They're stupid and fat. Only a stupid woman becomes a single mother. And fat women are incapable of any movement whatsoever. They lack energy because they have non-functioning bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:17 AM
13

Most men get zero matches on dating apps. Not even an n of 1. And I have no idea why same-age, non-fat women without children is considered "unreasonable." I do agree fat women and single mothers are a low standard. But most men don't have a buffet of these women lining up either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 03:49 AM
4

Marketing is a non-factor in apps for men. If it was, then every man could go through some course to dramatically improve their like/match rate. Better marketing can take you from disgusting to invisible. But it can't take you from invisible to hot. From a business model perspective, these apps are basically slot machines for men. The reason they're successful is because they're selling a drug, like digital fentanyl, to men. It gives them a temporary high that they'll be chosen. Obviously it's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 03:19 AM
–

Even it it's statistically true, women post as card carrying union members of their sex. They don't disagree with each other in public. So they operate as a unified force.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:47 AM
–

The rule against discussing n-count is clearly designed to protect women. And yes I know there's a pinned post, which is a useless concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:42 AM
–

This sub is peculiar in that it has Stalinist level censorship over specific topics that disproportionately offend women: blackpill, looks, race, n-count. Yet I can guarantee you that if worded carefully I could make a provocative pro date-rape or pro-strangulation post for kinky sex that results in killing women and it would be approved. You don't need to be a good sub to have traffic, just not worse than any others. This sub seems to be at the nexus of allowing the most pro free speech on the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:39 AM
1

Would you say that autistic women are a category that fails this loop and therefore are ironically circumstantially akin to a male who doesn't get the reciprocation game?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:09 PM
–

This will be the new argument that women use against sex robots. They'll switch from "fuck off to your sex bots you losers" to "we must ban them because it will condition them to rape women."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:03 PM
–

Correct. The whole meme about "lazy 8s" exists for a reason. TEA groups wouldn't exist if high value men weren't pumping and dumping women. Desirable men are still men, which means they value quantity and accessibility over quality. Why would a lazy 8 choose a mid woman that requires dinner, date and dancing to nut in when he can just fire up a supermodel that he doesn't need to strategically dump to avoid being a marked man on TEA.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:02 PM
–

Quite a few men are happy to have HR departments not exist, with or without sex, because they're innately misandrist and have fundamentally value estrogen modes of operation over testosterone driven modes of operation. Which is exactly why most startups feature neither women nor HR departments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:58 PM
–

Women say it's a "win/win" but then make videos like this. Apparently men are losers and this is just a "vibrator" and women should be happy these loser men will finally "fuck off" after millenniums once and for all, until the thing looks slightly real and hotter than your average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:49 PM
–

Imminent should stipulate a year or range of years make it an interesting debate. My personal thinking is that it's obvious something akin to a "gen 1" sexbot will be available in the 2030s. That means somewhere between the next 4~14 years. In the big scheme of things this is "immanent." Just to put things in perspective, the existing humanoid companies plan to manufacture as follows: Tesla: 50k/yr by 2026, 1 million/yr by 2027. Given, it's Elon time but these are the low end of estimates and he…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:40 PM
1

To some extent I think this framing of women may be outdated. Things may not be "all as they seem" in woman's land. The largest cohort of women using AI chat bots for support are women. My pet theory on this is that women are selfish in their support even with each other. They all want to receive maximum support. But every woman can't be maximally selfish. So women are turning in droves to AI because even human "besties" have their limits.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:22 PM
2

A facsimile is exactly that. People go to Disney Land every year to interact with things they know are fake. So the question is why would someone pay money for that? The answer is that our brains are agnostic on the source of dopamine. So we don't need "West World" to get there. We just need the dopamine from a synthetic source to exceed whatever meager amount men fail to get from trying with an organic source.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 08:18 PM
2

Thanks for your comment. My "benchmark" isn't actual happiness. It's what women have, most of whom are on a hedonic treadmill that's supplemented with anti-depressants post-menopause (go figure). I think what women have is achievable. Dopamine is dopamine. A person can be spiritually bankrupt and still fly high as a kite. What I'm suggesting is that something akin to men being degenerates in Thailand will become accessible through technology. It doesn't need to even be robots specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:25 AM
1

The perceived contradiction stems from the fact that men distinguish between "acquired" and "innate" standards. Most men view these as two entirely separate categories. From the male point of view, an "innate" standard is fundamentally "high," regardless of what it is because you can't change it. And an "acquired" standard, is fundamentally "low," precisely because you can change it or at least had the opportunity to avoid it. As an example a man can't increase his height or change the "ick" in …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:32 AM
–

Thankfully boomers are literally dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:05 PM
–

It's a moot question. Because virtually zero women will voluntarily be 100% transparent about their n-count or the circumstances around it. Enquiring into n-count invokes the false term "retroactive jealousy." And assessing objective loyalty going forward, despite a promiscuous past, isn't something determined by faith. It's only acceptable validation method for proactively assessing whether such a woman will be loyal and good is a P300 EEG lie detector test, that no woman would willingly partic…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:13 PM
1

From your perspective, what are the alternative explanations?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:49 PM
0

We can add to the fact that the entire "pill" framework was a male intellectual framing. So any woman operating in the pill space to begin with is an intellectual parasite. They didn't invent the blue pill or red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:52 PM
5

No need for the mock outrage. I didn't say it's complicated. My argument is actually very simple. You've been granted life comforts and affordances that previously required literal male testosterone, either directly or indirectly. You wouldn't be happier alone with a 20x testosterone disadvantage if you were living in 1926 rural agricultural America doing back breaking work with zero electricity, sans modern artificial muscle, even if you had every 2026 legal precedent.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:29 AM
3

I've read that women whom fail to do this loop typically lose the friendship. It's considered an obligation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:20 AM
2

You are correct. I didn't mention and it didn't really occur to me because the group of women that typically claim the "happier alone" title are also invariably childless anti-natalists, many of whom, are in menopause. So for this reason I wouldn't add it to the benchmark of something men must reach parity with, since women don't include it in their own happiness standards (which as I noted in the post is a disingenuous form of "happiness" anyways). That being said, I'm not sure the about the ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:18 AM
2

This isn't what the consensus of roboticists and researchers at the intersection of this topic forecast. Most of whom think it will be a net negative on society and aren't invested in its fruition. You're welcome to make a persuasive counter forecast.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:08 AM
1

Let's use dopamine as a framework to evaluate this. If we're agnostic about the source of dopamine then the only pass/fail test is sufficient stimulation. This is why men watch pornography and take drugs. They are partially effective surrogates. The fact that the thing isn't real doesn't change that the lizard brain still received dopamine.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:00 AM
2

Understanding, sympathizing and empathizing are three different things. Understanding means you can predict how a woman will act. In other words if you were to put women inside a laboratory rat maze and then bet on outcomes, most men could put their money where their mouth is and profitably predict what women will do. Sympathizing means you agree with what they should do. If I put mouse in inside a snake cage, even if I can predict what it will do, it doesn't mean I sympathize with it. Empathy m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:00 PM
1

Remember that men have 20x more testosterone than women. Your average 80 year old man has more testosterone than a woman ever will. Women all experience accelerated osteoporosis with menopause.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:42 AM
1

Not everyone's meant to be a parent. But everyone is meant to breed. Inverted pyramid structures don't work. You should really think about an answer to your question "Who will take care of you when you're old??" because the baby boomers will not be your blueprint. Your worst case scenario is not lacking the money to be put in a nursing home, it's a world that has literally no young people to staff a nursing home even if you do have the money. That's your future when women opt out of breeding in …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:51 AM
1

The vast majority of people throughout history considered their children to be their social security and welfare in old age. The fact that many modern children will now put their parents in a home or let them starve is more a referendum by the same individualist streak suggested by the Negatives of this post. I know quite a few elderly people who would be in very serious trouble without their children. And I don't think the extra retirement savings from not raising them would cancel that out. Le…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:46 AM
–

I’m a nice man who says nice things to nice ladies. Most women practically melt with gratitude when I call them sweetheart because it’s the first genuine kindness they’ve heard in years, it brings out the little girl in them who always wanted to be treated with respect. My uncles and I make it a point to be nice to every woman we meet, whether she “asks for it” or not. In our ethnic community we don’t need your permission to be decent. You don’t get to swoop in and impose your apartheid style re…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:37 PM
–

Nah, sweetheart, oh wait, that’s the exact endearment my uncles and cousins have used for their wives and daughters for generations in our ethnic community. But sure, go ahead and police our ethnic ways as “condescending and sexist,” little lady. What’s next, you gonna claim calling you a lady is sexist and condescending too? Maybe you aren’t a lady, you’re certainly not acting like one. And that “go back to your homeland” line you keep doubling down on? Jesus Christ. Let me paint you a picture …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:43 AM
–

Sweetheart, that’s precious. You’re out here screaming “it’s not racist, it’s culture!” while frantically clutching your “go back to your homeland.” Classic move, every time someone calls out the xenophobic dogwhistle, suddenly it’s “just culture, bro.” Let’s be real about your racism you’re pretending isn’t here. My posted literally pointed to ultra Orthodox Jewish families who were born and raised in New York City for generations, actual Americans, as Western as it gets. You’re the one implyin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:45 PM
-1

That's adorable. You just wrapped your entire post in “Western culture this, Western values that” while telling me to “go back to my homeland.” Real liberal of you and totally not racist. Let’s talk “Western,” since you’re so obsessed. Nothing is more stereotypically Western than Mennonites, plain dressing, Bible thumping, born and raised in the heartland of America and Canada, who still do courtship the old way. Elder women (moms, aunts, church matriarchs) quietly vet, guide, and match. Zero co…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:10 PM
2

To push back a little bit on your influencers comment, to an extent that's valid. But the nature of influencers is also that you can't sell something there isn't a demand for. So in a way, regardless of their ulterior motive, these pulpets sort of act like a mirrors for a consensus opinion already in the marketplace. And to that extent I don't think RooschV was any different, he sold a different idea to a different market.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:12 PM
2

That is the public statement. But my cynical view was that it was a bit of column A and column B.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 08:17 PM
2

If you're saying vegan women don't date vegan men, I can speculate that the less appearance driven the sub-culture is the less this formula works. Vegans and non-vegans pretty much look alike. Same goes for "casual Christians" and run of the mill atheists. But a neo-nazi with a swastika on their forehead is taking an extreme general dating penalty in exchange for an obvious appearance to another in-group.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 12:44 AM
5

Well, to frame your response in the context of this post, you're essentially holding the "orthodox red pill" position. And whether that position is right or wrong, it's not a position that pretty much any Gen Z takes seriously or pushes today.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:01 PM
15

That's actually a really bad analogy. Because it's been well documented in dating that you have a higher chance of finding a partner if you belong to an extreme sub-culture or are a "fish out of water." As an example "punk rockers" used to only date "punk rockers." The same goes for men who travel to foreign countries where they look nothing like the general population and tracked down by "gaijin hunters." You, being trans, automatically places you into a sub-culture where you have an advantageo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 08:43 PM
11

It's cultural commentary. Were you expecting a double blind laboratory test to prove an ambiguous take? On a serious note, what are you actually expecting as proof? I gave an opportunity to push back. Show me a single Gen Z male that has the same following/clout as RooshV or ToddV that is pushing "Orthodox Red Pill".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 08:31 PM
5

Like I said. I could be wrong. I asked for someone to point out a single Gen Z male that has the same following/clout as RooshV or ToddV that is pushing Orthodox Red Pill. They simply don't exist and that's a reasonable bellwether to start the conversation. Every top Gen Z male with any influence is one of the above mentioned categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 08:28 PM
–

I think Orthodox Red Pill is basically dead to Gen Z, which was the presumption that "game" alone was a singular determining factor in success with women. Pretty much no Gen Z today espouses a point like that, which was the status quo for people like RooschV and ToddV (Real Social Dynamics). In short, looksmaxxing killed Orthodox Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:10 AM
1

There are several libertarian approaches that would indirectly solve this through completely neutral market mechanisms that don’t have any “agenda” at all. These libertarian approaches would negatively affect women’s “rights”, but those rights aren’t considered “rights” in a libertarian society to begin with. They don’t remove women’s “rights” so much as reset things to an even playing field where women will naturally perform worse and therefore have a wider catalog of men who perform “better” t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:56 PM
1

You just sprinted straight past the actual point and built a strawman out of forced child marriages and “buying girls for cows” so you don’t have to deal with the real conversation. Nobody here is talking about those abominations. We’re talking about the functional arranged setups that have existed for centuries, the ones still running today in ultra-orthodox Jewish communities and plenty of mosques, where elder women do all the vetting. It’s been female controlled the entire time, and those exa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:14 AM
2

Nah. You’re still pretending arranged marriages are some evil patriarchal cage where women get “enslaved” to men they hate. Reality check, champ. Women got the full menu and the veto power. The women screaming “slavery” aren’t mad at the system. They’re mad because the data is brutal. So yeah, keep calling it “enslavement.” It’s easier than facing the fact that left to their own devices with maximum freedom, they make themselves measurably less happy, every single time. Go off, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:10 AM
1

It cannot be a standard, if definitionally, it doesn't exist. If your standard is for a man to not watch porn and you simultaneously assert that this is impossible, then it cannot be a "standard." It can be a "wish," a "dream," a "hallucination," or a "demand" that's no different from what a child says irrationally to it's parent e.g. "I'll only eat icecream." It's not something that lives in the same category as ISO, IEEE, IETF, NIST where standards are designed within stringent realms of plaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 08:09 AM
1

They don't need to defend their demands. When a child throws a tantrum for something that's impossible, you obviously just treat them as an underdeveloped brain that doesn't understand how reality works yet. Ditto for adult creatures that imitate children. Now if you're child's standard for food is eating old raw pork because he likes it, he will meet reality head on. Any false standard, applied anywhere in the world, that has consequences is quickly deemed "indefensible".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:31 AM
1

First, it's not a standard. It never was. Never will be. Second you women do need to defend your standards. You better get to it. Right quick. See what I just did? I made a demand. I can't predictably control whether you'll do that or not. Because that would be a standard if I could. Think about it this way. When you're getting a loan to buy your house. And you roll with tattoos, smoking, questionable wardrobe choice and work at a tattoo parlor, you're damn straight you have to defend your stand…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:46 AM
1

You just read “standard” and sprinted straight into the dumbest possible strawman like it was an Olympic event. Nobody, not me, not the NIST guys, not reality, is saying women are robots or that anyone should force you to date within some cold “tolerance band” against your will. You have all the free will in the world. You can desire a 6’5” childfree millionaire dog whisperer who meshes perfectly with your soul, shares your politics, has zero baggage, and still chooses exclusive monogamy with yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:38 AM
1

“Holy shit, NIST and IEEE, LMAO, even my autist husband knows…” That’s the intellectual equivalent of plugging your ears and yelling “but emotions!” the second someone uses a word with an actual definition. Nobody said humans are robots. The principle that a standard has to be achievable, testable, and repeatable isn’t some autistic engineering fetish, it’s how reality works in every single domain where grown adults actually get results done. A job posting that says “must be able to lift 500 lbs…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:34 AM
1

I see you cherry picked the quotes you could twist while sprinting past the rest like your ass was on fire. Classic. You really just typed “A standard in dating has nothing to do with ‘achievable’” with a straight face? So according to your redefinition, I can set a “standard” for a 9-foot-tall, trillionaire, virgin chef who reads my mind and never ages, and as long as I stay single while screaming it’s my sacred right, it magically remains a valid standard because “it might be achievable someda…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:28 AM
1

That was a masterclass in moving every single goalpost while pretending you’re just being reasonable. First, the “I just want a guy who does laundry” opener? Cute little gaslight. Nobody here is triggered by basic adulting. We’re laughing at the women whose “basics” quietly balloon into 6’+, six figures, six inches, matching politics, zero baggage, perfect emotional mesh, and still dying to commit exclusively while having endless options. You can downplay it all you want, the dating apps, the bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:17 AM
1

Completely sidestepped the actual point like it’s radioactive. Nobody here is saying you can’t want whatever the hell you want or that anyone should force you to date a single soul. That’s not the conversation. The conversation is why so many of you insist on labeling your unachievable fantasy checklist a “standard,” then act shocked and indignant when the market laughs in your face for years, all while screaming “there are no good men” like it’s some cosmic conspiracy instead of basic math. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:10 AM
1

Show me a single "standard" from ISO, IEEE, IETF, NIST that doesn't exist in reality. You'll see it's an oxymoron to have a "standard" that also cannot exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:05 AM
1

Sounds like you’ve cracked the code to never being wrong about anything. Imagine an overweight dude who says his standard for a wife is a 22 year old virgin supermodel who cooks gourmet meals, never nags, makes six figures, and worships his gaming chair, all while he refuses to lose the gut, build any frame, or bring anything to the table except “I’m not settling.” When he’s still single at 45, raging on Reddit about “there are no good women,” you’d call him a delusional loser, right? But accord…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:49 AM
1

Talk about the laziest, most limp dicked “gotcha” I’ve ever seen. I didn’t “change the definition” of anything. I laid out precise, testable ones that actually survive contact with reality. A standard has to be achievable and repeatable. If it isn’t, it’s a demand wearing a fancy hat. That’s not redefinition, that’s calling bullshit on people who treat their fantasy checklist like it’s the same thing as “I want a guy taller than me who doesn’t ghost after sex.” So sure, go ahead and play your li…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:31 AM
-3

This is the exact scripted deflection I expected the second someone shines a light on the emperor’s new clothes. Nobody, least of all me, is telling you you’re not “allowed” to want whatever the hell you want. You’re free to quietly filter for a 6’4” childfree millionaire dog dad who votes exactly like you, has zero baggage, and somehow still chooses exclusive monogamy with you despite having a soft harem of better options on speed dial. Freedom of association cuts both ways. The actual point yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:10 AM
-2

Actually it does. That's the basis of a standard. Lets switch contexts, please show me a "standard" from ISO, IEEE, IETF, NIST, that is both a "standard" and "unrealistic". No such thing exists, it's an oxymoron.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 01:59 AM
-6

You don't get to pick and choose what they're called. We can start there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 01:56 AM
5

I'm not going to sit here and listen to whatever this is. Why do the moderators let women post such exaggerated, self pitying “woe is me” bullshit? It violates the rules. See side bar. The reality is that most women deliberately select low life thugs, the kind with “fuck you” practically tattooed on their faces. Not only do they pursue these men, they clearly derive some twisted satisfaction from it, evidenced by their inability to turn a door knob. Do women really need to be treated like helple…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:13 AM
-1

Because the name of the subreddit has a big word in it called "debate". That is the explicit reason for why you're supposed to be here. The name of the subreddit isn't called "purplepillagreement" or "purplepilldiscussion". Even in threads in a debate subreddit that are further explicitly tagged as "debate", you still see zero shredding between women. Women who are incapable of debating other women on this subreddit should be banned on sight. They don't belong here. They haven't earned their pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:33 PM
0

Show me the last five comments on this subreddit where you ripped apart another woman. Better yet, show me the last five comments where any woman ripped apart any other woman. I pre-emptively call crickets.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:32 PM
0

Men rate as more disagreeable in general. It's not a flaw in a subset of men. We're naturally independent. It's women that need to be trained to openly disagree with other women and even then lack the cajones to do it. That's why there's zero arguments between women on here, it's honestly pathetic. So I'll take my balls and keep being a man. Doing man stuff. Like a real man. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:06 PM
-12

Everything can be an act of submission, which is a step beyond simply "easy going". Submissiveness has a distinctly different flavor that is most obvious in women that actually practice as a Submissive in sex. That being said, having a designated partner "have the last word", is required for relationships to work. Each decision, big or small, cannot be a stalemate. That's ineffective. That's how it's always been. Modern relationships are simply an attempt at having two roommates cohabit and effe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 05:05 AM
-7

The "hub bub," as you so quaintly put it, is about demographics and genetics dictating the future. And this "they can teach others their views, pass along their wisdom and all be hunky dory"? Is peak blank slate delusion, straight out of Option 2 in the essay you apparently skimmed. You think humans are empty vessels just waiting for your enlightened lectures to reprogram them. That is empirically bankrupt. Twin studies from the Minnesota Registry, decades of data, heritability at 0.6 average, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:31 AM
-6

Blaming me for "blaming millions" based on rock solid trends? That's rich. Some people are apparently allergic to foresight. This is a wake up call that some people are too oblivious to appreciate. This is not a fairy tale about some vague "future that hasn't happened yet". Demographic math is as predictable as gravity. I'm the good Samaritan here, dropping this truth bomb now, while there's still time to course correct because once the tide turns, it'll be too late for regrets and "whoops, didn…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:18 AM
-1

First, let’s examine "fewer liberals suffer" arithmetic. Sure, in a 90/10 conservative dystopia, the raw count of liberal women plummets. But "smaller" doesn't mean insignificant in absolute terms. We're talking 10% of a billion plus global population. But let's drive this home with real world groups. Take the Uyghurs in China, a minority ethnic group, about 1% of the population, herded into camps, culturally gutted, and "reeducated" because they lack the demographic clout to fight back. So what…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:07 AM
-7

I don't. This is a cold, calculated takedown of a worldview that's as cowardly as it is hypocritical. Liberal women have been handed the ultimate equalizer. The power to shape tomorrow through their own damn choices. Equal opportunity? Check. But instead of seizing it, they've traded values for lattes and "me time," all while preaching autonomy like it's gospel. I'm just the messenger exposing the scam, proving that women’s so called progressive paradise crumbles under its own selfish weight. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:45 AM
-7

Let's cut the naive bullshit. If someone actually gives a damn about a future where their precious liberal values, autonomy, equality, all that jazz, don't get steamrolled into oblivion, then yeah, it damn well is their responsibility to reproduce. They're not just opting out, they're surrendering the battlefield to conservatives who are breeding like it's their divine mission, locking in their hereditary worldview while they sip a soy latte and pretend demographics don't matter. And if they see…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:37 AM
0

First off, heritability isn't 100%. Even at 74% for informed voters (which you conveniently glossed over), that leaves a solid chunk, up to 40% on average, who deviate from the family script. Liberal outliers in conservative clans will be the ones grinding under the boot of "traditional values." Think restricted abortions, rolled back LGBTQ rights, and whatever fresh hell the theocrats cook up next. They'll suffer precisely because they still exist, albeit as minorities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:23 AM
0

You seem to be of the opinion that I disagree with you that women are choosing between staying single or not. This is an irrelevant question and I have no idea why you've tunnel vision focus on this. And for the record I haven't even stated that I disagree with it. The point of this thread is for women to understand what men perceive as being settled for. You don't seem to like the answer. It's possible for possible for: a) A woman to be exhibiting a choice between single or not. b) A woman simu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:17 AM
0

By definition a choice requires multiple options available to elect. You either agree with that or you don't. Non-participation doesn't qualify as an option. If it did then anything could qualify as being multiple choice by default of non-participation. But this would be a ridiculous framework that nobody would take seriously for anything else. Let's see just how ridiculous this framing is. If you only have one cell phone carrier in your area are you exercising a choice between two vendors or is…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:27 AM
-7

Which means they are settling. That's the word you should be using. "Settling". But you refuse to own it. Choosing to "not be single" is not a choice between "man a" and "man b". You cannot choose from an option of one. This is equivalent of saying that you choose to subordinate yourself to a monopoly that price gauges you. You probably also made a choice on what wear for your date. The fact that you made a choice from your wardrobe and then arrived at a restaurant where they only serve one meal…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:04 AM
-2

Let's define the words "choice", "chosen" and "settled". A "choice" is when there's multiple male suitors. It cannot be a “choice” if you’re not rejecting some men in order to have “chosen” another man. A false equivalency that women make is the “choice” between a woman being “single” or “not”. And this is where we get the term “settled”. A very large number of women “settle” for leftover men after having no ability to exercise any “choice” at all. A man is “chosen” or “settled” directly proport…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 11:41 PM
2

Fair point. Female intrasexual competition is absolutely inherent, baked into our evolutionary wiring, and you're spot on for calling it out. Respect to you for seeing the primal roots without the fluff. Now where I disagree. Feminism isn't separate from it. It's the sleek, modern upgrade. It’s the cultural psyops that weaponizes that competition through "empowerment" narratives and luxury beliefs for mate suppression. Think of it as the brake pedal doctrine dressed in girlboss armor, where lead…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:26 PM
0

Actual intelligent women like evolutionary psychologist Dr. Dani Sulikowski and writer Helen Andrews have been dissecting this female civil war for years. If a man's take triggers your defenses, try swallowing a woman's version for once. Or does that shatter the narrative too?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 06:00 PM
0

You're one of the few sensible people whom understands this. Men are the gate keepers of this sexual paradigm and the current order could end over night. The answer to your question is that men have historically done this. Marriage has always been a restriction placed on higher men collectively by lower men. It's not a coincidence that every civilization that has ever existed arrived at this male sexual union that imposed rules internally on men. The action you're demanding is called Enforced Mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 04:27 AM
-3

Your defense is a masterpiece of self soothing delusion, cloaked in the rhetoric of virtue but rooted in the same perilous naivety that leaves one staggering homeward at 2am, inebriated and solitary, only to recoil at the predictable ambush. Willful ignorance isn't a noble bulwark against "misandry", it's a cognitive defect, a failure to model the adversarial incentives simmering in the male underclass, where resentment festers into calculated predation. Assuming "random men" are "civilized huma…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 03:52 AM
-3

Spare me the performative enlightenment, as if feminists and progressives have cornered the market on grasping realpolitik's darker arts. The truth is, a sizable swath of women. Yes, even the ostensibly "aware" ones, remain blissfully incapable of modeling the raw, spite fueled calculus at play here. They trot out precious statistics, attempting to "reason" with men who've long since transcended self interest, men who'd gleefully vote in a legal equivalent of ISIS just to watch your world crumbl…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 03:38 AM
-4

The naivety on display is endearing. You say women aren't "total bitches" presuming baseless misogyny, but the act of genuinely asking reveals not malice on their part, but a breathtaking intellectual vacancy, a cognitive void where situational awareness should reside. These are the archetypes who, in their bubble of unexamined privilege, saunter home intoxicated and solitary at 2am, oblivious to the shadows encroaching, only to feign shock at predators doing what we all know happens. It's not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:31 AM
1

Your assertion collapses under elementary scrutiny. Any politician who abolishes abortion is, by axiomatic necessity, pro-male, irrefutably so. This maneuver is not mere policy, it is a calculated reclamation of biological asymmetry, tethering women inexorably to the consequences of reproduction while emancipating men from equivalent chains. Mandating proof of wrongdoing for marital dissolution is another. Such reforms ensnare women in protracted legal battles, deterring separations and fosterin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:15 AM
–

U... seem to have skimmed right past the core thrust... missing the forest for the trees in a way that's... almost endearing in its simplicity. The examples weren't tallying up some petty scorecard against "thousands" of anything... no, U see, they spotlight a uniquely insidious flavor of viciousness. Intimate, weaponized "nurturance" twisted into betrayal that echoes through everyday female dynamics... far beyond rare outliers. It's the relational rot... that defines broader intrasexual malice …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:01 PM
–

You've grasped the essence of "what" I'm arguing. Women inherently resist living under genuine female led governance. I'm not sure the "why" came through fully, so let me articulate it more precisely. The core reasons boil down to three fundamental dynamics rooted in evolutionary and social patterns: Female intrasexual conflict tends to be covert and insidious, fostering an atmosphere of perpetual paranoia and unpredictability. This contrasts sharply with male aggression, which is typically over…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 06:14 AM
1

Let’s behold your "angels" in caregiving. Elizabeth Wettlaufer, was a Canadian nurse, who injected insulin into elderly women such as Clotilde and Albina Adriano (sisters), Gladys Millard, Helen Matheson, Mary Zurawinski, Helen Young, and Maureen Pickering for the thrill, of basking in sympathy while their lives drained. Or we have Jane Toppan, the "Jolly Jane" nurse, who dosed her foster sister and Davis daughters with morphine and atropine, aroused by their dying gasps, all under the guise of …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:56 PM
-7

You disagree? Big shock. Men murder men more overtly, sure, but that's tribal warfare with endpoints. Females' intrasexual venom, per Benenson and Sulikowski, poisons kin without mercy or closure. History's battlefields prove that men channel violence productively, building empires, while unchained harpies devolve into Zimmerman's blood feud hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:26 PM
-2

Oh, spare us the cavewoman fantasy. You quote "staring back from sixty years" as if cherry picking a phrase absolves your brain from engaging with the actual thesis. Then you pivot to this "meritocracy since caves," as if human societies weren't forged in the fires of male dominance, where sheer balls built empires while women schemed in the shadows. Meritocracy? Spare me the utopian bullshit. If society's a gender blind merit machine since the Stone Age, then explain why every major civilizatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:18 PM
–

Women are autonomous, sure. Until it means killing your own fully human baby daughter. Suddenly she's just an appendix. Thankfully that's when it becomes your body, my ballot box.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 09:23 PM
-2

That's the brochure slogan every parasite recites to justify the grift. "Feminism is about equality" translates to women extracting maximum benefits from male labor, infrastructure, and protection while contributing minimum effort and screaming "oppression" whenever accountability knocks. You don't want equality. That demands segregation, women ruling your own isolated empires, rising or rotting on pure female competence, no male worlds to raid. But parasitism pays better when the host stays ali…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:34 PM
-5

That's a lot of projection for someone whose entire ideology boils down to parasitism hiding behind "equality" cosplay. You don't want a middle ground, you want to suck the patriarchy dry. Extract all the benefits, male built infrastructure, protection, resources, while whining about "oppression" and dodging the actual work of governing or sustaining anything yourselves. That's why "smash the patriarchy" never fully happens. You need the host breathing so you can keep draining its veins dry. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 05:28 PM
-10

Your hysterical wall of text cope is the exact delusional fiction I warned about. A post-hoc rationalization from a woman who knows, deep in her gut, that the old pact is dead and her side just got exposed as the greedy traitors who blew it up. You paint the pre-revolution world as one endless rape and beat festival because that’s the only way you can sleep at night justifying what your spiritual foremothers did, namely shooting their own hotter sisters in the back so mediocre 5s and 6s could te…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:49 PM
-5

Spare me the faux outrage. Nobody said women are “property”. I said pussy robbery because that’s exactly what happened. The “property” you’re hallucinating isn’t women, it’s the natural order of assortative mating, where prime women locked down prime men and average men still got wives, families, and a future. Your spiritual foremothers shot that system in the head so 5s and 6s could get temporary alpha pumps. As for “mediocre holes”, yes, darling, that’s precisely what we’re referring to. The e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:33 PM
1

Listen closely, princess. You’re claiming that if women had simply been allowed into labs sooner, they would have invented the pill, reliable condoms, vacuum aspiration, and the rest of the technological scaffold that makes modern feminism possible. Yet the moment women were granted unrestricted access to education and STEM fields, starting decades ago, these same women overwhelmingly chose not to enter the exact disciplines that produce those technologies. If the female genius for hormonal cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:49 PM
0

Spare me the Hallmark card definition. Nobody’s buying the “same rights, freedoms, and choices” fairy tale anymore, least of all the women actually living the feminist lifestyle. If feminism were truly about abstract equality, it would manifest identically in every society that adopts the idea. It doesn’t. It only flowers where specific male technologies exist to neutralize pregnancy, shield women from physical labor, and subsidize their economic participation. Remove those technologies and the …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:02 PM
-1

Because some men here still possess the rare ability to observe reality without filtering it through the desperate need for female approval. You, on the other hand, reflexively perform the ritual sigh, “Why are the men like this?”, the modern equivalent of throwing your cloak over a puddle. It signals nothing except your eagerness to be seen as one of the “good ones,” the safe one, the one who parrots the approved disappointment so the women watching feel validated and warm. Notice you didn’t en…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:45 PM
1

No threats here, just cold observation of material reality. The infrastructure you rely on for your lifestyle was built by men, is maintained by men, and can be rerouted by men without a single raised voice. When it quietly shifts, you’ll feel the change long before any “spooky” boogeyman shows up. Keep the strap if it makes you sleep better. Reality doesn’t need permission to correct itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:41 PM
0

The claim isn’t that zero women ever touched a pipette or wrote a line of code in these fields. It’s that the overwhelming architecture, invention, scaling, and maintenance of the critical technologies enabling modern feminism via synthetic hormones, reliable latex barriers, vacuum aspiration devices, sanitation systems, antibiotics, office automation, global supply chains, and dating algorithms were conceived, designed, prototyped, industrialized, and sustained by men. The exceptions are exactl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:38 PM
-1

Respectfully, brother that analogy is seductive on the surface, but it doesn’t hold up under real scrutiny. There simply isn’t a valid parallel to draw here. Slavery, for example, was a self sustaining institution rooted in exclusively in cultural consensus. It required no synthetic chemicals, no global supply chains, no continuous technological subsidy. Feminism is the photographic negative. Lockean rights have survived plagues, famines, dark ages. Feminism has never survived a single serious d…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:33 PM
5

The term has always been relative. Even if you go on incel forums, there's disagreement. I'll return to this in a moment. First let's kill a few elephants in the room. I think it's no coincidence that the term "incel" originated in the US and that that the US is also the most prohibitive country towards legal prostitution in the world. This undermines the "availability" in your question. Yes prostitution is legal in Nevada. It's illegal everywhere else. But even if that's the case, you may say "…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 10:24 PM
1

So two feminists told you Bonnie Blue is “predatory toward young men.” Ok. Let’s try to treat this charitably. If we’re going to take this as a serious, good faith critique. Then I think it’s a reasonable question to ask those two feminists why have Brandi Love, Cory Chase, Reagan Foxx, Cherie DeVille, and Sally D’Angelo successfully spent fifteen years filming “stepmom bangs barely legal teen son” scenes with the exact same 18-22 year old demographic and received less death threats and less “pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 09:55 PM
0

Scott Galloway is a fucking coward mothefucker who ain't diagnosing shit. He parades Gen Z bros dropping out of college like flies, drowning in despair, cocks shriveling to dust while women lap men in the rat race and what in the fuck does he do? The parasite tiptoes around refusing to say the word “women” and then has the fucking nerve to lecture us about economic anxiety and algorithm addiction. He knows damn well who pulled the trigger on Gen Z. He just won’t say it because then he can’t lick…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:54 AM
1

So let’s recap your brilliant defense. For twenty years, 40, 50, 60, and 70 year old women have been pounding 18-22 year old “stepsons” on camera in one of the single most searched categories on the entire internet. Billions made, zero death threats, zero bodyguards, zero feminist outrage. Your excuse? “Golly gee, I’ve never heard of them.” The same women who can write 10,000 word think pieces about Pornhub’s terms of service somehow suffered a collective stroke the moment the #1 category involv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 10:21 PM
–

Already did, took the 20 year old out on her leash this morning. She’s still catching her breath on the balcony while I sip coffee. You should try fresh air too, might help with that jealous cat lady odor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:36 PM
2

I wrote one post about feminist hypocrisy. You’ve spent your time chained to my replies because Bonnie Blue’s tight, millionaire making, globally desired vagina is currently getting more pipe (and better pipe) in a single afternoon than your neglected, cobweb coated, roast beef curtain will see in the next decade of lukewarm Tinder dates with guys who close their eyes and picture her face the second they’re inside you. Her vagina books private jets. Yours can’t even book a second date. Hers has …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:30 PM
2

Because feminists spent sixty years screaming that women have an inalienable, shame proof right to fuck whoever, whenever, however many, in whatever hole, for whatever reason (or no reason at all). Full stop. Then Bonnie Blue shows up and actually uses that blank check on the men feminists silently agreed were supposed to stay in the sexual leper colony forever. Which is your mid boyfriend, your aging husband, your little brother who can’t get laid, the orbiting nice guys, the 5'6" accountant wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:08 PM
–

Says the one whose therapist just raised the rate because even she’s tired of hearing you pretend anyone wants to own your used up mileage.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:57 PM
–

The only leash you’ll ever feel is the one your cats use to drag you to the food bowl. Stay mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:55 PM
1

Aww, the hamster wheel in your head spun so hard it came out as a personal hygiene lecture. Bonnie’s busy getting rich fucking the guys you pretend don't exist, while you’re here sniffing Wi-Fi for incel pheromones. Stay mad, stay poor, stay unfucked (unlike those guys). The smell of cope is stronger than any basement. Touch grass. Or a man. Either would be an upgrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 05:52 PM
0

Ah yes, the smoking gun. Fucking 18 year olds is evil when Bonnie done it. Meanwhile, the entire MILF category (Brandi Love, Cory Chase, Reagan Foxx, Cherie DeVille, Sally D’Angelo, etc.) has been banging 18-22 year old “stepsons” on camera for fifteen straight years, complete with titles like “Hot Mom Fucks Her 18 Year Old Son’s Best Friend” and “Stepmom Drains Virgin Boy Dry.” Bonnie’s mortal sin? She skipped the pretend script, flew to Spring Break, and fucked the real life versions of those …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:28 AM
-1

Let’s clear this up before the goalposts sprint any further. Bonnie Blue is 26. The “young men” she films with are 18-22, all required to show government ID on camera, and half of them fly themselves to whatever country she’s in just to get a turn. That’s the exact same male age bracket every MILF/step-mom porn actress on Pornhub has been banging for the last decade while being praised as “cougars.” Where’s the outrage for: Brandi Love (47) doing “stepson” scenes with 18 year old performers? Cor…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 09:16 AM
0

The “end goal of feminism” was never explicitly written down, because the moment you write it down, someone like Bonnie Blue shows up, reads it literally, and starts cashing eight figure checks while your entire gender tries to hire a hitman. But let’s go ahead and pretend there’s still ambiguity. Every major feminist organization, every women’s studies syllabus, every blue check influencer since 2012 has repeated, on loop: “Sex work is work.” “My body, my choice.” “Slut shaming is violence.” “N…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 07:15 AM
-8

Anecdotal brunch gossip from your five closest friends doesn’t override the armed bodyguards she’s had to hire because thousands of women are actively trying to murder her. She’s not “sad and scared.” She’s rich, laughing, and buying villas while your entire gender floods her inbox with acid attack fantasies and rape wishes. The “I’m just worried for her, poor broken bird” routine is the same condescending cope feminists always use when one of their own ideology’s monsters escapes the lab and go…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:55 AM
-5

Sure thing, Sherlock. The men who fly across oceans and wait in line for hours to fuck her are apparently also spending their post nut clarity creating thousands of rainbow flag, “future is female” burner accounts just to send her death threats and call her a traitor to women. Brilliant conspiracy. Truly the work of 007 level intellect after busting three times in a hotel room. Meanwhile, in reality, not a single feminist of note has defended her. Wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:46 AM
-1

We can stop pretending, so long as I can use the same logic to discredit you being a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:36 AM
-12

That's fine. Let's start with your account. You're not a female, right? Even though you have female avatar and "woman" flare.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:31 AM
-2

Bonnie Blue's been a tabloid fixture since 2024, most famous for banging her way toward a thousand man body count on camera. She herself has gone on record, multiple times, stating she gets 200-300 death threats daily, and 99.9% come from women. That's from her interviews with The Sun and Daily Mail. She's hired bodyguards over it, contacted police, and even discussed it in her Channel 4 doc 1000 Men and Me. (Cute side note: in the UK, women actually commit roughly 10-15% of all acid attacks. Hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:25 AM
1

Outlier? Jesus Christ. Bonnie Blue is receiving thousands of death threats and rape wishes per week, almost exclusively from women who self identify as feminists, while simultaneously being defended by precisely zero feminist organizations, zero blue check “sex work is work” activists, and zero women’s studies departments. The only outlier here is the feminist who can look at this radioactive levels of female on female hatred and still pretend it doesn’t expose the gigantic asterisk that was alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:04 AM
-1

My “romance” is a direct measure of how completely she submits to being owned. Pretty, young, fertile, no tattoos, no stretch marks, and no screeching souvenir from another man’s dick is a starting standard. If she accepts the collar and the leash, plays the slave well, I’ll give her the fairy tale version she thinks she wants. Refuse, age, fatten, or breed for someone else first, and the flowers die overnight. She becomes furniture I don’t even bother to look at while I fuck, just something to …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:45 PM
1

El Chapo is in a $200 million concrete coffin built exclusively because the world was terrified of him. You’re “free” because you’ve never been worth the concrete. Al-Baghdadi made the U.S. president wake up at 3 a.m. to watch him die on live drone feed. You’ll die quietly in a cubicle and no one will even pause Netflix. The host boys you jerk off to rent their tongues by the hour licking lonely old wrinkled vaginas attached to carcasses with disposable income. They go home with the taste of ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:23 PM
1

A standard and a preference are not the same thing. A standard is a measurement of reality that can predictably be reproduced under only, and specifically, the right conditions. As an example you may need x amount of Chlorine to kill a certain percentile of bacteria. A preference by contrast can be to drink raw water or treated water. A high standard is a factual standard that exists. What women have are not high standards. They are standards for things that have never existed and never will exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:10 AM
-2

You’re half right. I am behind a screen right now. The difference is I’ve been on the other side of it, and you never will be. You keep measuring victory by who gets to walk to Starbucks tomorrow morning without an ankle bracelet. That’s exactly how livestock measure victory, “At least I’m not the one in the slaughter pen today.” El Chapo is in ADX Florence because the most powerful nation on earth spent a decade, billions of dollars, and multiple betrayals of its own allies to put him there. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:44 AM
-3

Confidence is easy when the facts are corpses and you’re the one holding the shovel. You’re about to learn why your lecture hall primatology evaporates the moment you step outside the faculty lounge. “Females flock to alphas for protection.” Correct. They flock to whichever male just murdered or crippled every rival and now controls the territory. The “protection” is from him and the next one like him. The technical term in the literature is “coercively induced mate guarding.” The females aren’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:38 AM
-3

Let me educate you the way the steppe educated cities, quickly and without mercy. Temüjin did not become Genghis Khan by hosting TED talks on consensus. He became Genghis Khan by doing the following. At age nine, he watched his father be poisoned by rivals. He was then enslaved, neck locked in a wooden cangue by the Tayichi’ud. Escaping that, he tracked down every man who ever humiliated him, and personally executed them and their entire adult male lines. He kidnapped his own wife back from the …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:29 AM
0

People who are calm don’t feel the need to repeat “I’m not uncomfortable” like a soothing mantra. I’m right about chimpanzees. Jane Goodall, 1970s Gombe stated adult males on border patrols stalk, isolate, and bludgeon rival males to death with rocks and branches, then forcibly copulate with the females of the defeated group. Documented on film. Mitani & Watts, Ngogo community stated that 18 adult males annihilated a neighboring community over a decade. Every male killed or driven off. Every fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:41 AM
1

You quote Chigurh like a child who found a loaded gun in a movie and thinks reciting the lines makes him dangerous. Let me finish the scene for you. Anton Chigurh didn’t end in a cell. He walked away from the wreckage with a limp and kept moving. That’s the point you keep missing. The true alpha accepts the cage as a pause that is the cost of doing business. El Chapo tunneled out of supermax with a spoon and a smile. You think the cell negates the man. I think the cell simply proves the world st…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:10 AM
-3

Your discomfort is noted. It changes nothing. History is written by the survivors, and the survivors were the ones holding the blades. The “choice” you romanticize was the choice between being taken by the victor today or by the next raider tomorrow. Arranged marriages, bride capture, the Sabine women, the Viking thrall markets, the Ottoman devshirme of Christian girls, the Comanche horse raids that ended with entire settlements of women redistributed like livestock. Every single one of those ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:41 AM
3

No person is entitled to a standard that is delusional, because the standard doesn't exist. You cannot be entitled to something that factually does not exist. Furthermore even if the thing can exist you're not entitled to possessing it. Let's deconstruct a standard in any other context and show utterly ridiculous this particular choice of word is and why everyone should hold it in contempt for it's disingenuous usage. Building codes have construction standards. It's consequential if you don't me…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:16 PM
1

Swinging those community college bold tags like they’re a PhD. How positively ferocious. You’re adorably proud of discovering that the military has ranks and haircuts. Congratulations. Next you’ll inform me that water is wet. The point (which sailed so far over your little head it achieved low orbit) is not that the military is a yoga retreat. The point is that its hierarchy is brittle, transparent, and periodically shatters into pure individual agency the moment real bullets fly. Here’s the par…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 08:52 PM
–

Darling, you keep mistaking the absence of epaulettes for the absence of power. Adorable. Imagine measuring tyranny by how shiny the boots are. How quaint. The army, police, and clergy wear their chains on the outside. Uniforms, salutes, visible ranks. Everyone sees the leash, so everyone knows exactly how to cut it (refuse orders, desert, quit, sue, go AWOL). That’s why men tolerate those structures only when the mission or paycheck justifies it, and why women sensibly avoid them. Now look at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:44 PM
0

The truth is that humans are animals. We're not a distinct being that lives outside of biology upon, which we differ from every other single thing that has ever existed. Specifically we are mammals with distant monkey like cousins. Now that we've established that we're not a special kind of being from outer space that lives in a different dimension above everything else in existence, let's ask a simple question about what happens in 100% of cases in the greater animal kingdom. The simple fact is…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:23 PM
2

Ten kids and a breakdown. Your great grandmother was worked like a plow horse because birth control was illegal, her husband probably thought “marital duty” meant nightly rape, and the local doctor prescribed her Valium and told her to pull herself together. I expect nothing more from pre-1960s obstetric and psychiatric barbarism. Nobody with a pulse is defending that. But here’s the part your little feelings seminar conveniently skips. Every single one of those exhausted, pregnant every year gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:47 PM
0

Sweetheart, your grandmother’s story is a horror, not a norm. A 15 year old child bride raped by a 68 year-old cripple is called felony kidnapping and statutory rape today, and it was called a scandal then too, even if the sheriff looked the other way in some backward holler. I would hardly call such a thing “1950s housewife life”. It was a crime that happened to occur in the 1950s, the same way honor killings still happen in 2025. Exceptions don’t rewrite averages. The typical woman in 1953 mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:43 PM
–

Spare me the wounded pride routine. The fact that you’re personally offended by the observation that most lawyers are glorified paperwork monkeys who bill by the hour to tell you what you’re not allowed to do only proves the point. Lawyers are not “highly skilled professionals”. They’re compliance hall monitors with bar cards and a thesaurus. The partners I work with actually build and own things. Companies, IP, billions in enterprise value while your entire profession exists to mop up after peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:54 AM
0

They don't. Just like accountants.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:20 AM
0

Talk to a couple Vietnam veterans and ask them about the expression "shit happens".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:18 AM
-2

Strategy sessions amongst partners and outsourcing legal expertise for consultations is exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:13 AM
-2

For the most part they prefer a safe pay check.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:11 AM
-2

I have high functioning autism so I do have that tendency. And I'm not asking to be praised of what I did. I'm merely stating that it's common to the point that most people wouldn't argue it exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 04:11 AM
1

If you believe this then you should believe it's common practice. What do you think there's not age discrimination? If you want to act like a common practice is some obscure bug in an otherwise just system, go right ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 04:04 AM
-4

Almost all military and police jobs expect men to handle their shit on their own without having a board meeting about whether they can pull the trigger or not. The layers that you need to go through to execute a decision are far less than any comparative female occupation. Med and Law have almost zero autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 04:00 AM
1

Of course you have control. You have maximum control. You can reject the market and choose to have less income. That's exactly why some corporations structure themselves just so that they don't need to appeal to shareholders. It's also why small business owners choose to have their own level of income.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:57 AM
-1

This is a very naive take. I've personally not hired women for all the reasons above. And there were off the record meeting to do as such. Obviously we crafted narratives to make people not rise to suspicion and we discussed how to do this with our company lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:53 AM
1

Freedom is a spectrum, can we agree on that? And it's obvious that the two ends have a meaningful difference in reality explain a difference in gender values. We're not discussing a variable of independently wealthy people as the only binary standard of freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:50 AM
-1

The point is that men don't like cities, when given the choice. Of course men will compromise and gravitate to wherever the genetic material is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:47 AM
-2

Clearly you didn't understand what I said. Most value control. Women don't. Being in control is a measure of freedom to say no. The consequences of saying no will remain. We're not discussing whether freedom is enjoyable, worth it, or practical. We're discussing the very real fact that women mostly chose to have less freedom regardless of the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:45 AM
-3

Let us start with the fact that you have zero autonomy in your job. You choose to teach in school instead of creating your own startup. The adage that those who can, do; those who can't, teach is around for a reason. Teaching is a blatant example of choosing a predictable arrangement with less freedom over a high-risk alternative with maximum freedom. As someone who's actually accomplished the latter over the former and has now exited with a size-able early retirement, it's clear why some people…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:40 AM
-2

That's what freedom is. It's the ability to own your work. Freedom doesn't imply anything else that the ability to entirely own your decisions without needing to answer to anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:17 AM
0

Trades are dominated by men and have far more autonomy than any comparable block of female jobs. There's not a single segment of jobs that women dominate that ranks high on any freedom index.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:16 AM
-6

Those are your words, not mine. I said less free. And it's obvious women choose less free jobs over jobs with more independence. Whether someone likes autonomy or not is really a matter of taste, and it seems obvious that women don't value it highly outside of sexual autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:14 AM
-5

You mist the gist of the argument. Women had less freedom in their sexual autonomy and more freedom in every other domain. Furthermore the question is why do women gravitate to the least free jobs in the entire world when they're given carte blanche? It's because freedom to women is a single domain issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:12 AM
-4

Getting pregnant means losing a raise. Taking a break means a depreciation of skills. A baby in the belly usually means a no-hire (even though they can't ever prove it). This is common knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:10 AM
-6

The question isn't why women choose a job. It's why do women ostensibly gravitate to the least free jobs ever designed in existence. That's the basis of this post. There are little to no examples of women actually relishing freedom in their independence, which always comes with other caveats.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:07 AM
1

I think the proposed idea that most older women want to impose on younger women is something along the lines of the legal age to drink, which is 21 rather than 18. e.g. a scenario where you can vote but not drink or vote but not consent to an older man. At least that is their fever dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 11:56 PM
1

Older women would do it if it was as easy as eating bucket of ice cream. The issue is that older woman know younger women won't go for it. Older woman also know that there's no way, with a straight face, that they can take away younger women's sexual autonomy on the basis of liberation when their entire platform espouses the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:14 PM
1

We can point to the singular fact that there's a higher incidence of regret amongst ftm than mtf. ftm turns an average woman into a scrawny man, case in point. ftm removes pretty privilege and makes the opposite gender hostile to you, case in point. If we want to settle the score then just compare the only two groups that have ever lived as both genders, ftm and mtf. It's clear cut that ftm has more regrets and mtf has less regrets.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:42 PM
2

Sex is usually at the top of a man's top 10 requirements. For women it doesn't even break the top 10. That's an extreme contradiction. If you remove the need to reproduce and guarantee safety and provide day care easy girl corpo jobs to women then what you end up with is excess testosterone. Women simply treat having a partner like having a pet. They don't actually depend on men for anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:25 PM
1

The shit test is that most women despite their scowls will never raise the age of consent. Likely because they don't have the votes. A big enough chunk of young women will silently vote against having their freedoms impinged by older post walls who are really just trying to do intra-sexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter