TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OGHuggles Archive

View 5 posts and 127 comments by OGHuggles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This guy is just getting off to cuck fantasies, it isn't real lol. Just gotta read the descriptions to find that out, or his comments, or his post history.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/20 05:11 PM
1

Ya it is for like 99% of men. I'm sure there's a few girls that it is like that too but it just isn't the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 08:32 PM
0

If food/money are a problem for you as a girl you find a mate that is a great provider. If they are not a problem you find a mate with the best genes. If you are a super lucky attractive western girl you find a mate that is a great provider, has the best genes, and that you actually like as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 01:43 PM
1

Skills are part of what makes someone attractive though, so you're still proving the point somewhat. If you used to have sex all the time with someone and all of a sudden it dies down...either she's on loads of hormonal manipulating drugs, she's in menopause, or you're not attractive to her anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 01:33 PM
1

The main general difference (as in ofc lots of exceptions) is that men wouldn't react that way with a girl he was physically attracted to even if she was the biggest scumbag in the world. Women can have a high/low sex drive. Men can have a high/low sex drive. However imo it is very common among men that after a certain point they need to have sex to the extent that they significantly lower their standards or get rid of them and most women aren't really like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 01:31 PM
1

Almost anyone can get plastic surgery if they really wanted it. Especially for smaller things like nose jobs or botox. Furthermore there are literally millions of attractive people that are not famous with incredible genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:37 PM
2

Good stories tho lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:13 PM
14

The mere fact that you are friends with an attractive girl can do a lot for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:07 PM
1

There's lots of older people with money who look good
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 04:42 AM
1

what is a cat carousel
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 04:30 AM
0

I can't tell if this is a satire account or not lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 04:29 AM
1

If ur boyfriend cheats on u play this in a car then go to the bar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxEPV4kolz0 Film it, upload to tik tok, then make an only fans and sell ur bathwater.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:09 AM
3

This https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cphNpqKpKc4 or this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4i9u_hucAUs
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:03 AM
3

Everything is choice ofc, it's when people show like overt disgust that I just find them to be very cruel and in the wrong. Men do this with moms way too much. And women do this with ugly guys way too much. I'm mid 20s and have slept with 30 year old women with kids. Still hot and still acted youthful. People are just like way too judgemental imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 02:00 AM
4

That you know of...*dramatic piano music*
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 01:44 AM
2

Party because of society, men are becoming emasculated progressively overtime. Lacking confidence to approach girls, becoming weaker, etc. Also women are way more cautious about who they sleep with because the risks are much higher. Girls have to worry about getting pregnant and taking care of the kid. If you take a guy with average genetics. If he works out and gets cut and has confidence and approaches tons of girls he can get laid quite a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:56 AM
3

No one can read minds but people can suspect things and women in general are a lot better at suspecting people's motives than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:46 AM
2

Because the average man is average lmao. Average looks, average career, average personality. A lower count would not be due to a lack of trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:44 AM
2

Most girls dont sleep with anymore than like 10 dudes in their life. Even good looking girls dont get approached by tons of guys in person. Of those who do a minority are like acceptable. Its just a bunch of emasculated men orbiting their social media and swiping on tinder or some creeps at a bar or club who wont get anywhere with her. Ya there are actual sluts who put out sure but that is a very small number of women. Also depends on what we consider is a high n count. I think if you sleep with…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:33 AM
2

Let's be real tho there is a diff between "I want to marry him" and "I want to fuck him and have his kids." When it comes to the latter women and men are about equal when that wall hits.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 12:07 AM
5

Some men are balding at 20 haha. Men start hitting their physical peak just as quick as women. The main difference is that society and women value different traits in men than just being young athletic and strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 11:43 PM
2

what story o.o
/r/RedPillWomen13/08/20 11:35 PM
21

Idk, I think that's retarded. Depends on the woman. In general, Age 50+ is when both men and women start getting old and unattractive imo. Some guys and girls are lucky and they still got it till they are like 60+. Some are very unfortunate and start losing it in their 30s. Some are even more unfortunate and are done in their 20s.... Also different people have different physical peaks. I'm sure everyone is familiar with the ugly duckling in hs/college who starts getting really hot a bit later in…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 11:32 PM
2

If you genuinely believe you know what's right and wrong and the right way to live life you're just a narcissistic asshat no one has any business taking seriously. There are no answers everyone is different, that's the only universal. By and large ugly poor people with disabilities and limited success have shit lives and it prob sucks to be in that category. Being middle class and up and being attractive is probably one of the biggest privileges in the world. Your worldview is so insulting child…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 07:12 PM
2

You can have sex with a guy pretty fast and not be someone who just sleeps with anyone lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 06:15 PM
3

Pretending because ultimately it makes 0 sense and I get absolutely no satisfaction from helping out or caring about people who would not do the same for me. I care about my family, my friends, girls and eventually a future wife material girl and no one else. Meaning comes from providing people you care about value and having a good time and getting value in return for me. Studies suggest what you say is objectively false. Increase in income is directly proportional to the amount of freedom it a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 05:15 PM
3

The opposite happened. I became hedonistic after pretending to not be. Most older folk I see are incredibly lonely and unhappy after buying into the crap people like you peddle lmao. The happy older guys I see are all rich and good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 05:04 PM
3

You can believe whatever you wan't doesnt make it true. I started enjoying my life a lot more when I started focusing more on my looks and making money and having fun than trying to pretend to have some noble purpose I have no incentive to care about lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 04:59 PM
2

Why are those qualities anymore valuable objectively speaking? Our primal urges exist for a reason. We are evolutionary hardwired to seek out those traits because they are useful for survival. It's pretty "ego driven" to somehow believe that your conscious thoughts are anymore valuable than hundreds of thousands of years of the evolutionary process. The truth is you're just an animal. Being a human with thoughts and feelings doesn't inherently make you anymore valuable in the universe than my pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 04:38 PM
2

Being a good guy means nothing to women because it means nothing period. It has no value in and of itself. No protection, no status, no wealth, no sexual pleasure, no excitement, nothing. Also some people are "good" not because they are genuinely good people but because they are weak or have to people please to get anyone to pay attention to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:57 PM
3

Yes single older women with kids get absolutely wayyyy too much flak honestly. Even the whole kids part. Especially when "old" is like 30 lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:54 PM
1

There is absolutely nothing wrong with girls for wanting a guy who is good-looking, wealthy, sociable, and masculine and denying a guy who lacks any or all of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:52 PM
1

Drugs have the potential to heavily shorten your lifespan and lower your quality of life. Sleeping around tons of girls at a crazy party is the easiest way to get an std Leading this lifestyle and not paying attention to your career limits your longterm freedom and value Just because someone isn't born with the perfect setup to do something doesn't mean they shouldn't do it. Most people are average and can become pretty good at a lot of skills with enough practice and research. There are lots of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:48 PM
1

Of course men should pay, but men also should not go on expensive dates almost ever as a first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 03:03 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with any of those things imo other than being social media obsessed. Idk why those are such huge hangups for guys unless they have trouble keeping a girl satisfied. Also idk anyone who isn't somewhat self-absorbed or chasing status. Those are normal human behaviors not things exclusive to girls. Also tons of guys that are way too social media obsessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/20 02:49 PM
1

That's because the reasons why people get married is very wrong a lot of the time and marriage is kind of a dumb concept to begin wtih. A LOT of women get married because it's seen as a nice thing to get married, so they pick a guy who is attractive and seems like they would be a good person to marriage. The wedding ceremony is neat and that's what they really like, but then you are supposed to stay committed to this one guy for the rest of your life and that is not as neat. Why? Because people …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 12:43 AM
1

> What helps you get ahead in the male dominance hierarchy or what helps get you laid. ​ Being dominant gets u laid, period. Dominant > Stereotypically Attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 10:28 PM
4

I've found that, generally, the only people who actually like work are self-employed or work in niche fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 10:27 PM
1

I believe that's what I was saying, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 09:58 PM
1

100% true, but I think it has more to do with subconscious drives. Men are extraordinarily competitive with each other, but if we're honest, this probably has a lot to do with evolution (well, literally everything has to do with evolution, but more specifically competition to impress a mate)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 09:54 PM
1

Bro, just think the most basic fundamental actions of any species. ​ - Eat/Drink - Fuck - Sleep - Dispose of waste ​ The point of biological life is to simply live. Nothing lives forever, the closest thing? Pass down copies of yourself. People are the only freaks that care about all this higher purpose, what is life all about thing. And even then, really only advanced societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 08:58 PM
1

That's some good science right there homie!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 10:56 PM
1

I really don't know all of these terms, lmao. ​ But ye, that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:13 PM
2

ye, the study is actually not about strength correlations and attractiveness, of course
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:34 AM
2

It's a super stupid simple study to understand. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/12/12/women-rate-the-strongest-men-as-the-most-attractive-study-finds/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:08 AM
1

But you definitely can't say that about everything. There is absolutely a set of objectively preferred characteristics and objective negatives. In so far as anything that isn't a hard science fact can be objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 11:46 PM
1

> The way I see it is simply that "red pill" attributes are simply much more primitive and fundamental whereas "blue pill" attributes are more socialized.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:48 PM
4

How does that contradict what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:46 PM
2

I think there is a distinction between aggressive/dominant behavior and rude/assholish behavior, and it may be the case that a lot of people trying to be the former actually just employ the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:44 PM
1

explain
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:39 PM
3

Why wouldn't security always take priority? Maslow's hierarchy of needs exists for a reason. Of course generally speaking if your dude is letting you spend money on designer shit and furniture you're going to tolerate a lot more from him than a mate who doesn't provide that much. And a partner that is strong and fit is just an even more primitive form of security. ​ This kind of also explains why higher status women generally speaking take a lot less shit from dudes. Because they don't need secu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:39 PM
2

The way I see it is simply that "red pill" attributes are simply much more primitive and fundamental whereas "blue pill" attributes are more socialized.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/19 10:36 PM
1

Surely one part does not define the whole. Either way, I find it very hard to judge people and much easier to judge ideas. My judgement concerning donald trump is solely based off my intuition and a select few trends in his behavior and I would gladly entertain any further discussion or answer any questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 09:13 PM
1

Most people are relatively easy to manipulate with enough soundbites and repetition, sure. That's not the same thing as getting someone to be consciously persuaded to your cause. The difference is between someone who kind of gets economics agreeing with a leading scholar and a scholar of similar rigor and intellect becoming persuaded to his point of view. I'd argue that much of the reason for our current state is the fault of consumer capitalism tho. I don't value soundbites or repetition, tho I…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 05:45 PM
1

That's not true. Typically there is a motive for an agenda, and if that motive can be refuted through debate it is beneficial for both parties involved. Typically, in order to get people to buy into your agenda, you have to be able to debate and discuss it diligently and persuasively. Having an agenda isn't a bad thing. Ulterior motives drive societal advancement, everyone has them and demonizing it is wrong. We've simply lost the art of discussion in the digital age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 04:33 PM
1

Definitely. They took social niceties literally throughout their lives, and then they realized that 90% of verbal communication is either hyperbolic or filler bullshit way later than they should have. My crackpot theory is that most RPillars are intuitive and the real world VERY MUCH has a sensor bias. But you can apply your intuition to get better at understanding social interaction and power dynamics, which TRP kinda sorta does but in a toxic way imo. But the thing about TRP is it's sort of li…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 02:50 PM
6

Margery from Game of Thrones.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 04:37 PM
1

You're not intelligent enough for me to debate. Are you meming me?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 04:22 PM
1

I deliberately misinterpreted your comment, if you don't recognize that, I'm not sure what to say. I'm just not a fan of lazy snide remarks unless you're willing to discuss with the person you are insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 06:53 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 06:51 AM
1

I guess I shouldn't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 04:10 AM
1

I was messaging them to regain posting rights that were removed likes 6 months ago because I said something about the feminist movement losing the cultural battle compared with LGBTQ. I guess some words came out wrong a while back, and the message was essentially there to say I'm not going to shit post and I have genuine questions I'd like to ask. The response was muted for 3 days, to which I imagine is not limited to 3 days. And it wasn't on feminism, it was on askfeminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 03:56 AM
3

What are you saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 02:27 AM
2

What's a big word to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 02:17 AM
5

Part of feminist thought is basically the idea that sexism is so entrenched in society that almost everyone subconsciously plays into it. If that's the case, it's nutty to believe that you can reverse this trend without talking to people who are subconsciously sexist. If anything, being able to recognize subconscious prejudice is the literal gold mine for social egalitarians, which feminists say they are. Proving someone wrong is not the same thing as them recognizing it. It can be impossible fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 02:17 AM
3

It's a pretty simple concept, but any disagreement can be solved by google. the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. What the hell do you think determinism means? The law isn't the problem, the lack of its enforcement is. All of it has to do with subconscious assumptions an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 02:08 AM
1

Mechanic: $32,278-$42,370 Carpenter: $46,780 Plumber: $50,620 Average Income: $50,756 They have value, I'm sure of it. They're just average as far as professions go. I don't really talk about myself on Reddit, I talk about politics. But when the subject becomes me I'm not sure what you want me to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:49 AM
1

Umm I think I was directly referring to skin color and gender. IQ can be built and improved, even if there is a cap to how much. But if determinism holds true then the lottery of birth would be essentially everything. Never understood the internet's obsession with neckbeards.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:41 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:31 AM
1

And a firecracker sounds like a gunshot. Is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:26 AM
1

And I thought it was pretty obvious from the context of my posts that Grunt Work requires being in subservience to someone else. With the whole definition of grunt and all that. a low-ranking or unskilled soldier or other worker.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:21 AM
1

I think the vast majority of people are so far removed from serious academic study it seems ridiculous to think they are well read enough to have any informed opinion. For the most part, people just go along with whatever is around them. I'm not saying "we're not all like that" because I don't consider those people my "group." And not that it matters, but I'm a man. Don't know what made you assume I'm a woman. I dislike(d) Donald Trump because I perceived him as a rabble-rousing demagogue with 0…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 01:19 AM
1

That's not grunt work, that's building your future on your initiative. Grunt work = fucking around with spreadsheets when you know half the numbers are bullshit, answering phone calls from angry customers, etc. Grunt work in this scenario would be building a home for some other guy and getting paid disproportionately low to the effort you put in. People don't enjoy grunt work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 12:58 AM
1

Very few people take pride in gruntwork. If the threat of poverty and even lower status weren't always knocking on the door, no one would put up with menial labor. Not that it somehow makes them bad people or deserving of poverty. I take the view that it is our duty to give people the tools to make something for themselves, and I believe that if people had the tools and the drive to do it we would be out of garbagemen and cashiers. Which, if this whole automation thing picks up, isn't a bad thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 12:37 AM
0

How? Just because I wouldn't notice if the joe the plumber died tomorrow doesn't mean I want him to die. I just wouldn't notice, and it likely wouldn't have had a significant impact on the world. If Trump, Putin, or Jin died tomorrow there would be chaos and outrage and the future is forever changed. I'm simply stating that all men are not, in fact, equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:47 PM
1

I take it you're done with the discussion. The point is, conquest and the achievements of great men are necessary and indisposable in pushing society forward and shaping it to be what it is today. Carpenters are very much disposable, and if a thousand of them died tomorrow (assuming they aren't potential movers) you wouldn't notice them go.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:29 PM
2

Is that a concession?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:02 PM
2

Yes, because we're people and we tend to do that. Is that intellectually honest? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 11:00 PM
1

People don't fit neatly on spectrums. People are conservative/progressive/regressive on different issues. It is the positions that should be considered and ideologies that try to stitch several positions together. Not some arbitrary left-wing right-wing scale. For example: I am regressive in that we should return to an honor culture and appreciate the high arts as we did during the Medici's reign I am conservative in that I believe it is beneficial for the future of humanity to maintain the curr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:58 PM
1

Everyone can be averaged, but not everyone can be average. You wouldn't be able to speak with a mechanic if it wasn't for some dude on a horse succeeding at civilizing native populations.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:49 PM
2

If you had to be flawless to criticize than critics should cease to exist. An idea should be discussed and debated independently of the individual putting it forward. That being said, the whole point of feminism is to make people not sexist, right? If so, they have to engage in open dialogue with sexists and prove them wrong (which shouldn't be hard to do). That's how civil rights movements work.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:46 PM
1

I'm not successful yet, I'm a student. I have an end goal in mind and I might not reach it, but there is no reason to aim anywhere lower. But what I've read and experienced about leaders from as small as student council presidents to as large as senators is they are universally egotistical and are well aware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:43 PM
1

There's nothing "wrong" with them, they're just average. No one wants to be average.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:39 PM
2

The problem with special snowflake bashers is they are almost universally failures. Put-downs that specific originate from yourself, so let's dispense with the spiteful commentary. My whole post came from a place of recognizing subconscious sexist behavior and thought, isn't that what feminists want men to do? I have a romanticized vision of what masculinity should be, and I know it is wrong and should be set aside because if I had a daughter I would want her to be a noble statesman, not some ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:37 PM
1

Back when men were more proper in both dress and speech. It's not really the 1800s, it's actually rather prevalent in most of the western world's history. It was when the poster child for masculinity was a statesman or a scholar. Not lumberjacks, bikers, mechanics, etc. But we have since seen the unraveling of social grace with the rise of democratization, as oratory and rhetorical skill were reminders of old aristocratic rulers. I'd like to restore the high culture of the past while still keepi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:23 PM
1

You seem rather confident passing judgment without even knowing the circumstances of the "scuffle." I'd even have that discussion here if there were any feminists around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 10:10 PM
3

Why is it weird?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:56 PM
1

So, is that a yes to the prompt? It's not even the feminist subreddit, it's the ask feminists subreddit. That seems like a place more or less designed for conversation, no? No one is as interesting or original as they think they are, but if they thought less about themselves they would never accomplish anything. An overly inflated ego is better than an uninflated ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:51 PM
4

I think he expected them to come back and say "ooh, we understand" and smile and let him into the community xD Pretty much, ya
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:39 PM
1

Depends on the sub. I'm a big believer of the idea that you can't follow what you can't defend.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:37 PM
2

Successful people have large egos. They just do the fake humbleness bit for the crowds. I guess the leaders of the world are all betas by your logic tbh. If that's the case I don't really care to be alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:35 PM
1

I don't care about the mods, I just want to discuss the very real sociopolitical issues revolving around women. But it appears that most feminists do not want to actually discuss anything. With all their (edit:) less than admirable debating skills, I have never met a RPillar or alt-right individual who did not want to discuss. Even if they discussed loudly, they still discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 09:30 PM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:41 PM
2

Resources are increasingly a non-issue as technology advances and population growth stabilizes. Successful groups fight and subdue to ultimately unify and assimilate. This competition ensures that only the strongest groups advance and expand. Globalization has ultimately made everyone better off in terms of absolute wealth. People tend to care far more about relative wealth, however. This is why many are upset with the status-quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 07:16 PM
2

Typically, transhumanism centers around 3 "supers." 1. Super Longevity 2. Super Intelligence 3. Super Wellbeing http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/print/9543 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTMS9y8OVuY My political beliefs certainly take transhumanism into account, but they are rather distinguished from most. I roughly follow the outline of Hamiltonian Nationalism https://abiasedperspective.wordpress.com/2015/05/04/a-hamiltonian-statement-of-principles/ I reconcile my nationalism with transhumanism …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 07:10 PM
2

So you are saying that your people are your people solely due to the lottery of birth? That hardly seems justification to continue to divide yourself into pointless factions. I'm operating under the logic that people are stronger when unified than when divided, and so if I'm hungry it makes sense that I try to feed others and others try to feed me. If everyone just immediately fought for themselves we would have chaos and disorder, and a very select few people would have their needs met. But if …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 06:47 PM
1

For better or worse I'm a bit...unique. So women will often fit the general characteristics I want but they won't have many connecting interests so usually my relationships fizzle out around 4 months. But I'm pretty young so I'm not exactly focusing on romantic relationships at all rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 06:06 PM
2

They are ruthless and powerful. I don't want a servant I want an ally. If I wanted someone to do the dishes and submit to me I'd hire a maid not marry a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:49 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:43 PM
2

It makes no sense to consider your people anything less than the entirety of the human race. Especially on the shallowest traits such as skin color or gender. Cultural divides are a bit more understandable, but I believe the end goal is to develop a unified global culture. Which is the trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:24 PM
2

I never criticized the utility of the endeavor itself. I do, however, believe that vast majority of social sciences (economics, political science, etc) are far better developed and utilize much more concrete bits of evidence as opposed to Evo-psych.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:23 PM
1

I think most of human nature is "wrong" and self-destructive. We are the result of billions of years of chemical experimentation (evolution) but evolution cannot look into the future or further inquire into the reason for its existence. I think humanity should attempt to upgrade their primitive Darwinian brains into something more perfect, which is why I am a transhumanist. I believe this can be achieved through the technological singularity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:12 PM
2

It's very clear that the question posed after "I think most of Evo psych is pseudoscience" was inviting debate over using Evo psych as justification for traditional gender roles. Not the validity of Evolutionary Psychology itself. This is the definition of science Science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge. This system uses observation and experimentation to describe and explain natural phenomena. The term science also refers to the organized body of knowledge people have gained using tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:09 PM
14

It is silly, and I don't think you can find a single credible scientist who thinks that evolution has not had an affect on our minds. But you WILL find many scientists who will deny that anything useful as verifiable has come out of evolutionary psychology in practice. I have no doubt in my mind that one day something similar to evolutionary psychology will be verifiable and an accepted/legitimate field of study, but by no means are we anywhere near that stage as of now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:20 PM
3

I've read them, I understand their perspectives, but there are far too many assumptions already taken for granted as true to make it stand as an equal to hard science in any sense and there are far too many missing links and unbacked studies to make stand on an equal footing with social sciences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:17 PM
2

There's nothing wrong in principle with attempting to rationalize human behavior through an evolutionary lens, but in practice, you get tons of questionable assumptions that are not at all grounded in objective observations. This is a critique of evolutionary psychology posited by evolutionary psychologists. http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/ldc/GrayEP.pdf In short, I think there are a few hunches my intuition could find understandable but this sort of "science" is softer than social sciences…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:10 PM
1

Can't you ever get to a point though when you've cherry picked so much it becomes generic advice that was always around and not at all TRP exclusive?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:23 PM
1

So, like, working out?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:17 PM
1

TRP thinks these women are wasting their lives doing something they aren't "programmed" for and should be raising children. wut, that's pretty gross. I only find career women sexy tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:14 PM
2

How do you define feminism? At the end of the day this is all semantics with a politically charged word.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:12 PM
1

What? My point was that you should keep questions relevant to whatever is at hand. And jealousy is ridiculous, any jealousy is intolerable and for that reason I tend to prefer open relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 03:11 PM
1

I generally don't care what she's up to if it isn't directly affecting me. The only time clear and transparent communication is required is if we're in on something together or something is bothering her/me. Then of course, there are those other secrets I prefer kept that aren't when you pass relationship milestones. (shaving in front of each other and all that other gross stuff)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 02:59 PM
1

Why do you need to know what she/he does friday night when we're talking about household finances? Those are the kind of secrets I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 02:57 PM
1

You share details when relevant to the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 02:39 PM
1

Wait, let's take a step back here. Propping each other up =/= competition (though ofc you and your SO will compete, it's only human nature) What I mean by propping each other up is you are both never satisfied with your relationship/lives/bodies/minds/etc and understand that living is a constant process of improvement and advancement. That doesn't mean you don't love each other until they reach an unlikely goal, it means you love them and push each other towards that goal. Why your SO and not so…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 02:35 PM
1

If you wanted to socialize with them on the sole basis to make them feel included, it's pity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 02:26 PM
2

So I'm guessing you're the more content/satisfiable type? How do you expect to improve if you are not challenged by those closest to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 05:04 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:56 AM
1

It's clearly more than that in the series. It is calculated but by no means cold, they actually do have an intense erotic desire for each other, it just transcends physical stuff like sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:48 AM
1

As a caring person, I have always tried to include some of the more introverted or socially awkward people in my social life which has led to some guys developing romantic feelings and then blaming me for leading them on. People can't stand being pitied. If you were to openly tell me that the reason you kept me around was because you felt I was too introverted or socially awkward I would be furious tbh. Male/female/gay/straight whatever, power dynamics are everything. Feeling like you don't have…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:46 AM
1

You know, being too high value is also a thing right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:41 AM
2

I'm probably going to sound like a douchebag saying this, but do you really think someone with Aspergers is going to be able to accurately assess the social stigma as it is perceived by the people around him at any point in time?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:40 AM
1

Feeling content is a disease IMHO. Fear, insecurity, and desire are what force man to exalt his station. Though I do think gender/race/religion issues are a stupid waste of time. An ideal world would understand the shallow nature of these characteristics and throw them out entirely. I think halting the aging process and developing super intelligence are far more important than the oppression Olympics tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:35 AM
1

I've found "creep" to be synonymous with ugly socially awkward men. Attractive socially awkward men are called quirky instead. Actual "creeps" are called what they are, serial killers, rapists, et cetera.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:13 AM
1

Generic Platitudes aren't advice. When people come to anyone seriously asking for advice, they want specific information that leads to a specified result. Social Interaction isn't exact like that, but it does have some trends that can be predicted and put into place. Introverted, extroverted, dominant or submissive These can be changed enough to the point where you can activate one or the other with enough effort and willpower. To suggest they can't is dangerous because generally, society dictat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 04:06 AM
1

Why is the housewife obsolete? There's a bunch of stuff that no one wants to do around the house. Granted, it's likely in the best interest of the couple and their potential offspring if both of them work.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 05:02 AM
1

Wow. I just kind of stepped into this whole world but I don't get why this is all news. I mean, isn't it pretty obvious that women would want a man who is successful and handsome? Isn't it pretty obvious that men would want a woman who is gorgeous and high-status? Sure, there are things that matter a lot more to make the relationship healthy and enjoyable, but those are noticed AFTER your appearance and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 04:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter