TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Oilywilly Archive

View 1 post and 32 comments by Oilywilly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oilywilly/r/TheRedPill28/06/18 05:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Your comment is the 8th top comment and the first to address the study and topic directly rather than dance around the topic, saying all studies are biased/general feminism statements. This is the first comment that is a real critique and adds to the discussion around the topic. The rest are just men complaining
/r/MensRights27/12/24 01:07 PM
1

So who is funding this particular study, and is it a false conclusion that women perform the majority of childcare/household emotional labour?
/r/MensRights27/12/24 01:04 PM
1

Respect to you just for surface reading at all. The doctoral level thesis explores how female perpetrators of these types of crimes are likely undercounted. 1 in 9 offenders being female is 11% female, which appears to be bang on with the statistics in some of my sources there (87% male perpetrators). Even though those numbers repprted by BBC are big numbers and it's good to tackle all sources for these crimes.... A reasonable inference would be that male perpetuated child abuse numbers are appr…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 11:00 AM
1

Sure. Even before doing literature review searches for "teacher sexual misconduct prevalence" by country, I guessed that most perpetrators are men and most victims are female. I'll post links to studies for Canada/USA/ and UK including a doctoral level thesis analysis on the topic including female perpetrator analysis which MRA enthusiasts might find ammunition for future posts there if they focus and read something. There's a lot of interesting learning on these papers besides just the gendered…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 03:38 AM
0

They all show one female predator. The same women above. I did the same thing you did and they all show Rebecca Joynes for the first couple pages of search results. We'll need to use some other metric to find out how common it is, and which gender of predator is more likely. Perhaps statistics? I bet we wouldn't like those on this subreddit though....
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:35 AM
-10

Because this subreddit is scouring the whole world for these stories lol. If we were to look for only male teacher abusing female student stories and open up the search to all English international media, do you think we would find more male predators or more female predators?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 04:11 PM
-32

Now where are all the hundreds of news articles this year of men doing this? Not on this subreddit that's for sure.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:04 PM
2

What is the "real man" ideal that you are not interested in? Is it a real societal expectation? Or is something else?
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:03 AM
1

It's not really the type of study that can "prove" causation. You can't actually control all variables either. Not for a question like this. You hit the nail on the head talking about inherent disease states to women like prevalence of autoimmune disorders. When designing your study, you choose to select for certain advantages and it's ok to come to certain conclusions without evidence as strong as the evidence for cancer and smoking. The evidence for women patients having poorer pain control ou…
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:32 AM
1

Hey thanks for responding. I appreciate it and this makes more sense. It's a very unique lens you have. Lots of laypeople try their best to "follow the studies" or "critically analyze the literature" but I'd arrogantly claim the average number of studies these people have read to be something like 0.1 study per person with analysis not even worth mentioning. It's clear you've read dozens of even hundreds start to finish with a genuine effort and motivation to understand and critically analyze wh…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:44 PM
1

Really interesting write up. Very clearly written and we can follow your thought process. I'm curious what your professional background is - clearly not academic or clinical medicine, probably not any of the pure scientific disciplines either, but it's also clear that you've read a lot of studies and analyzed them in your own way. Some sort of arts degree seems unlikely to me too and definitely not philosophy or English language. There's some clear critical thinking here but it seems to be with …
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:41 PM
1

I administer anesthesia for a living. With 500 thousand dollar machines. Even if some medical students somehow were left unsupervised long enough to sneak out a bottle of the anesthetic gas, how would they vaporize it and administer it to you? How would even the best medical student know how to do it safely without killing you, and how would they readminister it to you constantly in order to make you anesthetized for 20 hours rather than a couple minutes which is all one bottle would last for a …
/r/MensRights07/02/24 10:08 PM
10

By all means investigate your suspicions and take precautions....But you should be aware that based on the "evidence" and situation with the details you've provided above....there is a 99% chance that you're not being drugged by the people in the house. It's very difficult to get ahold of any kind of inhaled anesthetic that would work on you while asleep. Tens of millions of Americans have had periods of extreme fatigue due to hormonal imbalances, sleep apnea, anemia, vitamin deficiency, trauma,…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 03:48 PM
1

She hallucinated, most likely after the surgery entirely which is common with some anesthetics - most famously ketamine which should not be used in a dental clinic. There must be a little bit more credibility to her accusation since no dental assistant should ever be alone with someone under anesthetic and this story can easily be corroborated or witnessed as false. There is potential in recovery while waking up but no blind accusation that doesn't make sense would ever make it this far. Edit: I…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:09 PM
-2

My only concern is the fact you asked this question in this forum. Why ask here?
/r/MensRights20/01/24 05:08 PM
1

The sun article is the exact, exact word for word same article as the above. This is outlined in the blog I linked comparing and contrasting the varying news outlets' coverage of this topic.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 02:12 PM
-1

Heh good catch. It was indeed the UK police.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 02:08 PM
10

If you follow the link in the article it redirects to the RCMP release where they have multiple reported mild sexual assaults on the same path with the suspect's description matching him. There's also a line in the Sun article (I think) supposedly quoting the court where they reference these previous attacks as context for the 17 year old's extreme response and why she reported it to the police immediately after the first time he touched her on that path even before the second time. If you know …
/r/MensRights16/01/24 12:28 PM
18

https://asdaddy.com/2019/10/25/fake-news-how-much-can-you-trust/ If it seems there is something missing from the story, maybe there is?
/r/MensRights16/01/24 09:47 AM
1

The jury did not believe her, thankfully. Because they saw the same video that showed him running away and doing everything right. “It is clear that the jury did not believe Grace Jabbari’s story of what happened in the SUV because they found that Mr. Majors did not intentionally cause any injuries to her,” However, he did get charged for his other acts of violence against her. Here's a summary of the evidence for his other charges. https://www.thecut.com/article/everything-we-know-about-jonatha…
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:23 PM
1

Seems like every country is the worst for misandry. Hmm. Hmm.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:03 AM
-3

The young men here are not clinicians and they are definitely not scientists who have the ability for literature review. There's also an enormous amount of feelings being thrown around here and a strange collective guilt when considering that perhaps men perform bad behaviours on a societal level. It's a perfectly fine, decade old study with a perfectly fine sample size and spread among several institutions. The author's name their biases and sources for error. The paragraph about possible expla…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 10:09 PM
6

"I know I was wrong about the study this time but look in my history for my story about my wife and I" I'm sure your story is illuminating and an experience everyone' can learn something from, but it's irrelevant to the thread, original question and the follow up question by the OP.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 09:51 PM
2

It also showed how important representation of your gender in politics and media is individually empowering in a non toxic way. Ken was exposed to this representation and was influenced to stand up for himself and think about his needs etc.... It wasn't a misandric movie in any way. It showed how important it is for women and young girls to have representation in politics/media without insulting men.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:31 PM
3

You are aware humanities were taught at your college and science courses are still being taught today right? CRT has been around in higher level academic courses for decades as well.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:06 PM
6

Is it "bad decision-making skills" for those women that choose flexible career options? It sounds like you are in full support of programs that engage young women in STEM fields.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:05 PM
2

By independent thought, do you believe reviewers should be allowed to express their opinions while commenting on movies?
/r/MGTOW28/03/21 02:53 AM
6

You are not damaged beyond repair. You're a young man with a lot of life ahead of you. You are likely going to change your beliefs half a dozen times in your life as you grow, learn and adapt, as we all dp. Your mother and sister do not represent all women. They might not even represent women in your small town or city. You also have no real definitive knowledge about what it is like for "women back in the day" because A) you don't really know what it's like for women today and B) we're all gues…
/r/MGTOW21/02/21 03:33 AM
3

What a waste of an impressive imagination
/r/MGTOW19/02/21 01:00 PM
1

By "everyone" you mean two people on twitter who likely got a tonne of hate for their stupid comments
/r/MensRights14/10/20 03:00 PM
3

I'm agreeing with you. Great job linking the CPA policy half a dozen times. The policy appears evidence based, although circumcision stats are far from horrible. They just aren't that bad. A problem for sure, absolutely, but not some scientific conspiracy differing immensely from your country's AAP. The circumcision rate in Canada is still approximately 30% even with it not being evidence based practice, not that much better than the USA. If Canadian parents elect for the procedure...guess what …
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:58 PM
5

Great that this issue is getting looked at, but don't pretend the AAP is still advocating for circumcision...and somehow the scientific literature being "hijacked by a small group of people" is a relevant issue in modern scientific literature. That's just not how meta-analyses work. A small group of researchers can't hijack thousands of literature reviews from dozens of countries. That ethicist blog is ignorant of the scientific process. Your country's largest pediatric medical society (AAP) has…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 02:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter