TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OceansAway Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by OceansAway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Definitely check out Christina Hoff Sommers' book The War Against Boys.
/r/MensRights23/04/10 04:58 AM
2

Well, I suppose that counts for something that you are at least attempting to be polite. Why on Earth (or any other planet for that matter) would you deliberately choose to misspell or punctuate a sentence? It bothers me because it makes you seem less intelligent and less educated. RELAX! DON'T DO IT Is this some odd "Frankie goes to Hollywood" reference?
/r/MensRights07/04/10 06:14 AM
2

Pretty much, at least on this topic. I agree with you, North America is neurotic... I just wish you would use proper spelling and grammar.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 05:27 AM
2

Alot of Europe "A lot" is two words.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 12:34 AM
1

I think the failure of your competing reddit First, I don't think the intention is a competition. Second, that subreddit has only been around for 24 days. It has gained 4 new readers in the last day alone. It hardly qualifies as a failure. /mensrights has been around TWO YEARS. It is not a valid comparison.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 11:58 AM
8

I was pointing that I am a man and this is a non-issue. It may be a non-issue to you, but it is to the rest of /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights17/03/10 06:47 PM
0

Prime example of the evil of feminism. Good find.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 11:30 PM
1

Anti-male sexism at a federal level.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 08:11 PM
-5

Would I hire a man as my child's nanny? Of course. Would I hire a women for anything? Hell no.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 06:23 PM
-7

Good article, if a bit depressing. Women's studies AKA feminism should never have been allowed to flourish like the cancer it is, but now that it is here it must be eliminated as quickly and aggressively as possible.
/r/MensRights31/01/10 04:06 PM
2

She should have been banned a long time ago.
/r/MensRights30/01/10 11:27 PM
7

Are gays seen as an enemy of your movement? No, why would they be? Feminist sympathizers? I should hope not. But ask the gays if they are, not us. Are they wanted as a possible ally? We need all the allies we can get.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 04:05 PM
3

"self-harm injuries" to her arms That's going to be the basis of her free pass.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 03:51 PM
1

Very interesting. What programs did you use to do the animation and the voice?
/r/MensRights28/01/10 04:44 AM
1

The only way something as blatantly unconstitutional as VAWA was passed was through lies and propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 01:40 AM
2

Take a look at the link Rygarb provided.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 12:55 AM
6

Very true.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 11:32 PM
7

One of the unspeakable secrets in the world of child sexual abuse is that mothers can be molesters. Often, they prey on daughters, but more frequently their sons -- who report increased feelings of isolation and sexual confusion along with thoughts of suicide. I'd say that's something that can only be fixed by women, not men.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 11:28 PM
8

That is the problem though, plumeria. Society, and people in general, would rather not think about it, and figure if they just ignore it, it will go away. It won't.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 09:13 PM
4

So true. That pretty much sums up the thought process behind it (or lack thereof).
/r/MensRights27/01/10 08:55 PM
1

That's a rather odd analogy, because while bigfoot is not real, crazy incredibly hateful feminists are very much real, just look at the one this thread is about. I'm not sure I can sum up the essence of the problem any better than the quote I used in my previous post, but I'll try. 1.) Many feminist leaders write and preach a similarly hateful ideology. 2.) We do not ever hear other feminist leaders denouncing such hateful messages. 3.) With no differing opinions, in the minds of those demonized…
/r/MensRights26/01/10 03:53 AM
1

No, they may not represent you, but... If I could quote XFDRaven: The trap here is a kind of guilt-by-association. Feminism has many of its leaders writing such hateful books and preaching similarly hateful philosophy. We (all of us) don't have much (if any) visibility of Feminist leaders denouncing this hateful message. Without any members of the group showing differing opinions, it becomes safer to consider anyone who brands themselves a feminist to be the equivalent of a misandrist. I have re…
/r/MensRights26/01/10 01:35 AM
1

Thanks, I suppose... I didn't realize reddit comments always needed to be on topic. Well, that's generally how a thread is followed, from one post to the next. . ...but, if you are asking if I think that this feminist in question speaks for you, plumeria, I would say I have no idea. I don't even know where in the world you are accessing reddit from. I will say most western women are feminists, and therefore full of all kinds of crazy thoughts (among them, some want a man-free world). Whether you…
/r/MensRights26/01/10 01:21 AM
1

Wait... how is this on topic? We were discussing the deafening silence of the feminist leaders in regards to hateful messages such as this one, and how much notice would take place if one ever did speak out against it.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 01:05 AM
7

If by interesting you meant supremely retarded, then yes.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 02:42 PM
1

a vehemently anti-man person is going to stand out a hell of a lot more than someone who doesn't give a damn about gender Believe me, if a feminist leader was visibly denouncing these hateful messages it would attract a HUGE notice, not only among feminists, but those who care about the rights of men as well. But that's just not happening.
/r/MensRights22/01/10 11:34 PM
26

What's next, banning sex toys?
/r/MensRights22/11/09 11:23 PM
1

I think you would receive more comments if your username was "DivorcingDad".
/r/MensRights22/11/09 11:19 PM
4

It's sad that we are only now getting back to innocent until proven guilty. Maybe this time it will stick.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 11:05 PM
1

Thank you! Sorry for the delay in responding, I missed this post. I completely agree with you. I didn't realize The New Man was invite-only. I was wondering about being a "contributor", but it all makes sense now. "“No men who really think deeply about women retain a high opinion of them; men either despise women or they have never thought seriously about them.” ~ Otto Weininger
/r/MensRights15/11/09 02:46 AM
-1

One day we should join together all WomenAreCunts subreddits and get some real traffic I couldn't possibly agree more...!
/r/MensRights10/11/09 08:06 AM
-2

Liverotto, you are needed in BashLadies.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 12:30 AM
-1

Great website, thank you for posting! Quite a remarkable woman.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 11:34 PM
-1

How fucked up do you have to be to advocate wiping out 45% of the world's population. That's far more than what Hitler was trying to do. Feminism is truly evil, worse even than Nazism or even religion.
/r/MensRights04/11/09 11:12 PM
-2

I like the article, but that font/colour combination is rather hard on the eyes.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 08:59 PM
6

All we have is Aerik claiming to be a man. I don't believe her. I have never met a MAN that hated men as much as she does. I have encountered plenty of women with that level of bile, however.
/r/MensRights25/10/09 10:24 PM
0

Aerik is a man. You know this how?
/r/MensRights25/10/09 09:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter