TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ohforfs Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by Ohforfs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

Edit/OP is Chinese person who is deeply invested in US-PRC rivalry. They don't actually care about men, or Ukrainians - they perceive Russo-Ukrainian war through these Chinese geopolitical interests and propaganda competition lens. Now, I'm well aware that Russia is not the most popular country on English-speaking Reddit. Yeah I wonder why. The support for the war was never as great in Ukraine as has been portrayed in US/Western media. And what support there was, has pretty much dried up. Actual…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 08:29 AM
17

People just disagree with you. You come here all confident in your viewpoint, presenting it as fact. Okay. But consider that many disagree with you. And it's not some new discussion for most. So if you want the answer to the question, people just disagree with most of what you wrote, while they have generally left wing identity. No contradiction. That's your answer. Why they disagree is long topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 01:14 AM
2

I got banned and creep-shamed for sharing my vision that polyamory can be the solution to loneliness and sexlessness. Without reading, but taking into account the subreddit we're in, you got told that it's sexist, nobody is owed relationships and sex, and men in particular and it's disgusting and problematic 😆 After checking it, we'll, I wasn't really off the mark... But I'm surprised you didn't like peppermint article. I mean, I read it decades ago and it was good, it's not part of the new norm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 04:20 PM
7

It was long time ago so I don't remember the topic at all, but It was argument on some typical "here's my situation, what to do/think". I remember going against the consensus and especially one gal got really angry. Probably reported and I got banned for being uncivil or something like that (I wasn't, but don't have the thread). OTOH, polyamory is full of new norms which I think is funny in a horrible way since the whole idea was anti normative. And of course it's typically Reddit so people are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 04:17 PM
10

Getting banned from polyamory? I'm curious, I got banned there too. I don't trust OP, though, hiding their comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 02:10 PM
2

I am actually very close to the idea of anarchism (but too into pragmatism to call myself that). But: 1) You can't defend without obligatory service. Yeah, it's oppression, but the alternative is even more oppression. 2) As I said above, even at peace, I prefer to have something else than the actual alternative of fully professional military. Citizen one at least don't disproportionately draw authoritarian militarist types. And ultimately, power flows from the barrel of a gun. The compromise I'm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 05:56 PM
11

Unfortunately it only takes one to make war. It's just not very realistic. I prefer to have conscription than professional militaries and civilians, and I don't see any other options (and it might get even worse if we get autonomous drones)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 01:28 AM
28

Well go to Russia and convince it to adopt your stance first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 01:16 AM
39

Tried to find demographic split but gave up after seeing the percentage. Well at least they want it that way. Switzerland is peculiar, last location to have women right to vote was in year 1990.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 01:16 AM
118

85% voted against, btw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 01:09 AM
1

That too, but before that at clarisse thorn blog. Or simultaneously? Not sure anymore. Oh it's you! I assumed it was OP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:41 PM
2

Well now I feel silly 😆 but more so, I shouldn't state such absolute opinions on people. Sigh. I've seen some critique but nothing I remembered, so nothing that convinced me. But it'd be hard. I was a part (mostly silent) of a rather small group that discussed NISVS back when it came out. It was very important discovery back then that convinced a few people that something is amiss, including very feminist people. And we talked about it and critiqued the methodology and findings, quite well, but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 06:19 PM
1

Oh, that's Hoff Somers? Interesting , I didn't know how she looks. And disappointing... She had some interesting thoughts some years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:59 PM
2

Did you watch it? I'm not critiquing here, I mean these days skimming is survival skill. But I mean, she's talking nonsense (asking why not use crime statistics instead of victim study) in a first minute or so... It's a very much stupid question in the sense anyone even remotely competent in sociology would answer why crime statistics are worse at capturing scale of a phenomenon. For Lara Stemple, okay, I'm not reading this because I already agree - from what I read before, what you wrote here a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:32 PM
10

In the video, the woman is lying liar or just an idiot. I tend to think the first. No one even remotely competent could make such basic mistakes in methodology critique. I saw the CDC questions, they were very good. The whole methodology was also excellent, the only problems were with summary. Not sure who Lara stemple is, but that video doesn't inspire confidence in your recommendation. (Edit/Lara Stemple seems actually good, following OP reply and looking into it)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 02:47 PM
3

No, my perfect 0/0 scores are honest! (Actually, I got 0.45 in one because I mistyped). Interesting are the international results. Checking, South Korea and Poland has gender equivalency in benevolent sexism, as only countries among the dozen or so I checked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 03:00 PM
3

It's interesting in the context of military where you have only a small part of men being very different in aggression in battle, basically indulging in it, which is well known both in history and among current professionals. On a side note, you made it sound like domestic abuse means physical violence necessarily in the initial part which I assume is unfortunate briefing and not really such claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/25 12:56 PM
2

You're right it doesn't and I also misunderstood one bit, that makes it more complex. I thought it was about victimization alone (so number of victims) which is indeed almost equal (precisely, equal at severe category and almost equal at less severe). But rereading it, the comment I replied to meant f-m vs m-f so both perpetration and victimization. Which the table doesn't quote. The research did ask for that, but it's mentioned in the text only not in the table. It's 99%/80% for the two severe …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 01:43 PM
1

How am I misrepresenting data?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 12:05 PM
-1

Incomplete in what way? You say 'considering it doesn't list statistics for men' (on the website - you mean the link not the whole CDC website?), but it lists them for men? I just quoted them above? If you mean men entry under 'rape' (and, incidentally, women under 'made to penetrate') these aren't listed there because the number was too low for statistical significance. Not sure if it's written somewhere on that page, I remember it from reading it back then. It's NISVS 2011, so it only concerns…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 11:47 AM
-4

I said check the last 12 month prevalence for a reason - these are more reliable than lifetime data, for variety of reasons (which is rather uncontroversial in statistics). Tangentially, even if they were not, last 12 months would paint more contemporary picture while lifetime historical one. Please calm down. I read it years ago, quite extensively, and it'd benefit you too if you did approach it with curiosity not hostility. I mean, sure, the summary paints a different picture, but that's a sum…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:50 AM
-3

Rape, last 12 months, women - 1929000 Made to penetrate (so the male equivalent), last 12 months - 1921000 The other sexual violence isn't far off from parity, 6,6m Vs 5,6m
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:43 AM
-8

NO THE FUCK ITS NOT I would think NISVS findings are more commonly known. Yes, it's equal. You can look yourself, it's fairly easy to check. (Table 1, check last year as lifetime is less reliable indicator). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm It was also replicated in subsequent surveys and there's quite a bit of smaller but more qualitative research. I know it's shocking and surprising I didn't believe it for months when I learned about it. Pinging your interlocutor too u/Do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 10:27 AM
1

That's interesting. Because only part of it supports that conclusion (the time around part), and only potentially. I mean, the trope is that the father comes home and beats up the wife or children because work or drunk, not exactly because he can't stand them. That's why the time spent would only partly support it. Of course it'd be more complex but I doubt the argument is about much nuance or complexity. More interesting is that the stress argument. I suppose it's meant to be the counterpart ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 11:32 PM
1

That's an argument? It looks like a statement of fact+interpretation of causes. What does it argue for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 12:13 AM
12

Lol 😆 That all it deserves. But let me have fun with this reactionary backlash: The majority of male perpetrated violence, particularly against females, is gender-based; regardless of the gender of the victim, male perpetrated sexual violence has been linked to gender norms that promote male dominance and control, as demonstrated by a recently published multi-country study on rape perpetration.4 We have seen this as a significant finding across every study on the topic, and this has arisen from …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/24 03:57 AM
6

Thanks for explaining your position. I understand, though I disagree, as I find it professionally practically flawless (and that includes superiority of 12 month data) But you surely know all this and I'm happy I was mistaken in thinking you didn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 06:53 PM
13

So rape is probably something men do a lot more to women than the reverse. It likely isn't, I thought NISVS findings were common knowledge here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:58 PM
3

As for your second bit, I’m new to this & don’t know all the terminology sorry. But I’ve pretty much only ever encountered men’s rights being discussed in a heavily reactionary way which is not something I’m interested in. There is a lot of different circles you'll be likely happier to encounter (though their criticism is much harder to reject that Tate silliness). Let me drop a link to feministcritics: https://www.feministcritics.org/blog/ Also Femradebates subreddit had a lot of good stuff in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:55 PM
2

He is a Tate bro who believes the solution to men’s problems is returning to traditional gender roles, that women should be submissive, that LGBT people should be shunned & that women should remain virgins until marriage First thing you need to understand is that not only feminism is internally diverse, but 'mra' too. In particular, people here are unlikely to have much in common with 'tate follower', and won't share his specific views you listed, in fact most would be very much opposed to them …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:50 PM
2

I would not be surprised if it made it harder to accept aging if it starts only after 2+ decades. You get used to young looks. At least i did, being in pretty much the same boat as you.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/24 01:10 PM
1

Well, you may be right here. I'll devote some time to educate myself on this issue. Do you have any interesting sources, articles or surveys? Do you mean f>m sexual violence or specifically child support in such cases?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/24 07:03 AM
1

I'm from Poland too, and, well, orphanages suck, really badly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/24 06:47 AM
2

Not sure what you exactly mean by that. None of these dispute violence as a control tool, they dispute gendered quality of it.
/r/Male_Studies11/06/23 05:02 PM
2

In somewhat related news: https://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/14870440 (Older men with no sexual interest in women at risk of earlier death)
/r/Male_Studies03/05/23 11:03 AM
3

That's quite interesting question. Perhaps there is some research done on that? What are your and people you know thoughts on that? Mine would be making a goals document that would make it clear and serve as a basis for what is the purpose of org and thus what falls outside of it (but that's just immediate thought...)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 02:20 PM
1

I was always curiois about, say, gini index of this. Do you have any stats?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/22 01:17 PM
1

It's not for "you". Since you are bi, you can be in relationship with woman, and you can be victim of f-m DV. So, "you" in here means you, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 11:37 AM
1

One done in Poland comes to mind. Hey, do you have anything specific on your mind? I'm Polish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/19 08:24 PM
1

It'll be tough to tell physiologically who enjoys it more. Perhaps a non-invasive brain scan where sex is measured relative to other sensory experiences, but the technology being non-invasive enough isn't here yet. Afaik, physiologically there are basically no differences in orgasm. Although i would think our minds influence how much pleasure we derive from it (and from the activities preceeding it)
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter