OhGodWhyyyyyyyy Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
51	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad.	Science	OhGodWhyyyyyyyy	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 07:29 AM
31	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community?	Discussion	OhGodWhyyyyyyyy	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 09:02 PM
14	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar.	Q4Men	OhGodWhyyyyyyyy	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/16 01:26 AM
11	Considering The 80/20 Rule	Red Pill Theory	OhGodWhyyyyyyyy	/r/TheRedPill	26/01/15 05:32 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Yeah, exactly. Even though I did this research, I won't start "writing off" promiscuous people as relationship partners. You're right, they're just as capable of being healthy in long-term relationships. It grinds my gears when people take studies like this and decide the "rational" thing to do is to never get into an LTR with someone who has a primscuous past. By that logic, I ought to start dating exclusively Japanese men; the same study showed that they are up to twice as likely to be happy i…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/03/16 02:23 AM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Yes, I agree. I don't think having a higher number of previous sexual partners actually causes a decrease in marital satisfaction. However, I would like to again point out that men and women are not different in this respect. That's really the point I'm trying to get across. A man who sleeps around a lot is as likely to be dissatisfied in a long-term, monogamous relationship as a woman. I'm just trying to disprove TRP's assertion that men are unaffected by it. I believe promiscuous people, in ge…	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/16 10:25 PM
1	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. I will give you the bit about infidelity, if only because there is insufficient evidence to claim that the reason men cheat on their spouse at twice the rate of women is because of decreased sexual satisfaction. However that was not the point of my post. I meant for the title to be, "Male promiscuity and relationship satisfaction". I don't really care about why men choose to cheat on their wives. That's not the takeaway I'm going for here. But indeed, you have convinced me that it is impossible …	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/03/16 12:27 AM
1	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. I prefer this study because it differentiates between "emotional satisfaction" and "sexual satisfaction". The study that TRP likes to cite does not even include men, nor does it differentiate between the emotional and the sexual. Personally, the only times in my life I've called a man a "creep" were when he continued to hit on me after I've already told him I'm married. I consider that disrespectful and, indeed, creepy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/03/16 09:56 PM
1	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Did you even read my post......? The sources are right there.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/03/16 09:51 PM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. In the study I posted, there are two separate tables: one is, "Odds ratios from logit model of having a happy relationship by gender". The other table on the next page is, "Odds ratios from logit model for being sexually satisfied by gender". The second table shows that a man's sexual satisfaction in a long term relationship is negatively affected (moreso than women) the more partners he had in the past. The first table shows that women's odds of having an overall happy relationship is negativel…	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/03/16 09:50 PM
10	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Men are twice as likely to cheat on their wives, so of course women initiate divorce more often. If cheating on the mother of your children isn't breaking up a family, I don't know what is.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 11:05 AM
3	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. The 3.9% and 5.3% could be figured out using the given data if you were a talented statistician. I don't have the skills to run the numbers, but they seem accurate enough to me given the data presented and the one statistics class I've taken. I gave you the title of the body of data where the Infidelity statistics were pulled. View previous comment. But, at the end of the day, if you're just going to say, "Well, everyone lies!" then there's no getting anywhere with you. Data will not sway you be…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 10:59 AM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Alright, here we go: Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction If you look at Table 4 on page 748, there is a list of stats, separated by gender, which predicts "having a happy relationship". A score of less than 1 in this table means that the variable has a negative effect on relationship satisfaction. A score that is equal to 1 has no effect. A score greater than 1 means it has a positive effect. Both men and women have a negative score in the "number of sexual partners over lifetime" in this categ…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 10:13 AM
3	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. "People die from hunger, it's wrong, it's horrible and it shouldn't happen. Now imagine that many people complain about it and I make an analogy to explain that some people have enough to eat while others don't so these people can understand the problem better." Yeah, except it's more like you said, "We shouldn't even think about it because that's just the way it is." You literally told me to "Stop trying to logic." You didn't offer a solution to world hunger, or a potential reason for its exist…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 10:03 AM
8	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. "Men who get sex easily have something about them that makes them superior. Like I said, it is hard to be a stud." You just contradicted yourself so hard I don't even know where to begin. Men who get sex easily... are actually getting it with difficulty... what...? There are loads of men who can get laid by attractive women whenever they want. Try making a fake profile on Tinderr with a few pictures of an attractive man. You'll see what I mean. People are born with attractive faces. They are no …	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:58 AM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Then we agree, lol. This may be the first time this has ever happened to me on PPD. I may take a screenshot.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:53 AM
4	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Yeah, and then a bunch of people, most of them living in the north (especially this one guy with a really tall, black hat), said, "Hey, y'know what, that's bullshit." Now Black people can vote like everyone else. And, here I am, saying that the idea that men can have as much sex as they want with no consequences is also bullshit. That's all I'm trying to say.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:39 AM
6	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Found it: Models predicting sexual satisfaction included significant physical intimacy and sexual functioning for both genders and, for men, more frequent recent sexual activity and fewer lifetime partners	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:31 AM
4	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. "So you get the lock n key analogy after all." Sort've. Do I believe that people are basically animals who are constantly bombarded by base emotions not based in logic? Yes. Do I think people should accept them as they are and give them catchy names like "lock and key" to make them seem more acceptable? No. Historically, society kept slaves, because hey, the color White is "pure" and the color Black is "dirty", so it makes sense that White people are better than Black people, right...? Right...?…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:22 AM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. It's not. :/	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:15 AM
6	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. I'll be honest, that is literally the only information I could find on male promiscuity vs. marriage satisfaction. It's all just data-enthusiasts who had to pull information from other sources and compile it themselves. That shit is elusive. I found this blogger here comaplining about it. He says, "After re-reviewing the study, I can see that you are correct and that it doesn’t address what effect premarital partners among men has on divorce risk for men. I attempted to find a study that address…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:13 AM
7	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. So you're saying that men are more respected for being "studs" because it's harder for them to get laid. Fair enough, but that does not explain why women are actively disrespected for being sluts. In literally everything else, something is not considered "bad" just because it's easy. It would be neutral at worst. Let's say I host a dinner party at my house and decide to make zuppa tuscana with nothing but a microwave. Sure, it was easy. Does that make it bad? No. Why is it that, when we are desc…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 09:04 AM
17	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. But the term "creep" has nothing to do with the number of sexual partners a male has. It is not applicable. The "slut vs. stud" is applicable because a slut is a woman who has lots of sex, while a stud is a man who has lots of sex. I'm not talking about the entirety of female and male sexuality; only partner count, and the reasons behind people's negative reactions to female prommiscuity vs. positive reactions to male promiscuity. When you ask people why they have those reactions, some of them w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 08:47 AM
18	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. The only purpose of this post was to prove that men also face consequences for having a high number of sexual partners before marriage. That's it. That's all. Do what you will with this information.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 08:44 AM
2	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. "The analogy itself doesn't need a justification... it's just a way to explain society's behavior in a nice way." I'm only here to let people know that men also face consequences for slootin' it up. I'm sick of people saying that women are "damaged" by having lots of sex partners while men come out pure as the driven snow. It's just not true. And now you have proof. Use it how you like. If it changes someone's mind, great. If not, oh well. It's true, even historically speaking and cross-cultural…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 08:40 AM
7	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. Not true. Any man can be a stud. It all depends on your standards. I'll just leave this here: "the average person who is willing to lower their standards to absolutely nothing, and/or purchase sex work, will always be able to get sex. the reason you think women get sex easier is because you expect women to lower their standards while thinking a man shouldn't have to." Source This article cites a very well-known study which found that, while 75% of men answered "Yes" when asked by a woman, "I hav…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 08:32 AM
17	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. But it's not just "more" respect; rather, women are disrespected. Hence the oft-used "slut vs. stud": slut=bad, stud=good. Not slut=neutral, stud=good. In any case, this post's only purpose is to disprove TRP's claim that men are unaffected by having lots of sex partners while women are affected.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 08:26 AM
13	Male promiscuity and infidelity: Turns out, male sluts are just as bad. And right below that, it says: "On the other hand... Experts say that most often, men and women have different reasons for being unfaithful. Men search for more sex or attention, and women look to fill an emotional void." I'll have to do some separate research. Seems the info on men's motivation for cheating is conflicting. I'll get back to you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/03/16 07:46 AM
12	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Ahhh, I see. Sorry, I misinterpreted you. Yes, you are right, but the difference is that TRP goes out of its way to categorize "good" men and "bad" men. It leaves room for improvement when it comes to men; it says, "Right now, you're nothing but a beta-bux, but with enough hard work, you can be an alpha-fux!" TRP has disdain for betas, but it allows that they may one day become alphas. There is nothing inherently wrong with a weak man because he may one day become strong. He can change. Not so w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/02/16 12:04 AM
6	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Because those observations are not actually correct. There is no literature anywhere which proves that women are "illogical" compared to men. You don't have to hate women to be a misogynist, you just have to make a bunch of negative claims about them which have no basis in reality. Making negative (or even positive) claims about a group of people, while citing their race, sex, religion, etc. as the reason they possess these negative traits is the definition of prejudice.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:57 PM
10	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? The highest-upvoted comment, with 333 upvotes, called women "grotesque spectacles". In any case, you're grasping at straws. The point is that all of the comments make claims about women which are "negative" in nature. I'll change my wording if it suits you better; none of the comments need to imply "hate", they need only imply that women are somehow "bad". I think we can all agree that "ugly" or "distorted" is objectively "bad". Comments like the ones I showed you all paint women in a bad light.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:53 PM
5	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? What you're saying would not be considered misogynistic because it's actually true. To be misogynist, you have to have prejudices. And a prejudice is, by definition, not based on facts, evidence or research.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:50 PM
3	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? "If that behavior was sexually attractive, TRP would say it. Thing is, it isn't." So TRP doesn't find generosity or charity sexually attractive, which is why they don't seek out women who have those traits. So by your logic, TRP is sexually attracted to hypergamy? And that's why they only mention hypergamous women? Is TRP also sexually attracted to dishonorable women? Is that why they often call women dishonorable?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:49 PM
1	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? I don't think you're a misogynist unless you are prejudiced towards women. You don't seem all that prejudiced to be honest, except in your first comment. Just out of curiosity, in what ways do you believe women are "less" than men?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:45 PM
6	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Right, but what about it is "natural"? Couldn't TRP get its message across without pumping out an unnaturally large number of misogynists?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:40 PM
11	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? You don't think saying women are "grotesque" is in the least bit hateful....? Really? I don't believe you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:38 PM
6	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Going back to what the "other" side thinks is not constructive to debate, especially when it has nothing to do with what I said. I never said anything bad about "weak" men. I really don't want this discussion to devolve into another, "BUT FEMINISTS DO THE SAME THING!!!!!"	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:37 PM
5	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? "You are just trying to give it a spin to fit your puny narrative." I literally typed "define misogyny" into Google and copy/pasted the answer. I don't know what else to say to you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:33 PM
0	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? I don't know if you've read any of my comments, but I'll go ahead and say it again: As they say, the devil is in the details. I agree with you in that there is nothing wrong with saying that men and women are different. Of course they're different. We're literally wired differently. There is tons of research available on the subject. However, the misogyny happens when you say that they are "different" in ways that either a) apply to all humans or b) haven't been proven / aren't true. You could s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:28 PM
4	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Give me some examples of ways you treat women differently than you treat men.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:21 PM
7	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? "What's your point? Are people not entitled to opinions? Does the opinion of the few have to be correlated to being opinions of the rest." You just asked to point out hateful comments and I did. And my point is that comments like these are the reason so many RP folks are genuinely misogynistic. I am not saying that the community as a whole is misogynistic. I am trying to figure out why some of them are. And it's not just "Six people agreed with it." It's more people AGREED than DISAGREED. Rememb…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:19 PM
11	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? It's not "just an observation" when all you "observe" are bad things about women and good things about men. At that point it's just prejudice against women, AKA misogyny. Like, the exact definition of misogyny. "Women are more likely to be controlled by their emotions." I'm sorry, but I just don't see that. Women are much less likely than men to commit spur-of-the-moment, violent, emotionally-driven crimes. Assault, road rage, murder... mostly committed by angry men who let their emotions get th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:06 PM
4	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? I am confused by this sentence in your previous comment: "But I have to treat these women differently than I do the men in my life. A fact that I resent because it forces me to treat them like women above treating them like people." You resent treating "good" women well because it forces you to not hate them....?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 11:01 PM
2	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? In what ways do you believe men and women are different? I said in a previous comment, "The misogyny comes in when you try to describe the ways, exactly, in which they are different."	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 10:57 PM
10	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? I looked through TRP's Top Posts of all time and searched each page for comments that mention "women", "female", or "woman". Here are all the comments I found that are either hateful, or make claims that have no basis in reality that aim to decry women: 6 upvotes: "Women: None of them are loyal, so forget about commitment. Just spin plates and look out for #1. Abundance mentality and frame. Keep lifting and adding value." 17 upvotes: "A woman is much more likely to curl into a ball or complain a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 10:48 PM
5	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Tell me your story. You say, "That respect was not reciprocated." What happened to you that gave you this ingrained prejudice?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 10:28 PM
9	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? Misogyny: "dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women." Prejudice: "preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience." So, you see, you do not have to hate or even dislike women in order to be a misogynist. You just have to believe that they are somehow "worse" than men without any evidence. "Just because I acknowledge that women are weaker in many aspects does not mean I hate them for it." No, but it does mean you're a misogynist. I don't particularly ca…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 10:20 PM
6	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? "It's how any man with a strong personality has to behave. Otherwise, I risk being thought of as a flirt. And I avoid women for this reason." TIL men with "strong personalities" are frightened by people thinking they are flirts, and therefore avoid 50% of the population. Right then...	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 10:17 PM
11	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? How do you think women feel when they grow up thinking men are all Prince Charmings (like in Disney movies) only to discover that a lot of them are really.... well... more like you...?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 09:52 PM
18	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? "Men and women are inherently different." The misogyny comes in when people try to describe, in exact terms, the ways in which they are different. Things like, "Women are dishonorable, while men are honorable." "Women are illogical, while men are rational." TRP never ascribes positive attributes to women; only to men. THAT is misogyny.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 09:49 PM
16	If TRP isn't misogynistic, why are there a disproportionately large number of actual misogynists in their community? I see you're being sarcastic, but at the same time the question is just as valid. You might theorize, for example, that NASCAR fans are more likely to be racist because NASCAR has a larger presence in the south, where racism is more prevalent. It's not like these questions do not have answers. I am not implying that TRP is, in fact, misogynistic. I am only wondering why, exactly, misogyny is more common in that community compared to others. With NASCAR, it's probably because they're based in the…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 09:25 PM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. See, you just keep insisting that I will eventually get frustrated by a lack of "results". Like it's inevitable (even though there have been very few "results" in the years we've been together). But to be perfectly honest with you, my husband has been an indie-game developer since I met him. All I want to do is support him in his dream. The amount of money he has actually earned for the countless hours he has invested in this is... well, not so much. A good husband married to a SAHM does not bec…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 09:17 PM
1	Is it possible to say something negative about women without being misogynist? "TRP has no reason to pay enough attention to men to know which are which." Yep. And that's exactly why so many people who visit TRP come out sexist.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 08:50 PM
1	Is it possible to say something negative about women without being misogynist? Yes, exactly. Which is why I don't agree with those aspects of feminism. I do hate it when I'm sitting in the back seat with two other people and one of them decides to spread their legs wide enough to fit the Grand Canyon, though :P I think "manspreading" came around because men are just more likely to do that given their genitals. But it's rude no matter who does it. I have boobs, but that doesn't mean I'm going to drape my arms across the seat on both sides.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 08:49 PM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. Alright, I'll ask again: Why/why not? WHY do you hold these beliefs? Have you ever even thought about it...? I'll start by telling you why I disagree with you: I have no reason to believe that there's some "special" kind of love that only men are capable of feeling. When I think about how much I love my father, my sister, and my husband, I find it very hard to believe that there's something about having a Y-chromosome that would somehow make me capable of loving them more. I would do anything fo…	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/02/16 08:34 PM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. You didn't answer my question. "Why/Why not?" You'll excuse me if I don't take your opinion seriously until you explain to me why you hold it. How are men able to love that way, while women can't? What experiences/evidence are you basing that off?	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/02/16 07:50 PM
2	Is it possible to say something negative about women without being misogynist? "If you start saying why don't people talk about black on black crime in a BLM protest, you will be asked to leave? Why? because it's off topic and not towards the groups goals." Yes, I agree with you there. I understand the need to focus on group goals. However, it does nothing to forward your cause when you take negative attributes that apply to humans in general and imply that they are exclusive to women. A BLM protest exists because it is absolutely true that Black people suffer institutiona…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/02/16 07:46 PM
5	Is it possible to say something negative about women without being misogynist? I'm just pointing out why other people think TRP is so sexist. "We're not trying to date men, so we don't talk about men." I think most RP's would agree that both men and women lie about N-count. BUT... people hate TRP because they consistently, consciously, methodically choose to talk about "women" and not "people". You don't have to talk about "men" instead of "women". You just have to talk about "people". Let's say I believe that people, just in general, are hypocrites. Let's say I believe th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/02/16 07:36 PM
17	Is it possible to say something negative about women without being misogynist? I think most people who are labeled "misogynists", including TRP, are making the same mistake over and over again. They take a negative characteristic which applies to the entire human race, women and men, and word it so that it will be interpreted as though the negative trait is more common among women than among men, or even exclusive to women (AWALT). They almost never supply any evidence that the negative trait is more common among women than men, other than personal experience; pretty much …	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/02/16 07:07 PM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. "What happens when he thinks he is doing his best and you think he's being fucking worthless?" I don't know. That has never happened before. He's not an idiot. He knows when he's not doing his best. "Always does his best" is a personality characteristic. It may be be arbitrary / subjective, but we happen to agree on this 100% of the time (so far). We don't fight about this. Like I said, he's not retarded. If he doesn't follow-up with a potential employer, and I approach him about it, he's not go…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/02/16 07:30 PM
2	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. My own husband hasn't worked in a year, but dammit he has been trying so hard. In that way, I love him for who he is. I don't care if he doesn't have a job, so long as he is the type of man who wants to contribute to our shared home and always do his best in that capacity. He has done his best. No luck so far, but I love who he is, not what he does. The fact that he doesn't have a job does not matter. What matters is that he is trying his best. If we fight on this particular issue, it is only wh…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/16 05:22 AM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. Do you believe that women are incapable of loving a man in that way? Do you believe that men are, conversely, capable of this? Why/why not?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/16 05:18 AM
2	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. Let me give you a few personal examples: My brother was addicted to meth for about a year. He and his wife have two young children. I babysat their children during the summer when he was just starting to get hooked. I remember he had these scabs on his arms, and he swore up and down that some kind of parasite had crawled under his skin and was laying eggs there; absolutely insisted that it wasn't drugs. He and his wife went to 4 different doctors, looking for one that could help him treat the "p…	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/16 05:16 AM
1	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. Yes, "unnecessarily gendered" really hits the nail on the head.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/02/16 04:55 AM
16	Confused regarding "Women In Love" on the RP's sidebar. Interesting. I understand the desire to have that kind of love, but why does the author believe that only men are capable of it? I feel like that's pretty... ignorant. Like you'd have to willfully ignore the experiences of everyone else in order to make that claim. I don't have to go beyond my own circle to know that lots of women stay with their husbands through depression, unemployment, mental illness, physical disablities, etc...	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/16 02:01 AM
6	CMV: Nice guys aren't rejected because they are nice to get sex, they are rejected because they use niceness instead of being confident. I know this is supposed to be a CMV, but I agree with you. I don't think Nice Guys are rejected per-se, I think it's more like their whole game-plan relies on being SO FUCKING NICE that the woman just has to eventually throw herself at him in total awe of his niceness. Lots of Nice Guys simply don't have the confidence to approach a woman, so they just kinda dance around her and hope that she'll eventually reach out. The problem with this strategy is that women want to be approached. It's sexy w…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/02/16 01:46 AM
1	Considering The 80/20 Rule Both men AND women are lying. Men skew upwards. Women skew downwards.	/r/TheRedPill	31/03/15 06:27 AM
1	Considering The 80/20 Rule I'm interested. Let me know.	/r/TheRedPill	01/02/15 03:14 AM