TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OK0450 Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by OK0450 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No it's a 5 star system. Read.the.post. if we take it like that the it's fair to say 1 star is 0-2 2 star is 2-4 and so on meaning 3 stars are people who are 4-6. Above average maximum. They only took 3 star readings from the post I can see but it's clear what the stars mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 04:01 PM
2

Read the original post it's right there smh. Incels are wrong and this proves it, a 6/10 women has a 1.1% chance of matching + messaging first + having a conversation longer than 5 seconds, this goes directly against what incels have been saying for ages about how women are constantly getting messages from 'chads' and it's inflated there ego and that's why they won't screw them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:46 PM
2

Look at the stats dude. And no, the study is about people of all rankings. Did you not read the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:31 PM
3

Dude only 18 percent of men weren't messaged first once, when you add in that women are wayyy more likely to match and just let the guy initiate I'd say guys are getting some matches, a lot more than what the incels here say. I'm not denying it's easier for top tier guys but it's nowhere near as drastic and this proves it. Hell I see guys here say say get matches but NEVER get replies, this disproves that and that's just one claim. Another issue is people thinking being an 'average' person makes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:23 PM
2

Lmao no I'm not a woman and what world are you living in where people send less messages means they are having more sex? Do you actually buy that the top 20 percent of guys are just being sent addresses by random women waiting to screw them? Lmao, I agree that if you message too much it can give the wrong idea but that's after a certain point up until then it's just logistics and introductions. As for this not being an echochamber: there are plenty of fucked up forums where people share disgusti…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 03:05 PM
3

Even if that is the case? (It's not to anyone who isn't depressed or a nihlist but for the sake of it) you can still affect a lot change regardless of genetics, don't be so defeatist, it never got anyone anywhere. There are still more things to do in life, people live for years without having children and many have purposeful, fulfilled lives, sex, marriage and kids are just one facet of achieving fulfillment. What I've found is to find out what it is you want to achieve in your life (that is di…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 01:29 PM
3

I empathize with the point they are making but it's like they look at what an overweight man with no charisma and style gets on tinder and then just says 'SeE gUyS uNLeSs uR cHaD itS oVeR'. Like this proves it's incorrect, fucking hell 21% response rate even for a first message is about 100x higher than what these guys act tinder is like for the non Chris Hemsworths of this world. Not to mention the obsession with how women who are 6s are being messages constantly by these incredible guys. Well …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 10:38 AM
2

Yes it does, 21% of men got a reply when they sent the first message. So that means that over 1 in 5 women you message are going to respond to you. The chances of getting a 5 message long conversation is lower I'll give you that but it's still low as hell for 6/10 women also. The chances go up exponentially as looks increase but as I've said before a lot of guys can get 7/10+ with work so these no real reason to complain. People here are constantly going on about how average or even below averag…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 08:36 AM
4

The percentages went up which shows that he ended the conversation with the less attractive women or they ended it with him, which is a good thing it means 40 percent or so of the time his conversations longer than a few messages are with women MORE attractive than him. This goes against the 80/20 obsession this sub has. It means that 6/10 men are doing fine which means that literally any guy aside from the genetically deformed can have a decent time on tinder as any guy can become a 6/10 and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 07:26 AM
5

There's no sense dude, your just talking to a brick wall who will just spit back '80/20!!!!'. And as for people saying it doesn't mean people are having sex, yes of course lots of messages doesn't guarantee people are having/will end up having sex. But generally people who have exchanged 65 messages are more likely to end up having sex than people who sent 2, that's just common sense. These stats just shows stuff that the average guy knows, women have it easier on tinder but it's nowhere near as…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 07:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter