TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

NwbieGD Archive

View 0 posts and 260 comments by NwbieGD on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

No I really just want equality and no hypocrisy or double standards. What's acceptable or not is for society to decide, as long as they are consistent, afterwards I can then decide if I'm okay with it or not. However the easiest solution, especially in something like a movie scene recording where you can easily ask for consent without making things awkward, you should imo always ask for consent. Most/many of the time people(feminists) that claim such things or think such things are just way to u…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:32 PM
1

No I don't need to ask, if you make a claim you provide the sources/references for it. Otherwise it's nothing but a random claim by a random stranger. But goodbye to your entitled lazy ass, indeed as you said goodbye and fuck off, Sheesh your a piece of work ....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 03:38 PM
0

See these 2 comments with regards to hypergamy and what i believe, https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/zrdqxr/bar_is_too_low_for_men_they_dont_even_do_bare/j15n479 https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/zrdqxr/bar_is_too_low_for_men_they_dont_even_do_bare/j16clcd Now sure if you think that men do tend to date up on average similarly as much as women, then at least provide some actual arguments abs supporting sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:31 PM
1

Well I already confirmed that, thanks for the explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:19 PM
0

You're talking about reading what people wrote let's see, It's actually a phenomenon called Hypergamy Below are some sources regarding these statistics, although I do strongly suggest you verify these things (people should do so generally speaking). That's responding to this comment you wrote: Do you have a study on the 80% figure? It's in contrast to what I've read. Not to every other possible comment you wrote before or in the chain. Be happy someone is sharing sources and if not then next the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:18 PM
1

part (2/2) For the tinder data the assumption, which I think is fair cobsidering the app and its design, that pictures are the most deciding factor, as a profile can't contain more than 500 characters and thus nothing really useful or in depth to help you decide. If pictures are the most important factor by a far amount, then it's the attractiveness that people base their first decision on if they are interested. So what it means is that women on average only find top 20% attractive enough to da…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:07 PM
0

Some men yes, on average no, hypergamy isn't really about physical attractiveness that much though. However on average men tend to try to date women with similar attractiveness and seeing how they rate women on actual bell curve, I do feel they have a more realistic/objective view of attractiveness (at least on dating apps or online). Do note I'm also sure a significant portion do try to date physically more attractive women. I just believe that on average it's much more present among women to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 02:04 PM
1

Did you even read your own sources? From your first link: One estimate found that over 70% of active American Tinder users were male, and the ratio of male-to-female users among our data was similar. Yes I did read them, just several of them over 2 years ago, so I'm not going to remember every detail. One estimate found Kinda, also that means it's for a large part still an assumption. Tinder should actually have the data. The claim wasn't "on dating apps." The claim was specifically, "in reality…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 01:16 PM
1

So then these women do think they are generally dating less attractive men than them. Even if you don't assign the same level of importance to attractiveness that doesn't change what you rate the attractiveness. Keep in mind these are based on averages, not everyone is the same but these are data based on an online dating population. At least what I said would be something that the data suggests.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 01:07 PM
2

So these women would be lying to themselves and everyone else based on their ratings because that's what you suggest. Or do women think they are generally dating less attractive men they them. It doesn't refute the point, I just give you two possible alternate explanations that seem more in line with the results. Maybe ots also influenced by supply and demand but that seems more likely for Tinder statistics as OKcupid worked very differently and got results from actual ratings given not by swipi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 12:33 AM
2

In what sense, men were clearly not as affected by wealth nor would it make biological sense from an evolutionary point. Parental investment is much higher for women and can produce way less children in the same time as a man could. Homo sapiens have existed for 300 000 years or so, monopoly especially as in modern society has only come into effect in the last 500 years or so. From an evolutionary standpoint that is absolutely nothing, maybe 9 to 14 generations. While men have only taking less o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 12:05 AM
2

Hypergamy probably exists to a decent extension also in reality but probably not like 80/20 like it does online. Probably reality is way less exaggerated/exarbated/pronounced then the online environment. https://incels.wiki/w/Hypergamy#80/20_Rule Women's hypergamy is mainly a result of their higher choosiness, higher uniformity of sexual desire, and men's higher sex drive and promiscuity. These differences are thought to have evolved from higher parental investment on part of the female.[2] [2] …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 09:07 PM
3

Hypergamy is not that far fetched and there's some evidence for it. Also more than enough recent evidence, however let me first ask you what YOU consider old in this case, over 20 years, over 30 years, over 50 years? The 80/20 rule is true but on dating apps/websites, not necessarily in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 08:02 PM
7

They are from tinder and OKcupid, you're now claiming a statistic withoyt any reference/source yourself. Show me it's 70/30 with a source. However it doesn't matter that much how many people of each group participate. If 1000 participate you can still get the percentages of what they vote (less just means less reliable and greater standard deviation). Secondly it supports the claim that on these dating apps women rate 80% of men below average. Is that translatable to real life is a hard question…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 07:45 PM
13

It's actually a phenomenon called Hypergamy Below are some sources regarding these statistics, although I do strongly suggest you verify these things (people should do so generally speaking). https://thebolditalic.com/the-two-worlds-of-tinder-f1c34e800db4 https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Hypergamy (biased source but they provide their sources/referencs clearly for their claims) https://archive.is/pLAWq https://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 03:46 PM
1

u/frodobaggginz no reply, while you replied to many other things you seem to keep avoiding the above question...
/r/MensRights20/12/22 05:43 PM
2

It kinda does. Point is that defamation/slander is generally not accepted as free speech and punishable by law. Specifically accusing someone of something they didn't do to destroy their reputation. Basically what some of these trans activists are doing or on the edge of. That's another reason why George well said 2+2=4 As long as you don't purposely lie you should basically be able to say anything. Note opinion is never a lie.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:41 PM
11

I’m very concerned with women being oppressed. Everyone should be. That's avoiding the question asked ... Which one should concern us more again? One is a revolution and the other is a major war with a high chance of escalating to WWIII. Yes women being oppressed is bad, however you seem to not get and understand Iran is a hellhole for a lot of people and generally been problematic for over 20 years, lots of local small disputes, rampant racism between religions, sexism, and just about every for…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:21 PM
5

Exactly....
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:32 AM
38

It's smarter to only count hospilizations related to suicide as actual real attempts. Like if you really wanted to die and really tried you should in most scenarios at up in the hospital or dead. I do not think all self reported claims were serious attempts and among some women possibly also just cries for attention when they did it but never really planned on going through with it. https://www.statista.com/statistics/744091/hospitalized-adults-after-attempting-suicide-by-gender-us/ As you can s…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:49 PM
1

What should it matter what your skin colour is? Equality doesn't care about your skin colour Also that sub is well, toxic, probably the most toxic parts of feminism. Reddit generally can be quite toxic and most people proclaiming themselves to be X, generally aren't X.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 07:21 PM
59

Throw me into prison when I'm innocent, treat me like a criminal when I'm not, and I'll become one, wreaking havoc on those responsible for putting me there, a few years after I get out, don't worry I had to have enough patience when thrown in and being stuck there, I'll have enough patience to make sure I got it properly planned out and people aren't guarded anymore.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:25 PM
1

Let's see again, nope don't think I missed something, ... Also why are you being an ass instead of jist writing exactly what you mean. Well if they quoted it, why didn't you simply copy paste those quotes and posted the link to the scientific source? Not hard to do ... The BURDEN OF PROOF is with the person making the claim, not anyone else. You made unsubstantiated claims, so far you've proven none. Thus they are nothing more but unsubstantiated claims. Let's quote you and see what you claimed …
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:57 PM
1

Posting links doesn't mean anything, especially if said links don't provide the statistics/data or proof to support YOUR CLAIMS. Your claims are still unsubstantiated. But it doesn't matter if I read your articles or not, if they really supported your claims, you could have copy-padted the parts that proof your claims and added them as quotes to your comment. However 1 thing has become glaringly obvious to me, you actually have problems with comprehensive reading, or you simply imagine a whole b…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 04:38 PM
2

Let's quote you and see what you claimed ... I don't know anything about Brazil, but in the US men who ask for partial custody almost always get it, Where are the statistics on this, this is your biggest and the most important claim regarding the topic and women who falsely accuse men of abuse are statistically punished for it by the courts. Again a claim, where are the supporting statistics in your articles Some states now award 50/50 as a default, Okay some states, what states or is there a lo…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:23 PM
5

Could you maybe add sources for the statistics in your speech? Maybe in a comment
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:08 PM
49

Most important LOG THE HOURS.... Also if as you say you work 50-60 hours, 10-12 a day that should mean you're generally first to arrive, last to leave. Start logging these hours of everyone there, do this for at least another month and keep up the work for just that month. Then go to your boss again, calculate the average working hours of others that have the same job/position and only then start addressing to your manager it isn't fair and you won't be discriminated. Knowing your hours from all…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:02 PM
1

I don't see this among hot posts or even when I search for meme or make white man angry. Has it maybe already been removed?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:47 PM
4

Simply say you identify as gender fluid. Point being, you don't mention how much time you on average spend as different genders or floating in between. You can be a man 99% of the time and the other 1% not feel a man, doesn't mean you have to feel like a woman, you can also feel agender, or whatever gender or idea you want. Say that sometimes you feel extremely caring and nurturing for others, especially in specific situations (or something similar). Being gender fluid is basically the identifie…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 05:26 PM
1

Simple it's none of anyone's fucking business. It's their choice if they both want this. They only people I could reasonably consider that would be allowed to have some opinion would be their direct families and friends. Even then it's up to Billie and Jesse to decide. They are 2 consenting adults that want this, end of story.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:36 PM
0

Edit, guy above me edited his comment it previously said Says the girl who didn't read the article Edit finished ... I'm a guy, I got better grades at maths and similar then the girls in my class, because it's objective, I find it weird how someone can score math or even physics subjectively. Read my comment again instead of skimming it. I think neatness plays a role but I always told teachers to kiss my ass since that's not evaluating the subject. I tend to argue with a teacher if I feel they a…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 04:23 PM
6

I always wondered if girls on average were simply better at subjective courses or teachers playing (maybe subconsciously) favourites. You see generally for objective courses more engineering geared, such as chemistry, physics, mathematics, etc, I generally had some of the highest grades with some guys in my class, girls could generally not even get close especially with a class average. I also wondered if it was a mostly interest thing and effort put in however I also wondered if that was really…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 01:26 PM
7

So when women will stop having sex because abortions are illegal that's logical and reasonable because apparently all men agreed to ban abortions (when voters are about 50/50). However when men are actually scared to be accused of harassing women and therefore avoid interaction and decide they prefer to be single and not date, it's a crime and hate ... While especially with all the movements and how nowadays you can't know what's harassment and not, because no one is willing to draw a clear line…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:50 PM
87

Yep hypocrisy and inconsistentency in a nutshell. People can't read minds and if you want no to mean no, then stop any BS of playing hard to get. You can't say this person is allowed to continue but that person isn't without being explicitly clear about it. If you say no that should mean the same thing to every men you talk to not a different thing that people can not know, because people can not read your fucking mind ..
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:09 PM
9

No that second part is very human. Most people are just pretentious pieces of shit that simply won't admit it nor have the balls to admit it. Women are better at lying and manipulation and generally more prone to do so. Keep in mind a lot of people will say it's not really lying but any form of manipulation simply is. That's semantics which people try to use to justify themselves, especially pretentious people. There are even early indicators that they are biologically better at it. https://www.…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:26 PM
1

Yes even better yet, they tend to make logical sense, especially if we look at what's best from an evolutionary standpoint even. Man biologically can have many children and tend to have a much lower parental investment. Women can have generally much fewer and would generally invest much more per child. Thus women will put much more effort in finding 1 good or perfect partner, while men would consider most that are good enough. (Of course I'm exaggerating and oversimplifielying it but that's the …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:08 PM
1

I suggest checking out the tinmen https://thetinmen.blog/ For dating look up Hypergamy https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Hypergamy Regarding a pay gap, with clear evidence for the Netherlands "In scientific and technical occupations it's more likely and it's possible to combine having a good job with having some flexibility in your work hours or lower work hours," says Burtless. https://fee.org/articles/harvard-study-gender-pay-gap-explained-entirely-by-work-choices-of-men-and-women/amp…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:42 PM
9

Nahhhh people are still slaves to their biology for A large part. Just about any interactive app/website tries to abuse that biology to improve retention/participation/investment(monetary). Tinder will purposefully target men with enough money and then frustrate them into paying. They do this be dangling bait and showing initial succes and then cutting them off. Women on the other hand still have trouble actually choosing what they personally like. They care a whole lot about what others think a…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:15 PM
46

The thing is women are way pickier and more superficial than most men, on average, however women tend to often be hypocrites and pretentious about it not willing to admit it. A man most of the time will simply say and admit they were physically attracted to a woman. Woman won't generally acknowledge that they were attracted to a man's status or wealth, or often not even appearance. You see use any dating app, most of them allow 500 characters or sometimes words. Generally less than 10 pictures. …
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:39 PM
1

You see, I find it interesting how she keeps "dating" these types of guys. The fact that they pay such high amounts as well. For someone this basic, ... You know, looks to me like she's picking richer guys that flaunt their wealth, .... What do you expect? most guys who dangle their wealth are fishing for dumb desperate sluts that they will drop at a heart beat. They pick the women that are there for the money, thus they don't see anything but a financial interaction for some physical fun .... S…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:03 PM
1

Most of these women live either in countries where that's unsafe or huge as cities with creepy neighborhoods. However it really isn't as much of an issue as many make it out to be, or at least not in many places I've been or visited and often when it was it wouldn't be the smartest thing to walk alone anyway, man or woman.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 11:11 AM
19

Then please, please, please explain to me. Why women/girls dress up like that when going out, but not when just home alone for the night. If want to you feel sexy you can just as easily dress up that way when you're having a wine party, sleepover, whatever with just the girls. However guess what from all the girls I know, they don't dress up in the sake sexy clubbing clothes then. Nor does the majority of girls/women ... If it's just to feel sexy you can put on music at home and dance alone or w…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:42 PM
15

Ahhhhh American culture 🤣😂 In my country buying a drink isn't as common and I never buy drinks for American girls, they feel flakey and fake/disingenuous, after hearing this it mostly confirms what I thought. A friend of mine did and I felt they were just trying to get free drinks ... (I guess I was probably right) Normally you try to chat up a conversation and either you get rejected or you don't. You can buy a drink if they are still talking or dancing with you after 2-5 minutes or so (assumin…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:30 PM
22

If it's was anywhere close by, I would have put on some very flashy clothes and then gone in, and go say people are staring at me. Also I would have someone record me secretly and security, see if they actually give equal treatment. Lastly I do not think people understand that some people take off their glasses or forget their contacts when they go out. This results in them often staring because everything gets blurrier after 2m and then you can stare because you don't see to well, you might not…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:19 PM
1

No you can try spinning it any way you want, it doesn't change what YOU wrote, and that comment with those equations is simply wrong. Nothing is on me, only on you, but I guess you're either too arrogant to admit it or just too ignorant to actually get it ... First person I'm blocking ... No point in arguing with people that can't even understand what they write themselves, definitely if they have so much problems with understanding data and/or logic ... The only problem is that you keep trying …
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:39 AM
1

As I said doesnt matter one bit. You replied to someone's comment and I'm addressing your comment and what you wrote. Probably because when you divide them by the total single female/male households the ratio is higher for men? That's what you wrote, then using data and equations that were simply wrong. Mistakes can happen but you trying to spin this and trying to avoid admitting that the comment was simply wrong ... Now that requires significant effort and maybe arrogance/pride. Hell you haven'…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:20 PM
1

Great I don't care were you got that line from, that wasn't in your comment, the one I quoted multiple times (just make sure I had an immutable copy). You replied to a comment, your comment should be clear from reading the previous comment and your comment (unless you're are addressing a person specifically). However the data is simple, mother's on average are much more likely to hurt their children, the data is very obvious and clear about that. What the data doesn't say if thats because they s…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:03 PM
1

Dude just stop the BS and nonsense.... If you showed by doing you wouldn't have started talking and addressing only the case for dividing by single parents. You would and should have addressed the pack of data if that was your point. The equations you used, with that data, are simply wrong, the end.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:37 PM
1

In no way does your reply say, "Because there isn't enough data to draw conclusions" No you reply by asking a different question, implying it's because the data is supposedly different/skewed due to not using the right metrics (which OPs data kinda does, at least better than your metric). Which you then TRY answering yourself with your data and equation that just don't work because you used the wrong/incompatible data. Seriously... Let me quote what you wrote ... Probably because when you divide…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:24 PM
1

Seriously... Let me quote what you wrote ... Probably because when you divide them by the total single female/male households the ratio is higher for men? I can't quickly find the data for the same years as the linked data in OPs post but using what google throws up for current data "Number of U.S. children living in a single parent family 1970-2020. In 2020, there were about 15.31 million children living with a single mother in the United States, and about 3.27 million children living with a si…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:24 PM
2

Both women and men get advantages, sometimes it might be more obvious as a huge disadvantages for the other. However as a women you can get away with a lot more small bad things than as a men. Think about getting out of a fine because you look hot and are friendly to the cop. Also as a man if you try to be nice to a kid, with good intentions, big fat chance someone will call you a creep for no good reason. If you think it doesn't apply to work, well this just got posted https://www.reddit.com/r/…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 07:55 PM
5

The problem equity is subjective, equality much less so being mostly objective. No two people will agree on what exactly equity is if presented with scenarios from all over the world. Equality on the other hand is very clear and simple in general. And no that school example is exactly why I'm not a fan of equity. One school might be more expensive, or harder to get in to, therefore it might have more prestige or better professors or facilities. Equality is both kids got the option to go to eithe…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:43 PM
1

So your equations are nice and fun but you're mixing data sets, and dividing when it doesn't make sense. I'll try to explain what the issue is with what you're doing. The numbers for mother only and father only from that data set, mean only the mother (or farther) was involved, without other people but more importantly without the other parent being there. However that data doesn't say anything about if the mothers (or fathers) that did that were living alone or together. You would need to know …
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:50 PM
4

So a few questions because most of the links to sources, including when trying to click further, isn't working. So please tell me what the numbers mean exactly, what data do they present precisely. 1452099? 1704? Why do you need to add 1704 to about 1.45 million? For the 15.31 I don't see a source that work, link just send you to the general page of statista. Same story basically for the other 3 values. Honestly curious to see if the data OP shared is purposefully being misrepresented or that yo…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:02 PM
2

Or the classic escape an hypocrite uses because they don't have actual logical arguments, "but that's different", no it isn't you're just a hypocrite. I often present similar scenarios and replace groups, like white, men, women, trans, black, Asian, etc, with X, and Y, or A and B, or 1 and 2. Then I ask them and often give an example where I put groups in place that would fit their standard believe/narrative. When you then ask they will say that yes it's bad or wrong. However then I say well in …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 12:06 PM
2

An no maybe have the balls to use your main account so that you actually lose the karma on there instead of a throwaway account just to come here and just spewing some nonsense. People might listen if you provided well structured arguments and decent sources, not written by feminists themselves of course, as that will obviously be biased to paint them in a positive colour.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 11:54 PM
15

These people really don't understand the most basic words, "all", if you hate all men, you hate, your grandpa on both sides, all your uncles, your dad, and any husband or boyfriend. Meaning you can't have a heterosexual relationship as a female, if you do and hate all men, then you never liked them to begin with and the relationship is a lie probably with some alternative dumb goal. More importantly you have been manipulating and gaslighting the person you're supposedly un love with the entire r…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/22 09:27 AM
1

As soon as someone begins about something likes this or that, by example a pay gap that in many places and fields doesn't exist anymore among those under 40 ... (Less than 3% I consider negligible and possibly caused by unquantifiable factors) You should ask for specific information, often they can't answer, to which you can say, something along the lines of, " So you don't even know the basic statistics/figures and you just assumed you were right and that there's a pay gap. Is that based on ane…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 10:20 AM
2

Ahhhh I read as a type dude is ... Instead of dudes. Yeah that would be weird, never heard someone talk like that (yet). You shouldn't have to but apparently for enough people that isn't clear \o/
/r/MensRights10/04/22 05:55 PM
11

Maybe yell a bit louder at your fellow leftists. Because unfortunately even though this is a small subset, they are the absolute loudest and make the biggest splash in the (social)media landscape. Even with that small subset they are actually getting companies and governments to listen to their BS that's negative for a majority of the population and only positive for a tiny minority. While democracy is supposed to achieve the best possible results for the overwhelming majority of the population.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:21 PM
3

No that sounds like a specific choose of words because they won't to make sure that the dude is working out to get cis women, aka females and not all those that proclaim themselves to be women and can never be a female. When I'm done with the nonsense of people talking all kinds of nonsense regarding gender, I just switch the topic to sex. That people don't like that is their problem, gender is too ambiguous nowadays and usually kind of pointless to use in most situations/places. The guy is a fr…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:18 PM
6

Exactly, selecting people based on their sex or gender is usually called sexism, aka a form of discrimination. This law basically does the opposite of what it's supposed to stand for.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:10 PM
30

So when I read the article it says this: In terms of the new law, if one gender makes up less than 40 per cent of the available seats in parliament, a maximum of 12 seats, six on either side of the House, will be added for the minority gender. While I absolutely think a gender quota is stupid if every adult is allowed to vote, and it shouldn't displace other candidates. The way I read it, it does seem it's made to be the same for each gender. However democracy does not work with these quota that…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:28 AM
1

Not sure what country the fuck you're in but not that I know of here
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:19 PM
5

Imagine if a man made a similar post and wrote something like, If your wife leaves you after you beat them, they aren't a real women ... 🤣😂
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/22 08:49 PM
2

She's dating the the top 10 or 1% most attractive guys on those websites/apps. However usually if you're in the top 10 or 1% you have a lot of options as a guy, it's ridiculous because women are fairly picky and more superficial regarding looks than most men (at least on average). So what ends up happening is a few guys have a lot of options and the rest has few to no chances. Many of these guys in the top 10 and even more so in the top 1% are your typical fuck boy that spent a lot of time on th…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:04 PM
7

You know what a bigger problem and actual discrimination, different prices for tinder plus or gold between men and women, even different prices for different ages. Why the fuck do you think there prices are not fixed anywhere you don't have to log in or where it would have to be fixed? It's not on their website for good reasons.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:45 PM
2

So this is a recommendation when making these types of surveys. Instead of trying to get people to not fill something in add an extra question were you ask for someone's sex or gender, with an option "I prefer not to say". Then only look at the results from men/males in the survey ;)
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:03 AM
6

The above is generally called a hasty generalisation or over-generalisation, same fallacy with some different names.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:22 AM
-36

Would be better for the planet at least 🤣 Maybe a better species rises that doesn't fuck up its society as much as we did. Listen I don't mind mutual destruction, I relish in it and will go down laughing and then saying, "see we/I told you so". Not being scared of death itself is kinda nice 😅
/r/MensRights06/02/22 09:27 PM
1

I agree but we all knew that would never happen there anyway. Doesn't mean I was not positively surprised that she at least got the right advice and in the top comments I didn't see anyone really agreeing that men were bad or to blame, which I'll call that a good thing. I also agree there's unfair or unequal treatment for similar things, however we both know that it's not going be addressed in TwoX.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 02:55 PM
0

Well surprisingly she actually did receive (mostly) the right help from TwoX, at least all the top reactions I could see were recommending getting therapy, seeing a doctor, psychologist, psychiatrist, etc. She posted in 2 places, trueoffmychest where she got few likes, and most top comments also recommended therapy and stuff. https://ibb.co/kXm8Z8L
/r/MensRights31/01/22 08:28 PM
1

Like this is so simple Only get a kid of its a deliberate choice, at that point complaining about what you shouldn't do is moot, or you clearly went in blind, ignorant, and without actually thinking about the future. If it isn't a deliberate choice get s fucking abortion, don't ever get kids if you don't want to give them the best life possible.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 06:55 PM
32

Sure please provide links to scientific articles and quote the parts that confirms what you claim. That women are more vulnerable than men, and let's keep it in topic and focus on the things this article said, Physical neglect, violence victimisation, parental substance abuse, and sexual abuse. While we would not say vulnerable but instead are talking about being exposed more to said dangers/problems/abuse.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 08:04 AM
2

Make the question abstract, cake is a good idea, I like to use X and Y. Then afterwards show them that they are hypocrite by replacing the abstract parts. By example, if you get beaten up/abused by "X" then you can't trust any/most "X's". So do they agree with, if you get beaten up/abused by a man then you can't trust most men. If they agree then ask about the following, If you get beaten up/abused by a woman then you can't trust most women. Or If you get beaten up/abused by a black person then …
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:21 PM
4

Burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. Which is you. The above is a fallacy of burden of proof, and a childish and hominem attack. Also I've actually some indian friends, and trust me arranged marriages aren't all bad, plenty of good ones. Especially since nowadays it's often parents just arranging a date or something, especially when they aren't married yet around 25-30 years of age.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 07:53 PM
9

Exactly this, this is completely misplaced angered at people who didn't do this to her. The group that enforces these things is her religion, but being a dumb idiot, she lacks enough self-awareness to understand this and of course it couldn't be her amazing religious support group and her god that put her through such misery. So what easy scapegoats exist so she doesn't have to blame herself, her family, or her religion, as that would break her unrealistic and dumb world view. Well since lots of…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:12 PM
2

You should have that tweet replied to it with "I hate women #killallwomen". Then screenshotted it or something and when it gets banned repost showing that yours got banned and theirs didn't, proof of sexism.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:02 PM
1

Just ask anyone who claims such things to provide proof, with it being the statistical economical/financial reports regarding wages and show how in a comparative cohort the wage gap is not only real but the approximate size. If your teacher says they don't have it, point out to them the burden of proof fallacy (any debate teacher will confirm as much). Tell your teacher if they can't provide proof and haven't seen something confirm it, that it's nothing more than a claim and hypothesis. Might an…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 05:35 PM
11

I'm sorry, I'm a guy but I kinda agree with her that evolutionary women will be less attracted to crying(weaker) men. Doesn't mean it's right but what I'm trying to say and point out is that women's brains are wired to be less attracted to males they perceive as weaker. Crying is generally linked to that, also evolutionarily. What annoys me is that most people, women more so than men, can't and won't admit that. However if you want equality then get the fuck over it and learn to control your imp…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:11 PM
2

The early indicators are only good to know that as soon as it happens to immediately get the fuck out. Also yeah I agree with that.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 08:48 PM
1

Honeymoon phase or pink goggle phase called in other countries is the start of a relationship. Generally always before the marriage. It's called the honeymoon phase, not a honeymoon. Early flowery period of a relationship when you just get together and it's all happy and stuff I do completely agree with the comment about the psychology field. Again I tried looking up the info or alternative info but I think it's not available or I simply don't know the right jargon to find it \o/ Later years ref…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:21 AM
2

Sure some people lack self understanding and whatever. However you can not know a person well within 10 days if you just started dating them. Unless you were maybe friends for years already but even then it's unlikely that you could know how it's to live with that person. I'm not discussing exceptions, I'm talking about what's smart in general. Lottery example, you play the lottery for 10 or 20 years and still never win once. You can also be afraid of conflict or change and not end a relationshi…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:36 AM
0

I don't give a crap about people's gender/sex in general, except for those I want to date or bang. Edit, correction I never care about someone's gender their choice in how they choose to describe part of their personality. Better to just experience and witness their personality.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:31 AM
1

Couldn't find a proper decent source, at least not one that was scientific and clear enough. However generally they will show signs of control within a year. The only immediate somewhat okay source I found https://www.verywellmind.com/signs-that-a-relationship-could-turn-violent-4100203 Couples who rarely argued or had verbal conflicts in the first year of marriage, were much less likely to have violence in later years, whether the husband was drinking or not. What this implies is that generally…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:23 AM
1

Great and clear reply ..
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:06 AM
1

Didn't say it was your personal experience, I'll look up a source for it, might take a bit.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:06 AM
2

Well damn the US is really messed up. Country of freedom and stuff my ass 🤣😂
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:59 PM
1

Again I already mentioned a few times I don't live in the US so no not wrong. Sorry you made a wrong assumption, maybe because you think everyone on Reddit lives in the same country?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:57 PM
2

Yep I still don't think that was a well thought-out decision and smart at that point. Just because it worked and you got lucky doesn't mean that your anecdotal evidence shows it's a smart thing to do. Same as buying a lottery ticket, doesn't make buying one in general a good decision as on average it's a loss and quite a big one percentage wise. However doesn't mean some people don't get lucky and win.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:55 PM
1

First of all doesn't matter if it's a man or woman, never specified it for that reason, your assumption ;) Yeah apparently the US is even more fucked up than most places ...
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:53 PM
1

Regarding the 2nd point As I said before No but I'm not talking about women/men in general changing. Truly, abusive people tend to not hide it well 9ver long periods, or all of a sudden become abusive. Honestly that's rare, if this tackles 90-99% of the cases then that's a good start and more than enough. So sure someone can change but most people don't all of a sudden become abusive, so sure exceptions exist but is not what this is meant for. If they truly become abusive record any visible mark…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:44 PM
0

Well then if that's true the US is even more messed up then I thought. However I find it hard to believe if someone truly attacks you that you aren't allowed to defend yourself. Imagine if a women goes on a killing spree with a knife? Wouldn't be the first time a random starts waving and attacking others with a knife?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:25 PM
1

No but I'm not talking about women/men in general changing. Truly abusive people tend to not hide it or all of a sudden become abusive. Honestly that's rare, if this tackles 90-99% of the cases then that's a good start and more than enough. So sure someone can change but most people don't all of a sudden become abusive, so sure exceptions exist but is not what this is meant for. If they truly become abusive record any visible marks and file for a divorce, make sure to note down everything (heck …
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:56 PM
4

1 you assume people were married, you shouldn't marry anyone that you have been together with for less than a year at least. By that time you should have found out. Seeing how they spoke about an ex, I assumed a GF or BF, not a married couple for multiple years. Secondly if someone actually hits you, take pictures of whatever marks are left. Physical abuse by anyone is still physical abuse and self-defence is still allowed. Lastly I truly think it's a heavy overexaggeration at least in my countr…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 03:50 PM
4

True but you do have the choice to just end the relationship at that moment. If everyone did just that most abusive people would quickly be out of a relationship. Honestly the quickest and easiest to implement solution if people grow a backbone. However once someone hits you it's fair game to hit back, aka self-defence. How big or who you are doesn't matter shit if it's about equality (gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality doesn't matter), we can make an exception for age maybe, don't hit a kid bac…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 03:27 PM
0

You mean like sheeple? But isn't that a form of indoctrination through mass "monkey sees monkey does"? Influencers on Instagram are often from my perspective in a way indoctrinating their followers (although much more subtle and to a lesser degree). Look this is what are things that would your life great/amazing, by example being overly fit/healthy.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:37 PM
8

I don't know if you ever visited r/banned ? Any idea how many females actually also get banned from there. The funny thing is this sub breaks a bunch of Reddit rules, if we made a male sub like that it would have been banned (if I remember correctly something like that actually happened). Reddit has double standards, like many too woke leftists. Also nothing you will say will change their views, cult is an appropriate term, as these people are so messed up or indoctrinated that it doesn't matter…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:06 AM
20

I lived there for a few years and trust me it's the most sex equal country I've ever been to. Not ethnicity equal but very sex equal XD Also trust me the women a western man would have to worry about would not claim false rape accusations. You do realise they're a weird complicated Islamic state, right? As a western man you don't have to fear accusations in that regard. Because it would mean the woman would have either broken a law as well, you're officially not allowed sex outside of marriage n…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 08:50 PM
24

And then people wonder why all of a sudden a confused man shoots people ... Because the man is mentally deranged and nothing upfront to cause it might have happened ... Hell I would have threatened every single person holding me down and pressed charges against all of them for putting MY kid's life at stake and physically assaulting me (hypothecial don't have kids atm). If the police then does it off as something minor, well faces and names are easy to get/remember and removing people is not tha…
/r/MensRights19/12/21 11:39 PM
7

Get the publication, print it out at uni, leave it silently somewhere she sits to read or at the kitchen table (somewhere you know she'll find it). You're allowed to highlight some things especially if the paper is a bit dense or non-obvious/obfuscated. See what happens ;) The idea is confronting her, without her feeling attacked nor being shamed for it in your apartment/building or public. So doing it quietly can give her time to reflect if she actually reads it. Lastly it's also just funny bec…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 12:22 PM
2

It's not (white) men calling other (white) men privileged without valid reasons. Its not most men who tend to have double standards for their partners. Or say one thing but want something else. It's not men who generally judge men harsher for similar crimes, see female Vs male teachers when sexual crimes are involved, that's society and more often women. It's female judges who tend to be biased sometimes (anecdotal evidence but look up the story of the doctor and the girl that shouldn't have bee…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 12:18 PM
8

Generally the truth is often the most hurtful XD
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/21 10:31 PM
1

Thanks great reply Point 2 equal opportunity, the second option isn't equality but equity which is BS. Because otherwise it doesn't matter who's better at things anymore and is basically a hidden form of extreme/radicalised communism. Point 1, I'll look for any relevant source from before 2000, probably around the 60s-80s But I agree (although depends a bit on the country), voting rights for women was I believe one of the first things fought for if I remember correctly. Good points I'll see what…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:22 AM
5

One small comment. Girls/women do well when young and hot (below 30 or 35), at which point their generally is a bit of imbalance for how easy it is to find someone for them. However usually after 30 these women lose and men have the upper hand when it comes to picking. Basically young women under 25 have their pick of the litter at least for dating on a short term basis (until the guy gets fed up with their lack of personality). Funnily guys above 30 have their pick of the litter and they at lea…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 03:18 AM
1

Sure I'll look this up for you but it will not be today anymore, probably tomorrow or the day after that. Any reasonable specific conditions for the sources.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:15 AM
-1

Originally feminism was all about equality newer generations tend to more commonly push it (way) past that. This is based on averages. You can say whatever you want in the past woman were not considered nor treated equal to men just look at the 60s or 70s, or countries such as Saudi Arabia or Qatar.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:33 PM
5

An ad-hominem attack is a fallacy per say. Too many people are just too dumb to understand and get that, especially with current day politics. Also nothing bad about it per say, however it's how people also consider all feminists bad (while true/old feminist truly just want equality, it's generally the modern spoiled pieces of garbage that feel they deserve to be privileged). This is a fallacy called hasty- or over-generalisation It also shouldn't matter what your viewpoint on another random top…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:24 PM
1

I thought that was also considered rape but good to know that it's considered sexual assault legally.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:20 AM
1

Ask your work the following question, So if a guy forces a girl to lick and eat out his ass it's not rape? Nor if he makes her give him a handjob or boob job?
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:24 AM
6

Yes but then the charge should have been about not properly informing the mother. You can't blame the doctor for getting born. Which results in different charges. Even then in most places, you're supposedly unguilty until proven otherwise. When it's the word of 1 person Vs another person then that evidence holds equal weight. Lastly it's on the person making claims to prove they are right (burden of proof). So if this woman can't provide proof he didn't tell her then the case should immediately …
/r/MensRights02/12/21 07:03 PM
68

No more importantly, who decided and had the kid, the doctor or her mom. The only one responsible for her birth are her parents, no one forced her parents to get a kid, they decided to. So unless the doctor is also her farther this absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 02:25 PM
1

People just whining about small inconveniences maybe ?
/r/MensRights01/12/21 11:23 PM
3

I think one major point is also 1 doesn't require you to actually perform surgery while the other does, the impact of a surgery on your body is much greater than most people know because most people haven't had one. Invasive surgery Vs inserting a small device in an already existing cavity. 1 takes about 5 minutes, minimal to no pain. The other takes anesthesia, and being under a knife for about 20 minutes. Neither is perfect but there's a serious difference, the other solution just use condoms …
/r/MensRights01/12/21 09:03 PM
5

Awwww so they want to make sure people act like a herd or robots and don't question orders or their superiors. The whole reason why I wouldn't join, luckily in my country there isn't a mandatory subscription. Thanks for the explanation makes a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 09:05 PM
0

Now I'm curious why dying is an issue. Worried that someone might dye it neons colours and give away your position?
/r/MensRights27/10/21 08:48 PM
1

Sure deflect and assume the other person didn't mean it that way ... Typical behaviour, supposed jokes at the expense of others generally get plenty of upvotes and serious comments that actually have substance and contribute to the topics usually have less upvotes. (Not talking about my comments but the top voted comment in many threads/posts)
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 06:50 PM
0

I said Twitter, Instagram, and tiktok. Let's see we still have Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, specific forums, Facebook, Google groups, Quora. Sure keep making assumptions and claims ;) Still you avoid what the person above me said and implied which my reply was about. You don't have to care but if someone says if you don't use X you don't know an entire sex below age Y then you're making a lot of assumptions and claims. So tell me how are you going to defend that claim?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 06:07 PM
0

Why use SC when there's plenty of other options for dedicated messaging and thus sharing pictures 🤷🏻‍♂️ Also that's how SC promoted their app ... Telegram, signal, WhatsApp, Wickr The assumption though that if you don't have SC you don't know an entire sex of a certain age is preposterous. Which is what the person above me said. Maybe all Americans use it, I don't know, however I still think even that's not the case. The way the person said it, it sounds like it's used by many people, women to s…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 05:41 PM
-1

People claiming/assuming things they don't know anything about, okay?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 05:01 PM
-8

Hmmmm sure you can tell my GF 🤣 I don't see the pint in SC, first of all it provides nothing but apparent safety not actual safety. Also if I want to receive, send, or share pictures I do not see the point in using SC. The idea that SC keeps any pictures safe is the dumbest thing ever, and anyone who believes that is naïve and understands nothing about technology. Damn even you don't underestand technology, someone could always use another phone to take a picture of the screen. I don't use Snapc…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 03:54 PM
7

I don't use Snapchat and I know tinder, bumble, etc can have different looks between both. Snapchat you might be right about as I have no clue since I don't see a point in using it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 12:10 PM
57

Aahhhh that explains thanks Thought this was on iPhone or something
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 12:04 PM
5

Possibly, I don't use Snapchat and don't have iPhone. I asked for a reason ;p
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 12:04 PM
-63

Why are you're on a dating app if you're happily taken? Or isn't this tinder or bumble or something?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/21 11:57 AM
32

Don't delete the texts you got, if they press charges, provide it as proof as you replying to something someone else send you while you did not give them your phone number ( the sister). A text in your phone is stronger evidence than someone saying something they can't proof.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:21 AM
26

Reddit is very polarised often and people generalise to quickly. These generalisations happen a lot on Reddit, both against men and women
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:17 AM
6

To be fair it's Wikipedia, which has many mods like on Reddit receiving money from outside sources.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 09:56 PM
25

Actually I think this is better Politicians lie and bullshit too much
/r/MensRights15/10/21 05:15 PM
1

Doesn't matter if it increases, it will become clear at some point at which point they can accept it or cry \o/ Women have a much higher drive for kids and a family then most men anyway and are much more likely to be unhappy. As long as idiots don't start blaming others and pushing the blame on people that didn't do shit, then I couldn't care. It's like with the radicals from FDS, their problem if they end up alone and often end up relatively poor or below average economically. Like it's very ha…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:53 PM
2

Well let them burn their fingers \o/ Have stupid standards and you'll end up with nothing or something much worse then you could have had \o/
/r/MensRights26/09/21 04:46 PM
17

Something about unrealistic standards and romanticising real Life as if it's some movie where they are a princess and a prince will marry them and solve all their problems. Nonetheless their problem not mine 🤣😂 The thing is men actually get better chances when they get a bit older, for women, generally after 30 it becomes only harder and harder. In the end their loss and problem if they end up old and alone.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:22 AM
1

I mean is gender a biological or a mental trait, because in biology we have something called sex, genotype or phenotype, both not really gender that's a human mental thing.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 12:18 PM
1

Can we provide her with some sources for the statements in her picture? If we provide people with the right sources/evidence it will be much harder to deny.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:35 AM
0

No there are reasons why not everything is allowed and that's specifically so companies that have near monopolies can't force consumers into tight spots or ridiculous situations. Same as how it prevents other BS, that would allow for a ton of other shit, prevents (easy) money laundering, prevent the abuse of prostitutes that were said they would be dancers especially foreign one, prevent child pornography in a small part, and probably many other shit things I haven't thought about yet (prevent h…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:02 PM
0

Nope it doesn't, see my killing example, at least not here.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:02 PM
1

Don't know how it works in the US, but here in most of western EU I know that contracts can not have certain things if they go against regular legislation/law which can either make it entirely null and void, or just that section/part. Like I can not write that I would be allowed to kill you, should you break the contract. I use this just as a very obvious example. However I've sometimes seen things in a contract that I simply know won't hold up legally (contracts from companies even). However si…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:44 AM
2

People only see the positive thing people forget all the negatives. They want to blame 9tgers for their own problems vagd mistakes, so that they don't have to take responsibility and can have others solve their problems for them. I think that's at least part of it, men are just easier targets and not as easily offended and people apparently take advantage of it. At least I think this is a part of the issue.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:22 PM
5

If everyone thinks it's pointless and few people report it will never work. I get your argument and where you are coming from and it's true not much might happen, as I also mentioned. Nonetheless it's also takes less than 1 or 2 minutes to report. Lastly what good world-wide or EU alternatives are there, because as far as I know there aren't any good ones that have gained traction in the EU at the moment. If you know some I would love to hear them. If they are mostly just used in the US then it …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 05:13 PM
15

Just wanted to post this here should you feel like giving those mods a bit of shot because they were inconsistent, unclear, or hypocrite. If it was not in their rules you can report the mods, probably won't do much until a lot of people start doing it. Not in their rules breaks moderator guideline 4 I believe guideline 8 talks about not taking your appeal seriously. You can report mods if they broke any of the moderator guidelines:https://www.reddit.com/r/banned/comments/9h8t7u/reddit_now_has_a_…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/21 02:04 PM
1

No matter what you say if you ingest less calories than your body burns you lose weight, and if you ingest more you gain weight. Basics of weight loss. However tell me how all those factors impact weight loss, quantify for me the effects within the 95 CI borders and the effects of those things. Do those things require you to do something else besides ingesting less calories to lose weight, yes or no? If yes then please explain me the mechanism behind it and how it completely prevents you losing …
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/21 01:38 PM
1

Easier as in less time and effort but yes it also depends on your body type. Nonetheless gaining weight by muscles will objectively take more active time, as loosing weight requires just eating less. That's not an active investment of time or far from as much as you need with doing exercise. Watching what and how you eat you also need to do when bulking (building muscle mass). Thus I see it as more effort that needs to be put in. It's true what's easier can be different from person to person, al…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 04:18 PM
16

Literally if you look at a man and a woman who you would think look equally fit then the woman will have a higher fat percentage. What that means is that women will look less fat with a higher fat percentage than men. So technically women store a bit more fat but in practice it doesnt matter and it is just as easy if not easier (less time consuming) to stay in shape than men. Especially if people expect men to build muscle which is much harder, as it not only takes more time but also more effort…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/21 01:47 PM
15

Like who the fuck would believe a man would want to even touch this ugly pig 😂🤣 My defense, I wouldn't sleep with the bitch to begin with, if she accused me I would laugh at them in court and ask them if they really think I would willingly touch such an ugly person. Maybe for 10 million €/£ I would consider it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/07/21 11:04 AM
2

No it wasn't snarky XD I appreciate corrections that are straightforward, clear, and concise ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/21 10:07 AM
1

Yeah but it's stupid that the law makes such a nonsense statement. And thx for the correction I meant ministers in general. This kind of stuff just really pissess me off because of the implications and problems it can create.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/21 08:02 AM
1

Great let's have all the prime ministers fucked by fucking machines and it won't be called rape 🤬
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 11:42 PM
1

So if you force kids to jack you off and eat out your asshole, they aren't raped? If a little boy has his penis unwillingly stroked/sucked it isn't rape? Fucking BS from the UK government and stupid. Maybe let's grab the prime ministers and pee and cum on their faces, forcing them to keep their mouth open with these open gags, let's see if they still don't consider it rape. Such utter fucking BS and as sexist and stupid as it gets.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 11:40 PM
8

Well next time I'm in court I'm a trans woman who's genderfluid 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 06:03 PM
3

Do you have a link to the study/studies that showed this? I believe those numbers especially the 70% is really high, even the 30%. I do believe biologically it makes sense for men to reproduce more to spread their genes. However I do believe that's mostly people with little self-control. We also don't just kill people anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/21 01:42 PM
14

That's annoying because then it isn't a pussypassdenied ;p
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/21 11:27 AM
4

Bot shows a number that's too low for sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/21 03:48 PM
4

Honestly give her the same punishment the guy would have gotten if he was found guilty of the worst she claimed, taking slander into consideration. Purposeful false accusations of murder then if the person would have gotten life long now will you. Same story with rape the guy would have gotten 10 years, now you get 10. It's that simple, you try to ruin someone's life, get yours ruined. Simple easy clear cut repercussion.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:25 AM
1

Exactly, those women are alright overal.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 12:56 AM
2

Hahhaha, that's a fun comment ;) Not upset more confused. Text is hard to get because there's no tone or facial expression. So jokes or sarcasm are hard to read. Anyway were are the brits?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/05/21 12:56 AM
1

Do you have a scientific source for that, it was probably researched.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:59 PM
1

Yes specific subreddits are cancerous, just as FDS I hate those people Those are not feminists just people "CLAIMING* they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:56 PM
0

Yes but not everything people think is correct. Opinions are not always logical nor reasonable. There's a reason science doesn't work on them. You can try to keep purposely pull my replies/arguments completely out of context, still won't make you right ;) And I can see that enough people are indeed prone to experience Dunnig-Kruger.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:29 PM
2

Didn't I talk about the dumb little bimbos?I specifically said "True feminists" According to Oxford languages (dictionary), feminism means the following:"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. "https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Definition+feminism Equality in my dictionary is still equality, fully and completely. So if people want equality I'm happy to give it but only fully. The actual feminists I've met and talked to believe the same, it's generally these people…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:18 PM
0

Nope never said that, however nor do the results from the US constitute the truth. I just can't give an accurate recount on what would happen in the US as I don't live their, don't know the moral and culture values well enough, nor the political believes and the intricacies of the US. Let alone if I would have to consider the differences between different states. However if you make a claim women do this, and assuming we are talking about women in general, then the burden of proof is on you, to …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:12 PM
-1

Well I'm sorry to hear your mom and grandmothers were like that, that's sad. Karen phenomenon is I think an US term. Men getting crucified for that is completely ridiculous and just as fucking BS, however where do you see that happening mostly? Again I don't see that happening all that much, also we were talking about women treating it like a buffet, not about what society does. However I'm starting to feel there are some serious differences between the US and at least the Netherlands and severa…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:08 PM
4

Never said it was better. Learn to read, I said I don't know the US, as in I don't well enough to judge and things MIGHT be different there. I did say IF this was true for the MAJORITY of women in the US, then yes the US WOULD be messed up.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:03 PM
2

Dude that's my point, I'm for equality, as equal as it gets. (that's what true feminists are, the old-school ones) same tests for everyone in the army, a man being able to punch a woman just as much as you can punch any other man. These feminists you are talking about are these current age "self-proclaimed" feminists that aren't actual feminists.Same wages for the same amount of work, same voting rights, equal amounts of hours worked when you live together, etc, etc. Again I hate these women(peo…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 10:01 PM
2

If science worked that way we would still be in the stone age XD We would still believe that the universe and solar system revolve around the earth instead of the earth revolving around the sun. We would still believe that if we went up high enough in the sky we could reach the heavens (tower of Babel). I trust a dictionary much more than 10 or a 100 random internet strangers that can not even provide actual logical arguments and use fallacies to try and prove their points.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:56 PM
0

Downvotes are opinions. I do not give a fuck about opinions but about logical arguments XD Down nor upvotes don't proof shit, you believing that says more than enough about how irrational and illogical you are. People not wanting to admit a truth is not my problem, that's just people being irrational. Edit, btw just about every definition I could find in online dictionaries agrees with me that in this context, general means a majority or the bulk. Not the minority. However sure, the 10 or even 1…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:44 PM
-2

Did I say I agree with any of the complete and utter idiots that make those BS claims. I give women just as much shit about it as I would give any men. Also I'm not on twitter because it's a stupid media, at least in my opinion. Also is that mostly twitter for the US possibly? How is this down-voting equal treating, when 1 I'm a man/guy, 2 I'm addressing an over-generalization issue (a fallacy also often called hasty generalization). I do believe that what you said can definitely contribute to t…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:41 PM
-15

Because most guys that come in contact with "feminists" come in contact with the self-proclaimed variety that yells really loudly they are a feminist. On top of that we are in a sub with a greater percentage of misogynistic people. I'm not that surprised but I do find it alarming that people (here but also other places) have trouble distinguishing and generalize things so quickly and easily.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:26 PM
-1

You're talking about modern feminists who yell really hard they are feminists. I work in science, exact sciences, the women and men I've worked with worked equally well in general. In my studies there have been a few people that I was disgusted by, 2 women and 3 men, which considering I was exposed to well over a a few hundred that makes it even/equal to me. Do note never studied in the US but did study with people from the US. Edit (and grammar),. Yes men are much more capable physically and te…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:13 PM
-1

You would have to ask them 2 questions, if they want true equality and your question. I'll tell you now where I live, less than 1 in 2 women will say yes to both questions. (Netherlands) This was about women treating equality like a buffet, not women not always wanting equality. Important distinction to make. Again I don't live in the US and the US does not constitute the entire world. I can also not have a great idea of moral and cultural values in the US as I can only perceive it through socia…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:09 PM
0

Does it? It says women do, if you want to generalise a group I would think you should have to talk about the majority. The voice of the community is an intangible concept and can not be quantified, is vague, and completely open to personal interpretation. Do you have any source that shows this or proves this or goes more in depth about this. Preferably a scientific source or otherwise a source that uses logical arguments and doesn't rely about fallacies or any other irrationality or emotional ar…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 09:00 PM
-2

Damn now I need to look up some words 😅
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:30 PM
2

What is this post and image talking about? Insurances for men and women aged 17-24? Or insurances for all men and women? It gave a good indication and still does, that you are not willing to see that is not my problem. Again let me ask: What search term did you use? Did you use an unbiased search term? Next time I'll try be much more explicit and specific.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:25 PM
1

I told you give me the link to the scientific source or an actual rapport, the one that the article is talking about is fine, they just don't link to it. Because I can find any statistics I won't and by using some clever tricks and wording show basically whatever readers want to read. Not that complicated I told you multiple times I wanted the link to the scientific literature that they got this data from.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:22 PM
1

Nope didn't shift them, the image is talking about drivers aged 17-24. So that's what I am addressing. As those are also the most expensive insurances anyway. I was addressing the image that was posted and why those insurances were more expensive for men. As there weren't other claims that were made.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:19 PM
-44

So more than 1 in 2, more than 50%? I hate women that do this, but I don't see a majority do this. Sure a significant proportion which can be frustrating and ridiculous. Also keep in mind I live in the EU not in the US, maybe in the US it's different but that would mean the US is really messed up.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:17 PM
-23

I still don't see how the MAJORITY does this. Majority means over 50% I do not see more than 1 in 2 women in my life do this. Nor in any reasonable places, except some fucked up subreddits or some other fucked up places on social media. So sure you are talking generally, however where the fuck do you live that more than every 1 in 2 women you know/meet does this?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:15 PM
-1

They are not illogical nor really far-fetched. Again as I said it isn't perfect but the result if you look it up will be similar. Again keep in mind I'm talking about young men/women 18-25 (or 16-25, maybe up to 30). Also I know companies care about achieving maximum profits, so in a competitive market you know that their prices are unbiased. That's why am so sure about it. I don't even need to look up the studies because generally companies will do everything they are allowed for maximum profit…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:12 PM
0

Yeah and now link to the actual scientific study instead of a mediocre source. I think I also said YOUNG men nor are all accidents equal to an insurance company. (Costs matters) I'm also wondering what search term you used? Did you use an unbiased search term? This has been shown over and over again already maybe something changed in the last 10 years or so but I highly doubt it that young women are more expensive than young men for insurance companies. These companies base their costs on the ac…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:08 PM
-71

*some women Definitely not all women do this, I had two great grandmothers and I have a great mom. They never did something so stupid nor would they. Does your mom do that, or your does/did your grandma do that? Sorry far from all, however self proclaimed feminists just yell the loudest and make the most noise. I really don't like those kind of feminists because they aren't even feminists. They are like vegans who think they are significantly helping the environment.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 08:00 PM
-6

Plenty of other studies that addres it directly. Still proofs the point, as most accidents and fatalities happen with the driver,most people drive alone. It shouldn't skew the statistics too much and the accident caused by sex shouldn't vary that much. Fatalities also immediately only addresses the biggest accidents that are the most expensive and problematic. Sure it's not a direct comparison but should give a good indication. It's literally the first study I found googling it. You also have in…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:54 PM
3

Young men tend to be more reckless, you know the idiots that overtake people at almost twice the speed limit. That's mostly men. Young men tend to be more confident than women but also more overconfident/arrogant than women. We're talking about small percentages here, but when you deal with millions of people those small percentages add up to big numbers. Plenty of studies done on this, here's one of them https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/P…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:42 PM
-19

No you're confusing the dumb little bimbo's that scream that they're feminists and everyone has to know that they're a feminist. True feminists just want equality, I am a feminist ;) (Ps before you get confused I'm a guy) I've met several women who are actually feminists, great people, also won't talk about it until the subject comes up in conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:37 PM
48

It's not equality, it's people looking to profit/benefit 🤣 But yeah I also hate those kind of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/21 07:34 PM
0

What's being denied here and what am I seeing? Maybe this is better off in r/fakefeminism ?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 02:45 PM
1

Subbed and r/birthofasub
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 01:53 AM
1

It's unlikely to happen due to people's education (lack of critical thinking, logical reasoning and understanding discussions), human psychology, and every social media platform wanting as many users and as much engagement as possible (because more advertisers). So most social media either ends up in echo chambers or in polarisation, both which are extremely horrible for societies. Because that provides the most engagement and retainment of users. People take things too personal. I'm sorry but I…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 01:21 AM
1

Is there a sub for this stuff that isn't too extreme or too misogynistic?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 01:02 AM
1

I suggest you check this post and subreddit out regarding that mod ;) https://www.reddit.com/r/banned/comments/9h8t7u/reddit_now_has_a_form_to_report_bad_moderators (This should take you about 5, maybe 10 minutes) https://www.reddit.com/r/banned (Yes you can file complaints regarding mods)
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 01:00 AM
2

I tried once with an account, wasn't that hard but of course you immediately get banned if you oppose anything 🤣😅 They're self-delusion, the problem of echo chambers. I don't think most of them actually understand logical reasoning or maybe they're just looking for an easy scapegoat, men in this case. It's interesting how Reddit is willing to ban a lot of racist subs or quarantine a lot is subs but not this one. In the end, in my opinion, you either allow discrimination or you don't. So you're e…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/21 12:57 AM
1

I suggest you check this post and subreddit out regarding that mod ;) https://www.reddit.com/r/banned/comments/9h8t7u/reddit_now_has_a_form_to_report_bad_moderators (This should take you about 5, maybe 10 minutes) https://www.reddit.com/r/banned
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 08:25 PM
2

I kinda agree but that can be changed. Any idea for subs where it would be fitting to post this that aren't too extreme or too misogynistic.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 08:21 PM
3

Make an alt account, no need to define your gender.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 08:19 PM
1

Check out this post https://www.reddit.com/r/banned/comments/9h8t7u/reddit_now_has_a_form_to_report_bad_moderators/
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/21 07:10 PM
1

I get your argument and sentiment completely. However if people don't try then we don't know if things have changed or will change. Also if most people think it won't change and they won't try then the chances of things changing will be even smaller. Juries are a bit weird anyway to me and the way they get chosen in the US. Often the people in the jury don't look at things objectively but seem to involve personal emotions, experiences, and opinions, which honestly don't really belong in court th…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/04/21 08:23 AM
3

How can you be so sure that she would just get a slap on the wrists. Also not a lawyer, but I'm sure there are a few things he could sue her for, some whigh are considered crimes. Laws are different from country to country and since I'm not from the US I don't know which law would do what exactly 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/21 10:33 PM
31

He should sue her not for money but for false allegations, defamation, etc, trying to get her jail time. She probably doesn't have the money anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/04/21 09:24 PM
2

Yeah I just saw I pasted the wrong link 😅
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 11:09 PM
1

Thanks I copied and pasted the wrong link😅
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 11:08 PM
3

Here you can read it, this is why I love immutability https://www.removeddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/aqge4p/aita_for_distancing_myself_from_my_bf_after_he/
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 01:15 PM
1

Find better women/girlfriends 😘 They are out there, even if they are not the norm.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 01:13 PM
4

Yeah that usually works the best and I respect mods like that a lot ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 10:19 PM
3

I disagree I like pineapple on my pizza 😂😘
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:32 PM
12

I believe there's a way but I'll have to look it up when I'm on my pc, comment here if i haven't provided an answer by Friday. Update/edit: https://www.reddit.com/r/banned/comments/9h8t7u/reddit_now_has_a_form_to_report_bad_moderators/
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:17 PM
18

Forcing people to choose sides is a red flag for imbeciles. It's literally the first thing to do to polarise a topic and society. If you say dumb stuff like, "you're either with us or against us" then I immediately think you're an absolute moron. So I get your point, it's very valid, and it's fun to annoy those kinds of people 🤣
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:15 PM
11

Keep in mind I don't think FDS can be compared to pussypassdenied. They are the type of people that dare to call themselves feminists while they're just looking for maximum benefit out of guys. They don't want equality but female superiority and maximum benefits with as little effort as possible. Actual feminists are disgusted by the type of behaviour they display. So while they focus on actively strategizing on how to fuck men over or exploit them. This sub focuses on the denial of females expl…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:12 PM
4

Some people are sad and believe that their OPINIONS are superior. Even if opinions are just that, opinions they aren't superior just different, however many mods don't understand rationality and logic 🤷🏻‍♂️ There are many power tripping mods because you don't gain that many benefits, so most mods fall into 1 of 2 categories, either they are passionate and interested in a subject but keep their personal opinions out of modding or either they are power hungry even if they don't realise it themselv…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/21 09:00 PM
1

Owww that I would 100% agree on. First come first served, wait on a bench for the next bus or get a cab if you're in a hurry.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 11:51 PM
1

I do but you do realize that in many western countries we have an extremely graying population which is also a huge issue.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 11:36 PM
1

Not wise I have a lot experience with discussions, thank my parents and (slightly younger) brother. Very open family, others who aren't as straightforward and open think we are actually fighting/arguing 🤣😂 Just practice and have discussions with people open to it. Not debates and not "fights", you're entitled to your opinion but you have to be open to be wrong. Just because you think differently or have different opinions doesn't mean you can't be friends, plenty of friends that I also have disc…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 11:49 AM
4

Ignorance and stupidity, at least in my opinion ;p Because they are too lazy, don't have the capacity, or can't handle facts and accept that the world isn't necessarily fair. It's easy to give arguments based on your beliefs and opinions because no one can tell you're wrong nor proof you're wrong. With facts they can be proven wrong 🤷🏻‍♂️ For a lot of people that is humiliating however the best way of learning is from your mistakes and by being corrected.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 11:29 AM
55

As the other reply said. Don't give a fuck about what other people think and irrational or emotional arguments. Keep calm, cool, use reason and logic. You get a pet dog, that's your choice, you get a baby it's your choice. I tend to get up for pregnant women but I'm fairly young and we kind od need babies for the population not to die out. Still the man is right, she choose to get a baby, morning after pill and abortion were options. She could also pay for a cab or have her man drive her to work…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/21 08:18 AM
1

It's called overcompensation in my dictionary. A small minority complains how similar people to them in the past have been undervalued and not treated equally, which is true. However this minority then also keeps yelling at everything and claiming anything is unequal as long as they don't actually BENEFIT. The problem society is fucking dumb enough to actually listen to them and accept this.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/21 12:03 PM
0

Yeah I see you keep avoiding serious questions. Or maybe you're just incapable of understanding them, hard to say 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/21 11:04 AM
1

I don't know, I've no clue about the exact laws in the US nor UK. Laws can vary wildly from country to country. However I do know even if a public prosecutor doesn't do it you can generally still bring up the charges in most countries or report it to the police (or specific instances) and then often they have to do something with it. I would have tried to sue this type of person and would have asked for huge ass compensation or tried getting her into jail, not because she's a girl, no because I …
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 10:19 PM
2

Sorry but if it's an obvious set-up, as was very clear here, then it shouldn't matter. Also that's already really downplaying it as this can be life-ruining as if the guy was an adult it could mean serious jail time. So I don't get that. If you know someone has abused you what do you have to worry about when coming forward? In my country, you're innocent until proven guilty, that works both ways, so it's not like someone has to proof they didn't make false accusations. And it's really hard to sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 08:04 PM
1

Lol 🤣 Sorry but why would I want to go on a date with you 😂 I'll quote you my comment again since you still avoided answering the questions. I said and asked this: I agree with her as well. Especially with tinder dates. Also I think once you've said you paid something you shouldn't really go back on your word. Don't give/pay things if you're not okay with giving it as a gift at that moment and have expectations. However if you don't like this sub and think it's a place for hating on women then w…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 06:47 PM
0

So when I ask serious questions you seem to avoid them, good to know (as 26 min ago you replied to multiple other comments here that didn't require you to answer, possibly difficult questions).
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 06:38 PM
7

Maybe because the guy doesn't want it or doesn't know about it or maybe because his lawyer was mweh and didn't tell him about it 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 05:19 PM
30

Isn't, falsely accusing people on purpose and setting people up, a serious crime. As far as I know that's really illegal and can lead to jail time.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 04:24 PM
1

I agree with her as well. Especially with tinder dates. Also I think once you've said you paid something you shouldn't really go back on your word. Don't give/pay things if you're not okay with giving it as a gift at that moment and have expectations. However if you don't like this sub and think it's a place for hating on women then why are you even on this sub? How did you even find her post, since it required you to scroll down? The only way you would, normally, see this post is if you have jo…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/21 02:15 PM
85

These are the type of girls who are full of equality until they get punched 😂🤣 You want equality, here you have it.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/21 01:16 PM
8

Should have gone to the cops, would be a hell of fun to see them have to face the police, as they could face serious charges. Especially since you probably had a bunch of info on her. Did you meet up in public or did she invite you somewhere, just curious?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/21 08:24 PM
2

My younger brother, pretty ripped 1.91m or 1.92, was still not able to get to 100kg, got to about 95 kg at most (maybe 98 but stuck under 100). 100kg is a shit ton, any girl being 100kg, nope sorry. They are fat and UNHEALTHY as fuck, or they are relatively tall and do some bodybuilder stuff, which is simply not my type, a tiny bit of muscles sure, stronger than me sure, looking too muscular and manly not my type 🤣😂
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/21 05:18 PM
4

I was also wondering this No word needs to be banned, don't be so overly sensitive and get a tougher skin. PC has reached new highs in society 🤦😭 (PC= political correctness)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/21 12:04 AM
1

I don't think the UAE would willingly take that risk, lived in the country for a few years. If they show something publicly they're pretty smart about it. A 16 year old would be too great of a risk, an 18 year old not. Lots of models and pornstars try to look younger and closer to 18 on purpose.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 04:40 PM
1

Well that probably depends on which rules you go by. In most European countries you're treated as an adult when you're 18, UAE (dubai) has the same age as the US were it's 21. So none of these girls are under age in theor own countries anymore (so not to their standards). However I'm willing to bet 1 or 2 might be under 21. However no one is going to bitch about 18 year olds in general, unless there's a very strict bouncer somewhere (because they are good looking models so 🤷🏻‍♂️).
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/21 03:52 PM
2

What does that mean? What are you trying to say with 1 word "Shut"?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 08:55 PM
11

This looks like a meme and not a real thing or news report. If OP linked to a news article then sure this would have made a good post. However since it could as well be fake and is hard to verify, this is a stupid post and thus I agree with the reply the person above you gave. Not sure if you meant the reply was trash or this entire post as that was hard to get from your reply. Edit, grammar thus!=those 😅
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/21 08:15 PM
2

Not going to disagree XD Have seen a lot of people do dumb shit just for fame. I still don't get who follows these kinds of idiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 12:05 PM
1

This whole thing. This show and video just feel staged. I just saw a comment from someone that's also said it was staged, for clout or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 11:02 AM
63

That edit confirms my suspicions, thank you.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 10:46 AM
6

It looks kinda staged though. It looks a bit fake but hey I don't speak the language.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/21 10:43 AM
41

Lol okay so if I don't like the police checking my stuff or investigating me, I can just walk away or shoot them? Lol in that case whats the point of police 🤣😂
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/21 10:59 PM
1

Come visit the Netherlands 😘😜
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 11:08 PM
3

Okay thanks for the clarification, that's how it came across to me 👍 Makes more sense ;)
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/21 04:33 PM
3

Yes but any long-term couple knows there are always moments or things the other doesn't get from time to time and sometimes one just makes a stupid joke. I agree her reaction should have never been that way especially if they are a couple. However I feel that you're romanticising relationships too much. You're not connected to the hip with your SO, you wont always understand each other, especially not perfectly, and you want always agree either or laugh at all of each others jokes. That's movies…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/21 04:30 PM
6

I hope because of her reaction, not because she doesn't get a joke once.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/21 04:02 PM
1

My comment was more in regards to, that this isn't about height/weight, but more about how she went out of her way to insult someone. I was wondering if you can understand that and would agree with it or would have valid arguments to disagree with that. Not about winning (at least not for me). Also never try winning on Reddit against the popular opinion of a specific sub, Reddit is in the end one big circle jerk of subreddits 🤣😂 Even when you provide solid arguments and scientific sources, peopl…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 08:34 PM
2

No comments u/LowKeyVelmaBabe ?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/21 11:19 PM
1

u/repostsleuthbot
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/21 05:24 PM
3

The problem isn't so much people having preferences and not dating people because of X The problem in this specific message is that she knew his height, as stated in his profile, she proceeds to sweep right on him. However she then goes on to insult him and tell h he's not good enough because of something she already knew. Basically she goes out of her way to insult someone for no reason. I don't date "fat" people however I also don't walk up to them, start a convo, simply to tell them they are …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/21 05:15 PM
1

It's called people having double standards and being hypocrites. These are the type of women that claim they're feminist, want equal rights, and often say they're independent. However these type of women are nothing both hypocrites and opportunists, they only want the benefits not the downsides, that's not equality. You thinking a man should pay for you, fine then that man can think that you should do all household chores and that he's the boss of the house, right? (You want to keep some culture…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/21 12:39 AM
1

I hope so too but probably ain't going to happen.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 10:49 PM
2

Yeah gotta agree with you mostly at that. Other scenarios are plausible but very unlikely, considering the money and possible resources involved. Maybe if there's awakening, good luck with education mostly controlled by the people in charge, in the overall population but it's a race between society and PR/psychology/(AI), with knowing where 80% of the global wealth is, ... Meaning a revolution or war would be the most likely unfortunately. Again Communism and capitalism are great ideas in theory…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 10:48 PM
25

Not only that. Your competing in a global market as most countries, even the poorest are starting to get a decent connection to the internet. Now with the large differences in currency values don't expect to be able to do this in most modern countries when you aren't working in a Niche. People in Brazil, Columbia, many poor Asian countries and probably other places have a much lower average income than in most of the US and EU. So for them 5$/€ is more maybe 5 times or even in some cases 10 time…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 04:16 PM
12

I just always check my pockets first as soon as I get "groped" by anyone. I've been to different countries with quite varying culture, however if you go clubbing you can get groped by anyone XD I just feel my pockets because I know in certain countries it's a trick to get money of drunk people, especially tourists. A friend has had it happen before, especially when you're alone and it's a group that's just a bit too friendly. I've also been groped by guys before 🤣 In the end I think people shoul…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/21 08:57 PM
1

If you don't want to have the discussion, then don't talk about it and then reply without reading any of the resources. Simply to show that you have your reasons. Sure his statement is exaggerated and out of proportion, but good luck writing it in less than 8 or 10 words. None of yours also address keeping the masks clean and how people actually use their masks. As I said people don't wash there masks every day. Anyway I am going to read your second source as I am interested to see what they say…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/20 06:42 PM
1

Virus is not BS nor did the video say that. Read his last paper: No science No shutdown Now I don't know the exact situation in the US but I do know it where I live. Plenty of scientists have already addressed several topics and problems with those. It's the measures that are being enforced about which people are worried might cause more overall harm than if we wouldn't impose those (or changed them). Where I live there still hasn't been a SOP (standard operating procedure) for the PCR test or a…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/20 05:23 PM
1

TFM? I don't know what it stands for I'm talking about the YouTube video. They have to say it's illegal, however this video was not made by the sellers. They literally say it's not very useful and won't protect you. They recommend against it literally. You can say it's not legal and still be positive about the device or talk about the possible benefits. These guys are kinda bashing the product. Not sure why a seller would KNOWINGLY link/embed that.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/20 05:18 PM
0

Have you watched that YouTube video?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/20 04:30 PM
12

The best part of that website/shop is that in the YouTube demonstration video they recommend against it for home defense 😂 https://youtu.be/_SSdLQcGEio
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/20 12:57 PM
62

That's sad. Society sometimes ...
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/20 04:01 AM
1

You haven't even provided a source. Since I'm not sure what languages you speak let's look at the English law Encouraging or assisting a crime is itself a crime in English law, by virtue of the Serious Crime Act 2007. Wiki article Herring, Jonathan (2008). Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Materials (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-923432-5. Ps, before 2007 a different law dealt with it as you can read here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incitement Incitement was an offence under …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 05:14 PM
1

If you're so sure and it's so easy to look up (which it's not really) then why don't link to a reference where it's explained. Just because people don't get dragged into court or don't get thrown in jail doesn't mean it's legal.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 04:29 AM
1

Good reply and argument ... Like seriously, but sure law is the same in every country around the world and lack of knowledge equates stupidity. Where I live, if you claim you have committed and such a crime was committed recently in your area then your own word will be used as evidence that you commited that crime. For certain crimes they will even open a case if you claim you did something criminal. I'm not talking about instigation of crime or violence. I'm talking about people saying they com…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/20 04:19 AM
1

That's even weirder as that's considered hate speech and instigation to violence, 100% suite it's illegal by law. Generally acted against unless it's the government themselves of course. I thought that was illegal in the US as well. Just because nothing has been done against it recently doesn't mean that it's actually legal. Correct me if I'm wrong though however I really thought instigation to violence, officially, is also illegal in the US.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 05:26 PM
1

That's weird because generally if you admit to being guilty then you are considered guilty. As a confession is considered enough evidence in general. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you get to lie to the police and obstruct their investigation, you making false claims, even on social media is considered such obstruction as it can cause all sorts of weird scenario's. At least where I'm from. Now I don't know the exact details but that's generally the gist of it. You don't need to file a police rep…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 05:21 PM
2

Yeah as far as I know, in the Netherlands as well. I'm surprised it's not a thing or not acted upon much in the US with so many people thinking it's funny to get clout.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 09:28 AM
10

Isn't there a law in the US that if you falsely confess on purpose that you get a fine or jail time? (Interference or something) Would at least stop idiots from doing such things.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 09:16 AM
5

Damn saw some troubling things in there. Queendom and being a queen 🤦 - Giving no second chances. - Not listening to anyone who hasn't proven their worthiness. Like really. My god I hope they are treated exactly the same as they are advocating. Not that it will open their eyes, I hope it does, but it will be damn funny to see.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 10:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter