TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ObjectsTo20CharLimit Archive

View 2 posts and 36 comments by ObjectsTo20CharLimit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And that's the self-delusional ego talking. Like I say, unattractive people will put a lot of stock into coping mechanisms and psychological placebos. It's way easier than accepting that you are unattractive, and there's absolutely nothing which you can do to make yourself attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:40 PM
0

There is no such thing as an ''incel''. Prostitutes are cheap. Stop indulging creepy, slimy narcissists.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:20 PM
2

[citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:18 PM
0

Nobody who dresses normally gets followed around by security, unless they are exhibiting suspicious behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:15 PM
1

Nobody who dresses normally gets followed around by security, unless they are exhibiting suspicious behaviour. Once again, dressing badly is negative, dressing normally is neutral, and ''dressing well'' is also neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:03 PM
1

I'm guessing that most TRP adherents are absolutely infuriated by them. Pretty boys are generally DYEL levels of scrawny. They also often have a meekish, non-combative persona. Yet, they are still adored by teenage girls and young women. I think the disadvantage with pretty boys is that they don't age well, even if they keep a fullish head of hair. For example, if you ignore his fame and status, then DiCaprio is not attractive. Youthful, feminine features don't look good on the head of a grizzle…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:44 AM
-1

I disagree. I used extreme examples to illustrate just how irrelevant clothing is in a woman's attractiveness. If I'd used a more mild example, the point would be exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:24 AM
2

It's not different for guys. It's a coping mechanism which unattractive men use to avoid acceptance of the fact that they are helplessly sexually undesirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:19 AM
0

Are you serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:15 AM
1

It doesn't matter one way or the other. My point is that good clothing won't make a 3/10 anything more than a 3/10, or a 6/10 any more than a 6/10, whether they are a man or a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:13 AM
0

Only superficially. If your thing is impressing random strangers in the street, in a cold climate, then go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:09 AM
3

Absolutely. She looks rough as fuck in the first picture, but that's because it's a candid, unwilling, paparazzi shot. I can guarantee you that it has nothing to do with her clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 11:06 AM
1

Yeah, if you dress like a tramp, then that's going to work against you. It's like personal hygiene: bad breath, BO, and unwashed hair are going to create negative reactions. Whereas, neutral breath, body smell, and hair aren't going to be majorly enhanced by chewing gum, eau de toilette, conditioner, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 10:59 AM
1

How is it disingenuous? Clothing doesn't alter your physical features or personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 10:48 AM
1

LOL No-one on welfare ''struggles for food''. The amount received is more than adequate to cover food costs. Any other necessities, or unforeseen costs, are also met by welfare. I've never used a prostitute, but I've often toyed with the idea when I'm drunk, horny, and lonely. There are pretty girls with good reviews who only charge £25-£30 per quarter hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 10:41 AM
1

No, prostitutes are easily affordable many times a month, even if you're on welfare. You've just got to face the fact that ''incels'' don't exist, and the term is only used as a covery by creepy, slimy narcissists.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 09:34 AM
2

Yeah, and I know no-one fitting this description who doesn't get laid. Does my anecdote count more than yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:25 AM
4

Do we have an example of someone who is decent looking, sociable, approaches women, and socially literate, but still can't get laid? Or is this scenario just r/incels fan-fiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 08:01 AM
1

Incels don't exist. There is nowhere in the world where prostitutes aren't easily affordable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 07:40 AM
4

If they're decent looking, then I just think it's a case of the fear or rejection/social humiliation outweighing the desire to get laid. So they remain passive. Social acceptance and fear of social ostracisation is the only urge as strong - and sometimes stronger - than sexual desire in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 07:35 AM
1

I'm a man, and I find the idea of approaching a stranger in public to be completely out of order. I can't fathom how people think that it's remotely acceptable to do this. There's no excuse for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 07:16 AM
1

Most men lose all logic and values when they think they have a chance of scoring. So, most things which a man wouldn't do when he's ''sexually sober'' can generally be overcome if you give him a strong hint that he's got a chance of having sex with you. The funny thing is, that even if a woman is notorious for using her sexuality to get men to do something for her, the very next man - fully aware of her reputation - will still usually fall for it!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 07:08 AM
3

I can only speak for myself, but I dislike the argument that male and female sex drive is the same, because it's agenda-driven, unscientific, and intellectually dishonest. I look at the argument the same way as I look at arguments questioning evolution or climate change. I have to admit that I'm absolutely flabbergasted that it's even up for debate, and I'd never heard the idea seriously touted until I stumbled across these kind of forums. All the evidence strongly suggest that men have a notice…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/16 11:29 AM
2

You must be a woman. The default status of a man is horniness. A halfway attractive woman doesn't trigger any latent horniness; she's just a potential outlet for his sexual urges.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 04:05 PM
2

We're not bonobos. Women get horny, but their de facto state is generally not sexual. On the other hand, men are always sexual and horny, and that has nothing to do with socialisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 03:49 PM
1

That's an absurd argument. It takes two to tango.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 03:43 PM
3

In poor buddhist countries like Vietnam, or even in other Asian countries, they have very, very little violent crime. Dude, get out of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 02:44 PM
1

Even by your own admission, women want conditional sex. As opposed to men, who would fuck anyone 24/7 as long as she's willing, not fat, and doesn't look like a gargoyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 02:19 PM
0

No, I constantly want to have sex with multiple women because I have working testicles, and not because of socialisation. Without alcohol and drugs, even the best looking women have sex with very few men, even so they have thousands available, every hour, every day. As for good-looking male celebrities with high lay-counts? Please see just about every actor, singer, sportsman in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:43 PM
0

It's reactive to visual and mental stimulus. Women aren't wandering around in a state of perpetual horniness. If you take out the influence of alcohol and drugs, then the average woman has a very, very low count of sexual partners, which can't be explained away by societal attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:24 PM
2

Finding someone sexually attractive is not synonymous with sexual arousal. If the giggling girls were that horny, then they'd approach the boy for a 95% certain lay. Reverse the situation, and the boys would crawl over hot coals to have sex with the girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:17 PM
2

Nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 01:07 PM
2

I raised a few smirks when I was reading them, but I am generally amused by hyperbole. I don't understand the criticisism of the artistic style, because I'm sure that the guy who wrote these wasn't striving to emulate Tintin in Tibet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 12:59 PM
0

I agree with most of what you say, but I disagree with the premise that it's society dictating your sexual desires. Good-looking male celebrities have lay-counts in the hundreds and thousands, whereas even women who are branded as ''sluts'' are generally nowhere near a triple-figure lay-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 12:44 PM
8

My view is that men generally have a far higher sex drive than women, but when a woman is ''in'' to a man, then they are pretty similar. I'm not denying that women get randomly horny, but by and large, a man's sex drive is proactive, whereas a woman's is reactive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 12:06 PM
2

The problem with so-called ''incels'' is that they absolutely crave validation from other people. The opposite end of the validation stick is being ''invalidated'' by others. This is what they fear the most. They are passive, and seem like they don't try, because the fear of certain people's disapproval engenders a fear that outweighs the comfort of having a neutral position of not trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 11:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter