TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ok_Plankton248479 Archive

View 0 posts and 507 comments by Ok_Plankton248479 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Give me a break. I'm sure it's a worry to you.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:04 AM
0

No. Consent has to be ongoing. Consent to sex is not consent to enduring having your body ripped to shreds, just like consent to a kiss is not consent to anything else.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:49 PM
-10

No, it's not the problem. The problem is men who have sex with people they are not married to and create pregnancies. Society does not want that type of man to reproduce. Men do have the "power" to keep their pants zipped up. Stay away from those overpowering strongarm women who force you to give up your sperm against your will. Abortion has nothing to do with parenting. Abortion stops pregnancy and is necessary for many reasons. Men can't have abortions because they are not pregnant. Women ofte…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:35 PM
0

You're a stupid person. Women are severely damaged by pregnancy and birth. You'll learn that when you get through the 2nd grade.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:25 PM
-9

Society is never going to let men just go about screwing people and making offspring that they aren't supporting. It's not in the interest of society for that type of man to reproduce, so no, they're not going to change the law to allow it and force the rest of society to foot the bill. Be more responsible with where you leave your sperm.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 11:14 PM
-10

How exactly is he going to perform his half of "payment" when it's a physical great bodily harm to the body that is garaging it? He can't. So then yes, she gets to put that thing out of her garage. Abortion is always self defense.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 09:39 PM
-2

No one said it's ok.. having an old man taking blades to your genitals Any medical procedure should be done by doctors in careful and sterile environment. No medical procedure should ever be done for religion or belief.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:48 AM
-5

Ask men who've been through it. You're delusional. You and your gross stinky penis. That's why no one likes you.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:39 PM
-2

It's not terrible to remove foreskin. It's necessary to do most of the time. And it's ugly and gross besides.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 10:13 PM
-1

No, the clitoris is EXACTLY the same as the penis. They are the same body part. Removing the foreskin is not at all the same thing as a clitoris, dumbass. And men who have to have that done as adults whine and cry at how bad it is. You're whining about something that doesn't really affect your life.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 09:19 PM
-3

Oh sorry, I thought you could read. That is what I said, dumbass.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 06:40 PM
0

And that's what I said. Cutting off the clitoris would be like cutting off the glans or entire penis, not just a bit of skin of the hood. Dumbass. Learn anatomy.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 06:12 PM
-7

The foreskin is not equivalent to a clitoris. The glans, or entire penis, is equivalent. Learn anatomy.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:01 PM
-1

If she isn't on the same guy, then it proves that whoever made this video is an idiot. That is all.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 10:45 AM
-10

Is she sitting on the same guy? If not, then what's your point? Women are allowed to choose who they want to be with. No one has a right to take that.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:08 AM
1

Non-consent is rape. Rape is rampant in the world. You're probably included in that.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 01:28 PM
1

You're not a woman.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 12:56 PM
0

No, it's not. It's well known that it's a pit of snakes. Far more than 50% of women are rape victims. In some societies where there is arranged marriage, all sexual relations are rape. Non-consent is rape.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:17 AM
-2

A sperm is nothing. It's dead unless a woman saves it and makes it into something. You were made by a woman. Women are gods to you.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:03 AM
-2

No, just a WOMAN made you. The man just left a bit of sperm behind but he did nothing to contribute to actually making you. Nothing. Left some sperm to die. That's it. The woman did all of the work. All of it. Women are the creators.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 01:54 AM
0

A WOMAN made You. Women make all the people. Leaving behind a sperm or two is not doing any of the work to make a person. The sperm literally just dies unless a woman keeps it alive with her own efforts. WOMEN made all humans. They are the real creators of humans.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 11:24 PM
1

Rape is rampant through out the entire history of humans. Whether they punished a select few people for it didn't make it not common. For instance, in current day India it is technically against the law to sexually assault, and yet it is widely known to be rampant there currently. It is extremely common in most of the world right now even though it is illegal.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 10:31 PM
0

Try reading a history book once in your life.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 10:05 PM
-1

Who said they encourage it? Do rapists need encouragement? No. They just rape because they want to dominate and abuse. Frankly you're the stupidest thing I have seen, in that you can't read and comprehend anything.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 09:49 PM
-4

No, it does not. Nothing can compensate for that destruction. Are you mental?
/r/MensRights06/11/21 04:47 PM
-10

Yes, most of them are the product of rape. And no, there will still be a few births that people choose to risk, but it would be a tiny fraction of the ones that occur now. If abortion were freely available, far fewer women would choose birth over abortion.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 02:53 PM
-16

No, it doesn't depend on who is asking. Bearing a child is a complete destruction of the woman's body as it was. She often has no choice because men rape and she cannot effectively get rid of that. Literally any man can impregnate by just producing sperm. It takes nothing of them.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 02:29 PM
-17

Women have value to society because they literally make all the people. That doesn't make the privileged. There is nothing privileged about having to bear a child.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 02:07 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 11:06 AM
1

I'm not arguing. I'm just telling you, and everyone else, so you don't remain in ignorance damaging yourself and the world around you. It's not a debatable topic. It's been studied from every perspective scientifically. You're just wrong. Carry on being wrong. But others who may come across the information might look it up and save themselves from the disaster that it brings.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 10:22 AM
1

All of what?
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:12 AM
0

Sorry for you.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:01 PM
1

It destroys people's live as much as any of those things, and leads to those things. It should be stopped and young people should be taught the danger instead of being told that it's harmless. It's the biggest predictor of a horrible sad future.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:40 PM
1

You think that segregation of the degenerates doesn't work out, but it's the reason we have prisons, so civilized people can live in peace.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:22 PM
1

You're just not intelligent or educated enough to even understand what you're saying. How are you going to understand what someone else says? I can't expect that of you.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:46 PM
-2

No one chooses that in free will.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:12 PM
0

It does actually. It harms men by making them unsuitable lovers and family men, which is shown to shorten their lives and make them extremely unhappy.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 05:09 PM
-1

Religion is misogyny. It is another example of men abusing women.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:01 PM
-3

Porn destroys families and society. It creates monstrous filthy men who are no good for anything.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:30 PM
0

So you're saying people who watch porn should be punished by segregation? That would be an awesome world. Get the degenerate filth out so everyone else can live nicely with each other. People who watch porn aren't a problem, you can barley tell the difference between ones who do and ones who don't, and prison? Wrong! Everyone can tell because of their warped mind and behavior. It's broadcast to the world and they behave like monsters.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:18 PM
-19

Yes, I did show you. They're not "empowered" by being used by men in disgusting and disrespectful ways. It's a mental disfigurement that they don't understand because they've been brainwashed by abusers.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 02:02 PM
-2

Well that's a dumb argument. Porn directly abuses women.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:51 PM
-22

Yes. And they are playing to misogynists in order to get money.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:22 PM
-3

It's harmful to people even if they don't watch it because it warps the mind of those that do and they still exist in the world. If they were kept completely separate, as in a prison or something, then it wouldn't affect everyone else. But it does.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:06 PM
-55

She's right. Explain how porn is not misogynistic. It clearly is. And so are people who watch it.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:14 PM
1

No, you're ignorant and whiny. Oh poor me, I'm a man and it's so hard that men do bad things and then society treats them like they did bad things. Knock it off. Get a life.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:27 PM
1

It's not the same service. Vehicle insurance is specific to the risk of the individual based on the characteristics of said individual and based on extensive math. Men are significantly higher risk to insure than women are. They have distinct habits and behaviors.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:11 PM
0

Get some degrees. I don't have to teach you anything. You're just ignorant and you can't refute that.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:51 PM
1

The only "facts" you presented is that you're worshiping a criminal.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:05 PM
1

It's not my fault that you choose to be uneducated and ignorant. Or that you're unintelligent.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 04:52 PM
0

Right. It's fraud. They aren't less risk. They are lying to defraud the insurance company. It does matter whether they are male or female because males are higher risk as demonstrated by math over decades. I'm an expert in this. You're not going to make a point here. It's not "shown above" by some illiterate who has no education on the topic and is incorrectly asserting it as fact.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 04:41 PM
0

ponctuation
/r/MensRights30/10/21 04:22 PM
-4

Ya, some guy committed fraud to defraud the insurance company. They can deny his claims if he gets caught at it. Do you think insurance companies don't investigate people's life and habits? If he has an at fault crash and investigation can ultimately lead to criminal charges for insurance fraud.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:50 PM
0

Guaranteed I'm 1000 times more intelligent than you if you think an insurance company isn't calculating risk accurately.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:29 PM
-9

They don't. If they did, insurance companies would be the first to know and the first to hike prices for them. You're not intelligent enough to be an actuary, which is why your opinion on the matter is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:30 PM
-21

Men are more aggressive in general. Actuarial analysts know their math better than you do.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:42 AM
1

That's extremely unprofessional of her. Wow. And yes, luckily someone spoke up. Please don't let this embarrass you further. I know that you have it in your head that everyone thinks it, or thinks about it, but it was pointed out that she's wrong, and most likely most people agree. Particularly people who are workers under her level. If I had seen such an interaction, I would have thought the "higher up" was completely in the wrong. I've heard of some pretty bad behavior around an office and I'v…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:53 PM
1

Who cares? He's a child abusing drunk. I don't care. It think the govt is right to protect kids from abusers like that.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 12:11 AM
1

It wasn't. He can go get his own test if he thinks it's wrong.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:06 PM
1

So what. Why should children have to risk their lives for this piece of crap.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 09:48 PM
1

He's flunking the tests obviously. It doesn't matter how many times he wants to be tested. If he flunked once, he's a danger to the kids. He's most likely a danger for multiple reasons which is why they are protecting kids from his psycho ass. You don't get to abuse kids just because you donated sperm.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 03:50 PM
0

No, it would be harassment and a waste to test again once he's not passed. He's not going to be over it in 4 months. Children should be protected from him. Why do you think children should be abused and have to have their lives destroyed by this monster.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 10:51 PM
1

No woman has ever made an embryo without a man forcing it. Men at fault.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 05:16 PM
-1

It seems that you are delusional. People can accuse all they want. A court doesn't just accept that at face value.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:22 PM
-3

He's lying because they don't just randomly order that without proof. He's an alcoholic abuser and you're defending him abusing boys. Boys deserve protection from monsters.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 04:37 PM
-22

Doubtful that he was falsely accused. They don't just take someone's word. He's a liar. They wouldn't be continuing to test him if he was clean the first time.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:39 PM
-19

The government is trying to protect them and you're complaining about that protection. The govt isn't randomly selecting people to monitor. You're absurd to think that they are going to interfere on the say so of some random person. No one is buying this crap. You sound like a dindunuffin.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:07 PM
-15

Do you think boys should be subjected to abuse from a drunken parent? Or protected? What do you think laws should do to protect boys from abuse?
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:35 PM
1

Yes, it does. I'm looking at you.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 01:30 PM
1

Men sit on their asses half the day. Women work the whole 24 hours. You seem to have a hard time following the thread here.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 01:22 AM
1

You're dumb. Follow along in the conversation.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 01:01 AM
1

Boys just assume women are magic and all their work gets done by some sort of spell. They never count the hours that all that work takes to do.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 12:20 AM
0

That's exactly what you're trying to do, but it doesn't work because we all live in reality where women do all the work.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 12:01 AM
-2

You're just making up nonsense. Women do the vast majority of childcare around the world. Your mom raised you. Women do not sleep more than men. Men rarely do housework at all or any sort of work off the clock.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:46 PM
-12

No they're not. Men get sleep time, even when they are fathers. And they rarely do housework on their hours away from paid jobs.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:06 PM
-17

Real life buddy. Women work 24/7 with no breaks. They're on call even when they're asleep. Men don't. The rare man that is a single father might. But those are few in comparison to women who do child care and home making. Men just don't consider that work when they are counting.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 08:32 PM
-20

LOL. That's a complete lie.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 04:24 PM
14

Wrong. He hit her first while she was sitting at the stop light. There is more video than this edited version.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 02:52 PM
0

Because it's not the same act, and it's not the same law. How is that confusing. Words have meanings and specifically legal words have meanings defined by the law in the jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 02:42 PM
0

How can I proof her wrong? Go to law school. Then you'll know. And what rights are you fighting for that you think men don't already have?As to the conflict between your parents, you can't possibly know what actually went on between them, any more than your mom knows what you do in your personal relationships. Going to law school is your best option to understand laws.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 05:02 PM
-1

I don't have to. The law defines what rape is.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:39 PM
-2

Ok. And what's your point here? You're proving the OP wrong.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:15 PM
-6

No. Stupid. It's because Rape is not the correct thing to call it. It has nothing to do with gender. Learn words.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:21 AM
-9

No, they still call it what the charges are based on the statute.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 08:44 PM
-11

Because rape is not the correct thing to call it. https://www.findlaw.com/state/florida-law/florida-rape-laws.html
/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:36 PM
2

You're treating men as subhuman and unable to make better life choices or love someone.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:05 PM
-2

Nope. I know far more than you, about just about any topic, including this one. Go cry.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:34 PM
-2

You can't keep them hostage. You be a good loving husband and choose wisely someone that loves you. I have never met someone who filed for divorce and said their husband was perfect. There was always a reason that led up to it.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:12 AM
-1

I know far more than you do. I doubt you've ever read your own statute on the topic.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:58 AM
1

He cheater on the mother of his child. That alone makes him an abuser to the child. Yes, he's automatically wrong.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:54 PM
0

No, a good father cares for the mother first and therefore provides a loving and stable life for a child. You can't care about your child and treat their mother badly. You're damaging the child. Go ask a few kids who grew up that way.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:52 PM
2

But your argument would be wrong. My children are perfect. Children should not be left with a corrupt and contemptible person. Someone who cheats on their spouse is unfit to parent. They should have two loving parents.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 06:48 PM
-2

Nowhere was that implied. The comment is entirely about men and their choices.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 06:09 PM
-8

women are being paid to break the legal contract that is marriage bull. they are not. women by far get much less than their share in divorce court. If they are leaving, it is because the man didn't live up to something.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:43 PM
-10

She wouldn't be filing if you were a good husband. If she was a bad person, you shouldn't have chosen her.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:41 PM
-16

Why can't you be good husbands and then you won't have this problem?
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:03 PM
0

No, based on the scenario, he's hurting the child. He's an abuser. To her, and to the child. He should not be allowed to raise a child. And no, I'm not going to agree with you. Your opinion is wrong and demonstrated to be child abuse.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:49 PM
-1

No, she's doing it protectively. A good father loves the mother first. That is what provides the emotional home for a child. He is not a good father unless he does that first, before sex. He's a shitty father and a shitty person.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:23 PM
-3

He is still a scummy shitty cheater though. And therefore not a good father. A good father loves the mother of his child. He should not get the child for that reason alone. She's doing the right thing by keeping the child away from him however she can. The world would be better if every child had two good parents. Kids aren't pets.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 01:14 PM
-4

There's no child if she aborts. He doesn't own her.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 12:57 PM
2

she doesn't have to be an incubator for him. she should just abort. i can understand why she doesn't want to be tied to him forever.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:24 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:12 PM
0

I'd swear you were here to make men look bad. Fortunately I know that most men aren't like you.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 08:44 PM
0

I've shown my concern for your safety and you've shown that you're a liar and an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:49 PM
-4

No, the witness is who saw the start. The police interviews did nothing to contradict what the witness saw. It's you that doesn't really understand how these things go down. But the police should. They're supposed to be educated about victim behaviors. I'm not arguing that they were required to arrest either of them. But once the investigation was done, HE would have been charged. That never happened because he escalated to murder, which often happens when the victim is intimidated by police lik…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:24 PM
1

You think the eye witnesses didn't know which one was bald and which one had long blond hair? And yes, emotional behavior is reliable if you know what you're looking at. It is a tell that people can't control.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:05 PM
0

There were witnesses that saw him hitting her "all up and down the street". And yes, emotional behavior is evidence.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:44 PM
-3

The police "concluded" that because they didn't have the correct information. THERE WAS A WITNESS THAT SAW HIM HITTING HER. The aggressor is him, because he was hitting her and in the end she defended her life and getting back into her own vehicle and phone. He would have been charged with that information.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:32 PM
1

You mean that you're a huge liar about being abused? Do you think all men lie about being abused or is it just you?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:22 PM
-2

And any arrest or citation would have been invalidated if they had listened to the 911 caller who said he was hitting her first. Then he would have been charged.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:02 PM
-7

You're not very smart. And you didn't bother looking at evidence.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:52 PM
-19

And yet it turns out HE was the aggressor all along and they didn't have complete information about the report that HE was hitting her up and down the street FIRST. But anyone with training would have been able to see this purely based on their emotional behavior.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:08 PM
-1

Are you in danger? Do you need help?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 03:56 PM
0

Are you in danger? You need to explain your situation if you want help. Answer the question. Why can't you get out of your situation? And I have no idea what any of this has to do with "combat roles" and I'm not going off on your delusional rift.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:56 PM
0

I'm sorry you're dumb.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 02:44 PM
1

I asked you what violence YOU are experiencing. Are you with Amber right now? Do you need someone to send the police? You just keep on making whiny statements that have no meaning. Either clarify the danger you are in, or just shut up. Either you have something real to say, or you don't. Nobody has time for your pussy footing around here.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:04 PM
1

The question was, "should men be allowed to hit women". The answer is no. No one is allowed to hit anyone. You seem to have a lot of difficulty understanding the English language.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:14 PM
0

Use your words better. You're not explaining your situation. What is happening to you that you can't escape?
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:50 AM
0

No, I didn't miss that part. If you are able to type on the internet, then you are able to call the police. How tiny are you in comparison to her? What is preventing you from leaving? Are you tied up?
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:16 AM
0

How is she preventing you from leaving? You have access to internet. Call the police.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:05 AM
0

Explain what is stopping you from leaving in one piece?
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:44 AM
0

You don't need to beat someone to defend yourself. Learn the difference. Men should not be hit.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:11 AM
0

Everyone has a right to use an amount of force necessary to defend themselves from injury. Beyond that, no.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 10:50 PM
-4

No.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:57 PM
2

"The youngsters.. " lol. They're not youngsters if they have facial hair. It's a reasonable restriction if it is causing problems with violence.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:00 PM
-1

Over a report? What quick search is that? Show me if you have that. They why didn't you post it.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 10:57 PM
-3

If it's found out during investigation, it's dropped. Idk where you are that men are losing jobs over a report. It's not happening anywhere around me. And "hundreds" of instances? Where are you exactly? There are millions of rapes in a year. The vast majority aren't reported. The vast majority are by husbands or boyfriends and are almost never prosecuted.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:30 PM
-8

A complete fabrication is easy to disprove. Do you actually think that someone comes in, says so-and-so raped me, and they go "oh ok". No they investigate. Ask the details over and over. Have a rape exam done to look for evidence. Ask about witnesses before, after, during, etc. It's a criminal investigation like any other. It's incredibly traumatic.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:06 AM
1

The law agrees with me. That's what matters. Stop avoiding the question. You claim you have some proof. Where is it.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:27 PM
0

I don't know why you're arguing over this. We have laws. That's not the punishment prescribed by law for this crime. Go educate yourself and read the law on sexual assault. Stop making dumb comments.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:15 PM
1

Nonsense. I don't hate men at all. Quite the contrary. You're just immersed in your woman hatred and can't see that other men aren't like you. Also, you haven't answered the question why you think I have more accounts. Apparently the fact that lots of people agree with me is your only proof of that.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:04 PM
1

So far you've just mentioned your delusions. What's the "much more"?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:08 PM
0

I don't know why you're arguing over this. We have laws. That's not the punishment prescribed by law for this crime. Go educate yourself and read the law on sexual assault. Stop making dumb comments.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:38 PM
1

No, I'm asking you why you think I have multiple accounts and what you claim is "proof".
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:28 PM
1

Go read the law. Why are you arguing when you haven't read the statute.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:18 PM
-1

You're a criminal when you commit a crime whether you're caught or not.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:07 PM
1

You're wrong. I don't know why you even think that. What basis are you linking accounts. And men only feel bad if they are bad. Men aren't inherently bad. But quite a few are drawn to this sub.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:56 PM
2

You're wrong.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:45 PM
1

People are not "resilient". Things that happen to them in childhood last their whole life and affect everything from there on. Nobody truly gets over being abused. It's important for young people to know this before they abuse someone. You're too far beyond that to help. Now you're trying to cover up your guilty. But others can still be stopped.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:33 PM
3

Really. Did he deny it? No. He's the criminal.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:23 PM
1

I called him that because he thinks sexual assault should be legal. That makes him that. Anyone who thinks sexual assault is ok is scum. And what's a last account? I have no other account. Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:10 PM
1

So no problem then. Charge the crime. Have the trial.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:59 PM
3

Exactly. And sexual assault is still a crime.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 03:02 PM
2

The criminal should face criminal penalties. That's the answer.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:51 PM
3

There is a law because it harms people. Do you think it should not be against the law for me to bash you in the face, or shoot you? Fucking disgusting prick.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:41 PM
5

Sexually assaulting someone is not a mistake. He knew by this time that it's a criminal act. He should be charged appropriately. There is no reason it should haunt him for the rest of his life. The victims are haunted and affected for the rest of their lives. Why are you focused on the effect to the criminal and not the victim? The victim goes on to have this affect all of their future relationships including romantic and business. It damages their ability to be around men. It has an enormous im…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:29 PM
1

This all made me laugh out loud.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:55 PM
-6

That isn't true. Testimony is evidence. Yes, people are convicted of things other than rape, by testimony of a victim or witness.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:15 PM
-12

Yes, you charge the criminal with the crime, and then have a trial and ask the victim to testify to what happened. And the criminal gets to tell their side. And if what happened is a crime, which in this case it is, then there is a punishment as listed in the law.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:54 PM
-29

Why would society want to make things easier to be a criminal?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:42 PM
-27

Sexual assault is a crime. Yes, you're like a Brock Turner supporter if you're excusing sexual assault and saying the penalties of the law shouldn't apply because "his future". His future is going to be that he continues to abuse girls and women the rest of his life unless he's taught a severe lesson that is dictated by law. We don't write laws for no reason. They are expected to be followed.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:31 PM
-20

No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:13 PM
4

Why shouldn't he have a criminal record? It's a criminal sexual assault. He is plenty old enough to know not to sexually assault anyone. No, he shouldn't be given a pass and neither should anyone else. It's completely unacceptable to sexually assault people and the sooner people get that straight, the better society will be.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:57 AM
0

Oh I'm sure everyone is wrong and just this one guy is right. Ya, that seems logical. Not.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:42 AM
-23

he must be a creep if everyone is telling you he's a creep.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 11:44 PM
-6

never heard of him.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 11:03 PM
1

Yes, men should be talking to other men about this issue, because the more times people hear the victimhood and then the real story isn't that, it damages men who are real victims. People turn off listening and just assume he's the same story again. Probably lazy or cheating or some other bum way, when that might not be the truth at all.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:57 PM
-3

Exactly. And as the post points out, it's usually initiated by the woman side so something is wrong more often on the man side that the woman is unhappy about. If you listen to what the complaints are about, it's often routine things like he's not doing his share of work taking care of things, dumping the whole load onto her. She's better off without having that extra big child. Just don't be that. Women are begging for good husbands that will do their share and be a partner. Also, be more selec…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:16 PM
-47

Most divorces can be avoided by being a better husband. Pay attention to what needs to be done in the joint effort. I've spoken to a lot of divorced men who claim victimhood, but when they explain the whole situation, it is clear that they were not doing their part.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 07:02 AM
1

I'm not saying that should be taught as the only prevention. You're upset that you might have to pay for your actions and I'm saying that is completely within your control. Don't have sex with someone you haven't sorted this out with and developed a relationship with. Society isn't going to pay for your mistakes. You do know how to avoid them. Society does not want you to reproduce more than you can support yourself. We're not going to pay for your sex. "My rhetoric" is what the law is based on …
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:08 PM
0

Abstinence does. Discuss pregnancy before you have sex anyway. You should know this in advance. It's not a surprise.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:09 PM
0

They obviously are not in control of all things reproductive. You're in control of you. They're not making you have sex. Especially unprotected sex.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:40 PM
0

No one is ever going to agree to that and make it law. It's not in society's best interest for men to impregnate women and not raise the child. So there is going to be consequence for it. Pretty heavy consequence that he will have to pay for it, or go to jail so he doesn't do it again.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 07:29 PM
0

You don't have to be part of the child's life, that's one aspect. But you will still owe your part financially because society shouldn't have to pick up the bill for your sex. It's not about a medical condition then. It's about what you owe everyone for the choice you made to have sex. She's still going to have to deal with being pregnant one way or another. That's a medical condition which is going to require medical treatment of one degree or another.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:15 PM
0

No, it's not the same thing. Once the child is in society, someone has to pay for it. It's a debt to society for the parents to do that. Both will continue to be required to pay for that financially. That's never going away. The choice men have is to not leave their sperm behind when they don't want to create a baby. Just like if you already have a baby, you don't leave it at a daycare, or mall, or anywhere, without making arrangements for care first. It's really the same thing as that. The choi…
/r/MensRights04/09/21 04:27 PM
2

Same goes if she wants the man to get the vasectomy, or maybe castration, but he's opposed to that. She can tell him that, no one is stopping her speech, but she sure as heck cannot decide that for him.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:41 PM
-4

It's her body that carries the pregnancy, or not. That's her choice to choose the use of her body. He can certainly voice his opinion, and should. But the actual decision is up to her.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:03 AM
1

I have. Stop lying. They wouldn't be panicking and attempting to leave their countries if they were fine. Use your brain. No one wants to be held captive as sex slaves and work slaves the way they are.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:14 PM
1

Muslim culture treats women as second class (or tenth) and abuses them openly. So for starters there is that. The society does not work "very well" for them, ever. There is much wrong with their beliefs which invade their entire culture and prevent them from living in a civilized and progressive manner. You can refer to it as propaganda, but the proof is there for all to see with their own eyes. They don't deny it either.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 03:15 PM
1

So... you're saying the people themselves are inherently bad and unable to live as civilized humans? Then why save them at all? Why bring them to other lands to perpetuate their horrific ignorance? Or are some capable of assimilating into society and leaving that behind? But leave it behind they must. We can't have that trojan horse.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 07:58 AM
1

Our governments are simply unwilling to get rid of the religion. That is the entire basis if the trouble. All of it.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 01:57 AM
3

What is the solution. Unless the west takes over the country completely, it will never be eradicated. As long as the beliefs are allowed to exist, this sickness will persist.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:38 PM
1

Girls are raped 50x more often than boys.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 08:10 PM
0

No, it's not. It's about kids being beaten in school. Just because some weirdo tried to divert it to some rant doesn't mean it's about that rant at all. It's about school children. Follow along.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:12 PM
0

You have no point. The post is about paddling children in school.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:49 PM
-1

I don't know how you don't get it that I DON'T CARE ABOUT UK LAW? And it has nothing to do with this post. How dense are you. You need to go back to year 0.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:23 PM
0

And is that why boys are paddled more than girls?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:50 PM
1

Right. That's the real answer. Parents should be pressing for this to be ended. There is no reason a school employee should be committing child abuse and getting away with it.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:29 PM
-3

What does it have to do with Texas school children?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:08 AM
0

You're the moron who starts blathering on about some random thing that has nothing to do with the post. Are you having a stroke? Go have it somewhere else.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:44 AM
0

SHUT UP you're a fucing disgrace to the concept of intelligence.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:21 AM
0

Well you don't even have the intelligence of a fucking floor. You're ranting off topic to someone who doesn't give a flying fuc about your issue and you keep on doing it even after you're told to shut up.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:11 AM
0

You haven't made any point dumb fuck. Shut up and go cry. I don't care about you.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:00 AM
0

Why are you off on this tantrum? It has nothing to do with the post. If you think UK law should be changed, then propose that to people who can change the law. So far, you're unconvincing that the law is wrong. Penetration is the worst form of sexual abuse there is. It's not the same to just be molested.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:33 AM
-1

And they do. When a woman penetrates a man's body against his will, they have the same penalty.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:21 AM
-2

No, you said men can't be raped. They can. Women can't stick their penis into a man because they don't have one. You're very confused here about the violence of rape. And if the law defines a crime, then it does. It's not gendered just because you want to play victim. Men don't get pregnant or give birth either. I suppose you're going to say that's unfair as well.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:01 AM
-32

No, you're still wrong. And very confused.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:39 AM
2

Girls just have to be more secretive and not tell the man at all. Or anyone else they can't fully trust. It's Texas, so at least they do have access to pills in private so they can't really be forced to stay pregnant unless they are really kept prisoners by someone. Some girls will die of course. But that's to be expected. And they probably would have died in childbirth anyway. And at the very least they would have been permanently disabled. But being dead is better than being forced to give bir…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:26 AM
-16

Men can be penetrated. By a penis, if that is the definition. They are not excluded from being raped.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:16 AM
-5

And? Where in your statement does that exclude men from being victims? Men can be penetrated, ie raped.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:02 AM
-44

Men can be raped. Where did you get the idea that they can't. You're misinformed. About most things apparently.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:21 PM
-69

Why is anyone getting paddled? Just follow the rules of society and behave and that won't happen. Are they paddling them for no reason? What is the reason?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:34 PM
0

It's a category of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:03 PM
0

And how are you still confused? Rape is a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:32 PM
2

It is sexual assault yes. How is this confusing to you. Rape is one form of sexual assault which is the most extreme because it invades someone's body. It does physical damage to them.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:49 PM
0

What? Forcing someone to have sex they didn't consent to is always sexual assault. In the first or second degree. It's a felony.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:47 PM
-17

I don't know the scenario you are thinking of or how that occurs. It is a sexual assault. But yes, most people understand that having something shoved inside your body and damaging your insides is a worse trauma than simply being assaulted externally.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:48 AM
-17

Sexual assault includes rape. But yes, rape is penetration.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 12:16 AM
1

Really? Where in the world are children mostly raised by men? Nowhere.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:56 PM
0

And that's their own fault then. It's not the fault of outsiders. And outsiders shouldn't risk their lives to save any of them. Let them kill each other and save the rest of the world from them.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:34 PM
1

Are these people still muslims? Are they actively trying to eliminate those insane beliefs? They're all complicit in their fate. The outside world didn't do that to them. The whole region is complicit. Why should the outside care about it if they are killing each other. It's not the fault of the USA and the citizens of USA are not responsible to put their lives at risk to save people who won't save themselves.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:02 PM
1

Little kids can be taught to ignore religion.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 10:57 AM
-2

You are misinterpreting
/r/MensRights16/08/21 10:44 AM
1

What are you high on. No, it wasn't at all. "feminists" don't want supremacy over men in the world. They just want equal and fair treatment. You're the idiot that said women were getting away with rape and such. So now the taliban is women? Gather together a couple brain cells and see if you can get them to work.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:45 AM
5

You are correct. The USA shouldn't have done what they did. It seems the current admin isn't really handling things very well for anyone. In many ways it's worse than the last one. A whole different set of wrong thinking.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:29 AM
-3

And you're worried that Afganistan is going to be overrun with women rapists. Are you insane?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 12:41 AM
-16

What are they "getting away with"? You mean wearing pants and getting more education than you?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 12:14 AM
-35

You have no point. You're a moron. You have no brain.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:17 PM
-62

You're an idiot. You have no brain. There is nothing wrong with women being equal to men. You're just inferior in general, so you're afraid of women.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:02 PM
-73

Pretty much everyone is superior to you. Go cry big baby.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:11 PM
4

You're not one of us. You're one of the animals. Gross. There's a reason people are trying to escape you. I'm sure women of the world will be flocking there for education and the fat belly men. /s
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:36 PM
3

I get the feeling that you're one of them. Weirdo.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:08 PM
2

A building doesn't make an education. They're not taught anything other than slave work. You must be a cretin to be defending the taliban rapists. They need to be banished from the earth.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:22 PM
0

Nope, that's you again, incel.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:12 PM
3

Their parents made them. And their parents before them. This isn't a one generation sickness. It is very old. Why would they be in refugee camps if they had built a civilized society. It's their own fault and there is no reason to save any of them. We can populate the earth just fine without any of these people dragging us down with their endless war and religious insanity.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:02 PM
9

Girls are forbidden from education under the taliban. The women are treated like slaves.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:41 PM
8

The women raised the kids. They should have raised them better. My kids aren't terrorists. So... obviously I figured out how to raise men who aren't terrorists, or crazed religious lunatics. Reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:12 PM
5

That's a flat out lie.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:51 PM
12

You seem to be the one who can't follow logic. The women raised the kids who became these men. They should have raised them better. And now you think they should be brought to another part of the world to recreate this same mess? How is that confusing to you?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:24 PM
0

Nah. It's only you that can't find a partner.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:40 PM
17

Women mostly raised the men and made them the way they are. I agree that the women should not be allowed to escape what they foisted on the world. They should have to live in the mess they made. They should have made better choices.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:15 PM
-5

Yes, and? There is no indication of that in this video. And the idiot doing the video suggests that the mother with custody should just let the kid go to someone else when the COURT has given her the responsibility for this kid. It's illegal. The man is an idiot. Follow the law.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:24 AM
-6

Prove it.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 01:36 AM
-11

Nobody is forcing you to. You're free to leave. You're probably a father of kids you left behind and didn't support so you're used to it.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 12:42 AM
-24

This dweeb is just generalizing bs. Yes, kids do better when men step up and act like decent fathers. But you can't make them be decent fathers. And generalizing about this woman is stupid. She no doubt has a court ordered responsibility to the kid. She doesn't get to just hand the kid off when the court decided that's not best. And the guy IS acting like a child. Why would anyone give their child to this manchild. Make your case in court and stop whining.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 06:19 PM
0

yes. does op get paid for making stuff up out of thin air and then including everyone else into his fantasy?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:44 AM
1

shut up
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:33 AM
-1

You're nuts.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:15 AM
-5

You're the troll claiming something that never happened.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:59 PM
-5

"Andrew Cuomo throws ALL MEN UNDER THE BUS. Trying to blame his disgusting molesting behavior on the patriarchy. You cannot make this stuff up. UNREAL. " I'm commenting on what OP said. He did not.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:20 PM
-15

Why are you? Nothing he said was blaming all men. Or any men actually. He claimed he did nothing.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:44 PM
-12

he said a lot of nothing. but i don't see him blaming all men for anything either.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:06 PM
-5

No he didn't. Where?
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:52 PM
1

Wrong!. And you're not married before god either. you're not a christian at all. you're a heathen. now you're online asking how you can get access to children to abuse.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:57 PM
1

You did this on purpose?! What the hell is wrong with you. Just stop with your bullshit "christian" nonsense because christians get married before they knock someone up. You're an abuser. Stop whining to me.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:20 PM
1

You didn't bother to marry her.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 09:49 PM
1

You knew her before you got her pregnant. You didn't marry her. I wouldn't bet on getting custody if I were you because you show that you have poor judgment. The courts aren't going to favor you here.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 09:23 PM
1

Then you have no issue. You did this with full knowledge of her conditions, so claiming after the fact that it was a surprise to you, won't get you anywhere in court. She's going to be abusing this kid, and you're complicit and an accomplice to child abuse.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 08:58 PM
1

You're married? You don't get equal rights unless you married her first. You're already proven yourself to have questionable parenting. It's not as simple as you make it out. You're intentionally creating a nightmare life for this new person. I hope for it's sake that she miscarries. Poor kid.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 08:33 PM
2

Then you're a child abuser. Good luck with that. You are going to create another disaster of a person and nothing you can do will change that outcome. Stop asking for advice when you're clearly not going to do anything rational. She's going to get primary custody and you're not. You have no basis and cannot show the court that you're the rational one, because you're not.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:07 PM
2

It's not a child if she's only 2 months in. It's a tiny speck of a blob that you wouldn't even be able to find. It has no emotions. It doesn't want to live the life you're presenting it with. It is religious nonsense. You're clinging to religious nonsense to justify the child abuse you intend to commit.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:45 PM
2

Abortion is the best solution. Don't create this into a child. You are both a mess from your own description. Hopefully she will have a miscarriage. The religious nonsense you spew is not going to go over well in court.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:18 PM
0

No, get off my comment and go make your own. Get lost. Your blather has nothing to do with what I said.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 02:49 AM
0

Who cares? The op doesn't care. It has nothing to do with his question.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 02:11 AM
0

It's irrelevant how op knows it. But he has said that he's heard it from multiple sources.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:21 AM
3

op said they did know the ex to be an abuser. But it can be both. It's not just one sided.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:53 PM
12

7 months away? Abort it. What are you doing having a kid with someone like that? Her dna is going to be in it, and she'll have contact even if you get custody. Talk her into abortion and leave her. No kid should be born into that mess and the two she already has should be taken away unless she gets parenting classes and counseling/anger management. It's one thing to fight back in defense and quite another to be just another abuser. The fact that her ex is an abuser doesn't negate that she is als…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:23 PM
1

I'm an expert on the legislation. It's you that's dumb.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:46 PM
1

No fault simply means they don't have to jump through the hoops of proving fault. Assets are divided according to the statutes which means she's entitled to over half of everything they have, plus maintenance.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:07 PM
1

Did he? Yes, he has said so publicly. Why do you keep ranting on about something you obviously know nothing about. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:46 PM
1

So you're continuing to prove that you are an idiot. You have no knowledge of law, nor of relationships. No fault divorce refers to the stipulation that they don't have to prove fault in order to be divorced. We know that Bill cheated because he said so. He made the contract to share everything with her when he got married. The statutes define both marriage and marital property. He promised her everything he had in exchange for her youth. He took her youth and used it. Now he owes her everything…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:16 AM
1

Go read the statutes. Stop talking like an idiot.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:43 PM
1

Every time you write some crap again it give a notification. She deserve ALL of it because he took her life from her. HE CHEATED. He broke the marriage. He promised her a lifetime of love and he did not deliver.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:41 PM
1

Not only was she an executive in the partnership, she gave him her youth with the promise that he would be true to her and only her. When he can turn back time and give her her life back, then he's off the hook.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:03 PM
1

How many times are you going to rant on this. Stay mad weirdo.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:35 PM
1

What a sheltered life you lead if you are unaware that you are a rapist if you take advantage of that drunk girl and have sex with her anyway.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:32 PM
1

He cheated on her. When he got married in a marital property state, and chose to live and work in a marital property state, he was well aware of the laws regarding marital assets and contributions to the marriage partnership. When he got married and said vows and promised to be only with her, and to share everything in his life with her, And all the other stuff he promised at that time, he was making a contract and he knew the laws regarding marital property and the laws regarding marital partne…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:13 PM
1

A man should not have sex with anyone. Not in today's society of toxic feminism. So we have found some agreement. Correct. He shouldn't. Unless he's married and both are in love. But your misandry is showing when you keep insisting that the man — and only the man — has done something wrong when both man and woman are drunk. She is having sex with a drunk man: how is she not guilty of as heinous a crime? I've already explained this. And you keep skirting the issue of consent when her entire objec…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 03:01 PM
1

Being intoxicated means there is no consent. Period. So then look at what happened. What was the sex? Did the man do it to her? Then he's the rapist. Or did he not participate and she did everything. A man should not have sex with a drunk person ever. Duh. I can't believe that still needs to be said after all this time.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:15 PM
1

Being intoxicated means there is no consent to what someone does to you. The person who has something done to them is the victim. You can figure out the situations and who then is having something done to them. The usual situation is the girl is having something done to them. The unusual, but not unheard of, situation, is the boy is having something done to them. It's really not as difficult as you're trying to make it, and you know it. Or you aren't smart enough to know it, I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 12:29 PM
2

No, the drop off centers are so they can sell the baby to the highest profit center. The father is cut out. In this case, she would continue the pregnancy for him only. But that's not allowed.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 12:17 PM
1

Yes, they are dissatisfied because the partner isn't keeping up their end of the contract.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:55 AM
1

He knew the marriage contract when he signed up. All earnings are marital property and owned 50/50. I think you should read the law.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:36 AM
1

If both people are intoxicated, it comes down to the details of what happened and who did what to whom. I'm sure you can figure it out.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:43 PM
-2

It's really not. People think that rape is only a forceful act and do not consider that it's rape when they do not get consent that is legal and given freely without coercion or any sort of false pretense. They still raped even if they think they did not.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:20 PM
4

What's the list of things wrong with it. The only thing I see is the age of the man that is doing this.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 05:57 PM
-5

Most people deny that they raped. That doesn't mean it was false. It means they are in denial about what they did, or they misunderstand consent. People who have sex with someone drunk for instance, have had sex without consent. That's a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 04:48 PM
1

Go read the laws. Get some sort of education.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 07:51 AM
1

Gates new the contract when he signed it. I already said I don't know anything about Adele's situation or even where she got married.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:49 PM
1

Ok, you're just too stupid to explain this to. No, your lawyer didn't lie to you, assuming you're in a no fault state, it's not an element in divorce. But it is an element of the civil contract of marriage. You're not very bright. Stop talking to me. I'm not explaining this to you when you're obviously being obtuse and deliberately stupid about the obligations of marriage.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:58 PM
1

Adultery breaks the marriage contract under the law, yes. Whether it is also a crime or not is irrelevant. It is a civil violation of the marriage statues and cause for divorce which is a civil contract. You're dumb.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:16 PM
1

You're just dumb. And wrong. Idiot.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:59 PM
1

Yes, there is a legal contract. The statutes spell it out. Hence the need for divorce. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:31 PM
1

No, all of that is incorrect. He didn't even write windows. He stole it. And the vast majority of their money they made from her work and after they were together. He didn't do the work. She did. And she also made children and family for him. She's contributed the greater share of the relationship. She should get all of the money.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:02 PM
1

And they are getting divorced because HE broke the contract. Her contributions were greater than his.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:51 PM
-1

Marriage is a lifetime commitment. Did you forget that part?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 01:09 PM
1

No, she was an executive and she's the one who made the money.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:53 PM
0

My IQ is higher than 99% of the entire population. So twice as high as yours.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 02:10 AM
0

I know it's a surprise to you, but other people have brains of their own and can think. They aren't told what to think. They can actually think on their own and they have degrees in math and statistics and can calculate out that there are differences in pay that are not attributed to higher level work.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 01:55 AM
0

Call it whatever you want. It still is true. People need to stop breeding so they don't have to be killed off involuntarily.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:20 AM
-1

Yes, we all want population reduced. That's not "feminist". It's just a fact for everyone. There are way too many people.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:34 PM
0

that doesn't make any sense. if they were happy with their life, they wouldn't be trying to change it. they're obviously not happy with something and they want it changed. idk what you mean by "destroy society, families and stopping children being born". Nobody is doing that. Unless you mean men that have sex without loving and marrying the woman.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:55 PM
-3

You're right. SHE did a lot more than he did.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 05:19 PM
0

Like I said, I do not know the details. If he contributed to the assets then he should get his share. If they were just growing from before marriage, then they aren't marital. I don't know the case at all or the arguments on either side. Seems like he has also earned quite well. No one knows. They're getting along nicely. The B&M Gates story is more straight forward. She contributed more than half and he took her life. He admits to being the reason for the split. They'd go on sharing if it weren…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 05:05 PM
-13

Yes, partner does mean equal. They were equals. Something I'm sure you aren't. How many kids have you birthed.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 04:46 PM
-21

She was his partner in marriage. She earned half by being his partner. She earned more than half by birthing his children. Yes, she earned it more than he did. She gave up her life to be in that role. She can't just get her body and time back and be something else with it. He has used that up.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 04:20 PM
0

Depends on what you think the "feminist agenda" is. Who is behind it are the people that are being hurt by whatever it is they want changed.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:51 PM
-1

I don't know her case, how long they were together, what earnings came during that time, what he contributed, etc.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:35 PM
-22

No, they rarely get their half of the assets, much less getting more. He brings up Bill and Melinda Gates. She's not going to get her half. She was and executive in his company and she's a partner in the foundation. She arguably did more than he did to grow the money they had as a couple. And on top of that, she birthed the children and gave him a good family life, which is worth billions all by itself. She sunk her life into him and he took it from her. She's not being fully compensated for tha…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 03:16 PM
0

Probably because a few men wanted to whine about the wrong people to the wrong people instead of to the men that they think are wrong. It's just easier to whine about women who aren't at fault.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:05 PM
0

Tell it to your lawmaker then. Point out the specific law, instead of vague whining on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 04:11 AM
1

If you say so. You'd be delusional to claim that any current or historical government is not. You're probably delusional in your claim that men are being hurt. If they actually were, the other men would see the threat and act to protect themselves. That's what lawmakers do.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 12:45 AM
1

No, are you? What planet are you from? Here on earth, men have written laws forever.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 03:41 PM
-1

No, you did not. And men are still at fault for making the law. Wtf do you mean by placing blame on women when they aren't in control and never have been.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 04:16 PM
1

and I guess you) believe a woman can't rape a man No, I've never said that. I've said the opposite. Now you're just making up crap.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 09:23 PM
1

Lol, you can't be serious. India is the most fd up place there is when it comes to sexual assault. And who are the lawmakers there? Who have been the lawmakers there since eternity.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 09:01 PM
1

If you're familiar with law at all... you'd recognize that sexual assault laws, as well as every other felony, has degrees. Bodily harm is a higher degree of felony than a simple assault of touching the exterior. This isn't really that complicated. You're trying to make a point that doesn't exist. You're being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 07:46 PM
0

You listed off some places where sexual assault is rampant and you think it's the women's fault that the law doesn't cover men adequately?
/r/MensRights19/07/21 07:33 PM
0

Yes, well penetrating the body is in fact a more severe form of violence. And men can be penetrated in at least a couple of places, with either someone else's body parts or a foreign object. Penetration results in much more serious physical harm in most cases and is a higher level crime.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 06:16 PM
-1

And? Men have made laws since the beginning of time. You can't be serious to blame this on feminists. Give me a break.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 06:06 PM
0

If you're concern is in India, then direct your concern to Indian lawmakers. All laws are subject to jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 05:27 PM
0

It's sexual assault. All of these definitions are specific to a jurisdiction. They are not universal. If your jurisdiction has some other wording, then you need to bring attention to your lawmakers to change it. It's on you to fix it. Most laws were written by men. Tell them.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 04:57 PM
0

Women are also required to provide child support. They do so at a far higher percentage than men do.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 04:40 PM
-5

I have never seen that. Feminists, and pretty much everyone else, have pushed for gender neutral laws. In the USA most laws have been reworded to be gender neutral. It could vary in other countries where they aren't as on top of equality. Push for gender neutral laws where you are.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:53 PM
-3

Informed places don't use the word rape at all. It's sexual assault. And the definition is gender neutral. Degrees depend on details of what happened. For instance, men don't get pregnant from it. But they can get disease. Pregnancy and disease as the result of forcible sexual assault are factors that increase the degree of charge. Other injuries can also. For instance, a man can get a broken penis by having it jammed. It's no joke. It's seriously damaging to his body.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:43 PM
4

But it can be, and that's what the law should reflect. Crime isn't supposed to be a group activity. Victims are individuals.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:32 PM
-12

Most places have already made wording of the law gender neutral. Idk of anyone who would say this isn't rape. I've never seen anyone say that. It's certainly not a feminist position.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:06 PM
0

You're talking specifically about men here. Yes, it's on him to chose well.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 11:48 PM
1

the mans fault for getting into the relationship and not the womans for any reason It can be both, or either. You're talking about men specifically here though.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 11:30 PM
0

how long are you planning on imprisoning these guys to make it so they are never going to have kids again? forever by being unfit in general and not having the ability to be a good father. A good father loves the mother. Right because every relationship that falls apart is the mans fault alone? There are plenty of legitimate reasons for parents to split up. This idea of punishing men to dissuade single parent homes is deeply flawed. The man chose her. His logic is already flawed by making such a…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 11:16 PM
1

So why then should we be for the paper abortion? We're not. Shouldn't we be pushing marriage? We are. Healthy marriage first. A whole problem is people aren't doing that first before they go ahead and reproduce.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 10:52 PM
1

We aren't talking about killing anyone. They can be stopped from reproducing by force of laws that require them to pay or be imprisoned. If they are in prison, they're not reproducing any more. If they are paying as much as they can already afford for the kids they've made, they will be less likely to continue doing it. It's a step wise solution. It is genetic in that these are not the people we want to make more people. We'd rather encourage people with enough intelligence and beneficial behavi…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 10:40 PM
1

Hard to make an economic argument for incurring those costs compared to the lesser cost of child support. No, because if they are out of the pool they won't be creating more kids. We already provide a safety net in welfare. We're not going to also let the parent off the hook financially. They already are paying a very low percentage of the actual cost of raising a kid. And yes, they chose not to be a father by the choices they make, whether that is having sex outside a loving relationship, or by…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 10:30 PM
-3

what about the children who for whatever reason don't have another parent there paying child support Then they receive welfare. But nobody wants to pay for men to keep on having sex and making more of the same problem. Kids without fathers do not do well. It's been studied and proven over and over that kids with two parents do much better than those with only one parent. In particular, fathers need to step up and not just pay for, but also help raise the kids they make. It is not in the interest…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:18 PM
1

Most of the things you listed are not self interest. We pay for education because we don't want to live among a bunch of idiots. It's self interest. The same self interest that doesn't want people reproducing if they aren't capable of making a good product. We just do not want their genes to exist. We want people who can produce to reproduce and make better quality society. You can put the rest of your list in the same category. We do those things to better society so these people aren't in the …
/r/MensRights18/07/21 07:44 PM
6

The glaring problem with "transferring child support" to anyone, is that no one wants to pay for these irresponsible people to reproduce. Not just the "feminists". NO ONE. I certainly don't. The people who are making kids with no intention of supporting them, need to be stopped by any means necessary.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 06:34 PM
13

They need to break up. They aren't compatible at all. But aside from that, he should not be letting her be abusive to him. It's fine if she wants to show him a video and then discuss the topic, but obviously she doesn't want to discuss it and she's blaming him for things he isn't doing. Then why be with him if he's so awful. In this case, she's being awful and unlikely to change.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 04:02 PM
3

Only in your imagination. People blaming their skin for their own behavior and choices doesn't make that reality.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 12:59 PM
1

Aside from all the obvious things wrong with that, What's the financial incentive for anyone to start a company like that and who would pay that much premium? You realize that the amount you pay in has to cover not only all the payouts, but also the salaries of very highly paid people that run it. You want to fork over a million or so in premium, or just be more careful with your sperm.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 07:20 PM
1

I think you could just think about how insurance works and figure that out yourself. Maybe you should explain your version right here as to how you think that would all work. How are you going to pay an entire company of employees on top of the amount you're already paying for support? Who is going to want to pay more than they already do? And what circumstances would allow a claim?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 05:39 PM
2

Nothing. They're supposed to do that. If the child lives with them, they are using it to support the child by default. Everything they buy benefits the child's quality of life and standard of living. The amount of child support ordered to be paid is so minuscule in comparison to the actual cost of care and raising a child that there isn't anything left over. By definition it is going to the child. Even if you were paying millions per month, which nobody is, it is still ultimately going to the ch…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:59 PM
0

I don't know what you're referring to. Did you read the court case? Generally the only way someone can take over legal responsibility for child support is if they adopt the child.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:48 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:34 AM
6

link works fine. but just google straub vs bmt. there are other sources.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:22 AM
2

Correct. Each additional child reduces the first child's share. But the parent never gets a bigger share.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:01 AM
5

Yes, the ruling is correct. Todd cannot pay the share of support owed by Straub because as a custodial parent all of her money is already presumed to be shared with the child. She doesn't have extra money to pay an additional share. And insurance against this type of negligence is not only contrary to public policy, it's also an impossible risk to insure because it's a premeditated act and the cost of care is prohibitively expensive to pay in advance as it is calculated on an ongoing basis.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 10:53 PM
0

Go pop your zits weirdo. Crawl out of your basement and see the world.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 01:28 PM
0

From thousands of women who have to deal with this. You're not a mom. You're just a sweaty 12 yo in mom's basement so obviously you wouldn't see the problems.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:15 AM
0

You're the same idiot saying it over and over when thousands of moms have said otherwise. Shut up moron.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 01:43 AM
1

Hey dickhead. You weren't the mom. Of course it wasn't a problem for you. You're just a fkn bozo doing with your mom says.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:32 PM
1

You're wrong. It does make a difference. Which you wouldn't know because you're not dealing with it.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 09:48 PM
0

Apparently no one can explain this to you because of your low IQ and tiny dick.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:51 PM
1

You're trying to make an argument over the issue. I've simply said that life is easier when your kids have the same last name as you do and so there's no reason to name them something else. You're getting all bent out of shape about that for some reason and continuing to argue about it. She can just use her own name. No reason not to.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:13 PM
0

You're an idiot who doesn't know the difference between a feeling and an emotion, That would be you. I've explained more than once now that there is a process to have a father's name put on a birth certificate and you can't seem to wrap your tiny brain around it because your brain is as tiny as your crooked shriveled up little dick. You shouldn't have had sex with someone you despise you pig then you wouldn't be having this issue. You should have loved someone and married them and then you'd be …
/r/MensRights13/07/21 05:03 PM
1

You're the one trying to create an issue. Kids can have the same name as their mom and make life easier. There's no reason not to, as you have acknowledged.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:52 PM
0

So you're an outlier then, and you obviously haven't looked into the topic on forums where mom's discuss it to even have an inkling that it's a problem and how that would be. Whatever. You're not naming kids, so it's irrelevant that you can't really see what other people deal with.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:39 PM
7

Why didn't you report them instead?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:27 PM
0

Have you been a single mom then?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 03:06 PM
1

Right, but this person is complaining about it as if it's the wrong choice. It's much better to have kids names the same as the mom when the parents are unmarried. The mom generally does all the arrangements for kids which is why they are usually the primary parent. And if they never get married, that causes more issues later.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:55 PM
0

You're an absolute moron. At birth their is no established biological father. The baby didn't come out of the man. To be established as a biological father, there is a legal process, which I've already covered here. It's NOT your child until you prove it legally. Either get married and don't be a pos, or prove you're the father through the legal process. Kids aren't property. Kids aren't pets. You pay child support because you owe society for creating someone that is dependent on society. It's n…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:42 PM
1

But why would she though, particularly if they aren't married. It's much easier to handle everything in life if the kids have the same last name as the mother. It's a lot less confusing for everyone.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:32 PM
0

why do I get 0 rights because I don't want to get married? Because YOU'RE not pregnant. You have no rights because YOU'RE not pregnant. And no, we're not going to change the law so that women can name anyone they want as the father. Everyone would name Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk. How are you this dense.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:10 PM
0

It's not a double standard. Only the woman is pregnant. She's in charge of the birth. The only legal way a man can have a say at that point is to be married to her. You fuck off, idiot.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 01:59 PM
1

Yes, absolutely, the reason is so some poor sap doesn't get named as a father and be forced to pay for someone else's kid for 18 years of his life. It protects men. If the men want "rights" to their children, they can get married first.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 01:36 PM
1

Right. But she can't list a man as the father without the proper process.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:54 AM
2

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/adding-a-father-to-a-birth-certificate-in-washington.html
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:54 PM
2

Your comments suggest that she has the right to put his name down as father, and she doesn't. Her not doing that is not a flag at all. He should have married her before he left his sperm there.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:54 PM
3

In the usa she can't put his name on the certificate because they aren't married. There's a process for that. And no, once the name is on, he's liable for child support.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:42 PM
2

What do you mean she didn't give you the child's last name? You don't know what the child's last name is? Then how do you know what's on the birth certificate? And also, women can't just name random people as the father. There's a process for that.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:27 PM
-8

Red flag about what? And red flags aren't feelings.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:14 PM
-5

That's not what he asked. He asked how you feel.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 04:27 PM
0

The post is about suicide from divorce. Yes, that's what I'm talking about. I'm not trying to say any such thing about suicide. You need to talk to someone about your feelings and what is going on in your life.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:39 PM
0

I'm sorry for you that you're going through whatever you're going through. But I am positive that it can't be boiled down to something simple and put on a number. How would that even make anything better for you? What do you think is a solution? Talk about that instead. Instead of making a burst of angry sentences that don't really tell anyone your story. Don't assume other people's experience is the same as yours.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 11:51 AM
1

So what you are saying is that society dont treat one gender one way and the other gender another way, unequally well? I'm not saying anything of the sort. Weird because all my life i got bullied, and didnt see a single female being bullied in my school. That's just because you don't know about it. It happens just as often and just as awful to girls as it does to boys. Weird all my life ive been told its not "manly enough" to cry, to the point where i even try to hide from my family when i do be…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 07:32 PM
1

That's ridiculous. I love men. Stop lying about why people commit suicide. Nobody is doing it because divorce exists. And then even you don't bother to answer the question of what you think is a solution to the proposed issue. People get divorced. Nobody has to stay married to someone they don't like.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 06:34 PM
0

The retirement fund IS a bank account you idiot. It's no different than other money in the bank. It was part of pay the same as wages. Your lawyer was trying to explain something to you and you act like an idiot. And now you're trying to gain some sort of brownie points on the internet by displaying how ignorant you are about money. Pickmeishia disease.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:23 PM
0

I've just demonstrated in this thread several things you've said which have been categorically wrong No, you haven't. Not a single thing. The only thing you "demonstrated" with your claims is that men have quicker ways to suicide, men possibly have more mental problems?, one guy you know was cheated on and was devastated by it. Yet, you think he shouldn't have been divorced for some reason. What? he should just stay with her and keep living like that? wth. Better you let the adults discuss the d…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:08 PM
1

Accusing you of what? Why would your employer fire you?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:48 PM
0

She couldn't have been at "fault" for the divorce if he didn't file it. He didn't file for divorce regardless of her behavior. "failing to keep her marriage vows" - that's what divorce is for, and yet, he didn't file. You can't make someone be who they are not. You can't make someone love you when they don't. Most people feel bad during divorce. It isn't by gender. You're trying to make a statement but are unclear about what you want. What is it that you think would have been the solution for hi…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:18 PM
0

Yes, you are an idiot, because you claim you went halfsies in one breath, and then in the next sentence you gave him all of the retirement that was earned during the marriage and now you have no retirement funds. That's not integrity. It's just a misunderstanding of the value of things earned. That comes from being uneducated.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:07 PM
1

It really depends on what you're looking for a partner to be. It's doubtful that at your age, you're going to find someone who is going to love you without any shared discussions on things. Ask yourself what's in it for them, and what would make them bond to you? Are you screening out Every woman with an opinion? Or are you willing to understand their opinions and tell them yours? It would seem more productive to find out each other's opinions and see what you have in common or what you're oppos…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:55 PM
1

and again, so it wasn't the divorce that caused it. Why do you keep saying the same thing, and then turn around and say but it wasn't the divorce, it was all these other things that happened?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:35 PM
1

And why are they divorced? What is the change that you would be hoping for?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:25 PM
1

my friend who's wife cheated on him and left him in lockdown while his mum was dying and is now on antidepressants So, not the divorce then... You're the one who is saying men have worse mental problems than women.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:05 PM
1

Nothing was wrong with them? Do you want to draw that conclusion? I don't think people in general commit suicide because of one thing in their life. But elsewhere someone pointed out that women are more likely to file for divorce in the first place. That would indicate that something was wrong, in their opinion, with the man. And none of it applies across the board to all men, or maleness.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:50 AM
1

You're the op saying that "men" have mental problems far more than women. That wasn't my claim.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:34 AM
-1

you can and most would assume that it is because of the divorce, No, you can't assume that. You can't draw a conclusion like that at all. Overwhelmingly people who are divorced do not commit suicide. and even if it isnt, that just shows that the specific genders problems and suicidal thoughts are completely overlooked by the society There are the same resources in public for men and women. It's not gender specific. But go with that thought for a minute. What is it that you think society should d…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:24 AM
0

I know it's not math or statistics. Why do people who don't know anything think that people who do aren't going to notice?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:39 AM
0

Yes, random word strings that have no meaning or relevance to anything that's been said.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:54 AM
0

So you don't know what words mean now? You're just making up random word strings.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:28 AM
0

And it doesn't apply to the question here.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:18 AM
1

They do.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:52 AM
1

I've already explained why taking that particular sub sample would give that result. Look to the reasons they are divorced in the first place. Something was already wrong. They aren't committing suicide because they're divorced. Lots of people get divorced and lots of men are thrilled to move on. It's not the divorce. It's the reasons they divorced and they are generally the same reasons.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:40 AM
-1

I've already explained why it doesn't and the answer is obvious.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:30 AM
0

The topic has been studied. Stop making things up. Consider the actual divorces people have gone through. What was the reason for the final decision? It's written right in the statute what the considerations are. Check them off. Men don't hit all the buttons. And, if the men are violent, they shouldn't have custody. So that happens far more often than it should as well. As someone else pointed out, women file more often. Why do you think that is? Because they're the one who sees something wrong.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:35 PM
1

There are many reasons people give for suicide. Men have more access to guns which gives them a devastating edge since they make a spur of the moment decision that can't be taken back. That would be one reason.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:05 PM
-2

A degree makes them more informed than you. Probably smarter as well since you're having a difficult time with your logic skills.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:42 PM
-1

Why are you dumb? Taking a large sample does not prove causation. The divorce isn't making them suicidal. It's the other way around. All people in prisons have eaten white bread. Obviously, by your logic, we should outlaw white bread because it makes people commit felonies.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:17 PM
1

Yes, people who file for divorce do so because they are fed up with the situation and the spouse. So you're saying that more men are at fault for divorce. You're just proving the point that you're trying to not prove here.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 10:00 PM
-2

I do understand it. Thoroughly. You're the one that does not. There is a reason that more women get primary custody and that is because of the choices of the couple before divorce. Girls are given dolls to take care of when they are little kids. Boys rarely are. Girls are trained to take care of children and plan their lives from early on in life and boys rarely are. Girls are generally the primary caretaker before divorce, which means it's in the best interest of children to keep it that way be…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:47 PM
0

So, a bunch of people have already pointed out some reasons why that number isn't really telling you much that you can infer from. But there's also the obvious thing that you have to account for first. Maybe they're divorced because they were having mental issues in the first place. Divorce didn't cause that. It was the result of existing problems.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:35 PM
-14

Statistics matter. Yes, and I have a degree in this and you don't. You can't assume someone who is divorce committed suicide because of anything to do with divorce. In fact it's more likely the other way around that they got divorced because things were already wrong in their lives. Same with custody issues. The same goes with your diversion to police shooting people. Just because the police shot someone doesn't mean they shot them BECAUSE of their skin. That isn't the case at all. Almost all sh…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 07:08 PM
-14

No, you can't assume that. Suicide is a very personal choice. Some people are more prone to it than others as a solution to their perceived problems. It's not necessarily someone else's fault and you can't just draw that conclusion by a number of the people that do it. That's not how stats data works. If you want to look at anecdotal data, I know a lot of people who are divorced and don't know of any that committed suicide.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 06:37 PM
-15

What meaning would you be giving such a stat? It would mean nothing without context for every single one. Why did they get divorced? What were the underlying reasons. Why did they "lose" custody? While there are a probably a few instances where it's not the case, the vast majority of the time it was because of choices they made in life. Possibly choices they didn't even know they were making at the time.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 06:20 PM
32

Whether she meets the definition of a pedophile or not should not be the question. She did the acts and there is a victim. There must be a lot missing from this story. It seems to be focused on risk of re-offending, which it describes the reasons she is not likely to do. But it shouldn't mitigate the punishment for what she already did.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 02:30 PM
5

Why would you get laughed at for learning? I think you're hanging around the wrong crowd. Besides, now everything is explained on youtube. You can literally do anything if you're moderately intelligent.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 11:11 AM
1

You sound like an abuser that thinks he's entitled to control women. It's up to the patient, every time.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 01:19 AM
1

No, that's not how it goes when you're the patient. They don't ask they just tell you go here go there and then it's going on. Unless she speaks up and says when she goes in that husband is there and wants to be in the appt, they aren't going to ask about it usually.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:52 AM
1

Your comment was ignorant and incorrect. Men don't own women and they don't get to go to private medical appointments without the request of the patient. YOU don't have any rights to a woman.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:39 AM
2

No. You do some reading on pregnancy and women's healthcare and abuse of women. She doesn't request to be alone. It's the other way around. Abused people are unable to speak in front of that abuser.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 07:31 AM
2

Exactly. And she needs to follow up on her wishes to see that they are carried out into a plan that will actually be adhered to in delivery and aftercare. I found that requests were nodded and seemingly agreed to in advance, but when hospital time comes, none of that was even remotely in place. There's not a lot the patient can do at that point because the birth is going to happen whether you want it to or not. So it's better to ask what the usual routine is, while you can go somewhere else, rat…
/r/MensRights02/07/21 12:18 AM
0

No, women get to say who is involved in their care. If they don't say they want someone in their legally private room, that person doesn't come it. It's not the place for the dr to say. Fathers, as well as anyone else, don't get to come in to a private appointment unless the patient says so. Men don't own women. You're the one being sexist here.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 12:02 AM
3

Feels bad to be left out of a one time special event like that. She's going to have to learn to speak up because pregnant women are treated badly throughout. She needs to question things all the time and not get pushed around. She could easily have said to get you when it became apparent they were going to begin. "Shouldn't my husband be here for this now?"
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:37 PM
5

It's your wife's choice to have you in there or not and she is the one who should have said something to have you brought in. The drs office is not going to assume that or invite you in without her say so because it's a common trait of abusers to go to appointments so that the woman doesn't get a chance to say things in private. Not saying you're an abuser, just that's the policy. I don't know why your wife didn't think you'd want to see and be with her.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 11:27 PM
1

So, a judge, child custody evaluator, lawyer, etc listening to you talk, is going to be listening for signs that you think you're entitled, which can make them believe other negative things about you. The way you said she would "kill the child, even though we were past the point of no return in our state", sounds like someone calling abortion murder which doesn't go well. And phrases like "get the child" sound bad. You haven't said a lot here, but from my limited experience in seeing cases where…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:53 PM
1

Ok, you hadn't said you had a lawyer for that, so yes, it's probably there to stay at least for now. And I meant pay attention to the details of what you're restricted from doing because if you violate it in any way she can put you in jail. The details aren't irrelevant really. They shed light on what the court thinks happened. You may be in front of another judge for custody, but they will look at the details that were said, such as what specifically were you accused of and what details support…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:48 PM
1

It matters what country and state you are in. I don't know who does what. You'll have to google and ask and ask. But I have seen ads so I know they're out there. You went to the hearing and defended yourself without a lawyer? So how long is the RO for then? It is much more difficult to deal with custody if you're restricted from talking to her and you need to be very clear about the boundaries listed in the RO to avoid breaking them. Did you go to her house? And how did the ex observe that? Did …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:08 PM
1

So, are you broken up then? In what ways is she abusing you and what has been your reaction? Write that down. Why did her ex say that you went into her house? Was he there? Is the RO actually a TRO or have you had a hearing? How far along is the pregnancy? She can get an abortion for reasons, but they are extremely expensive. Or she could self abort by obtaining medication herself. That's not your concern at the moment. There are organizations that help you with this. Have a lawyer. Also you nee…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:38 PM
1

How ever many men raised money for and organized.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 02:13 PM
0

You're an idiot. Go tell everyone you're gay.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:07 AM
1

If you haven't figured this out by now, no one is going to be able to explain it to you. Go ahead and tell everyone that you're gay. And then you'll just be known as gay and a harasser.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 01:15 AM
1

Condoms work pretty well. And limiting your partners. And yes, the government wants to make a father figure responsible. A man that steps into the role of father walking away harms children.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:33 AM
1

No, they can't keep your dna from a blood test legally. But people can get their own test from a cheek swab and a private company now. If you have access to the kid even once a guy can just do a secret test and see if you're related and not tell unless there's a reason.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 11:23 PM
1

That happens. Sorry you didn't do the test sooner and save some headaches. But on the whole, people are not going to want forced dna tests. I certainly wouldn't want my kids dna taken against their will and kept by who knows who. It's an extreme violation of privacy for them. And frankly it can be seen who their likely father is. So I disagree that it should be routine. I do think people should have easy access to it though even without marriage, and I'm wondering why you didn't.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 11:06 PM
1

Did you eventually have it done? Were you married? I understand why people say not to say that because it means you suspect it's not yours for some reason and it introduces doubt in the relationship. Also it might not matter if the court says you'd have to pay child support because you were married. That's a bigger battle and I do think that there are circumstances where the correct father should be held accountable to pay.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:45 PM
0

No, the two issues are completely separate. It is not in the best interest of society to have a man reproducing and making everyone else pay for it. He's going to have to pay for the result of where he left his sperm. The issue of abortion is strictly about medical conditions and body autonomy. The two issues aren't the same at all in how they affect society. Paternity testing is already done when requested.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:33 PM
1

Right, and it has nothing to do with harassment. Harassment isn't a positive and it doesn't mean you like someone. Quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 08:07 PM
1

Everything is taken in context. Saying you are gay does not mean you didn't harass someone. It's literally pointless to have that discussion.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 07:56 PM
0

Child
/r/MensRights09/05/21 11:08 PM
0

I have education and experience far beyond yours. You have nothing to lend. You're ranting on topics you have no knowledge of. And you're unwilling to explain why.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:45 PM
1

Maybe. I just don't know of any cases. And when people have told me they didn't get any custody and then I ask them what reasons the court gave, or what accusations there were about them being unfit, they just get mad and stop talking and don't answer the question. They never tell the truth of the court proceedings and then proceed to explain why the court was wrong. So I have yet to come across a single one where this abuse actually occurred. It's actually extremely difficult to prevent the oth…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:24 PM
2

And what would you do with that information? Every situation has unique facts. And there aren't enough people available to provide a proper home for every child.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:10 PM
2

Different authors make their own accusations, but looking at generalized data, money is the number one factor in solving childcare. Two parents are going to have more time and money generally than one.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:09 PM
1

Any mention of "financial abortion" is purely nonsense and completely ignores the economic and social reason for child support to exist. It's never going away. Ever. It is not in the interest of society as a whole to allow single men to impregnate and leave behind children and require society to take on the responsibility of raising children from that type of man. Society has an interest in stopping that from degrading society as a whole for all the reason's mentioned here as to why families wit…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 02:04 PM
1

In the US, the only reason the laws give for awarding no custody, is if the parent has been shown by evidence to be unfit to parent. Otherwise custody is awarded, per SCOTUS.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:49 PM
1

Women aren't owned by men and have a right to move to better their lives, or save their lives. What would your solution be? Someone has to care for the kids. Who should that be? It's a fact specific answer. Not everyone is in the same circumstance. People need jobs that work for their lives so they can live. One solution isn't going to work for everyone. You have to spell out how you think your idea is going to work for everyone, but especially the kids. They aren't pets.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:26 PM
1

I agree with you that bashing anyone because they're male or female does nothing to solve any problems. When people say "women do this" or "men do that" I should think it's obvious that it doesn't mean all of them. It just means some of them and if the thing is a problem then those who do it should change, and if the thing is a good thing, then others should join them. It's kind of like noting that "men robbed a bank, so arrest all men". Uh no, nobody is saying that. But the particular ones who …
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:19 PM
1

Right. Neither of those are true. Men are not bad people by virtue of being men, and they didn't get their personalities from just their parents. And great for that because a majority of people are incapable of being good parents for a variety of reasons and children shouldn't be doomed to repeat their parents lives.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:14 PM
0

Get back to me when you know anything about it. You obviously know nothing about maths. You obviously know nothing about divorce or marriage. You obviously know nothing about the laws. You obviously know nothing. Idk why I'm even talking to you since you know nothing, and you're not even involved in the situation.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:11 PM
0

Then what are you here blabbing about?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 03:59 AM
0

Ok, well that was a lot of nothing. Why are you divorced? What were the reasons your wife told you (or the court)?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 01:31 AM
0

No, you're the one who said that women are the abusers. I said that abused women file for divorce. That is the correct thing to do to stop the abuse and to protect children from it. There is nothing to "work on" when one person is abusive.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 05:42 PM
-2

So why did you bring it up? Why are you having this conversation when you know nothing about life yet.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 04:45 PM
-2

So you have no knowledge or experience in life. Go away then.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 04:44 PM
-4

You're not going to answer? Why would you bring up women being abusers if it doesn't apply to you?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:50 PM
-14

So you were being attacked? That's why you got divorced?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 02:43 PM
-20

If the partner doesn't want to do any of those things a person doesn't have to destroy the rest of their life by staying and being abused daily. They would stay married if the spouse wasn't abusing them in some way. So the more difficult life of being a single parent is only relative to more difficult compared to having a good spouse, vs less difficult than staying with someone who is abusive to them in some way.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 02:28 PM
-33

You can't quote a meaningless statistic and infer meaning. For instance your first line. Women initiate divorce. Well why is that? Why would they choose a more difficult life if the life they have is working out? They don't. They get divorced because it's not working out and cannot. Look deeper for your answer. I'm assuming by your focus that you are divorced. Only you know the reasons for that.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:07 PM
-5

All of these posts and comments quoting statistics, whether accurate or not, are what's called Lying with statistics. You're trying to make a point by actually twisting what the statistic is into a meaning that it is not. For instance, % from fatherless homes, % divorce initiated by women, % this or that. Those are meaningless out of context and you all know it. What pushes anyone to file for divorce? Why are there fatherless homes? Who is at fault? Who raises children? Mother? No not really. Mo…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:03 PM
1

They're not the feminist "movement". A feminist could possibly be both, but it's not the same thing. I guess you're done. Bye.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:56 PM
1

Feminists are not misandrists. Very different things. You're just being bitter here and not making any point.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:51 PM
1

do you really think parents should spy on their own parents? yes
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:48 PM
1

Those two points are also my experience. They are general, yes, and not applicable to every individual man.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 06:46 PM
0

I said I disagree with that portion of the statement. I agree with the rest.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 04:44 PM
1

I saw them. I don't disagree with any of them except the 'all of them' statement, which I just took to be frustration at how common it is.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:57 PM
-2

I don't see how it's "massive broad generalization". If just one person did it, that's enough and worth warning others to look out for it.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:24 PM
-3

Ok, I read your other comment. And good for you that you're not like this. But plenty of men are and that was her point. Say no and find out whether they behave or not with the first no. This is actually extremely common and if you and your friends don't do it, then you're in a better circle of people than most. Because most people know of this type.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:01 PM
-1

Seems pretty accurate. Which part did you think was fake?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:44 PM
1

That's really not a problem. The laws are written. People should be taught that they exist and how to follow them. Including examples. Instead of complaining about "who" is teaching, discuss the actual topic instead.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:05 PM
1

That's a lot to unpack. I'm not disputing the damage rape causes - I know several men and women who have been victims of sexual assault including two family members of mine. Some have been able to shrug it off some haven't. However none of them have reached a level of hating the gender that assaulted them. Some understandably have trust issues in relationships but all can see it was an individual not a gender that assaulted them. No one shrugged it off. They're just not telling you or they've no…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:18 AM
1

I have a lifetime of experience. That's where it comes from. Strength and power are absolutely main factors in sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:43 AM
1

I guess I'd need to know what they were teaching first before I could judge that accurately. And so would you.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:41 AM
1

There's really no point in a vague statement like that. It just shows you're bitter about something undefined and has no real meaning behind it.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:39 AM
0

Then what needs to change is the pervasive culture that we all know exists where people think sexual assaults are acceptable or even funny. People need to know and understand how devastating it is to someone. The reason accusations are believable is that we all know how pervasive the behavior is and how much it's gotten away with. That is going to lead to some false accusations being presented, I agree with you on that. Sexual assault and abuse needs to be stopped cold. Even your assertion here …
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:38 AM
0

Not sure what your point is with that article. It doesn't negate what I said that's for sure. But also men at 16 are bigger and stronger than women at 16. Victims in most cases have less strength to fight back, that's why they are selected. And opportunity and ability to prevent being found out are also huge factors.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:15 AM
0

The probability is extremely high. And the devastation it causes is life ending.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:09 AM
-7

Isn’t 80/90% of rapes by someone the woman knows or is dating Yes. Women can't know who is going to be a rapist before they rape. That's why weapons are no use. At which point does one get out the knife and stab their friend? There's no clear line. Do you stab them as soon as they touch you without asking first? Seems like that's not going to hold up in court. And by the time it's clear, then it's too late. So yes, women do need to assume anyone is possibly a rapist because it's the worst thing …
/r/MensRights06/05/21 02:07 AM
-6

Sure, you probably should look out for those things and protect yourself. Don't be alone with women.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:29 AM
-4

You don't think there are decent people that could teach other people how to be decent?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:27 AM
-15

Women do have to assume that any man could be a rapist. It's just too big of risk not to. And the worst ones are the ones who seem like a friend and then aren't. And just a few minutes on reddit will show you that people do need to be taught how to behave.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 11:02 PM
3

Yes. And even if they were just going to talk about one type of bullying, then both sides should be there so it can stop. How is it helpful to just have the target hear about bullying if the bully isn't in on hearing how it's wrong to do?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 07:41 PM
0

It changes nothing. Nobody is going to believe that you didn't harass someone just because you tell them you're gay. It's a ridiculous thought.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:41 PM
1

No, I'm an expert on the topic.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:12 PM
1

I'm not. I'm speaking on behalf of general knowledge of people's experience which is contrary to your narrow view that apparently you haven't experienced much harassment or been in chats with people who have.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 03:20 PM
0

No. It's completely irrelevant. Just because you do it for whatever reason, doesn't mean others have the same motive. No one thinks that gay people do not harass others. And frankly, some are even worse because of their own sexuality.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:12 PM
3

Your personal reasons for being vulgar doesn't translate to everyone else.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:00 AM
3

That isn't true. Gay people are just as likely as anyone to harass someone. Harassment isn't a reflection of sexual desire. It's demeaning and threatening.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:35 PM
25

No. And it wouldn't do any good. People who are gay also sexually harass others. Why bother to lie.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 08:02 PM
0

You obviously don't want to say anything relevant or make any sort of point. So I'm done talking to you. Apparently you just want to wallow in your self pity.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:08 AM
0

No, it's not proven wrong. It's correct. Stop now. You have nothing to say apparently.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 12:32 AM
0

I told you, personal knowledge. I'm not going to search for a single source that you can read. Go look at each state yourself.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:38 PM
0

personal knowledge. look it up. it's been that way for decades.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:07 PM
-1

Joint custody is when both parents have approximately equal time with the kids and equal rights to them and share responsibilities. That is a very common schedule of joint custody, yes, because it gives each parent every other weekend to plan and do things with the kids while they're off school and the weekdays are stable so that the kids can attend school, school activities, or daycare. It works out well for most people because it provides stability and equal time of days with the kids. It does…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 05:52 PM
0

"amends the current law from being in favor of joint custody ". It's really the same thing dressed up in different words.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 10:58 AM
0

shut up
/r/MensRights03/05/21 03:34 AM
0

No, the uniform child custody is in every state. Every state presumes both parents share custody. It's been that way for decades at least.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 02:09 AM
0

Every state presumes equal custody. To deviate from that, one person has to convince the court that it's in the child's best interest to change that. Yes, women have to fight for custody in order to get sole custody. It's incredibly rare.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 02:02 AM
0

I'm familiar with the statistics and the reasons for them. You're the one gaslighting here.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:54 AM
0

women in family courts don't need evidence. Its not required Wrong. People have to jump through a million hoops and pay out every penny they have to prevent an abuser from having their children when that abuser is the other parent. It's a flat out lie. The law in every state requires visits and "reunification plans". In fact, statistics show that if a man actually tries for full custody, he is very likely to get it. But most men don't want it. There are very few that actually try. So back to you…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:40 AM
0

we're talking about what results in childbirth No, we're not. We're talking about violence against someone's body. If you're not the pregnant one, that isn't violence against your body.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:02 AM
0

leaving your kids alone with an abuser. False. If there is evidence of abuse, that can be used as evidence in court, just like it can for women. The rest stands on it's own. You need to explain circumstances the same way women did to get attention to their issues. And you need to explain what I've already said.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:01 AM
-2

No, it isn't the same at all. Your body isn't going to get more infected with disease if your partner isn't on hormonal bc. Condoms prevent more than pregnancy. And your body isn't the one that's altered by pregnancy. It's not the same.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 03:35 PM
1

Rape is generally defined as penetration. If you did the penetration, you weren't raped. You may have been sexually assaulted in some form. But not rape.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 03:17 PM
6

Imo, counseling as a fix, is a lie. It really does nothing even if the counselor is sympathetic.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 03:15 PM
-1

I don't think anyone knows what sort of violence men are enduring that they are unable to get help with. Men are generally bigger than women so the usual things that women face aren't much of a threat to men as they can simply avoid it. Men also generally have control of money so they can leave a situation. If a man (men) is facing violence without anyone arresting the perpetrator, that is not a well known circumstance. It needs more explanation for the public to understand the dynamics of that.…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:52 PM
-1

The article neglects to tell what they are talking about.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 08:58 PM
2

If I ever knew of one, I would encourage them to report.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 07:05 PM
1

Yes. And they did. Our local shelter provides a separate place for men as needed. Women have worked on this issue for decades. Men can do the same.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 06:03 PM
0

You're right. I'm not reading any of your responses. afaik You provided one example of one man who was unable to find help from one woman's shelter. You haven't described any sort of common scenario where women are commonly violently abusing men and not being charged for it in any way upon seeking help from authorities. You posted some random statistic that doesn't make any correlation to what you're complaining about. Then you go on to say that you've never experienced this and you don't know a…
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:48 PM
1

Women have the same pressure. And the result is the same. You're not really proposing any solution. Raise money and solve the problem yourself.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:04 PM
1

The "sources" you list aren't really sources. You're rambling off a bunch of nonsense that has no statistical relevance. And if you actually think this is a widespread problem, it's really up to you to bring it to light, raise money and create support and shelters, the same way that woman have. It's not up to women to provide that to you.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 04:00 PM
1

Now you're just making things up. Show us all these reports from victims. No one I've come across has ever told me what you're claiming. It's certainly not known to anyone in the legal system. Why would that be if there are so many men making reports of violence against them from women? Are you?
/r/MensRights28/04/21 12:15 PM
1

Ok? And by whom were those done? Women. So if men want the same attention to a problem they are hiding, they need to self report and explain their problems in public.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 12:12 PM
1

Considering that I don't need you to know any of this for any reason, I guess it's a gamble I'm willing to take. Your responses have been snide ah remarks with no purpose other than to just be snide ah remarks.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 12:11 PM
1

Are you an obgyn? A woman? Or just an all around ah. What is your interest in the topic that you're looking for change. Here is an example of another kind of dr that women don't want. A pervert or ah.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:32 AM
1

Name fits.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:28 AM
2

It's the same question. People are encouraged to report and get out of the situation. Information is made available.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:24 AM
0

Then report it.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:23 AM
1

So how would they expect anyone to know there is a problem if they aren't willing to say so.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:17 PM
-2

I didn't say they shouldn't press charges. I specifically said they should when there is physical violence that rises to the level of a crime. And then I asked you if you have personal experience with being battered and the police not handling it.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:09 PM
7

You're right, I see a lot of webpages with personal stories of women who were abused and not that many personal stories from men. Maybe you need to have a place where men can tell their story as well and the police response to that.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:40 PM
-11

If they're going to the dr with broken bones and bruises, the police should take a report and press charges. Has that happened to you?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:37 PM
-16

Men are sometimes also abused. But statistically it is women and children because they tend to be smaller and because society ingrains attitudes that abusing them is normal. I haven't heard your description of toxic masculinity. Toxic masculinity is a term for behavior that harms men by pushing them to behave in ways that are unhealthy for them under the pretense that they aren't "real men" if they don't. Such as risky behavior or violent behavior.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:04 PM
-7

And? Are you saying people should be arrested for things they didn't do so it would balance out? How many of those people didn't commit a crime?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:59 PM
-4

Why do you think that? In what way would it not?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:20 PM
-6

How is it discrimination? The law doesn't specify any gender. It would apply to everyone.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:12 PM
0

You know nothing.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:39 PM
0

You obviously don't know anything about women either. It's not silly to women that doctors don't know how their body works and they do significant damage to their functioning, which extends to their entire life when they cause or don't repair problems.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:38 PM
1

You must be ancient to bring up Archie Bunker or know anything he has said. And why? What's your point? You just try to be a gnat?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 04:17 PM
1

How old are you?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 03:47 PM
0

It's a failure of the entire specialty. If you read or look for any material on the topic, you will find there is none. It doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:23 AM
1

Female anatomy and nerve functions. USA, and pretty much everywhere around the world. They have very little research on the topic and simply teach basics that they have always taught about women's bodies. And it's the doctors that are being sexist. Frankly, it's not limited to one gender of doctor. It's a failure of the entire specialty.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 09:16 AM
-5

USA. And I've had several. Not in their opinion. They think they're the most helpful useful people on earth. They're not. They downplay pretty much everything, or prescribe something useless. And their surgical skills and knowledge are beyond horrifying.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:19 PM
-7

Generally women want a doctor that actually knows anatomy and problems women have and most male gyns don't. You tell them something and they say "oh i never heard of that before" as if they literally never heard of it, when they could go out in their waiting room and pick up a magazine and have it explained. They just generally have a bad attitude about women.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 09:49 PM
3

I'm listening. Tell me what you would say that you think nobody is listening to. You're very vague as to what opinion you're trying to share and what you'd want her response to be. I don't think any women are a collective. Each person is going to have individual thoughts, just like you. I don't even see your point about why any individual woman should "reconsider feminism" for you or what your end goal would be. You didn't answer my question as to how they collectively harm your life.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 04:55 PM
5

What sort of "fair chance" would you want from them? In what way do they affect your life?
/r/MensRights24/04/21 06:15 PM
1

You each get one side equally. don't marry someone you don't want to partner with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/21 08:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter