TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

OctoBerry Archive

View 2 posts and 254 comments by OctoBerry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

QuestionOctoBerry/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:24 PM
1

OctoBerry/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

Nursing is one of the few areas where we do need diversity quotas to funnel men into them. Many wards (especially mental health wards) have a male quota of staff at all times and if they can't fulfill it they have to borrow men from other areas of the hospital. The standard response in mental health wards is a 4 person team, 3 of which must be men. 1 on each arm and 1 on the legs while the 4th person gives them an injection in the arse. This makes sure the patient and all staff members are kept …
/r/MensRights14/03/15 07:00 PM
0

Labeling someone religious to discredit their opinion is as bad as labeling someone a pedophile. Being a pedophile is not illegal, it is perfectly legal to be a pedophile in Western countries, it is illegal to be a child molester. They are different things entirely and the fact that you don't understand that doesn't make my comparison any less accurate. He is claiming my thought patterns rely on some outside source which warps my views, so I'm claiming the same of him.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:27 PM
1

Modern society is fucked, we're on the ass end of an empire and on the birth of the Chinese empire.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:40 PM
-1

If you refuse to have sex with your partner you're abusing them, if you give in and have sex with them when you don't consent to it you're being raped. So you have 2 choices here, you either get raped or you get done for domestic abuse. There is no middle ground with the logic being used. Nice strawman calling me religious, I'm going to call you a pedophile, got no evidence for it but if we're throwing round names without evidence I'm going with that one. I guess your desire to touch children ha…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:36 PM
7

You do know that the MRHM will never get any where if all it does is defend right? It has to attack or it will lose any fight it gets into. This is a great way to attack.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:32 PM
-1

What do you call non-consensual sex then? Seriously, what is the word for sex you don't consent to being forced on you?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:18 PM
12

I know dude. Also he's trying to dress like some sort of gangster but instead just looks like a fedora wearing neck tattoo.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:04 PM
4

"You might want to consider making sure we like you or something bad might happen to your shop and you wouldn't want that to happen would you?" Yea, no. Fuck off. I'll label myself an anti-feminist and I'll spread the word as far and wide as I can. When you surrender before the battle even begins you lose by default.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:02 PM
3

Miss angerist is a well known feminist blogger, you're quite a bit late on that front.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:56 PM
14

There are now groups out there who are starting to troll the radical left. They're doing stuff like this where they approach them and ask them questions and film their answers, which they later show to their bosses. The people doing this are nationalists and are sick of being shit on because of it, so want to expose how batshit insane some of these people holding positions of power are. But I think this would be a good angle for men's rights to follow. Get a go pro and just go talk to these peop…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:55 PM
14

Because they're feminists looking for something to complain about. When you're looking for a problem you will find one, no matter how petty or small.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:47 PM
3

The guy made a film about hanging around on a desert island by himself for a while, I think he can handle it. We just need to bring in some of his other acting talents. What if we make Apollo 14 a combination of Big and Apollo 13? Child in a man's body gets shot into space and has to figure out how to get shit working while playing a foot piano.. in space. Or we could have him combine "A league of their own" and Apollo 13 where Tom Hanks plays a baseball coach sent into space. The rest of the te…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:46 PM
5

And ran along side a campaign to stop women being harassed by people taking pictures of them eating on public transport and having pictures taken of them and posted on Tumblr.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:38 PM
11

Run your mouth in the Middle East and you get shot or beaten, run your mouth on the Internet and you get some Patreon bucks and some e-fame. I think I know why these feminists aren't interested in trying to change the Middle east. Oh and a lot of those problems are caused by Islam, but because now Feminism is inclusive and about helping minorities, they consider Muslims to be on their side not against them. So those women forced to wear Burkas and lacking any rights isn't a problem to them becau…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:36 PM
4

Have you looked into statistics of this or is it just an urban legend of how bad it is like the rape culture on campus?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:32 PM
1

Where do you think the feminist cult members are coming from? The Millennials are the ones making up most of their number. So no, the millennials won't turn back the tide, we'll be fighting against them for another 10 years or so before the real world catch up to them and they either grow up and see that everything they've been taught if bullshit (not likely) or they double down and blame everything on patriarchy theory/capitalism because that's the only answer they were ever given (more likely)
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:27 PM
0

Someone claiming that not allowing someone to have sex with you is abusive is exactly what I said. If you notice, that is what they said and I pushed it to it's logical conclusion.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:24 PM
0

"If you don't let people rape you then you're punishing them" You're fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:37 PM
1

You're living in a fantasy world. We already have problems matching kids to people wanting to adopt them, not everyone has relatives and someone still has to pay for those kids to be taken care of in the mean time and the child's parent may not have any income to pay for it.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:17 PM
4

Can you prove someone didn't use a condom and it isn't just the mother claiming he didn't when there was an accident?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:08 PM
2

So whats your solution to not having the taxpayer paying for a child who is taken into care because of child neglect? I want to know your magical solution that exists between "Government" or "Parent".
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:06 PM
2

The problem also arises that unless you do this with legal backing (i.e. get a lawyer to write up the letter and signed for delivery) you have no way to prove a guy was or wasn't informed of it.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:48 PM
4

Condom breaks, women gets pregnant. Who's responsible? Can I sue the condom makers?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:44 PM
-2

One problem with this is that you punish a child for it's parents decisions. If the parent is poor then the child is going to suffer for it and may end up being ill because of it. A better solution is instead of government hand outs in the form of cash, it's provided in the form of care for the child. Free lunches at school, free clothing and uniforms where needed. Basically the school becomes the point of distribution and when it's clear a child needs help, the child gets given that help in the…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:43 PM
2

Boys and girls have the same sexual education classes as I'm aware. They're usually given when you're 14 and teach you the basics of how things work.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:38 PM
-1

Set up a clause that says if you're in YOUR BIOLOGICAL (important) child's life then you're responsible for that child. Set a time frame (my nephew is almost 3 and knows who his parents are, so 3 years old seems a good age to me) and once you hit that time frame the contract becomes void due to your own actions.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:36 PM
7

The contract is between the two parents. If we use your logic then abortion isn't allowed because the baby isn't allowed to have a say in their own abortion and as such the woman's right to an abortion is void.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:33 PM
8

Denying a woman sex is also domestic abuse according to some domestic abuse studies. So enjoy being abusive to women ;)
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:58 PM
11

You will never stop white knighting, you will always have men who want to defend women just for being women. You have men who commit murder for women, how do you stop those sort of people from white knighting?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:55 PM
2

Feminism is losing traction, they're doing so much stupid stuff that people are turning against them. Not all of them will become MRAs, but they will sap power from the feminists which will make more room for the MRA to exist and become a full blown civil rights movement.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:06 PM
2

/r/mensrights isn't just a Men's rights sub, it's also a sub to discuss men's issues in a safe space where they won't be told they're mansplaining or to STFU and let the women speak. One of the big issues for the MHRM is that men have no space to discuss their issues and express themselves among their peers. We need to allow people to express themselves and discuss their thoughts as well as wider issues. Debating differences is one of the best ways to become informed on issues and having a solid…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:01 PM
3

You could also mention that some men are very protective of their partners and feel uncomfortable knowing they shared them with other men. Some men hold traditional values and want to be their wife's knight in shining armour, they want to hold her, consider her really special and to be her all and everything. He doesn't want to feel like he's just another mercenary doing her bidding until the next on comes along and everything he holds dear now is just the same circus she puts on for all of them…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:57 PM
3

I hold both to the same standard but I can explain the logic to you. Women own sex, they have almost full control over when men get to have sex and when they don't. Women are almost always chased and pick who they mate with, where as men almost always chase and have to be picked to get laid. So when a man gets laid, he achieved something, he impressed a woman enough to sleep with her, when a woman gets laid she decided there was a man that met her standards and had sex with him. Is it more impre…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:53 PM
5

More first world problems.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:46 PM
1

Men's rights is a political sub, how many people do you think are interested in politics let alone a movement that is demonised in the media? How many people do you know who like seeing fucked up stuff on the Internet? You're comparing apples to oranges and wondering why they don't taste the same.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:42 PM
40

The father should be free of any payments what so ever and not be listed any where as the child's father. Have him considered to be a sperm donor with no connection tot he child in any fashion.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:37 PM
8

2 of the responses are reasonable. They say "don't fuck with them, maybe they're actually legit, just get on with your own business" and the other 2 are "HISS HISS! THE MRA! THE MRA! THEY'RE NEO NAZIS! HISS! DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN DO STOP THEM BUT DON'T GET ARRESTED HISS!" Hardly worth a post here. Who gives a shit? If they attack a MRA group film it and put it on Youtube, if they don't then the MRA group gets a foot hold and that's a good thing. It's a win/win situation for men's rights either w…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:00 AM
4

Doesn't he also sponsor some groups (like Victor Zen's stuff) an d pay some of the staff?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:06 AM
5

Why not ask the kid if he wants someone to cut some of his penis off. I think at 4 he is aware enough to have a say in this, it's not vital to his survival so lets ask him and see what he says.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:59 AM
1

They're straight up anti-intellectual. I don't know how you get to the point where you look at biology and scream biotruth about it.. it's just.. Jesus fuck.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:54 PM
4

Maybe the song lyrics are completely different? Take that had a song about missing their ex, regretting the mistakes they made and wanting her back. This is a break up song that is positive. If you sing a song going "lol fuck you, you were a slut, glad you're gone :D" then that is not a break up song, it's being an asshole.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:23 PM
-12

It's pretty telling that a woman made a sensible decision about sex differences in sport? You look like a complete asshole here because you're upset that people don't want to compete with people who will seriously hurt them and they stand no chance of beating.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:15 PM
-7

Stop tarring all women with the same brush. This woman is saying she doesn't want to get the shit beaten out of her by a man because she knows she doesn't stand a chance. That is a fair statement and we know nothing of her political ideals or her stance on anything but "I don't want to get my face kicked in"
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:05 PM
5

Because the CEO of Reddit is a SJW. I'm not even kidding. She had some of the smartest men in the world try to coach her (paid for by her company after she landed a position at a top firm, completely flopped and proceeded to claim discrimination after they told her to GTFO. So now she is suing them because she believes they owe her money for lost earnings, even though they gave her an amazing severance package that gave her 2 years of salary and then a lump sum at the end of it if she hadn't fou…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:03 PM
12

Vaginas are self cleaning and yet there is evidence in nature that some species keep data from previous mates and it maybe true in humans but hasn't been fully looked into yet.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:59 PM
9

I googled it and found a bucket load of results. If you think you're able to comment on a topic but can't even google something then I don't know how to help you there. You shouldn't engage with conversations you're not educated about.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:57 PM
1

What came first, the chicken or the egg? ;) Does the fall kill the guy who jumped or does him jumping kill him?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:09 PM
1

I think you need to use both methods and I'm just as fallible to one as I am to the other. Who hasn't had an ex who was awesome to you or so you thought at the time then later you realised they were really quite shitty?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:01 PM
0

How much do you value potential futures? One could argue that by her actions she cost him a potentially amazing relationship. She could of been the perfect woman for him if she just didn't use dicks like space hoppers. While no one is entitled to sex or to date someone, you could make an argument that her actions lead directly to him suffering. The drink analog is showing that even though throwing a drink isn't the first blow of a fight, actions leading up to that fight lead to the first blow. H…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:51 PM
0

As a single one off event? Not someone I would be interested in but not a terrible person overall no. But that is incredibly unlikely to happen, people's morals don't change by magic.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:46 PM
7

NONE of this situation is about HER or her past, this whole post is about HIM and how he reacts to the unchangeable past. I got to this point and just gave up. You're completely erasing consequences for her actions and how the entire situation is manufactured by her actions. If you throw a drink in my face and I punch you for it, you started the fight not me even though I threw the first punch.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:29 PM
1

My point was that if you erase history from making judgements then we're unable to make an informed judgement. If I think it's horrible to have a 100 people gang bang where 99 women fuck 1 guy, then no matter if it's illegal or not that is horrible to me and I'm going to consider them all horrible people.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:27 PM
5

Pregnancy is only 1 of the problems with sexual activity. The pill made it easier than ever to get STDs, which is another solid reason for discouraging people from having casual sex.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:23 PM
2

Can you link to the STD news article or study please? I imagine it has to do with birth control personally. Women can use the pill but guys have to use a condom to be safe, so women are able to have more "unprotected from STDs" sex than guys are without risking pregnancy.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:19 PM
4

Gynocentric society means we're over protective of girls and not very protective of boys but I think most parents fear pregnancy at a young age no matter which sex is involved.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:18 PM
5

You don't take into account how dangerous it is to have one night stands with people you've never met before and never will again. You have to go to a private location with someone you hardly know and mostly just find attractive. This can end very poorly.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:17 PM
1

Biological logic. Children born out of a stable relationship tend to have more problems (both resources and behaviour problems) than those born within stable relationships. Casual sex risks a single parent situation which has a lower chance of our DNA being passed on, so we don't like it on an evolutionary level. On a conscious level? Do you really want to think of your daughter fucking countless guys and taking all these risks or would you rather she had a steady and mutually supportive relatio…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:15 PM
3

If hookups get harder then they didn't solve their personality flaw, they just have less chances to take advantage of it. So even if the well has almost dried up, you still can't trust them not to take a drink from someone else's cup when it's offered.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:12 PM
-5

Using your logic here. Child rapists aren't horrible people because they're not actively raping a child right now. People aren't responsible for their actions the moment the action has ended so we shouldn't consider them bad people when they did bad things.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:10 PM
4

Lie! Don't ever tell the truth! Telling the truth is wrong. Today on /r/mensrights where telling someone something they don't want to hear because it might upset them is considered the right move.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:08 PM
27

No, people get accused of misogyny because it's an insult that wins arguments to people who care what others think of them. Stop being anti-intellectual, if the scientific data backs up this person's post (I've seen data that does) then he isn't being hateful towards women, he is being accurate. It's not misogyny to point out that men's world records in sports are higher than women's world records. It's just the facts. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:07 PM
10

Not your problem if someone gets angry at the truth. Unless it's going to cause you serious harm (i.e. get you murdered) you should not sugar coat the truth from any one.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:05 PM
40

A truly idiotic man thinks that the past does not define a person. Do you think we get from birth to now by magic? Decisions people have made in the past are a very important piece of evidence for how we judge the future. If we go along with your "it's all in the past, let by gones be by gones" logic, then I'm going to go open the door to every prison cell on Earth and let all the criminals out. YOU decided to sleep around, YOU decided how much casual sex YOU had. Now I'M deciding that I want no…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:04 PM
2

We should start using the term "HPV shaming" or "cancer shaming". Shaming a man for wanting to avoid people who have a higher chance of giving them a strain of HPV that will give them cancer is a pretty shitty thing to do.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:00 PM
-2

When multiple people in the comments post tl;drs it's usually accurate and what I was posting.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:01 PM
-4

I'm not buying into the pedo hysteria, I consider pedophilies and child molesters to be two different categories of people entirely. I just read the comments as you didn't explain any of the situation and outside of the title which made it sound like 100% false accusations.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:19 PM
1

San Francisco on disability Do you have a source on this? I would be very interested in seeing these figures and how they relate to actual disabled people in the area. Is it possible that some of these trust fund kids aren't actually trust fund kids but are using Daddy Government instead?
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:18 PM
5

San Fransisco is becoming a shit hole because they're so liberal they can't even vote for reasonable spending. They're parasites who vote on their ideologies not on reality and when things start to go south they go "oh it's too shitty here, look how bad it is" and move onto the next city to destroy. We're just starting to see it now with SF since it's been taken over and completely run into the ground compared to the original character.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:29 AM
-16

tl;dr an 18 year old fucked a 15 year old and got done for being a pedophile.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:20 AM
67

Get all the parents of the boys involved together and talk to them about it. They care about their kids future, they're going to care if you're getting a second class education and will start to make a lot of noise about it.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:15 AM
0

You mean how apple products now all run on intel hardware? Hardware I can purchase to build my own computer with? ;)
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:49 PM
-2

Apple products.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:45 PM
0

Please do not give this complete cunt any attention. Now not and not ever. The guy is a complete bell end who got where he is by whoring his sister out on a gaming site and using crude humour. When Gamergate broke open he tweeted that gamers supported child pornography and then wondered why people were upset with him.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:41 PM
6

That racial make up isn't identical like these people want to claim and we should take this into account as well as the systems we funnel people into and expect identical results? Bam, just got some rad feminist calling me racist and answered your question in one. Lets go for the bonus round and point out that there are differences in male and female intelligence and since maths attracts high intelligence individuals, we're more likely to see men in them than women in the mostly-white western wo…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:34 PM
2

Nor does it justify never giving women the option to pay the bills and be autonomous. Rather than reply to your entire post, I'm going to recommend you watch more of GWW's stuff. She covers how the myth that women could not own property or pay their own bills is just that, women through history were able to do that exact thing if they wanted to. I think you've either seen very little of her or you've not watched the right videos and you're applying feminist history to her videos. I would argue t…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:01 PM
1

"They make it so you're not allowed to speak the truth because feminists run from it when present" is another way to phrase your post. Which is why shockingly, the sub is failing miserably and people are starting to consider it yet another feminist sub.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:16 PM
1

I'm not sure about the sub but don't label all MGTOWs as woman haters, there are legit reasons to distance yourself from women in the current system. One could argue that being around a woman is dangerous if she only has to tell one lie about you to turn your life to shit. What is your problem with GWW's post? she simply says "If I'm paying the bill then I'm in charge" and that if women want to be equal to men and be in charge then they have to pay their share of the bill. Historically men have …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:13 PM
1

There are going to be MRAs who don't care about women, that's impossible to prevent. But most MRAs I have seen are fighting on the MRA side because they want equality. They have seen the facts and scientific studies and seen how bad men have it and want to even that up. I am not an MRA, I am an anit-feminist. I believe in equality of opportunity for everyone and for everyone to get a fair shake of the stick. This currently means that I am supporting the MHRM to make things better for men and boy…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:36 PM
2

Femra debates is dead from what I've seen. A lot of MRAs have walked away from it when you warnings for saying "That's bullshit" and provide evidence for it. It wants a safe-space mentality and that means you can't call someone out on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:21 PM
2

You do understand feminists wrote the history books and massively over stated their own relevance correct? A lot of GWW's work is showing how historically feminism did very little but push misandry and classism and that the women's civil right's movement was progressing at a fair rate without them. You need to separate what feminism claims history to be and what actual history was. If we use your logic then the Men's right's movement is entire MGTOW, every single person involved was a MGTOW and …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:16 PM
3

And then a recording of it was put on Youtube to shame him for showing some kindness to another person in a soulless city where people would step over you if you were bleeding to death in the side walk.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:40 PM
4

Ghostbusters covered this, it's actually a joke if a ghost sexually assaults a man while he's unconscious and unable to consent.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:38 PM
4

This doesn't actually bother me, I would love to see more of this. It's like when you say "my uncles a racist" and he denies it then points at the TV and goes "hahaha look at those dumb niggers playing Football. Who knew a chimp could be trained to do that?" The more rad fems expose themselves, the more the MHRM will be believed and grow in strength. I 100% support them becoming graffiti artists and decorating every space they can find, it can only work in our favour.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:37 PM
1

Women usually control most things, but it's men who act as the enforcement. And 1 woman ruling doesn't make any difference to someone being abused, male or female the person in charge isn't helping. If you want to murder me do you think someone telling you not to is going to stop you? Shelters are for OH FUCK moments, not for "we had an argument" moments.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:13 AM
2

Are you on some sort of drugs that stop you understanding logic..? An abusive partner running a shelter would be probably a billion to one odds. That is not something you can base policy on, it may happen but it is very unlikely. Gay people can use the same shelters as straight people, domestically abused gay people make up at very most 2% of the population, this is taking the most extreme estimates on how many people are gay (did not for sex) and the percentage of domestic abuse (using lesbian …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:39 AM
4

You're talking complete bollocks. The reason why shelters are split by sex is so that the abusive partner can't rough themselves up, call the same shelter and get access to their victim and continue to abuse them in the shelter. Yes gay relationships make this not perfect, but since the population of gay people is between 1 and 10%, that means even at the most extreme estimates that it's a flaw for 2% of the population. Exposure therapy relies on having a safe space to retreat to, a space where …
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:00 AM
8

Segregation doesn't make a place safe? Okay, what about a group set up for men who have been so harshly abused by women that they're terrified of one even being in the room? Having it welcome women would completely destroy the group's purpose.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:27 AM
5

No, male only spaces are not allowed by law, you will get done for sexism if you even think of trying it. Women must always be allowed access to everything, even testicle cancer support groups or you're discriminating and the government will be wanting a word with you.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 12:06 AM
4

I think you would heavily benefit from reading [this post](https:/np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1jt1u5/cmv_i_think_that_mens_rights_issues_are_the/cbi2m7a) from /r/changemyview. A gentleman (I assume) breaks down why the MRA exists, why feminism isn't the answer for men and the resulting backlash from feminism towards the MRHM. It's framed in a feminist view, but it's a post about changing a feminists view that "The MRA is fighting the Patriarchy and should just join feminism" but I thin…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:56 PM
6

I never said taking control, a 50/50 balance would be fine. Gender studies are a feminist mouth piece at this point, I think almost all MRAs support their removal from academia. They're basically radical feminist indoctrination classes. Christian Hoff Sommers is a professor who teached Philosphy for many years, she was asked to do a women's studies class at her university and as she was a feminist (equity feminist) she accepted. When she got the books she was horrified to find that they were com…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:52 PM
13

The wage gap has been debunked countless times, basically women like taking lower paying jobs, don't work as many hours (on average 7) and don't want on as much responsibility as men. If you compare like for like in hours worked, job experience and position then you find that women earn more than a man does for doing the exact work.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:49 PM
20

It's low because feminists are incredibly loud and have the ear of the media working for them. Which is one of the reasons MRAs have such a bad name and you're here asking if MRAs hate women. Many of us here are not MRAs, some of us couldn't care about men and boys as a group. But we care about equality and hate the feminist bullshit being used to excuse abusing people. The MHRM has many anti-feminists like myself supporting them because feminism is so incredibly destructive and the rise of a me…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:45 PM
2

Shelters are for people in serious danger not just needing a place to stay for the night while things calm down. We're talking if found they will be raped, tortured and/or killed levels of abuse, where family members won't be able to protect them and the police will turn up 20 minutes after the fact to find a body or a description of the car they got taken away to an unknown location in. You're likely not going to know if someone fled their abusive partner who tried to hunt them down and kill th…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:46 PM
0

Occupy Wall street's problem was it got over taken by the feminists. The official Twitter account came out in support of #Gamergate because they had their shit ruined by the progressive stack and all that other feminist bullshit. Look up why Occupy failed, it got taken over by progressives who constantly watered down the message and started to alienate people and stopped being constructive so everything turned into a party and discussing how oppressed people were. Street protests raise awareness…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:45 PM
1

Men don't like going to the doctors as often as women do, it's part of their nature.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:41 PM
1

Did you read my post? It had nothing to do with subreddit politics, it had everything to do with his response to someone trying to discuss things with him and how he slid the conversation. I'm well area that Reddit doesn't like conservatives and conservative values. This subreddit will downvote any one who proposes traditional values just as much as the rest of Reddit does.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:40 PM
1

I wouldn't disagree with what you said, although I wouldn't support being dishonest with people to better support them. I think honestly is paramount and the only way someone can make an informed decision is by being informed, even if that is uncomfortable for them.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:53 AM
0

Glasgow is a complete shit hole, it's the type of place where you watch your back every where you go because it has such a bad drug and alcohol abuse problem. Just going to the city makes you feel like you're in some sleazy Noir film and you're just waiting for the mobsters to appear. I'm not sure how much of a middle class they're even able to have. There is a damn good reason why the stereotype of Glasgow is this
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:59 AM
5

Most people don't consider her a feminist, she has said herself she is an egalitarian. The feminist stuff she took part in when she was younger is part of her identity and she doesn't want to give that up to the insane radicals, but the label doesn't fit her any more.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:56 AM
-7

I imagine that would only turn out well for the injustice against men in the legal system. I would love to have a feminist lawyer opposed to me if I was in the court room, while she bullshits on Patriarchy and rape culture, I simply state the facts. Do you think the judge is going to believe a nutjob claiming women are being chained to the stove in 2015 or the guy who stayed calm when he was called a rape apologist for asking a woman a question? It would end up like Jack Thompson where they are …
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:38 AM
1

I believe the figures say that 20% (roughly and varying by gay/straight match ups) of relationships are abusive. So even if the numbers aren't huge, that is a huge enough figure to make them necessary.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:33 AM
3

Feminists don't like anything. If you gave them a free $50 note they would complain it didn't have a woman's face on it. At this point just assume they're going to screech like harpies at everything and get on with what you need to do. The best way to beat them is to go over the top of them, and you don't do that by watching them like a bad YouTube reactions video.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:31 AM
3

You also have to remember even if they do go to these people for help where are the male services to forward them? Domestic violence charities are basically gate ways to other resources. They forward you to a counselor, find you a safe house to go to or a support group who offer emotional support. None of these services really exist for men, so even if you get through the gate, there is nothing beyond it for men to find.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:26 AM
1

That sounds like a mixed bag to me, they should have equal resources posters put up. Both male and female support groups should be on display, so personally I would raise the issue and ask that both are represented fairly. I don't understand these well people cards. As someone with a life long condition I never get shit from my doctors other than them telling me I need to do an asthma check up, when my asthma is so mild I haven't used an inhaler in 3 years. I always thought we could do with a sy…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:21 AM
9

Pulling off publicity stunts is the best activism you can do in the modern era, but it often requires you spend some time in police custody. Silly over the top public displays and public marches are the next real step for the MRA groups. It's just a matter of forming groups to organize these things on a local level. That's why we need more people like Victor Zen setting up men's rights groups, where MRAs can meet up and organise these sorts of things.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:05 AM
2

Either you're a troll or a bigot. A bigot is someone who can't tolerate other people's ideas, which is what you're doing here. :)
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:40 AM
-1

Do you know anything about fascism or do you just think it's a dirty word and assume I'm shit talking with it? Look into how the Nazi's started to control the population, it mirrors modern feminism to the letter. A small group of very loud people who shamed the rest of the population into submission, making exclusive groups that felt they were superior to everyone else and tried to recruit them into it by convincing them they're the superior moral majority.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:01 AM
1

I think you misunderstood me. I'm not saying these people are faking it, they have a real and very serious problem. I think political correctness is labeling a mental illness as a life style choice and making a civil rights movement around it. I'm very opposed to that and I think any one who can understand my point of view would understand why I'm opposed to it. I'm not saying they're fakers, I'm saying they're seriously ill and deserve to be supported and helped, but I don't think what we're do…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:06 AM
3

You're bullshitting here Yid. "I think you might have some conformation bias going on" "I'M BEING HARASSED! DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT!?" Back away from the feminist response dude, the fact that your opinion is unpopular on Reddit and people openly talk shit about you has nothing to do with your personal bias. You're sliding the conversation off to a topic that makes you look like some sort of victim instead of addressing the question posted at you.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:49 PM
-5

D&D has had gods who gender bend and stuff and that's fine, but I am anti-progressive and I'm against enabling mentally ill people's illnesses. So I don't want companies making trans characters and acting like it's a legit life style choice and not a mental health problem. To me enabling someone with a transgender issue is exactly the same as enabling someone with anorexia, it's incredibly harmful to them and and I don't care how much it hurts their feelings, I refuse to be anti-intellectual bec…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 11:21 PM
-2

There is a sentence about it in the character creation, which apparently is very progressive in the way it talks. Yes you can take it off now.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:26 PM
2

Is that possible for rape cases though? Rape is such a muddy area and very rarely is it a clean cut "he beat me up and jammed it up my arsehole" style case that proving malice intent would be extremely hard outside of a full on confession.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:15 PM
0

You can find a branch of feminism that will say anything you're wanting to find. Feminism is very much behind the trans rights push because it relies very healthy on the concept that your gender not being connected to your sex, which is being pushed by gender studies cult leaders. Can you picture any sort of world where being born with a penis makes you a woman except in a world that relies on post modernism to make up untestable bullshit around concepts no one can ever prove in a real scientifi…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:36 PM
-2

Progressives is the term they use, the same way the tea party used the tea party even though those fuckers were a bunch of Americans who couldn't make tea better than I could piss into a cup. The label they use it the label they use.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:13 PM
0

They HAVE started injecting feminist-world-view rules into their game. Remember the cursed belt of sex changing? It ain't cursed any more. They even made being transgender or gender fluid a choice in the actual rules. If you want to see how it's gone full WotC, there is also a transgender hero in the new Magic set. They've gone full feminist over there.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:11 PM
16

So hey, lets stop quoting shit you read on Facebook as if it's factual and totally undeniable evidence of anything. Everyone is an asshole, same way everyone is a little bit racist. We all have our opinions, our flaws and our prejudices and there isn't a single person on this Earth who doesn't think or feel something that makes them an asshole. It doesn't have to be a big thing, a small thing will do just as well, but everyone has something.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:09 PM
7

Welcome to the progressives my friend, if you're not a progressive you're a right wing fascist Nazi. Just ignore the fact that the progressive people act like actual fascists and use the same social engineering techniques that the Nazis used on their rise to power and then kept around as a means of controlling the population.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:05 PM
1

No one wants feminists on the bloody planet, if we could I'd send them all to Mars to colonize it and laugh at they all suffocate when they decide a closed dome is like a glass ceiling, representing patriarchy and open it up.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:03 PM
-1

They're fighting for the right to live the American dream. You know that ideal which can never be achieved because it's impossible to have everything.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:24 PM
17

Let them, most gamers I know are quite happy to be labeled terrorist anti social shitlords. This geek fad has gone on way too damn long and we just want our dark basements back and to be left alone to enjoy our games. Most gamers I know aren't interested in politics or reality beyond a means to continue to game. They're used to being the targets of abuse and don't care any more, you can't shame an outcast who doesn't care if he's an outcast.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:23 PM
1

Labels aren't bad, people who use labels poorly are bad. If I say "I'm a gamer" you know I love games, it's a label that says "hey man, come talk to me about vidya games" and that's a great label if you're looking to meet other people who like games. The problem is when you see the label "Gamer" and jump to neckbeard territory without ever giving me the chance to show you my personality. Using labels as a starting point is good, using labels as the ending point is bad.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:21 PM
1

You know all the first 3 things you listed women have had since 1900 at least. Women could own property, women did vote before the women's civil rights movement (check the registries) a vote was more of a family/class vote than an individual vote. And free speech is a foundation of any modern society and is one of the core rights in the USA where most of this shit is.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:20 PM
25

It's almost as if she doesn't understand the GM has to imagine the world and the people in it. So if a character is dressed in dirty armour they're going to get strange looks from the towns folk and be considered dangerous as opposed to wearing normal working clothes and just ignored as they go about their business. But hey feminists and understanding basic human interaction is always a problem. They think saying good morning to them is harassment, so clearly asking how your D&D character is rep…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:17 PM
21

And probably her last. D&D groups won't tolerate this shit, she will become a legendary green text story on /tg/ and never invited to another game. It doesn't matter if WotC print transgender gods bullshit and remove the curse from the gender bending belt, gaming groups still rule their small domains and acting like a retard will bar you from the group.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:14 PM
3

So a random "youth" hitting a guy for having a conversation with his mom. It's not even disrespectful, it's just a normal argument family members have which don't really go any where but need to be had occasionally. This guy is clearly dangerous and I imagine he's assaulted a lot more people. It's clearly not about what is actually going on but that this guy has issues and was looking to take them out on someone, this was just the ideal situation.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:51 PM
1

You're trying to kafkatrap me and say I have a problem with women. I see through your bullshit and you can claim whatever you like, I've made my statement and see your post history just shows you're a troll who claims MRAs hate women over and over. :)
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:16 PM
0

Women don't bother me, attention seekers do. I don't like male attention seekers and I don't like female attention seekers, going into a male dominated space and going "I'M A WOMAN!" is attention seeking. Same way if a man went into a female space and went "I'M A MAN!" it's attention seeking.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:48 PM
4

They gave Laci Green a TV show, what were you expecting from them? Mtv hasn't been relevant since the late 90s, iTunes replaced them in the late 00s and now they're just bad reality TV and Youtube without any of the perks of youtube.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:22 PM
0

Fuck me I give up. Enjoy your white knighting and pussy passes. I'm sure we'll get equal treatment when every woman can walk into a room and her vagina entitles her to attention and support by default.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:20 PM
0

Coming to a men's rights forum and shouting "I'm a girl, I support men's rights" is attention whoring.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:56 PM
1

As pointed out, the chans are not sexist, they're anti-identity which is most often expressed at women who want their pussy pass on the chans. I have a penis and my favourite food is biscuits. Can you see a problem with that statement? You do not need to know my genitals to know that I like biscuits. You do not need to know that I like biscuits if you're interested in my penis. The two things do not go together, it's useless information that does not matter. Her sex does not matter, this is on p…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 01:46 PM
6

This video isn't scary because she has schizophrenia, it's scary because someone might think these people are actually stalking her and white knight her. Mental health staff who take patients out of the ward are told never to chase them if they run away because the public won't understand the situation and may assault you. It's better to just let them run and try to catch up with them where they're likely to turn up (family/friends houses). I imagine the same would apply here, let her rant and r…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:15 AM
2

Stay calm, back away from the situation and make sure you're aware of what is going on around you. The vast majority of mentally ill people aren't violent and won't become violent if you don't give them a reason to. It's scary to deal with, but if you stay in control, try to deescalate the situation by talking calmly and not making any sudden moves you can get most mentally ill people in a state where you can get them help. If they're violent, well you're screwed as with any violent person, you …
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:12 AM
1

Welcome to the red pilled community my friend, he is completely and utterly fucked and this is one of the things we're fighting against. Get a good lawyer and hope for the best, the system is heavily against him and you will be lucky to get out of the situation you're in even if it's proven it's not his kid. Some places consider you raising a child for any amount of time being more important than DNA, so even if you prove it's not his kid, he may still be responsible for it. Do your research int…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:58 AM
1

Because if you're fighting for equal rights you shouldn't be continuing the system that makes women more important than men.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:52 AM
1

It's not a picture of him.. Jesus fuck I give up. You cannot understand the culture what so ever, you cannot understand what the post even says. His penis is relevant to the conversation and if you could read the post you would understand.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:36 AM
1

The explanation is in the exact post you're saying is hypocritical, can you learn to read or shut up?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:22 AM
5

Ask her if she thinks with the rise of movements like Gamergate and the atheist community fighting off feminist invasions, are we seeing the backlash against feminism that she thinks will finally mortally wound it or if it's too embedded in society to stop now. People often ask her about things we all understand, but I think we need to move the conversation a step ahead and start asking about solutions. It's fine saying "you have cancer" to someone, but if you don't start to plan their treatment…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:01 AM
1

It's like trying to have a discussion with someone about a coral reef when they don't understand what water is, it's entirely pointless to even try. If you educated yourself shit lord, you would understand why it's impossible for me to hold this conversation with you with your current level of understanding.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:47 AM
-3

No it isn't. There is no reason why this needs to be pointed out that it's a woman posting. Her vagina has zero relevance to the post.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:26 AM
0

And this is why channers hate Reddit, because they don't want identities on the internet.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:24 AM
1

I can't remember now, it was in the book "The victim's revolution". Look it up and give it a read, it does into detail about it.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:38 PM
1

Seriously you have no idea what you're talking about, you really just need to shut up and go learn about image board culture.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:37 PM
2

Some universities only took on black studies after bomb threats. If you consider black studies being part of university life to be part of the civil rights movement then you can count those as I do.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:09 PM
1

Anonymous does not have an a gender, that is the point of being anonymous. You default to nothing. The user does not exist in any way shape or form. They aren't even human, it could be a dog or a cat or a robot writing the posts. You could be talking to Obama, your own sister or some guy you've never heard of.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:08 PM
3

Obliviously male user picture Can you please get a clue about what you're talking about? Just a small one? Please? You might not look like such an idiot then.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:06 PM
1

The UK actually isn't as bad as the US because our culture is vastly different. While Americans want to WIN WIN WIN, the UK wants a fair game. Take Cricket for example, there is a rule that says "if the umpire thinks it's unsporting then it's against the rules", and that sums up the UK culture very well. If you can convince someone that what is going on is unfair, they will support you making it fair.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:25 PM
5

What sort of experts do you think these would be? Do you think they would be trained counselors with a background in nursing or other medical fields or do you think they would be feminists claiming to be experts the same way Laci Green claims she's an expert on sex? Having a school counselor who you could speak to privately about this would be fantastic, but they need to be properly trained and have access to resources to help people. One of the problems is even if we got fully trained support, …
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:22 PM
4

Take a look into sexual harassment stuff and notice how heavily it leans in women's favour. Apply that across all of these sort of things and you get the picture basically. No one cares if a man is abused, they find it funny, everyone cares when a woman is upset and will drop everything to help her. One of these people is going to win a lawsuit hands down. That's my exact stance, if you can prove me wrong then I'll change my opinion, until then I'll fight tooth and nail to do what I think is rig…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:11 PM
1

The generation with the highest suicide rate is those who don't have the matching gender roled mates to fit them. Losing their job destroys their only worth in those gender roles as the provider. So by them losing their jobs, they lose the last positive they had in their gender role as everything else has already been taken from them.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:08 PM
16

This is the perfect example of concern trolling and strawmanning at once. It reads "men have issues, but this guy said something about fucking children, so all men's rights activists are pedophiles". I especially like the Paul Elam quote, because fighting against feminism is basically on par with wanting to fuck 12 year olds. The cherry on the side bar listing 3 instances of women abusing children or murdering people for sexual pleasure and how small one of their sentences was for starving her c…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:01 PM
8

Their job is to make minorities not sue them. If a white person claims racist treatment they will be laughed at, if a man claims sexism they will be laughed at. They won't let you do it because you're a woman and if you got hurt you could sue them for injuring yourself. It's safer to let men do it and people rarely challenge that unless they're trying to prove a point, and then they usually give up once they have done it once and think the battles been won even though nothing changed.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:54 PM
2

Here's a news article on it. The generation had the highest as young men and now the highest as mature men.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:35 PM
6

And you're missing the point entirely. Men are not men on the Internet, they're anonymous users, they do not go "I am a man so", their sex is completely void on the Internet. These men don't claim to be men, you don't even know if they are men, they could be women. And that is what they're trying to preserve. Anonymous culture on the Internet. You're deflecting your own insecurities not them, but please continue to preach your bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:25 PM
3

4chan got overrun by people parodying 4chan, so their opinion is invalid. "I AM A WOMAN THIS UPSETS ME" is not a valid topic title when discussing women only shopping trolleys.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:44 PM
3

You just wrote the biggest load of bullshit possible. You do not understand the culture you're talking about what so ever. It's like you saw someone in a top hat and went "clearly he is a thief! He is wearing a large hat so he can put stolen items under it". The culture promotes being anonymous, no sex, no gender, no age, no race, no personality. You are nothing, you do not matter, if you think you matter you're wrong. The only thing that matters is the content it's self. Who made it is irreleva…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:26 PM
9

They do it because every time someone writes a hit piece more people question them and start looking into the target. They investigate and find the target group isn't anything like the hit piece said and gain sympathy for them.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:55 PM
-6

Saying you're a woman on the Internet changes how people react to you, as you just said about GWW and Typhoon Blue. So if you announce you're a woman for no good reason, you're asking for special treatment before you even make your statement. These screencaps from 4chan will explain it a bit better.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:11 PM
2

I think if you used one no one would have a problem with it honestly. Point at the kids and go "you want to handle these monsters with a normal trolley?"
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:41 AM
-8

This is the internet, stop trying to get your female perks by mentioning you're a woman. It is not relevant to the conversation and you're just looking for the perks of having a vagina. If something upsets you then it upsets you as a person, not because you have a hole between your legs where others have a stick. Be a human being before a woman, not a woman before a human being.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:39 AM
8

I sent an e-mail stating I was concerned about allowing a gender focused group become arbiters of a domestic violence bill and that I was concerned about vulnerable people in society being abused and not having the legal protection they deserve because the gatekeepers would be too heavily focused on women and their own power grab to help them. Be careful when you mention advocacy groups though, we don't want to say "no advocacy groups" and then shoot others in the foot when they mention the men'…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:36 AM
26

The discrimination hotline will laugh you off the phone line. No one considers it discrimination if the target is male. Give them a call though, if nothing else it might be educational to you.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 10:22 AM
1

I never said I supported it, I think it's something men and women have to fix together and there are some great women in the movement. I can look at these MGTOW's logic and I can say "yea, that's a reasonable response, I can see how you got there" and accept their opinion as different to mine but a valid one. There are women who have way too much attention and power over the movement because they're women. Not everyone has worked their asses off like Karen has and deserves their place at the tab…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:42 AM
-1

Look into generational statistics, the highest rate of male suicide in any generation is the generation of men who grew up with the first generation of modenised women. There is a solid connection there to support my point.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:38 AM
-1

Men got a stable family unit in return, they got support from their family (especially their wife). A stable marriage is the healthiest place for a man to be mental health wise, so a traditional set up is far more beneficial to a man than anti-traditionalists want to admit.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:36 AM
1

Considering most of the iconic people in the movement are women, and MGTOW don't trust women, I would consider it a reasonable stance. Some parts of the MGTOW philosophy think women are manipulative and will try and co opt anything they can for their own purposes, if they see the MHRM being filled with women, then yes they're going to be upset about that. May I remind you that the reason AVFM and MGTOW are now at odds is because a woman declared that being married and being a MGTOW are not at od…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:08 AM
-10

Suicide rates increasing is because IMO men like their traditional gender roles and have had those taken away. Men like being useful, being the protector and the provider, they live being constructive and taking care of things. Modern society has completely ripped those parts of society away and left men with no where to fulfill those needs. The job market has completely changed, society is now safe enough that men don't need to be protectors and when a man wants to spend time around a child he'…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:01 AM
2

Vasectomy does not stop you getting people pregnant, the odds are like an incredibly small number (think from here to the sun of 0s) but it is still possible. So even if you have a vasectomy, she's on the pill and you use a condom you can still get her pregnant. edit : I forgot words.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:15 AM
3

I don't think you understand what hacking actually is and how these things work.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:13 AM
2

People's natures can change, people are easy to be around when you're in love but you don't know how they will act when there is bitterness between you. I don't know the story with your ex, but if every woman has the power to ruin your life, it's a logical response to side step all of them.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:59 AM
2

And why should I care? MGTOW is about going your own way, if that means you become a goat herder then that's what it entails, if its that you make videos pointing out how shitty women are then that is what it entails. I don't like much MGTOW stuff, but you shit talking them does nothing but prove them right. When they reject women and start pointing out the problems with them they're seeing you start trying to shame them. The fact that even by disengaging from women and building their own commun…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:58 AM
2

You should put a rider into all your interview agreements, they must supply you with half a pound of icing sugar, a new razor blade and a hooker's boob (rest of hooker optional) if they want to do a photoshoot.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:51 PM
5

TRP is tarred with the same brush as the MRA is. Everyone is saying how terrible it is and not many people are going to investigate it themselves. It's unfair to label all MGTOWS as misogynistic pieces of shit, stop trying to stir trouble. There are plenty of MGTOWs who simply believe women are too dangerous to interact with in the current political climate and wish to avoid spending their life in prison or slavery to them. It's a reasonable response when you look at the legal situation.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:11 PM
-4

As I said, historically violence has played a key role in civil rights victories. If all you ever do is ask people not to do something they're going to ignore you, when you stand up and force them not to do it, they can't ignore you. The Women's rights movement and the men's rights movement both have their birth in the 1900 era, one of them had a complete over whelming victory and the other got completely ignored. I'm not advocating violence, I'm saying historically this has been the catalyst in…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:52 PM
2

It's likely that one of the youtube reviewers will jump on this and give it a break down in the near future. People like Saragon of Akkad use it as their bread and butter.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:40 PM
-1

Realistically? Violence. I don't support it and I wouldn't encourage others, but look at any other civil rights movement and what created the turning points and you will see behind it all there was violent protests and riots. Look at the black panthers and the black civil rights movement. Some of their victories came from going "well, you wouldn't want us to keep planting bombs in your universities would you? Might want to listen to us or... you know, we might keep doing it". DISCLAIMER : I AM N…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 09:22 PM
4

they aren't nefariously running around trying to sabotage men at every turn. You must be new here friend. That is exactly what they are trying to do. Why do you think they're so anti-Men's rights? If they weren't trying to sabotage men as opposed to getting equal rights they would support the MHRM.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:22 AM
-1

So you're saying the jews disfigured little boys to make profit on the lotion industry? /pol/ is always right.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:20 AM
27

Go tell /r/wikiinaction that there isn't an on going feminist war on Wikipedia right now, see how that turns out for you. They have their hooks into it and are trying to manipulate it to fit their views. They will delete as many articles as they can get away with to push their feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:44 PM
3

Didn't know money had a sex, guess now we know all money is male we should burn it for oppressing women. Because you know, a patriarchy is defined by a male rulership, if money and power rules society then men cannot be to blame for it because women can have both of those things. Even if you say "Well men have money and power", you deny that women control the majority of relationships. Yes a man might earn more money, but the woman is usually the one who decides how it gets spent.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:42 PM
1

Private scholarships tend to involve people with far more money than the feminists have, they have lawyers who would eat them alive if they tried to pull their shaming bullshit on them.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:31 PM
1

The people in charge are pro-feminist, there is quite a strong anti-feminist community here if you keep an eye on the front page. Anti-feminist and Tumblr mocking often gets up there.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:27 PM
1

But currently it is a throw away that just asked for 10k to set up a PO box. Can you see the issue with that?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:14 AM
1

You're completely delusional if you think people are going to take birth control on mass. And birth control should not be free, male or female, you make a choice to have sex, so you should pay for protection yourself. This isn't like health problems which randomly hit you, it's an active choice.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:13 AM
1

Do you want to always be a second class citizen because you were born a man? You have to fight to change things or they never will.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:11 AM
2

Using a throwaway at all makes it suspicious though, if you want the credibility of that name then you need to use that name not ask someone behind the scenes (people you're also working with as a team I might add) to vouch for you.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 06:00 PM
3

But posted under a throw away account with 4 submissions, 3 of which were charity related. Could you see how that might make you look suspicious?
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:11 PM
1

The recriporaction and gratitude has been a healthy relationship in the past, it's the healthiest environment for a male to be in in regards to their happiness, work ethics and emotional support. The vast majority of men don't want to be openly emotional, not because they're ashamed of their emotions but because it doesn't feel right to them. I can show my emotions and I show them when needed, but I don't want to blubber my eyes out to just any random person. I want a single point of emotional r…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:44 PM
2

It's where the money is, when have feminists ever wanted to work hard for their gains? They demand an equal share in everything, even if they don't work for it. Same story as ever. The tech industry isn't hostile to women, it's just not bent over backwards for them.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:29 PM
1

Is it not possible that they're so invested in feminism but so tight fisted they think the pay gap is real and are trying to exploit it? Don't we always say "if women were paid 23% less everyone would use them?"
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:25 AM
4

This is being handled very poorly and won't see any support because of it. Bitcoins are difficult to track and you could very easily just be looking for a quick buck and scamming people. Every other charity uses open funding methods like Paypal and Credit cards because it gives the donator some assurance that if something goes bad they can get a refund. This is without making charities jump through hoops to use crypto currencies. Most charities are not full of people comfortable with technology,…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:57 AM
17

You're going to get bad reactions any time you challenge someone on their beliefs, most people don't like being told they're wrong and need to reconsider their opinion. The popular opinion is that women need love and support, that women should be cherished and protected. When you challenge that you not only upset them on an intelligence level but also an instinctive level, you're challenging the very core of modern society and asking them to look behind the curtain. It's very uncomfortable to do…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:47 AM
1

If you're going to go that route then the same as Infanticide, closest parallel you could come to it.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:30 AM
2

The bitching is simple. Money. People don't care about having a silence of a cheese cake covered in shit, but they want a slice of that world class one made with only the best ingredients. Women were told they could do everything a man could and think they deserve the top paying jobs just like men have. The problem is no one told them how much hard work it is to get those jobs and how boring it can be, so now they're demanding equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:27 AM
1

Men are increasingly killing themselves year over year as gender roles have broken down. They struggle to find purpose and so kill themselves. They think they want freedom but when you give them near complete freedom they have no purpose and kill themselves. It's like in GTA, if you have missions to do you can play for hours, if you have no missions and can do anything, you will play for 20 minutes then get bored. Men thrive when given objectives and goals, removing them from society makes mean …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 10:25 AM
1

If a life is endangered by the birth then abortion is an acceptable solution. But "I'm not ready to have a baby" is not a good reason for an abortion, that is the logical conclusion I have come to. And Abortion is pre-emptive murder. You are taking an action to stop someone else from being alive. You're making a conscious choice to stop them existing. Abortion is murder isn't a huge stretch.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 05:01 AM
1

Gender does not come into it, my logic is simple. Even if you have an incredibly shitty life and end up beaten, bullied, unloved and abused, you have a chance to change that, you have potential to make something of yourself. If you're given the old coat hanger then you don't. I consider a potential life to be valuable and think abortion is pre-emptive murder. I understand "it's just cells" and all those arguments, but everyone who was ever alive was at one point just cells, choosing to end their…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:42 AM
1

So if I have a 1 year old baby and I decide I don't want to be a parent any more I can throw it in the river and be done with it? I'm not consenting to be a parent any more, my consent is withdrawn, so I shouldn't have to be one any more and can kill the bloody thing right? You consider the rights of the parents to be more important than the rights of the child. I consider the right to be born to be incredibly important.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:13 AM
2

I don't know, ask Dewy and Louie. ;)
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:09 AM
1

I think we both have the same situation but you look at things on a larger scale, where as I look at things on a smaller scale. I don't think either of us is right or wrong, it's just how we look at the world and that's a good thing. :) Courts have been known to discard prenups when they don't seem fair to the judge. A few tears and a "I'm a poor helpless woman" and your prenup isn't worth the paper it's written on sadly.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:04 AM
3

I cannot find the study after a quick Googling, everything pops up is about the fake wage gap instead. I'll keep looking, I heard it on a video by /u/girlwriteswhat if I recall correctly. There is a bigger push for women in tech than ever and yet we have fewer women in tech today than previously. If you make a big push you will see a small percentage increase, but the moment you stop that push it will return to the same levels as it was before. You cannot permanently force people into positions …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:02 AM
7

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf?sequence=1
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:49 AM
1

No, you don't share all things after a divorce, that is bullshit. What is mine is mine, what is yours is yours. Anything which was shared should be split in an agreeable fashion and both partners are now on their own to make their own way in the world. If a kid is younger than 18 then they are still owed support until that point. Not all companies give you a severance package, some just tell you to GTFO and not come back again. Consider it more like a contract, "you will do this job until we no …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:48 AM
2

Any man showing anger and refusing to compromise is considered an extremist to them. They don't understand if someone is kicking you in the balls repeatedly you're not going to agree to a compromise where you're only being kicked in the knee, you're going to demand all kicking stops.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:38 AM
3

Many of us got here through facts and being sick of bullshit. We're willing to talk things out because it was talking and coming to logical conclusions with the evidence provided that brought us here. Many of us aren't MRAs, we just see the complete bullshit going on and don't think it's fair. We're mercenaries who go where the facts lead us.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:36 AM
1

Deadbeat dads is an issue the MRM deals with though, trying to get male reproductive rights is part of it and that would prevent Dad's who cannot be responsible for their kids to not be, so they couldn't be deadbeats as they would never be expected to pay in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:15 AM
1

MRAs cannot work with feminists, they have tried countless times and it simply does not work. Feminists are the enemy because they make themselves the enemy. Read this comment and I think you will understand why MRAs see feminsm as the enemy. Just because 1 cop said something stupid doesn't mean that universally applies. I can find plenty of stupid statements by cops, that is a single one off case and you're using an exception to justify the rule. Equality is impossible, women cannot handle bein…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:08 AM
6

It's been shown that the more freedom you give to people the narrower their choices become. Women now have more freedom of employment so head into industries that interest them the most rather than pay the most or pay enough to survive on over their preferred career that would not. The reason women aren't in tech is because they don't want to be in tech. We gave them choices and they picked to go else where.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:02 AM
12

The problem is if you're a princess and everyone has always treated you like royalty you cannot tolerate being treated like a common worker. Many geeky communities treat women equal to men and they think they're being mistreated. There was a study done which showed in an equal situation with an equal response, people will think you're being sexist towards the woman when you treat them equally. Doesn't matter if a man or a woman is judging, society cannot handle equality, which is what many geeky…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:58 AM
2

What exactly is wrong with being anti-abortion? People who don't support abortions are considered monsters because they think someone deserves the chance at life, even if it may not be the greatest chance. I am anti-abortion because I value potential people and don't want them denied their life because it's inconvenient to the mother. Yes it will hurt or leave a scar, but every day things can hurt me and it doesn't justify removing someone else's future because of it.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:36 AM
1

It's not a strawman when it's the public, academic and institutional face of feminism. Stop trying to hide behind a straw man by claiming everything you don't want to face is a straw man, it's straw manception.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:26 AM
3

The wage gap is completely and utterly debunked. Feminists are not fighting for the "misconception that some women were asking to be raped", they're asking that women aren't responsible for their actions. You can't lead someone on, tease them, then go back to their bed room and go "you wanted to have sex with me? You monster!" Personal responsibility plays a part in a lot of rape cases and feminists want to completely remove personal responsibility and expectations from being considered in rape …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:24 AM
1

3rd wave is 4th wave, 3rd wave has become a dirty word so they're trying to distance themselves from it by claiming the tumblr types are 4th wave, but they simply aren't. 1st wave had set goals, 2nd had set goals, 3rd and 4th have patriarchy theory and nothing separates them.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:15 AM
0

I disagree, you ultimately make the choice to not work. You get paid by your partner to do so, they pay for your rent, your food, your clothing and all your other expenses. The fact that you chose that "career" is your own fault and no one else, you went into it knowing its a dead end career and if you ever get "fired" then you lose everything. Lets apply your logic to burger flipping. It pays your rent, it keeps you fed and clothed. If McDonalds decides to fire you, does McDonalds now owe you m…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:11 AM
10

How does it go again?...oh, yeah, you can't be both the oppressor and victim. And there we have it folks. A feminist admits men aren't oppressors.. no wait a second, they're just saying men can't be raped because they're oppressive. The double think is infuriating. Men speak up to say they were abused and no one gives a fuck and the response is "sit down and STFU, women are bigger victims than you are, I bet you liked being raped didn't you, you sick fuck?"
/r/MensRights20/02/15 06:41 PM
1

You should go see a therapist and talk it through with them. You won't find magic solutions, but you will at least be forced to rationalize your thoughts and justify them to another person. This is often what makes you reconsider your thoughts and work through them internally. Just knowing you have to explain things to someone else can be all you need to figure out your issues and come to terms with them.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 06:37 PM
1

Reading this stuff makes me even more unsure about engaging with women. Obviously all women aren't rapists, but with all the bullshit going on it makes one wonder if maybe it's best to just say fuck it I'm out, go MGTOW and call it a day. I have a relationship just starting to build at the moment and it's made me really unsure if I want to chase it or not.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 06:33 PM
7

Women were property in the same way a dog is property. You're responsible for them but if they want to get up and leave you can't stop them. Then you're responsible for any of the damage they do while they're out on their own. Men were the head of the family, responsible for taking care of everything, including safety of each member and making sure they were well fed and looked after to a reasonable standard. The women was responsible for.. er.. erm.. absolutely nothing, but if she wasn't kept i…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:40 PM
8

Why would you? Their objective is to come sit with you, you're objective is to sit with them, you standing is counter productive.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:33 PM
2

I'm not misandric, I don't judge men on being men and think they're all assholes or anything. I just don't enjoy the company of other men much. There are exceptions but not many. I'm not a social person by default and I don't care to get into pissing contests, which is a lot of male social structures which I just don't enjoy.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:40 AM
1

Legal enforcement would be stuff like alimony, child support and divorce laws, which are the big issues. You will never have it socially acceptable to go against being popular. It's impossible because society needs that pressure to exist. Consider a society without any social pressures, imagine all the worst parts of humanity and picture how they act being universally acceptable. I firmly believe that humanity will act as evil as they can get away with, those social pressures are one of the few …
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:35 AM
2

The best way to write an e-mail like this is to make it personal and show you have experience with their company. I liked your product X because..., I used it for Y years. But because of Condition A I will no longer be buying/supporting you. I would like to as I have liked your product/service in the past, but as long as Condition A is still going on/employed by you, I cannot in good conscious do so.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:22 AM
1

I disagree with the anti-gender roles people, I think gender roles build an effective society and help guide people through life. Ultimately men and women have different preferences and many don't know what to do with their lives, giving them a guiding hand and helping bring the best out of them is not a bad way to make a productive society. There is a big difference between noticing that women are better at X and men are better at Y so encouraging those talents and being oppressed by social nor…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:21 AM
3

I'm in the same boat as you, I'm not a Men's right advocate, I don't care that much about men's rights activism (hear me out here). I'm an anti-feminist because I can't stand the bullshit they're spewing. My sense of fair play is being set off and I want to try and even up the playing field because what is going on is not cricket. I advocate for disabled rights, I focus my time there because that is something that effects me more than men's rights issues, but both issues are interlocked. If a di…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:16 AM
1

People don't understand them, they see them on talk shows like Jerry Springer and buy into the bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:30 PM
3

Don't look at yourself as a survivor, look at yourself as a scout. You went into enemy territory, the worst in the land and you saw what it was like. When you see other people approaching that territory you can now warn them, plant warning signs and make it so others don't go into the places you went first. Your experience and knowledge is valuable to share, use it whenever you can. Every sharp edge you have from being hurt, is an edge you can use to protect others, they aren't bad edges, you ju…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 08:43 AM
2

I strongly disagree on your assessment of geek culture. Being a geek it's self is making a stand against society, you're saying "no, I won't chase fame and riches, I won't chase what is popular. I will do what I enjoy and I don't care what you think of me". The problem is until recently with stuff like Gamergate, geeks have had no reason to get political. They kept off the radar, did their thing and were left alone beyond the odd people going "eww a geek" or a mainstream media smear campaign tha…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 08:21 AM
4

Society would collapse if that happened, men work more hours, so we would become less productive with women at the top. Wages would be lower and less children would be born. This is without the problem that if you have a large group of purposeless people they turn destructive. If you alienated all the men, half will go MGTOW and half will go savage and turn to crime and cheap thrills. We're seeing this happen in modern society now, as gender roles are broken down people lose their desire to live…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:10 AM
1

It basically says that men should develop like women, it's downright anti intellectual and denies the existence of biology. Men do not want to be women, they have their own ways of dealing with things. They turn to self reflection and constructive hobbies. If they need emotional support they will turn to their partner or their family. I don't want to be overly emotional in public, to me crying in public is equal to losing your temper in public. I would rather channel my emotions into doing somet…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 12:12 AM
11

I've noticed that women don't understand men, a lot of them have this weird disconnect between being human and being male. They see children and then they see adults, they see none of the in between or any of the stuff men go through to become the adults they do or take on the roles they do in society. A lot of them are being raised in places hostile to men and will forever see them as the enemy because of this. They won't even try to understand the opposite group, where as their enemy group is …
/r/MensRights12/02/15 11:59 PM
2

Men being sexually used by women in charge of them has everything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:18 PM
2

Because if I stuff your wallet full of money you will see exactly what I want you to see as well.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:16 PM
2

You're completely ignoring countless tales of how the lady of the house has the hots for the gardener. Middle class women "like a bit of rough" just as much as lower class women do. And Cougars are a known type of older women who hunt that shit out.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:15 PM
0

By your logic we should only eat 1 type of food ever, never any other type of food because one type of food must be the best kind and no others should exist. Voat is a Reddit style site that values free speech above all else. Reddit has shown that it doesn't care about free speech and users who do aren't welcome. So Voat is an alternative Reddit site to those of us who value free speech and freedom from an admin team full of feminists.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:59 PM
1

Exoduses take time, it's a small site which has the potential to be a safe port when Reddit collapses. At one point Reddit was a small site, it took of when Digg collapsed and caused an exodus. The people on Voat now aren't there because it has the huge userbase, they're the scouts setting up the foundations of camps. They're scouting the area, finding the safe areas, where food grows and water flows.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:57 PM
1

Feminists were the only people who didn't walk away after the battle was over, so they got to decide how the history was written up. They completely erased everyone but themselves.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:53 PM
7

If you honestly believe that then you can't be helped. You stand no hope of finding any political party that won't do that. It's not got any better since the tories took power, the same shit carried on as Labour did.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:45 PM
2

Did you follow Gamergate at all? I'll rest my case with that.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:54 PM
0

If someone is constantly attacking you and saying you shouldn't exist, then you are well within reasonable standards to hate that person and fight to remove them from power at every opportunity. One of the key parts of the MRM is that it needs to tear down feminism so there is more room at the gender politics table. Currently feminism is so fat that it's got the table stuck in it's belly folds and no one else can even find it.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:13 AM
1

You're completely wrong, numbers don't mean shit when there is a power imbalance. 100 people try to edit the MRM article, 1 admin bans all of them, reverts the changes and nothing was changed. We saw this time and time again with the Gamergate article, people would try to fix things and end up banned for it.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:46 PM
1

I believe there at studies that show men and women only have 10% personality overlap. Why shouldn't men be afraid of being raped on the street? Rape isn't as bad as being murdered is, and violent encounters are more likely for men then women. So shouldn't it be men scared of the streets not women?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:37 PM
-5

Why wouldn't you help? You calmly walk up to them and ask them what's wrong and try to point them where they need to go. Who the fuck wouldn't do that?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:45 AM
2

You very clearly have an agenda here which is overruling basic logic. Not all people who are circumcised have PTSD. If that was the case every any one touched a penis in America they would have a very high chance of some kind of backlash and it just isn't so. And yes I have read it, I don't trust sources that quote very small sample sizes as an example as the 3rd article does in multiple places.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:39 PM
4

Don't try and be a smart arse because someone caught you out presenting the facts in a manipulative way. You presented it in a way that makes casual browsers have a completely warped view of the situation and then go "YOU EMBARRASSED YOURSELF BY POINTING THIS OUT!"
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:16 PM
2

You're not comparing fair statistics here. You're comparing ritual circumcision in the Philippines and then rape and veterans in the US. That's quite a different thing right there.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:44 PM
0

That doesn't change shit. All snark communities are the same. They're a bunch of assholes playing "point out the other brand of asshole". They can't see they're as bad as the feminists circle jerk but in their own special way.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:05 PM
2

Tumblrinaction isn't about how insane feminists are, it's about laughing at how insane people are. They aren't there for the feminism but, they're there for the freak show.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:59 PM
2

Thank you for being racist by recommending Killing floor because I'm British (I'm joking btw). I'm tired of Killing floor, played it for ages but burnt out on it.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:38 PM
3

Language is important and you shouldn't hide it away though. If someone kicks your dog you're right to scream "YOU FUCKING BASTARD!" in their face. Civilized language doesn't mean you never swear, it means you swear when it is needed. Don't fear words, words have power and you should use them as you need them, but never use them carelessly.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:38 PM
-1

From what I can gather, they think the world is harsh so they should be ALPHA MALE so no one can hurt them or take advantage of them. They want to be dominant because it's the only way to protect themselves. TRP is basically capitalism and Men's right is communism.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:33 PM
16

I'm a British dude, if I speak on voice chat then I get British jokes made at me. I think a lot of people need to realise gaming culture enjoys taking the piss, snarky comments and jokes are thrown at everyone. I don't always agree with it, but you get joked at for being a woman, I get joked at for being British. That is one of the big issues I see with people trying to move into gaming, they have no concept of a "friendly insult" and it really upsets them when one is thrown at them. I find this…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:27 PM
7

Everyone hates the CoD kids, there is a reason why people make jokes how if you go on Xbox live you will be called a faggot almost immediately. It's stupid kids mouthing off and the majority of people just don't want to deal with them. The problem is, they have the biggest mouths, so they're heard more than the dude who discusses games with his friends on Steam and doesn't voice chat or take part in forums unless it's needed.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:08 PM
10

You didn't point out that a lot of the hate for girl gamers(key word here, they aren't gamers, they are GIRL gamers.) comes from the way the community treats girls in the opposite direction. If you join a game and everyone is drooling over a girl to the point where it disrupts the game, it gets very irritating. If you go to Twitch and see a girl with no real personality or interest in games massing viewers because she has a low cut top, it's very irritating. In general, I find the gaming communi…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:05 PM
5

"Oh, we dated for a while a long time ago", any thing more is going to make people uncomfortable or jealous. They don't need to know the details and you aren't winning any brownie points for sounding like you're still strung up on her.
/r/seduction08/06/14 09:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter