TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Complaint_8560 Archive

View 0 posts and 364 comments by Ok_Complaint_8560 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So, in the hypothetical scenario where she engages in hookups, she wouldnt want to with me because she wouldnt enjoy which means the answer would be no? Then thats her answer, and I cant change thay. Id be highly disappointed though, and ask why.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 08:46 PM
0

If the question arises in a conversation, and the hypothetical scenario assumes that my GF is in a position to hookup with me and she does hookups in this context, then yeah I would want her to say yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 08:07 PM
0

Not really IMO. But I do hope in a hypothetical scenario that a woman like this would say yes to a hookuo even if both of us dont engage in that stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 04:45 AM
2

Maybe so. But I dont think what I said is that uncommon though. Thats why I just dont go for women who had hookups. Keeps things simple when filtering. Well, thats good for you and your husband. In an ideal world, thats how it should be. Sadly, its not, and theres a lot of the opposite happening. Do I think women share the sentiment? Maybe. Im sure a lot of women wish it was like that in their current relationship though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 03:19 PM
2

I mean, I havent read or heard as many "I was more horny for my hookup than my GF" anecdotes as much as the womans version of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:23 AM
6

Perfect visualization
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 03:33 AM
2

I guess the difference is guys have the same sexual and physical desire for both women. Meanwhile, women often have more of those desires for the hookup, and the relationship guy doesnt but evokes other more mellow emotions from the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 12:32 PM
7

Agreed. This is exactly how I filter my potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 09:07 AM
0

I've paid for my exes meals when we dated. They did the same for me. Its a back and forth. One of my ex covered for me whenever I was short on cash. I agree that simps ruin the dating world, but theres got to be some line between men paying because they want to and simps paying for crumbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:30 AM
1

Ive been with one. Yeah, they held out for a relationship and not sex. But you know what the side effect of waiting for actual committment does to a woman with high or even just regular libido? I dont think I need to spell it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:09 PM
1

Thats why you talk and initiate physical touch thats subtly sexual in nature during the getting to know phase. Gauge their libido, basically. There are lots of high libido women who only have sex in relationships, and theyre pretty rabid about it too because theyve been holding out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 04:26 PM
1

Yes. Theyre the women I also wanna fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:59 PM
1

Well, if the woman is the same as the man I described, then intimacy happens in a relationship because thats what both wants. There is no "quick" or "waiting" since it happens after exclusivity, meaning theres already a built in "waiting" time, making the woman the man wants for a GF and who he wants to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 03:46 AM
1

Those things can be in one woman if the man in question never did casual or was previously promiscuous despite being high libido, and if they can find a woman similar to them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:19 PM
2

So why do women like fictional men like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 07:44 PM
1

Thats why I followed it up lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 04:08 AM
1

Well, if Im being honest I'd be more open to stay with Girl A than Girl B. Up to a point, or some other circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 08:51 PM
1

I'll break up with both either way, the reason changes things very little. If you think that makes me bad then fine. At least Im getting what I want elsewhere with someone more willing and enthusiastic and shows me the desire I want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 08:12 PM
1

Right. All Im reading is no more experimentation or doing things I would like to do or try. Cool. As I said, Imma just leave. If that makes me a bad person or entitled, then fine. Rather that than be in a situation that sucks and be with a woman thats selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 05:28 PM
1

Hey, Im not gonna force her if she doesn't wanna get wild and experimental with me. I'll just leave, especially if she was wild and experimental in the past. A bad person? I dont think so. Just a person who doesnt wanna get the short end of the stick.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:42 PM
1

Youre misunderstanding. We wont fuck just anything. Rather, when we DO want to fuck, its the sexual desire doesnt fluctuate, and if it does its miniscule. Yeah, we desire womens bodies, all the while desiring our parnter as well. It goes hand in hand. Meanwhile, you just outed yourselves are doing exactly what this post proposes. Yall just dress it up and sugar coat it as "maturity", "growth", and "unsophisticated". Youre really telling me you want us men to feel different levels of sexual desir…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 01:16 PM
2

Thats still sexual desire aimed at our partner. Unlike yall, who sees the human and decide whether yall are gonna be selective or not sexually. This guys gets this much, and that guy gets this much. Sure, sounds great.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:55 PM
1

At least we almost always have a high and consistent sexual desire across all our partners unlike y'all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:46 AM
1

I do. And I think women align or reject narratives when it suits them, and that they love to do mental gymnastics to justify why their sexual desire is selective. And often are highest with the wrong typed of people or randos.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:44 PM
0

They sure like to put themselves there when it suits them lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:37 PM
-1

Couldve fooled me, seeing how things often are. And sure, not all. But most, I feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:47 PM
2

Right, though I feel like a long ass vetting time would detract most, but I guess some play the long game.. Well, the guys after just have to deal with the baggage then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:46 PM
3

So... I guess they cant say no?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 03:14 PM
-1

Why'd they have to go through assholes first though? And why does the assholes get a buffet while the ones after get limited servings?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 01:51 PM
1

Yall can make mistakes. Not everyone deserves to be given a chance just because they changed or learned. No woman who "had her fun" is worth committing to. Its frustrating because I encounter a lot of these women as Im dating. Like, goddamn its like tryna find a needle in a haystack
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:09 AM
1

Those guys are stupid af too. Shoulda known better than dating hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:48 PM
1

If you knew he was a player beforehand, then hell yeah youre one of them. Just like how women say they dont like men who slept around, why would men like women who slept around for fun or when theyre horny. Why would a guy be with a woman when a man who wasnt even her ex can say "your girlfriend let me hit"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:57 AM
1

And yall think low body count men who arent players are gonna want yall women who move like that? "Getting sex" lol yall are the exact same as these guys who sleep arounf for "fun". Exactly why a lot of dudes are still players. Cus the women who talks smack about them still let them hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 04:31 AM
0

As I said, dude still hit. And body count of 10? Thats new coming from a woman, using body count as a criteria lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:54 PM
0

And yet, they hit and yall let them hit. Doesnt make sense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 06:37 PM
0

Sure. Thats her right, but its a privilege to be accepted for those changes. Lots of men wouldnt want a woman like that. Lots of women Im sure have gotten burned and dumped by men they supposedly "cared about" after how they moved got put out in the open. You think their future husband doesnt care? Lots do. Why settle with a woman like that. Thats why more and more men are preferring to be hookups than husbands. If these men value sex as the peak of physical intimacy, and if more women are just …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 04:16 PM
2

Yeah, "good impression". When the hookup material gets the better end of the deal than the husband material. Thats the implication of what women mean by "good impression". Hence, "how women move". And why hookup material is slowly being considered better than husband material.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 03:22 PM
1

"Better impression". Thank god most guys are waking up to how most women move and have been moving.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:51 PM
0

Finally. I hope hookup culture becomes less prevalent in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:42 PM
0

They still get laid though, and you call them losers yet yall would still sleep with them. How does that even work lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:21 PM
–

We dont make it our entire personality like yall do, nor do we have an entire movement for that then do the exact thing in the meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 08:08 AM
2

We're not out in the streets and so butthurt about it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 05:07 AM
1

Rddit eally loves to gaslight dudes into thinking dick size doesnt matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 04:15 AM
2

Not a misogynst? Lolol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:37 PM
12

It is important to me personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:34 PM
2

Because when men talk about vagina dimensions and tightness, women strongly assert that vaginas are always tight and small and that the problem always lies with the smol D.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:33 AM
0

Average is just the middle ground, doesnt mean the middle ground cant lean towards small.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 03:22 AM
1

Im not talking about whats true for every single woman on the planet. Im talking about women not throwing the "not a monolith" reply when its a statement that fits yalls narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 06:16 PM
1

Yall are perfectly fine letting other women speak for you when it fits yalls narrative though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 03:20 PM
0

Well, lots of those women loved the acts though. So long as it wasnt with their partner. If their partner liked doing those acts, I feel he has a right to be upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 07:29 PM
5

It was definitely on the rougher side of things, with some degredation stuff in other comments/posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 07:11 PM
5

There are comments and posts I read where women dont do certain sex acts with their partners because theyre more comfortable doing it with someone they dont have emotional attachment to. Thats a valid scenario for a man to be upset IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 06:35 PM
1

Maybe 7. It depends on the age.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 07:59 PM
1

Around 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 07:54 PM
0

Successful, ambitious, is her own person with her own goals and social circle, and never slept around or engaged in casual sex setups. IMO. They should be one if they wanna find a life partner I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 01:44 PM
1

The west tends to be more promiscuous in general than asia. Not to say there arent people like that here, but its def easier to look for partners who arent doing casual encounters.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 03:03 PM
5

I live in Asia. Theres elements of both here. But for the people I know and the people they know its mostly about just wanting to engage in sexual activities with committed partners. The casual scene exists, but seems like its not the majority that partake. Most people here are all about finding LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 08:40 AM
3

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:58 AM
3

Not American. Also dont live in a small town.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:58 AM
–

Most people I know personally are at a 1 or 2, all in LTRs. Both previous and ongoing. Most people people I know know are also around that ballpark, and were in our late 20s/early 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:30 AM
4

Most people I know have 3 at 30. Most people I know dont sleep around, and most people people I know dont too. Must vary from place to place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:09 AM
–

I think so too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 05:08 AM
3

I guess theyre misreading their dislike for certain women and projecting it as dating opinions. I mean, I get them to an extent. I wouldnt date those kinds of women as well, I just would ignore them as dating options.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 03:16 AM
9

Personally, I think they should just ignore the women they dont like. Woman who learned through bad experiences? Ignore. Dudes would have better chances focusing on women that fit their preferences rather than going after all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:38 PM
1

Lotsa women vet bad boys out because its the right thing to do, not because theyre unattracted to them. These women do exist. I think these are the women a lot of dudes refer to when talking bouy AF/BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:33 PM
2

Drive to fight doesnt really guarantee nor fully negate the hesitation to get hit anywhere from the chest up from someone with a considerable strength advantage. 3 v 1 in an open area isnt good odds, but its winnable IMO. An MMA fighter is no average person though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:34 PM
1

Im no fighter, but the threat of pain from someone generally considerably stronger than you is enough to make someone hesitate to make a move, even if youve got an ally or two. Terrain makes a difference too. In an open area, I see the man winning in multiple ways. In a closed area, yeah I see jumping him as viable. But I wouldnt discount the strength gap and getting 1 clean hits in during the chaos to even things out. Not saying its gonna be easy, the possibility of a nut shot ending it is very…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:08 PM
–

Why would they adjust when that course of action gets the best results?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 07:32 PM
–

Id like to think of it as a specialist vs a jack of all trades.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 07:03 AM
1

We both didnt want to do an indefinite LDR situation. Life/work stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 02:43 AM
1

Maybe so. Im not versed in any of that stuff. But I still stand by my follow up comment. A billion women is too big to not have women with the combination of traits that I prefer. My ex was one, unless you think all billion women lie. Which I think you might tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 02:23 AM
1

How so? And if you doubt a woman like that could exist in a sample size of around a billion women spread around the world, then i dont really know what to tell ya. Youve got your own set of beliefs at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 02:06 AM
–

Well, dont we all? There exists women of my preference without being religious or overly devout though. If absolute degenerates can exist, something as tame as women I want surely do. Abundance may vary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:20 PM
–

Nope. Not religious at all, and not seeking exclusively religious women. She could have a religion I guess, just not those overly devout ones hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:15 PM
–

Never sounds too absolute IMO, in a world where upwards of a billion people exist. If thats your worldview, its cool. Ive got mine too. Im just not keen on putting words that imply any sort of absoluteness in it. I prefer it to have some sort of wiggle room for deviation and variation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:11 PM
–

Im not really worried about how promiscuity relates to cheating and all that. Just a matter of how I view sexual intimacy and how I want my partner to view it as well. Marriage depends on the people who enter it. Personally, marriage seems great from what Ive seen from people I know. Yours is probs the opposite though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:02 PM
–

None. Get curious and tempted at times, but I want a woman who never had casual sex so Im tryna be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:28 PM
2

You dont need good looks to have friends, like what? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:26 PM
10

Or that youre not actually attractive and theyre blowing air up his ass. Empty compliments.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:35 PM
1

True, no use denying that. But there are those who arent, in comparable number.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:15 PM
1

Well, those dudes are hypocrites then. That certain minority may need context as to why theyre called that, so Im not gonna touch on that. Im just talking about in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:06 PM
0

Yall are free to do that though. Youll just get dunked on for it, cus its not behavior that most look fondly on. Not hard to understand. Men are also free to categorize as you said, as do women who categorize men. Men dont like sluts, simple as fhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:36 PM
1

I fail to see where I wrote saving for marriage. But I guess its all the same to yall when you cant have your ONSs and FWBs. I dont ascribe to any denomination, but I see howd you make that connection to religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:28 PM
1

You dont have to. I just said its part of life. Youre free to struggle against it. Right, because not sleeping around means a sexless society. Thats like complaining you didnt eat cus you didnt get that 10th slice of rib. But again, you can think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:22 PM
1

Thats fine. Im personally not any of those men, though I do keep sexualizing women to myself anyways. Dont sleep around, and Ive had the opportunity. Youll be labelled a slut if you sleep around, not if you sleep with your partner in a relationship. Double standards exist. Its a reality of life. And since pushing promiscuity wont work, thats why I suggested de-incentivizing men from promiscuity. Thats much easier Id reckon.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:37 AM
1

Just putting it out there. Unless those terms denote Im some sort of criminal, it doesnt matter to me. It makes sense. Too much of anything is a bad thing. So yeah, promiscuity is bad. May not be physically, though it could. Sleeping with randos from the club or people you barely know from apps is psomiscuous, and shows recklessness and lack of personal physical saftety. Low body count but had casual sex? Promiscuous would apply. I dont really care where it came from. Too much of anything is a b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:19 AM
2

I dont really need to get over anything, nor do I care about what you call me really. Sex isnt nad thing, as is eating. Promiscuity is, as is overeating. So, yeah the current outlook of society on promiscuity fits me just fine. So again. No need to do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:02 AM
1

Because promiscuity will always be viewed negatively to some degree, by both men ans women. Men will probs tolerate it, but most wont list it as a plus or green flag relationship material trait. Theres already a huge pushback on it now and its only been recently gaining some semblance of "acceptance", for a lack of a better word, in recent years.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:54 AM
2

If women pushed for non promiscuity on men as much as men do women, Id bet theyd be able to move the needle. But women seem to much more lenient towards these kinds of dudes so nothing sticks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:20 AM
1

True. Theyll never move from slut to wife material though, personally speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:18 AM
2

Very insightful comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:07 PM
0

I lean towards a quarterly evaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:37 PM
1

Yup. How he accepts it is up to him though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:59 PM
1

Its up to them to manage risks and expectations if they subscribe to the mentality. Realistically dreams dont come true, but we dream still.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:30 PM
1

Idk if its harmful or not. If it works, it works. If not, then either change or stay single. Why do you think its harmful anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:28 PM
0

Yes. And why is the automatic assumption that the man isnt improving and the woman is inexperienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 10:27 PM
1

She could be great in all those things, but I value the sexual aspect a lot more than those. Sex IMO is the highest form of physical intimacy both could give. Hence why I dont engage in casual sex. Emotional intimacy involves an aggregate of things so that has more leeway. And both should be me at the top. And if sex isnt up to par, then I march on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:29 PM
1

What other aspects.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:15 PM
1

Whos to say shes the best relationship? I dont consider it the best if sexually Im not the best. Its a selfish want but its my want. Its what I want to be in my partners opinion. And competitiveness had its place. Dating is largely considered a competition anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:14 PM
1

Wasnt me lol. Somebody upvoted me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:11 PM
1

Im not worried with how things sound most times. Is cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:03 PM
1

I dont, but I see his point. Its hypercompetitive, but if athletes and businessmen succeed with such mentality then it has some basis. Its not viable for everyone though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:02 PM
2

No. Thats what you think, and thats cool. Yall love that word too much though IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:17 PM
2

As you said, you do you. But Id rather be single than be less than number 1 sexually. As they say, people that are worth it are hard to come by anyways. And Imma try to find that woman or none at all. Also, enjoying something doesnt really indicate magnitude or degree. Its a vague quantifier. I enjoy a fast food, but no way Im picking fast food over premium eats if I had the choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:15 PM
2

I think its unreasonable to stay with a woman who thinks of another man when asked about her best sexual experiences. Thats like being with someone who loves her ex more than you, but its alright cus shes with you. Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:08 PM
1

I did say after a considerable amount of time. That of course implies I tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:05 PM
1

I aint staying with a woman who has someone else on her mind thats associated with great sex, not just good/ok/satisfying sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:01 PM
0

Guess you change the things you hate about yourself. If you hate that youre unfit, then you use the disgust you feel when you see yourself in the mirror to workout until youre fit. Rinse and repeat for every undesirable thing on your person.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 07:58 PM
3

I mean, Im not arguing with you. She should get to experience her best sex if she stumbles upon it before me, but if she doesnt consider me her best after a considerable amount of time then Im out. Isnt your point that she should be able to?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 07:54 PM
2

She can, but Im gonna go look for another woman who will have her best with me. And if I never find her, lifes still cool w/o a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 07:49 PM
1

Guess we all have loopholes for our behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 04:45 PM
1

Doesnt that fit the definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:28 PM
1

Aint that what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 11:09 AM
1

Dont you sleep around though? Or am I confusing you for some other Redditor.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:36 AM
1

If a man wants a woman that never had a hookup, then its his business to know. And if the woman wont tell the truth, then move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:11 AM
1

Well, if he doesnt want a girl with a hookup past it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:08 PM
1

Nah. Lots of men like myself dont want women who slept around. Questions are asked to see if yall are compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:44 PM
2

Eyy glad we could agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:42 PM
1

And thats how it should be. A question answered honestly. Not this lie cus its none of his business narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:42 PM
1

Patience doesnt mean wait around forever when theres no change in sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:48 AM
1

Yeah, anything outside of a relationship is a hookup IMO. Well, good for yall that you shared. Some guys arent so lucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:46 AM
1

Sure. But Im not waiting forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:39 AM
1

See, this is why I dont date women who had a hoe phase. It avoids instances like this. Keeps things standardized and fair-ish. And also why I would ask in the hypothetical scenario her reasons if she wouldnt hookup with me and ask her to be truthful. Lying is misrepresentation IMO. Does your BF even know youve hooked up before?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 10:01 AM
1

Thats why Im gonna ask lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:48 AM
1

Then we both make effort to break that routine more times than not. Im not bouta get served meh steak by someone that served premiun ribeye routinely in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:36 AM
1

No, but if shes unwilling to put the same effort and gusto during sex with me then best to just part ways and find someone that feels the fire for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:06 AM
1

Its average. Its basically baseline 0. Unremarkable. Ok, not great. Its what I would describe food that fills me up, but Id pick something better if there was one. Dude before basically got prime ribeye steak, her current partner gets the run of the mill diner "steak". Its alright, but you wont remeber the taste after a few hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:53 PM
1

Healthy can mean ok and passable. The average person is healthy, yet look unremarkable. Its kinda like that. Doesnt really mean its as great as when she was wilder, and the dude is missing out greatly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:47 PM
1

Hypothetically? Id ask the reason why. Maybe thered be no guy shed hookup with, even hypothetically. Great. But the opposite of that wouldnt be so great.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 06:22 PM
2

Where? If the question was presented then yeah I would want her to consider me as such in a hypothetical what if scenario. Where tf is the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 06:00 PM
1

This is why I avoid women who hookup. I aint getting put on a possibly lower tier than another guy. And in a hypothetical scenario with said woman Id also want her to consider me hookup material, despite us not partaking in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:24 PM
1

If a woman who has emotional attachment to me wont have sex with me and she does with guys she doesnt, then she aint gonna be my woman to begin with. This is exactly why lots of guys prefer their women to express love physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 03:12 AM
3

Well, lying bout sexual history matters to me. She better hide that well if she lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:50 PM
1

STDs can come from anywhere even from committed partners so Im not concerned bout that in this context. Idk if its moral, but I aint getting with women who have casual. I never did despite getting offers, and Id want a woman whose the same. It shows she views sex as intimate only shared with their BF. Idc if she gets tested every possible timeframe and uses a condom each time. She aint a potential partner candidate to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:49 PM
4

Well, guess even things kept secret matter then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:45 PM
1

Eh, dont really care. If they need to hide it, then Id just assume theyre promiscuous. If they lie well time will tell, or others might during the vetting phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:43 PM
0

Because Im the one evaluating whether the woman is gonna be a compatible partner to me or not? Hence Im deciding her value as a partner to me. Idc what others think of her, if shes gonna be my GF then my opinion is all that matters. And hey, sucks you got cheated on. Nobody deserves that. But I gotta stand my ground on this one. I decide the value of a woman as a partner if shes gonna be with me, as she does decide my value to her. And for what its worth, I dont ask for body counts. I ask whethe…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 04:20 PM
1

Well, if theyre gonna lie they better keep that under wraps like Fort Knox. Asking around about her might also uncover truths theyd rather not say so thats a viable option. But sure, lie about it. And women who dont want men with history like that should dig deep and dig well to avoid those dudes. You may not care, but not everybody cares about the same things. And to me, it may not define your value as a human, but it does as a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:32 PM
2

Because our sexual views dont align? Thats important to me so that plays an important role in if theyre worthwhile or not. Doesnt really have to make sense to you, Im just sayin be honest at the very least.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:11 PM
1

Nah modern times is great, though Im sure the 50s were bangin too. Promiscuous women may have increased a lot, but there are still lotsa women who arent. Theres even some kinda rise in anti-casual mentality nowadays from the current gens. So Im in good company. A worthwhile partner isnt easy to find anyways, but when you do its great lol. Gotta sift through the ones who arent first.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:33 PM
1

Eyy good riddance to them as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:26 PM
2

The reason for me is I just dont want someone promiscuous who treats sex or relationships like a throwaway. This comes in the form of casual sex or a string of STRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:24 PM
1

Just respond with the truth lol. Imma just excuse myself after anyways if theyre promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:22 PM
1

Very true. Keeps me from having to filter these women ouf myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:21 PM
3

That makes them a shit partner if they have to lie about a known dealbreaker of their SO. Shaming culture be damned, give them the agency to decide .
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:19 PM
8

I wouldnt be hurt, Id just find another woman whose sexual views align with my own.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:17 PM
6

Nothing matters so long as nobody finds out by that logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:16 PM
1

Hey, I understand everything youre saying. Its reasonable. Hence why I dont date promiscuous women and only go for committment first women. Also, I dunno about guys in this sub but Im not exactly in a dry season when it comes to women. Just that theres a lot of promiscuous women to sift through, surprisingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:31 AM
1

No effect on the quality. Or maybe there are, but its probably contextual. Its purely preference though. A few dates that possibly reaches a few months you mean. To me it is at least. Its obviously different to you. Yeah, a few dates that could mean a few months. I assume you know how many many hours apart a few months is to 24 hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:22 AM
1

Or it could be just as simple as what I suggested though, right? Bottom line is one got there faster than the other, by hook or by crook. She couldve did all those things with the hookup, minus the spending time outside the bedroom. If to certain men, sex is the ultimate form of physical desire and intimacy, then theres little to be said. Nothing will compare. Not oral, not fingering, not kissing, not time together. Its sex. If shes not willing to fuck despite all the supposed chemistry and she …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 06:59 PM
1

People argue that pineapple doesnt belong on pizza. People argue back that it does. Rarely is it settled to "its just a preference". Some people believe in things enough to think its what it should be. I mean, Im sure there are things you believe in enough that others doing the opposite would make you think its inferior in a way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 06:46 PM
2

Thats bscktracking though, unless youre purposefully making two contradicting statements for some strange reason
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 06:42 PM
2

Well, for one and for me personally they most likely value sex differently. I love sex, but I only have it withing relationships. Id want my partner to be the same too. And if they value relationships, most of it would be in LTRs. Those two combined logically would result in low N counts. Thats a better partner for me, maybe not necessarily for you. Well, you could also date a criminal and have a loving partner. Id wager theres a lot of out there genuinely loved by their families, just that they…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:25 AM
2

I didnt say its the only kind you dated, just that youd date them. I think theres a difference, and the reason why I said you cast a wide net. Also, people who are either most likely have less filters than most people considering their jobs, so they also cast a wide net. I think its more accurate that rather than them "widening" their net, its just that most caught in their net wouldnt really date them. I wouldnt date a woman with a history of casual sex anyway as I only fuck in a relationship, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:15 AM
2

Id argue it does if youre looking for someone who isnt promiscuous. Better results is exactly that to the ones looking for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 10:54 AM
–

Why does it sound like that youre advocating for guys to lower their standards just so their dating pool gets bigger? Youre in the minority of guys who dates hookers and webcam models so its no wonder your net is so wide. You basically have minimal filters applied it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:27 AM
1

Didnt you literally just say in a previous comment that hooking up is something a lot of women if not most has done? Why are you backtracking?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:25 AM
–

Whats wrong with making your dating pool smaller? Youd think that gets you better, albeit lesser, results. Women who sleep or slept around just isnt appealing to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:08 AM
3

Yes, Ive pleased most of my girlfriends. I also dont have ED, so idk where you got that from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:27 PM
4

Guess I have slight but hypothetical one then. It wouldnt be insulting to me for a woman to want a relationship rather than a hookup. Id have an issue if she didnt consider me someone shed hookup with if she was still doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:25 PM
3

Wasnt tryna argue though. Youd rather my comment be argumentative?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:33 PM
4

Reasonanble POV. Still wouldnt date low n woman with a history of "trying" casual sex. Sucks cus the women who fit this description were attractive to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:15 PM
2

Thats certainly true. Not the kind of woman for me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 02:15 PM
1

I dont think women should only be limited to hookups and casual if theyve ever dabbled in it. Men and others like me wont consider them for a relationship though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 02:11 PM
1

I dont think everyone is inconsistent. A lot are though, but Im not gonna guarantee that. I agree with your argument regarding people who do casual and insist that sex is special. I dont believe them too, personally. I woudlnt date a woman who can have sex with some rando or fwb. I dont, but women seem to get upset, or at least get argumentative, that men have an aversion to women who engage in casual, or make relationship material wait while letting some hookup hit immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:51 PM
2

If waiting before having sex was always the womans way of doing things, then fine. But if she has had a history of not waiting, then made me wait, Im not staying around for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:05 PM
2

Agree with this 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:21 AM
2

I dont do casual sex. I think women who do and who do a lot of it are ran through. I dont really care if its insulting to them or not. Theyre not my target market anyways. And plenty of women who call other women ran through. Not lacking in my target market too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:17 AM
-1

What if theyre just being descriptive of these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:09 AM
1

Double digits.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 06:08 AM
1

Maybe theyre looking for dealbreakers in someones history. I do. Especially those who slept around.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 04:13 PM
-1

This is why going for women who dont hookup solves this problem. They feel genuine desire for you, but refrain from sex outside of relationships out of personal choice. Women who hookup and make BF material men wait are whats got these dudes all up in a bunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:06 AM
1

Previous generations always find what the current gen does as weird. Personally, I think the current gen knowing exactly what they want and asking the uncomfortable stuff is cool. May not widen their dating pool, but isnt that the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:00 AM
1

Well, whether its most ppl or not, doesnt matter. Im ruling out promiscuous women. Ive done so twice already anyways. I dont think Im a prude. I love sex. Just wanna have it in a relationship with a like-minded woman. Youre free to hold that opinion though. Doesnt really mean anything to me. Ive an opinion of you too, just the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:41 PM
1

I'll say theres wiggle room for context. It aint a lot though until its a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:27 AM
–

Yeah. I get the initial pushback to be honest, but IMO the end result is reaaallyy beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 10:05 AM
3

Just because its normal doesnt mean anything to me. I dont want a promiscuous woman. Also, I thought promiscuity wasnt a "most ppl" thing? Or are women not in agreement with each other on this thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 10:04 AM
1

Maybe imposed is too strong a word. But I think the concept is the same. Yeah I can leave, but if I dont Im still being made to wait. Its the principle I guess. Im not gonna wait if she didnt make everyone wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 10:00 AM
1

I actually prefer women waiting for committment before having sex. Thats how I do it. The problem lies when thats imposed on me and not to others before.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 06:16 AM
2

I kinda think men need to be more intentional with their style. Ive been that dude who could care less what I wear, and I still am at times, but Im pleasantly surprised how good it makes me feel once I started dressing relatively better. Its not over the top and borderline metrosexual, but definitely better than plain jeans and a shirt. Ex partners' styling tips helped as well. Makes for a great bonding experience. Wearing better clothes and being conscious of what we wear as men on occasion ain…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 11:49 AM
1

I mean when one doesnt tend to sleep around casually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:18 PM
1

Must be hard to date there if you lean the other side of the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 03:48 PM
5

This is what I do. I just filter out promiscuous women from my dating pool. Its annoying though. Seems like promiscuous women outnumber those who arent as the year goes by.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 01:51 PM
–

Im a man and I agree. Your partner has to consider you at least around an 8 physically. I dont wanna be seen purely as the personality pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:18 AM
1

I would drop her immediately. Im cool with waiting until were official, thats how I go about it too personally despite being a high libido dude. But Im not cool with casual setups and hookups being part of my partners history. Shows her attitude towards sexual intimacy. Also, having that setup shows shes possibly put sex in 2 categories. One where Ive gotta prove Im somehow relstionship material to share that activity with her, which is a higher bar. While the other gets some arbitrary and shall…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:45 AM
1

It should be discussed at some point before going official though IMO. And yes I agree, and Id say that maybe instead of tolerating it women, especially women who arent into promiscuity, they should actively be against that behavior. Discouraging promiscuous men would in turn decrease women from hooking up I would guess. Problem is, sex sells and sex is so ingrained in the content each new gen consumes at an early age. Doesnt seem like the trend is gonna go away anytime soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:24 PM
2

Id argue though that women with no past history of hookups and FWBs are dwindling in number every X years or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:06 PM
6

I think if guys en masse actively try to seek out girls who dont engage in casual sex, theyd avoid this kind of dilemma.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 07:40 AM
1

You ghosting saves me a lot of trouble though. Shows me that you most likely slept around, and that youre willing to vanish in the wind cus you didnt like a question trying to evaluate compatibility in values. Good riddance Id say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:05 AM
1

Well, I'll just say it takes a certain kind of person to do that. And it aint the good kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 08:24 PM
1

Yup. Plus, she would have to live everyday with the fact that if I knew I never would have committed to her. That must suck a lot that your relationship is a farce.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 08:09 PM
2

Theyd have to lie in order to do that. And what does that make them? A liar, and I believe thats not good trait in a partner either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 08:02 PM
1

All I do is ask if theye dabbled in casual sex before. Usually eliminates all the waiting problem dudes hate a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:54 PM
2

My bad. I guess the more apt wording would be "This is why I enter exclusive relationships only with women who have no hsitory nor interest in casual sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:47 PM
2

Id assume conversations on various topics arise as you both get to know each other in thr dating phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:36 PM
2

This is why I date women who have no history nor interest in casual sex. Eliminates this factor entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:19 PM
1

No, not really. I dont see anywhere in this specific comment thread where you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 09:00 AM
–

The person I replied to specifically stated she needed more time for sex with a romsntic partner than a hookup. Do you share the sentiment or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:20 PM
1

I did say I dont blame them. Also changed the term to a more apt one. I just dont wanna date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:17 PM
2

No doubt. And women complain about it too as they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:10 PM
2

Fans arent partners, but these lots of these fans definitely wanna be. And as I did say, it doesnt really matter if these flags were visible or not from the get go. Maybe the termnI should have used was "women with a history of bad relationships".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:08 PM
–

If you dont really hold the same views of "waiting" as the comment I replied to, then I dont get the point of your comment? It doesnt apply to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:06 PM
–

There are. Idk why but there are. Chris Browns got hella female fans. And there are most likely lotsa Chris Browns types who arent famous who have women lining up despite their negative qualities. May not be most women, but their numbers arent scarce thats foe sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:01 PM
–

The usual. Cheaters, abusers, liars. Idk why you want me to list them down when youve most likely got an idea what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:53 PM
–

Staying and or wanting red flag men. Either these flags were visible from the get go or not. Not blaming them for staying or not leaving early, just dont want the baggage personally. Theres a couple more I could give probably, but you get the idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:41 PM
–

Both. Men make brain dead decisions as well when it comes to women. AITAH and the Overreacting subs got a lot. Well, the ones that are likely real anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:34 PM
–

The only reason I guess it bothers me is I gotta wade through a lotta women with a history of bad decisions and hookups to find a potential partner. Wouldnt call it being angry though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:13 PM
–

Why the difference in timeframes with sex between the two men?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:47 PM
–

I dont think I can infer anything just from a quick, passing observation. What I do think is how some of these dudes get women waayy out of their league. Its probably either dudes got personality, money or their in some form of transactional setup.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 06:28 PM
1

I definitely agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 07:07 PM
1

Yeah. No problems with waiting. But if she isnt consistent with making everybody wait within a relative timeframe, Id just leave and find another woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:57 AM
0

I for one am glad that my generation is setting a new standard in engaging in less hookups to ho hookups. More pool of women to be potential partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:42 PM
0

Maybe because men put sex higher on the things they value in both casual and a relationship. Sex is one of the, arguably if not the highest, higher forms of physical intimacy. The most vulnerable for sure. Youre naked and alon with another person after all. So if they get that from a hookup faster than they get it in a relationship, they feel that the hookup material bears more desirable results. And it trumps most emotional intimacy as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:40 PM
–

1st sentence assumes she let every man wait around similar timeframes. 2nd sentence is no I didnt because I dont do casual sex. My answer was based on the hypothetical scenario where I am engaging in sex outside relationships. And if I did, I would ask for a hookup. And if I did and I was looking for a relationship, I would ask how long she usually waits before shes comfortable with sex, and if she applies that timeframe with all men she dates with intent to LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:34 PM
1

No issue with that too. But I also see guys not being into that as no issue as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 07:44 AM
–

Well, if the woman generally has sex early on pretty quickly with most guys I dont see the problem with that. It shows consistency. Its the other scenario where guys get riled up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 07:04 AM
–

Im not really coming at it from just the looks perspective. Sex is very evidently important to guys. Personally, I dont engage in casual sex but I do see where thesr guys come from. Like, sex is makes yall physically vulnerable and stuff. But a guy you wouldnt wanna hang out outside the bedroom has an expedited timetablr than the supposedly potential partner guy? Seems weird to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:49 AM
–

So they arent interested in chad but get naked ang physically vulnerable with them anyways off the bat? Yet the guy she sees as a potential partner doesnt get the same energy in the sexual department?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:26 AM
–

Yeah, I honestly think men should just leave if they felt disrespected with being held to those standards. You can be disappointed it didnt work out, but drop the grudged I guess. Ive personally walked away a couple of times too. Not because I felt disrespected, just knew they werent the type of women I wanted in a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:09 AM
–

As a man, I also would never date a woman whos had casual sex. Not because I find it disgusting, probably because as a man my libido overrides that mindset. But I personally want a woman who views sex as something done with a partner, so I mold myself into that same standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:05 AM
–

I guess thats maybe privelege going way too far. Or just straight up hating. No denying lots of commenters here go full on rabid. But personally, I also wouldnt date women like the ones were talking about. Wouldnt date women with history of casual sex in general. Wouldnt cuss them out though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:57 AM
–

Idk bout other men but everybody is allowed learn to and grow. Its our right. Problem is, no one is entitled to give us a chance after weve done our character development. Acceptance is a privelege.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:51 AM
–

Im ok with no sex until shes comfortable for a substantial period of time. Im not ok if she let some dude hit within the day or some other time range that I personally feel isnt right for me. If thats the case, Im looking for another woman. No time for inconsistent sexual behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:20 AM
1

I dunno if this is an unpopular opinion, but Im glad that our generation and those after us are having significantly less casual sex than previous gens. As a man that filters out women who have had casual sex, its great to have a bigger pool of potential partners. And what you said is true. Just as women wanna be proud of the husband they have, men as well wanna have a wife they can be proud of. Wives with no... unsavory past indiscretions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 05:39 AM
0

This is exactly why I datr girls who dont do and never have done hookups. Avoids the dilemma altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 08:28 PM
2

People who exclusively have sex within a relationship are not a minority where Im from. Just putting that out there. That depends depending on the place where youre at.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 05:23 AM
–

So in a purely sexual contest, the red flag guys have the upper hand due to traits inherent to them. Well, that sucks lol. But I see what youre trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 08:23 PM
–

I agree. Guys wanna be more than the "good" guy to their woman. Also explains why theres such a pushback towards the "bf/husband" material term. Its kinda confusing as well why women always have their best sex with a red flag person, and that its like a general rule the best man will never be the best sex. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:36 AM
–

Care to share your takes on these screenshots?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:48 AM
2

You got a deep bag man hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:56 PM
3

Dudes snarky and annoying af.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:55 PM
1

Where do you get these man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:52 PM
2

Wonder why I never see women comment under your comment in these threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:52 PM
–

Pick mes becuase theyre probably the minority of women who are ok with it. Pick mes are usually in the minority of any opinion women in general dont genrally hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:58 PM
0

In my defense, I did say mostly. Even soaps and sanitizers advertise a 99% germ kill rate. You cant erase them all. Also, Id wager youd have to intentionally go looking for those. And youd have to dig deep and hard to find it. So, I acknolwdge what you said, but I stand by my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:48 PM
–

Hey, I see that. But if Im being honest thats still cherry picking in my opinion. Most guys go on PornHub to get their fix. Its mostly big names and verified amateurs there. Theyre sanitized as fuck. So its mostly what youd call "ethical". Most guys arent tryna dig the internet for low budget gonzo stuff. Cmon now. I hope you also see where guys are coming from when theyre hesitant to use toys on women. At least, phallic shaped toys. Especially the outrageous ones. The "unethical" equivalent in …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:42 PM
–

Yeah. But were talking about porn in general. Mainstream porn, which men consume for the content. Theres a lot of unethical shady stuff in every mainstream thing. Gaming industry overworks staff, but isnt even a talking point 9.9/10 times. For most dudes. Its just mainstream porn. Your typical big name pornstar. It generally isnt that deep, unless youre intentionally cherry picking thr bad stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:34 PM
–

Sure. But porn is a huge umbrella. Cant just label what dudes watch as unethical just cause its porn. Its may not be a small number, but it most probably isnt the majority of mainstrean porn anyway. Just like how movies have "snuff" films, and abusive tendecies towards the crew, but we dont call that unethical. Idk, kinda seems like cherrypicking to me. Also, some of the dildo sizes out there seems "unethical" too if you ask me. Or rather, fucking outrageous. Id see why dudes are hesitant to eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:28 PM
–

I guess OPs point is that a lot of women shame men for watching porn, but expect men to generally be ok with using her toys on her even if the guy isnt all that enthusiastic about the idea. And if he makes that lack of enthusiasm known, theyre called insecure and dont care about her pleasure or whatever. I think watching porn shouldnt be seen as "bad", same as with toys I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:22 PM
–

Yeah, whats all this talk about ethics? Its just getting off using different sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 08:16 PM
–

Exactly. Problematic behaviors arent really guaranteed hindrances in having a good life. In fact, you could argue it might even get you farther in life. Look at politicians for instance lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 09:05 PM
–

This applies to even actual problematic behaviors. Being a douche doesnt always actively hinder any aspect of your life. Not tryna argue though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:56 PM
5

Desirable? Makes it look like youre "safe" but "boring" enough to not be with any of them. Thats like a 0/10 FG%. Doesnt make you look desirable at all if theyre all platonic or you got rejected by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:46 AM
2

Have a hoe/wild phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:28 AM
1

Beggar mentality fucks up a lot of dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:22 AM
1

Id be out. I dont date women who are into casual sex, especially those who fuck around within their immediate social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 05:40 AM
1

No ones forcing you lol. Just dont be insecure bout it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:40 PM
1

Yup. Thats usually how the progression goes for casual sex enjoyers lolol. Im not surprised. Its convenient after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:40 PM
1

Lol coming from someone whos had casual sex. So much for considering it a special act.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:39 AM
1

Well, Ive never had casual and paid for hookers so if were moralizing then youve got 1 leg to stand on lol. Past isnt the past after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:39 AM
1

Exactly. No morals at all. Its so convenient that "changed" women can just sweep it under the rug though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:48 AM
1

Hey, you do you. Its just sex tho lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:47 AM
1

Different morals. I could say women who had casual sex will forever be hoes with no morals, but I bet you would argue against that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:56 AM
1

Maybe youre insecure you cant live up to the skills of the prostitute. Cant give the same pleasure. Its a very plausible reason other than "digust". Which is confusing since its just sex after all. Casual sex also is just using each others bodies, which objectifies them. You didnt seem to have that problem before lol. Past is past. And not wanting a woman who had sex with attractive men isnt insecurity, its knowing previoud behaviors and avoiding being settled for. Cus thats happens a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:46 AM
1

No morals or just different morals? Dont be insecure. Hes not commodifying them, the women are commodifying themselves. Plus, past is past. Insecurity through the roof when its just sex lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:30 AM
1

Still its just sex. Consenting adults and all that schtick. Least theyre getting paid and not just having bad sex like your hookup guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:27 AM
1

Right. So what you did aint that far off from a man having sex with a prostitute. Stop being insecure. Its just sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 02:45 AM
2

Why? Its just sex lol. Hookups basically boil down to using another persons body for your pleasure anyway. Its just a step below prostitution. How convenient you dislike it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 02:42 AM
1

Did you love everyone you hooked up with? Were they special? If not your words are just empty platitudes. Past is past. Dont be insecure about them prositutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:15 PM
–

So long as its just a vibrator, then its fine. It wouldnt be me bringing it up though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 07:49 PM
1

Its ironic how she calls the dudes here unable to keep a point but then stumbles through her own arguments. Funny af.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 03:58 AM
–

This particular redditor is exactly like that. Contrarian to the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 03:47 AM
2

Hell yeah. Probably got Kobes work ethic down pat too. Straight obssessive. No life, just ball(Reddit).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:43 PM
2

I aint putting up numbers like you though. You use the word without using it correctly. Ironic lol. Hey, no ones stopping you. Its your life. Maybe literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:35 PM
2

That doesnt seem to be the context of the comment you replied to. Just because they complain about women doesnt mean they have no life lol. Never said you cant. I said you didnt. Might be a difference there. Of course. Thats statistics. Its quantifiable lol. Your no life comment extrapolates based on their behavior here. Which is complaing and being here in this sub lol. Cmon now. Youre welcome. Irony is funny isnt it? Lololol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:27 PM
3

Howd you know theyre lacking any of those you mentioned? Because they complain and are here everyday? Lolol. Aint that ironic. I have no criteria. Thats the point, because theres no way to know and yet you slap that label on to them. You have something quantifiable though, which is the 60 comments a day. If were to believe the stats the other redditor layed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:17 PM
–

Idk. Whats your criteria for calling those who hang out here as having no lives? So basically everyday is a Sunday for you. Those you call having no lives might also just be lazy and chronically online as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:06 PM
–

It is crazy. Normal people with lives dont comment 60 times on Reddit everyday lol. Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:55 PM
–

Her favorite thing on this sub is the irony after all. Its ironic she calls those who hang out in this sub as having no lives when shes basically here everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 07:54 PM
1

Dude youve gotta be attractive physically first. Everything else is a secondary requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 11:11 AM
1

Its her right to want change if its genuine. People tend not to be though and abuse that loophole in Christianity to be "cleansed" and "forgiven" just like that. But oh well. Happy for people like her, but I still wont date a former hoe. Aint now way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 08:05 PM
–

Nothing to do with your points. I was just commenting on the methods women use to take accountability, specifically therapy and self help books. Cus to reach that point where theyd need those just to cope their decision making woulda definitely have taken a nose dive at some point. Before or during the relationahip. Feel free to ignore me and my comment though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:07 AM
–

I wouldnt wanna date a woman who needed therapy to recover from a past relationship. What kinda decision making is that to get to that point, from the vetting process to when youre already in the relationship getting shit on.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:55 AM
1

Then dont worry bout dat hooker he had fun with hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 01:34 PM
1

Still not entitled to his past. Nun of your bizznezz.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 11:18 AM
1

Oohh ask you what? Ask you if youll ask them if theyve been with hookers? Yea sure thats pure self glaze if Ive ever seen one lmaooo. Goddamned entitled women up in dis btchhh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 10:08 AM
1

Woah asking a man their sexual past? How dare you, you entitled woman. Dont be insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:57 AM
1

Youll never know, cus youre not entitled to that info lolol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:52 AM
1

Dooeessnt matterrrr lolol. Ncount is ncount bruhh. Still not entitled to a mans past. Just gotta accept that the man a woman ends up with might have dabbled with a prostitute or 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:43 AM
1

High ncount women bad. Why? reason here Men seeing prostitutes bad. Why? reason here Dont really see the difference in preference aside from an arbitrary reason held by that person. The reason doesnt fucken matterr bruhh. Aaaanndd still not entitled to a mans past. Tough luck to women who are like you ending up with men who sees prostitutes hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:32 AM
1

Nuh uh. Women arent entitled to a mans past.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:23 AM
1

Sure. Women arent entitled to know the men theyre with avail the services of prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:11 AM
1

Still nun of your bizznezzzzz
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:45 AM
1

And?? I didnt know I was talking to the personification of all women lolol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:27 AM
1

Same goes for high N-count women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:54 AM
1

Fucking broken record you are lolol come up with something actually substantial instead of regurgitating tired old talking points bruuuhh. With the way you recurse your arguments youre drawing the shape of a number that represents your capability to form new thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:07 AM
1

Cooking or ordering fried chicken is? Didnt know we got a fucking food snob over here lololol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:00 AM
2

Just cus you can cook fried chicken doesnt mean youre above ordering fried chicken some days bruhhh. Cmoonnn lololol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:22 AM
1

Im sure thats what you tell yourself at night to feel good about your worldview lololol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:14 AM
1

Like shed know in the first place lolol. Women aint the only ones who can lie and say "aint nun of your bizznesss".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 05:02 AM
1

Oohhh just throwing whatever and hoping it sticks? Aint that a sight lololol. Still nun of your bizznezz what two consenting adults wanna doo bruhhh. Get with the times you dinosaur.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:42 AM
2

Cant get women but in a dead bedroom? Stop reaching bruhhh. Or at least stay consisent in you rebutts lololol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:27 AM
2

I think women have a "not a monolith" line they use for generalizations like this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 04:21 AM
2

None of your bizznezzz
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 07:18 PM
1

I guess its because relationship material men dont wanna be lesser to hookup material men in the sexual department. This causes reactions, sometimes averse, when presented with this possibility. And sadly that possibility seems like the common case in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 04:46 AM
2

During those first 5 years of meh sex did you also have thoughts of leaving or did that start during the last 5?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 04:36 AM
8

Great sex seems to make women stay longer in a failing relationship than being a good partner whos meh or less than meh at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 10:32 AM
3

Shes a contrarian just for the sake of being one. One or two replies max when engaging with her lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:54 PM
1

Dude willingly married this woman who I assume showed signs of not wanting him from the very beginning. Were just seeing now what has always been their relationship from the start. I have no sympathy for dudes this desperate theyd get with a woman like her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:50 PM
1

The ideal kind of woman if you ask me. Dudes with issues concerning different standards between casual and committed should just pour all their effort into finding women who never had casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 11:04 AM
-7

This is why I dont date women who have engaged in casual sex. Automatically avoids most of these "casual vs committed" standards when it comes to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 11:02 AM
1

So money isnt the end all be all. Its cool that youre pretty aware of what you want. Yeah, nowhere else is this topic discussed to the degree and with as much passion except in here lol. Entertaining to read people argue so much. Anyways, was cool to share POVs even though we had slightly different ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 08:19 PM
1

Yeah, same here. I consider those intimate acts so I dont wanna be doing it with just anyone and with multiple women at the same time. What if opportunities to become bigger come up? Would you eventually make it your main job or would you still pursue what youre currently taking up? PPD to me is like people from all forms of dating views and battling it out to see who comes out on top lol. Its definitely entertaining. My eyes have been opened when it came to gender wars ever since I stumbled her…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:17 PM
1

When I first heard about the prevalence of the exclusivity talk I was confused too. It sounds like a technicality people use to get out of "cheating" situations, for a lack of a better term. Well, if you can leverage your good looks to earn money to a reasonable extent I guess why not. Correct me if Im wrong, but it sounds like an easier job compared to traditional part time ones like waiting tables or something. Ahh, observing us average peeps piques your curiosity I see haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 02:42 PM
9

I think theyre trying to create a world view that makes their reality easier to swallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 01:37 PM
9

I think most women are def having lots of sex. Just that taht happens in a monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 01:19 PM
1

I guess youve got a point in saying whats the difference haha. If only most of the dating scene reflects your experience worldwide everything would be a whole lot simpler. Also, I saw in a comment somewhere youre a model. Whats an actual model doing in a debate sub like this lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 01:18 PM
1

Glad we could find some common ground at least. And if I may ask, you said by the second date yall are exclusive. Is that a bf/gf type exclusive or like wont date other people but not yet bf/gf exclusive? No problem. People get really riled up in here and just either expect aggression or display aggression by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:39 PM
1

Well, the US's sphere of influence is vast so you could say that. We consume a lot of American content, to the point where I think its concerning but it is what it is. Im not tryna change your mind lol. Im just saying the world is vast, as well as experiences. Correct me if Im wrong, but youre coming off kinda very in your face-ish. Am i misreading your tone? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 12:18 PM
1

Im not even American, nor am I a westerner haha. And Im not gonna say what is or what isnt actually common, just what Ive read here and heard from others IRL. Maybe make a post here in Reddit qs to get a feel what people think? Or not haha. I also didnt tell you what its like where you are, I just told you that dating multiple people might not be as rare as you think. So if thats your truth, then so be it lol. Mine is that there are enough people who do both that its two normal things that happe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 09:26 AM
1

Yes, but so is your social group. Thats what my last statement was for. We could each find a hundred people that share our view but then a hundred isnt the hundreds of thousands to a million that make up a city. I guess the real answer is both are prevalent enough to be considered the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:44 AM
1

Hey, thats just what Ive been reading on Reddit and people I know. Dont have any friends from other places so you got me on that one. All I know is people often bring up the exclusivity talk in almost all dating advice subs Ive read here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 07:01 PM
1

Maybe our experienced are just shaped by the company we keep. Confirmation bias in action. Reddit doesnt seem to think so though Thats how I do it too. Im a one person at a time guy, but I acknowledge that isnt how most go about dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:42 PM
1

Really? Cus you go on any sub here on Reddit and more than half of them will say that any form of the "exclusivity" talk needs to happen before anything is official. Now I dont adhere to that strictly, but a 2nd date I feel is kinda too early IMO to be exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 03:35 PM
1

I think multi dating is everywhere, though degree may vary deoending on where it is. And about the second dare thing, I think youd find a lot of pushback on that in here. I dont date multiple people at a time personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 10:46 AM
1

Totally agree with what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:43 AM
2

Well, thats their problem. Im framing my preferences against my definitions based on the circumstance of their answers. Simple. And thats yall. That aint me. Im good with what I consider casual or not, ex or not. And I expect nothing less, doesnt mean I wont define it against my definition and then consider if I should take it further or its time to move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:37 PM
1

Eh, guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. Its labelled "just vibes" in my metaphorical playbook though lol. Anyways, good talk. As snarky as you were it was entertaining lolol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:33 PM
1

That is an answer. Let the vibes take you to that convo lol. Dunno, why do you keep replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:30 PM
1

Cus you wouldnt take my answer of "just vibes" lol. Plus I wanted to see how committed you were to rage baiting. You dont make your first reply to my comment like that if you werent lol. Anywayss, glad you gleaned something outta this. Most probs something negative, but it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:21 PM
1

Hey I def get your reasoning for picking Floyd. Dudes the master at the art of boxing. But a tweaked shoulder aint nothing if Im living the life like PacMan. See. Thats how I felt when you kept being snarky and not taking my answers at face value. Like, why so aggressive my guy. How I would implies application in idea, which as I said I went off vibes lol. How I went about implies past instances of application in practice. Its nuance in meaning. I actually got an idea of what you wanted to hesr …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:17 PM
1

Still Manny. Dude seems chill and aint obnoxious like Floyd. Money at that level seems very negligible to me. A difference of a several millions when Im still worth that much is a-okay. Plus they both seem healthy enough. Manny seems more leaner than Floyd though so I'll take the abs and cuts. Well you asked how I would go about it, not how I went about it. Theres a difference lol. For someone so seemingly structured I thought youd be more specific in your question. And I just asked yknow. And t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:05 PM
1

I would rather have Mannys. I like aggressive fighters with a just bring it attitude to boxing. The Ls, lesser net worth and damage dont matter to me because dude still won in the sport at the highest of levels. Plus its not like Mannys accumulated damage is anything significant. He aint a mumbling and crippled mess so its whatever. It has happened, if thats what youre looking for. You shoulda asked for past experiences, not my gameplan lol. And yeah like boxing I took losses in the form of reje…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:47 PM
1

I never said Floyd aint great. Floyd is great. Maybe greater. But PacMan is still great. Floyds greatness isnt slight towards Manny orr any other decorated boxer for that matter. Your Ls only define you if you never bothered to claw your way to a W. And Manny got hella Ws. One mam being greater doesnt make another another not great. You got my answer several comments ago, yet you came at me with very snarky replies because you already had a preconcieved answer you wanted to hear and any other an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:38 PM
1

Manny didnt get KOd during that fight though he lost. But is he not in the GOAT convo though despite his losses? Is he not one of the most decorated boxers ever despite the Ls? Ls happen to everyone and they dont take away from your dubs. Great is great. A win is a win. Youre asking me to come up with an imaginary convo with an imaginary woman just to satisfy you? Thats weird man. I bet thats what you want so you can come up with your own convo that would paint me in a narrative that fits your v…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:27 PM
1

Manny Pacquaio got some nasty KO losses in his resume. Dudes in the GOAT convo still. I dont see how losses prevent you from getting success. Because I told you there is none. Its just vibes. If you like to have a plan before you set out to do something, thats you. Like what Iron Man said to Cap when told they needed a plan of attack in Avengers 1 before duking it out with Thor. "Attack".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:11 PM
1

Deontay power punched his way to heavyweight glory. Its definitely simpler than Mayweathers way. Sure he lost some, but thats just boxing as is life. There is none. I dont plan what I say and attempt to predict what she says and have preplanned responses for each possible response. Thats a dialogue tree. What I have are questions, for which I dont know when will be asked but will definitely be asked at some point in time. Youre being kinda obtuse, but I get it. Youre just waiting for me to slip.…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:03 PM
3

Only neurotic people create dialogue trees and try to steer conversation in that direction intentionally. And like I said idk how and when, but it def will before the exclusivity talk. Its not theoretical, I just dont have a set and structured method to apply it. Its just vibes. And I agree. Thats why theres no well laid out plan. Just what I wanna achieve. You dont necessarily need a plan to say "I wanna win a boxing match". You just gotta punch your way to a win.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:55 PM
4

Idk. But like I said, def before having a convo on if we're exclusive. I'll let the interaction take us to where the topics can be interjected. I get the vibe that youre fishing for an answer so you can start your tirade of snarky comments. Youre baiting me hella hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:41 PM
5

Idk. I dont plan out a convo in my head beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:27 PM
5

Most likely not on the first but def before getting serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:16 PM
2

If thats how you go about it. As for me, it doesnt have to be immediately after we both go exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 11:39 AM
2

Yep. Sex outside a relationship. I dont worry about other meanings aside that one. Complicates things. Not exclusive but dating? Casual sex. Not an ex. Thats what it means to me. You cant give a precise number on committed relationships? Not my problem. Thats why my definition for casual and exes are simple. No complications.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 06:28 AM
1

Why do women style their costumes that way? Is that the only default way to cosplay as a woman? They coul try to be cool or scary or whatever but it always just has to be a "slutty costume here".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:02 AM
3

Then those guys never really held those standards for real. Thats like saying everyone would shoot some stranger for a life changing amount of money. Not everyone is weak willed dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:51 AM
3

I dont ask n counts cus women could just lie about the number. I ask how many exes theyve had, then if they had casual sex before. If they didnt, the # of exes is the possible n count. If yes, you could probably conjure up an approximate depending on your biases. For me, I just dont date women who engage in casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:46 AM
2

Isnt casual sex the same? At least the hooker is getting paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:41 AM
3

Lying is the ultimate equalizer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 02:37 PM
1

Wouldnt want a woman who engage in such activities, so I dont do it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:53 AM
2

Just feels to me like the time and effort to build a connection isnt proportionate. Nothing against women who are like this, but Im asking ASAP and if she is Im moving on to the next one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:32 AM
2

I may not be in the dating market now, but I hope theres a lot more like you for similarly oriented guys like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:26 AM
2

I think its ok though I have avoided women like this when I was dating. It gives me the impression that shes not interested in giving me the same time and effort in building rapport and connection that Im giving her. Im a 1 is to 1 guy, even before all this exclusivity talk technicality is laid out, and I prefer a woman thats the same. Theyre worth the effort anyways, even if it doesnt work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 06:21 AM
1

Damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 06:48 AM
1

Im not saying it aint a compliment to you, but you cant force someone to accept what they think is an insult to them. Just like how some jokes offend people because its not a joke, or a good joke, to them. Maybe its a bad compliment then
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 04:16 PM
0

Maybe because its not a compliment to your intended audience? Intent doesnt negate how the receiver interprets it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 07:56 AM
1

Over the course of getting to know them. Could happen all in 1 convo or spread out over days. If you did, then Id have filtered out women who I wouldnt wanna be with anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 07:37 AM
1

If she doesnt answer, then on to the next one until I find someone whos upfront and go from there. And I agree with the other users comment. Husband material aint a compliment when the woman has a history of sleeping around. Its not a certain schedule, more like if she lets them hit only when theyre in a committed relationship or not. But Imma benl honest and say that if given she had sex with her ex faster than with me and both had been in committed relationships, Id feel some typa way too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:41 AM
1

Maybe they want the women who've always preferred men like or close to them? It might give the impression of "this is who I should date" rather than "this is who I want to date".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:43 AM
5

This reaallyy grinds my gears when I come across it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 06:46 PM
1

Im just saying that not every "___ dick" term is meant to be a compliment. Im not pointing any fingers here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 06:01 PM
3

Small/pencil dick doesnt feel positive to me haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 03:15 PM
–

You got the link to this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:38 PM
–

I addressed that point in my initial comment, so I get that perspective. I agree. Its how men and women view things differently in general because of lived experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:03 AM
–

I know. But men prioritize the physical more in general compare to women. Thats why most men would be more bummed out to hear they are "lesser" in some physical aspect, especially if theyre "lesser" compared to hookup guy. Thats just the man's POV on husband vs hookup material anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:21 AM
5

Guess its because men value sex more than women while women value the intangibles more than sex. If women engage in sex with hookup guy, then its basically giving the signal to husband material that the thing he values most physically is just a throwaway to this potential partner. That hookup guy doesnt need to jump hoops to obtain the husband material's perceived highest form of physical intimacy. Its probably because women are seen sexually often so it diluted their percieved value of physical…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:46 PM
1

I guess guys just value bring valued physically more than those other non tangible traits you mentioned. Its like hearing "He may have been hotter, but youre all these other things too" and thst doesnt fly with most guys. I dont necessarily have the same opinion as OP, but I would admit Id be more bummed out hearing my partner doest find me as physically attractive as her ONS. I probably wouldnt even blink if she said I was less sociable or charming.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:32 PM
4

Or maybe these guys get bitter because theyre struggling and there are guys who do the complete of opposite of what women advise here ("dont be insert negative behavior here) but still be successful with women. Also, when women "want" good guys its often because they know its whats right in a relationship. Its a choice. When women desire a not so good guy its often because of some primal response. Not a choice, but an urge.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 05:51 AM
1

Isnt it common sense that physical attraction comes first when its someone new, other factors come second?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 09:53 AM
5

True, depending on the reason it softens the blow. Would I rather get rocked or knocked out in a fight? On god Id rather get rocked ma G.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:13 AM
7

Id rather women not fuck me cus Im too big than women not fuck me cus Im inadequate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:08 AM
6

So true. Sure, a few women arent comfortable with a big D, but that doesnt stop a lot of women from making it seem like a big D is a blessing/bonus/cherry on top/jackpot kind of thing when getting a man. Youre called blessed if you got that size for crying out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:07 AM
1

80% sounds great to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 04:15 AM
3

It doesnt work as an "approach" because you both arent expecting feelings to escalate into a relationship when you enter a genuine friendship. Its a just happens kind of thing. It fails as an approach because youre inogranically trying to create something from a completely different thing IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 01:53 PM
–

Dont want to be alone with a random dude in the woods but a good number of them find themselves alone fucking a random dude they met hours or minutes earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter