TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NuclearLove Archive

View 0 posts and 6 comments by NuclearLove on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No, you silly child. This is quite literally what the judge said: The court's task is to determine whether Nunggesser plausibly alleges a claim for gender based discrimination under Title IX. The peer harassment forming the basis for a Title IX claim must also be, of course, "gender oriented." He assumes that because the allegations against him concerned a sexual act that everything that follows from it is" sex based" within the meaning of Title IX. Implicit in Nunggesser's claim is the belief t…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:53 PM
0

The court's task is to determine whether Nunggesser plausibly alleges a claim for gender based discrimination under Title IX. The peer harassment forming the basis for a Title IX claim must also be, of course, "gender oriented." He assumes that because the allegations against him concerned a sexual act that everything that follows from it is" sex based" within the meaning of Title IX. Implicit in Nunggesser's claim is the belief that *sex based discrimination, for the purposes of Title IX, means…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:31 PM
-2

Is this what I saw that wasn't there? The court's task is to determine whether Nunggesser plausibly alleges a claim for gender based discrimination under Title IX. The peer harassment forming the basis for a Title IX claim must also be, of course, "gender oriented." He assumes that because the allegations against him concerned a sexual act that everything that follows from it is" sex based" within the meaning of Title IX. Implicit in Nunggesser's claim is the belief that *sex based discriminatio…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:58 PM
-4

No, sweetie. The judge anticipated that dim witted monkeys like you would fail to understand the concept, so he went to great lengths to explain this concept. He begins on page 9, Section III, sub A, sub 1, and continues all the way to page 14 of his decision. By reproducing onky one sentence out of context, you assert the opposite of what the judge said. The court's task is to determine whether Nunggesser plausibly alleges a claim for gender based discrimination under Title IX. The peer harassm…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:46 PM
-1

The decision is based on abundant and well established case law. Your childish analysis is your own invention. It does not represent the court's decision.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:31 PM
2

The judge didn't say that. He said the opposite. In great detail.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter