TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Odonata_Anisoptera Archive

View 0 posts and 77 comments by Odonata_Anisoptera on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Looool, if that doesn't make much sense... Idk, man. Reading comprehension is pretty important for any kind of discussion. I think I've gotta agree, I really don't want to waste any more time on this. Thanks for understanding.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 08:45 AM
1

"When legitimate feminists talk about mysogyny, they refer to systematic oppression." "The ones that generally equate misogyny with systematic oppression, as per my comment's indication." You're telling me this wasn't enough for you to figure it out? It's practically being spoonfed...
/r/MensRights08/01/20 05:18 AM
1

The ones that generally equate misogyny with systematic oppression, as per my comment's indication. God, you can't even troll correctly. Even if you were able to miraculously conjure a real point there, you'd still have to contend with everything else you've been knocked off of during this discussion You're like the lost at sea, desperately clinging to the debris of your wrecked ship for anything at all that will keep you afloat, no matter how tiny or temporary.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:07 AM
1

And what's a non-legit feminist? Anyone that disagrees with you? I felt the need to insert a qualifier simply because of how often you refer to feminism as if the entire movement has no place here. You've made your points clearly, yes, but if you want anyone to take them seriously you have plenty more to say.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 10:53 PM
1

It doesn't have to fit some arbitrary template for "systematic oppression" for it to be a gender based issue for men. Firstly, that's not arbitrary in the slightest, and yes, actually, it does need to fit that template. Otherwise your "men's issue" is actually just /r/zeerust2000's and friends issue. The way you use language as a weapon makes you sound like feminist. Who cares? I could sound like a fucking elephant for all I care. You understand my points, that's all that matters. If 'misogyny' …
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:38 PM
1

Care about? No. I'm asking the same question I've been asking and challenging from the beginning. Is this a men's rights issue? In other words, does this instance represent systematic oppression of men? And the answer to both of those is a resounding "no". Regardless of how many people care about this instance of a woman writing a dumb article, it does not affect us And just to reiterate; I care deeply about our issues. There are major, gaping holes where men fall through the systematic cracks. …
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:51 PM
1

Bro. This is an opinion article. You gonna post every article that you find "demonises men as a class?" Unless this article is costing you jobs, preventing you from getting access to basic needs or in any other way, you know, actually affecting your day-to-day life, this is not a men's rights issue. It's you and, like, 1K other redditors searching for articles you find disparaging and then brooding about them one by one.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 04:15 AM
-1

I don't think there's anything wrong with thinking the writer is a dumbass. Is this a men's rights issue? Absolutely not. I didn't make my point at all in the first post, and that's my own fault, but that's it. This sub isn't filled with, idk, any men's rights issues except perhaps custody battles as a systemic issue. Why is it littered with singular instances of false rape accusations and now this? Know what I mean? I unsubbed today, after idk like 7 years. The sub just seems like it's full of …
/r/MensRights19/12/19 08:05 PM
-12

I'm more surprised by how many men I see here eating this post up without, you know, actually reading the article. This sub used to be about issues men faced alone. Now it's a hugging room for when men feel like whining about the next thing they've decided is somehow gravely insulting.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:16 AM
1

1 retweet. 1 like. Have you tried reposting something that actually became a movement?
/r/MensRights08/12/19 02:59 AM
16

^ honestly. That was my first thought when I saw it was written under a pseudonym, and when I saw that the original OP said it was the face of feminism and the me too movement. Oh, really? This hyper-aggressive book represents the actual ideologies of two movements? And the idea is to destroy guys? I'd be more likely to believe incels were somehow involved in any or all of this.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 06:13 PM
2

That is expressly not true lol. The law in the US, even in the military, definitely recognizes cases of rape regardless of gender or orientation.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:54 AM
0

O great and all-knowing one, whisper me more of your wisdom
/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:24 AM
1

In other words, you're fucking biased lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:15 PM
0

There's nothing at all wrong with you following that calling. However, expecting everyone else to conform to that same notion is immoral, and you've made it incredibly clear that that is exactly what you expect of others; anything less you view as inferior.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 08:15 PM
2

Yeah it definitely had nothing to do with the part where you made a list of things that bother you and then labeled them as "bad" lol
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:42 PM
1

Thanks for revealing how biased your position is. That makes it much easier to just let this go. Good luck, fool.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:27 PM
1

No, I juxtaposed one set of organs and their evolutionary function to another's, and then applied your thinking to both equally. I.e. an organ's biological function doesn't constitute a necessity or a social or moral obligation to a human.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:13 PM
2

A biological instinct does not equate to a moral or social obligation.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:10 PM
-1

Having reproductive organs doesn't give you a responsibility to have kids any more than having hands and nails gives you a moral responsibility to strangle your enemies, or legs a responsibility to kick them to death. Do you think gay guys and gals should just force themselves into unhappy marriages because they have organs? That's moronic. Your line of thinking is extraordinarily outdated.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:40 PM
9

How is it selfish for him to not want kids..? You're tacitly applauding someone that says that men have a biological responsibility to be straight and have kids with women. That's so backwards it's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:37 PM
1

I think you're misinterpreting what he's saying. It's not about them being interested in your skills, interests, or abilities. It's about them seeing a guy that has his shit together and is content with himself. That catches attention from everyone.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:57 AM
2

You've done all of the above successfully and have a good girlfriend. So... In other words it was successful. Not only that, but it's not really a formula. That guy is saying that you should just focus on yourself rather than try to fit into the great mystical woman in the sky's weird matrix of qualifications.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:54 PM
1

You are dangerously close to becoming an incel, something I say out of love for you and other men approaching this line of thought. These expectations you're mentioning may very well exist, but they're just that; expectations. Meaningless ones at that. Women in general are not at fault for your attempt at trying to fit into all of those responsibilities and categories. You are. And as a few have recommended down below: Don't. There is little point to trying to make yourself into history's versio…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:50 PM
5

This is what I came here to ask. This subreddit is kind of a dumpster fire these days. It'll keep you warm alright, but the smell sticks with you long after you've gone.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 02:53 PM
1

Thank you. I joined this subreddit a few years ago, and, uh... It's kind of turned into a weird twisted caricature of itself. I joined because I wanted to talk about and learn about the serious underlying problems men face and how we could solve them. It wasn't supposed to come at the cost of honesty and rational thought. Thanks for bringing those back. Anyway, keep it up.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 06:45 AM
5

This is something a lot of people don't understand; When you trivialize rape to be practically anything you don't like, you are absolutely shitting on every actual survivor out there. This was more famously and controversially true with the Aziz Ansari story. One of two things happened there; 1) Women are ragdolls, and even though Aziz consistently polled for consent/approval and asked her if she was comfortable or wanted to stop, she was so helpless and powerless that she did anything he sugges…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:19 AM
-10

Innocent until proven guilty is a legal matter. Kavanaugh and anyone else accused of a crime is protected by this, legally, as we all have a right to a fair trial when accused. Innocent until proven guilty does not and will hopefully never apply to social repercussions, which are what Kavanaugh is facing right now, including for job interviews. You can bet your ass an employer has the power to decide whether or not bringing someone accused of serious crimes is bad for the business, and I wouldn'…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:40 PM
17

Really? Date drug rapist vs. guy who was given a consensual bj?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:28 AM
169

This is the right answer. We can't pretend the guy is at all innocent or the woman is just being a "whiny bitch". If someone offers to get you drinks, guy/girl, girl/guy, X/X, whatever, it's universally implied that the person offering is paying. Switch the gender roles and you can sure as hell but that a guy would be just as pissed if a woman offered him drinks on his own tab. Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:26 AM
4

What would the "Wage Gap" look like if we also counted the homeless and rough living population?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:54 AM
2

Yeah. My problem with feminism is not their ideas. You're allowed to have a different idea, and honestly, I usually side with them on big issues. What I can't stand is these things; manipulating a serious discussion by using public outrage to circumvent the barrier or actually having to have a structured argument It's not even that it's too hard for them- it's just much easier to hit back with all of this bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:27 AM
3

I guess so, but what can you do? Persisting on any point becomes; 1) Unsolicited Commentary 2) Invalidation of women's perspectives 3) Mansplaining 4) Focusing on Semantics 5) Ignoring women's pain and suffering 6) Making the conversation all about you (men) 7) Part of the Problem 8) Overreaction And more bafflingly: 1) Tone Policing 2) Respectability Politics 3) You are sucking up free femme labor, it's not free, pay me you misogynist ass Edit: For clarification, I'm not saying women so this by…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 04:36 PM
11

Facebook banned that hashtag specifically. I had a massive argument over why that was justified; #menaretrash is a prejudiced phrase. They eventually agreed, but likened it to a generalized warning like you use with dangerous things.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:17 AM
4

They're not being any of those. You give her too much credit in this case. It just looks like the snippy activism that sells. When I see stuff like this, I like to ask myself how people would likely respond. If it merits an intellectual retort, it's because it was thought out and is genuine. But if the most likely response is gonna be "YAASSSS KWEEN, YASSS" or "👏LOUDER FOR THE WYBEBO IN THE BACK👏" you can safely assume it's knee-jerk bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:41 AM
12

This is exactly what the post needs for good perspective.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 06:54 PM
0

This person is an idiotic feminist, at best. Feminists I know fully support a woman's right to use her body however she desires. They want to legalize the sex industry (prostitution, stripping, escorts, etc.) They support the same for men.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 11:49 PM
0

I know this is meant to reflect both feminist hypercriticism and actual men's rights issues, but I think this would be far more powerful if it weren't so self-victimizing. Like- isn't that what is mainly disliked about hard feminism? These are serious issues. The stats themselves challenge many feminist assertions, I don't think the self-pitying "Male Privilege" title needs to be present for it.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:20 AM
18

That was the best response, I think. It's true. It's sad and true.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:10 AM
-8

Isn't that still a simple fee? Just because it's more and scales to be "hefty", the end result seems the same. If you can pay, you can do this thing and continue with your life. I mean, I get what you're saying and why it seems like a punishment, but I'm currently more convinced that it's a purchase if there's no time involved. Time will always be priceless.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:50 PM
-4

Not to mention that if you have enough money, instating "hefty fines" is essentially the same as creating a simple price to sexually assault women.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:15 PM
0

So, what percentage of aggressors are men?
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:23 AM
25

∆∆∆ Perfect wording. except for the first line.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:07 PM
3

Agreed. If she has the choice to decide not to have it, so, too, should he.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:06 PM
-2

. . . I mean... Partial credit.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 08:09 AM
8

I just hope we start maturing as a nation. In the past, the vast majority or MRM and WRM activity is exclusive of the other. They pit the rights against one another without ever acknowledging that the two can progress evenly, side by side. That was a huge problem on this sub a couple of years ago, and while you can still see vestiges of it pop up now and then, it's mostly much more mature and self-aware than it was. We just need to keep that up. Men's rights can help women, and Women's rights ca…
/r/MensRights14/01/18 10:28 PM
1

Innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:42 PM
7

Atrocious comparison. It's $3,000... And she had access to it as part of her job, it's not like she staged a five-fold armed robbery plot. Then we have a guy, possibly on meth (definitely using) or at least suffering from its ill effects waving a gun, which probably did look reasonably real.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:41 PM
1

I think the idea is more that men aren't going to be left out of any law. He worded it awfully, but that's why he said men were always in mind when laws are placed. For a long time, that statement was very true. But recently, I can think of a few new instances where men are deliberately left powerless.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:50 AM
56

To be fair, women weren't allowed on the battlefield at that time. Being a Nurse was about as close as you could get. Edit: changed "lose" to "close"
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:16 AM
6

Not only that, it wasn't the patients that halted it. The scientists did, and they dtopped testing because it had caused infertility and possibly even caused a suicide.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:29 AM
1

Technically, things on the right side are associated with "War", not "boy" and "masculinity". In other words, "War" is not necessarily something you associate with the word "Masculinity", but "masculinity" is something you associate with "war". This is supposed to be a one-way-mirror type ad, but they were ignorant and/or very lazy (or just didn't care about how people might interpret it). In this context, "masculinity" and "boy" make total sense. Men have been fighting to protect women and chil…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:35 PM
1

He's accused. That's all that matters. People that get caught talking about what they did still go to trial, and are still innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:53 PM
1

We shouldn't need a criminal case to be determined before determining our views on a public person. And you don't need one. But if you think about it, you don't need this bombardment of accusations either. My point is that I had no trouble thinking of Trump as scum without these accusations because I based his character off of what I knew to be true. We all heard and saw him speak. We've heard recordings, seen videos of his sexual assault over and over. But right now, until trials go through- no…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:47 PM
4

I hate Trump. But he's 100% innocent until proven guilty. That's our law. We don't get to crucify him because we have suspicions that happen to support personal feelings. Edit: I should note that I disagree with OP's decision to suggest that there's a conspiracy against Trump and that these women are coming forward and lying specifically to burn him. Just as Trump is innocent until proven otherwise, so are the women making the accusations. They are innocent of conspiracy until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:22 AM
4

Yes, Musk needs to stop everything- stop SpaceX and Tesla. More female retweets. You can't proceed until you've followed at least 56 women. Not 54, 56 so we're sure you're not just doing it because we asked.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 10:56 AM
1

I... think you need to look up the word "disingenuous". Anyway, trying to characterize me as an angry fireball of rage won't really help you here. Are you a professional in the field, or not? If you are, then an apology is required of me, and I will certainly give it to you. If you're not, then my point still stands. You're an uninformed individual getting worked up about the wrong things in a thread about Men's Rights. Not google's rights, or Men-being-upset-by-things-giant-corporations-support…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:42 AM
1

Name calling? I apologize, Dr. AnotherDAM. I had no idea you were actually a philosopher or professional researcher of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:46 AM
1

I feel like it is something we can measure. Who's in the leadership positions? Who is talking control? Regardless of the subject or gender that the men choose to benefit, isn't it still them making the decisions? Listen. I understand why you're arguing with me over this, and that's your right. I'm probably not really prepared to argue with armchair philosophers that have spent years on this sub. My reason for posting here at all was simply to point out that the OP's post was utter garbage, and s…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:01 PM
1

Very nice. Now that you've gotten a few slaps in, wanna actually contest my point?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 10:54 PM
2

A wasted opportunity.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 10:52 PM
0

....Oooookay. Yeah, clearly my feeble attempts at addressing all of the side arguments that have been brought up are distracting for you poor kids. Let me make this clear: This sub is usually fantastic, and I love to see the subtle and sometimes blatant issues we face given attention. But OP's post demonstrates an overwhelming misinterpretation of what "Men's rights" are. OP's post has no business in this sub. Google, and any other company, has a right to support and advocate for whatever groups…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:49 PM
1

I'm amazed that you gave birth to an entire "linguistic conspiracy theory" from a comment demonstrating my distaste for alliteration. It's an opinion... calm down.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 08:42 PM
0

We're talking about underdeveloped countries. How many times do I need to make that clear, and how is it not clear contextually? Holy shit. Indeveloped countries, equality is extremely blurred. People aren't sure if women are currently equal, unequal, or far behind. And their solutions are also unstable- do we uplift women, uproot men, or seek a remorseless law that benefits neither? In underdeveloped countries where men are the ones allowed into strong state and government ment positions or pla…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:35 PM
1

"Boy blaming?" You use alliteration here? Oh, boy.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:24 PM
1

I understand that just because men have the advantage, they're not necessarily benefiting from it. That's not the point that I'm making at all. We're looking at underdeveloped nations here, and it is my opinion that in these underdeceloped nations, regardless of whether men are doing well or not, they have a much stronger potential than women to change what they need to change to benwfit themselves.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:22 PM
-2

I think they do this in order to- how do I explain this? It's a priority to get women to have a voice. Men probably suffer across the globe, and we know young boys in 3rd world countries have a lot of pressure to forgo education for literally anything else. But because of this, it's safe to assume that in a country dominated by men, they'll usually be pretty good at addressing their own issues. The same usually cannot be said for women in underdeveloped nations. So, in that context, the right th…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 09:25 AM
1

Alright, so I'm well aware that men have some pretty extreme shit that we have to deal with, including a lot of systematic nonsense, but education is a liiiiitle bit different. You see, while it might be true that men are only enrolled in education 10% more than women, I don't think I've ever heard of men being lawfully forbidden to receive an education. You're overthinking the fuck out of this Google ad, and for a festival that you seem to have no idea about and wouldn't have joined anyway. Peo…
/r/MensRights25/09/16 09:12 AM
2

I think the focus of the festival is to support women and girls across the globe. Men and boys are... obviously... invited to attend.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 02:45 AM
3

Was gonna say the same. Fear of retribution, fear of others being told/finding out, fear of court procedures- it's all real stuff. I'm jot defending the woman at all- they're both scum. But victims are victims- there's usually not a gradient scale.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 09:49 PM
12

I wish I had answers for you. Upvoted for visibility.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:10 AM
2

I have nothing to add to this thread but my anger at this sign.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:29 AM
1

Nobody.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:12 PM
1

I don't think there is a "men's rights movement". There is currently a massive movement going towards equality, with all sorts of people participating in the way they think is best. This subreddit is called "mensrights" and serves as a place for people of any sex to express frustration, agreement, new ideas, and anything else that will help us remember that equality is the end goal. You stated that you saw a lot of our posts as simply being negativity towards feminism. Now, that sounds like you …
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:17 PM
8

You think this because you speak as if what you say is indisputable fact, like an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:57 PM
2

:( ... maybe? :3
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:56 PM
3

Honestly though - I work in the stockroom at Target. It's a fantastic job, you get paid more, and you get 8 hours of mild cardio.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter