TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Afternoon_1494 Archive

View 3 posts and 90 comments by Ok_Afternoon_1494 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I agree with this too. Another one for me is when we (as guys, or other girls I guess) call a girl a "bi*ch", I am starting to see it more as meaning "a narcissistic woman", typically grandiose narcissism in my experience.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:23 AM
1

If the genders were reversed, that behavior would be labeled misogynistic, removed, and banned to protect women's rights and mental health. The same should go for men.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:34 PM
1

I see your account is deleted soon after commenting, but for shits and giggles, I'm going to respond anyways: When or how did I ever say "men leading in most career fields is an excuse to make women look inferior and that you should be forced back into nothing your gender's traditional roles and have your rights taken away" ?? It was the other guy that tried using "men leading in most career fields" as an excuse for bad behavior OF WOMEN. So how about this instead maybe: I'm sorry, but when "men…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 04:52 PM
3

Women’s emotional wellbeing is still prioritized over men’s. “Ladies first” still rings social truth even in modern times. It is a product of gynocentrism, the thing that grew alongside patriarchy, except that feminists only want to get rid of patriarchy, they don’t want to get rid of gynocentrism. In fact, I don’t even think most of them are aware of gynocentrism, and how it negatively neglects men. Social change for this is going to be slow.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:07 AM
2

You really think your sample size from a college frat is reflective of all men or "a lot of men"? Open up your world view dude.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 09:01 PM
3

So why come here and say “R/whoosh It’s almost as if jokes exist” if you are not condoning/excusing it? Or are you retracting what you said before? You lack consistency
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:43 PM
3

You saying “maybe they enjoy edgy humor?” is still condoning it, the very least excusing it. Don’t be so ignorant
/r/MensRights13/07/25 05:31 PM
3

The fact you are condoning this type of behavior is concerning. Glad you can at least understand it is not "right", but I don't think it is understandable simply because of historical events. It's not healthy for anyone, plain and simple. I'm happy women are excelling in their fields of interest. Cudos to them. But using it as an opportunity to tear men down and "pray for their downfall" is not only immature, but deeply disturbing. And yeah, people are tired of it. Heck, some people are hurt by …
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:11 PM
3

Tearing down men isn’t how you do that. Their type of content far surpasses “so happy to have opportunities in society, yay!”. These girls are insecure, and are targeting men to try and make up for it. It’s not healthy for either gender. They need to take their issues to a therapist, not tear down others on social media. And if you seriously agree and enjoy posts like theirs then you are part of the problem. I’d recommend you see a therapist too.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 11:08 AM
1

Unfortunately, no. I wasn’t fully in a place at that time to recognize it as abuse still. But I wish I had. Luckily for us, she took her practice elsewhere. She was not on the platform when I logged back in one day.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 01:51 AM
2

Yes, it has been very difficult to even recover from the trauma because therapists are not likely to acknowledge the abuse very well, or sometimes even at all. Even worse, a female therapist once verbally abused me herself (called me a baby)... further reinforcing the abuse and retraumatizing me. She was from the "BetterHelp" page as well. Really sad to see. Because of this, I have been living with the effects of verbal abuse for over 6 years. EMDR with a male psychologist who understands it is …
/r/MensRights26/06/25 11:03 PM
1

Did your eyes glaze over m y message? I said "Take a screenshot of your post and DM it to me then", not "Send me a screenshot of where it (directly) says that". (Though that would be nice if you just did) Reason being that I can no longer see your post because mods took it down. I'm not trying to antagonize you, but I am trying to get to the bottom of it all.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:37 PM
1

Take a screenshot of your post and DM it to me then
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:04 PM
1

You did in your own post man. Don't be so ignorant of yourself, lol.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 07:49 PM
3

He has tried stating in his post and in other arguments that paper abortions would affect other people, but women's abortion doesn't or don't. You countered his argument and maybe didn't know it xD
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:40 AM
3

You have stated in your post and in other arguments that abortion doesn't affect anyone else, but paper abortions would. She just gave you an example of how that premise is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:34 AM
4

I'm not going to agree with your "distinction" because it would be wrong. If you don't get this, then this topic is over your head. Tbh, it's been over your head from the start. Liberalism for women, but not for men is your motto right now, so let me parse this out for you: Women would have the right to an abortion herself, she is not "saddled" with a kid just because the father paper aborted, she would have the option of an abortion too. I mean sure, she would be burdened with having to make th…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:31 AM
4

And honestly, it doesn't have to be a full parallel to be a right. If that was the case then: "Women get to abort, but men can't?? That is not a perfect parallel!!! WOMEN SHOULDNT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ABORTIONS IF MEN CAN"T!!!" Is that the parallel logic you are looking for?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:43 AM
4

There is a parallel, you just continue to not see it. Abortion comes with the right to opt out of parenthood, Men don't get that, but paper abortions would allow men the same right to opt out of parenthood as well. There are plenty of women who try and parent trap a man, or to "baby trap" as it has also been called. It is not fair to men, and they deserve a way out of these abusive predicaments. Edit: And if that still isn't enough for you to understand, then I'll break down why your analogy is …
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:38 AM
5

Just because it is not perfectly “parallel” doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be a right. And if you are looking for the parallel of it, then look at the fact that abortion ultimately allows for women to opt out of being a parent if she so chooses. We don’t have the same for men though. They have no choice if the woman wants to keep and he doesn’t. The furthest he can opt out still requires 20% of his paycheck for the next 18 years. Men should be able to opt out too, simple as that.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:32 PM
139

And the funny part is, they ARE getting criminal records… the amount of female teachers getting caught or exposed for sexual misconduct is growing rapidly. Edit: Also wouldn’t be surprised to see the doctors doing it too. Had a female neurologist try and flirt by fantasizing about meeting me at a grocery store… “Do you go to the grocery store a lot? I wanna meet you at the grocery store :)” It kinda felt like she was trying to compensate for being a bad neurologist tbh
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:46 AM
158

They still sound insecure, I wouldn’t let it get to ya. If they were truly confident in who they were, then they wouldn’t feel the need to flaunt it; aka they are still empty inside.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:29 AM
1

I think what gets ignored the most is the pressure that comes from women towards men (maybe not all of them, but a lot) to conform to traditional norms around “being a man”. As an example, I experienced my first girlfriend break up with me by telling me that I wasn’t man enough for her. These kinds of statements and gender expectations are inherently toxic imo, and I think they perpetuate toxic male gender norms, the same ones that feminists (and I’d say most women in general) are striving to fi…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 08:52 PM
10

I know, thanks 👍
/r/MensRights14/06/25 10:58 AM
12

Not what I said at all. I’m not a misogynist like you. Interesting you think that way though.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 10:40 AM
5

Mmm, I don’t think men truly have a choice. Men are widely still expected to pay for first dates if they want to be in a relationship. And here is what Google has to say “Yes, expecting money from someone without anything in return can be a form of financial abuse”
/r/MensRights14/06/25 10:36 AM
11

lol, glad you are amused. Must have struck a cord if it made you laugh.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:51 AM
3

Sexless grayed aliens though
/r/MensRights14/06/25 08:42 AM
4

I agree, and I think it potentially may be doing more harm than good too. With how much "progressivism" is influencing the west, we are basically on our way to becoming a sexless grayed alien species where everyone looks and functions the same. That might be the only time that true equality is reached, and I am not wanting, nor looking forward to, it.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:56 AM
3

Very true, yeah.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:42 AM
1

You gonna do that too?
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:32 AM
3

Tbh, idk. Makes me wonder if any relationship would exist at all if full and true equality was actually reached, or if full independence was reached. Like two people just standing across from each other, no interactions either... would be really weird.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 07:03 AM
2

Another thing. This type of relationship can induce mental illnesses like CPTSD into their victims. The destruction of self-esteem and rumination after the abuse can lead victims to accept other bad situations in their lives, and the prolonged abuse from all of this can lead our brains to develop mental illnesses like CPTSD in the long term.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 11:48 PM
3

Thank you for sharing this article, I'm pretty certain I was a victim of this myself. The idealization, devaluing, and discarding are all very real. It is not a normal breakup, this type of relationship/breakup will leave you broken in pieces. One of the hallmarks of this type of abuse is the attack on your manhood. One of the things she said to me was "You are just not man enough for me"
/r/MensRights22/03/25 11:34 PM
-5

That’s a pretty dumb argument. So I guess toxic femininity is not real either because it doesn’t poison the body… or does it? You ever heard of the woman who put poison in her man’s coffee and it slowly killed him over a few months period? Anyway, joke aside, I agree that it is mainly used incorrectly to insult and shame boys. Look, I don’t know what the definitions should be, I’m just saying that there is toxic masculinity, as well as toxic femininity. The definitions google/feminism provides a…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 07:01 PM
2

Yeah, it definitely sounds like she was incestually abusive towards you. This type of abuse can definitely leave a lasting impact. I personally developed a lot of codependent habits, and I’m pretty sure I attracted a narcissistic girlfriend in return. That relationship taught me a lot about myself, but it was very painful. I wouldn’t know if it personally influenced your sexual orientation or preferences, but I can speak a bit for myself. I believe that some of the things my mom did to me result…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:37 PM
-1

We all have masculine and feminine aspects within us, therefore, we all can potentially display the toxic feminine trait that you just shared.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:17 PM
3

Yep, I am a victim of an emotionally incestuous mother. Once I got my first gf, she was immediately turned off by the relationship I had with my mom, and then proceeded to verbally abuse me for it, and then ultimately left me. I was dealt with double abuse. I now refuse to talk to my mother ever again
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:03 PM
-2

I already said why… The toxicity will display differently depending on which one it is coming from.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 04:57 PM
-2

Doesn’t change the fact that both are real things
/r/MensRights16/03/25 02:03 PM
7

Hell yeah brother
/r/MensRights16/03/25 02:02 PM
-7

No, because toxicity will display differently depending on which one it is coming from, masculinity or femininity.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:38 AM
1

The toxic ones. Some of them are healthy, some of them are not, and it probably depends on the woman and the man involved. For example, (this is directly from my own experience) A woman may have a mother wound, maybe her own mother has said something to her that hurt her as a child, and she internalizes it, never gets help for it, etc. and then 20 years down the road, something within her man's relationship with his mom triggers her old wound/insecurity, and if she doesn't have a healthy way of …
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:13 AM
6

Thank you
/r/MensRights16/03/25 10:17 AM
10

Your comment is the only correct one. Thank you sir, and the people who upvoted it, for your understanding.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 02:50 AM
1

Oh, and for the funny part about my ex. I have finally realized she has been leaving subliminal messages to me on her Instagram for the last 3 years ever since she got into another relationship. It has been 5 years since we "broke" up... but I was so emotionally and psychologically injured by it that I found myself checking up on her Instagram account while in pain a lot. Over time, her posts had become more and more subliminal, like saying phrases that we used to come up with together, or doing…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:26 AM
1

No problem at all, and ty for the reply. Your story sounds so much like my own. I'm sorry you went through this too. I'm personally convinced that what we went through was narcissistic abuse/behavior. They lovebomb, and idealize you, then once we inevitably fail to meet up to their idealized image, they then begin to devalue, which is then followed by discarding. It is not normal, and their aim is to destroy their partner's self-esteem. They are definitely not healthy breakups at all, but seems …
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:25 AM
1

Hey, so I know this was posted awhile back, but I'm curious, is this how all of them have breaken up in your experience? I have only been in one serious relationship, and all the hurtful emotional attacks is what my ex did to me as well, so curious how common emotional abuse from them like this is. I'm pretty sure if the roles were reversed, women would be quick to call us narcissists lol
/r/MensRights15/02/25 10:22 AM
1

There are people who said women just look for stable average men for relationships and sense of secure , but they would bang other more “ attractive “men when they are in a stable relationship . I'm pretty sure this is why my mom ended up cheating on my father. Ended in divorce and lots of financial and emotional ruin within the family, but mainly for my father. Something she always told me was that she sought out my father for his stability and security, but she never mentioned much if she was …
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:24 AM
7

There is nothing wrong with women's rights, but there are things wrong with feminism. I think this is more or less what is trying to be said.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 04:37 AM
5

Yeah... feminism has some serious toxic elements that go unaddressed and is basically being dismissed in general by society at large. It is a problem that needs acknowledgement, so thank you for doing your part. I can still remember as a middle schooler when feminism was starting to really become mainstream, and I remember being on board with it, but I also remember thinking "Since it is equal rights between men and women... then why is it named feminism instead of something like humanism?" That…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 04:28 AM
4

I second this
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:23 PM
1

I heard that female only gyms usually go bankrupt, because ultimately they like the attention I guess, but at this point it just needs to be law that women use different gyms from men. We use different bathrooms, we should use different gyms too. Problems solved.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:21 PM
1

Nowhere in the study does it say that... are we reading the same study?https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/6/1007
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:02 AM
1

What is stopping us? Oh idk, maybe being considered a walking ick by the entire female gender. Do you really think they would be ok with us having friendships that are close like theirs are? https://www.instagram.com/p/C1nFWE6u5rx/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
/r/MensRights04/02/25 07:05 AM
1

5% difference of what? I'm not sure what you are referring to. And yeah, the dating world exists outside the US. I am in the US, so it applies to me, as well as about 43% of reddit users. I assume you are not from the US, so maybe don't have to take it so seriously. Also, interestingly enough, they mention that the women in the study said they were more likely to put the men into the friend zone... so based on your personal experience that you shared, maybe it does apply to your country too... "…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 06:51 AM
1

Maybe that is part of it, and I genuinely hope that is what it truly is, but that is not what was said by the women in the study. Also, I don't doubt that women would be fine being friends with cat owners, but in terms of dating, they are seen as less dateable. And the reasons they stated are below: "Most of the women found the men holding cats to be less dateable. This result surprised us, since previous studies had shown that women found men with pets to have higher potential as partners. They…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:37 AM
11

Yeah. It's already depressing just seeing these things, the next depressing part is seeing how people respond to anyone who points it out. Really rough out there. Best thing you can do is close out the app and remember that it is the internet. Voices on the internet are much louder than they would be in person.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 02:37 AM
5

Outside of this post, you make a good point. I can agree that what is being called shallow actually serves a larger purpose, which is biological in nature, and biological mechanisms are much more than the skin deep labels that are being put on them. But I think you are missing the whole point of this post. Men are negatively and harmfully generalized as the only ones having these things, even though the opposite sex has them too. That is the point. It is calling out the hypocrisy of it all. Edit…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 02:00 AM
4

I should probably add that I think the posts about "how do women want us to dress" is a little weird also. Like idk why we should be be caring about what women find sexy on men... such a weird attribute to give to men in the first place. Though I suppose there are things that women do find "sexy", but it's just weird. Edit: Actually, I take that back lol. Women do find certain things "sexy" on men, I just feel weird about it lol.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 12:01 AM
28

You are right in that it doesn't really have much to do with men's legal rights, but it rightfully contradicts the harmful generalizations that men have strictly faced in the mainstream narratives over the past few decades (particularly due to the feminist movement, must I say). "Men are shallow", "Men are visual creatures", etc, etc, when women are also visual creatures, and they can also be shallow as well, etc, etc. They are harmful generalizations at the end of the day, and men are finally p…
/r/MensRights02/02/25 11:35 PM
4

Tbh, I don't know lol. Any downvoters here that want to explain?
/r/MensRights02/02/25 10:46 PM
6

Yeah, but I’d personally be worried if a girl caught me opening up to a friend about something. Wouldn’t be surprised if it gives them the ick tbh.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:30 PM
3

Turns out, it’s not okay. https://theconversation.com/we-studied-what-happens-when-guys-add-their-cats-to-their-dating-app-profiles-144999
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:22 PM
6

Owning a cat is basically a death sentence in the dating world. Women don’t like seeing men with cats for one reason or another. Obviously, men can make friends, but in terms of finding a partner, owing a cat actually reduces their chances of finding someone. https://theconversation.com/we-studied-what-happens-when-guys-add-their-cats-to-their-dating-app-profiles-144999#:~:text=Most%20of%20the%20women%20found,more%20neurotic%2C%20agreeable%20and%20open.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:13 PM
8

That is rather interesting. Like she found a hint of the truth buried under all that dislike. Never would have expected that really. And also, Women being indirectly called a loser for not getting as much sexual attention from the opposite sex... that's an interesting dose of equality.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 07:06 AM
10

What is the solution for men that get baby trapped? He has to pay 20% of his income for 18 years or be forced into fatherhood with a woman that he will resent. Why can't he opt out?
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:32 AM
8

We are just saying that if women get the right to abort a baby under any circumstance (which is fully legal in 30 states as of right now), then men should also be able to opt out of parenthood under any circumstance (pre birth) if he so chooses (in those same states). Otherwise, even if a man didn't want to create the baby, he would still be forced by the court of law to pay 20% of his annual income for the next 18 years to a baby that he didn't want to create. Whereas if a woman didn't want to …
/r/MensRights01/02/25 03:32 AM
2

I personally think it is unfair as well. If women get the right to abort, then men should get the right to opt out, but that choice should only get to be made while the baby is in the womb. It would be unfair not to imo. Other than a mistake occurring, there are men who get intentionally baby trapped. Although it is relatively rare, I have heard of cases where it has occurred. In those situations, I definitely think he should get the option to opt out of parenthood if he so wants to. Problem is …
/r/MensRights01/02/25 02:15 AM
7

Yeah, “they sound awful”, was my first thought. Don’t let ‘em get to you. We here for you 🫡
/r/MensRights30/01/25 10:55 PM
3

If it makes you feel any better, I am in a similar boat. And it’s been 5 years for me, so a bit pathetic tbh, but I still think about her nonetheless. She was pretty brutal towards me during the ending stages of the breakup, so I think it left a deep mark on me. One of the things she told me was that I just wasn’t man enough for her. It hurt a lot, and found myself into the red pill space pretty quickly as I wanted to be “man enough”. It honestly just messed me up more, and I wish I didn’t go th…
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:57 AM
1

I 100% agree. Thanks for the read, very eye opening info. My 2 cents in it is that they want us to show our emotions so that they know when they should jump ship... it’s a complete backstab when men experience this for the first time. Really sucks.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 08:25 PM
18

Yo same! I had one openly tell me that too. Crazy how ignorant women can be towards their own kind lol. Like do they really not know? They gotta be lying to save the “sisterhood”
/r/MensRights28/01/25 02:28 PM
12

Yep, I can give you a direct example if you want. My mother cheated on my father. I was 9, and she gave me the whole speal of “well you see, my emotional needs were not being met. He always did xyz, and he made me feel this way, and made me feel that way, and didn’t do this, but always did that, and yadda yadda yadda.” It messed me up for a really long time. It was like she kept all this hidden from him the entire marriage, like it was all stuff that she expected that he knew, yet he didn’t know…
/r/MensRights28/01/25 02:20 PM
21

For what it is worth, I also think society wrongfully accepts women's cheating. If a woman cheats in a marriage, it is because her emotional needs were not being met (man's fault) but if a man cheats (which typically happens when his wife is no longer "putting out" so to speak) then it is still his fault, and if you try to say it is because his sexual needs were not being met, or that she wasn't putting out anymore, it is still dismissed because "it is not a woman's obligation to give a man sex …
/r/MensRights28/01/25 12:07 PM
36

You have no idea how many of them I encountered and said "But I never saw a woman do that!" thinking like they are the center of the Earth The amount of times I've seen this as well is staggering. I swear they will also twist the facts in their head, or flat out lie just to force things into their personal worldview. And the logic behind it makes my head spin. "I am a woman, I have not done that or seen that happen, therefore what anyone else says about it must be false" So narrow minded... Aggr…
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:17 AM
1

Mkay, I feel that you are getting very heated over this. You are right though, it definitely doesn't make me respect you as much anymore. Have a good day, and I hope that you work on your toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:34 AM
1

True but I'd argue that being able to garner respect from others is typically attractive to women, so men will behave in that way inherently to different degrees.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:11 AM
2

Very well said again. Can agree with it all. Ty again!
/r/MensRights27/01/25 02:52 AM
2

This is a really good take on the issue, thank you for sharing your insights. I can definitely agree on the term toxic gendered expectations. It easily encompasses everything that leads to the problems we are seeing in both men and women. And yes, unfortunately, most feminists will fight to the death before they ever have to admit or consider that women may be part of the problem. Which is really sad, because by them ignoring the part that women play, they are essentially taking away the most ac…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 12:57 AM
1

I'd be happy with being understanding of that, but I'd hope that they are able to acknowledge their part in it. They take away power from themselves by not acknowledging the part they play in the toxic puzzle, which just hurts them more in the end.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 09:22 PM
2

That is actually a really good point. There is definitely some definition missing it seems, or we could just do away with both of them. Even in regards to the behaviors men or women will do to attract/maintain friends. Ya know, the whole "mean girl" phenomenon. I suppose some men become bullies in a similar way to how some girls do the mean girl thing. Both sides definitely have some negative behavior.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 09:01 PM
1

So I think this definition does make it neutral. It is a direct reflection to the toxic femininity definition that feminists have created for themselves. Kind of makes both obsolete in a way, but it points out that each gender/sex can make the other develop toxic traits. It is holding both sides accountable for their own, as well as partially responsible for each others, toxic behavior. Here they are side by side: Toxic femininity is a form of internalized misogyny which involves restricting you…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 08:50 PM
1

Same. I'm glad you can see it too. I also really like it because just as the toxic femininity definition comes with a hint of "because of men", this proposed TM definition comes with a hint of "because of women". It is all very cyclical, which is much more in accordance to how things actually are than simply "because of men". At least in my opinion it is... for whatever that is worth.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 08:34 PM
1

Dang, well they should be taking action on them. Kinda messed up that this is where society has landed
/r/MensRights21/04/24 03:31 AM
9

I think it is a good idea. Can this subreddit do a poll? I’d be curious to see what the majority here thinks.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:17 PM
1

Does TikTok allow you to report comments? I would report them for hate speech or something. I don’t use TikTok so idk.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:08 PM
2

Yep, I notice the high standards that men’s rights are held to. Probably somewhat of a good thing. I think it is crazy how much feminism gets away with all the hatred that they spew though. Granted, it seems like society is starting to come around a bit and say that it is going too far, which is quite a relief. But as long as they are not getting shadow banned for it, then I don’t think it is fair to say that we should be either. And to be honest, anger is a natural part of processing painful ex…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 03:46 PM
5

I agree, to an extent. We see the same thing on feminism with women’s rights. It is well known they spend a lot of their time shitting on men and bashing them. I don’t think that is healthy either. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I doubt they are getting shadow banned for it even though they display this same behavior. So should feminism get shadowbanned?? It’s interesting because I’ve read that the oppressed are usually the angriest. It is a natural reaction to what is happening.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 10:38 PM
2

Equivalently, men shouldn't be wasting their energy on women either. Thanks for the tip Megan
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter